lit com mtg
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
K-12 Literacy Committee
K-12 Literacy CommitteeMeeting
K-12 Literacy Committee
Desired Outcomes
Understand the need for a Literacy PlanAgree on what Literacy means
Increase knowledge and understanding for: The Common Core Standards
Schedule next meeting
K-12 Literacy Committee
Code of Cooperation
Actively ParticipateListen as an Ally
Speak from AwarenessSuspend CertaintyCelebrate diversity
Stay Engaged Mind the Schedule
K-12 Literacy Committee
The farther backward you can look, the farther forward you are likely to see.
Winston Churchill
Future-Ready Students for the21st Century
The guiding mission of the SBE
is that every public school student
will graduate from high school,
globally competitive for work and
postsecondary education and
prepared for life in the 21st Century.
We are all accountable!
Of Every 100 9th Graders in North Carolina…
6
Source: NCHEMS Information Center for Higher Education Policymaking and Analysis. Student Pipeline - Transition andCompletion Rates from 9th Grade to College. www.higheredinfo.org/dbrowser/index.php?submeasure=119&year=2006&level=nation&mode=data&state=0. 2010
Key Components
www.p21.org
www.ncteachingconditions.org
Serves as a guide for North
Carolina’s school
superintendents as they reflect
upon and improve their
effectiveness as district leaders.
Focuses the goals and
objectives of districts as they
support, monitor and
evaluate their superintendents.
Guides professional
development for superintendents and serves as a
tool in developing
coaching and mentoring
programs for superintendents.
Informs higher education
programs in developing the
content and requirements of superintendent
degree programs.
New Standards and Evaluation Systems
Formative, Growth Data-
drivenPD Alignment
Teacher Education Programs
AdministratorEducation Programs
M.S.A.
Administrator Education Programs
Ed.D
Teacher Evaluation
System
School Executive Evaluation
System
(Principals and Asst. Principals)
Superintendent Evaluation
System
(Including Central Office Staff)
10
ALIGNMENT
11
Work collaboratively with all school personnel to create a professional learning community
Provides structures for the development of effective professional learning communities aligned with the school improvement plan, focused on results, and characterized by collective responsibility for instructional planning and for 21st century student learning
Provides for the development of effective professional learning communities aligned with the district strategic plan, focused on results, and characterized by collective responsibility for 21st century student learning
ALIGNMENT
Governor Perdue’s Education Initiative
12
Ready – increase number of students who can read, write and do math at the end of grade 3
Set – increase number of students performing at or above grade level
Go – increase number of students taking college credit courses in high school, graduating from high school, going to a 4-year college/university or community college
Newer ACRE work streams connecting directly with teachers, leaders, parents and students
Ongoing central work to revise standards, assessment and accountability
Newer work to deliver new standards, assessments and teaching tools
Newer work to build LEA capacity to implement online tools
Standards Assessment Accountability
Formative
Summative
Benchmark
Instructional Technology and Infrastructure InitiativesCreating tools and providing consulting-services that help enable a move to instructional and assessment models that take full advantage of
online technologies and technologies yet to be developed. Included are the creation of the State School Technology Plan, One-to-One pilot support, and planning and consulting to help LEAs build infrastructure, allocate resources and plan logistics to move to online assessment.
A revised model that includes measures of post-secondary readiness, robust, fair growth measures, revised reporting functions and motivates behavior that improves student outcomes.
Diverse communication strategies that memorably inform all stakeholders (esp. students, parents, teachers, principals) and build understanding and investment in ACRE. Communication strategies include website, webinar series, listserves, internal newsletter and LEA concierge service.
Tools and training, blending online and face-to-face learning experiences to help educators increase effectiveness and transition to new standards and assessments. Included are the creation of instructional toolkits, NC Falcon formative assessment training modules, new standards roll-out, using data to make decisions and Response to Instruction.
Learner Management System (LMS)Single, user-friendly online platform to house and deliver new tools, particularly the
delivery of formative and summative assessments, provision of data analysis tools, delivery of professional development and instructional resources to teachers and
establishment of online learning communities.
Professional Development
College and career-ready standards. A new set of academic standards benchmarked against the best national and international expectations. The goal is to set fewer, clearer and higher standards that , when achieved, ensure a student is ready for post-secondary education and work. Standards include Common Core in ELA and Math and NC Essential Standards in all other subjects. Curricular support resources will be developed to support the transition.
A comprehensive assessment system with a focus on using assessments to improve instruction and assess learning and instructional effectiveness. Plan includes updated EOG and EOCs, a tool to build common benchmark assessments and a variety of formative assessment tools including progress monitoring tools, writing assessments, in-class formative assessment training, portfolio assessments and data tools to improve instruction.
