length and age composition of commercial snapper landings...

33
ISSN 1 175-1 584 MINISTRY OF FISHERIES Te Tautiaki i nga tini a Tangaroa Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings in SNA 1 and SNA 8,1999-2000 C. Walsh M. Smith N. Davies New Zealand Fisheries Assessment Report 2001152 November 2001

Upload: others

Post on 04-Aug-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

ISSN 1 175-1 584

MINISTRY OF FISHERIES

Te Tautiaki i nga tini a Tangaroa

Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings in SNA 1 and SNA 8,1999-2000

C. Walsh M. Smith N. Davies

New Zealand Fisheries Assessment Report 2001152 November 2001

Page 2: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings in SNA 1 and SNA 8,1999-2000

C. Walsh M. Smith N. Davies

NMrA PO Box 109 695

Newmarke t Auckland

New Zealand Fisheries Assessment Report 2001/52 November 2001

Page 3: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

Published by Ministry of Fisheries Wellington

2001

ISSN 1175-1584

0 Ministry of Fisheries

2001

Citation: Walsh, C.; Smith, M.; Davies, N. (2001).

Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings in SNA 1 and SNA 8,1999-2000.

New Zealand Fisheries Assessment Report 200U52.32 p.

This series continues the informal New Zealand Fisheries Assessment Research Document series

which ceased at the end of 1999.

Page 4: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Walsh, C.; Smith, M.; Davies, N. (2001). Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings in SNA 1 and SNA 8,1999-2000.

New Zealand Fisheries Assessment Report 2001/52.32 p.

This report presents the results of Objectives 1 and 2 of the Ministry of Fisheries project "Estimation of snapper year class strength in SNA 1 and 8" (SNA1999103). The general objective was to determine the commercial length frequency and age structure of the four snapper stocks that constitute SNA 1 and SNA 8 for use in stock assessment models by market sampling.

The length fiequency and age-length key approach was employed in 1999-2000 to estimate catch-at- age for snapper for the main fishing methods in each stock of SNA 1 and SNA 8. Data was derived from length frequency samples collected from the west coast single trawl and pair trawl fisheries and the Bay of Plenty, Hauraki Gulf, and East Northland longline fisheries and combined with age-length keys. Age data was collected randomly in the form of proportional allocation age-length keys for the west coast and Bay of Plenty fisheries, and using the random age frequency approach for the Hauraki Gulf and East Northland longline fisheries. Target sample sizes for both approaches were achieved from all the fisheries sampled.

Year class strengths inferred from the age distributions sampled fiom the SNA 1 longline fisheries in 1999-2000 were generally consistent with trends observed in previous years. Year class strengths inferred for the SNA 8 'stock were less apparent than in previous years, either because of recent strong recruitment or the lack of accumulation of older age classes in the fishery. Strong 1989 and 1991 year classes were evident in all the SNA 1 stocks. The 1995 year class appears to be of above average strength in the Bay of Plenty and East Northland stocks and is likely to recruit as a strong year class into the H a d Gulf stock over the next few years. The recently recruited 1996 year class has appeared strong in the SNA 8 stock, and, combined with the 1995 year class, makes up two of every three fish landed by trawl. Some variability in relative year class strengths was evident between the SNA 1 stocks. The East Northland stock contained particularly strong year classes not evident in the other SNA 1 stocks and a higher percentage of older fish. This may be a reflection of environmental differences that exist in East Northland and the relatively lower fishing mortality in the stock. No similarities in recruitment patterns were apparent between the SNA 1 and SNA 8 stocks. A mean weighted coefficient of variation of below 20% across all age classes in the SNA 1 and SNA 8 catch-at-age compositions was achieved.

Page 5: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

1. INTRODUCTION

Staff of the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) and, formerly, MAF Fisheries have sampled the length and age compositions of snapper from commercial landings in port (market sampling) intermittently since 1963 (Davies et al. 1993). In the 1988-89 fishing year, a structured sampling programme was designed to establish a time series of length and age composition data for the main snapper fisheries in the east and west coast North Island stocks, SNA 1 and SNA 8. Because of heterogeneity in snapper biology and fishing patterns, SNA 1 is often further subdivided into three substocks (referred to herein as stocks): East Northland, Hauraki Gulf, and Bay of Plenty. The time series of length and age information has been surnmarised in previous reports (Davies & Walsh 1995, Walsh et al. 1995, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000). This report presents the results of market sampling between October 1999 and February 2000, thus continuing the time series. Funding for this project, SNA199903, was provided by the Ministry of Fisheries.

The objectives of the market sampling programme for 1999-2000 were as follows.

1. To carry out sampling and estimate the relative year class strength of recruited snapper sampled fiom the commercial longline catch in SNA 1 during spring and summer 1999-2000. The target coefficient of variation (c.v.) for the catch at age will be 20% (mean weightedc.~. across all age classes).

2. To carry out sampling and estimate the relative year class strength of recruited snapper sampled fiom the commercial trawl catch in SNA 8 during spring and summer 1999-2000. The target coefficient of variation (c.v.) for the catch at age will be 20% (mean weightedc.~. across all age classes).

2. METHODS

Landings fiom the snapper fishery were stratified hierarchically by stock, fishing method, and quarterly season, e.g., Bay of Plenty - longline - spring. The stocks correspond to the four areas: west coast North Island, Bay of Plenty, Hauraki Gulf, and East Northland (Figure 1). Fishing methods sampled were longline (BLL) for the SNA 1 stocks and single trawl (BT) and pair trawl (BPI') for the SNA 8 stock. Samples were collected in quarterly season strata, defined as spring (September- November) and summer (December-February). The percentages of the snapper catch taken by method in each of the stocks for 1999-2000 are given in Table 1, illustrating the dominant methods in each stock

A two-stage sampling procedure (West 1978) was used to obtain length frequencies. The random selection of landings and a random sample of bins within landings represent the first and second stages respectively. The procedure for obtaining a random sample for length frequency was modified to account for the grading of fish according to length and quality by employing a stratified random sampling of bins within a landing pavies et al. 1993). All fish in bins making up the sample were measured to the nearest centirnetre below the fork length. As snapper show no differential growth between sexes (Pad 1976), sex was not determined. A detailed description of the sampling design was given by Davies & Walsh (1995). Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries and the SNA 8 single trawl and pair trawl fisheries.

