mania for treatment

1
Editorial New Science Publications Editor Jeremy Webb Personal Asst & Office Manager Anita Staff Associate Editors Liz Else, Stephanie Pain News Editor Matt Walker Editors Linda Geddes, Rowan Hooper, Anil Ananthaswamy, Helen Knight Tel +44 (0) 20 7611 1260 Fax +44 (0) 20 7611 1250 Reporters LONDON Andy Coghlan, Hazel Muir, Paul Marks, Zeeya Merali [email protected] BOSTON US Bureau Chief Ivan Semeniuk David L. Chandler [email protected] Celeste Biever [email protected] Gregory T. Huang [email protected] SAN FRANCISCO Bureau Chief Peter Aldhous [email protected] Michael Reilly [email protected] TORONTO Alison Motluk [email protected] BRUSSELS Debora MacKenzie [email protected] MELBOURNE Australasian Editor Rachel Nowak [email protected] Features Editors Ben Crystall, Kate Douglas, Clare Wilson, David Cohen, Graham Lawton, Valerie Jamieson, Michael Le Page, Caroline Williams Features Assistant Celia Guthrie Tel +44 (0) 20 7611 1201 Fax +44 (0) 20 7611 1280 [email protected] Opinion Editor Jo Marchant Editors John Hoyland, Amanda Gefter, Alison George, Eleanor Harris Tel +44 (0) 20 7611 1240 Fax +44 (0) 20 7611 1280 [email protected] Researcher Lucy Middleton Editorial Assistant Nick Christensen Production Editor Mick O’Hare Asst Production Editor Melanie Green Chief Sub John Liebmann Subeditors Vivienne Greig, Ben Longstaff, Julia Brown, Barbara Kiser, Sean O’Neill Art Editor Alison Lawn Design Craig Mackie, Michelle Ofosu Graphics Nigel Hawtin, Dave Johnston Pictures Adam Goff Tel +44 (0) 20 7611 1268 Fax +44 (0) 20 7611 1250 Careers Editor Richard Fisher [email protected] Tel +44 (0) 20 7611 1248 Fax +44 (0) 20 7611 1280 Consultants Alun Anderson, Stephen Battersby, Michael Bond, Michael Brooks, Marcus Chown, Rob Edwards, Richard Fifield, Barry Fox, Mick Hamer, Jeff Hecht, Bob Holmes, Justin Mullins, Fred Pearce, Helen Phillips, Ian Stewart, Gail Vines, Gabrielle Walker, Emma Young Press Office and Syndication UK Claire Bowles Tel +44 (0) 20 7611 1210 Fax 7611 1250 US Office Tel +1 617 386 2190 NEWSCIENTIST.COM Online Publisher John MacFarlane Online Editor Damian Carrington Deputy Online Editor Shaoni Bhattacharya, Gaia Vince Editors Maggie McKee, Will Knight Reporters Tom Simonite, Roxanne Khamsi, Kelly Young, David Shiga, Catherine Brahic [email protected] Online Subeditor Dan Palmer Web team Neela Das, Michael Suzuki, Cathy Tollet, Ruth Turner, Vivienne Griffith, Rohan Creasey WHEN the prevalence of a medical condition leaps fivefold in eight years and it is not an infectious disease, something strange is going on. That is what has happened to childhood bipolar disorder in the US. The increase is not mirrored in other countries and there is no consensus among US doctors over the cause of the rise. Alarm bells are ringing. Bipolar disorder used to be called manic depression. Over many months patients swing between extreme emotional highs and lows. Until a decade ago it was an exclusively adult disease whose diagnosis required serious symptoms, including hospitalisation for mania. Today in the US children as young as 3 are being diagnosed, often based on the observations of worried parents. Suggested reasons for the rise are many and contentious. They range from a broadening of the definition of bipolar disorder, to the trend of viewing everyday behavioural difficulties as a medical problem (see page 6). In the background is, as ever, a pharmaceutical industry that encourages drugs to be taken up for a broader range of disorders and by new patient groups (New Scientist, 15 April 2006, p 38). There is no doubt that plenty of misdiagnosis is going on. One US paediatric psychiatrist told New Scientist that only 18 per cent of children referred for a second opinion actually had bipolar disorder. Similar results are reported by other specialists. Nor is it a surprise that diagnosis is difficult. Many of the symptoms of bipolar disorder are shared with other psychiatric problems, notably attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Children can also have atypical symptoms: swinging between moods within an hour, for example. More worrying is the growing evidence that children diagnosed with bipolar disorder do not suffer from the disease as adults, suggesting that the adult and childhood conditions are not the same. Despite this, children with bipolar disorder are given potent anti-psychotic and anti-convulsant drugs similar to those used to treat adults. These come with serious side effects and an increased risk of premature death. Do children benefit from their treatment? Only small studies have been conducted and the evidence is equivocal, especially for judging long-term outcomes. The diagnosis and treatment of bipolar disorder in American children is evidently in a mess. It may be that doctors have identified a group of overlooked children who would benefit from treatment, but the evidence is too scant to tell. In the meantime, children are being given dangerous mind- altering drugs. For their sake, the doubts over bipolar disorder needs to be resolved, and quickly. NICO the robot has joined the illustrious club of humans, chimps, elephants and dolphins in being able to recognise himself in a mirror. Another automaton, Leonardo, now has the ability to see the world from another’s perspective – a primitive theory of mind. It seems that artificial intelligence is at last making inroads into the things that really make us human (see page 30). Or is it? Critics argue that these skills are just clever parlour tricks and that even a slight change in the robots’ situations while they perform these tasks will leave them all at sea. Unlike a chimp or a young child, they are missing the rest of the consciousness package that would let them generalise and improvise. That much is true, but modelling individual human-like skills has other values. For example, it can reveal whether a particular human trait is simple to reproduce or can only be created by complex means. It can give cognitive scientists a steer for how the human brain completes certain tasks, and most directly it may give robots useful new talents. We can expect robots to master other human hallmarks, from deceit and empathy to lie detection and even emotions. By understanding more about how to recreate these individual traits, the hope is that they will point researchers towards the glue that holds them all together: what is needed to create a conscious entity. Bring on the happy robot. Marvin the paranoid android may be fiction... Mania for treatment Are doctors rushing to judgement over childhood bipolar disorder? www.newscientist.com 19 May 2007 | NewScientist | 3

