logistics systems engineering maintainability/serviceability/human factors
DESCRIPTION
SMU SYS 7340. NTU SY-521-N. Logistics Systems Engineering Maintainability/Serviceability/Human Factors. Dr. Jerrell T. Stracener, SAE Fellow. Maintainability Maintainability is - an engineering and management function spanning the product or service life cycle - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Logistics Systems EngineeringMaintainability/Serviceability/Human Factors
NTUSY-521-N
SMUSYS 7340
Dr. Jerrell T. Stracener, SAE Fellow
2
Maintainability
• Maintainability is- an engineering and management function
spanning the product or service life cycle
- a characteristic of equipment design andinstallation which is expressed in terms of ease and economy of maintenance, availability of the equipment, safety and accuracy in the performance of maintenance actions.
3
Maintainability
• Objective of maintainability- to design and develop systems and
equipment which can be maintained in the least time, at the least cost, and with a minimum expenditure of support resources, without adversely affecting the item performance or safety characteristics
4
Product/Service Support Resources
• logistics personnel utilization
• spare parts
• tools and test equipment
• support services
• support facilities
5
What is Maintainability?
Converters for driving factory belts1. Motor Burn-out2. Wire replacements3. Torque Adjustments4. Lubrication
– What are its associated cost?Down time: StaffingProduction: Product to marketHuman factors: Stress, Leaning CurveReliability: Service performance and
guarantees
6
What is Maintainability?
• Maintainability greatly influences reliability and availability of a system or subsystem.
• Maintainability must be addressed early in the design stage to prevent or reduce failure or down times of the system.
7
Why is Maintainability Required?1
• Infinite Reliability is not achievable• When a system is discarded, it must be
discarded or it must be repaired• Cost usually dictates that a faulty system must
be repaired• In addition to repair, most systems must be
serviced (Consumables replaced - fuel, oil, coolant, etc.)
• Incipient failures must be detected
8
• To verify that equipment has not deteriorated, its overall capability to perform must be reviewed
• Maintenance is the repair, servicing, and inspection of equipment
Why is Maintainability Required?1
9
Maintenance Concept
• Maintenance defines all those activities performed on an item to retain it in or to restore it to s specified state.4
• Can be divided into two categories:1. Preventive Maintenance
Prescribe procedures to reduce the probability of failure or degradation
2. Corrective MaintenanceInitiated after fault recognitionRegain state of system for
performing required function
10
Maintenance Concept
11
Detection
Preparation forMaintenance
Location andIsolation
Disassembly(Access)
Removal ofFault Item
Re-assembly
Alignmentand Adjustment
ConditionVerification
or
Repair ofEquipment
Installation ofSpare/Repair Part
Failure Occurs
Failure Confirmed
Active Maintenance Commences
Faulty Item Identified
Disassembly Complete
Re-assembly Complete
Repair Completed
Maintenance Concept
Corr
ecti
ve M
ain
ten
an
ce C
ycle
6
12
Maintenance is Conducted:7
• On equipment repair– Remove and replace faulty item– Adjust of align an item that has drifted out of
specification• Off equipment repair
– In a local shop– In and industrial facility
13
Achieving Maintainability
• Achieving maintainability is done through planning and realizing maintenance concepts:– Fault Detection and isolation– Partitioning equipment or systems into LRUs– User documentation– Training– Logistical Support
14
• Fault Detection and isolation– Goal is to localize faults down to LRU’s (last
repairable unit / line replacement unit) by performing the following:BIT (Built-in test):1. Degree of fault2. Degree of isolation3. Correctness of the fault isolation4. Test duration
Achieving Maintainability
15
BITE (Built-in test equipment):1. Simplicity2. Standardization3. Reliability4. Maintenance
• Equipment and System Partitioning– Partition complex equipment and systems
into LRUs: PCB– Accessibility: Ease of LRU– Adjustment: Digital reduces need– Exchange: Careful of obsolescence
Achieving Maintainability
16
• User Documentation– General Description– Operating Manual– Preventive Maintenance– Corrective Maintenance– Illustrated Spare Parts Catalog– Logistical Support
