legend and boring logs appended to this report. 3. ... soil samples screened in the ... s = split...

Appendix 1 Figures

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

Horizontal Scale (feet)

Vertical Exaggeration: 2x

A A'

Notes:1. Data concerning the various strata have been interpreted at boring locations only. The stratigraphy between

borings may vary from that shown.2. Refer to plan view for subsurface profile location. For strata details and symbol legend, see Subsurface

Profile Legend and boring logs appended to this report.3. Numbers displayed beside boring(s) represent SPT "N" values and PID readings corresponding to their

respective sampling interval. Where coring was performed, numbers represent Recovery and RQD values.4. Soil Samples screened in the field using a Thermal Environmental Systems Model 580S Photoionization

Detector. The Meter was calibrated relative to a benzene in air standard. N.D. = None Detected.

ELE

VA

TIO

N (

feet

)

DISTANCE ALONG PROFILE (feet)

SUBSURFACE PROFILE A-A'

File No.: 0331-014.01 Figure No.: 3Reviewed By: MGBDrawn By: DSF

Geotechnical | Construction | EnvironmentalEngineers & Scientists

984 Southford Road - Middlebury, Connecticut 06762Telephone: 203.758.8836 Fax: 203.758.8842

GE

O S

TA

ND

AR

D P

ID 1

1 X

17

(2/2

5/0

4)

BO

RIN

G L

OG

S.G

PJ

FB

NW

NL0

1.G

DT

5/1

9/10

200

20

17

40

71

59

119

100/5"

B-01-4Blow Count

19

17

20

13

9

27

93

145

64

66

58

90

87

B-01-6Blow Count

25

36

58

87/6"

74

31

45

48

100/2"

76

32

74

93

47

21

20

45

89

Date: 8/3/2010

Retaining Wall 101 at Broad StreetNew Britain - Hartford Busway

State Project No. 63-H137

RW-101-02

7

Blow Count

8

5

32

53Blow Count

RW-101-01

[REC= 98%; RQD= 65%]

[REC= 97%; RQD= 83%]

[REC= 97%; RQD= 63%]

[REC= 95%; RQD= 82%]

[REC= 90%; RQD= 20%]

[REC= 81%; RQD= 17%]

[REC= 100%; RQD= 58%]

? ?

GLACIAL TILL

BEDROCK

SILT

TOP OF FOOTING

RW101

BOTTOM OF FOOTINGAT EL. 60 FT.

BOTTOM OF PADAT EL. 59 FT.

FILL

BOTTOM OF PADAT EL. 56 FT.

BOTTOM OF FOOTINGAT EL. 57 FT.

Factored Bearing Resistance vs. Effective Footing Width

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0

Effective Footing Width (ft)

Fac

tore

d B

eari

ng

Res

ista

nce

(ks

f)

2-in Settlement (service Limit)1-in Settlement (service Limit)1/2-in Settlement (service Limit)1/4-in Settlement (service Limit)Strength Limit State

Busway North - Retaining Wall 101GeoDesign File No. 0331-014.01

Figure 5 - Factored Bearing Resistances

Appendix 2 2010 Boring Logs (RW-101-Series)

PavementFill

Silt

Glacial Till

14 24 29 20

13 15 17 14

4 3 2 2

4 4 4 5

7 11 14 20

10 16 20 24

45 `56 58 65

53 87/6"

24 26 48 59

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

12

24

12

15

16

18

24

22

15

9

0

S-1

S-2

S-3

S-4

S-5

S-6

S-7

S-8

S-9

Very dense,Top 6": red brown fine to medium SAND, littlefine Gravel, little SiltBottom 6": gray brown fine to coarse GRAVEL,little fine to coarse Sand, trace SiltDense, black ASH and CINDERS, trace fine tomedium Sand, trace Silt

Loose, black ASH and CINDERS, trace fineSand

Loose, red brown SILT and fine to coarse SAND,little fine to coarse Gravel, trace Brick fragments

Medium dense, red brown SILT, little fine Sand

Dense, red brown SILT, some fine to coarseSand, little fine Gravel

Very dense, red brown SILT and fine to coarseSAND, trace fine Gravel

Very dense, red brown fine to coarse SAND andSILT, little fine to coarse Gravel

Very dense, no recovery

Bridge No.:

Route No.:

Fall: 30 in.Hammer Wt.: 300 lb. Hammer Wt.: 140 lb.

