market assessment on microtakaful in indonesia the executive
TRANSCRIPT
MARKET ASSESSMENT on Microtakaful in Indonesia
The Executive Summary
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This market assessment was carried out by the Deutsche Gesellschaft fur International Zusammenarbeit Regulatory Framework Promotion of Pro-poor Insurance Markets in Asia program (GIZ RFPI Asia), funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ). Its completion is made possible by the support of the Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK, Financial Services Authority) of Indonesia and the Asosiasi Asuransi Syariah Indonesia (Indonesia Syariah Insurance Association). GIZ RFPI Asia expresses its gratitude to colleagues from OJK and AASI who were instrumental in the design, implementation and evaluation of the results of this assessment. For further information, please contact: GIZ RFPI Asia Dr. Antonis Malagardis Program Director Insurance Commission Complex 1071 U.N. Avenue, Ermita, Manila Philippines 1000 T: +63 2 353 1044 -45 E: [email protected] OJK Moch. Muchlasin Directorate of Sharia Non Bank Financial Institutions Sumitro Joyohadikusumo Building 13FL Jl. Lapangan Banteng Timur 2-4 Jakarta Pusat 10710 T: +61 21-3858001 ext 21330 E: [email protected] AASI Srikandi Utami Vice Chairperson Graha Takaful Indonesia, Tower A, Fl. 2 Jl. Mampang Prapatan Kingdom No.100 South Jakarta 12970 T: 62-21 5289 0000 E: [email protected]
3
Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENT .............................................................. 2
ACRONYMS ............................................................................. 1
I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................... 2
A. Background ............................................................................... 2
B. Objectives of assessment .......................................................... 2
C. Survey Methodology .............................................................. 3
II. THE RISK PROFILES AND PERCEPTIONS OF LOW-INCOME MUSLIMS ................................................................................. 4
III. PERCEPTIONS AND UNDERSTANDING OF TAKAFUL5
A. Benefits ..................................................................................... 6
B. Eligibility .................................................................................... 6
C. Distinction of features ............................................................ 6
D. Payment modes ..................................................................... 7
IV. THE POTENTIAL MARKET FOR MICROTAKAFUL ...... 7
V. THE MICROTAKAFUL SUPPLY CHAIN ............................ 9
A. Microtakaful providers ............................................................... 9
B. Microtakaful distribution channels ............................................ 11
C. Existing microtakaful products ............................................. 13
D. Potential microtakaful product features ................................ 17
E. Partnerships in microtakaful market development ................... 18
VI. THE REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT FOR MICROTAKAFUL MARKET DEVELOPMENT ..................................................... 18
A. Prevailing regulatory issues ..................................................... 18
B. Industry perspectives on regulatory improvement needs ......... 20
VII. FINANCIAL LITERACY AND CONSUMER PROTECTION 21
VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS................................ 22
4
Table of Figures
Table 1. Ranking of Perceived Risks/Problems .................................... 4
Table 2. Demographic profile of microtakaful target market .................. 8
Table 3. Takaful operators ................................................................. 10
Table 4. Microtakaful products ........................................................... 13
Table 5. Proposed microtakaful product features ............................... 17
ACRONYMS
AASI Asosiasi Asuransi Syariah Indonesia (Indonesia Syariah
Insurance Association) BMT Baitul Maal wat Tamil (Islamic Cooperative) BPR Bank Perkreditan Rakyat (Rural Bank) BPRS Bank Pembiayaan Rakyat Syariah (Islamic Rural Bank) BTM Baitul Tamwil Muhammadiyah (Muhammadiyah Islamic
Cooperative) CSR Corporate Social Responsibility FGD Focused Group Discussion GIZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit
(GIZ) GmbH IMFI Islamic Microfinance Institution LKM Lembaga Keuangan Mikro (Microfinance Organization) MFI Microfinance Institution MI Microinsurance OJK Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (Financial Services Authority) PA Personal Accident RFPI Regulatory Framework Promotion of Pro-poor Insurance
Markets in Asia (RFPI Asia) UPK Unit Pengelola Keuangan (Financial Administrative Unit)
2
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Background
In many Islamic countries, significant portions of the population live in poverty and lack the access to financial services, such as insurance, that will help prevent the further worsening of their economic situations. In such countries as Indonesia, the creation of an appropriate market for insurance that is compliant with Islamic laws and that will cater to the low-income sector – a microtakaful market- is a need that is slowly gaining attention and priority. But while initial efforts have led to the development and offer of some microtakaful products, the pace of development needs speed and the approach needs concerted collaboration between the government and the industry. The current situation needs to be understood to inform the future progress of the microtakaful market.
