liz lanza, director office of compulsive and problem ... pixler, liz lanza, stephen... · liz...

50
Liz Lanza, Director Office of Compulsive and Problem Gambling PA Gaming Control Board

Upload: halien

Post on 17-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Liz Lanza, Director

Office of Compulsive and Problem Gambling

PA Gaming Control Board

Mandated by the PA Legislature in the PA

Racehorse Development and Gaming Act of

2004

Regulated, administered and maintained by

the PGCB’s Office of Compulsive and Problem

Gambling.

A voluntary program to assist problem

gamblers to be excluded from

participating in legalized gaming

activities under the jurisdiction of the

PGCB and from receiving any gaming

privileges that may be a temptation such

as check cashing privileges, player club

membership, complimentary goods and

services, targeted mailings and

promotional materials related to gaming

activities.

Self-Exclusion only applies to the

gaming floor of gaming facilities in

Pennsylvania.

However a casino licensee may ban self-

excluded persons from their entire

property and/or their properties in

other jurisdictions.

Self-Exclusion is a tool to help

problem gamblers distance

themselves from the temptation

of gambling. This program is

also used as a gateway to

treatment.

Is:

A forum for the problem

gambler to accept

personal responsibility

for the problem

A method to provide the

problem gambler with

some isolation from the

temptations of gambling

A deterrent to

destructive behavior

Is NOT:

A cure-all

A substitute for

treatment

A program for someone

who occasionally gambles

irresponsibly but is not a

chronic or pathological

gambler

The person filing the request for Self-Exclusion

may request to be excluded from gaming

activities for one of the following:

One Year

Five Years

Lifetime

Self-exclusions for 1 or 5 years remain in effect

until the self-excluded person requests removal

from the list. A person may, upon the conclusion

of the period of self-exclusion, request to be

removed from the list by submitting, in person, a

completed request for removal.

Self-excluded individuals identified on the

gaming floor/property of a casino in PA.

Winnings are forfeited

Arrest made by PA State Police

Appear in front of District Justice

Fine

Future for PA violators- therapeutic justice

There have been 5,369

voluntary requests from

individuals for placement on

the PGCB Self-Exclusion List

*Self-exclusions do not expire. Individuals who have

requested 1 or 5 years, may, at the conclusion of the

period selected, request to be removed from the self-

exclusion list.

*Age at intake

• Self-excluded individuals who reported to have sought treatment: 24% or 1271 individuals.

• Self-excluded individuals who reported to be Self-excluded in other jurisdictions: 7.3% or 390 individuals.

• Self-excluded individuals who reported to have gambled in PA facilities prior to self-exclusion: 68% or 3659 individuals

• Age range of self-excluded individuals: 21-89 years*

Percentage is based on voluntary answers given at time of intake

*Age at intake

932 known violations of the terms of self-exclusion.

As of June 1, 2013, there have been 1,018 requests for removal.

247 individuals who had removed themselves from the Self-Exclusion List have since voluntarily placed themselves back on the list. That is 24% of all removals.

264 days is the average number of days before signing back up on the self-exclusion list

Of the 1,018 Removals • 402 individuals admitted to gambling in other

jurisdictions while on the PA Self-Exclusion List.

• 97 individuals admitted to gambling in Pennsylvania while on the PA Self-Exclusion List.

• 128 individuals admitted to seeking treatment while on the PA Self-Exclusion List.

• 50 individuals admitted to signing up for self-exclusion in other jurisdictions while on the PA Self-Exclusion List.

Stephen L. Martino, Director

Maryland Lottery and Gaming Control Agency

Authorized under Maryland Regulation (COMAR 36.01.03)

Administered by the Maryland Lottery and Gaming Control Agency

Operational since January 2011

Sample application and FAQ can be found at: http://mdlottery.com/about-us/responsible-play/

The Maryland Voluntary Exclusion Program is a

tool of personal responsibility.

Applications are made in-person with a MLGCA

staff member.

Individuals may elect a two-year or lifetime ban.

Prohibited from entering any Maryland gaming

facility, accessing any gaming privileges (check

cashing, cash advance, players club membership,

comps, or direct mailings)

Violators are subject to arrest/citation for

criminal trespass and forfeiture of jackpot

winnings.