No. ofCore Runs: 2

RQ

D %

Casing Size/Type: 4-in ID/HW

Total Penetration in

Hole No.: RW-101-01

Sheet1 of 2

No. ofSoil Samples: 12

Fall: 30in.

Sampler Type/Size: SS/1.375-in ID

Groundwater Observations: @9 ft. after 0 hours

Gen

eral

ized

Str

ata

Des

crip

tion

Dep

th (

ft)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

SAMPLES

Inspector: Robert Marshall

Finish Date: 5-11-10

Connecticut DOT Boring Report

Blows onSampler

per 6 inches

Core Barrel Type: NX

Rock: 5ft

Sample Type: S = Split Spoon C = Core UP = Undisturbed Piston V = Vane Shear Test

Proportions Used: Trace = 1 - 10%, Little = 10 - 20%, Some = 20 - 35%, And = 35 - 50%

Surface Elevation: 66.3

SM-001-M REV. 1/02

Pen

. (in

.)

Rec

. (in

.)

Ele

vatio

n (f

t)

65

60

55

50

45

40

Earth: 46.5ft

Stat./Offset:

Sam

ple

Typ

e/N

o.

Project No.: 63-H137

Town: Hartford

NOTES: Top 10 inches consisted of 4 inches asphalt over 6 inches concrete. Pilot hole to10 ft. with 4-in ID solid augers then switched to 4-in flush joint casing.Boring performed 27 feet south of B-01-06 drilled on 10/09/2008.Roller bit refusal at 38 and 46 feet below grade.

Material Descriptionand Notes

Project Description: New Britain - Hartford Busway

Northing: 839638.113

Easting: 1017344.038

Engineer: GeoDesign, Inc.

Start Date: 5-10-10

20

Glacial Till(con't)

CobbleGlacial Till

Bedrock

15 16 15 21

14 17 28 31

55 16 32 42

24

24

60

18

60

3

16

18

18

54

S-10

S-11

C-1

S-12

C-2

Dense, red brown fine to medium SAND andSILT, little fine to coarse Gravel


COBBLE / GLACIAL TILLCoring Time (min./ft.): 6, 4, 3, 3, 3


Very Poor Quality, Moderately Hard, SlightlyWeathered, gray, SILTSTONECoring Time (min./ft.): 6, 7, 6, 3, 4

END OF BORING 51.5ft

Bridge No.:

Route No.:


No. ofCore Runs: 2

RQ

D %



Hole No.: RW-101-01

Sheet2 of 2


Fall: 30in.



Gen

eral

ized

Str

ata

Des

crip

tion

Dep

th (

ft)

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

SAMPLES




Blows onSampler

per 6 inches


Rock: 5ft




SM-001-M REV. 1/02

Pen

. (in

.)

Rec

. (in

.)

Ele

vatio

n (f

t)

35

30

25

20

15

10

Earth: 46.5ft

Stat./Offset:

Sam

ple

Typ

e/N

o.


Town: Hartford

NOTES: Top 10 inches consisted of 4 inches asphalt over 6 inches concrete. Pilot hole to10 ft. with 4-in ID solid augers then switched to 4-in flush joint casing.Boring performed 27 feet south of B-01-06 drilled on 10/09/2008.Roller bit refusal at 38 and 46 feet below grade.