B. Objectives of assessment
This executive summary highlights the results of a market assessment on microtakaful in Indonesia, conducted to contribute in the improvement of the regulatory and supervisory conditions for a conducive and favorable environment for the effective development of a microtakaful market that offers protection to the low-income Indonesians. The assessment analysed the existing and potential demand for microtakaful through the documentation of the socio-cultural, economic and demographic profiles, payment modes and frequency and product preferences of low-income respondents. The supply side of the market was also assessed, examining the supply chain that includes takaful operators, distribution channels and other relevant networks and support institutions. Moreover, the assessment describes the existing regulatory environment within which the market operates and the initiatives taken by the Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK, Financial Services Authority) to promote the market, particularly through financial literacy and consumer awareness. The market assessment ultimately aims to serve as a basis for the development of appropriate policies and regulations by the OJK and the development of microtakaful products and businesses by the members of the Asosiasi Asuransi Syariah Indonesia (Indonesia Syariah Insurance Association).
3
C. Survey Methodology
The microtakaful survey was qualitative in nature and primarily used Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) and interviews in addition to a secondary research review. FGDs also employed both individual and group risk ranking exercises. In total, 13 FGDs were facilitated in 4 provinces and in DKI Jakarta, consisting of 7 mixed gender groups, 3 groups of men only, and 3 groups of only women. Interviews with potential microtakaful clients were conducted in an additional 2 provinces and consisted of 22 non-in depth interviews, 4 in-depth interviews, and 3 group interviews. In order to benefit from the insights of those working directly with the low-income segment, we also conducted 25 interviews with staff from microfinance institutions (MFIs) and cooperatives, and 1 interview with a community leader. For additional information and triangulation, a short questionnaire was given to the staff of the MFIs and cooperatives visited. To gather industry data, we met with the Financial Services Authority (OJK), conducted 11 interviews with insurance professionals, had a small group discussion with Indonesia Syariah Insurance Association (AASI) members, and sent a questionnaire to all members of AASI.
The survey tried to capture the thoughts and attitudes concerning microtakaful from the low-income Muslim population as defined in the Grand Design for Microinsurance published by OJK as those with an income of less than IDR 2.5 million per month. In particular, we tried to capture the perspectives of low-income Muslims that constitute the following segments: conventional and Islamic MFIs, community groups not connected with and MFI or cooperatives, and farmers. Locations of the FGDs were determined based on the most recent BPS population and poverty data. Determining factors included the total Muslim population, total number of poor (BPS definition of poverty) percentage of poor, and population density. The primary focus on MFIs for FGDs and interviews was due to five reasons:
1. It is assumed that MFI members are in general a part of the low-
income population
2. MFIs have traditionally been a partner in piloting microinsurance
products around the world and represent a natural distribution
channel for microinsurance
3. There are MFIs in Indonesia which are currently partnering with
Takaful providers
4. Comparing the responses of low-income Muslims participating in
Islamic MFIs with those participating in conventional MFIs, and
5. MFIs provide a convenient way for gathering a group of members for
discussion.
4
Questionnaires for field staff were adapted from the research of Martin Hintz (2009, pp. 251-253) and questionnaires for AASI were adapted from the research of Anja Erlbeck (2010, pp. 71-76).
II. THE RISK PROFILES AND PERCEPTIONS OF LOW-INCOME MUSLIMS
Reiterating the results of past microinsurance surveys in Indonesia, this assessment identified the two main life events that determine the vulnerability of the poor to risk as illness and education expenses. Other factors that impact their risk vulnerability include daily living expenses, need for business capital/lump sums, occurrence of accidents and death. In contrast to past surveys, though, natural disasters were not identified as a major risk event or a common problem among those surveyed. While natural disasters were mentioned, they never made it high in the ranking of most burdensome problems.
