making the business case for intelligent transport systems in the highways agency brian harbord...

16
Making the Business Case for Intelligent Transport Systems in the Highways Agency Brian Harbord Intelligent Transport Systems Research Group Highways Agency, UK

Upload: angelica-reynolds

Post on 26-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Making the Business Case for Intelligent Transport Systems in the

Highways Agency

Brian HarbordIntelligent Transport Systems Research Group

Highways Agency, UK

Business Case or Model?

• Business Case – WHY something is worth doing• Limited funds & other resources

• Compares cost and benefits/disbenefits (>>BCR)

• Usually for a project or programme of work

• Confirms the need (and ownership)

• Demonstrates value for money

• Prioritisation of alternative solutions

• Foundation of the business model

Business Case or Model?

• Business Model – HOW something can be done• “Framework for creating value”

• Public or Commercial Service

• Example models• Razor and blades (bait and hook)

• Pyramid scheme

• McDonalds – fast/cheap food, consistent “quality”

• Usually (but not always) based on business case(s)• Beijing Olympics?

Business Cases in the UK

• Business cases key element of all Government procurement

• NHS – NICE

• OGC – Office of Government Commerce

• Treasury guidance – “Green Book”

• Business cases for ITS – a brief history, with examples.

Business Cases for Roads?

• 1956 – M6 first motorway

• MOT Business model >> roads vs rail

• Business Case?

• Now COBA

Early ITS

• 1959 – first ERT

• 1960s – first signals

• Ministerial decree – justify by accidents/safety

Early ITS Business Cases

• 1970s – Increasing cost of ITS, benefits questioned

• 1978 – Autowarn• Pilot on M4 successful

• No business case for wider deployment

Early ITS Business Cases

• 1980s – ramp metering, variable speed limits, M1 AID• Treasury doubts over trials/assessment

• Stricter controls on evaluation/business case

• Research >> trial/pilot >> standard/deployment

• Assessment should be independent

• Results >95% confidence level

• Resulted in long, expensive trials

• HA/NAO – Guide to Pilots and Trials

Basis of Guidance

• Late 1980s – research showed potential of ITS

• 1990 – M25 Review/M25 Action Plan• Improved signals/automatic operation

• Queue protection (AIDS >> MIDAS)

• Controlled motorways

• Ramp metering

• Driver information (RTTI)

• Business cases based on safety and congestion

Example 1 - Controlled Motorways

• Early ’90s – computer modelling > business case

• 1995 – one year trial (including RTA/SpeedAlert)

• 1997 – indications of benefits – safety & JT

• Trial > operational system, monitoring continues

• 1999 – safety benefits confirmed but +/- 25%

• 2000/02 – scheme extension

• 2005 – benefits confirmed @ 95% confidence...similar (but longer) story for ramp metering

Example 2 – Driver Information (RTTI)

• 1980s – DfT business model – private sector

• 1991 – business case for RTCC and NTIC

• Kent Corridor Pilot (PLEIADES) – VMS based

• TIH – sharing of private and HA traffic data

• MDIS – strategic VMS based

• 2001 – NTCC launched• Initially VMS, but developed alternative delivery

mechanisms (Traffic England, HANET, HA Radio, etc)

RTTI – the Business Case?

0 100

JT

Things are Getting Better for ITS?

• 2000 – Triple Package Business Case

• Later same year - Ten Year Plan• ATM – hardshoulder running

• Regional Control Centres

• “Roles & Responsibilities” Review

• All had good business cases, but did not fit Agency business model, then...

• White Friday >> HA as Network Operator

Agency as Network Operator

• Business case previously based on safety, congestion and environmental impact

• New target – journey time reliability (AVDs)

• Traffic Officer Service/Incident Management

• ‘Relaxed’ approach to business cases

• M42 ATM pilot results (safety vs capacity)

• 2007 – ATM Feasibility Study (sustainability)

• 2008 - Managed Motorway programme

European R & D Business Cases

• EC funded R & D programmes rarely deliver business case for UK deployment

• Insufficient duration/data collection

• Lack of rigour

• Lack of independence

• Traffic and other conditions not representative of UK

Discussion?

Thanks for Listening