Easting: 1017344.038


Start Date: 5-10-10

PavementFill

Glacial Till

Boulder

Glacial Till

31 100/2"

1 2 5 11

16 31 45

9 9 23 36

24 29 45 30/1"

16 39 54 53

54 32 15 17

9 9 12 25

8

24

18

24

19

24

24

24

2

20

18

22

18

18

8

10

S-1

S-2

S-3

S-4

S-5

S-6

S-7

S-8

Very dense, gray fine to medium SAND, little Silt,trace Asphalt fragments

Loose, dark gray SILT, little fine Sand, traceBrick fragments, trace OrganicsVery dense, red brown SILT, some fine to coarseSand, some fine to coarse Gravel, trace Brickfragments

Dense, red brown SILT, trace fine to mediumSand

Very dense, red brown SILT, some fine to coarseSAND, little fine to coarse Gravel

Very dense, red brown fine to coarse SAND,some Silt, little fine Gravel

Dense, red brown fine to coarse SAND, someSilt, some fine to coarse Gravel

Medium dense, red brown fine to coarse SANDand CLAYEY SILT, some fine Gravel

Bridge No.:

Route No.:


No. ofCore Runs: 2

RQ

D %



Hole No.: RW-101-02

Sheet1 of 2


Fall: 30in.



Gen

eral

ized

Str

ata

Des

crip

tion

Dep

th (

ft)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

SAMPLES




Blows onSampler

per 6 inches


Rock: 9ft




SM-001-M REV. 1/02

Pen

. (in

.)

Rec

. (in

.)

Ele

vatio

n (f

t)

60

55

50

45

40

35

Earth: 42.5ft

Stat./Offset:

Sam

ple

Typ

e/N

o.


Town: Hartford

NOTES: Top 10 inches consisted of 4 inches asphalt over 6 inches concrete. Wet sampleat 10 feet below grade.Pilot hole to 10 feet with 4-in OD solid augers then switched to 4-in casing.Roller bit through boulder 13.6 to 15 feet below grade. Telescoped 3-in casing below 4-incasing refusal at 13.5 feet.




Easting: 1017330.076


Start Date: 5-11-10

17

58

Glacial Till(con't)

Bedrock

7 9 11 20

12 19 26 34

18 39 50 50/3"

24

24

21

48

60

24

24

20

39

60

S-9

S-10

S-11

C-1

C-2

Medium dense, red brown fine to coarse SANDand CLAYEY SILT, some fine Gravel

Dense, red brown fine to coarse SAND, someClayey Silt, little fine Gravel

Very dense, red brown fine to coarse SAND,some Clayey Silt, little fine Gravel

Very Poor Quality, Moderately Hard, ModeratelyWeathered, gray, SILTSTONECoring Time (min./ft.): 3, 2, 3, 5

Fair Quality, Moderately Hard, SlightlyWeathered, gray, SILTSTONECoring Time (min./ft.): 3, 3, 2, 2, 4

END OF BORING 51.5ft

Bridge No.:

Route No.:


No. ofCore Runs: 2

RQ

D %



Hole No.: RW-101-02

Sheet2 of 2


Fall: 30in.



Gen

eral

ized

Str

ata

Des

crip

tion

Dep

th (

ft)

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

SAMPLES




Blows onSampler

per 6 inches


Rock: 9ft




SM-001-M REV. 1/02

Pen

. (in

.)

Rec

. (in

.)

Ele

vatio

n (f

t)

30

25

20

15

10

5

Earth: 42.5ft

Stat./Offset:

Sam

ple

Typ

e/N

o.


Town: Hartford

NOTES: Top 10 inches consisted of 4 inches asphalt over 6 inches concrete. Wet sampleat 10 feet below grade.Pilot hole to 10 feet with 4-in OD solid augers then switched to 4-in casing.Roller bit through boulder 13.6 to 15 feet below grade. Telescoped 3-in casing below 4-incasing refusal at 13.5 feet.




Easting: 1017330.076


Start Date: 5-11-10

Appendix 3 2010 Geotechnical Laboratory Testing

GRAVEL SAND

COBBLES SILT OR CLAYCOARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE

GRADATION TESTBusway North: RW-101 BURMISTER SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

TEST NO. MATERIAL SOURCE DESCRIPTION

BORING NO. RW-101-01

SAMPLE NO. S-4

DEPTH 7-9 ft 1 of 5 Jar Sample SILT and fineto coarse SAND, little fine to coarse Gravel

TECH. RJM

REVIEWER MGB

DATE 05/24/10

FILE NO. 331-14.1

U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0.0010.010.1110100

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

PE

RC

EN

T F

INE

R B

Y W

EIG

HT

1 1/2" No. 200No. 100No.60No.40 3" No. 10No. 41/2" 3/4" 1" 2"

