m e g search at psi: su gra indications
DESCRIPTION
SUSY SU(5) predictions BR ( m e g ) 10 -14 10 -13 SUSY S O ( 10 ) predictions BR SO(10) 100 BR SU(5). Experimental limit. Our goal. m e g search at PSI: SU GRA indications. LFV induced by slepton mixing. R. Barbieri et al., Phys. Lett. B 338 (199 4 ) 21 2 - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
MEG
1
e search at PSI: SUGRA indications
• SUSY SU(5) predictions
BR (e) 10-14 10-
13
• SUSY SO(10) predictions
BRSO(10) 100 BRSU(5) R. Barbieri et al., Phys. Lett. B338(1994) 212
R. Barbieri et al., Nucl. Phys. B445(1995) 215
LFV induced by slepton mixing
Our goal
Experimental limit
combined LEP results favour tan>10 -5410R in the Standard Model !!
MEG
2
Experimental method
1m
e+
Liq. Xe Scin tilla tionDetector
Drift Cham ber
Liq. Xe Scin tilla tionDetector
e+
Tim ing Counter
Stopping TargetThin S uperconducting Coil
M uon Beam
Drift Cham ber
Easy signal selection with + at rest
e+ + Ee = E = 52.8 MeV
e = 180°Detector outline
• Stopped beam of 3 107 /sec in a 150 m target
• Liquid Xenon calorimeter for detection (scintillation)
- fast: 4 / 22 / 45 ns
- high LY: ~ 0.8 * NaI
- short X0: 2.77 cm
• Solenoid spectrometer & drift chambers for e+ momentum
• Scintillation counters for e+ timing
MEG
3
INFN & Pisa University A. Baldini, C. Bemporad, F.Cei, M.Grassi, F. Morsani, D. Nicolo’, A. Papa, R. Pazzi, F. Raffaelli, F. Sergiampietri, G. Signorelli
ICEPP, University of Tokyo Y. Hisamatsu, T. Iwamoto, T. Mashimo, S. Mihara, T. Mori, H. Natori, H. Nishiguchi, W. Ootani, K. Ozone, R. Sawada, Y. Uchiyama, S. Yamada, S. Yamashita
KEK, Tsukuba T. Haruyama, A. Maki, Y. Makida, A. Yamamoto, K. Yoshimura
Waseda University T. Doke, J. Kikuchi, H. Okada, S. Suzuki, K. Terasawa, M. Yamaguchi
Budker Institute, Novosibirsk L.M. Barkov, A.A. Grebenuk, D.G. Grigoriev, B, Khazin, N.M. Ryskulov
PSI, Villigen J. Egger, P. Kettle, M. Hildebrandt, S. Ritt, M. Schneebeli
INFN & Pavia University A.de Bari, P. Cattaneo, G. Cecchet, G. Nardo’, M. Rossella
INFN & Genova University S. Dussoni, F. Gatti, P. Ottonello, D. Pergolesi, R. Valle
INFN Roma I D. Zanello
INFN & Lecce University S. Spagnolo, C. Chiri, P. Creti, C. Gatto,G. Marsella, G. Palama’, M. Panareo, G. Tassielli
The MEG collaboration
MEG
4
Detector Construction
SwitzerlandSwitzerlandDrift ChambersBeam LineDAQ
JapanJapanLXe Calorimeter, Spectrometer’s magnet
RussiaRussiaLXe TestsPurification
ItalyItalye+ counter (Pv+Ge)Trigger (Pisa)LXe Calorimeter(Pisa)Splitters (Lecce)
MEG
5
COnstant Bending RAdius (COBRA) spectrometer
Gradient field Uniform field
• Constant bending radius independent of emission angles
• High pT positrons quickly swept out
Gradient field Uniform field
• Bc = 1.26T current = 359A• Five coils with three different diameters • Compensation coils to suppress the stray field around the
LXe detector• High-strength aluminum stabilized superconductor
thin magnet (1.46 cm Aluminum, 0.2 X0)
Ready: at PSI !!
