low intensity pulsed ultrasound (lipus) accelerates systemic recruitment … · 2020. 9. 23. ·...

1
Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound (LIPUS) Accelerates Systemic Recruitment of Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) for Fracture Healing 1 Chin, W C; 1,2 Leung, K S; 1 Li, G; 1 Qin, L, + 1 Cheung, W H + 1 The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, 2 Institute of Biomedical and Health Engineering, Shenzhen, China email: [email protected] ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: Fracture healing is a biological regenerative process that follows a well-orchestrated sequence. It starts with an inflammation phase followed by the formation of a callus filled by granulation tissue. The callus is then invaded by mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and blood vessels. Therefore, the recruitment of multi-potent MSCs to differentiate into sufficient osteogenic cells in early stage of fracture repair is crucial for a successful fracture healing. With recent research showing the efficacy of low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) on increasing cellular activities as well as enhancing blood flow 1 , we hypothesized that LIPUS could enhance the systemic recruitment of MSCs for fracture healing. The objectives of this study were to investigate the effect of LIPUS on intracardially administered MSCs homing to fracture site and to evaluate its efficacy to accelerate fracture healing. METHODS: In this study, sixty 3-month-old rats were used to create closed fracture at femur shaft, according to our established protocol 2 . The fractured rats were divided into 3 groups: (i) intracardiac injection of GFP-labelled MSCs (GFP-MSCs) plus LIPUS group (MSC-LIPUS), (ii) intracardiac injection of GFP-labelled MSCs group (MSC), and (iii) no-treatment control group (CTL). For the MSC-LIPUS and MSC groups, 4 million GFP-MSCs (in 0.5 mL by volume) was delivered intracardially on day 3 post-fracture. The rats in MSC-LIPUS group were further given daily LIPUS treatment following the cell injection since day 3 post-fracture. Euthanasia time points were at 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks after fracture. To monitor the MSCs homing to fracture sites, end-point GFP fluorescence measurement on the rat femur ex vivo with imaging system (IVIS 200, Xenogen, USA) and immunochemistry were used. Weekly radiology, micro-computed tomography and histomorphometry were assessed on monitoring the fracture healing progress. RESULTS SECTION: GFP fluorescence measurement (at harvest) showed both the MSC- LIPUS and MSC groups were with higher values than that of the CTL group at all the time points, despite no significant difference. Table 1: The end-point GFP fluorescence measurement (in counts x10 5 ) Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 MSC-LIPUS 2.6±0.73 2.6±0.12 2.8±0.33 2.8±1.0 MSC 2.8±0.61 2.6±0.64 3.0±0.16 2.5±0.48 CTL 1.8±0.39 1.7±0.41 1.9±0.57 2.0±0.84 Immunohistochemistry result showed the amount of injected GFP-MSCs present at the fracture site, an indication on the possible homing effect (Figure 1). The MSC-LIPUS group was shown to have the highest signal at all the time points among the groups. And within the MSC-LIPUS, the GFP-MSCs signal was the highest at Week 2. Figure 1: HRP-staining of the immunohistochemistry (200X) Weekly Radiology was assessed through the callus width measurement (Figure 2). Significant differences (p<0.05) were observed between the MSC-LIPUS and CTL groups (*), the MSC-LIPUS and MSC groups (+), the MSC and CTL groups (o). Histomorphometry on H&E staining (Figure 3) showed the progress of the fracture healing from the mid-sagittal section of the fractured femur (16X). The MSC-LIPUPS group was shown with the fastest bridging of the woven bone while the CTL group was shown with the slowest. Micro-computed tomography (Micro-CT) included both the qualitative and quantitative analyses. For the qualitative assessment (Figure 4), the MSC-LIPUS was shown with the fastest bridging rate while the CTL group was shown with the slowest. Quantitatively, despite the observed significant differences (p<0.05) (Figure 5), the percentage change on the BV/TV from Week 1 to Week 2 of the MSC-LIPUS, MSC and CTL groups were 11.3%, 8.71% and 1.39% respectively. Figure 2: Radiology (callus width) Figure 3: Histomorphometry (16X) Figure 4: micro-CT (Qualitative) Figure 5: micro-CT (Quantitative) DISCUSSION: This is the first study to show LIPUS could enhance MSCs homing. Moreover, the enhanced fracture healing process under LIPUS was as well demonstrated. Through the GFP fluorescence measurement and immunohistochemistry assessment, the positive relationship between the application of LIPUS and the accelerated homing effect of the injected MSCs to the fracture site was illustrated. From the radiology, microCT and histomorphometry assessments, the MSC-LIPUS group was shown with the fastest woven bone bridging rate; the much enhanced endochondral ossification during the fracture healing process. The use of LIPUS was shown with an enhancing effect on fracture healing. As previous study showed LIPUS stimulates the synthesis of chemoattractant for MSCs homing 3 , further study on the CXCR4/SDF-1 pathway could elucidate the possible mechanism by which the MSCs are mobilized and recruited under influence of LIPUS. SIGNIFICANCE: This study shows the use of LIPUS on enhancing fracture healing, as well as providing an insight on the mechanism of MSCs homing under LIPUS; a possible alternative approach for non-union which the cellular activities are low and local MSCs have been depleted. ACKNOWLEDGMENT: This study was supported by OTC grant (Ref. No. 2009-WHLG) REFERENCES: 1. Cui JH, et al. Tissue Eng. 12(1):75-82, 2006. 2. Leung KS, Cheung WH, Qin L. J Orthop Res. 2008. 3. Lapidot T, et al. Exp Hematol. 30(9):973-81, 2002 Paper No. 0058 ORS 2012 Annual Meeting