Two methods were employed for the collection of otoliths from landings. The first was a collection of otoliths fiom pair trawl, single trawl, and research trawl catches fiom the west coast and fiom Danish seine and longline catches in the Bay of Plenty to produce age-length keys as described by Davies &

Page 6: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

Walsh (1995). The sample allocation for each length class interval was made according to the west coast single trawl and Bay of Plenty longline proportion at length distributions as estimated for the previous year. To allow for annual variability in the abundance of fish in the 25-26 cm sizerange, a fmed sample size of about 10 otoliths was obtained per centimetre length interval for both collections. Similarly, a fixed sample size of five otoliths was obtained per interval to allow for fish caught below 25 cm. The otolith sample sizes for the west coast and Bay of Plenty collections were determined fiom simulations using the previous years length and age data to derive a mean weighted coefficient of variation (MWCV) of below 20% for catch-at-age estimates.

Age-length keys derived from the age data are assumed to be representative of the seasonal strata of the sample. The main assumption that must be satisfied for an age-length key is that the sample was taken randomly with respect to age from within each length class (Southward 1976).

Calculation of stratum proportions and variances at length and age followed that of Davies & Walsh (1995). Bootstrap mean and variance estimates were not determined for proportion at length and age estimates because the difference between bootstrap and analytical estimates has been found to be negligible (Davies et al. unpublished results). Calculation of mean weight-at-age based on w (g) = 0.044671 2.793 (cm) (Paul 1976), and variances fiom length fiequency samples and age-length keys followed that of Quinn I1 et al. (1983). Proportions at age and mean weight-at-age with analytical estimates of coefficient of variation (c.v.) were calculated for the range of age classes recruited to each stratum, with the maximum age being an aggregate of all age classes over 19 years.

The second method for collecting otoliths was called the random age frequency sampling method and was used for the Hauraki Gulf and East Northland longline fisheries. The age frequency samples were collected by taking random otolith samples from each stratum of the catch. A systematic selection interval was used in sampling. This involved a random sample of bins fiom each landing with the systematic selection of every nth fish counted in a continuous sequence fiom the sampled bins. The optimum selection interval, n, was determined from simulations using data from historical length and age samples that achieved a desired level of precision. This range took account of the expected mean number of fish in a bin and the total number of bins in landings. Sample sizes typically ranged from 15 fish being collected from landings of 10 bins, to 45 fish collected from landings of over 100 bins. A total sample size of 1000 otoliths was targeted for collection fiom each fishery.

Proportion at age and variance (analytical and bootstrap) estimates for the Hauraki Gulf and East Northland longline fisheries were calculated from random age fiequency samples collected from each landing. Essentially, a mean proportion at age for all landings in the sample (weighted by the estimated number of fish in each landing) based on the sample age frequencies, was determined. Bootstrap mean estimates are not presented as the difference between analytical and bootstrap means in proportion at age estimates has been found to be negligible pavies et al., unpublished results).

Random age frequency data were collected to derive catch-at-age estimates. It can be assumed that fish sampled for age were random observations fiom within each length interval. Consequently, proportional allocation age-length keys were able to be derived fiom the random age fiequency otolith samples. Together with the collected length frequency samples, proportions at age and mean weight-at-age with analytical estimates of C.V. were also able to be calculated. Only small differences in proportion at age estimates were obtained using the age-length key and random age frequency approaches (Walsh et al. 1998). However, fish in the larger length classes, collected by the random age ~equency method, were Sequently sampled and are likely to be poorly described.

A standardised procedure for reading otoliths was followed (Davies & Walsh 1995). Age was defined as rounded whole years fiom a nominal birth date of 1 January as described by Davies & Walsh

Page 7: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

(1995), e.g., the 1989 year class was recorded as 11 years old whether sampled in December 1999 or February 2000.

Snapper length and age data were stored on the Ministry of Fisheries market and age databases respectively, held by NTWA.

RESULTS

3.1 Sample collections

Summaries of the length frequency sample sizes for stock-method-season strata are given in Tables 2-5, and summaries of the otolith sample ~ollections in Table 6. Catch data fiom autumn 1999 to summer 1999-2000 are provided in Tables 2-5 to illustrate seasonal patterns in the fisheries. The SNA 8 fishery was concentrated mainly over spring and summer, with single trawl taking less of the landed catch (56%) than in the past few years (Tables 1 and 2). Conversely, the SNA 8 pair trawl catch has risen substantially in recent years to 38% of the overall catch, with all other methods contributing only 6%. Considerable differences are apparent between the percentage of number of landings sampled and the percentage of weight of landings sampled in the west coast single trawl and pair trawl fisheries (see Table 2). This was because samples were taken mainly fiom landings where snapper was the target species. Landings where snapper was a bycatch were generally of lower weight. The summarised information given in Table 2 is for all landings containing snapper (target and bycatch) caught fiom the SNA 8 stock. The SNA 1 fishery was more evenly spread over the entire year, with most of the landed catch fiom the Hauraki Gulf (55%) and East Northland (76%) stocks being taken by longline (Tables 1, 3-5). The Bay of Plenty longline fishery contributed only 13% of the overall catch, with single trawl (49%) and Danish seine (30%) being the main methods used. Snapper was the target species in all SNA 1 longline landings sampled.

3.2 Length and age distributions

For all fisheries sampled in 1999-2000, catch-at-age compositions were derived fiom the combined spring and summer length distributions and used to compare stock and method strata and identrfy year class strengths. However, otolith were not collected consistently in either spring or summer. In

. combining the seasonal data, it is assumed that an age-length key collected fiom spring andlor summer can be applied to the combined spring and summer length data. Because the growth of snapper over 25 cm long is not considerable between spring and summer, this assumption is probably valid for broad comparisons. This assumption has been accepted for other species with growth rates comparable to those of snapper (Westrheim & Ricker 1978).

Sample length and age distributions for the 1999-2000 season derived from the length fi-equency and age-length key approach are presented as histograms (Figures 2-1 1). Age distributions derived fiom the random age frequency approach are given for the Hauraki Gulf and East Northland longline fisheries with analytical and bootstrap variance estimates (Figures 9 and 11). The estimated proportions at length, and age, and mean weight-at-age are shown in Appendices 1,2, and 3. The age- length keys are presented in Appendix 4.