MEG
6
Positron Tracker (PSI)
• 17 chamber sectors aligned radially with 10°intervals
• Two staggered arrays of drift cells• Chamber gas: He-C2H6 mixture• Vernier pattern to measure z-
position made of 15 m kapton foils
(X,Y) ~200 m (drift time) (Z) ~ 300 m (charge divisionvernier strips)
goalsOK To be proved in
mag.field
MEG
7
Positron Timing Counter (Pavia + Genova + Roma )
• One (outer) layer of scintillator read by PMTs : timing•One inner layer of scintillating fibers read by APDs: trigger (the long. Position
is needed for a fast estimate of the positron direction)•Goal time~ 40 psec (100 ps FWHM) reached in tests
BC404
5 x 5 mm2
MEG
8
• 800 l of Liquid Xe
• ~800 PMT immersed in LXe
• Only scintillation light
• High luminosity
• Unsegmented volume
Liquid Xe calorimeter (Pisa + Tokyo + KEK)
FWHM =FWHM =4.8 ± 0.3%4.8 ± 0.3%
55 MeV
R<1.5cm
40 MeV and 1 mm collimator
•Measured position and energy resolutions with a 100 liters prototype
• Cryostat in construction
• 150 ps FWHM timing resolution proved
MEG
9
Trigger Electronics (Pisa)
Beam rate 108
s-1
Fast LXe energy sum > 45MeV2103 s-1
g interaction point (PMT of max charge)
e+ hit point in timing counter
time correlation – e+ 200 s-1
angular correlation – e+ 20 s-1
•Uses easily quantities:
energy
•Positron- coincidence in time and direction
•Built on a FADC-FPGA architecture
•More complex algorithms implementable
1 board
2 VME 6U
1 VME 9U
Type2
Type2
LXe inner face
(312 PMT)
. .
. 20 boards
20 x 48
Type1Type1Type1
16
3
Type2
2 boards
. . .
10 boards
10 x 48
Type1Type1Type1
16
3
LXe lateral faces
(488 PMT: 4 to 1 fan-in)
Type2
1 board
. . .
12 boards
12 x 48
Type1Type1
Type1
16
3
Timing counters
(160 PMT) Type2Type2
2 boards2 x 48
4 x 48
2 x 48
Prototype board
tested at PSI
MEG
10
Readout electronics (PSI): Domino Ring Sampler (DRS chip)
• Analog Waveform digitizing for all channels
• Custom domino sampling chip designed at PSI• 2.5 GHz sampling speed @ 40 ps timing
resolution
• Sampling depth 1024 bins
• Readout similar to trigger
•Spike structure will be simply fixed by re-programming FPGA on the board.
2.5 GHz
Set of 1024 capacitors40 MHz 11 bit
Prototype tested with 55 MeV photons in the 100 l prototype
raw After calibrations
MEG
11
Sensitivity Summary
0.6ε 0.70.9ε 0.9ε γ3
sele
0.09 4π Ω
sμ100.3R s102.6T 8
μ7
Cuts at 1,4FWHM
Detector parameters
seleμsig
4
RTBRNSignal
seleμ
4RT
1SES 410-
14
Single Event Sensitivity
corrBReγ
2eγ
2γeμacc ΔΔΔΔ tθEERBR 210-
14
310-
15
Backgrounds
Upper Limit at 90% CL BR (e) 110-13
MEG
12
http://meg.psi.chhttp://meg.pi.infn.it
http://meg.icepp.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
http://meg.psi.chhttp://meg.pi.infn.it
http://meg.icepp.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Sensitivity and time schedule
• Total measurement time: 2 years (50% duty cycle of PSI beam)
• One e event observed if BR = 4 x 10-14
• If no event observed upper BR limit at 90% CL = 10-13
Discovery: 4 events (P = 210-3) correspond to BR = 210-
13
• Final prototypes being tested• Full scale Drift Chamber
• Time profile
More details at
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Planning R & D Assembly Data Taking
nownowLoILoI ProposalProposalRevisedReviseddocumentdocument
<LHC