learning outcomes in legal education professor paul maharg glasgow graduate school of law

46
Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Upload: bruce-waters

Post on 18-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Learning outcomesin legal education

Professor Paul Maharg

Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Page 2: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 2

How do you arrive at outcomes?

Lawyers and educationalists work together: what should students should be able to do, know, value, appreciate? The process:

focuses on essential knowledge, skills, attitudes, values links back, eg to LLB process and content sets expectations of student performance clarifies assessment expectations

-- William Spady (1994) Outcome-based Education: Critical Issues andAnswers, Arlington, VA, adapted

NB: Programmes of study are not essential: outcome statements are distinct from processes of learning and assessment of learning

Eg ‘By the end of [X] students should be able to …’

Page 3: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 3

Eg Qualifying as a Solicitor, Annex 1…

B. Ability to complete legal transactions and resolve legal disputes, including the ability to:

• work with clients to identify their objectives, identify and evaluate themerits and risks of their options, and advise on solutions;• establish business structures and transact the sale or purchase of abusiness;• progress civil and criminal matters towards resolution using a range oftechniques and approaches;• deal with various forms of property ownership and transactions;• obtain a grant of representation and administer an estate;• draft the agreements and other documentation that will enable theseactions and transactions to be completed;• plan and implement strategies to progress cases and transactionsexpeditiously and with propriety.

Page 4: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 4

Design-back is critical…

David Prideaux (2003) ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: curriculum design,

British Medical Journal, 326:268-270

David Prideaux (2003) ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: curriculum design,

British Medical Journal, 326:268-270

Page 5: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 5

… across three types of curriculum …

Page 6: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 6

… and three levels of urgency

must learn now

could learn now

should learn now

Page 7: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 7

What improvements should outcome statements bring?

clarity as to what constitutes professionalism for lawyers, students and trainees

clearer focus on standards in skills & knowledge more structured but flexible assessments statement of a definite threshold of achievement to

be reached by trainees at any particular stage more liaison between partners, eg Law Society, LPC

providers, training organisations. firmer basis for professional accreditation later in a

practitioner’s career encourage innovation in curriculum design &

development

Page 8: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 8

Disadvantages of outcomes?

being general, they give little guidance in planning interventions

objectives tend to become ‘ad hoc substitutes for hypotheses’

they give the illusion of predicting what ought to happen they imply the idea of ‘teacher-proofing’ the curriculum,

thus losing the value of ‘divergent interpretations’ they stop students having their own outcomes they inhibit speculation they have unexpected consequences for universities as

institutions, as well as teacher practice Lawrence Stenhouse, Authority, Education and Emancipation, London, Heinemann, 1983, pp 81-2, adapted

Page 9: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 9

Can outcomes encompass all learning?

No – because learning … is neither a product nor a service (though it involves both) is not only a change in behaviour but a change in personal

values, attitudes, intellectual positions, cannot be accurately predicted

Page 10: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 10

But outcomes can enable innovation in teaching & learning …

Eg objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): history-taking diagnosis prognosis for an example of a bioethics OSCE, see www.wings.buffalo.edu/faculty/research/bioethics/osce.html

Eg transactional learning: active learning. learning to do legal transactions. transaction + reflection. collaborative learning. holistic process learning.

Page 11: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 11

… eg through outcomes-based simulations …

are close to the world of practice, but safe from the (possible) realities of malpractice.

enable students to practise legal transactions, discuss the transactions with other tutors, students, and use a variety of instruments or tools, online or textual, to help them understand the nature and consequences of their actions

encourage collaborative learning and thinking about the type of professional they want to become

students begin to see the potential for the C in ICT; and that technology is not merely a matter of word-processed essays & quizzes, but a form of learning that changes quite fundamentally what and how they learn.

facilitate a wide variety of assessment, from high-stakes assignments with automatic fail points, to coursework that can double as a learning zone and an assessment assignment

Page 12: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 12

… with practical & innovative assessments

For examples of forms of assessment, see US Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education:

http://www.ahsc.arizona.edu/azmec/June%2003%20Newsletter.doc.

direct observation or shadowing standardized oral / clinical skills examinations objective standardized exams simulations and models chart-stimulated recall global rating 360 Degree Evaluation OSCE portfolios record review

Page 13: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 13

Page 14: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 14

Page 15: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 15

So what could be affected under outcomes-based professional learning?

1. methods of teaching and learning2. materials and resources3. timetable of study, work-based practice & assessment4. subject knowledge and skills that are the focus of classes or

workshops5. pre-existing aims & objectives6. distance, open, flexible and resource-based learning methods7. staff training – in designing, teaching, facilitating, assessing8. evaluation methods aligned to professional practice9. monitoring and accreditation guidelines10. wider context of curriculum and work-based context11. communication & partnership amongst all involved parties

Page 16: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 16

Page 17: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 17

Page 18: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 18

Page 19: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 19

Page 20: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 20

Page 21: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 21

Page 22: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 22

Page 23: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 23

Page 24: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 24

Page 25: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 25

Page 26: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 26

Page 27: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 27

Page 28: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 28

Page 29: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 29

Page 30: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 30

Transactional learning:Private Client project

General outline: Students wind up the estate of a deceased client who dies intestate,

via 4 assignments. Students drafted: Initial Writ Estate Valuation Correspondence Forms C1, IHT 200 & supplements a will

Resources: no lectures, no exams: instead, tutorials and coursework 50 scenarios virtual collection of the client’s estate online assessment & submission of assignments FAQ online tutor assessment on average, six outcomes per assessment

Page 31: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 32

Page 32: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 33

Look again at Qualifying as a Solicitor, Annex 1…

B. Ability to complete legal transactions and resolve legal disputes, including the ability to:

• work with clients to identify their objectives, identify and evaluate themerits and risks of their options, and advise on solutions;• establish business structures and transact the sale or purchase of abusiness;• progress civil and criminal matters towards resolution using a range oftechniques and approaches;• deal with various forms of property ownership and transactions;• obtain a grant of representation and administer an estate;• draft the agreements and other documentation that will enable theseactions and transactions to be completed;• plan and implement strategies to progress cases and transactionsexpeditiously and with propriety.

Page 33: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 34

Can portfolio learning be a key assessment of outcomes?

Yes, if it’s a sophisticated & complex learning tool – for example an e-portfolio, which:

is a continuation of undergraduate PDP through to CPD is wholly electronic and wholly embedded in simulation learning

activities and actual legal practice contains annotated text and video, graphics, animation, etc draws information from personal, academic and CPD domains evidences transactional learning and reflection has assessment zones, personal zones, confidential zones is wholly the responsibility of the learner-manager, under detailed

professional guidelines is in part under supervision by tutors, supervisors, Law Society

Page 34: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 35

Page 35: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 36

Page 36: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 37

Page 37: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 38

Page 38: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 39

Page 39: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 40

Page 40: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 41

Page 41: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 42

Page 42: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 43

Page 43: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 44

Page 44: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 45

Page 45: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 46

Page 46: Learning outcomes in legal education Professor Paul Maharg Glasgow Graduate School of Law

Standing Conference on Legal Education, November, 2005 47

contact details

Professor Paul Maharg

T: 44 00 (0)141 548 4946E: [email protected]: http://zeugma.typepad.com

Glasgow Graduate School of LawLord Hope BuildingUniversity of Strathclyde141 St James’ RoadGlasgow G4 0LU