• Training of Operating & Maintenance Personnel– Well trained and motivated– Human Errors
Achieving Maintainability
17
• User Logistical Support– Four Levels
1. Operating personnel2. First line maintenance personnel3. Maintenance personnel4. Specialist from arsenal or industry
Achieving Maintainability
18
• Specify– Specifications, Contracts, Warranties– Program Plan
• Design– Equipment Arrangement– Equipment Location– Servicing Locations– Weapon Location– Turnaround Arena– Accessibility– Fault and Servicing Cues
Achieving Maintainability
19
• Plan– Predesign Homework– By Analysis– Mock Ups
• Demonstrate Supportability– Verify Operation Environment
Achieving Maintainability
20
Achieving Maintainability
21
Bottoms Up Models
• Provide output to monitor design progress vs. requirements
• Provide input data for life cycle cost• Provide trade-off capability
– Design features vs. maintainability requirements
– Performance vs. maintainability requirements• Provide Justification for maintenance
improvements perceived as the design progresses
22
Bottoms Up Models
• Provide the basis for maintainability guarantees/demonstration
• Provide inputs to warranty requirements• Provide maintenance data for the logistic
support analysis record• Support post delivery design changes• Inputs
– Task Time (MH)– Task Frequency (MTBM)
Number of Personnel-Elapsed Time (hours)For each repairable item
23
Bottoms Up Models
• Input Data Sources– Task Frequency
Reliability predictions de-rated to account for non-relevant failures
Because many failures are repaired on equipment, the off equipment task frequency will be less than the task frequency for on equipment
24
Bottoms Up Models
• Input Data Sources (Continued)– Task Time
Touch time vs. total time That time expended by the technician to
effect the repair Touch time is design controllable
Total Time Includes the time that the technician
expends in “Overhead” functions such as part procurement and paper work
Are developed from industrial engineering data and analyst’s estimates
25
Task Analysis Model
• Task analysis modeling estimates repair time– MIL-HDK-472 method V– Spreadsheet template
Allow parallel and multi-person tasks estimation
Calculates elapsed time and staff hoursReports each task element and total repair
timeSums staff hours by repairmen typeEstimates impact of hard to reach/see
tasks
26
Why Do Maintainability Modeling?
• To identify the important issues• To quantify and prioritize these issues• To build better design and support systems
27
Design Guidelines for Maintainability9
• General Guidelines– Plan and Implement a concept for automatic
fault detection down to the last LRU– Partition the equipment– Aim for standardization of parts, tools, and
testing equipment– Conceive operation and maintenance
procedures to be as simple as possible– Consider environmental conditions
28
• Testability– Degrees of failure detection and isolation– The correctness of test results– Test duration
• Accessibility and Exchangeability– Provide self-latching access flaps– Plan for accessibility– Use preferably indirect plug connectors– Provide for speedy replaceability– Prevent faulty installation or connection
Design Guidelines for Maintainability9
29
• Operation and Adjustment– Use high standardization in selecting
operational tools– Consider human aspects– Order all steps of a procedure in a logical
sequence– Describe system status– Avoid any form of hardware adjustments
Design Guidelines for Maintainability9
30
Elements & Terminology of Maintainability
• MTTR: Mean Time to Repair
• T0.5: Median Time to Repair
• TMAX: Maximum Time to Repair)
usually the 95th percentile• MTTPM: Mean Time to Preventive Maintenance• MTBPM: Mean Time Between Preventive
Maintenance• MDT: Mean Down Time• MTBM: Mean Time Between Maintenance
31
Maintainability Prediction
• System Mean Time to Repair, MTTRS
System without redundancy
E1 E2 En
n
1ii
n
1iii
n
1i i
n
1i i
i
λ
MTTRλ
MTBF1
MTBFMTTR
MTTRs
32
Maintainability Prediction
• Example 1: Compute the mean time to repair at the system level for the following system.
• Solution:
MTTF = 500 hMTTR = 2 h
MTTF = 400 hMTTR = 2.5 h
MTTF = 250 hMTTR = 1 h
MTTF = 100 hMTTR = 0.5 h
hh
h
hh
h
hh
h
hh
h
hh
MTTRs 04.10185.0
01925.0
1001
1005.0
2501
2501
4001
4005.2
5001
5002
1
33
Maintainability Prediction
• Example 2: How does the MTTRs of the system in the previous example change if an active redundancy is introduced to the element with MTTF = 100h?
