leadership effectiveness survey-2009. objective of the study to measure the perception about the...
DESCRIPTION
Rationale behind the questionnaire Questionnaire designed to analyse the following characteristics: Ability to direct influence motivate do things effectively foster team work coach and develop Champions leadershipTRANSCRIPT
LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY-2009
Objective of the study
To measure the perception about the leadership effectiveness in BHEL-Trichy.
Leadership Effectiveness of • BHEL as organisation.• the immediate manager and other managers
with whom the executives work.
The Survey covered executives of Trichy from E1 to E8 level.
Rationale behind the questionnaire
Questionnaire designed to analyse the following characteristics:
Ability to direct influence motivate do things effectively foster team work coach and develop Champions leadership
Overall Analysis of the Survey
Analysis % fvbl.
% ntrl.
% unfvbl. Index Score
Perceptions on the Leadership Effectiveness of BHEL-Tiruchi as an Organization ( Questions 1 - 9)
87.185(86.74)
8.622(6.81)
4.19(6.45)
82.99(80.29)
Perceptions on the Leadership Effectiveness of their immediate manager and other manager(s), if any, with whom they work (Questions 10 - 56)
84.045 (81.38)
10.01(9.138)
5.94(9.47)
78.1(71.90)
Overall (Q1-Q56) 85.61(84.06)
9.31(10.68)
5.06(7.96)
80.5(76.09)
Fig within bracket :2007 results
Overall Ratings based on Factors
BHEL-Tiruchi Organization - Factors
%fav. %ntrl. %unfvbl. Index Score
-Organizational Direction 89.89 (88.44)
6.90(6.11)
3.2(5.45)
86.69(82.99)
Effective Leadership 85.26(84.02)
9.6(8.50)
5.06(7.48)
80.2(76.54)
Change Management 82.66(85.18)
11.2(7.00)
6.13(7.82)
76.53(77.36)
Leadership Effectiveness: Overall
87.18(86.74)
8.62(6.81)
4.19(6.45)
82.99(80.29)
Fig within bracket :2007 results
Perception on Immediate Manager and other Managers
No. Survey Factor % fvbl. %ntrl. %unfvbl. Index Score
I. Provides Direction 85.2(81.87)
9.70(9.25)
5.09(8.87)
80.1(73.00)
II. Is an Effective Leader 86.01(83.94)
8.78(7.93)
5.2(8.11)
80.44(75.82)
III. Influences others 85.57(83.29)
9.28(9.11)
5.133(7.58)
80.44(75.82)
IV. Fosters Teamwork 84.17(85.45)
10.20(6.87)
5.61(7.66)
78.55(77.78)
V. Motivates Others 83.89(80.98)
9.33(9.09)
6.77(9.91)
77.12(71.06)
VI. Coaches & Develops 81.16(76.05)
11.63(12.03)
7.2(11.91)
73.96(64.00)
VII. Champions Change 82.08(77.49)
11.2(9.87)
6.7(12.6)
75.37(64.85)
84.045 (81.38)
10.01(9.138)
5.94(9.47)
78.1(71.90)
Fig within bracket :2007 results
Factors with Low Scores
No. Survey Factor % fvbl. % ntrl. % unfvbl. Index Score
1 Coaches & Develops
81.16(76.05)
11.63(12.03)
7.2(11.91)
73.96(64.00)
2 Champions Change
82.08(77.49)
11.2(9.87)
6.7(12.6)
75.37(64.85)
3 Motivates others
83.89(80.98)
9.33(9.09)
6.77(9.91)
77.12(71.06)
Fig within bracket :2007 results
Area wise Analysis
No. Work No of Response % fvbl. % ntrl. % unfvbl. Index
Score1 ATP 21 83.50 9.69 6.80 76.70
2 COMMERCIAL(FB) 40 84.20 10.00 5.80 78.39
3 E&C/FBC&HRSG 59 84.17 9.17 6.65 77.51
4 ENGINEERING/FB 113 80.84 12.31 6.84 74.00
5 FINANCE 56 79.46 11.22 9.31 70.15
6 HR 26 84.68 9.20 6.11 78.57
7 M&S AND CIVIL 65 92.28 4.91 2.80 89.47
8 MODERNISATION 13 83.10 12.36 4.53 78.57
9 OPERATIONS(BS) 86 86.19 7.99 5.81 80.37
10 P & D 29 82.45 10.65 6.89 75.55
11 QUALITY 48 84.85 11.23 3.90 80.95
12 SPARES BUSINESS 50 86.78 11.21 2 84.78
13 SSTP 14 85.96 6.76 7.27 78.69
14 VALVES 66 84.90 8.63 6.46 78.43
15 WRI 20 83.92 13.12 2.94 80.98
16 OTHERS 43 87.37 7.76 4.85 82.51
Age wise Analysis
Leadership ofBHEL as AN ORGANISATION
Leadership ofIMMEDIATE MANAGER
Level % fvbl. % ntrl. % unfvbl. Index Score % fvbl. %
ntrl. % unfvbl. Index Score
55 + 91.24 6.15 2.59 88.64 87.58 8.19 4.22 83.36
45 to 55 yrs 89.35 7.32 3.31 86.03 85.77 9.18 5.04 80.73
35 to 45 Yrs 80.96 13.82 5.20 75.76 75.07 14.87 10.04 65.02
< 35 Yrs 75.90 13.85 10.23 65.66 79.17 11.76 9.06 70.11
Analysis by Years of Service
Leadership of BHEL as an Organization Leadership of Immediate Manager
Service(Years) % fvbl. % ntrl. % unfvbl.
Index Score % fvbl. % ntrl. % unfvbl.
Index Score
>30 yrs 91.46 6.17 2.35 89.10 86.97 8.71 4.31 82.65
21-30 Yrs 88.37 8.20 3.42 84.95 84.93 9.49 5.57 79.35
11-20 Yrs 77.77 14.32 7.89 69.87 74.54 14.97 10.48 64.06
6 -10 yrs 83.33 12.86 3.80 79.53 78.44 24.10 30.36 48.08
1-5 yrs 79.24 10.45 10.29 68.95 83.69 8.39 7.97 75.71
Findings• First three major areas of leadership skills identified as essential to Managerial Success in Trichy
unit are:
1. Coaches & Develops
2. Motivates others
3. Champions Change
Findings(Continued)
• Finance, Engineering/FB, P&D are the least satisfied with the present situation in the area wise analysis
• The employees who are in age group of 35 – 45 and seem to be least satisfied.
• Employees in the ‘less than 35 years of age’ group are also less favorable to the prevailing situation.
Findings (continued)
• People with number of years of experience between 6 to 10 years are more unfavorable
• The 11-20 years experience group are also not favourable to the
current situation.
• The youngest group (1-5 years) is favourable to the leadership of
the immediate manager and not so with the organization's leadership.
• The real reasons could be ascertained through focused group
discussion.
Communication of Results Communicated to DROs & Published in Home Page of HR
Communication to all Executives
On Low scoring Parameters Half a day workshop for DROs & AGMs by External Faculty
On Low scoring Groups Half a day workshop for select employees / departments / age
group
Actionable points from the above three workshops will be shared with DROs
Action Plan – LES 2009