Table 1. Ranking of Perceived Risks/Problems Ranking Method
Ranking of Risks/Problems
Ranking with cards
1. Illness 2. Education 3. Business Capital/lump
sums of money 4. Living Expenses 5. Death 6. Accident 7. Retirement 8. Motorcycle
9. House 10. Haji/Umroh 11. Business 12. Lebaran (Religious
Holiday) 13. Social Pressures 14. Poor Education
Facilities 15. Debt 16. Livestock
Ranking by hand
1. Illness 2. Education 3. Accident 4. Death & Fire (Business related)
Group ranking by discussion
1. Illness 2. Education 3. Living Expenses 4. Business Capital/Lump
sums of money 5. Accident 6. Death 7. Cost of Livestock
8. Business 9. Failed Harvest 10. Death of Livestock 11. Social Pressures
(invitations to community events)
12. Motor Cycle (Upkeep) 13. House Rent
5
III. PERCEPTIONS AND UNDERSTANDING OF TAKAFUL
Many of the assessment participants were not aware of takaful or Shariah-compliant insurance. Even so, after receiving some information about it, most of them expressed positive perception of takaful though they had never heard of it before. As Muslims, they assume that it is better to use takaful rather than regular insurance, but would like to know more about it first.
Those that had heard of takaful or Shariah-compliant insurance usually knew one of two things about it:
It is Halal, made specifically for Muslims and not associated with Riba.
It is similar to the approach of mutual organizations, with profit sharing.
Even some members of Islamic cooperatives that currently are using takaful
credit life products were not aware of the general concept of takaful/Shari’ah-
compliant insurance. The general lack of awareness greatly limited the
discussion of takaful products. After receiving some information on takaful,
questions and comments regarding the differences between takaful and
conventional insurance were raised. The highlights of the perceptions below
show that various factors influence the preference or aversion for takaful.
A few respondents still expressed preference for conventional
insurance due to the following reasons:
1. Past bad experience in Islamic banking
2. Perception of “takaful” as only a change in name, but with still the
same approach, which signals a “munafik” or hypocritical strategy
3. Lack of knowledge about takaful while abundant information about
conventional insurance makes for comfortable decision-making
4. Preference for a national product that everyone would feel
comfortable using and would not exclude anyone
The price and benefit of the product were the most important factors
for the preference or aversion for takaful, rather than its compliance or
non-compliance with Shari’ah rules. Some participant expressed
willingness to choose a takaful product over a conventional insurance
product if the price and benefits are good or better.
6
For those who preferred takaful products, the willingness to pay for the
additional premium range of IDR5, 000 to IDR10, 000 more per payment
period (month or year) was expressed. However, if offered a cheaper
conventional insurance product, preference was still for this cheaper product.
Still, some participants expressed the willingness to purchase takaful
even if the price were more expensive than the conventional insurance
product, as long as they are able to pay for it “mampu”.
Information was also received that some students and teachers at a local
Islamic boarding school would absolutely not purchase insurance unless it
was Shariah-compliant.
The table below lists the themes for which information seems to be highly needed by consumers, as evidence by some of the questions expressed in FGDs:
A. Benefits
Will I get my premiums back if I don’t have a claim?
If I am in an accident and receive the payout, but I haven’t paid in as
much as I receive, what happens?
Does the educational insurance pay directly to the school or to me?
If we have only paid health insurance premiums for a few months
and then get sick, are we covered?
Does insurance pay interest?
I can get my money back for educational insurance, why can’t I get it
back for health insurance?
If my loan is paid off before the term is up, do I get back any of my
premium/tabarugh?
B. Eligibility
What is the age limit?
C. Distinction of features
What’s the difference between conventional insurance and takaful?
Is there insurance for retirement?
What is covered for homeowners insurance?
How does disability insurance work?
Is there insurance for livestock?
Is insurance the same as saving?
7
Can insurance cover more than one risk at one time or only one risk
at a time?
D. Payment modes
If I die and the policy period is still not complete, who will continue payments?
Is it cheaper to pay per year, rather than per month?
Where does my money go if I don’t make any claims?
