marketing management
DESCRIPTION
this is a presentation on demand forecasting taking nilkamal as an example .. note . data is hypotheticalTRANSCRIPT
RITESH ASHISH
DEEPAKSUDHIR
Profile We have been in business for the past 50
years manufacturing plastic furniture.
Vision Every house should have a product of our
company.
MissionCreating value through convenience.
Swot Analysis
STRENGTH• Huge Capital• Large No. of dealers
spread all over the country.
OPPORTUNITIES• India’s one of the
fastest growing market.
WEAKNESS• Problems in future
predictions.
THREATS• Perception that it’s
not environmental friendly.
Segmenting &Targeting The Market
Segmented markets-
1. Households- Low & Middle level
2. Commercial industries
Year Sales (Lower Level) in Lakhs
Sales (Middle level) in Lakhs
Sales (Consumer Industries) in Lakhs
1999 5 5 12
2000 7 10 20
2001 9 15 28
2002 12 20 33
2003 16 26 39
2004 20 35 44
2005 24 39 48
2006 27 45 52
2007 30 51 54
2008 35 55 60
Sales Of Targeted Market
Forecasting Demand For The Targeted Markets
• Delhi
• Bangalore
• Chennai
Potential Market Attractiveness Of The Area
City India Brand Sales
India Category
Sales
BDI
Delhi 0.041 0.033 124
Bangalore 0.026 0.025 104
Chennai 0.031 0.037 83
Regional Characteristics of the targeted market
City Households (000)
Avg. household income (lakhs p.a)
Avg. household expenditur-e (lakhs p.a)
10+Lakhs p.a (000)s
1+ Crore p.a households
exp / inc index
Chennai 1,485 174 116 25 433 0.67
Source-Brand equity,08 march 06. Attributed to great Indian middle class
City(All figs in Rs Cr)
Food Products
FMCG Dura-bles
Misc. goods/servic-es
Total Market
Chennai 7,902 823 470 10,102 19,297
Source: Brand Equity, 08 March 06. Attributed to Indicus Analytics.
Expenses On Various Sectors
Potential Market Size of The Targeted Area
City Potential Market Size
Chennai 10,88,23,300
Note. In Indian Rs.
ESTIMATED POTENTIAL MARKET SIZE
TOTAL MARKET POTENTIAL = No. Of Potential Buyers * Avg. Quantity Purchased * Avg. Price
Chennai - 4,35,293*1*250= 10,88,23,300
Mumbai - 12,88,365*1*250= 32,20,91,125IN CRORES
Total Market Potential by Chain Ratio Method
City Total Market Potential
Chennai 10,88,25,000
Note. In Indian Rs.
Forecasting Methods
• Time Series : Simple trend
• Time Series : Moving & Weighted Avg.
• Regression
Current Trend (Lower Level Income In Chennai)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
S
A
L
E
S
In Lakhs (Rs.)
No. Of Years
Y= a + bXa -11541.6b 5.776
Year CALCULATION OF REGRESSION VALUE IN LAKHS(RS.)1999 4.52000 10.32001 16.12002 21.92003 27.62004 33.42005 39.22006 452007 50.82008 56.3
Y= a + bXa -11867.8b 5.94
Year CALCULATION OF REGRESSION VALUE IN LAKHS(RS.)1999 14.22000 20.22001 26.12002 32.12003 38.12004 442005 49.92006 53.82007 53.82008 59.8
Y= -11867.77+5.94(2005)Y= -11867.77+5.94(2006)Y= -11867.77+5.94(2007)Y= -11867.77+5.94(2008)
Y= -11867.77+5.94(1999)Y= -11867.77+5.94(2000)Y= -11867.77+5.94(2001)Y= -11867.77+5.94(2002)Y= -11867.77+5.94(2003)Y= -11867.77+5.94(2004)
CALCULATION OF REGRESSION LINE AND RESIDUALS (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIES)
CALCULATION OF REGRESSION LINE AND RESIDUALS (MIDDLE LEVEL)
Y= -11541.63+5.776(1999)Y= -11541.63+5.776(2000)Y= -11541.63+5.776(2001)Y= -11541.63+5.776(2002)Y= -11541.63+5.776(2003)Y= -11541.63+5.776(2004)Y= -11541.63+5.776(2005)Y= -11541.63+5.776(2006)Y= -11541.63+5.776(2007)Y= -11541.63+5.776(2008)
Forecasting Demand for Lower level in Chennai (09)
Forecasted Demand(09)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
9920
0020
0120
0220
0320
0420
0520
0620
0720
0820
09
Line 1
Line 2
Y= a+bx (Sales= -6793.4 + 3.4*x(2009)
(Sales= 37.2 in lakhs for 2009)
No. of Years
S
A
L
E
S
In Lakhs (Rs.)