The estimated total number of fish caught in a stock-method-season stratum was calculated fiom the reported total weight landed and the mean fish weight derived fiom stratum length compositions (Appendix 1). Because mean weight is specific to each season, the estimated total number of fish

Page 8: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

caught for the spring-summer combined stratum may not correspond exactly to the sum of the individual season estimates.

3.3 West coast snapper (SNA 8)

The length distribution of the single trawl catch was characterised by one mode which peaked at 32 cm, and had a broad tail extending to over 65 cm (Figure 2). The mean length of snapper sampled from the fishery was 36.3 cm, and the MWCV of the proportions was 0.08. The pair trawl length distribution was very similar to that of single trawl, containing a slightly higher proportion of larger fish (Figure 4). Consequently, the mean length of snapper from the pair trawl fishery was higher at 37.8 cm. It had a MWCV of the proportions of 0.07.

In the single trawl and pair trawl landings the 1996 year class (4 year olds) was very strong, making up 49% and 45% of the catches respectively. The distributions largely comprise fish between 4 and 7 years old, with only 11% and 15% of fish being 8 years old or greater in the single trawl and pair trawl catches respectively. The mean age of snapper from the single trawl fishery was 5.3 years and that of the pair trawl fishery was 5.7 years (Figures 3 and 5). The age distributions from the respective fisheries had MWCVs of 0.10 and 0.1 1.

3.4 East coast snapper (SNA 1)

3.4.1 Bay of Plenty

The length distribution of the Bay of Plenty longline fishery was characterised by a mode at 30 cm with a tail extending to 60 cm and MWCV of 0.1 1 (Figure 6). The mean length was 33.8 cm.

The longline age distribution consisted mainly of fish between 5 and 11 years old, with only 6% of fish being 12 years or more old. The mean age was 7.3 years and the MWCV was 0.16 (Figure 7). Most evident were the strong 1995 and 1994 year classes (5 and 6 year olds) which made up almost half of the longline catch. The 1995 year class appears to be incompletely recruited, containing a relatively high proportion of 25 cm fish (see Appendix 4).

3.4.2 Hauraki Gulf

The length distribution of the Hauraki Gulf longline fishery was characterised by a broad mode at 30 cm with a tail extending to over 60 cm and MWCV of 0.10 (Figure 8). The mean length was 34.9 cm.

. The Hauraki Gulf longline age distribution in 1999-2000 was dominated by the 1994,199 1, and 1989 year classes which relate to 6, 9, and 11 year old fish respectively (Figure 9). The 1989 year class appears l l l y recruited to the fishery, but the 1991 and 1994 year classes still contain a proportion of 25 cm fish (see Appendix 4). Most of the other year classes are of average to low strength, with very few fish over 16 years of age. No large differences in estimates of proportions at age and precision were apparent between the age compositions derived from the age-length key and random age frequency approaches. The mean ages of snapper in the Hauraki Gulf longline fishery were 9.3 and 9.6 years for the age-length key and random age frequency approaches, respectively (see Figure 9). The analytical MWCV for the age-length key approach was 0.10. The analytical and bootstrap W C V s for the random age frequency approach were 0.14 and 0.1 8 respectively.

Page 9: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

3.4.3 East Northland

The length distribution of the East Northland longline fishery had a mode at 29 cm with a tail extending to over 65 cm and MWCV of 0.1 1 (Figure 10). The mean length was 34.6 cm.

The East Northland longline age distribution was relatively broad, containing average year class strengths for most year classes (Figure 11). The 1995 year class (5 year olds) dominates the distribution at present and is not yet fully recruited, containing a high proportion of 25 cm fish (see Appendix 4). The abundance of older fish in East Northland longline fishery has decreased from that of previous years with only 4% of fish 20 years of age or older. The mean age of snapper in the East Northland longline fishery was 9.3 years for both the age-length key and random age frequency approaches (see Figure 1 1). The analytical WCX for the age-length key approach was 0.11. The analytical and bootstrap MWCVs for the random age frequency approach were 0.17 and 0.22 respectively.

4. DISCUSSION

The relative year class strengths inferred fiom the length and age distributions sampled fiom the SNA 1 fisheries in the 1999-2000 season are generally consistent with trends observed in previ'ous years (McKenzie et al. 1992, Davies & Walsh 1995, Walsh et al. 1995, 1997, 1998, 1999,2000). The relative year class strengths for age classes older than 5 years in the SNA 8 trawl fisheries were less apparent than in previous years due to the domination of the recently recruited 1996 year class (4 year olds) and the low abundance of older age classes in catches. In 1999-2000, it was possible to sample fiom all sectors of the fishing industry.

The west coast single trawl and pair trawl age distributions were dominated by the very strong 1996 year class, accounting for over 45% (by number) of all snapper landed in 1999-2000. With this recent recruitment into the fishery, the 1995 year class (5 year olds) that appeared strong in the 1998-99 age distribution now makes up only 20% of the catch in single trawl landings, half that of the year before. As a result, at least two of every three fish landed is of age 4 or 5 years. Yea. class strength estimates fiom a trawl survey of the west coast stock show the 1996 year class to be the second strongest in the past 15 years (Momson & Parkinson 2001). Consequently, the relative abundance of all other age . classes, especially those 8 years of age or older, have lessened considerably, contributing 11% and 15% by number in the single trawl and pair trawl catches respectively. Although the 1996 year class appears strong, there seems to be a lack of accumulation of fish in the older age classes jn the fishery. A comparison between length and age data collected from the single trawl and pair trawl fisheries in 1999-2000 with that collected from the pair trawl fishery in 1988-89 shows the distributions to be very similar. The biomass for the SNA 8 stock in 1988-89 was predicted to be just above the historical low (Davies et al. 1999), dominated by only two year classes and mainly recruitment driven. Interpretation of the age distribution in 1999-2000 may therefore be ambiguous in that the dominance by young age classes indicates two possible scenarios. Either historically high fishing mortality has reduced the relative abundance of older fish, as was observed in 1988-89, or recent year classes have recruited with above average strength. Without a time series ofbiomass estimates to resolve this ambiguity is difficult. A tagging programme to estimate the SNA 8 biomass is to be conducted in 2001-02 and should clarify the uncertainty.