Upload: donguyet

Post on 30-Dec-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Editorial–New Science Publications

Editor Jeremy Webb

Personal Asst & Office Manager Anita Staff

Associate Editors

Liz Else, Stephanie Pain

News Editor Matt Walker

Editors Linda Geddes, Rowan Hooper,

Anil Ananthaswamy, Helen Knight

Tel +44 (0) 20 7611 1260

Fax +44 (0) 20 7611 1250

Reporters

LONDON Andy Coghlan, Hazel Muir,

Paul Marks, Zeeya Merali

[email protected]

BOSTON

US Bureau Chief Ivan Semeniuk

David L. Chandler

[email protected]

Celeste Biever

[email protected]

Gregory T. Huang

[email protected]

SAN FRANCISCO

Bureau Chief Peter Aldhous

[email protected]

Michael Reilly

[email protected]

TORONTO Alison Motluk

[email protected]

BRUSSELS Debora MacKenzie

[email protected]

MELBOURNE

Australasian Editor Rachel Nowak

[email protected]

Features Editors Ben Crystall,

Kate Douglas, Clare Wilson, David Cohen,

Graham Lawton, Valerie Jamieson,

Michael Le Page, Caroline Williams

Features Assistant Celia Guthrie

Tel +44 (0) 20 7611 1201

Fax +44 (0) 20 7611 1280

[email protected]

Opinion Editor Jo Marchant

Editors John Hoyland, Amanda Gefter,

Alison George, Eleanor Harris

Tel +44 (0) 20 7611 1240

Fax +44 (0) 20 7611 1280

[email protected]

Researcher Lucy Middleton

Editorial Assistant Nick Christensen

Production Editor Mick O’Hare

Asst Production Editor Melanie Green

Chief Sub John Liebmann

Subeditors Vivienne Greig, Ben Longstaff,

Julia Brown, Barbara Kiser, Sean O’Neill

Art Editor Alison Lawn

Design Craig Mackie, Michelle Ofosu

Graphics Nigel Hawtin, Dave Johnston

Pictures Adam Goff

Tel +44 (0) 20 7611 1268

Fax +44 (0) 20 7611 1250

Careers Editor Richard Fisher

[email protected]

