mann s · eurotimes ivolume 16/17 i issue 12/1 figure 7:aquesys ®implant 5. the ste mann...

1
1 Figure 4. Hydrus ® implant. Property 01 Ivantis ®, Inc II o.o!.-_I ~~ Figure 5. /oP (purpie) and medication use (light blue) in patients receiving both the Hydrus ® implant and cataract surgery concurrentlr. N=28 patients treated, with a loflow-up 0128/28 at three months and 20/28 at six months. Property 01 Ivantis ®, Inc. Figure 6: Stegmann ® Canal Expander visualised in the canal 01 Schlemm, gonioscopic view chamber, allowing for device-supported sub-conjunctival filtration (Figure 2). This stent was evaluated in a study by Maris et aJ.2,who compared ExPress mini-shunt implantation to classical trabeculectomy. While a similar postoperative intraocular pressure and surgical success rate was achieved, the incidence of early postoperative hypotony and related complications was significantly lower in patients who received the ExPress mini-shunt. 3. The iStent @ (Glaukos @) ~_~~ __ ~~~The iStent (Figure 3) is a surgical grade nonferromagnetic titanium trabecular micro-bypass system. It is inserted ab interno, bypassing the trabecular meshwork, and is placed into Schlernm's canal. The United States FDA IDE trial compared cataract surgery plus iStent to cataract surgery alone. The study found that 73 per cent of patients who had received an iStent maintained an intraocular press ure of 21 mmHg or lower without medication at 12 months' post-surgery, compared to only 50 per cent of those who underwent cataract surgery alone '. ~adeofa nickel titanium shape memory alloy (Figure 4). Suggested advantages of the device include excellent biocompatibility and elasticity. It is designed for insertion into Schlernm's canal ab interno. Preliminary data are promising thus far, as the results of a small cohort clinical trial indicate significant lowering of intraocular press ure and decreased reliance on glaucoma medications by six months' post-implant. These results were consistent and were seen both in patients who received only the implant and in patients who received the implant in combination with cataract surgery (Figure 5). EUROTIMES I Volume 16/17 I Issue 12/1 Figure 7: AqueSys ® implant 5. The Ste mann " Canal E ander The Stegmann • implant is made by the Ophthalmos • company in Switzerland. The stent is composed of polyimide and has a tube multi-fenestrated skeleton structure designed to expand Schlemm's canal (Figure 6). Initial data suggest pressure-Iowering effects at least similar to the published data of viscocanalostomy. 6. The AqueS s" implant ~ioIoIii!lil!illiJii!illiliUii;tl"'iIi!iIllillllll~.ThiS is the only biological implant, designed to ren der minimally invasive surgery for subconjunctival fenestration. The implant is composed of a collagen tube with an inner diameter of around 65mm and can be placed with a special inserter ab interno (Figure 7). Early clinical study data is promising. _ The field of new glaucoma devices and surgical technology today is rapidly developing and a lot of clinical research is on the way. Hopefully these innovations will help to render safer and more standardised surgical technologies for the eure of the challenging disease of glaucoma. Acknowledgements Support was provided by the Vanderbift Medical Scholars program, Vanderbift University, Nashvifle, TN, USA Relerences I. Lewis RA, von Wolff K, Tetz M, Koerber N, Kearney JR, Shingleton BJ, and Samuelson TW. Canaloplasty: Three-year resufts 01 circumlerential viscodilation and tensioning 01 Schlemm canal using a microcatheter to treat open-angle glaucoma. JCRS. Vol. 37, Issue 4, pp. 682-690, Apri/2011. 2. Maris PJ Jr, Ishida K, Netland PA. Comparison 01 trabeculectomy with Ex-Press miniature glaucoma device implanted under scleral ffap. J Glaucoma. 2007;16.'14-19. 3. Spiegel D, Wetzel W, Neuhann T, Stuermer J, Hoeh H, Garcia- Feijoo J, et al. Coexistent primary open-angle glaucoma and cataracl: interim analysis 01 a trabecular micro-bypass stent and concurrent cataract surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009;19:393-9.