56

104

81

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2011 2012 2013

Enrollment by Year

Casino openings:

* September 2010 * January 2011

* June 2012 * May 2013

126

118

Male Female

Enrollment by Gender

Two year, 121 Lifetime, 123

Duration*

* Voluntary exclusions do not expire. Individuals may, at the conclusion of the two year period, request to be removed from

the Maryland Voluntary Exclusion Program.

57

69

64

54

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Two Year Lifetime

Duration Chosen by Gender

Male Female

6

38

50

80

48

21

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

21-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 Over 65

Age Groups

2

3

1 1

2

5

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

2011 2012 2013

Violations

Two Year Lifetime

Traditional Lottery Voluntary Exclusion

Program launched May 20, 2013.

Maryland is the 3rd state to operate a

traditional lottery program.

As of June 27, 2013 – 9 enrollments

Self-Exclusion Program

July 19, 2013 Larissa T. Pixler NCPG SE Interstate Comparison 31

Tribal/State Compacts authorize and require the

process Section 3v(2)A-K

Arizona Department of Gaming Self-Exclusion Form

Download from www.azgaming.gov or

www.problemgambling.az.gov 11/8/2007

Fill in every box; aka would be “Jim” for James

Must have a physical street address

Race/Ethnicity

Select one, five, or ten years for self ban

Patron and Notary signature dates must match

Legible

July 19, 2013 Larissa T. Pixler NCPG SE Interstate Comparison 32

Color Photograph

Close up of the person’s head, neck, shoulders

Consistent place and pose for best lighting

Scars / Tattoos: What is visible!

Optional Information: Encourage people to

mark only the truly problematic activities

All Arizona casinos and all associated services

Restaurants

Shows

Harrah’s / Caesar’s Entertainment caveat

July 19, 2013 Larissa T. Pixler NCPG SE Interstate Comparison 33

Irrevocable

Consequences for Violation of Self Exclusion

Forfeit Jackpot

Escort Out; Citation or Arrest for Trespassing

Additional days/months to Permanent Barr

The State, Tribe, and/or Casino are not responsible for financial loss

July 19, 2013 Larissa T. Pixler NCPG SE Interstate Comparison 34

Self-Exclusion

July 19, 2013 Larissa T. Pixler NCPG SE Interstate Comparison 35

Arizona Department of Gaming

Self-Exclusion Form

Full

Name:

SS #:

Street Address:

Date of

Birth:

City:

State:

Zip

Code:

Home

Phone:

Business

Phone

Driver’s

License #/State

Height:

Weight:

Hair:

Eyes:

Sex:

Any other names used (a.k.a.):

Scars/Tattoos:

Race:

__________I request information be mailed to me describing services available to help me with my gambling problem.

(Initials required; no return address will be used.)

Optional Information: Gambling activities that cause the most problems (mark all that apply) Slots Poker

Blackjack Bingo Keno Horse/Dog Races Video Poker Lottery Sports Internet Stocks

Please print clearly:

I, _____________________________________, acknowledge that I am a problem gambler and voluntarily seek to

exclude myself from Indian Gaming Facilities in Arizona.* With my initials, I hereby request and authorize the

Arizona Department of Gaming to place my name on the list of self-excluded persons for a period of

one year_____, five years_____, or ten years_____. (Initial the specific time period you are selecting.)

July 19, 2013 Larissa T. Pixler NCPG SE Interstate Comparison 36

Although the self-exclusion list is provided only to Arizona casinos, there may be casino

management companies operating Arizona casinos, such as Harrah’s, which have a policy that any

person excluded from one of their casinos is excluded from all of their casinos throughout the

country.

I have reviewed and understand the following terms and restrictions of this self-

exclusion and agree to all of them:

• This exclusion is valid for all Indian Gaming Facilities within the State of Arizona and

all services associated with those Gaming Facilities.

• I will not attempt to enter and/or use any of the services or privileges of the Gaming

Facilities from which I have requested exclusion during the period of this self-exclusion.

• I understand that the Tribal Gaming Office shall require the Gaming Facility Operator

to take reasonable steps to identify self-excluded persons who may be in a Gaming

Facility and, once identified, promptly escort the self-excluded person from the Gaming

Facility.

• I understand the ultimate responsibility to limit my access to all Indian Gaming

Facilities within the State of Arizona and/or gaming services remains mine alone.

• This self-exclusion request is irrevocable during the time period indicated above.