• Solution:
hh
h
hh
h
hh
h
hh
h
hh
h
hh
MTTRs 85.00285.0
02425.0
1001
1005.0
1001
1005.0
2501
2501
4001
4005.2
5001
5002
1
MTTF = 100 hMTTR = 0.5 h
MTTF = 100 hMTTR = 0.5 h
MTTF = 500 hMTTR = 2 h
MTTF = 400 hMTTR = 2.5 h
MTTF = 250 hMTTR = 1 h
34
MTTF and MTBF
Mean Time to Failure (or Between Failures) MTTF (or MTBF) is the expected Time to Failure (or Between Failures)
Remarks:MTBF provides a reliability figure of merit for expected failure free operation MTBF provides the basis for estimating the number of failures in a given period of time Even though an item may be discarded after failure and its mean life characterized by MTTF, it may be meaningful to characterize the system reliability in terms of MTBF if the system is restored after item failure.
00
)()( dttRdtttfMTBF
35
Logistics Systems EngineeringModeling & Analysis of Time to Repair
NTUSY-521-N
SMUSYS 7340
Dr. Jerrell T. Stracener, SAE Fellow
36
Definition
• Maintainability is an inherent design characteristic of a system or product and it pertains to the ease, accuracy, safety, and economy in the performance of maintenance actions.2
• Maintainability can be created into a four-part definition:3 1. Maintainability is the probability that a failed system2. will be restored to specified performance3. within a stated period of time4. when maintained under specified conditions.
37
Definition
• Maintainability is a characteristic of an item, expressed by the probability that preventive maintenance (serviceability) or repair (repairability) of the item will be performed within a stated time interval by given procedures and resources (number and skill level of the personnel, spare parts, test facilities, etc.).4
• Maintainability is the ability of an item to be retained in, or restored to, a specified condition when maintenance is performed by people having specified skill levels, using prescribed procedures and resources.5
38
Maintenance and Design8
• The system’s design determines its requirements for maintenance– Reliability (How often maintenance)– Configuration (How much time for access)– Built in Test (Fault Isolation Time)– Subassembly life span (Inspection/forced
replacement)– Adjustment/alignment requirements
(Inspection)– Capacity/fill rate (Servicing)– Corrosion susceptibility (Inspection/repair)
39
Normal Distribution:
A random variable X is said to have a normal (orGaussian) distribution with parameters and ,where - < < and > 0, with probability density function
- < x <
where = 3.14159… and e = 2.7183...
22
x2
1
e2
1)x(f
f(x)
x
40
Normal Distribution:
• Mean or expected value of X
Mean = E(X) =
• Median value of X
X0.5 =
• Standard deviation
)(XVar
41
Normal Distribution:
Standard Normal Distribution
If X ~ N(, ) and if , then Z ~ N(0, 1).
A normal distribution with = 0 and = 1, is calledthe standard normal distribution.
X
Z
42
x
0
z
x
Z
Normal Distribution:
f(x) f(z)
43
Normal Distribution:
Standard Normal Distribution Table of Probabilities
http://www.smu.edu/~christ/stracener/cse7370/normaltable.html
Enter table with
and find thevalue of
z0
z
f(z)
x
Z
44
Normal Distribution - example
The following example illustrates every possible case of application of the normal distribution.
Let X ~ N(100, 10)
Find:a. P(X < 105.3)b. P(X 91.7)c. P(87.1 < X 115.7)d. the value of x for which P(X x) = 0.05
45
Normal Distribution - example solution
a. P(X < 105.3) =
= P(Z < 0.53) = 0.7019
10
1003.105P
x
100
x
0
z
f(x) f(z)
105.3 0.53
46
Normal Distribution - example solution
b. P(X 91.7) =
= P(Z > - 0.83)= 1 - P(Z -0.83) = 1 - 0.2033= 0.7967
10
1007.91
x
P
100
x
0
z
f(x) f(z)
91.7 -0.83
47
Normal Distribution - example solution
c. P(87.1 < X 115.7) =
= P(-1.29 < Z < 1.57)= F(1.57) - F(-1.29)= 0.9418 - 0.0985 = 0.8433
7.115
10
1001.87
x
P
100
x
f(x)
87.1 115.7
48
Normal Distribution - example solution
d. P(X x) = 0.05P(Z z) = 0.05 implies that z = 1.64P(X x) =
therefore
x - 100 = 16.4x = 116.4
10
100
10
100 xZP
xxP
64.110
100
x
100
x
f(x)
116.4
49
Normal Distribution - Example:
The time it takes a field engineer to restore a function in a logistics system can be modeled with a normal distribution having mean value 1.25 hours and standard deviation 0.46 hours. What is the probability that the time is between 1.00 and 1.75 hours? If we view 2 hours as a critically time, what is the probability that actual time to restore the function will exceed this value?