The 1997 year class (3 year olds) appears to be of low strength in the 1999-2000 west coast age distributions. As the growth rate of snapper fiom the west coast is relatively fast in the first few years,

Page 10: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

3 year old age classes that are of above average in recruitment strength will always show in the length frequency distribution, either by broadening the distribution below 30 cm or appearing independently as a strong length mode dominating the 25 to 30 cm size classes (see Davies & Walsh 1995, Walsh et ,

al. 1997, 1999,2000). The 1997 year class has not done this.

The length frequency distributions for the west coast single trawl and pair trawl fisheries were very similar in shape in 1999-2000, indicating similarities in the selectivity patterns between the two methods, although the pair trawl method caught slightly more large fish. Possible reasons for the similarities in selectivity patterns may arise from the 1995 and 1996 year classes containing over 90% of fish in the 30-39 cm length range, which equates to about 65% of the overall catch. As these two year classes make up a large proportion of the fishery and are almost completely selected for by both trawl methods, the selectivity patterns of the methods are likely to be similar. Differences in the selectivity patterns seen between the single trawl and pair trawl methods in the past were evident in catches from the SNA 8 fishery when a higher abundance of larger and older snapper were present.

The Bay of Plenty length distribution in 1999-2000 was relatively similar to that seen in the previous year and has the same mean length of fish caught. The age distribution has broadened slightly with the strong 1995 year class (5 year olds) recruiting into the fishery and containing over 25% of fish caught by longline. The 1995 year class has not yet fully recruited to the fishery. Last year's dominant 1994 year class appears to be fidly recruited, now making up over 20% of the catch. As a result, the abundance of all other year classes in catches has been reduced considerably, although the mean age of the distribution has not changed.

In the Hauraki Gulf age distribution in 1999-2000, relative year class strengths are similar to those seen in previous years. However, the strength of the recruiting 1995 and 1994 year classes (5 and 6 year olds, respectively) has meant that all other year classes have been reduced in dominance. Full recruitment of these two year classes should occur by about age 10. The 1993 and 1992 year classes (7 and 8 year olds, respectively), although not yet fully recruited, continue to be of low strength. The 198 1 year class was the strongest year class to recruit into the Hauraki Gulf over the last 20 years and a very small proportion still remains as 19 year olds, equal in strength to the aggregate (over 19) age class. These two age classes will merge in the following year to boost the aggregate (over 19) age class. The mean age of snapper landed in the Hauraki Gulf longline fishery has increased slightly from the previous year. Relative year class strengths inferred fiom the Hauraki Gulf longline age distribution in 1999-2000, and those of previous years (Davies & Walsh 1995, Walsh et al. 1995, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000), are generally consistent with those predicted fiom the temperature- recruitment relationship and trawl surveys of 1 year old snapper (Francis et al. 1995,1997). However, a difference in the predicted relative strengths of the 1990 and 1991 year classes apparent since 1996- 97, is also evident in 1999-2000. The temperature-recruitment relationship predicts that the 1989 and 1990 year classes are of similar strength and the' 1991 year class is below average. In the 1999-2000 Hauraki Gulf longline age distribution, the 1991 year class is the strongest in the fishery with the 1989 year class being second- or third-strongest in the random age frequency and age-length key approaches respectively. The 1990 year class has continued to be of low average strength over the past four years. Now that these year classes are fully recruited, the differences between the year class strengths inferred fiom the age distributions and those predicted by the temperature-recruitment relationship clearly indicate an anomaly.

The age distribution of snapper fiom the East Northland longline fishery in 1999-2000 was broad and contained a moderate proportion of fish over 19 years of age. The recently recruited 1995 year class dominated the fishery, making up 16% of the longline catch. The 1982 year class (18 year olds) was relatively strong, something unique to the East Northland stock. The 1990 year class was of greater relative strength in East Northland compared to the adjacent Hauraki Gulf and Bay of Plenty stocks.

Page 11: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

The opposite appears true for the 1994 year class. Such differences in year class strength may reflect environmental conditions unique to East Northland and the relatively lower fishing mortality in the stock.

Since 1989-90, broad similarities in relative year class strengths and recruitment patterns have been evident between the SNA 1 stocks, particularly in extremely strong and weak year classes mavies & Walsh 1995, Walsh et al. 1995, 1997, 1998, 1999,2000). The strong 1989 and 1991 year classes are clearly evident in all three stocks of SNA 1, as are the weak 1987, 1992, and 1993 year classes. The strong 1994 year class evident in the Bay of Plenty catch-at-age distribution, and to a lesser degree in the Hauraki Gulf, is of only average strength in East Northland. The 1995 year class appears to be strong in both the Bay of Plenty and East Northland stocks, and is likely to recruit as a stronger year class than 1994 into the Hauraki Gulf over the next few years, delayed somewhat because of slower growth (Davies et al. unpublished data). The 1995 year class is predicted fiom water temperature to be the strongest year class spawned in the Hauraki Gulf since 1989, and is expected to be important in sustaining the SNA 1 fishery (Morrison & Francis 1999). As in previous years, most of the Bay of Plenty length and age samples were collected fiom the western side of the Bay, the area nearest the Hauraki Gulf. Similarities in proportion at age estimates between these two stocks may result fiom the close proximity of the two fishing grounds and the level of mixing that is thought tooccur (Annala & Sullivan 1996). However, some minor differences in year class strengths are evident between these two areas (Gilbert 1999). The 1982 year class and aggregate (over 19) age class appear to be more abundant in the East Northland stock only.

As only two dominant year classes exist in the SNA 8 fishery in 1999-2000, and most of the older year classes have either been fished down, or are relatively less abundant, there are few opportunities to draw comparisons from similarities in recruitment strengths between the SNA 1 and SNA 8 stocks. Based on past years catch-at-age data, any similarities in recruitment strength between the stocks are likely to be due to chance.

