magnetite and hematite alteration proxies from 3d gravity ... proxies.pdf · mineral systems...

21
Magnetite and Hematite Alteration Proxies from 3D Gravity and Magnetic Inversion Mapping IOCG-related alteration James Goodwin and Roger Skirrow

Upload: others

Post on 12-Mar-2020

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Magnetite and Hematite Alteration Proxies

from 3D Gravity and Magnetic Inversion

Mapping IOCG-related alteration

James Goodwin and Roger Skirrow

Mineral Systems Approach

The aim of this study is to predict the presence of hydrothermal alteration

systems associated with iron-oxide-copper-gold (IOCG) deposits.

Host rocks in the vicinity of an IOCG deposit will display hydrothermal

alteration along a spectrum in which the dominant iron oxide is either

magnetite or hematite (Williams et al., 2005).

Contact zones between magnetite- and hematite-rich alteration are highly

favourable for the formation of higher grade copper-gold mineralisation

(Bastrokov et al., 2007).

GSQ Technical Workshop, June 2019

GSQ Technical Workshop, June 2019

Modified from Williams and Chopping 2009

Alteration Cone

Magnetite• Relatively dense and

magnetic

Hematite• Relatively dense but less

magnetic

Alteration Cone Theory • Chopping, 2007

• Williams and Chopping, 2009

• Chopping and van der

Wielen, 2009

GSQ Technical Workshop, June 2019

Gravity

Magnetic

SusceptibilityDensity

Magnetic Intensity

DATA

3D

IN

VE

RS

ION

MODEL

MAG3D v5.0

(Li & Oldenburg, 1996)

GRAV3D v5.0

(Li & Oldenburg, 1998)

Previous Work

Olympic Dam region, SA

• Williams et al., 2004

• Williams and Dipple, 2007

• Skirrow et al., 2007

• Hayward and Skirrow, 2010

Cobar region, NSW

• Chopping, 2008

• Chopping and van der Wielen, 2009

GSQ Technical Workshop, June 2019

e.g. Cobar region study

40 x 50 x 16 km

(Chopping and van der

Wielen, 2009)

GSQ Technical Workshop, June 2019

Tennant Creek

- Mount Isa

Project Area

GSQ Technical Workshop, June 2019

Core Volume• 830 km x 670 km x 70 km

Resolution• 2 km x 2 km cells horizontally

• Variable cell size vertically

Number of Cells• ~12.7 million

Method• UBCGIF 3D inversion

- MAG3D v5.0

- GRAV3D v5.0

• Coincident models

• NCI supercomputer

Scale and Resolution

Constraints

Crust

Upper Mantle

(AusMoho 2015)

Phanerozoic sediments

(SEEBASE 2006)

Proterozoic sediments

(SEEBASE 2005)

BathymetryPadding

Depth

70 km

Tennant Creek

Mount Isa

Gulf of

Carpentaria

GSQ Technical Workshop, June 2019

Curie Depth

(Chopping, in prep)

Tennant Creek

2.81 g/cm3 isosurface0.018 SI isosurface

DensityMagnetic Susceptibility

Mount Isa

Gulf of

Carpentaria

N

Coincident Inversion

0 0.030.01 0.02

Magnetic susceptibility (SI)

2.72 2.842.76 2.80

Density (g/cm3)

GSQ Technical Workshop, June 2019

Alteration Proxies

Magnetite Proxy

• High magnetic susceptibility

(> 0.015 SI)

• High density (> 2.81 g/cm3)

Hematite Proxy

• Low magnetic susceptibility

(< 0.01 SI)

• High density (> 2.82 g/cm3)M

agn

etic S

usce

ptib

ility

(S

I)

2.60 2.65 2.70 2.75 2.80 2.85 2.90 2.95

Density (g/cm3)

1e

-08

1e

-06

0.0

00

10

.01

GSQ Technical Workshop, June 2019

Unaltered

Host

Rock

Mount Isa

Tennant Creek

Gulf of

CarpentariaAlteration Proxies

Magnetite

alteration

(pink)

Hematite

alteration

(grey)