Tel +44 (0) 20 7611 1248

Fax +44 (0) 20 7611 1280

Consultants Alun Anderson,

Stephen Battersby, Michael Bond,

Michael Brooks, Marcus Chown,

Rob Edwards, Richard Fifield, Barry Fox,

Mick Hamer, Jeff Hecht, Bob Holmes,

Justin Mullins, Fred Pearce, Helen Phillips,

Ian Stewart, Gail Vines, Gabrielle Walker,

Emma Young

Press Office and Syndication

UK Claire Bowles

Tel +44 (0) 20 7611 1210 Fax 7611 1250

US Office

Tel +1 617 386 2190

NEWSCIENTIST.COM

Online Publisher John MacFarlane

Online Editor Damian Carrington

Deputy Online Editor Shaoni

Bhattacharya, Gaia Vince

Editors Maggie McKee, Will Knight

Reporters Tom Simonite, Roxanne Khamsi,

Kelly Young, David Shiga, Catherine Brahic

[email protected]

Online Subeditor Dan Palmer

Web team Neela Das, Michael Suzuki,

Cathy Tollet, Ruth Turner,

Vivienne Griffith, Rohan Creasey

WHEN the prevalence of a medical condition

leaps fivefold in eight years and it is not an

infectious disease, something strange is going

on. That is what has happened to childhood

bipolar disorder in the US. The increase is not

mirrored in other countries and there is no

consensus among US doctors over the cause

of the rise. Alarm bells are ringing.

Bipolar disorder used to be called manic

depression. Over many months patients

swing between extreme emotional highs and

lows. Until a decade ago it was an exclusively

adult disease whose diagnosis required

serious symptoms, including hospitalisation

for mania. Today in the US children as young

as 3 are being diagnosed, often based on the

observations of worried parents.

Suggested reasons for the rise are

many and contentious. They range from

a broadening of the definition of bipolar

disorder, to the trend of viewing everyday

behavioural difficulties as a medical

problem (see page 6). In the background is,

as ever, a pharmaceutical industry that

encourages drugs to be taken up for a broader

range of disorders and by new patient groups

(New Scientist, 15 April 2006, p 38).

There is no doubt that plenty of

misdiagnosis is going on. One US paediatric

psychiatrist told New Scientist that only 18 per

cent of children referred for a second opinion

actually had bipolar disorder. Similar results

are reported by other specialists.

Nor is it a surprise that diagnosis is

difficult. Many of the symptoms of bipolar

disorder are shared with other psychiatric

problems, notably attention deficit

hyperactivity disorder. Children can also have

atypical symptoms: swinging between moods

within an hour, for example.

More worrying is the growing evidence

that children diagnosed with bipolar disorder

do not suffer from the disease as adults,

suggesting that the adult and childhood

conditions are not the same. Despite this,

children with bipolar disorder are given

potent anti-psychotic and anti-convulsant

drugs similar to those used to treat adults.

These come with serious side effects and an

increased risk of premature death.

Do children benefit from their treatment?

Only small studies have been conducted and

the evidence is equivocal, especially for

judging long-term outcomes.

The diagnosis and treatment of bipolar

disorder in American children is evidently

in a mess. It may be that doctors have

identified a group of overlooked children

who would benefit from treatment, but the

evidence is too scant to tell. In the meantime,

children are being given dangerous mind-

altering drugs. For their sake, the doubts

over bipolar disorder needs to be resolved,

and quickly. ●

NICO the robot has joined the illustrious club

of humans, chimps, elephants and dolphins in

being able to recognise himself in a mirror.

Another automaton, Leonardo, now has the

ability to see the world from another’s

perspective – a primitive theory of mind. It

seems that artificial intelligence is at last

making inroads into the things that really

make us human (see page 30).

Or is it? Critics argue that these skills are

just clever parlour tricks and that even a slight

change in the robots’ situations while they

perform these tasks will leave them all at sea.

Unlike a chimp or a young child, they are

missing the rest of the consciousness package

that would let them generalise and improvise.

That much is true, but modelling

individual human-like skills has other

values. For example, it can reveal whether

a particular human trait is simple to

reproduce or can only be created by complex

means. It can give cognitive scientists a steer

for how the human brain completes certain

tasks, and most directly it may give robots

useful new talents.

We can expect robots to master other

human hallmarks, from deceit and empathy

to lie detection and even emotions. By

understanding more about how to recreate

these individual traits, the hope is that they

will point researchers towards the glue that

holds them all together: what is needed

to create a conscious entity. Bring on the

happy robot. ●

Marvin the paranoid android may be fiction...

Mania for treatmentAre doctors rushing to judgement over childhood bipolar disorder?

www.newscientist.com 19 May 2007 | NewScientist | 3

070519_R_Editorial.indd 3070519_R_Editorial.indd 3 15/5/07 5:21:52 pm15/5/07 5:21:52 pm