Upload: others

Post on 06-Mar-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: mann s · EUROTIMES IVolume 16/17 I Issue 12/1 Figure 7:AqueSys ®implant 5. The Ste mann "Canal E ander The Stegmann •implant ismade bythe Ophthalmos •company in Switzerland

1

Figure 4. Hydrus ® implant. Property 01 Ivantis ®, Inc

I Io.o!.-_I ~~

Figure 5. /oP (purpie) and medication use (light blue) inpatients receiving both the Hydrus ® implant and cataract surgery

concurrentlr. N=28 patients treated, with a loflow-up 0128/28 atthree months and 20/28 at six months. Property 01 Ivantis ®, Inc.

Figure 6: Stegmann ® Canal Expandervisualised in the canal 01

Schlemm, gonioscopic view

chamber, allowing for device-supportedsub-conjunctival filtration (Figure 2). Thisstent was evaluated in a study by Maris etaJ.2,who compared ExPress mini-shuntimplantation to classical trabeculectomy.While a similar postoperative intraocularpressure and surgical success ratewas achieved, the incidence of earlypostoperative hypotony and relatedcomplications was significantly lower inpatients who received the ExPressmini-shunt.

3. The iStent @ (Glaukos @)~_~~ __ ~~~TheiStent (Figure 3) is a surgical gradenonferromagnetic titanium trabecularmicro-bypass system. It is inserted abinterno, bypassing the trabecular meshwork,and is placed into Schlernm's canal. TheUnited States FDA IDE trial comparedcataract surgery plus iStent to cataractsurgery alone. The study found that 73 percent of patients who had received an iStentmaintained an intraocular press ure of 21mmHg or lower without medication at 12months' post-surgery, compared to only 50per cent of those who underwent cataractsurgery alone '.

~adeofanickel titanium shape memory alloy (Figure4). Suggested advantages of the deviceinclude excellent biocompatibility andelasticity. It is designed for insertion intoSchlernm's canal ab interno. Preliminarydata are promising thus far, as the resultsof a small cohort clinical trial indicatesignificant lowering of intraocular press ureand decreased reliance on glaucomamedications by six months' post-implant.These results were consistent and wereseen both in patients who received onlythe implant and in patients who receivedthe implant in combination with cataractsurgery (Figure 5).

EUROTIMES I Volume 16/17 I Issue 12/1

Figure 7: AqueSys ® implant

5. The Ste mann "Canal E anderThe Stegmann • implant is made by theOphthalmos • company in Switzerland. Thestent is composed of polyimide and has atube multi-fenestrated skeleton structuredesigned to expand Schlemm's canal (Figure6). Initial data suggest pressure-Ioweringeffects at least similar to the published dataof viscocanalostomy.

6. The AqueS s" implant~ioIoIii!lil!illiJii!illiliUii;tl"'iIi!iIllillllll~.ThiSis the only biological implant, designedto ren der minimally invasive surgery forsubconjunctival fenestration. The implantis composed of a collagen tube with aninner diameter of around 65mm and canbe placed with a special inserter ab interno(Figure 7). Early clinical study data ispromising.

_ The field of new glaucomadevices and surgical technology today israpidly developing and a lot of clinicalresearch is on the way. Hopefully theseinnovations will help to render safer andmore standardised surgical technologiesfor the eure of the challenging disease ofglaucoma.

AcknowledgementsSupport was provided by the Vanderbift Medical Scholars

program, Vanderbift University, Nashvifle, TN, USA

RelerencesI. Lewis RA, von Wolff K, Tetz M, Koerber N, Kearney JR,

Shingleton BJ, and Samuelson TW. Canaloplasty: Three-yearresufts 01 circumlerential viscodilation and tensioning 01Schlemm canal using a microcatheter to treat open-angleglaucoma. JCRS. Vol. 37, Issue 4, pp. 682-690, Apri/2011.

2. Maris PJ Jr, Ishida K, Netland PA. Comparison 01trabeculectomy with Ex-Press miniature glaucoma deviceimplanted under scleral ffap. J Glaucoma. 2007;16.'14-19.

3. Spiegel D, Wetzel W, Neuhann T, Stuermer J, Hoeh H, Garcia-Feijoo J, et al. Coexistent primary open-angle glaucomaand cataracl: interim analysis 01 a trabecular micro-bypassstent and concurrent cataract surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol.2009;19:393-9.