management effectiveness assessment for the for the marine protected areas of the of the greater st...
TRANSCRIPT
Management Effectiveness Management Effectiveness
AssessmentAssessment
for the for the
Marine Protected AreasMarine Protected Areas
of the of the
Greater St Lucia Wetland ParkGreater St Lucia Wetland Park
Jean HarrisEzemvelo KwaZulu-Natal Wildlife
SOUTH AFRICA
SOUTH AFRICA
KwaZulu-Natal
Greater StLucia Wetland
Park
Monitoring and Managing for Success in
World Natural Heritage Areas one of 10 project sites
Africa, South Asia and South America
World Commission on Protected Areas
(WCPA) Framework
for Assessing Protected AreaManagement Effectiveness
MPAs
WWF
ENHANCING OUR HERITAGEMonitoring and Managing for Success in
Natural World Heritage Sites
GREATER ST LUCIA
WETLAND PARK
SOUTH AFRICA
- Draft Report -Initial Management Effectiveness Report
August 2003
Contextoverview
Assessment
* Benefits
* Challenges
* Issues
Greater St Lucia
Wetland Park
Composite of 16 areas:14 protected areas2 MPAs
289376 ha
SouthAfrica
Swaziland
World Heritage Site1999
MaputalandMPA
St LuciaMPA
Nominated for* Ecological Processes * Natural phenomena * Biodiversity (& endangered spp)
Greater St Lucia Wetland Park
Provides imperative to
conserve and enhancing the World Heritage values present in the park;
optimize nature-based tourism development;
promote the empowerment and development of historically disadvantaged communities in and adjacent to the park; and
protect the park’s natural and cultural heritage through effective management, governance, legislative, regulatory and institutional arrangements
South AfricanWorld Heritage Convention Act (1999) - to support WH values
Also requiresIntegrated Management Plan (IMP)
Chief Executive
Officer
Chief Executive
Officer
Commercial Development :
Tourism
Commercial Development :
Tourism
Social & Economic Development
Social & Economic Development Conservation Conservation
BoardBoard
National Minister DEAT
National Minister DEAT
KZN WILDLIFEKZN WILDLIFE
MARINE & COASTALMANAGEMENT
legislation
GSLWPWorld Heritage Site
AUTHORITY
ManagementManagementSystemsSystems
Site Complexity
Marine & terrestrial
MPA ME assessment - challengesPart of a
WorldHeritage
SiteBio-cult-social-econ
VALUES
Clarification of Whywe do
What we doWhen
Site partner co-operation
MPA MEAssessment
Benefits
VALUES TARGETS
Threatened species Black rhino & white rhino(rare, endangered, red data, vulnerable) Elephant
humpback whalesLeopardRed DuikerBrown hyenaBatsAfrican Wild CatSunioribiTonga Red SquirrelSamango monkeyCrocodileTurtles (Leatherback and Loggerhead)Dolphins (Humpback bottlenose)WhalesWhale SharkGreat white sharkServalPlantsBirdsReptilesInsectsCoelacanthButterfliesReef fishChitonsCowriesCycads
What are you managing?
What condition is it in?
MPA MEAssessment
Benefits
Why do you do what you do?
VALUES TARGETSTARGET
Weighting
TARGET CONDITION
(state)
STRESS PRESSURES
InbreedingFood
scarcity
Low breeding success
Disturbance at sensitive stage in life-
history (breeding)
Threatened species
Black rhino & white rhino 5 2 0 0 0Elephant 5 1 0 0 0humpback whales 8 0 0 0 0Leopard 6 0 0 0 0Red Duiker 9 1 0 0 0Brown hyena 2 2 0 2 0Bats 6 0 0 0 0African Wild Cat 2 0 0 0 0Suni 4 1 0 0 0oribi 2 0 3 1 0Tonga Red Squirrel 7 0 0 0 0Samango monkey (sp!) 6 1 1 0 0
Crocodile 3 0 0 0 3
Value (management objective): Threatened species
Pressure severity
Why do you do what you do?
Focal Management Targets
Conservation Values
• Biodiversity
• Endangered & Threatened Species
• Ecological Processes
• Natural Resources
MPA MEAssessment
Benefits
Social / Cultural Values
• Landscapes
• Cultural Heritage
• Local Community
Empowerment
Other Values
• Tourism
• Management and Governance
• Education and Research
INDICATORS
Biophysical Social & cultural
MPA MEAssessment
Challenges30 Focal Management Targets
Bio-cult-social-econVALUES
Speaking the language
Paper – scissor – rock
Integration and sustainability
Buy-in
Site managersCapacity, core business & add-ons
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT PLAN-Management objectives & values-Threats and strategies
Timing
Management phase
Identify, confirm and prioritize VALUESIdentify, confirm and prioritize TARGETS for each value
Set long-term management GOALS, standards & policiesAuthority, Park Conservation Managers, Consultative for a & IAPs
Evaluate STATE of targets
Identify & evaluate magnitude of
current PRESSURES
Stress & Source
Identify potential STRATEGIES
to mitigate priority pressures & threats
(actions to repair or prevent)
State vs. pressureMATRIX
Prioritize pressures
IMPLEMENT MANAGEMENT
Implement priority actionsDay-to-day activities
Management Effectiveness
Cycle
Identify & assess magnitude of
THREATS
OPERATIONAL PLANSet short-term (<1yr) management goals
Determine priority strategiesIdentify priority activities & methodologies
Annual/bi-annual management meetings
MONITORIndicators of
pressure magnitude
MONITORIndicators of target state
Identify INDICATORSof target state
& pressure magnitude
PLANACT
ASSESS
MO
NIT
OR
5-ye
ar c
ycle
1-ye
ar c
ycle
at e
stab
lish
men
t, le
gisl
ated
IMPC
OP
Thank you!