machining a systems approach. ref: chen, joseph (2001). educational factory - from design to...
TRANSCRIPT
MachiningA systems approach
Ref: Chen, Joseph (2001). Educational Factory - From Design to Manufacturing Overview. Iowa State University
Manufacturing System
Manufacturing Cost
DFMA basic understanding of Design for
Manufacturability, DFM, makes you a more
effective manager (ITEC) and/or teacher
(TechEd) by understanding the interaction
of [a] machining operation(s) within the
context of material processing with respect
to COST, QUALITY, and PRODUCTIVITY!
3 mechanisms toward DFM
1. Design-manufacturing Teams
2. Common CAD systems for design &
tooling
3. Understanding the value concepts
Training Needs
Comparison of Industry and Academic Perspectives on the Training Needs of the
U.S. Manufacturing Workforce (Prziembel, 1995).
Value Engineering
THE VALUE OF A PRODUCT IS THE RATIO OF ITS PERFORMANCE TO ITS COST
Obtaining the maximum performance per unit cost is the basic objective of value engineering (Gage, 1967; Mudge, 1971)
Economic Perspective
The “Economic” Perspective on Value CreationFor any product, a “value equation” can be defined...
Non-reoccurring Cost allocation
Indirect labor costs
Direct labor costs
Direct material cost
Profit per unit - $$
PRICE orVALUE
Determined by Customer
Value Analysis
• Value analysis (VA) programs, as generally conducted today (Bradyhouse, 1984), first challenge the design of the product - searching for simpler designs that will reduce cost while maintaining function.
A simple example
2 parts 1 part
Screw – $ 0.02
Washer - $ 0.01
100 units = $ .03 * 100 = $ 3.00
5 seconds/screw = 5 * 100 = 500 seconds (8.33 min)
2 seconds/washer = 2 * 100 = 200 seconds (3.33 min)
(8.33 + 3.33)*($0.25) = $ 2.92
($ 3.00) + ($ 2.92) = $ 5.92
Screw – $ 0.02
100 units = $ .02 * 100 = $ 2.00
5 seconds/screw = 5 * 100 = 500 seconds (8.33 min)
(8.33)*($0.25)= $ 2.08
($ 2.00) + ($ 2.08) = $ 4.08
Material Cost
LaborCost
Material Cost
Material + Labor = Cost Material + Labor = Cost
LaborCost
Cost Comparison
$5.92$4.08 = .69 ~ 30% cost
reduction with new design
OLD2 part Design
NEW1 part Design
The other side
• Manufacturing Engineering– Concerned with assuring that parts can be
manufactured and assemblies made and tested to meet specifications with available or potentially available techniques, tooling, and test equipment at cost compatible with the product’s selling price (Howell, 1982).
– The emphasis in manufacturing engineering is to protect the interests of the manufacturing function
VA/Mfg. Engr. Relationship - Before
Product Development-Review
Traditional: Sequential Product Development
Aka: “Throw it over the wall”
MARKETING RESEARCH &DEVELOPMENT
ENGINEERING MANUFACTURING
Voice of the Customer/
Market OpportunitySatisfaction of Customer’s Needs
Concurrent Product Design
Satisfaction of Customer’s Needs
Design for Manufacturing (DFM)Needed
• Concept decisions, product design, and testing are performed prior to:– Manufacturing system design– Process planning and production
• TEAM approach is the KEY for success
2 Main streams of DFM
• Design for Machining (DFM)Design for Machining (DFM) is designing products with machining in mind.
• Design for Assembly (DFA)Design for Assembly (DFA) is designing products with minimum assembly cost in mind
Design For Machining
Goals of Design For Machining
1. Reduce machining time
2. Reduce material costs
3. Reduce tooling costs
4. Reduce setup cost
Eventually increase VALUEVALUE of a product
Examples of design concepts using Design For Machining
Limit Tooling
Bad Design – 2 different techniques required
Better Design – profiles similar
Radius Corners of Pockets
Extremely difficult, if not impossible to
machine
Better Design
Chucking Surface
Better Design:Area for clamping
Poor Design:No place for clamping
Restricted Surfaces
Better Design:Both areas now
accessible
Poor Design:No access
Single Plane Clamping Surfaces
Better Design:3 surfaces for
clamping
Poor Design:Awkward and time-
consuming for clamping
Design For Assembly
Texas Instrument Example
Design For Assembly
Comparison - DFA
Original
Design
Redesign
DFA
Improvement
(%)
Assembly Time (h) 2.15 .33 84.7
Num. of Different Parts 24 8 66.7
Total Num. of Parts 47 12 74.5
Total Num. of Operations 58 13 77.6
Metal Fabrication Time (h) 12.63 3.65 71.1
Total Weight (lb.) .48 .26 45.8
vs.
Comparison - DFA
TEAMWORK
Concurrent Product Design: Include ALL members
Team Makeup
• Basic understanding of teamwork in work force environment
• Decision making techniques, ie. Brainstorming, etc
• Project management skills
• Communication skills
• Problem resolution technique
Flowcharting
Gantt Charting
Communication Skills in Teams
1. Listening skills: hearing and comprehending what is said as opposed to waiting for one team member to stop talking
2. Dialoguing skills: interacting for the purpose of increasing mutual discussion
3. Consensus building: synergizing, building new understanding as opposed to compromise which is “both team members giving something up” to arrive at a solution
Characteristics of effective teams
• They produce results
• Purpose of the team is clear and takes priority over personal agendas
• Members feel invested in success and accountable for the outcome
• People are clear on their roles and assignments
• Nothing is under the table
• Team members are not afraid to surface a problem
• Trust, collaboration, and candid discussion are evident
• The team does not lose sight of its goal
Attributes of good team members
• They have strong, shared values• They overcome obstacles and handicaps• They incorporate and represent diverse
backgrounds• They are protective and supportive of one
another• There is a submission of self for the good of
the team
CAD Systems
Spatial Skills
REVIEW
Who casts the biggest shadow in terms of cost % in manufacturing?
Product Design
Explain how Design For Manufacturing is an integral part of the product design cycle?
Review
• How can we add value to a product?
Reduce: Machine Time, material costs, tooling costs, & setup costs
• Of the 3 communications skills, which do you feel you can work on to improve ? Why?
Listening, dialoguing, consensus