lecture 1 : introduction

17
Spring 2010 - ÇG IE 398 - lecture 1 1 lecture 1 : introduction This lecture tries to answer the following questions: how different is IE from other engineering disciplines and from management? what is the relationship between IE, OR and MANAGEMENT SCIENCE ? what is IE work about? who needs SYSTEMS THINKING and why? what is SYSTEMS THINKING anyway?

Upload: ayasha

Post on 18-Jan-2016

32 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

lecture 1 : introduction. This lecture tries to answer the following questions: how different is IE from other engineering disciplines and from management? what is the relationship between IE, OR and MANAGEMENT SCIENCE ? what is IE work about? who needs SYSTEMS THINKING and why? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: lecture 1 : introduction

Spring 2010 - ÇG IE 398 - lecture 1 1

lecture 1 : introductionThis lecture tries to answer the following questions:

•how different is IE from other engineering disciplines and from management?

•what is the relationship between IE, OR and MANAGEMENT SCIENCE ?

•what is IE work about?•who needs SYSTEMS THINKING and why?

•what is SYSTEMS THINKING anyway?

Page 2: lecture 1 : introduction

Spring 2010 - ÇG IE 398 - lecture 1 2

what is IE work about?• IE seeks to improve organised human activity• organised human activity takes place in what we

can perceive as organisations or human activity systems

• human activity systems are social systems in the first place

• all engineering work has a social context, but systems that non-IE engineers work with are mostly perceived as technical systems

• technical systems are embedded in almost all human activity systems

• for this reason, human activity systems can also be called socio-technical systems

Page 3: lecture 1 : introduction

Spring 2010 - ÇG IE 398 - lecture 1 3

how different is IE ?• engineers are concerned with goal seeking

systems that are primarily closed• this means that there is a goal the system

wants to achieve• such systems can be put into a laboratory

and studied in isolation from the environment

• the system can thus be reduced to its parts and analysed

• analysis can provide knowledge and understanding of a closed system

Page 4: lecture 1 : introduction

Spring 2010 - ÇG IE 398 - lecture 1 4

• IE is concerned with purposeful systems that are always open

• a purposeful system is an organisation with goal seeking individuals

• these goals can change from person to person and also from time to time

• open systems do not fit into laboratories

• understanding an open system will not be possible through analysis only

Page 5: lecture 1 : introduction

Spring 2010 - ÇG IE 398 - lecture 1 5

• analysis of a system reveals its structure and how it works; its product is knowledge, not understanding

• we need systems thinking to understand human activity systems

• systems thinking includes and complements analysis

• this is how OR/IE is different from most engineering and from “disciplinary” science

Page 6: lecture 1 : introduction

Spring 2010 - ÇG IE 398 - lecture 1 6

IE – OR – MS • OR provides the “scientific” basis of IE• the mathematical models and

techniques used by IE are primarily OR models and techniques

• in the past, IE was more concerned with the engineering applications of OR

• IE now deals with almost all applications of OR, alongside traditional engineering

• MS is another term for OR

Page 7: lecture 1 : introduction

Spring 2010 - ÇG IE 398 - lecture 1 7

who needs systems thinking ?As we already said before, IE learning

has dual objectives:• mastering quantitative analysis

and mathematical modelling (OR, probability theory, statistics, economics etc)

• building systems thinking skills in order to put this knowledge into effective use

Page 8: lecture 1 : introduction

Spring 2010 - ÇG IE 398 - lecture 1 8

what is systems thinking ?five real-life examples that need ST:1. an emergency services call centre• answering, recording and checking

calls• providing fast response• balancing costs and waiting times• difficulty in evaluating response rate a queueing, or waiting line problem

Page 9: lecture 1 : introduction

Spring 2010 - ÇG IE 398 - lecture 1 9

2. vehicle scheduling• varying pick-up/delivery times• “time-windows”• labour rules• capacity and congestion

restrictions• 20! = 2 432 902 000 000 000

000least time, least distance, least

cost ?

Page 10: lecture 1 : introduction

Spring 2010 - ÇG IE 398 - lecture 1 10

3. writing a mission statement• should be relevant and

meaningful• achievable and measurable

goals and targets• active cooperation and

participation must be secured• often a compromise• lengthy canvassing and

negotiations neededsoft OR; problem structuring

Page 11: lecture 1 : introduction

Spring 2010 - ÇG IE 398 - lecture 1 11

4. the “Deep Cove” project• an environmentally responsible economic

project to transport tail race water• no permanent residence in the sound,

reduced tanker speed, rubbish removal etc.

• but there will be other ecological risks:− increased salination− faster mixing of fresh and salt water− risk of spills− risk of introducing pests and poaching− etc.

conflicting objectives, MCDM

Page 12: lecture 1 : introduction

Spring 2010 - ÇG IE 398 - lecture 1 12

5. screening for breast cancer• early tretment of growths • incidence rises with age• 95% chance of cure if detected at

preinvasive phase• mammography effective 85% of the

time• costs $200 000-$300 000 per machine;

$50-$100 per screening etc.what is the best screening policy ?how do we balance costs and human

suffering ?

Page 13: lecture 1 : introduction

Spring 2010 - ÇG IE 398 - lecture 1 13

common features of these situations:– a complex problem situation

• what is the problem? • what do we mean by a solution?

– incomplete information– situation conceived as a system;

meaning that a system is,• not an ontological entity (ontology is an

area of metaphysics that studies the nature and existence of reality)

• but it is an epistemological entity (epistemology is an area of metaphysics that studies the nature of knowledge about reality)

Page 14: lecture 1 : introduction

Spring 2010 - ÇG IE 398 - lecture 1 14

– situation requires systems thinking such as:•hard OR, or•soft OR

– all these situations involve gaining knowledge about a human activity system and all such knowledge is heavily meaning loaded and experience based

– knowledge is gained in what Checkland (1) calls the experience – action cycle:

Page 15: lecture 1 : introduction

Spring 2010 - ÇG IE 398 - lecture 1 15

Page 16: lecture 1 : introduction

Spring 2010 - ÇG IE 398 - lecture 1 16

“systems thinking is to formulate some systems relevant to aspects of perceived reality that is of interest and then to use the systems in a methodology to find out about, or gain insight to, or engineer some of the world outside”the following figure from Checkland (1) summarises the difference between the two perspectives:

------------------------------------------------------------------(1) Checkland P.,J. Scoles Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Wiley 1990

Page 17: lecture 1 : introduction

Spring 2010 - ÇG IE 398 - lecture 1 17