Differences were apparent between the analytical and bootstrap solutions for the random age frequency variances of proportion-at-age estimates for snapper in landings sampled from the Hauraki Gulf and East Northland longline fisheries. The bootstrap variances were higher, particularly in the less abundant age classes, i.e., young and old classes. It is possible that this is due to the clustering of fish in bins, which is more apparent for the shorter and longer (hence younger and older) fish. This effect would not be adequately accommodated in the analytical solution for variance that assumes a normal distribution for the mean proportion-at-age between landings. Given the sizes of the random age frequency samples collected fiom these fisheries, the bootstrap solutions most likely provide more accurate variance estimates.

The MWCV (analytical estimates only) for the length and age distributions sampled fiom the SNA 1 and SNA 8 fisheries in 1999-2000 ranged between 0.07 and 0.17.

5. CONCLUSIONS

1. The length and age distributions sampled from the SNA 1 and SNA 8 fisheries in 1999-2000 were generally consistent with trends observed in previous years.

2. A strong 1996 year class has recruited into the SNA 8 stock, decreasing the relative strengths of all other year classes considerably. The 1995 and 1996 year classes make up at least two of every three fish landed by the trawl fishery in 1999-2000.

Page 12: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

3. There were some similarities in the recruitment patterns of the SNA 1 stocks. The East Northland stock recruitment patterns were less similar than those seen between theHauraki Gulf and Bay of Plenty stocks. No similarities in recruitment patterns exist between the SNA 1 and SNA 8 stocks.

4. The strong recruiting 1994 and 1995 year classes now dominate longline catches in the Bay of Plenty stock and are expected to do the same in the Hauraki Gulf over the next few years.

5. A strong 1995 year class has recruited into the East Northland stock. The East Northland stock is the only area in SNA 1 and SNA 8 with a considerable proportion of snapper over 16 years of age.

6. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Dave Fisher, Dave Banks, Kim George, and the stock monitoring team for their prompt and efficient handling and storage of data; Nathan Singleton and Sham Henderson for the collection of market sampling data and the ageing of the otolith data sets; Rob Tasker, Graeme MacKay, and Robert Patira for sampling East Northland landings; Bruce Hartill for ageing the East Northland data set; Helena Cadenhead for helping out at a moments notice; Bernadette McVey (Ministry of Fisheries) for the provision of data from the catch effort return system; and Dave Gilbert for reviewing the report and proposing some usell changes. Funding for this project, SNA199903, was provided by the Ministry of Fisheries.

The following licensed fish receivers, and in particular the people mentioned, are thanked for their cooperation in enabling NIWA staff to sample catches: Hikurangi Fisheries Ltd. (Krkurangi), Ned Yovich; Leigh Fisheries Ltd. (Leigh), Greg Bishop; Moana Pacific Ltd. (Pukekohe), Eddie Dodd and Jenny Tonkin; Ocean Products Columbia Ltd. (whltianga), Dennis Camden; Sanford Ltd. (Auckland). Thanla also to Martin de Beer, Bene Su, and K. Choi for collecting length and age information fiom the west coast single trawl and pair trawl fisheries.

7. REFERENCES

Annala, J.H.; Sullivan, K.J. (Comps.) (1996). Report from the Fishery Assessment Plenary, April May 1996: stock assessments and yield estimates. 308 p. (Unpublished report held in NIWA library, Wellington.)

Davies, N.M.; Gilbert, D.J.; McKenzie, J.R. (1999). Assessment of the SNA 1 and SNA 8 stocks for the 1998-99 fishing year. New Zealand Fisheries Assessment Research Document 99/28. 82 p. (Draft report held in NIWA library, Wellington.)

Davies, N.M.; Walsh, C. (1995). Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings in the Auckland Fishery Management Area 1988-94. New Zealand Fisheries Data Report No. 58. 85 p.

Davies, N.M.; Walsh, C.; Hartill, B. (1993). Estimating catch at age of snapper fiom west coast and Hauraki Gulf fisheries, 1992-93. Northern Fisheries Region Internal Report No. 17. 58 p. (Draft report held by NIWA, Auckland.)

Francis, M.P.; Langley, A.D.; Gilbert, D.J. (1995). Snapper Recruitment in Hauraki Gulf. New Zealand Fisheries Assessment Research Document 95/17. 27 p. (Draft report held in NlWA library, Wellington.)

Francis, M.P.; Langley, A.D.; Gilbert, D.J. (1997). Prediction of snapper ( P a p s auratus) recruitment fiom sea surface temperature. Proceedings of the 2nd World Fisheries Congress Brisbane, Queensland. pp. 67-71.

Page 13: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

I Gilbert, D.J. (1999). Year class strength variability in SNA 1 sub-stocks. New Zealand Fisheries Assessment Research Document 99114.20 p. (Draft report held in NIWA library, Wellington.)

McKenzie, J.; Haddon, M.; Walsh, C.; Carter, S.; Davies, N. (1992). Summary findings of commercial snapper (pagrus aura-) market sampling fiom SNAl & SNA8 (1989-1992). Northern Fisheries Region Internal Report No. 8.63 p. (Draft report held by NiWA, Auckland.)

Momson, M.A.; Francis, M.P. (1999). Trawl survey of snapper and associated species in the Hauraki Gulf, October-November 1997. lMWA Technical Report 58. 37 p.

Momson, M.A.; Parkinson, D.M. (2001). Trawl survey of snapper and associated species off the west coast of the North Island, November 1999 -99 15). W A Technical Report 100.5 1 p.

Paul, L.J. (1976). A study on age, growth, and population structure of the snapper, Chrysophrys auratus (Forster), in the Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand. Fisheries Research Bulletin No. 13. 62 p.

Qsunn II, T.J.; Best, E.A.; Bijsterveld, L.; McGregor, LR. (1983). Sampling Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis) landings for age composition: history, evaluation and estimation.Scientific Report 68, International Pacific Halibut Commission. 56 p.

Southward, G.M. (1976). Sampling landings of halibut for age composition. Scientifc Report 58, International Pacific Halibut Commission. 3 1 p.

Walsh, C.; Hartill, B.; Davies, N.M. (1995). Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings in the Auckland Fishery Management Area, 1994-95. Nav Zealand Fisheries Data Report No. 62. 36 p.

Walsh, C.; Hartill, B.; Davies, N.M. (1997). Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings in the Auckland Fishery Management Area, 1995-96. W A Technical Report 3. 29 p.

