leadership and equality stephen reicher, university of st. andrews, scotland [email protected]...

15
Leadership and Equality Stephen Reicher, University of St. Andrews, Scotland [email protected] Glasgow: September 28 th 2010

Upload: richard-palmer

Post on 25-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Leadership and Equality

Stephen Reicher, University of St. Andrews, [email protected]

Glasgow: September 28th 2010

Part 1

Leaders

Leaders and Followers

Leaders Followers and Groups

Leadership is a ‘we’ relationship between leaders and

followers bound together by common category membership (social identity).

Leadership is a process of social identity management

Leaders must be one of us

The leader must reflect what makes ‘our’ group distinctive from other groupsLeaders must act for usThe leader must act in the interests of our group as opposed to him/herself or other groups

Leaders must achieve for usLeaders must embed identity in social reality. That is, they must be successful in terms of group priorities

The key to leadership: Doing it for us

Doing it for us

…we must put the mistakes of New Labour behind us… We started as the government of the windfall tax and the minimum wage and ended up defending bankers’ bonuses and.. embarrassed by our trade union links

when I was twelve years old the phone rang and we were told she had been assassinated by the South African secret service... Some people will wonder about why I got to care about politics. When something like that happens, what kid wouldn’t.

To return to power we must put the mistakes of New Labour behind us…We won’t get back into power again or sustain ourselves in power unless we create a genuine Labour movement again.

Part 2

Leadership and inequality

Prototypicality and social support

We are more likely to support, trust and be influenced by ingroup members.

We are more likely to put in effort to support the projects of leaders seen as ingroup

Much therefore depends upon how we define the group, who belongs to it and who best represents it

Prototypicality and ambition

Police officersSurgical trainees

From Ryan (2010)

Fitting in….

… and dropping out

NO ROLE NO ROLE MODELSMODELS

LOWER LOWER IDENTITYIDENTITYLACK of FITLACK of FIT

REDUCED REDUCED AMBITIONAMBITION

UNWILLING to UNWILLING to SACRIFICESACRIFICE

EXITEXIT

Cues to belonging

Images and symbols Timing of activities

Traditions Food and drink

Celebrations Built environment

Socialising Criteria for selection

Experience of others Literature

Institutional Identity Audit

A systematic analysis of institutional practices to determine what they communicate about who belongs, who ‘fits’ and who is best suited to

represent us.

A criterion against which all policies and practices are evaluated so as to generate increase

motivation, generate ambition and maximise the human resources available to the institution