layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain...

223
LAYOUT FOR RETROFITTING AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE By Himani Mazumder B.Sc., MBA A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Sustainable Infrastructure Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology Swinburne University of Technology Victoria, Australia January 2015 Doctoral Committee: Professor Ajay Kapoor, Principal Co-ordinating Supervisor Dr. Mehran Ektesabi, Associate Supervisor Dr. Clint Steele, Associate Supervisor

Upload: others

Post on 14-Jan-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

LAYOUT FOR RETROFITTING AN

ELECTRIC VEHICLE

By

Himani Mazumder

B.Sc., MBA

A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of

Doctor of Philosophy

Centre for Sustainable Infrastructure

Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology

Swinburne University of Technology

Victoria, Australia

January 2015

Doctoral Committee:

Professor Ajay Kapoor, Principal Co-ordinating Supervisor

Dr. Mehran Ektesabi, Associate Supervisor

Dr. Clint Steele, Associate Supervisor

Page 2: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

I

ABSTRACT

Global automotive industry is facing a great challenge in achieving an

emission-free environment. There is several alternate transportation solutions are

introduced to the industry among which the electric vehicle (EV) has created a new

paradigm in the context of zero emission schema. The Original Equipment

Manufacturers (OEMs) have taken initiatives to commercialize the EVs in a large

scale, but limitations involved with EV technology has been found as a barrier to the

rapid industrialization. The crucial limitation would be the production cost of EVs.

Retrofitting has been considered as an ideal method for the prompt adaptation of EV

by the consumers as it offers lower costs and short time-to-market. Retrofitting of

EVs possesses the concerns for the appropriate placement of the power-trained

components as it involves significant change in the weight of the vehicle. The change

in vehicle weight controls the dynamic stability of the vehicle in driving conditions.

In this context, the attention goes to the selection of suitable propulsion system,

electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for

the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises the battery performance in

operating condition. Therefore, it is required to develop a balanced retrofitting

system which can be compatible with the dynamic characteristics and safety

concerns of the battery performance during vehicle crash.

In this study, three architectural layouts were defined for evaluation based on

the placement positions of the components. The architectural layouts led towards the

longitudinal, lateral and vertical position of centre of gravity (CG) of the retrofitted

vehicle which changed the dynamic characteristics of the vehicle in different

manoeuvring conditions. The layouts were defined considering the specification of

the mule vehicle. Analysing the dynamics of three layouts, a new architectural layout

was proposed in this research. The mule vehicle was simulated in the dynamic

conditions considering the proposed layout. The proposed layout was validated

experimentally in case of a demo vehicle in the lab. Then the proposed load

Page 3: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

II

distribution layout was implemented in the mule vehicle model in the simulation and

the dynamic characteristics were compared with the results found in other load

distribution layouts.

Considering the new retrofitting layout, a further study on the safety analysis

of the packaging arrangement and cooling system for the battery pack was

accomplished. A novel design for the packaging and cooling system of the battery

was provided in this research. Validation of the design included the structural safety

analysis considering the vehicle crash. A whole cooling circuit integrated with the

existing components for the retrofitted vehicle was proposed in this study. The use of

existing components was to enhance the efficiency of the system by avoiding the cost

escalation. The efficiency of the designed battery cooling system was determined and

demonstrated through the fluid-solid-interface analysis process.

The research focused on a suitable and sustainable retrofitting layout

analysed based on the dynamic handling and stability of a selected vehicle parameter,

the structural safety and thermal analysis of the battery packaging arrangement and

cooling system.

Page 4: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

III

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

First of all, I would like to express my sincere gratitude and

acknowledgement to my principal co-ordinating supervisor, Professor Ajay Kapoor

for his constant supervision, support, encouragement and enthusiasm providing me

theoretical and technical guidance and valuable feedback throughout these years.

I would also like to thank my associate supervisors Dr. Mehran Motamed

Ektesabi and Dr. Clint Steele for their constructive suggestions during the course of

this research.

My PhD study was financed by Automotive Co-operative Research Centre

(AUTOCRC) and Swinburne University of Technology scholarship. I hereby greatly

appreciate their contribution and provision of using the EV Lab equipment which

facilitated this research.

I would like to thank my colleagues Dr. Mehedi Hasan and Md. Shamsul

Arefin for their support in technical knowledge and software expertise.

I would like to express my sincere thanks and gratefulness to my parents for

their utmost support and encouragement for my study. I am hereby deeply indebted

to my husband and my daughter for their support and sacrifice without which I could

not have reached at this stage. I wish to express my gratitude to my family for

walking with me on this journey with the infinite love, support and encouragement.

Page 5: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

IV

Dedicated to:

My beloved parents, Cherished husband & adorable daughter

Page 6: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

V

DECLARATION

I declare that this thesis represents my own work and contains no material

which has been accepted for the award of any other degree, diploma or qualification

in any university. To the best of my knowledge and belief this thesis contains no

material published or written by other person except where due acknowledgement

has been made.

Himani Mazumder

January, 2015.

