lecture: april 8, 2003
DESCRIPTION
Lecture: April 8, 2003. Continuum Emission in AGN. UV-Optical Continuum. Infrared Continuum. High Energy Continuum. Radio Continuum - Jets and superluminal motion. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Lecture: April 8, 2003
• Continuum Emission in AGN
• UV-Optical Continuum
• Infrared Continuum
• High Energy Continuum
• Radio Continuum - Jets and superluminal motion
Goal: The foundation of all astrophysical observations is the photon. All morphological and spectral information about astrophysical sources is derived from the emitted radiation. We learned about the power of line emission (spectroscopy) Continuum radiation is a natural consequence of the principle that accelerating charges radiate.
Can have : thermal or nonthermal emission
Spectral Energy Distribution
AGN show emission lines in all astrophysically relevant wavelength regimes
Power Law Continuum• Emission observed from 108 Hz to 1027Hz:
α=energy index now know to differ in different
bands
ανAνL )(
Actual SED is a function of the AGN Class
From last class:AGN Taxonomy
• Seyfert galaxies 1 and 2
• Quasars (QSOs and QSRs)
• Radio Galaxies
• LINERs
• Blazars
• Related phenomena
• Definition: radio-loud if
is larger than 10 (Kellermann et al. 1989)
• RL AGN have prominent radio features 10% of AGN population • RL: BLRGs, NLRGs, QSRs, Blazars RQ: Seyferts, most QSOs
• Deep radio surveys show intermediate sources
opticalradio LLR /
The Continuum
A phenomenological approach:
• Power law continuum
• Thermal features
• Spectral Energy Distributions of
Radio-loud and Radio-quiet AGN
Observing the SEDs of AGN
Types of Continuum Spectra
• Blazars: non-thermal emission from radio to gamma-rays (2 components)
• Seyferts, QSOs, BLRGs: IR and UV bumps (thermal) radio, X-rays (non-thermal)
Spectral Energy Distributions (SEDs): plots of power per decade versus frequency (log-log)
Spectral Energy Distributions
IR bump
Big Blue BumpEUV gap
Sanders et al. 1989
The radio and IR bands
• Radio emission is two orders of magnitude or more larger in radio-loud than in radio-quiet
• Radio and IR are disconnected, implying different origins
The IR and Blue bumps
• LIR contains up to 1/3 of Lbol
LBBB contains a significant fraction of Lbol
• IR bump due to dust reradiation, BBB due to blackbody from an accretion disk
• The 3000 A bump in 4000-1800 A:• Balmer Continuum• Blended Balmer lines• Forest of FeII lines
The highest energies• Typically α=0.7-0.9 in 2-10 keV • Radio-loud AGN (BLRGs, QSRs) have flatter X-ray
continua than radio-quiet• Soft X-ray excess is also observed, often smoothly
connected to UV bump• The only AGN emitting at gamma-rays
( MeV) are blazars
Blazars’ SEDs
Red blazars: 3C279 Blue blazars: PKS 2155-398
Wehrle et al. 1999 Bertone et al. 2001
Blazar SEDs main features
• Two main components:• Radio to UV/X-rays • X-rays to gamma-rays
• Component 1 is polarized and variable Synchrotron emission from jet• Component 2: possibly inverse Compton scattering
A fundamental question
How much of the AGN radiation is primary and how much is secondary?
• Primary: due to particles powered directly by the central engine (e.g., synchrotron, accretion disk)
• Secondary: due to gas illuminated by primary and re-radiating
An important issue
Isotropy of emitted radiation
• Thermal radiation is usually isotropic• Non-thermal radiation can be highly
directed (“beamed”). In this case: • We can not obtain the true luminosity of
the AGN• We will not have a true picture of various
AGN emission processes
Interpreting the BBBFrom accretion disk theory (last class),
And the maximum emission frequency is at
i.e., in the EUV/soft X-ray emission region.
Hz 106.3 16max ν
BBB=thermal disk emission?!
1. UV-Optical Continuum
Model Spectrum of an Accretion Disk
Spectrum from an accretion disk• Optically thick, geometrically thin accretion disk
radiates locally as a blackbody due to sheer viscosity
• Total integrated spectrum goes like ~ν2 at low frequencies, decays exponentially at high frequencies
• For intermediate frequencies spectrum goes as ~ ν1/3
• T=T(R) and T is max in the inner regions in correspondence of UV emission
• After removing the small blue bump, the observed continuum goes as ν-0.3
• Removing the extrapolation of the IR power law gives ν-1/3 - but is the IR really described by a power law??
• More complex models predict Polarization and Lyman edge – neither convincingly observed
Observations of optical-to-UV continuum
Disk interpretation is controversial!
Alternative interpretation
• Optical-UV could be due to Free-free (bremsstrahlung) emission from many small clouds Barvainis 1993
• Slope consistent with observed (α~0.3), low polarization and weak Lyman edge predicted
• Requires high T~106 K
Is an accretion disk really there?
Indirect evidence:
Fitting of SEDs Double-peaked line profiles
Direct evidence: Water maser in NGC 4258
Optical emission lines
Eracleous and Halpern 1984
Water Masers in NGC 4258
Within the innermost 0.7 ly, Doppler-shifted molecular clouds:
• Obey Kepler’s Law• Massive object at
center
2. The IR emission
• In most radio-quiet AGN, there is evidence that the IR emission is thermal and due to heated dust
• However, in some radio-loud AGN and blazars the IR emission is non-thermal and due to synchrotron emission from a jet
Evidence for IR thermal emission
• Obscuration :
Many IR-bright AGN are obscured (UV and optical radiation is strongly attenuated)
IR excess is due to re-radiation by dust
Radial dependence of dust temperature
From the balance between emission and absorption:
With R in pc, Leff in erg/s, T in Kelvin
5/12
6 )(10R
LT eff
Hotter dust lies closer to the AGN
Evidence for IR thermal emission
• IR continuum variability :
IR continuum shows same variations as UV/optical but with significant delay
variations arise as dust emissivity changes in response to changes of UV/optical that heats it
Emerging picture
• The 2μ-1mm region is dominated by thermal emission from dust (except in blazars and some other radio-loud AGN)
• Different regions of the IR come from different distances because of the radial dependence of temperature
The 1μ minimum
• General feature of AGN
• Consistent with the above picture: hottest dust has T~2000 K (sublimation temperature) and is at 0.1 pc
• This temperature limit gives a natural explanation for constancy of the 1μ minimum flux