IV. THE POTENTIAL MARKET FOR MICROTAKAFUL
The potential microtakaful market is influenced by how “micro” is defined. Is the definition based on who the target consumers are - the unbanked or under banked? Can it be defined based on the product features that specifically target the poor? If so, who are the poor? Allianz has stated in its 2013 Half Year Report that the micro market is that which pertains to low-income individuals who are not the very poorest, but rather are those who live on $1.25 to $4 a day. This assessment has also documented that some Islamic Microfinance Institutions do not consider the very poor as ready to participate in profit-sharing Islamic credit models but are only participating as loan clients without the burden of profit-sharing, until they are ready to share with the profits. Perceptions from microfinance providers also highlight the micro market segment is not always perceived as poor, but rather those with unpredictable and unstable incomes. To restrict the definition of “micro” segment too much would result in the exclusion of those who would benefit from a takaful product, but who might not be ready to avail of one yet. The 2013 Millennium Development Goals report suggested that 60% of populations in the developing world live on less than $4 a day. The Indonesian population, as recorded in the 2010 census, is a total of 238,518,800 million people, hence if we generalize, there are approximately 143,111,280 people that live on less than $4 a day in Indonesia. In September of 2013, BPS data reported a total of 28,553,930 Indonesians living under the poverty line. If we take the Allianz definition and apply it to Indonesia, using the local poverty line measurement rather than $1.25, then the potential market for microinsurance is somewhere around 114,557,350 people which represents those living above the poverty line, but still on less
8
than $4 a day. Assuming that 86.1% of these people are Muslims (2000 census data), the specific low-income Muslim segment is a total of 98,633,878 people. This assessment has come up with a general overview of the profile of the potential target market for microtakaful (see Table 2).
Table 2. Demographic profile of microtakaful target market
Demographic Variables
Description Comments
▪ Occupation Agriculture, Informal Worker, Fishery, Small Business Owners
All occupational categories are potential customer but focused should be on agriculture and small business owners & cottage industries
▪ Awareness Low
However, as Muslims they are receptive to microtakaful because the assumption of it being a Halal product.
▪ Income/year
Seasonal/cyclical; Range between US 1.25 to US4 per day.143.1 million live less than US4/day.
Very low and unstable income, living on less than subsistence level.
▪ Affordability Ranges from IDR5,000 per week to IDR1,000,000 per month
The range is too wide and may opt for lower contribution depending on type of occupation and income sources.
▪ Education (Level %) Literacy 92.6 Target market falls
9
Primary 96 mainly in the primary educated group
Secondary 67.3
Tertiary 23.1
▪ Internet users or connectivity to urban and rural low income and poor
Mobile cellular subscription
97.7 for whole of Indonesia; the percentage of low income subscribers are not known
Residence Rural and urban
Promotion via cooperative
membership and rural banking and
through village post offices
▪ Accessibility to Infrastructure, services and facilities
28.5 million living under poverty line and poor
access to physical infrastructure
Cooperatives, rural banks and post offices are
the best distribution
channels given the widely dispersed
provinces
V. THE MICROTAKAFUL SUPPLY CHAIN
A. Microtakaful providers
Currently, there are two ways of selling licensed microtakaful products in Indonesia. First, microtakaful may be offered through full-fledged takaful operators. The market is currently comprised of five full-fledged takaful operators, three of which currently offer microtakaful products:
10
Table 3. Takaful operators
Takaful operators Status
1) PT Asuransi Takaful Keluarga (Life)
In partnership with TAKMIN, offers credit life, additional lives, motor, and PA microtakaful to a network of MFIs
2) PT Asuransi Takaful Umum (General)
No microtakaful products on offer yet
3) PT Al Amin, (Life) Offers an education microtakaful product
4) PT Amanah Githa (Life) In partnership with ASyKi and the Sidogiri Group of Islamic cooperative, offers life and PA microtakaful
5) PT Jaya Proteksi Takaful (General)
No microtakaful products on offer yet
The second way to sell licensed microtakaful products is through a takaful window. There are 17 life insurance companies and 23 general insurance companies that operate a takaful window, but only five of these sell microtakaful products. While many of the companies have microtakaful products planned in the pipeline, not many have officially registered their products with the OJK.
1. Allianz has been selling takaful credit life in partnership with MFIs.
2. Adira Insurance has a Syariah Dengue Fever Product with additional
products planned for offer.
3. Bumiputera offers a Syariah-compliant credit life product. They are
also partnering with ASyKi to provide a motorcycle protection
product. While not necessarily micro according to the Micro
Insurance Grand Design, BP has also recently launched a new
investment linked Syariah product for as little as IDR200, 000 per
month.
4. BRIngin Life offers both group and individual microtakaful products,
but has not really branded them as micro.
While there are companies that seem to be proactive in microtakaful product development, still other companies prefer to wait for the appropriate regulations before entering the market. The willingness to participate in the market, however, seems to be affected by concerns over the possibility of the phasing out of takaful windows in 2014 as initially raised by the Indonesian government. Indications, however,
11
are towards a later period if the windows are indeed to be phased out. One potential impact of this phasing out is that those offering takaful products through windows will be forced to operate as full-fledged takaful providers, even though they might not be organizationally equipped and performance might lead to failure.