Regression Line
Year Original Sales Regression Point
Residual
1999 5 3.2 1.8
2000 7 6.6 .4
2001 9 10 -1
2002 12 13.4 -1.4
2003 16 16.8 -.8
2004 20 20.2 -.2
2005 24 23.6 .4
2006 27 27 0
2007 30 30.4 -.4
2008 35 33.8 1.2
RESIDUALS
Plotting of residuals
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Series1
..\..\..\Desktop\low level simple trend• Open stat result
Current Trend for Medium level in Chennai
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
East
No. Of Years
S
A
L
E
S
In lakhs (Rs.)
Forecasted Demand For Medium Level Household in Chennai
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Line 1
Line 2
S
A
L
E
S
In Lakhs (Rs.)
No. Of Years
62.35 Forecasted Demand
Y= a+bx (Sales= -11541.63 + 5.776*x(2009)
(Sales= 62.35 in lakhs for 2009)
Year Original Sales Regression Value
Residual
1999 5 4.5 .5
2000 10 10.3 -.3
2001 15 16.1 -1.1
2002 20 21.9 -1.9
2003 26 27.6 -1.6
2004 35 33.4 1.6
2005 39 39.2 -.2
2006 45 45 0
2007 51 50.8 .2
2008 55 56.5 -1.5
Residual
Plotting of residuals
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Series1
..\..\..\Desktop\medium level simple trend• Open stat result
Current Trend in Commercial Industries in Chennai
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Line 1
S
A
L
E
S
In Lakhs (Rs.)
No. Of Years
Forecasted Demand For Commercial Industries in Chennai
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
East
Line 2
Line 2
Y= a+bx (Sales= -11867.7 + 5.94*x(2009)
(Sales=73 .72 in lakhs for 2009)
No. Of Years
S
A
L
E
S
In Lakhs (Rs.) 73.72 lakhsForecasted Demand
Residual
Year Original Sales Regression Value
Residual
1999 12 14.2 -2.2
2000 20 20.2 -.2
2001 28 26.1 1.9
2002 33 32.1 .9
2003 39 38 1
2004 44 44 0
2005 48 49.9 -1.9
2006 52 55.8 -3.8
2007 54 61.8 -7.8
2008 60 67.7 -7.7
Plotting of residuals
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Series1
..\..\..\Desktop\commercial industries simple trend analysis• Open stat result
Moving Avg. Methods
Formula
Forecasted year = Sum of 3 Previous years
3
1Y=Y1+Y2+Y3/3IN LAKHS(RS.)5+7+9/3 77+9+12/3 9.39+12+16/3 12.312+16+20/3 1616+20+24/3 2020+24+27/3 23.624+27+30/3 2727+30+35/3 30.6
30.6
Y=Y1+Y2+Y3/3IN LAKHS(RS.)5+10+15/3 1010+15+20/3 1515+20+26/3 20.320+26+35/3 2726+35+39/3 33.335+39+45/3 39.639+45+51/3 4545+51+55/3 50.3
50.3
Y=Y1+Y2+Y3/3IN LAKHS(RS.)12+20+28/3 2020+28+33/3 2728+33+39/3 33.333+39+44/3 38.639+44+48/3 43.644+48+52/3 4848+52+54/3 51.352+54+60/3 55.3
55.3
2005,2006&20072006,2007&2008Demand for 2009
1999,2000&20012000,2001&20022001,2002&20032002,2003&20042003,2004&20052004,2005&2006
TIME PERIOD
TIME PERIOD1999,2000&20012000,2001&20022001,2002&20032002,2003&20042003,2004&20052004,2005&20062005,2006&20072006,2007&2008Demand for 2009
MOVING AVERAGES METHOD (FOR COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIES)
MOVING AVERAGES METHOD (FOR MIDDLE INCOME LEVEL)
MOVING AVERAGES METHOD (FOR LOWER INCOME LEVEL)TIME PERIOD
1999,2000&20012000,2001&20022001,2002&20032002,2003&20042003,2004&20052004,2005&20062005,2006&20072006,2007&2008Demand for 2009
Demand Forecast for lower level income household
• Forecasting Demand = D(06+07+08)
for 2009 3
• D of 09 = (27+30+35) = 30.6 (lakhs)
3
• D of 09 = 30.6 lakhs
Note: All Amounts in Rs.
