low salinity water flooding experimental experience and challenges force workshop ingebret fjelde

23
Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges Force workshop Ingebret Fjelde

Upload: ralph-campbell

Post on 29-Dec-2015

228 views

Category:

Documents


8 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges Force workshop Ingebret Fjelde

Low salinity water floodingExperimental experience and

challenges

Force workshopIngebret Fjelde

Page 2: Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges Force workshop Ingebret Fjelde

Low salinity Force 15 May 2008 IF 2

Outline

• Questions

• Experiences

• Challenges

• Concluding remarks

Page 3: Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges Force workshop Ingebret Fjelde

Low salinity Force 15 May 2008 IF 3

Questions

• Are the mechanisms in low salinity water flooding understood?

• Can low salinity water flooding be used in all sandstone fields?

– If not, when can it be used?

• Will low salinity water flooding improve the oil recovery in all sandstone reservoirs?

• Can oil recovery be estimated by existing reservoir simulators?

Page 4: Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges Force workshop Ingebret Fjelde

Low salinity Force 15 May 2008 IF 4

Low salinity water flooding can not be understood by classic EOR

• No miscible process• No reduction in IFT• Mobility control?

– Favorable mobility control if M<1• Reducing krw or o

• Increasing kro or w

– Non of these seems to be dominating

• When all other explanations have failed put the blame on wettability

)()(ro

o

w

rw

d

D

k

kM

Page 5: Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges Force workshop Ingebret Fjelde

Low salinity Force 15 May 2008 IF 5

Literature

• Reported to improve oil recovery in sandstones

– Core experiments and reservoirs

• Reported to depend on, e.g.

– Multicomponent ion exchange important

– Clay content (sometimes fines produced)

– Composition formation water (Ca2+, Mg2+)

– Oil composition (crude oil, no effect with white oils)

– Initial water saturation required

– pH increase (≈ alkaline flood, but no correlation with AN)

Page 6: Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges Force workshop Ingebret Fjelde

Low salinity Force 15 May 2008 IF 6

Tulsa SPEIOR 2008

• SPE 113480, Endicott field

– Improved oil recovery shown in core floods and single well tracer test

– Kaoline content important

• SPE 113976

– Mechanisms

• Multiple-component ionic exchange (MIE) between adsorbed crude oil components, cations in the in situ brine and clay mineral surfaces

– Single well tracer test Alaskian reservoir

• High salinity water and produced water Sor=0.300.02

• Non optimised low salinity brine Sor=0.280.02

• Optimised low salinity brine Sor=0.200.02

– Composition of optimised brine not given

Page 7: Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges Force workshop Ingebret Fjelde

Low salinity Force 15 May 2008 IF 7

Irreversible?

• SCA2006-36

– Re-aged cores higher oil recovery at high salinity, but no oil production in tertiary low salinity water flooding

• Not likely due to multiple-component ionic exchange

Page 8: Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges Force workshop Ingebret Fjelde

Low salinity Force 15 May 2008 IF 8

Spontaneous imbibition limestoneFormation water vs low salinity water

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

0.50

0 5 10 15 20 25

Time [days]

Oil

rec

ov

ery Formation water 1

Formation water 2

Low salinity 1

Low salinity 2

Low salinity water can also increase oil recovery in limestone

Probably not only clastic clays that are important for low salinity water flooding of sandstone

Page 9: Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges Force workshop Ingebret Fjelde

Low salinity Force 15 May 2008 IF 9

Adsorption surface active components onto surfaces

• Adsorption

– Surface charge

• pH, salinity and brine composition

– Adsorption density depends on salinity and brine composition

• Desorption

– Depend on the same parameters as adsorption

– By decreasing salinity adsorption density decreases

– Change of brine composition can also change surface charge

• Electrical double-layer expands with decreasing brine salinity

Page 10: Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges Force workshop Ingebret Fjelde

Low salinity Force 15 May 2008 IF 10

Adsorption of acidic crude oil components onto chalkAcid number in effluent during injection of crude oil to chalk

0,0

0,5

1,0

1,5

2,0

2,5

0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0

PV

AN

[mg

KO

H/ g

]

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Oil

volu

me

[ml]

AN

AN injected crude oil

Oil production

Page 11: Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges Force workshop Ingebret Fjelde

Low salinity Force 15 May 2008 IF 11

Surfactant adsorption Decreases with decreasing salinity

Somasundaran, P. and Hanna, H.S., ”Physico-chemical aspects of adsorption at solid/liquid interfaces,”in Improved Oil Recovery by Surfactant and Polymer flooding, ed. D.O. Shah and R.S. Schechter, Academic Press, New York, 1977, pp. 2005-74

• Adsorption equilibrium

• Usually reversible

• Reduction of salinity will give desorption

• Similar expected for surface active components in crude oils

• Asphaltenes may be an exception

Page 12: Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges Force workshop Ingebret Fjelde

Low salinity Force 15 May 2008 IF 12

Drilling fluids

• Water in drilling fluids can give swelling of clay and shale and reduction of permeability