B. Microtakaful distribution channels
Only a few of the existing insurance agents, brokers, microfinance institutions and cooperatives are documented as microtakaful distribution channels. The exact proportion of the 151 insurance brokers and 25 company-agents in Indonesia that currently offer microtakaful is unclear. One recent development is the establishment of a new broker which has a particular focus and interest on the microtakaful. Asuransi Syariah Keluarga Indonesia (ASyKi) is working towards collaborating with companies with a “micro character” and creating value for consumers through efficient claims payment services. ASyKI management believes that the company can respond to claims under IDR20 million within 1-2 days, and claims up to IDR70 million within a week. Both of ASyKi’s current products are being offered through scratch-off vouchers that can be activated by a mobile phone text message. Non-government organizations have played a crucial role in introducing and expanding the distribution of microtakaful to microfinance institutions. A well-documented success story is that of Peramu, a local NGO, which organized the microtakaful-focused working group TAKMIN to pilot initiatives in 2006 with the Islamic cooperative, UPK Ikhtiar in Bogor. TAKMIN is not an insurance broker, but served a similar capacity to link the company Family Takaful of Indonesia with a network of MFIs, including LKMs, BMTs and Islamic rural banks. This linkage resulted in 43 partnerships. While the Grand Design for Microinsurance specifically mentions MFIs as one of the main distribution channels of microtakaful, their legality in distribution seems to be interpreted differently in different regions in the country. Clarifying the understanding of the legal implications and guiding the potential distribution channels calls for action from OJK. Among commercial insurance companies, Allianz has taken the lead in tapping MFIs for microtakaful distribution. Other companies, such as AIG, Astra Buana, Sun Life, Prudential and Jaya Proteksi Takaful are also beginning to move towards selling microtakaful through MFIs, IMFIs, and cooperatives.
12
In the Islamic cooperative sector, BMT Sidogiri (Baitul Maal wat Tamwil) and BTM (Baitul Tamwil Muhammadiyah) are the leading Islamic cooperatives acting as microtakaful distribution channels. BMT Sidogiri, the largest Islamic cooperative in the country with 400,000 members, offers microtakaful by bundling it with their other financial products. BTM, a collection of 332 cooperatives, also offers microtakaful through a variety of partnership modes. As in other countries, mobile phone technology is being considered as a potential microtakaful distribution channel in Indonesia. Communications company Telkomsel has already explored the market by offering a short-term personal accident takaful product called Takaful Safari that can be purchased through SMS. A similar approach could be adopted for microtakaful in the future. The effective use of mobile phones as a microtakaful distribution channel, however, will rely on the resolution of some identified challenges. For example, air time deduction is not allowed by current regulations. Moreover, mobile money is still not a feasible option for the collection of premiums due to its low usage. Retail spaces are also viewed as potential distribution channels, but some challenges exist:
1. The stores are not allowed to promote the insurance product unless
it is one of the top ten products sold or if there is a special
promotion.
2. Giving a commission to the stores for selling the product is not
allowed. Competitions between stores for a prize may be used, but
is not believed to be effective.
3. Marketing costs will be expensive. While the costs can be shared
with the insurance company, it is an investment deemed too costly.
4. The minimart personnel are not fully knowledgeable about the
product and are not capable to explain properly to customers.
5. Data entry for registering the product takes a long while.
6. Connection to the internet across Indonesia is still not stable. The
instability could affect the Internet-linked registration system.
The Islamic Council of Indonesia (MUI) has recently been reinvigorating the religious practices in the country, requesting Muslim citizens to prioritize and
13
choose Shariah compliant entities, products and services, wherever possible. Hence, the preference should be for Islamic banks and halal minimarts, as an example. With this revival and the growth of crucial channels as BMTs, the future seems to hold great opportunities for microtakaful distribution channels .
C. Existing microtakaful products
At present, there are some 14 microtakaful products in the market which range from credit life, personal accident, motor, disability, education, and dengue takaful products.