GRAVEL SAND





SAMPLE NO. S-6

DEPTH 12-14 ft 2 of 5 Jar Sample SILT, some fine to coarse Sand, little fine Gravel

TECH. RJM

REVIEWER MGB

DATE 05/24/10

FILE NO. 331-14.1


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0.0010.010.1110100


PE

RC

EN

T F

INE

R B

Y W

EIG

HT

1 1/2" No. 200No. 100No.60No.40 3" No. 10No. 41/2" 3/4" 1" 2"

GRAVEL SAND





SAMPLE NO. S-3

DEPTH 7-8.5 ft 3 of 5 Jar Sample SILT, some fine to coarse Gravel, some fine to coarse Sand

TECH. RJM

REVIEWER MGB

DATE 05/24/10

FILE NO. 331-14.1


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0.0010.010.1110100


PE

RC

EN

T F

INE

R B

Y W

EIG

HT

1 1/2" No. 200No. 100No.60No.40 3" No. 10No. 41/2" 3/4" 1" 2"

GRAVEL SAND





SAMPLE NO. S-5

DEPTH 12-13.6 ft 4 of 5 Jar Sample SILT, some fine to coarse Sand, little fine to coarse Gravel

TECH. RJM

REVIEWER MGB

DATE 05/24/10

FILE NO. 331-14.1


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0.0010.010.1110100


PE

RC

EN

T F

INE

R B

Y W

EIG

HT

1 1/2" No. 200No. 100No.60No.40 3" No. 10No. 41/2" 3/4" 1" 2"

GRAVEL SAND





SAMPLE NO. S-7

DEPTH 20-22 ft 5 of 5 Jar Sample fine to coarse SAND, some Silt, some fine to coarse Gravel

TECH. RJM

REVIEWER MGB

DATE 05/24/10

FILE NO. 331-14.1


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0.0010.010.1110100


PE

RC

EN

T F

INE

R B

Y W

EIG

HT

1 1/2" No. 200No. 100No.60No.40 3" No. 10No. 41/2" 3/4" 1" 2"

Appendix 4 2008 Boring Logs

(B-Series)

CrushedStoneFill

Glacial Till

Top 8": Medium dense, gray fine to coarseGRAVELBottom 7": Medium dense, gray fine to coarseSAND and SILT, (moist)Top 12": Medium dense, brown fine to coarseSAND, trace Silt, (wet)Bottom 7": Medium dense, red brown Clayey SILT,some fine to coarse Sand, (wet)

Dense, red brown Clayey SILT, some fine tocoarse Sand, little fine to coarse Gravel, (wet)

Very dense, red brown Clayey SILT, some fine tocoarse Sand, little fine to coarse Gravel, (wet)



6 11 9 10

3 9 8 8

13 15 25 35

21 33 38 44

16 24 35 38

14 19 100

24

24

24

24

24

18

15

19

18

20

14

10

S-1

S-2

S-3

S-4

S-5

S-6

No. ofCore Runs: 2

RQ

D %

Start Date: 9-25-08

Casing Size/Type: 4"/HW


Hole No.: B-01-4

Sheet1 of 2


Fall: 24"

Sampler Type/Size: SS / 1 3/8"

Groundwater Observations: @3' during drilling

Gen

eral

ized

Str

ata

Des

crip

tion

Dep

th (

ft)

0

5

10

15

20

25

SAMPLES



Blows onSampler

per 6 inches

Core Barrel Type: NQ


Rock: 10ft



Easting: 1017360.9Surface Elevation: 46.8

SM-001-M REV. 1/02

Pen

. (in

.)

Rec

. (in

.)

Ele

vatio

n (f

t)

45

40

35

30

25

Earth: 30ft

Stat./Offset:

Project Description: New Britain / Hartford Busway -

Sam

ple

Typ

e/N

o.

Town: Hartford

Project No.: 63-H137 / 0331-014.0

Finish Date: 9-25-08 Bridge No.:

Route No.:

Inspector: Garry Jacobson

NOTES: Used solid stem augers to 10'. Drove casing to 20', then open hole.