Walsh, C.; Hartill, B.; Davies, N.M. (1998). Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings in SNA 1 and SNA 8,1996-97. NIWA Technical Report 24. 30 p.

Walsh, C.; Hartill, B.; Davies, N.M. (1999). Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings in SNA 1 and SNA 8, 1997-98. NIWA Technical Report 54.28 p.

Walsh, C.; Hartill, B.; Davies, N.M. (2000). Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings in SNA 1 and SNA 8, 1998-99. NIWA Technical Report 78. 30 p.

West, I.F. (1978). The use in New Zealand of multilevel clustered sampling designs for the sampling of fish at market for year-class. C.M. 1978/0:5, Statistics Committee, Conseil International pour I 'Exploration de la Mer.

Westrheim, S.J.; Ricker, W.E. (1978). Bias in using an age-length key to estimate age-frequency distributions. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 35: 184-1 89.

Page 14: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

Table 1: Percentage of snapper catch by fishing method* for the stocks in SNA 1 and SNA 8 for the 1999-2000 sampling periodt.

BPT BT BLL DS Other

West coast Bay of Plenty Hauraki Gulf East Northland

* BPT, pair trawl; BT, single trawl; BLL, longline; DS, Danish seine. 1999-2000 represents 01110199 to 29/02/00 only.

Table 2: Summary of the catch (total number and weight of landings) and samples (number of landings and weight sampled, and number of fish measured) in method-season strata for the west coast snapper fisheries from autumn 1999 to summer 1999-2000*.

Method Season

BPT Autumn Winter SP*~ Summer Autumn Winter spring Summer

Number of landings Total Sampled % of total

No. of f ~ h measured

0 0

1 539 10 359

0 0

6 909 5 350

Weight of landings (t) Total Sampled % oftotal

* BPT, pair trawl; BT, single trawl.

Table 3: Summary of the catch (total number and weight of landings) and samples (number of landings and weight sampled, and number of fish measured) in method-season strata for the Bay of Plenty snapper fisheries from autumn 1999 to summer 199%2000*.

Method Season

BLL Autumn Winter spring Summer

BT Autumn Winter spring Summer

DS Autumn Winter spring Summer

Number of landings No. of fish Weight of landings (t) Total Sampled % of total measured Total Sampled % of total

* BLL, longline; BT, single trawl; DS, Danish seine.

Page 15: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

Table 4: Summary of the catch (total number and weight of landings) and samples (number of landings and weight sampled, and number of fish measured) in method-season strata for the Hauraki Gulf snapper fisheries from autumn 1999 to summer 1999-2000+.

Method Season

BLL Autumn Winter spring Summer

BT Autumn Winter spring Summer Autumn Winter spring Summer

Number of landings No. of fsh Weight of landings (t) Total Sampled % of total measured Total Sampled % of total

* BLL, longline; BT, single trawl; DS, Danish seine.

Table 5: Summary of the catch (total number and weight of landings) and samples (number of landings and weight sampled, and number of fish measured) in method-season strata for the East Northland snapper fishery from autumn 1999 to summer 1999-2000+.

Method Season Number of landings No. of fish Weight of landings (t)

Total Sampled % of total measured Total Sampled % of total

BLL Autumn 720 0 0 0 159 0 0 Winter 823 0 0 0 182 0 0 spring 765 24 3.1 5 026 2 14 11 5.1 Summer 780 24 3.1 5 101 2 14 12 5.6

* BLL, longline.

Table 6: Details of snapper otolith samples collected in 1999-2000 from the stocks in SNA 1 and SNA 8*.

Area Fishing method Sampling period Sample method tt Length range (cm) No. aged

WCNI BPT,BT, RT Spring, summer SR BPLE BLL, DS Spring, summer SR HAGU BLL Spring, summer R ENLD BLL Spring, summer R

* WCNI, west coast North Island; BPLE, Bay of Plenty; HAGU, Hauraki GulS ENLD, East Northland. ' BPT, pair trawl; BT, single trawl; RT, research hawk BLL, longline; DS, Danish seine. tt SR, stratified random sample; R, random sample.

Page 16: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

Figure 1: Quota management areas for the east and west coast North Island snapper stocks (SNA 1 and SNA 8 respectively) and the range of the three SNA 1 substocks, East Northland, Hauraki Gulf, and Bay of Plenty.

Page 17: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

Mean = 36.3 cm n = 12 259 MWCV = 0.08

38 41 44 47 50 53 56 59 62 65 68 71 74 77 80 Fork length (cm)

Figure 2: Proportion at length distribution (histogram) and c.vs (solid line) determined from snapper landings sam- pled from the west coast single trawl fishery in 1999-2000 (n denotes length sample size, MWCV denotes mean weighted cv.).

Mean = 5.3 years n = 517 MWCV = 0.10

Age (years)

Figure 3: Proportion at age distribution (histogram) and c.vs (solid line) determined from snapper landings sampled from the west coast single trawl fishery in 1999-2000 using the age-length key approach (n denotes otolith sample size, MWCV denotes mean weighted cv.).

Page 18: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

Mean = 37.8 cm n = I 1 898 MWCV = 0.07

32 35 38 41 44 47 50 53 56 59 62 65 68 71 74 77 80

Fork length (cm)

Figure 4: Proportion at length distribution @istogram) and c.vs (solid line) determined from snapper landings sam- pled from the west coast pair trawl fishery in 1999-2000 (n denotes length sample size, MWCV denotes mean weighted w.).

Mean = 5.7 years n = 517 MWCV = 0.1 1

7 10 13 16 19 Age (years)

Figure 5: Proportion at age distribution (histogram) and c.vs (solid line) determined from snapper landings sampled from the west coast pair trawl fishery in 1999-2000 using the agelength key approach (n denotes otolith sample size, MWCV denotes mean weighted c.v.).

Page 19: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

Mean = 33.8 cm n = 5 093

Fork length (cm)

Figure 6: Proportion at length distribution (histogram) and c.v.s (solid line) determined from snapper landings sam- pled from the Bay of Plenty longline fishery in 1999-2000 (n denotes length sample sue, MWCV denotes mean weighted cv.).