Table 4. Microtakaful products
Provider Name of Product
Type Benefits Cost
PT. Asuransi Takaful Keluarga – in partnership with TAKMIN
TAKAFUL PEMBIAYAAN ( named by Takmin as “ Takaful Mikro Sakinah”)
Credit Life with option of additional lives
*outstanding loan balance is paid off if borrower dies *outstanding loan balance is paid off if spouse of borrower dies
Remitted monthly to the insurer: 0.05% per month on outstanding portion of the loan
Charge to insured: Single premium calculated and collected at the time of loan disbursement. The collected premium is 0.05% X term in months X initial loan amount
14
PT. Asuransi Takaful Keluarga – in partnership with TAKMIN
TAKAFUL AL KHAIRAT (named by Takmin as Takaful Ukhuwah Mikro)
Life and PA
IDR 1 million for natural death IDR 5 million for accident related death
IDR 20,000/year
PT. Asuransi Takaful Keluarga in partnership with Bank Muamalat
FulPROTEK Life, PA, Disability, and Accident healthcare
IDR5 million for natural death
IDR25 million for accident related death
IDR5 million accident related disability
IDR1.25 million for healthcare costs related to an accident
IDR175,000 per year with a minimum savings account balance of IDR100,000
Amanah Githa in partnership with ASyKi
Keluarga Mu’awanah
Life & PA Death benefit of IDR2.5 million if natural death and IDR5 million if accident related death for 1 year
IDR25,000/year
Al Amin AT TA’MIN Siswa - Plan Dinar
Life, PA, and health group product
IDR 6 million for accident related death or total disability
IDR 1 million for death from sickness
IDR 15,000/year
15
Other benefits for partial disability
IDR 400,000 for hospitalization
IDR 600,000 for outpatient care related to accident
Adira Dinamika
Asuransi Deman Berdarah Syariah
Dengue Fever
Covers up to IDR5 million for 1 year
IDR50,000/year
Bumiputera Syariah in partnership with ASyKi
Sepeda Motor Mu’awanah
Motorcycle Covers up to IDR7,500,000 if motor cycle is damaged or stolen for 1 year
IDR200,000/year
Allianz Payung Keluarga
Credit Life Takaful
Outstanding Loan Balance, Initial Loan Coverage, Funeral Benefit (proportional to loan or non-proportional to loan).
Depends on package chosen by MFI.
BRIngin Life Syariah
Purnadana Syariah
Life and PA
Pays a death benefit of IDR7.5 million for natural or accident related death while the policy is still active along
IDR200,000/3 months*
16
with profits from investment
BRingin Life Syariah
Group Life insurance and Pension Fund (for employees)
In the event of death:
a) Full coverage on initial loan amount
b) Coverage only on outstanding loan
Profit sharing, equivalent to 1.7% to 2.7% of financing at a minimum of 3million loan according to the 2 different benefits**
BMT Sidogiri
Tabungan Umum Syariah
Death Benefit packaged with savings
Pays a death benefit of IDR2 million
Free when savings account reaches IDR500,000 – costs are included in the profit sharing margins
BMT Sidogiri
Pembiayaan Credit Life Takaful
Covers outstanding loan balance up to IDR100 million
Free – costs are included in the profit sharing margins
BMT Sidogiri
Tabungan Qurban
Sacrifice Savings plan covered by Takaful
The BMT will provide the sacrificial goat or cow to the family of the saver in the event that he/she dies
Initial deposit of IDR50, 000 and monthly savings of IDR25, 000.
BMT Sidogiri
Tabungan Lembaga Peduli Siswa
Education Savings plan covered by Takaful
The BMT will pay the rest of the payments in the event that the saver dies. The
There is an initial deposit of IDR100, 000 to start the account and then monthly
17
family will also still get the promised payout for education costs.
payments of IDR50, 000. The Takaful premium of IDR3, 500 is paid by the BMT.
*This is not a standard product offering, but can be adjusted based on affordability and desired benefits. BRIngin Life offers a calculator online that can demonstrate possible payments. IDR200, 000 is the lowest premium amount available.
D. Potential microtakaful product features
While some microtakaful products are already on the market, improvements are still needed to address product voids. Below are features which future microtakaful products could hold:
Table 5. Proposed microtakaful product features
Characteristics Proposals Remarks
Coverage
Family inclusive of Education, Health, Accident, Credit life and Property takaful (based on priority)
It may be too expensive to offer health microtakaful singly and this could be
added on as a rider under the Family Takaful. May use the
Asuransi Sampah or Garbage Clinical Insurance model.
Property microtakaful should take into consideration the widespread ownership of motorcycles to offer motor
microtakaful.
Contribution (Price or Premium)
Range between IDR5,000 to IDR1million
Market is prone towards monthly and yearly
Medium range is between IDR6, 000/ weekly, IDR126,
272/mo, IDR130, 555/ quarter, IDR109, 166/yr.