Fall: 30"Hammer Wt.: 300 lbs. Hammer Wt.: 140 lbs.

Northing: 839728.0

65

83

Glacial Till(con't)

Bedrock


Fair, Moderately Hard, Slightly Weathered, gray,aphanitic SILTSTONE. Bedding is massive.Primary joints horizontal, 2" to 18" spacing.Several high angle secondary joints are rough,carved.Coring time (min./ ft.): 7, 7, 7, 8, 8

Fair, Moderately Hard, Slightly Weathered, gray,aphanitic SILTSTONE. Bedding is massive.Primary joint spacing is 2" to 24" and nosecondary joints.Coring time (min./ ft.): 8, 8, 8, 9, 9

END OF BORING 40ft

100/5" 5

60

60

4

59

58

S-7

C-1

C-2

No. ofCore Runs: 2

RQ

D %

Start Date: 9-25-08

Casing Size/Type: 4"/HW


Hole No.: B-01-4

Sheet2 of 2


Fall: 24"


Groundwater Observations: @3' during drilling

Gen

eral

ized

Str

ata

Des

crip

tion

Dep

th (

ft)

25

30

35

40

45

50

SAMPLES



Blows onSampler

per 6 inches



Rock: 10ft




SM-001-M REV. 1/02

Pen

. (in

.)

Rec

. (in

.)

Ele

vatio

n (f

t)

20

15

10

5

0

Earth: 30ft

Stat./Offset:


Sam

ple

Typ

e/N

o.

Town: Hartford

Project No.: 63-H137 / 0331-014.0


Route No.:

Inspector: Garry Jacobson

NOTES: Used solid stem augers to 10'. Drove casing to 20', then open hole.


Northing: 839728.0

Pavement

Fill

Glacial Till

6" of ASPHALT over 6" GRAVEL Base

Medium dense, brown to red brown fine tomedium SAND, little fine to coarse Gravel, little Silt

Medium dense, brown fine to medium SAND, littlefine to coarse Gravel, little Silt, little Ash/ Cinders

Medium dense, red brown fine to medium SAND,little fine to coarse Gravel, little Silt

Medium dense, no recovery

Loose, red brown SILT, little fine to medium Sand,little fine Gravel, (wet)

Medium dense, red brown fine to medium SAND,some Silt, little fine Gravel

Very dense, red brown fine to medium SAND,some Silt, little fine Gravel

Very dense, red brown fine to medium SAND,some fine to coarse Gravel, some Silt

10 10 9 8

7 8 9 11

15 11 9 8

8 7 6 7

9 5 4 7

9 11 16 17

21 44 49 57

47 60 85

24

24

24

24

24

24

24

18

12

8

12

0

12

16

13

16

S-1

S-2

S-3

S-4

S-5

S-6

S-7

S-8

No. ofCore Runs: 2

RQ

D %

Start Date: 10-9-08

Casing Size/Type: 3"/NW


Hole No.: B-01-6

Sheet1 of 3


Fall: 24"


Groundwater Observations: @10' after 0 hrs.

Gen

eral

ized

Str

ata

Des

crip

tion

Dep

th (

ft)

0

5

10

15

20

25

SAMPLES



Blows onSampler

per 6 inches



Rock: 10ft




SM-001-M REV. 1/02

Pen

. (in

.)

Rec

. (in

.)

Ele

vatio

n (f

t)

65

60

55

50

45

Earth: 50ft

Stat./Offset:


Sam

ple

Typ

e/N

o.

Town: Hartford

Project No.: 63-H137 / 0331-014.0


Route No.:


NOTES: Pilot hole to 5' with 4" OD SSA. Wet sample at 10'. Open hole below 30'.