Graphical Representation
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Line 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Line 1
Sales Graph of previous 8 Periods
Note : 1 Period = Avg. Demand Of 3 years
Sales Graph of 9 Periods including the forecasted year
S
A
L
E
S
S
A
L
E
S
No. Of yearsNo. Of years
In lakhsIn lakhs
Household of Medium Level Income
• Forecasting Demand = D(06+07+08)
for 2009 3
• D of 09 = (45+51+55) = Rs. 50.3(lakhs)
3
• D of 09 = 50.3 lakhs
Note : 1 Period = Avg. Demand Of 3 years
Graphical Representation
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Line 1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Line 1
S
A
L
E
S
S
A
L
E
S
No. Of years No. Of years
In lakhs In lakhs
Note : In Indian Rs.
Sales Graph of previous 8 Periods Sales Graph of 9 Periods including
the forecasted year
Commercial Industries
• Forecasting Demand = D(06+07+08)
for 2009 3
• D of 09 = (52+54+60) = Rs.55.3 (lakhs)
3
• D of 09 = 55.3 lakhs
Note: All Amounts in Rs.
Graphical representation
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Line 1
Line 2
Line 3
S
A
L
E
S
In lakhs
No. Of years
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Line 1
Line 2
Line 3
No. Of years
S
A
L
E
S
In lakhs
Sales Graph of previous 8 Periods Sales Graph of 9 Periods including the forecasted year
Note : In Indian Rs.
Forecasting through Weighted Avg. Method
• In this we assign different degrees of importance to the values.
• Highest weight is given to the most recent data.
• Formula –
f(y)= (y1+2y2+ 3y3)
6
Household (lower level Income)
• F (09) = 06+2(07)+3(08)
6
• F (09) = 27+2(30)+3(35) = Rs.32 lakhs
6
Graphical Representation
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Line 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Line 1
S
A
L
E
S
S
A
L
E
S
No. Of years No. Of years
In lakhs In lakhs
Sales Graph of previous 8 Periods Sales Graph of 9 Periods including the forecasted year
Note : In Indian Rs.
Household (Middle level Income)
• F (09) = 06+2(07)+3(08)
6
• F (09) = 45+2(51)+3(55) = Rs.52 lakhs
6
Graphical Representation
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Line 1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Line 1
S
A
L
E
S
S
A
L
E
S
No. Of years No. Of years
Sales Graph of previous 8 Periods Sales Graph of 9 Periods including the forecasted year
In lakhs In lakhs
Commercial Industries
• F (09) = 06+2(07)+3(08)
6
• F (09) = 52+2(54)+3(60) = Rs.56.6 lakhs
6
Y=Y1+2Y2+3Y3/6IN LAKHS(RS.)5+2*7+3*9/6 7.67+2*9+3*12/6 10.19+2*12+3*16/6 13.512+2*16+3*20/617.316+2*20+3*24/621.320+2*24+3*27/624.824+2*27+3*30/6 2827+2*30+3*35/6 32
32
Y=Y1+2Y2+3Y3/6IN LAKHS(RS.)5+2*10+3*15/6 11.610+2*15+3*20/616.615+2*20+3*26/622.1620+2*26+3*35/629.526+2*35+3*39/635.535+2*39+3*45/641.339+2*45+3*51/6 4745+2*51+3*55/6 52
52
Y=Y1+2Y2+3Y3/6IN LAKHS(RS.)12+2*20+3*28/622.620+2*28+3*33/629.128+2*33+3*39/635.133+2*39+3*44/640.539+2*44+3*48/645.144+2*48+3*52/649.348+2*52+3*54/652.352+2*54+3*60/656.6
56.6
2005,2006&20072006,2007&2008Demand for 2009
1999,2000&20012000,2001&20022001,2002&20032002,2003&20042003,2004&20052004,2005&2006