7 10 13 16 19

Age (years)

Mean = 7.3 years n = 291 MWCV = 0.16

Figure 7: Proportion at age distribution @istogram) and c.va (solid line) determined from snapper landings sampled from the Bay of Plenty longline fishery in 1999-2000 using the age-length key approach (n denotes otolith sample size, MWCV denotes mean weighted c.v.).

Page 20: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

Mean = 34.9 crn n=9717 MWCV =,0.10

Fork length (cm)

Figure 8: Proportion at length distribution (histogram) and c.vs (solid line) determined from snapper landings sam- pled from the Hauraki Gulf longline fishery in 1999-2000 (n denotes length sample size, MWCV denotes mean weighted c.v., graph excludes a single observation at 82 cm).

Mean = 9.3 years n = I 007 MWCV (an.) = 0.10

1991

. . . . . 1 4 7 10 13 16 1 9

Mean = 9.6 years

I 4 7 10 13 16 1 9 Age (years)

Figure 9: Proportion at age distributions (histogram) and c.v.s (solid and dashed lines represent analytical and bootstrap estimates respectively) determined from snapper landings sampled from the Hauraki Gulf longline fishery in 1999-2000 using (a) the age-length key and @) the random age frequency approaches (n denotes otolith sample size, MWCVdenotes mean weighted C.V. calculated wing analytical, an., and bootstrap, bt. cvs).

Page 21: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

Mean = 34.6 cm n = 10 127 MWCV=O.ll

Fork length (cm)

Figure 10: Proportion at length distribution (histogram) and c.vs (solid line) determined from snapper landings sampled from the East Northland longline fishery in 1999-2000 (n denotes length sample size, MWCV denotes mean weighted c.v., graph excludes a single observation at 84 em).

Mean = 9.3 years n = 1 005 MWCV (an.) = 0.1 t

- Mean = 9.3 years

1.2 5 n = 1 005 MWCV (an.) = 0.1 7 MWCV @t) = 0.22

Age (years)

Figure 11: Proportion at age distributions (histogram) and c.v.s (solid and dashed lines represent analytical and bootstrap estimates respectively) determined from snapper landings sampled from the East Northland longline fishery in 1999-2000 using (a) the age-length key and (b) the random age frequency approaches (n denotes otolith sample size, MWCV denotes mean weighted C.V. calculated using analytical, an, and bootstrap, bt. LVS).

Page 22: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

Appendix 1: Estimated seasonal proportion at length and c.vs for snapper fisheries in SNA 1 and SNA 8 in 1999-2000 P. i. = proportion of fish in length class. Nt = total number of fsh caught. C.V. = coefficient of variation. n = total number of fish sampled.

Estimates of the proportion at length of snapper from the west coast single trawl and pair trawl fisheries in 1999-2000

Length

(cm)

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3 1 32 33 34 3 5 3 6 37 3 8 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 5 1 52 53 54 5 5 5 6 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80

Nt

n

Summer P.i. C.V.

0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0013 0.39 0.0026 0.48 0.0092 0.23 0.0210 0.21 0.0361 0.14 0.0509 0.12 0.0895 0.09 0.1063 0.08 0.1074 0.06 0.0786 0.07 0.0575 0.07 0.0488 0.08 0.0414 0.14 0.0355 0.10 0.0322 0.08 0.0273 0.15 0.0233 0.22 0.0206 0.19 0.0236 0.14 0.0202 0.20 0.0161 0.09 0.0179 0.20 0.0159 0.17 0.0140 0.17 0.0098 0.13 0.0117 0.20 0.0080 0.26 0.0082 0.16 0.0068 0.35 0.0081 0.29 0.0066 0.40 0.0073 0.26 0.0060 0.36 0.0053 0.33 0.0055 0.21 0.0041 0.35 0.0028 0.45 0.0026 0.32 0.0021 0.40 0.0024 0.42 0.0005 0.95 0.0010 0.41 0.0011 0.47 0.0013 0.66 0.0002 0.97 0.0005 0.77 0.0006 0.66 0.0000 0.00 0.0002 0.99 0.0000 0.00 0.0002 0.97 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00 0.0000 0.00

238 090

5 350

Single trawl Spr-sum

- lmmer

C.V.

0.00 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.27 0.15 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.08 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.10 0.08 0.11 0.06 0.11 0.07 0.11 0.13 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.12 0.16 0.18 0.16 0.12 0.15 0.14 0.16 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.13 0.34 0.28 0.3 1 0.24 0.34 0.45 0.39 0.53 0.77 0.52 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00

Pair trawl

Page 23: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

Appendix 1 - continued: Estimates of the proportion at length of snapper from the Bay of Plenty longline fishery in 1999-2000

Length

(cm)

20 2 1 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3 1 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 4 1 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 5 1 52 53 54 55 56 57 5 8 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80

Nt

n

Longline mmer - Spr-sum

C.V. P.i. C.V.

Page 24: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

Appendix 1 - continued: Estimates of the proportion at length of snapper from the Hauraki Gulf longline fishery in 1999-2000

Spring - C.V.

0.00 0.00 1.03 0.97 0.50 0.44 0.32 0.16 0.13 0.14 0.13 0.08 0.05 0.09 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.09 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.18 0.16 0.21 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.19 0.33 0.32 0.30 0.44 0.37 0.38 0.26 0.30 0.75 0.28 0.34 0.28 0.51 0.52 0.4 I 0.57 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.00 1.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

- mmer -

C.V.

0.00 0.93 0.00 0.46 0.41 0.37 0.3 1 0.19 0.14 0.10 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.10 0.12 0.1 1 0.12 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.2 1 0.16 0.22 0.28 0.17 0.23 0.29 0.26 0.29 0.3 1 0.29 0.26 0.3 1 0.28 0.35 0.48 0.45 0.70 0.59 0.38 0.55 0.52 0.00 0.50 0.97 0.73 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 .oo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 .oo 0.00 0.00

Longline SD~-sum

Page 25: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

Appendix 1 - continued: Estimates of the proportion at length of snapper from the East Northland longline fishery in 1999-2000

Spring P.i. C.V.

Summer P.i. C.V.

Page 26: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

Appendix 2: Estimated seasonal proportion at age and c.v.s for snapper fisheries in SNA 1 and SNA 8 in 1999-2000 P j . = proportion of fish in age class, C.V. = coefficient of variation.