18
Delivery channel
Post office, rural banks, agents,
insurance office & community groups and cooperatives
Post office is the most preferred channel according to the market survey followed
by rural banks, agents and cooperatives.
E. Partnerships in microtakaful market development
The industry seems cognizant of the fact that scale and market expansion can only be achieved through cooperation. The partner-agent approach seems to be the most commonly adopted and exemplified by insurance companies and microfinance institutions. The mutual benefits include the reach of MFIs in the low-income segment and the ease on administrative processes of the insurance companies, as the MFIs take over the roles of marketing and claims processing. Insurance companies, through their industry association, are also collaborating to expand the market. AASI is currently designing standardized microtakaful products that can be adopted and offered by the insurance companies. AASI members are also working with the Islamic banking sector to better market future products and improve reception by low-income Muslims. VI. THE REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT FOR MICROTAKAFUL MARKET DEVELOPMENT
A. Prevailing regulatory issues
The development of the microtakaful market is consistent with the government’s Grand Design for Microinsurance, but specific regulatory issues need further elaboration and possible issuance of decrees. Current regulatory practices on product registration are considered to be conducive to the market, with the process of product registration made quicker and more efficient. Product evaluations by OJK are done on a quarterly basis and it is expected that once a product is registered, selling can already commence. While there are no specific decrees for the registration of microtakaful products, Decree No. 422/KMK.06/2003 on the Business Conduct of Insurance and Reinsurance Companies currently apply.
19
The absence of a specific regulation encouraging rural banks as microtakaful distribution channels is an issue needing further discussion. At present, the Bank of Indonesia only allows both conventional (BPR) and Islamic (BPRS) rural banks to participate in a reference business model, and providing their clients access to insurance can only be possible through partnership with an insurance company (Surat Edaran bank Indonesia Nomor 12/35/DPNP). However, no regulation exists either that prohibits them from selling insurance directly to their clients. The OJK has clarified that the interpretation of the regulation on selling of insurance by banks is dependent on the regional authorities. This is still under discussion by authorities though no new regulation is being planned. As of January 2014, Indonesia has 163 Islamic banks with 402 branch offices and 1,636 conventional banks with 4,697 branch offices. The regulatory environment also needs to consider what is called the “Shariah risk”, whereby existing insurance models and product structures could later be considered as no longer compliant with Shariah laws. This risk has implications on the competitiveness of products and services in the future, whereby, if some are deemed no longer compliant and are subsequently eliminated, only a few choices would be left for consumers which could dangerously lead to poor product quality and service. Pawnshops, with its major potential for microtakaful distribution, are exposed to this Shariah risk, having only 637 Shariah compliant entities out of the total 4,000. Should the laws become more restrictive in the future and allow for only Shariah-compliant pawnshops to offer microtakaful, a significant number of channels will be lost. Minimarts are also exposed to this risk as these sell non-halal commodities, such as alcohol. Post offices, however, are safe because they do not sell anything non-halal. No data currently exists to document the volume of informal risk sharing/takaful schemes being operated. Neither the ministry of Cooperatives nor the OJK gathers information on this. It has been documented that some MFIs deduct 1% of member loans and allocates these into a risk fund which then serves to repay a deceased member’s loan. OJK has purposefully not made any restrictions on informal schemes to allow innovation and development within the cooperative segment. In the Grand Design for Microinsurance, informal schemes are not mentioned but it is understood from discussions that the regulatory body will oversee only those that sell and market registered microinsurance products. The aim is to prevent obstacles for cooperatives who can manage insurance/takaful
20
programs on their own, leaving room for the growth of informal takaful schemes as ‘Takaful in its true essence is a cooperative’.
B. Industry perspectives on regulatory improvement needs
Mandatory selling of insurance for low-income sector. All insurance companies should be required to sell a certain percentage of their portfolio as microinsurance. A portion of this would then be for microtakaful. For companies selling takaful, one out of ten of insurance policies sold should be mandated as a takaful product.
OJK leading financial literacy. Industry representatives believe that the regulator should lead awareness-raising and promotions for insurance/takaful literacy. The regulator is perceived to be in the best position to address the challenge of socialization.
Comprehensive regulatory guidance on defining microinsurance. While the definition of microinsurance has been loosely defined based on the premium ceiling of IDR 50,000 and sum assured ceiling of IDR 50,000,000, industry representatives expressed the need still for additional criteria as guidance for product registration. Some products in their portfolio might be priced cheaply, but are not designed for the low-income groups. It would seem inaccurate to register these as microinsurance products. A more comprehensive set of criteria would also apparently help insurance providers differentiate between their activities for corporate social responsibilities and for microinsurance portfolio development.