• The Arizona Department of Gaming will treat this self-exclusion request

confidentially. However, pursuant to Section 3(v)(D) of the Compact, the State Gaming

Agency shall, on a monthly basis, provide the compiled information to the Tribal

Gaming Office. The Tribe shall treat the information received from the State Gaming

Agency under this Section as confidential and such information shall not be disclosed

except to the Gaming Facility Operator and other tribal gaming offices for inclusion on

their lists, or to appropriate law enforcement agencies, if needed, in the conduct of an

official investigation or unless ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction.

Date________________ __________________________________

Signature

State of _____________________

County of ___________________

Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me this ____ day of ___________________, 20___.

_____________________________

Notary Public

[Place notary seal above] My Commission expires:_____________

Mail or deliver completed form, with minimum 2” x 3” original color photograph (head and shoulders) to:

Larissa T. Pixler Note: A clearly-identified digital JPEG picture may

Arizona Department of Gaming be sent by e-mail to [email protected]

1110 W. Washington, Suite 450

Phoenix, Arizona 85007

July 19, 2013 Larissa T. Pixler NCPG SE Interstate Comparison 37

July 19, 2013 Larissa T. Pixler NCPG SE Interstate Comparison 38

The Male/Female percentage

in late 2003 and 2004 was

49%/51% - the only time

there were more females.

From 05 to present, the total

has been between 53 & 55%

male.