Estimates of proportion at age of snapper from the west coast single trawl and pair trawl fisheries in 1999-2000 Otolith sample size = 5 17

Age-length key Single trawl

Age spring Summer Spr-sum (years) P j . C.V. P . C.V. P j . C.V.

Age-length key Pair trawl - - - - . . -

spring Summer Spr-sum P j . C.V. P . C.V. P.j. C.V.

Estimates of proportion at age of snapper from the Bay of Plenty longline fishery in 1999-2000 Otolith sample size = 29 1

Age-length key Longline - "

Age spring Summer Spr-sum (years) P j . C.V. P.j. C.V. P j . C.V.

Page 27: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

Appendix 2 - continued: Estimates of proportion at age with coefficients of variation (analytical & bootstrap estimates, C.V. (an) & C.V. (bt) respectively), for snapper from the Hauraki Gulf longline fishery in 1999-2000 Otolith sample size = 1 007

Age-length key Random age frequency Longline - LO&&

Age spring Summer Spr-sum Spr-sum (years) P.j. C.V. PJ. C.V. P.j. C.V. . C.V. (an) C.V. &J

Estimates of propotion at age with coefficients of variation (analytical & bootstrap estimates, C.V. (an.) & C.V. (bi) respectively), for snapper from the East Northland longline fishery in 1999-2000 Otolith sample size = 1 005

Age-length key Random age frequency L a - -- -

spring Summer Spr-sum Spr-sum P.j. C.V. PJ. C.V. PJ. C.V. P.j. C.V. (an) C.V. (bt)

Page 28: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

Appendix 3: Estimated mean weight at age (kg) and c.v.s for snapper fisheries in SNA 1 and SNA 8 in 1999-2000 C.V. = coefficient of variation.

Estimates of mean weight at age (kg) of snapper from the west coast single trawl and pair trawl fisheries in 1999- Otolith sample size = 5 17

Single trawl Pair trawl - -

Age spring Summer Spr-sum spring Summer Spr-sum (years) Mean C.V. Mean C.V. Mean C.V. Mean C.V. Mean C.V. Mean C.V.

Estimates of mean weight at age (kg) of snapper from the Bay of Plenty longline fishery in 1999-2000 Otolith sample size = 291 .

spring Summer Spr-sum Mean C.V. Mean C.V. Mean C.V. n

Page 29: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

Appendix 3 - continued: Estimates of mean weight at age (kg) of snapper from the Hauraki Gulf longline fishery in 1999-2000 Otolith sample size = 1 007

SP*~ Summer Spr-sum Mean C.V. Mean C.V. Mean C.V.

Estimates of mean weight at age (kg) of snapper from the East Northland longline fishery in 1999-2000 Otolith sample size = 1 005

SP*~ Summer Spr-sum Mean C.V. Mean C.V. Mean C.V.

Page 30: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

Appendix 4: Age-length keys derived from otoIith samples coIIected from snapper fisheries in SNA 1 and SNA 8 in 1999-2000

Estimates of proportion of length at age for snapper sampled from the west coast, spring and summer 1999-2000 (Note: Aged to 01/01/2000)

Length Age (years) No. (cm) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19>19aged

Total 517

Page 31: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

Appendix 4 - continued: Estimates of proportion of length at age for snapper sampled from the Bay of Plenty, spring and summer 1999-2000 (Note: Aged to 0110112000)

Length Age (years) No. (cm) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 >19aged

Total 29 1 I

Page 32: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

Appendix 4 - continued: Estimates of proportion of length at age for snapper sampled from the Bauraki Gulf, spring and summer 1999-2000 (Note: Aged to 01/0112000)

Length Age (years) No. (cm) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 >19aged

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.080.500.080.25 00.08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.100.350.250.050.050.15 00.05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.05 0.33 0.31 0.12 0.10 0.07 0 0 0.02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.020.180.320.110.040.180.090.050.02 00.02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 0.32 0.28 0.03 0.07 0.13 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.20 0.25 0.100.10 0.23 0.05 0.03 0.03 0 0.03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 0.09 0.31 0.04 0.15 0.21 0.09 0.04 0.03 0.01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.080.180-060.140.300.120.040.04 00.020.02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.020.070.190.140.070.230.11 0.050.02 00.050.05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.040.070.160.070.290.090.110.130.020.02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.06 0.08 0.03 0.08 0.360.10 0.18 0.060.03 0.03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.050.050.090.200.090.340.07 00.07 00.02 0 00.02 0 0 0 0 0 00.080.080.130.340.110.180.05 0 0 00.03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.18 0.10 0.22 0.10 0.06 0.10 0.06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.05 0.30 0.11 0.20 0.20 0 0.07 0 0.05 0 0 0.02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.03 0.21 0.07 0.31 0.14 0.07 0.07 0.10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.140.11 0.11 0.360.11 0.040.040.070.04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.040.21 0.320.18 00.040.11 0.04 0 00.040.04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.13 0.29 0.21 0 0.04 0.04 0 0 0 0 0.04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.05 0.10 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.05 0.05 0 0 0 0.10 0.05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.080.380.15 00.23 00.15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.14 00.14 0 00.140.43 0 0 00.14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.11 00.110.22 00.22 0 0 0 00.220.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.140.140.140.070.360.07 00.07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.09 0 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.17 0 0.17 0.17 0 0 0 0 0.33 0.17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.20 0 0.20 0 0 0.40 0.20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.25 0 0 0.17 0.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.17 00.67 0 0 0 00.17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.20 0 0.20 0 0.20 0 0 0 0.20 0.20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.400.20 0 0 0 00.200.20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.50 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.20 0 00.400.40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.50 00.50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.20 0 00.200.60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.330.33 00.33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 1 007

Page 33: Length and age composition of commercial snapper landings ...docs.niwa.co.nz/library/public/FAR2001_52.pdf · Length frequency samples were collected from the SNA 1 longline fisheries

Appendix 4 - continued: Estimates of proportion of length at age for snapper sampled from East Northland, spring and summer 1999-2000 (Note: Aged to 01/01/2000)

Length Age (years) No. (an) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 >19aged

Total