Complementation of microinsurance branding with existing products. Some insurance companies claim to have started offering microinsurance products even prior to the encouragement of the OJK. But with the heightened focus in its promotion, providers fear that the existing products will need to be redesigned or discouraged altogether. The industry representatives hope that any future microinsurance or microtakaful regulations will not deter products already on offer to the low-income sector.
Regulatory support to microtakaful distribution by banks. As there are still no clear regulations on the participation of banks in insurance selling, industry representatives believe that issuing a regulation to permit banks as distribution channels will push market growth. Some expressed that the Islamic banking industry should be
21
required to offer microtakaful products, especially if a standardized product is to be provided by AASI.
VII. FINANCIAL LITERACY AND CONSUMER PROTECTION
According to the country’s insurance law (UU No. 21 Tahun 2011), the OJK has the responsibility and authority to conduct activities to educate and protect consumers regarding financial services, including financial and insurance literacy initiatives. As provided for in the Grand Design for Microinsurance, and in line with the aforementioned insurance law, the OJK shall be promoting microinsurance, including microtakaful, through the following avenues:
Designation of October 17 of every year as Microinsurance Day
Proposal of the creation of a microinsurance education curriculum
Creation of microinsurance motto, logo and jingle for public promotion use
Creation of a microinsurance website
Establishment of a service center or hotline for microinsurance While no regulation is necessary to implement financial literacy for microinsurance, working agreements have been signed with such organizations as Kementerian Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal (KPDT), Badan Nasional Penempatan dan Perlindungan Tenaga Kerja Indonesia (BNP2TKI) and Technology University of Sumbawa (UTS) to jointly increase the level of financial literacy and consumer protection for microinsurance. Insurance literacy initiatives specifically designed for takaful are yet to be implemented. However, current initiatives of the Insurance Council of Indonesia (DAI) to promote insurance in general offer the opportunity for future integration of takaful and microtakaful themes. Some of these initiatives include:
1. Insurance Goes to Campus are visits to institutions to educate
college student about insurance. It also includes an e-learning
component.
22
2. The Grand Design for Insurance Education plans for activities as
road shows, insurance expositions, insurance literacy surveys, talent
competitions, and establishment of information centers, among
others.
3. Insurance Day celebration has been declared to be on 18th October,
as set during the 2006 East Asian Insurance Congress (EAIC).
Some insurance companies implement CSR programs that include a financial literacy component. But none focuses on Islamic financial literacy. VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
In summation, this excerpt of the assessment of the existing and potential market for microtakaful underscores the following:
Expenses incurred by illness and schooling are the main factors that
influence the vulnerability to risk by the participating Muslim
respondents. Natural disasters were not perceived as a high-ranking
risk event, though disasters place them in significant risk of
worsening poverty.
Awareness of takaful, in general, and microtakaful, in particular, is
still very low. This seems to affect decision-making for product
purchase, though the affordability of price and the significance of the
amount of the benefits are main determinants of preference between
conventional insurance and takaful insurance
To convince consumers to avail of takaful, information needs will
have to be addressed. In particular, consumers need to be informed
about eligibility, distinction of features (as compared to conventional
insurance), and payment modes.
Full-fledged takaful operators and takaful windows are the main
channels for selling licensed microtakaful products. While MFIS and
23
IMFIs have been tapped as distribution channels, there is ample
space for expansion of distribution channels, including pawnshops
and minimart
Issues about product registration, bank participation, and
persistence of compliance with Shariah rules are considered as main
concerns for the regulatory environment.
The insurance regulator, OJK, and the Insurance Council of
Indonesia are the main facilitators of financial literacy for
conventional insurance, microinsurance, and microtakaful.
The potential microtakaful market in Indonesia is indeed large and generally untapped.
The lack of information and understanding of takaful, and microtakaful, poses a challenge for both the regulator and the industry. But this is a challenge that, once overcome, could significantly contribute to market growth as numerous Indonesians shift from conventional insurance to microtakaful. But capacities will need to be developed for both insurance supervisors and microtakaful providers and distributors to jumpstart market expansion.
OJK will play an instrumental role to develop regulations that will encourage the participation of more providers in the market. In the short-term, a steep increase in partnerships for microtakaful distribution is to be expected as OJK encourages insurers to be more involved in the microtakaful market.