Upload: others

Post on 16-Feb-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound (LIPUS) Accelerates Systemic Recruitment of Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) for Fracture Healing

    1Chin, W C; 1,2Leung, K S; 1Li, G; 1Qin, L, +1Cheung, W H

    +1The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, 2Institute of Biomedical and Health Engineering, Shenzhen, China email: [email protected]

    ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION:

    Fracture healing is a biological regenerative process that follows a well-orchestrated sequence. It starts with an inflammation phase followed by the formation of a callus filled by granulation tissue. The callus is then invaded by mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and blood vessels. Therefore, the recruitment of multi-potent MSCs to differentiate into sufficient osteogenic cells in early stage of fracture repair is crucial for a successful fracture healing. With recent research showing the efficacy of low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) on increasing cellular activities as well as enhancing blood flow1, we hypothesized that LIPUS could enhance the systemic recruitment of MSCs for fracture healing. The objectives of this study were to investigate the effect of LIPUS on intracardially administered MSCs homing to fracture site and to evaluate its efficacy to accelerate fracture healing. METHODS: In this study, sixty 3-month-old rats were used to create closed fracture at femur shaft, according to our established protocol2. The fractured rats were divided into 3 groups: (i) intracardiac injection of GFP-labelled MSCs (GFP-MSCs) plus LIPUS group (MSC-LIPUS), (ii) intracardiac injection of GFP-labelled MSCs group (MSC), and (iii) no-treatment control group (CTL). For the MSC-LIPUS and MSC groups, 4 million GFP-MSCs (in 0.5 mL by volume) was delivered intracardially on day 3 post-fracture. The rats in MSC-LIPUS group were further given daily LIPUS treatment following the cell injection since day 3 post-fracture. Euthanasia time points were at 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks after fracture. To monitor the MSCs homing to fracture sites, end-point GFP fluorescence measurement on the rat femur ex vivo with imaging system (IVIS 200, Xenogen, USA) and immunochemistry were used. Weekly radiology, micro-computed tomography and histomorphometry were assessed on monitoring the fracture healing progress. RESULTS SECTION: GFP fluorescence measurement (at harvest) showed both the MSC-LIPUS and MSC groups were with higher values than that of the CTL group at all the time points, despite no significant difference. Table 1: The end-point GFP fluorescence measurement (in counts x105)

    Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 MSC-LIPUS 2.6±0.73 2.6±0.12 2.8±0.33 2.8±1.0

    MSC 2.8±0.61 2.6±0.64 3.0±0.16 2.5±0.48 CTL 1.8±0.39 1.7±0.41 1.9±0.57 2.0±0.84

    Immunohistochemistry result showed the amount of injected GFP-MSCs present at the fracture site, an indication on the possible homing effect (Figure 1). The MSC-LIPUS group was shown to have the highest signal at all the time points among the groups. And within the MSC-LIPUS, the GFP-MSCs signal was the highest at Week 2.

    Figure 1: HRP-staining of the immunohistochemistry (200X)

    Weekly Radiology was assessed through the callus width measurement (Figure 2). Significant differences (p /JPEG2000ColorImageDict > /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 300 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict > /GrayImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayImageDict > /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict > /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile () /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False

    /CreateJDFFile false /Description > /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ > /FormElements false /GenerateStructure false /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles false /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /LeaveUntagged /UntaggedRGBHandling /UseDocumentProfile /UseDocumentBleed false >> ]>> setdistillerparams> setpagedevice