N

GSQ Technical Workshop, June 2019

GSQ Technical Workshop, June 2019

Magnetite Proxy

Hematite Proxy

Den > 2.81

Mag Sus > 0.015

Den > 2.82

Mag Sus < 0.01

Den > 2.82

Mag Sus > 0.02

Den > 2.83

Mag Sus < 0.01

Den > 2.84

Mag Sus < 0.01

Den > 2.83

Mag Sus > 0.025

Tennant Creek –Mount Isa Region

0 50 100 km

GSQ Technical Workshop, June 2019

0 50 10025 km

Ernest

Henry

Mount

Margaret

Monakoff

Eloise

Mount

CuthbertLady

Annie

Lady

Loretta

George

Fisher

Mount

Gordon

GSQ Technical Workshop, June 2019

East Tennant Region

0 50 100 kmTennant Creek –Mount Isa Region

GSQ Technical Workshop, June 2019

East Tennant Region0 50 km

Borehole

DDH005

East Tennant Model

• 800 m x 800 m cells

horizontally

© Commonwealth of Australia

(Geoscience Australia) 2019

Upper: biotite-qtz-fs-cordierite-sillimanite banded gneiss

Middle: graphite-Fe-Mg-Si-rich and Al-rich laminated metasediments

Lower: Metasomatized Carbonates with pyroxenes, pyrite and pyrrhotite

DDH005 Host Rocks

Slide courtesy of James Murr

GSQ Technical Workshop, June 2019

© Commonwealth of Australia

(Geoscience Australia) 2019

(0) Iron rich laminated mud/siltstones, probably of a sub-marine sedimentary facies

(1) Retrogression and/or hydrothermal alteration at upper greenschist/lower amphibolite facies, magnetite replacement of

protolithic hematite and veining with introduced magnetite/pyrite/amphibole/biotite.

(2) Brittle deformation, hydrothermal veining and alteration at low-medium temp (150°-250°C?) by chlorite/sericite-

hematite-pyrite-carbonate-chalcopyrite-titanite

(3) Late low temp (<150°C?) veins of hematite-dusted chalcedony & quartz and gypsum

DDH005 Middle 2018339549(1) Hematite altered magnetite with relict magnetite

Slide courtesy of James Murr

GSQ Technical Workshop, June 2019

DDH005 Paragenesis

© Commonwealth of Australia

(Geoscience Australia) 2019

(0) Iron rich laminated mud/siltstones, probably of a sub-marine sedimentary facies

(1) Retrogression and/or hydrothermal alteration at upper greenschist/lower amphibolite facies, magnetite replacement of

protolithic hematite and veining with introduced magnetite/pyrite/amphibole/biotite.

(2) Brittle deformation, hydrothermal veining and alteration at low-medium temp (150°-250°C?) by chlorite/sericite-

hematite-pyrite-carbonate-chalcopyrite-titanite

(3) Late low temp (<150°C?) veins of hematite-dusted chalcedony & quartz and gypsum

DDH005 Middle 2018339549(2) Chlorite/ser-hematite (probably remobilized)-pyrite-chalcopyrite vein (XPL)

Slide courtesy of James Murr

GSQ Technical Workshop, June 2019

DDH005 Paragenesis

GSQ Technical Workshop, June 2019

East Tennant Region0 50 km

Contact zones between

magnetite- and hematite-rich

alteration are highly favourable

for the formation of higher grade

copper-gold mineralisation.

(Bastrokov et al., 2007)

Limitations and Uncertainty

• Resolution of the models

• Prior geological knowledge (e.g. reference model constraints)

• Integration with other datasets is essential (deep seismic reflection,

AEM, solid geology, etc.)

• Overlap with unaltered geological units / other alteration minerals

• Remnant magnetisation

• Compare with the analytic signal

• Magnetic Vector Inversion (MVI; MacLeod and Ellis, 2013)

GSQ Technical Workshop, June 2019

Producing Magnetite and Hematite

Alteration Proxies using 3D Gravity

and Magnetic Inversion

Goodwin and Skirrow, 2019

GA Record 2019/003

dx.doi.org/10.11636/Record.2019.003

GSQ Technical Workshop, June 2019