ma 252: data structures and algorithms · running time of insertion sort the running time depends...

26
MA 252: Data Structures and Algorithms Lecture 2 http://www.iitg.ernet.in/psm/indexing_ma252/y12/index.html Partha Sarathi Mandal Dept. of Mathematics, IIT Guwahati

Upload: others

Post on 08-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

MA 252: Data Structures and Algorithms Lecture 2

http://www.iitg.ernet.in/psm/indexing_ma252/y12/index.html

Partha Sarathi Mandal

Dept. of Mathematics, IIT Guwahati

The problem of sorting

Input: sequence ⟨a1, a2, …, an⟩ of numbers.

Output: permutation ⟨a'1, a'2, …, a'n⟩ such that a'1≤a'2≤…≤a'n.

Example:

Input: 8 2 4 9 3 6

Output: 2 3 4 6 8 9

P. S. Mandal, IITG

Sorting a hand of cards using insertion sort

P. S. Mandal, IITG

Insertion sort

Pseudo code

P. S. Mandal, IITG

Example of Insertion sort

P. S. Mandal, IITG

Example of Insertion sort

P. S. Mandal, IITG

Example of Insertion sort

P. S. Mandal, IITG

Example of Insertion sort

P. S. Mandal, IITG

Example of Insertion sort

P. S. Mandal, IITG

Example of Insertion sort

P. S. Mandal, IITG

Running Time

• The running time depends on the input: an already sorted sequence is easier to sort.

• Parameterize the running time by the size of the input, since short sequences are easier to sort than long ones.

• Generally, we seek upper bounds on the running time, because everybody likes a guarantee.

P. S. Mandal, IITG

Insertion Sort

P. S. Mandal, IITG

Running time of Insertion Sort

The Running time depends on the values of tj..

The tj vary according to the input instance.

P. S. Mandal, IITG

Best/Worst/Average Case

T(n) = (c1+c2+c4+c8)n + (c5+c6+c7) j=2j=n tj - (c2+c4+c6+c7+c8)

Best Case: when elements are already sorted then tj = 1, T(n) = f(n), linear time.

Worst Case: when elements are reversely sorted then tj = j, T(n) = f(n2), quadratic time

Average Case: when tj = j/2, T(n) = f(n2), quadratic time.

P. S. Mandal, IITG

Big-Oh Notation

• To simplify the running time estimation, for a function f(n), we ignore the constants and lower order terms.

Example: 10n3+4n2-4n+5 is O(n3).

P. S. Mandal, IITG

Big-Oh Notation (Formal Definition)

• Given functions f(n) and g(n), we say that f(n) is O(g(n)) if there are positive constants c and n0 such that

0 f(n) cg(n) for n n0

• Example: 2n + 10 is O(n)

– 2n + 10 cn

– (c 2) n 10

– n 10/(c 2)

– Pick c = 3 and n0 = 10

1

10

100

1,000

10,000

1 10 100 1,000

n

3n

2n+10

n

P. S. Mandal, IITG

Big-Oh Example

• Example: the function n2 is not O(n)

– n2 cn

– n c

– The above inequality cannot be satisfied since c must be a constant

– n2 is O(n2).

1

10

100

1,000

10,000

100,000

1,000,000

1 10 100 1,000

n

n^2

100n

10n

n

P. S. Mandal, IITG

More Big-Oh Examples

• 7n-2 7n-2 is O(n)

need c > 0 and n0 1 such that 7n-2 c•n for n n0

this is true for c = 7 and n0 = 1

• 3n3 + 20n2 + 5 3n3 + 20n2 + 5 is O(n3)

need c > 0 and n0 1 such that 3n3 + 20n2 + 5 cn3 for n n0

this is true for c = 4 and n0 = 21

• 3 log n + 5 3 log n + 5 is O(log n)

need c > 0 and n0 1 such that 3 log n + 5 c log n for n n0

this is true for c = 8 and n0 = 2

P. S. Mandal, IITG

Big-Oh and Growth Rate

• The big-Oh notation gives an upper bound on the growth rate of a function

• The statement “f(n) is O(g(n))” means that the growth rate of f(n) is no more than the growth rate of g(n)

• We can use the big-Oh notation to rank functions according to their growth rate

P. S. Mandal, IITG

Big-Oh Rules

• If f(n) is a polynomial of degree d, then f(n) is O(nd), i.e., – Drop lower-order terms

– Drop constant factors

• Use the smallest possible class of functions

– Say “2n is O(n)” instead of “2n is O(n2)”

• Use the simplest expression of the class

– Say “3n + 5 is O(n)” instead of “3n + 5 is O(3n)”

P. S. Mandal, IITG

Growth Rate of Running Time

• Consider a program with time complexity O(n2). – for the input of size n, it takes 5 seconds. – If the input size is doubled (2n). – then it takes 20 seconds.

• Consider a program with time complexity O(n).

– for the input of size n, it takes 5 seconds. – If the input size is doubled (2n). – then it takes 10 seconds.

• Consider a program with time complexity O(n3).

– for the input of size n, it takes 5 seconds. – If the input size is doubled (2n) . – then it takes 40 seconds.

P. S. Mandal, IITG

Asymptotic Algorithm Analysis

• The asymptotic analysis of an algorithm determines the running time in big-Oh notation

• To perform the asymptotic analysis – We find the worst-case number of primitive operations executed as

a function of the input size

– We express this function with big-Oh notation

• Example: – We determine that algorithm arrayMax executes at most 6n 1

primitive operations

– We say that algorithm arrayMax “runs in O(n) time”

• Since constant factors and lower-order terms are eventually dropped anyhow, we can disregard them when counting primitive operations.

P. S. Mandal, IITG

Computing Prefix Averages

• We further illustrate asymptotic analysis with two algorithms for prefix averages

• The i-th prefix average of an array X is average of the first (i + 1) elements of X:

A[i] = (X[0] + X[1] + … + X[i])/(i+1)

• Computing the array A of prefix averages of another array X has applications to financial analysis

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

X

A

P. S. Mandal, IITG

Prefix Averages (Quadratic)

• The following algorithm computes prefix averages in quadratic time by applying the definition.

Algorithm prefixAverages1(X, n) Input array X of n integers

Output array A of prefix averages of X #operations A new array of n integers n for i 0 to n 1 do n { s X[0] n for j 1 to i do 1 + 2 + …+ (n 1) s s + X[j] 1 + 2 + …+ (n 1) A[i] s / (i + 1) } n return A 1

P. S. Mandal, IITG

Arithmetic Progression

• The running time of prefixAverages1 is O(1 + 2 + …+ n)

• The sum of the first n integers is n(n + 1) / 2

– There is a simple visual proof of this fact

• Thus, algorithm prefixAverages1 runs in T(n)=O(n2) time

P. S. Mandal, IITG

Prefix Averages (Linear)

• The following algorithm computes prefix averages in linear time by keeping a running sum.

• Algorithm prefixAverages2 runs in T(n)=O(n)

time

Algorithm prefixAverages2(X, n) Input array X of n integers

Output array A of prefix averages of X #operations A new array of n integers n s 0 1 for i 0 to n 1 do n {s s + X[i] n A[i] s / (i + 1) } n return A 1

P. S. Mandal, IITG