TIME PERIOD
TIME PERIOD1999,2000&20012000,2001&20022001,2002&20032002,2003&20042003,2004&20052004,2005&20062005,2006&20072006,2007&2008Demand for 2009
WEIGHTED MOVING AVERAGE METHOD (FOR COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIES LEVEL)
WEIGHTED MOVING AVERAGE METHOD (FOR MIDDLE INCOME LEVEL)
WEIGHTED MOVING AVERAGE METHOD (FOR LOWER INCOME LEVEL)TIME PERIOD
1999,2000&20012000,2001&20022001,2002&20032002,2003&20042003,2004&20052004,2005&20062005,2006&20072006,2007&2008Demand for 2009
Graphical Representation
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Line 1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Line 1
Line 2
Line 3
Sales Graph of previous 8 Periods Sales Graph of 9 Periods including the forecasted year
S
A
L
E
S
S
A
L
E
S
No. Of yearsNo. Of years
In lakhs In lakhs
Sales (Rs.) Income
(000’s)
Price (Rs.) Inflation Rate Durability
(months)
5 30 100 .04 12
7 40 100 .04 12
9 50 120 .06 14
12 61 140 .05 14
16 70 170 .05 16
20 77 180 .08 16
24 88 200 .06 18
27 97 210 .07 20
30 102 220 .08 24
35 110 250 .12 24
F(09)= (-7.731)+(.080*120)+ (.107*250)+(-7-731*.12)+(.594*24)
Y= a+b1X1+b2x2..+bnXn
f(09)= Rs. 41.9 lakhs
Forecasting by Regression (lower level Income)
..\..\..\Desktop\lower level multiple regression• Open stat result
Forecasting by Regression (Middle level Income)
Sales (Rs. In LAKHS)
Income
(In LAKH’s)
Price (Rs.) Inflation Rate Durability
(months)
5 1 100 .04 12
10 1.2 100 .04 12
15 1.35 120 .06 14
20 1.55 140 .05 14
26 1.75 170 .05 16
35 1.90 180 .08 16
39 2 200 .06 18
45 2.4 210 .07 20
51 2.6 220 .08 24
55 2.8 250 .12 24
Y= a+b1X1+b2x2..+bnXn
F(09)= (-23.964)+(18.823*3)+ (.142*250)+(-15.365*.12)+(-.228`*24)
f(09)= Rs. 60.7 lakhs
..\..\..\Desktop\middle level multiple regression• Open stat result
Forecasting by Regression (Consumer industries )
Sales (Rs. In LAKHS)
Industry Growth
(In LAKH’s)
Price (Rs.) Inflation Rate Durability
(months)
12 .03 100 .04 12
20 .05 100 .04 12
28 .08 120 .06 14
33 .05 140 .05 14
39 .06 170 .05 16
44 .10 180 .08 16
48 .11 200 .06 18
52 .16 210 .07 20
54 .18 220 .08 24
60 .20 250 .12 24
Y= a+b1X1+b2x2..+bnXn
F(09)= (-.717)+(76.111*.24)+ (.334*250)+(-55.750*.12)+(-1.225*24)
f(09)= Rs. 64.95 lakhs
..\..\..\Desktop\commercial l multiple regression• Open stat result
Summary of forecasts
Targeted areas
Simple trend analysis
Moving average
Weighted average
Multiple regression
Lower level
37.2 30.6 32 41.9
Middle level
64.35 50.3 52 60.7
Con .indus.
73.72 55.3 56.6 64.95
Conclusion
• We would like to go with weighted average method as this gives maximum weight age to the recent trend and also its results are similar to the moving average method we can say that the forecasting can be some what accurate .
• For others method we are not taking in consideration because in simple trend only one variable defines the sales and we know that there are many other variables which define sales .. And for multiple regression the variables which we have taken consideration does not reflect the strong relation between the dependent and independent variables ..