Page 7: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

VI

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................................................. I

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................. III

DECLARATION ..................................................................................................................................... V

TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................... VI

LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ XII

LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................... XV

LIST OF NOTATIONS AND ACRONYMS ................................................................................ XVII

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1

1.1 PROBLEM STATEMENT ................................................................................................................ 2

1.2 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................ 4

1.3 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................... 4

1.4 PROJECT FLOWCHART ................................................................................................................. 6

1.5 THESIS STRUCTURE ..................................................................................................................... 8

CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................ 12

2.1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS ....................................................................................................... 12

2.2 ALTERNATIVE POWER FOR AUTOMOBILES ............................................................................... 13

2.2.1 The Hybrid and Plug-in Hybrid Vehicle ........................................................................ 14

2.2.2 Hydrogen Fuel Cell......................................................................................................... 15

2.2.3 The Full Electric Vehicle ................................................................................................ 15

2.2.4 Vehicle System Architecture ........................................................................................... 16

2.2.4.1 Electric Propulsion System ................................................................................... 16

2.2.4.2 Electric Motor ....................................................................................................... 18

2.2.4.3 Electric Motor Used in Commercial EVs ............................................................. 20

2.2.4.4 Evaluation of Existing Vehicle Architectures ...................................................... 21

2.2.4.5 Brake System ......................................................................................................... 23

2.2.4.6 Suspension System ................................................................................................ 23

2.3 VEHICLE DYNAMIC ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 24

2.3.1 Configuration of tyres ..................................................................................................... 25

2.3.2 Road Surface Friction ..................................................................................................... 26

2.3.3 Aerodynamic Drag .......................................................................................................... 27

2.3.4 Vehicle Model and Simulation ........................................................................................ 27

Page 8: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

VII

2.3.5 Tyre Model for longitudinal, lateral and normal forces ................................................ 30

2.4 STRUCTURAL SAFETY ANALYSIS OF BATTERY PACKAGING .................................................... 31

2.4.1 EV Batteries .................................................................................................................... 31

2.4.2 Batteries Used in Commercial EVs ................................................................................ 33

2.4.1 Packaging of EV Batteries .............................................................................................. 34

2.4.2 Analysis of Battery Packaging Design ........................................................................... 36

2.5 BATTERY COOLING SYSTEM & THERMAL ANALYSIS ............................................................... 37

2.5.1 Air and Water Cooling System ....................................................................................... 38

2.5.2 Cooling System Used in Commercial EVs ..................................................................... 39

2.5.3 Use of PCM as Cooling Material ................................................................................... 40

2.5.4 Thermal Management of Batteries ................................................................................. 41

2.6 RETROFITTING OF EVS .............................................................................................................. 44

2.7 FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................... 45

CHAPTER 3 RETROFITTED ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT .................................................... 46

3.1 EV PROPULSION SYSTEM SELECTION ....................................................................................... 47

3.2 ELECTRIC MOTOR SELECTION .................................................................................................. 49

3.3 VEHICLE SELECTION ................................................................................................................. 51

3.4 BRAKE SYSTEM ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................ 54

3.4.1 FE Model details ............................................................................................................. 55

3.4.2 Boundary conditions and input data for the analysis .................................................... 55

3.4.1 Results and discussion .................................................................................................... 58

3.5 SUSPENSION SYSTEM ANALYSIS ............................................................................................... 59

3.6 BATTERY PACKAGING ............................................................................................................... 62

3.6.1 Selection of suitable places in the vehicle ...................................................................... 63

3.7 CAD MODEL OF THE LOAD DISTRIBUTION LAYOUTS ................................................................ 64

3.7.1 Geometry Considerations for the CAD Model ............................................................... 64

3.7.2 Front Loaded Layout (Case I) ........................................................................................ 65

3.7.1 Mid Loaded Layout (Case II) ......................................................................................... 66

3.7.1 Rear Loaded Layout (Case III) ....................................................................................... 66

3.8 LOAD DISTRIBUTION OF THE VEHICLE ....................................................................................... 67

3.8.1 Longitudinal load distribution ........................................................................................ 67

3.8.1.1 Longitudinal load distribution: case I ................................................................... 68

3.8.1.2 Longitudinal load distribution: case II .................................................................. 68

3.8.1.3 Longitudinal load distribution: case III ................................................................ 69

3.8.2 Lateral load distribution ................................................................................................. 70

3.9 VEHICLE PERFORMANCE AND EFFECT OF CG ........................................................................... 70

3.9.1 Calculation of longitudinal CG ...................................................................................... 71

3.9.2 Calculation of lateral CG ............................................................................................... 71

Page 9: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

VIII

3.9.3 Calculation of vertical CG .............................................................................................. 72

3.10 DISCUSSION AND FINDINGS ....................................................................................................... 72

CHAPTER 4 VEHICLE DYNAMIC ANALYSIS ............................................................................ 75

4.1 POLAR MOMENT ........................................................................................................................ 78

4.2 PATH RADIUS ............................................................................................................................ 79

4.3 VEHICLE MODEL ....................................................................................................................... 80