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Male Female

53% 1429

47% 1341

2,870 Total Individuals

One Five Ten

2011

M: 8% 25% 66%

F: 10% 30% 60%

2009

M: 8% 30% 61%

F: 11% 34% 55%

2007

M: 14% 28% 58%

F: 15% 33% 52%

July 19, 2013 Larissa T. Pixler NCPG SE Interstate Comparison 39

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

One Year Five Years Ten Years

11%

26%

63%

7%

20%

73%

Duration Chosen by Gender

Female

Male

July 19, 2013 Larissa T. Pixler NCPG SE Interstate Comparison 40

One Five Ten

2011: 9% 27% 64%

2009: 10% 32% 58%

2007: 15% 30% 55%

2005: 22% 27% 51%

2003: 46% 19% 35%

One Year

n = 255

9%

Five

Years

n = 652

23% Ten Years

n = 1963

68%

Total Duration Chosen in

Percentages

July 19, 2013 Larissa T. Pixler NCPG SE Interstate Comparison 41

Asian 8%

5Black 4%

Cauc. 65%

Hispanic 15%

Middle Eastern

4%

Native American

2% Other

1%

Race/Ethnicity

July 19, 2013 Larissa T. Pixler NCPG SE Interstate Comparison 42

ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF GAMING

Self Excluded Male and Female Age Groups

As of May 31, 2013

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

Age 21-24 Age 25-34 Age 35-44 Age 45-54 Age 55-64 Over 65

5%

23%

30%

23%

14%

5%

1%

9%

23%

33%

25%

9%

Male

Female

July 19, 2013 Larissa T. Pixler NCPG SE Interstate Comparison 43

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

OneYear

FiveYears

TenYears

Totals

23

194 788

1005 6

60 291 357

255 652

1963

2870 Violations

Rescind Requests

SE Totals

Self-Exclusion

Violations and

Rescind Requests

current through

31 May 2013. Of the

1,963 Ten Year S/E’s,

there are 788

reported Violations &

291 Rescind Requests.

July 19, 2013 Larissa T. Pixler NCPG SE Interstate Comparison 44

Month 2-13 2-12 2-11 2-10 2-09 2-08 2-07 2-06 2-05 2-04 2-03 Total

Jan 55 47 58 50 56 53 67 28 74 48 0 434

Feb 52 45 33 35 48 56 53 80 48 41 0 394

Mar 45 35 53 57 63 62 53 44 41 45 0 418

Apr 39 39 40 52 40 51 52 56 40 54 2 385

May 44 36 44 40 57 59 50 50 38 45 23 383

Jun 36 49 64 49 50 32 39 54 37 38 374

Jul 32 36 44 51 64 83 45 55 47 38 425

Aug 69 56 44 60 74 60 85 40 43 39 462

Sep 41 32 36 50 53 67 57 64 47 22 406

Oct 49 40 45 45 38 53 41 56 48 34 366

Nov 48 37 38 39 40 42 53 32 44 35 325

Dec 39 40 34 24 27 40 27 68 41 24 301

Total 235 516 518 539 582 627 652 605 610 540 255 5444

July 19, 2013 Larissa T. Pixler NCPG SE Interstate Comparison 45

2-13 2-12 2-11 2-10 2-09 2-08 2-07 2-06 2-05 2-04 2-03 Total

Male 106 257 276 275 279 312 343 332 333 273 125 2805

Fem 129 259 242 264 303 315 309 273 277 267 130 2639

Total 235 516 518 539 582 627 652 605 610 540 255 5444

July 19, 2013 Larissa T. Pixler NCPG SE Interstate Comparison 46

Start SE Total Female% Male% Duration Duration%

Arizona~ 2003 2,870 47% 53% 1, 5, 10 9%, 23%, 68%

California~ 2007 2,464 23% 77% 1, 5, Life 31%, 22%, 46%

Colorado 2010 253 54% 46% 3, 5, 10, Life 7%, 6%, 1%, 85%

Delaware 2004 260 51% 49% 1, 5, Life 26%, 22%, 51%

Illinois 2002 10,017 46% 54% Lifetime***

Indiana 2004 5,783 46% 54% 1, 5, Life 39%, 24%, 37%

Iowa~ 2004 6,431 Lifetime

Kansas 2010 255 42% 58% 2, Life 56%, 44%

Maryland~ 2011 244 48% 52% 2, Life 49%, 51%

Michigan~ 1997 3,197 38% 62% Lifetime

Mississippi~ 2003 1,533 55% 45% 5, 10, Life 48%, 8%, 44%

Missouri~ 1996 13,810 47% 53% 5, Life 57%, 43%

New Jersey~ 2001 1,329 1, 5, Life 20%, 33%, 47%

Pennsylvania~ 2006 5,369 43% 57% 1, 5, Life 56%, 20%, 24%

July 19, 2013 Larissa T. Pixler NCPG SE Interstate Comparison 47

Asian Blk Cauc. Hisp. M.East Native Other UNK

Arizona~ 8% 5% 65% 15% 4% 2% 1%

California~ 40% 8% 22% 13% 5% 0% 11% 1%

Colorado 11% 2% 75% 9% 1% 2%

Delaware

Illinois 9% 17% 68% 4% < 1% 2%

Indiana

Iowa~

Kansas 23% 5% 60% 12% < 1% < 1%

Maryland~ 7% 20% 69% 1% < 1% 2%

Michigan~

Mississippi~ 6% 32% 62%

Missouri~ 5% 19% 69% 2% 1% 1% 1% 3%

New Jersey~

Pennsylvania~ 5% 13% 78% 2% 1% 1% 1%

July 19, 2013 Larissa T. Pixler NCPG SE Interstate Comparison 48

21-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65 + UNK

Arizona~ 91 478 765 803 541 192

California~ 41 629 825 589 304 76

Colorado 5 34 65 75 52 16 6

Delaware

Illinois 659 2840 5381 1137

Indiana 103 909 1413 1691 1227 437 3

Iowa~

Kansas 9 40 82 74 35 15

Maryland~ 7 37 50 81 48 21

Michigan~

Mississippi~ 21 125 235 824 312 16

Missouri~

New Jersey~

Pennsylvania~ 208 836 1265 1436 1093 504

July 19, 2013 Larissa T. Pixler NCPG SE Interstate Comparison 49

Start Duration Violations Rscnd.Rqst $ Seized

Arizona~ 2003 1, 5, 10 23, 194, 788 6, 60, 291 727,453.66

California~ 2007 1, 5, Life 780 61 91,141.43

Colorado 2010 3, 5, 10, Life

Delaware 2004 1, 5, Life

Illinois 2002 Lifetime*** 3,131 1,308,260.06

Indiana 2004 1, 5, Life

Iowa~ 2004 Lifetime

Kansas 2010 2, Life 25

Maryland~ 2011 2, Life 14

Michigan~ 1997 Lifetime

Mississippi~ 2003 5, 10, Life 988

Missouri~ 1996 5, Life

New Jersey~ 2001 1, 5, Life

Pennsylvania~ 2006 1, 5, Life 517, 189, 226 1018 352,818.23

If you have any questions:

Larissa T. Pixler

Office of Problem Gambling

Program Administrator

602.255.3813

Cell: 602.402.4887

[email protected]

July 19, 2013 Larissa T. Pixler NCPG SE Interstate Comparison 50