Northing: 839663.9

Glacial Till(con't)

Bedrock



Very dense, red brown fine to medium SAND,some Silt, little fine to coarse Gravel

Very dense, red brown fine to medium SAND,some Silt, trace fine Gravel

Very dense, red brown fine to medium SAND,some Silt, trace fine Gravel

20 28 36 45

17 31 35 80

16 26 32 49

49 90

18 27 60 59

24

24

24

12

24

12

12

18

8

16

S-9

S-10

S-11

S-12

S-13

No. ofCore Runs: 2

RQ

D %

Start Date: 10-9-08



Hole No.: B-01-6

Sheet2 of 3


Fall: 24"



Gen

eral

ized

Str

ata

Des

crip

tion

Dep

th (

ft)

25

30

35

40

45

50

SAMPLES



Blows onSampler

per 6 inches



Rock: 10ft




SM-001-M REV. 1/02

Pen

. (in

.)

Rec

. (in

.)

Ele

vatio

n (f

t)

40

35

30

25

20

Earth: 50ft

Stat./Offset:


Sam

ple

Typ

e/N

o.

Town: Hartford

Project No.: 63-H137 / 0331-014.0


Route No.:




Northing: 839663.9

63

82

Bedrock(con't)

Fair, Moderately Hard, Fresh, gray, SILTSTONECoring time (min./ft.): 6, 6, 6, 6, 6

Good, Moderately Hard, Fresh, gray, SILTSTONECoring time (min./ft.): 6, 5, 6, 5, 5

END OF BORING 60ft

60

60

58

57

C-1

C-2

No. ofCore Runs: 2

RQ

D %

Start Date: 10-9-08



Hole No.: B-01-6

Sheet3 of 3


Fall: 24"



Gen

eral

ized

Str

ata

Des

crip

tion

Dep

th (

ft)

50

55

60

65

70

75

SAMPLES



Blows onSampler

per 6 inches



Rock: 10ft




SM-001-M REV. 1/02

Pen

. (in

.)

Rec

. (in

.)

Ele

vatio

n (f

t)

15

10

5

0

-5

Earth: 50ft

Stat./Offset:


Sam

ple

Typ

e/N

o.

Town: Hartford

Project No.: 63-H137 / 0331-014.0


Route No.:




Northing: 839663.9

Appendix 5 2008 Geotechnical Laboratory

Testing

Appendix 6 Limitations

GEOTECHNICAL LIMITATIONS Explorations 1. The analyses and recommendations submitted in this report are based in part upon the data

obtained from widely spaced subsurface explorations. The nature and extent of variations between these explorations may not become evident until further explorations are made and construction occurs. If variations then appear evident, it will be necessary to reevaluate the recommendations of this report.

2. The generalized soil and bedrock profile described in the text is intended to convey trends in

subsurface conditions. The boundaries between strata are approximate and idealized and have been developed by interpretations of widely spaced explorations and samples; actual soil and bedrock transitions are probably more erratic. For specific information, refer to the boring logs.

3. The geologic and geomorphologic settings at this site are complex and the uncertain historic

site usage has resulted in the varied distribution and stress history of compressible soils across the site. Limited spacing of borings and lab testing can at best, only allow for estimates to be developed for duration and magnitude of consolidation settlements.

4. Water level readings have been made in the drill holes at times and under conditions stated

on the boring logs. These data have been reviewed and interpretations have been made in the text of this report. However, it must be noted that fluctuations in the level of the groundwater may occur due to variations in river levels, rainfall, temperature, and other factors occurring since the time measurements were made.

Review 5. In the event that any changes in the nature, design or location, of the proposed retaining wall

the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and conclusions of this report modified or verified in writing by GeoDesign, Inc. It is recommended that this firm be provided the opportunity for a general review of design and specifications in order that earthwork and foundation recommendations may be properly interpreted and implemented in the design and specifications.

Use of Report 6. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use H.W. Lochner, Inc., the Connecticut

Department of Transportation (ConnDOT), and other members of the design team for specific application to the construction of Retaining Wall 101 located south of the proposed Broad Street Bridge in Hartford, Connecticut, in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices. No other warranty, express or implied, is made.

7. This final design soil and foundation engineering report has been prepared for this project

by GeoDesign. This report is for design purposes only and is not sufficient to prepare an accurate bid. Contractors wishing a copy of the report may secure it with the understanding that its scope is limited to design considerations only.

legend and boring logs appended to this report. 3. ... soil samples screened in the ... s = split...

Documents