• Solved by using inhibitive drilling fluids

– Water based drilling fluid with high salinity

– Emulsified mud with high salt concentrations

-50-30-101030507090

110130150

Base oil Brine 1 Brine 2 Oil based mudfiltrate

Vol

ume

chan

ge [

%]

Kaolinite Na-Montmorillonite

Swelling clay: Bulk study

Low salinity water flood may not be carried out in all oil reservoirs

Page 13: Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges Force workshop Ingebret Fjelde

Low salinity Force 15 May 2008 IF 13

MechanismsAlteration of flow saturation functions

• Description of mechanisms required

Page 14: Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges Force workshop Ingebret Fjelde

Low salinity Force 15 May 2008 IF 14

Challenge Time effects

• Analyses of effluents necessary to confirm that adsorption equilibrium has been established

– Preparation of initial state at high salinity

– Preparation of final state at low salinity

– Studies of mechanisms

• Time effects can be important in the laboratory, but not in the fields

– But laboratory results will be used as inputs to simulators for estimations of oil recovery potential

Page 15: Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges Force workshop Ingebret Fjelde

Low salinity Force 15 May 2008 IF 15

Time effects 1

I.Fjelde, T. Austad and J. Milter, ”Adsorption VII. Dynamic adsorption of a dual surfactant system onto reservoir cores at sea water salinity,” J. Petr. Science & Eng., 13 (1995), 1993-201.

• Adsorption can be slow

• Oil components

• Aging of core plugs

• Chemicals

• Surfactants

• Polymers

Page 16: Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges Force workshop Ingebret Fjelde

Low salinity Force 15 May 2008 IF 16

Time effects 2Desorption surface active components can be slow

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

0 2 4 6 8

Light STO injected [PV]

IFT

[m

N/m

]

MFM

MFS

• Interfacial tensions (IFT) between effluent samples and formation water during back-production of mud filtrate with crude oil– Fjelde, I., “Slow retention and release processes during drilling with

emulsified drilling fluids,” 18th International Oil Field Chemicals Symposium, Geilo, Norway, 25-28 March 2007.

Mud filtrates

IFT (crude oil – brine) ≈ 30 mN/m

Page 17: Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges Force workshop Ingebret Fjelde

Low salinity Force 15 May 2008 IF 17

Challenge Crude oils

• Complex mixtures of surface active oil components

– Many types of surface active components

– Different crude oils different types and concentrations

– Interactions between crude oil components

• Interaction between resins and asphaltenes important for asphaltene solubility / dispersion

• Simplified systems may not give good enough description

• Concentrations of surface active oil components and their solvency different in stock tank oil and live oil

• Some oil components soluble in water

Page 18: Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges Force workshop Ingebret Fjelde

Low salinity Force 15 May 2008 IF 18

Challenge Crude oils cont.

• Mixing of crude oils with low aromatic synthetic oil

– Will reduce concentrations of surface active oil components

– Can reduce solvency of some of the surface active components, e.g. will increase aggregation of asphaltene molecules in oil phase and on surfaces

Page 19: Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges Force workshop Ingebret Fjelde

Low salinity Force 15 May 2008 IF 19

Challenge Crude oils / Oxidation

• Oxidation of crude oil will increase concentrations of acidic components

– Oxidation products can have other properties than original polar components

• Oxidation products can be less soluble, e.g. oxidation asphaltenes

– Important to compare concentration of surface active components in used crude oil vs in original reservoir oil

• Isolation of polar components from crude oil especially critical

– After short term storage, often difficult to dissolve all of the polar components because of oxidation

Page 20: Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges Force workshop Ingebret Fjelde

Low salinity Force 15 May 2008 IF 20

Challenge Correct sampling in laboratory• Proposed mechanisms are known to depend on

– Conditions

• Temperature, pressure and pH

– Different properties can be affected, e.g.

• Solubility (ions and oil components)

• Interactions (ions, oil components and rock surfaces)

• Sampling should be carried out at test conditions

– Alternative, have to verify that sampling can be carried out at other conditions, e.g. room temperature and 1 atm

Page 21: Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges Force workshop Ingebret Fjelde

Low salinity Force 15 May 2008 IF 21

Challenge Reservoir conditions

• Reservoir conditions

– High temperature and high pressure

• Characterisation of mechanisms can be difficult at reservoir conditions, e.g.

– Interactions between surfaces and oil components and ions

• Zeta potential

• Contact angles

Page 22: Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges Force workshop Ingebret Fjelde

Low salinity Force 15 May 2008 IF 22

Challenge Potential estimates

Parametic study

Identify mechanisms

Modelling experiments

Simple but good enough description

Extension larger scale

Behaviour larger scale

Preliminary studies insimplified fluid and rocksystems, but final validationat reservoir conditions

Potential estimate

Optimisation reservoir process,

e.g. inj. strategy

Page 23: Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges Force workshop Ingebret Fjelde

Low salinity Force 15 May 2008 IF 23

Concluding remarks

• Low salinity water flooding an environmentally friendly EOR method

• Open the route for alkaline flooding and alkaline/surfactant flooding

• Need best practice for low salinity water flooding potential evaluation

• Description of mechanisms and determination of recovery potential should be confirmed using reservoir fluids and reservoir rocks at reservoir conditions