PROGRAM MAP
2010-11
Communications &Change
Management
Superintendent Standards
Principal Standards
Teacher Standards
Student Learning
The Lens to use if you are looking for a Focus; NC STANDARDS
The Standards and the NC Evaluation System is a 21st CENTURY SYSTEM
SIP • School Goals• Teacher Goals• Decision Making Process
DATA• EOG/EOC• Formative Assessment• Student Work
PLCs• Problem Solving• Prof Development• Planning
CWTs
• Focused on instructional practice
• Feedback to teachers for growth
EVALProcess
• Teacher Behaviors• Student Behaviors• Coaching
PLCs
• Data review• Instruction &
Planning• Collaboration
Common Core
• Teaching with Blooms Revised
• Rigorous content• Meaningful Use of
Knowledge • Writing
Formative Assessment
• Performance based• Communication• “Informative
assessment”
Literacy• Elementary instruction• Secondary instruction• Across all content
Teacher Standard IV:Teachers Facilitate learning for their students
K-12 Literacy Committee
Where are We?
K-12 Literacy Committee
Transformation
• Help establish Collaborative Environment for students and staff
• Build Leadership Capacity for principals and administrators
• Provide coaching for principals and teachers• Assist with the alignment of the NC Evaluation
process and district initiatives
2009-2010 Accountability Highlights
• High Growth District• Exited LEA School Improvement • Biggest Increase in Proficiency South Central Region
(7.5)• Third Highest Proficiency Increase in the State• 16 of 19 Schools Met Expected Growth• 11 Schools Met High Growth• 4 Schools of Distinction (80% proficiency and meet
growth targets)
44.7%
56.7%
64.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
Proficiency Rates, 2007-2008 through 2009-2010:Reading in Grades 3-8
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
56.6%
69.8%
76.3%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
Proficiency Rates, 2007-2008 through 2009-2010:Math in Grades 3-8
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
62.7% 63.1%
81.5%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
Proficiency Rates, 2007-2008 through 2009-2010:EOC Composite in Grades 9-12
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
K-12 Literacy Committee
Columbus County EOG Reading Scores
Grade 07-08 08-09 09-103 45.3 52.5 61.6
4 44.2 61.68 68.2
5 44 53.7 64.2
6 45.6 60.1 65.6
7 45.6 56 66.3
8 43.6 57 59.1
K-12 Literacy Committee
Where are we Going? RttT
Measure State/LEA Baseline Targets
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Gr 4 Read State 71.6 74.6 77.6 80.6 83.6
LEA 68.2 71.2 74.2 77.2 80.2
Gr 4 Math State 83.0 85.0 87.0 89.0 91.0
LEA 77.5 80.5 83.5 86.5 88.5
Gr 8 Read State 69.2 72.2 75.2 78.2 81.2
LEA 59.1 63.2 66.3 69.4 72.5
Gr 8 Math State 83.9 86.9 89.9 92.9 95.9
LEA 79.5 81.8 84.1 86.4 88.6
Grad Rate State 71.7% 74% 76% 79% 82%
LEA 72.4% 74.9% 77.4% 79.9% 82%
Avg SAT Com State 1008 (63%) 1009 (65%) 1014 (67%) 1019 (69%) 1025 (72%)
LEA 910 (38.5%) 920 (43.5%) 940 (48.5%) 970 (53.5%) 990 (58.%)
K-12 Literacy Committee
Where are We going?
• June 30: Draft a K-12 Literacy Plan aligned with the plan to the RttT Scope of Work Plan– The Plan will include a K-12 Literacy Structure– The Plan will continued Professional Development– The Plan will include a calendar for the K-12
Literacy Committee and Advisory Committees– The Plan will include the implementation for the
Common Core Standards
K-12 Literacy Committee
K-12 Literacy Committee
K-12 Literacy Committee
Training Components
InitialTraining
Follow Up
On-SiteCoaches
GuidedPractice
Small Group
Sharing
ObserveCo-Teach
K-12 Literacy Committee
Key Comprehension Routine
Main Idea
Top Down Web
2 Column Notes
Summarizing Generate Questions
K-12 Literacy Committee
Middle School/High School PD PlanKey Comprehension Routine (KCR)
Key Vocabulary Routine (KVR)
November 22-23, 2010 KCR 2 Day Initial Training5 people
January 4-5, 2011 KVR 2 Day Initial Training5 people
February 7, 2011 KCR Overview for Administrators19 peopleFebruary 8-9, 2011 KCR 2 Day Initial Training
26 peopleFebruary 28-March1, 2011 KCR Coaches Training18 peopleVarious Dates KCR PLC Meetings
30 peopleMarch 21-22, 2011 KCR Follow Up Sessions
32 peopleVarious Dates KCR PLC Meetings
30 peopleMay 9-10, 2011 KCR Follow Up Sessions
32 peopleJuly 27-28, 2011 KCR 2 Day Initial Training (Tent) 40 peopleSeptember 14-15, 2011 KVR 2 Day Initial Training
40 peopleOctober 10-11, 2011 KVR Coaches Training
25 peopleOctober 12-14, 2011 KCR Level I Trainer Training
4 peopleOctober 31- November 1, 2011 KVR Follow Up Sessions40 peopleDecember 6-7, 2011 KVR Follow Up Sessions
40 people