learning and reflecting – individually and in the team
DESCRIPTION
Learning and reflecting – individually and in the Team. Hvad er læring ?. Den psykologiske fejlforståelse: Vi lader som om der er sammen-fald mellem det der bliver under-vist i og det der bliver lært. Student centered learning. Teach me… and I will forget ?. Tell me and I will forget - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Learning and reflecting – individually and in the Team
2
Hvad er læring ?
Den psykologiske fejlforståelse:
• Vi lader som om der er sammen-fald mellem det der bliver under-vist i og det der bliver lært.
Teach me… and I will forget ?
Tell me and I will forget
Show me and I will remember
Involve me and I will understand
Step back and I will actChinese proverb
Student centered learning
Carl Rogers on teaching at Harvard in 1951
• I have come to feel that the only learning which significantly influences behavior is self-discovered, self-appropriated learning.
• It seems to me that anything that can be taught to another is relatively inconsequential, and has little or no significant influence on behavior.
The magic of self-directed learning
Learning is the process of acquiring new behavior potential. It is an efective strategy to make the learner responsible for their own learning.This explains the succes of methods like project organized learning and Problem-based learning
Effectivity of educational formats (after Bales)
5 %10 %
LectureReading
AudiovisualDemonstratio
nDiscussion group
Practice
Teaching others
Averageretention
20 %
30 %
50 %
75 %80 %
7
Erfaringsbaseret læring
Test
Generalisering
Refleksion
Erfaring
Kolb’s læringscirkel, med John Cowan’s ord (Cowan 1998).
Learning is the process whereby knowledge is created through the transformation of experiences - David Kolb
Learning is a function of the activity, context, and culture in which it normally occurs, thus it is situated- Jean Lave & Etienne Wenger
8
Erfaringsbaseret læring – en realistisk (virkelig) model
Cowan’s udbyggede spiralmodel, med små refleksionssløjfer.
planlagte/initierede
”tilfældige”/(personlige)
Learning styles
Individuals’ different ways of taking in and processing information
- Richard Felder
How do you do reading?
Some people…sometimes…
Purpose of Testing Learning Style• To know about yourself - ‘in which way
a student is smart’ rather than ‘whether this student is smart or not’
• To help learners to develop learning strategies and improve their learning by balancing it.
• To work with our teaching style to match and maximize student learning
But not to • Divide people into a set category as
blood types – instead, it is just measuring height or weight along some point in life
Forskellig læringsstil 1:Informationskanal
Visuel • ‘Vis mig hvordan’
• Billeder
• Diagrammer
• Tegninger
• Grafer
Verbal • ‘Forklar mig
hvordan’
• Talte ord
• Skrevne ord
Forskellig læringsstil 2:Opfattelse
Sansende• Fokus på input via
sanserne• Praktisk • Observerende • Konkret: fakta og
data• Repetition
Intuitive • Fokus på det
ubevidste
• Imaginative
• Leder efter mening
• Abstrakt: teori og modeller
• Variation
Forskellig læringsstil 3:Informationsbehandling
Aktiv• ‘Lad os prøve det’
• Bearbejder aktivt
• Hopper ud i det
• Holder af gruppearbejde
Refleksiv• ‘Lad os tænke over
det’• Bearbejder
introspektivt• Arbejder roligt• Starter langsomt• Holder af at arbejde
alene eller i par
Forskellig læringsstil 4:Forståelse
Sekventiel • Fungerer med
delvis forståelse
• Stabil fremgang
• Har nemt ved at forklare
• Analyse, detaljer
Global • Skal have overblik
for at fungere• Først langsom, så
store fremskridt• Har ikke nemt ved
at forklare• Syntese, system-
tænkning
Strong(-)
Moderate
(-)
Mild(-)
Mild(+)
Moderate
(+)
Strong(+)
Active(-)/Reflective(+)
68 137 157 84 42 5
Sensitive(-)/Intuitive(+)
38 126 154 98 53 24
Visual (-)/Verbal (+)
118 197 112 55 10 1
Sequential(-)/Global(+)
5 70 144 177 81 16
The learning styles of the 493 students divided into strong, moderate and mild preferences, AAU, 2003 (Kolmos & Holgaard 2008)
Learning style preferences related to disciplines at Aalborg University (Kolmos & Holgaard 2008)
Profession Active%
Sensing%
Visual%
Sequential
%
Architecture & Design (N=77) 79 38 96 32
Building & Civil Engineering (N=63) 84 81 95 60
Computer Engineering & Science (N=70)
71 69 81 47
Physics & Nanotechnology (N=25) 80 52 92 28
Electronics (N=57) 72 74 88 40
Mathematics (N=14) 50 71 79 57
Global Business Development & Industry (N=73)
78 55 85 68
Chemistry, Bio- & Health Technology (N=62)
53 77 77 52
Geography, Land Surveying and Planning & Environment (N=52)
77 71 81 44
Summary
• All types of learners are needed in every profession
• All learning styles are needed to addressed and satisfied in teaching
www.comestic.com
Take Felders learning style test (ILS Questionnaire)Please discuss with your group (mixed) members:How can you make best of and learn from each other based on your individual strengths and weakness?Can you use the knowledge of your learning styles to improve the team work on the projects?Prepare a short (2 min) presentation of the most important results from the discussion.Presentation app. 13.30