50
Normal Distribution - Example Solution:
75.100.1 XP
46.0
25.175.1
46.0
25.100.1XP
09.154.0 XP
54.009.1
5675.02946.08621.0
51
Normal Distribution - Example Solution:
46.0
25.122 ZPXP
63.1163.1 ZP
0516.0
52
The Lognormal Model:
Definition - A random variable X is said to have the Lognormal Distribution with parameters and , where > 0 and > 0, if the probability density function of X is:
, for x > 0
, for x 0
22
xln2
1
e2x
1 )x(f
0
53
Properties of the Lognormal Distribution
Probability Distribution Function
where (z) is the cumulative probability distribution function of N(0,1)
Rule: If T ~ LN(,), then Y = lnT ~ N(,)
xln
)x(F
54
Properties of the Lognormal Model:
• Mean or Expected Value
2
2
1
e)X(E
1ee)X(Var222
• Variance
• Median
ex 5.0
55
Lognormal Model example
The elapsed time (hours) to repair an item is a random variable. Based on analysis of data, elapsedtime to repair can be modeled by a lognormal distribution with parameters = 0.25 and = 0.50.
a. What is the probability that an elapsed time to repair will exceed 0.50 hours?b. What is the probability that an elapsed time torepair will be less than 1.2 hours?c. What is the median elapsed time to repair?d. What is the probability that an elapsed time torepair will exceed the mean elapsed time to repair?e. Sketch the cumulative probability distributionfunction.
56
Lognormal Model example - solution
a. What is the probability that an elapsed time to repair will exceed 0.50 hours?
X ~ LN(, ) where = 0.25 and = 0.50
note that:Y = lnX ~ N(, )
P(X > 0.50) = P(lnX > -0.693)
0.50
0.250.693
σ
μlnXP
89.1P Z
9716.0
57
Lognormal Model example
b. What is the probability that an elapsed time torepair will be less than 1.2 hours?
P(X < 1.20) = P(lnX < ln1.20)
0.50
0.25182.0
σ
μlnXP
136.0P Z
4404.0
58
Lognormal Model example
c. What is the median elapsed time to repair?
P(X < x0.5) = 0.5
therefore
5.0lnP
xZ
0P Z
5.0
0ln 5.0
x
25.0ln 5.0 x
284.125.05.0 eex
59
Lognormal Model example
d. What is the probability that an elapsed time torepair will exceed the mean elapsed time to repair?
2
σμ
2
eMTTR
2
50.025.0
2
e
375.0e
455.1
60
Lognormal Model example
P(X > MTTR) = P(X > 1.455)
= P(lnX > 0.375)
0.50
0.250.375
σ
μlnXP
0.25ZP
4013.0
61
Lognormal Model example
e. Sketch the cumulative probability distributionfunction.
Cumulative Probability Distribution Function
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
time to repair
P(t
<x)
tmax
62
1 Clint Van Pelt, “Maintainability and Modeling Analysis”, March 31, 19922 Benjamin S. Blanchard and Wolter J. Fabrychy, “Systems Engineering
and Analysis,” Second Edition (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1990), pp. 389-390.
3 Daniel L. Babcock, “Managing Engineering and Technology,” Second Edition (New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1996), p. 209.
4 Prof. Dr. Alessandro Birolini, “Reliability Engineering: Theory and Practice,” Third Edition (Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1999), p.115.
5 USAF R&M 20006 Benjamin S. Blanchard and Wolter J. Fabrychy, “Systems Engineering
and Analysis,” Second Edition (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1990), p. 394.
7 Clint Van Pelt, “Maintainability and Modeling Analysis”, March 31, 19928 Ibid
References
63
9 Prof. Dr. Alessandro Birolini, “Reliability Engineering: Theory and Practice,” Third Edition (Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1999), pp. 145-148.
References