4.3.1 Modelling Assumptions ................................................................................................... 81

4.3.1.1 Moving Load ......................................................................................................... 82

4.3.1.2 Camber Angle ....................................................................................................... 82

4.3.1.3 Angle of Inclination .............................................................................................. 82

4.3.1.4 Road Surface ......................................................................................................... 82

4.3.2 Sudden Manoeuvring Vehicle Dynamics ........................................................................ 83

4.3.2.1 The Motion Plane .................................................................................................. 84

4.3.2.2 Longitudinal, lateral and normal force ................................................................. 85

4.3.2.3 Steering Angle ....................................................................................................... 87

4.3.2.4 Velocity and Yaw rate ........................................................................................... 88

4.3.2.5 Front and Rear Slip ............................................................................................... 88

4.3.3 Vehicle Cornering Dynamics .......................................................................................... 89

4.3.3.1 Sprung and Un-sprung Roll .................................................................................. 90

4.3.3.2 Wheels Block ........................................................................................................ 90

4.3.3.3 Body Sensor Block ................................................................................................ 91

4.3.3.4 Vehicle Trajectory ................................................................................................. 92

4.3.3.5 Lateral Load Transfer – Tyre Grip ....................................................................... 93

4.4 RESULTS .................................................................................................................................... 95

4.4.1 Polar moment .................................................................................................................. 95

4.4.2 Path Radius ..................................................................................................................... 96

4.4.1 Velocity and Yaw Rate .................................................................................................... 96

4.4.2 Front and Rear Slip ........................................................................................................ 97

4.4.3 Vehicle Trajectory ........................................................................................................... 99

4.4.4 Lateral Load Transfer and Tyre Grip .......................................................................... 101

4.5 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................. 102

4.5.1 Analysis on polar moment and curved path radius calculation .................................. 103

4.5.2 Analysis on sudden change in manoeuvre condition ................................................... 103

4.5.3 Analysis on cornering behaviour of the vehicle ........................................................... 104

4.5.4 Comparison based on dynamic behaviour of the vehicle ............................................ 105

4.6 FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................. 105

4.6.1 The proposal of a new architectural layout ................................................................. 106

4.6.1.1 CAD Model of the proposed layout .................................................................... 106

Page 10: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

IX

4.6.1.2 Load distribution ................................................................................................. 107

4.6.1.3 Calculation of CG ............................................................................................... 108

CHAPTER 5 EXPERIMENT RESULTS AND VALIDATION OF PROPOSED LAYOUT .. 110

5.1 EXPERIMENT SET UP ................................................................................................................ 111

5.1.1 Frictional Coefficient of the track (lab floor) .............................................................. 113

5.1.2 CG Calculation ............................................................................................................. 114

5.1.2.1 Longitudinal and lateral CG ................................................................................ 114

5.1.2.2 Vertical CG.......................................................................................................... 114

5.1.3 Measurement of turning radius .................................................................................... 117

5.1.4 Measurement of contact patch ...................................................................................... 117

5.2 EXPERIMENT AND SIMULATION RESULTS FOR THE TEST VEHICLE .......................................... 118

5.2.1 Polar Moment ............................................................................................................... 118

5.2.2 Turning Radius .............................................................................................................. 119

5.2.3 Vehicle Trajectory ......................................................................................................... 119

5.2.4 Tyre grip ........................................................................................................................ 120

5.2.5 Velocity and yaw rate ................................................................................................... 122

5.2.1 Forces on tyres .............................................................................................................. 123

5.2.2 Slip Ratio ....................................................................................................................... 125

5.3 ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC RESULTS FOR THE TEST VEHICLE ...................................................... 126

5.3.1 Analysis based on cornering dynamics ........................................................................ 127

5.3.2 Analysis based on tyre model ....................................................................................... 127

5.4 SIMULATION OF TOYOTA CAMRY BASED ON PROPOSED LAYOUT ........................................... 128

5.5 FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................. 130

CHAPTER 6 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF BATTERY PACKAGING ................................ 131

6.1 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN .............................................................................................................. 132

6.1.1 Design targets ............................................................................................................... 133

6.1.2 Geometry Definition ..................................................................................................... 134

6.1.3 Design Options .............................................................................................................. 135

6.1.4 Vehicle Crash Simulation ............................................................................................. 136

6.1.4.1 Boundary Conditions and Governing Equations ................................................ 137

6.1.4.2 Nodal force, displacement and stress during the crash test ................................ 137

6.1.5 Design Model ................................................................................................................ 141

6.2 MATHEMATICAL MODEL FOR THE TRANSIENT STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS ................................. 142

6.3 COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS ................................................................................................... 143

6.3.1 Material Properties ....................................................................................................... 143

6.3.2 Meshing ......................................................................................................................... 144

6.3.3 Boundary Conditions .................................................................................................... 145

Page 11: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

X

6.3.3.1 Battery Temperature with time steps .................................................................. 145

6.4 RESULTS .................................................................................................................................. 146

6.4.1 Total deformation .......................................................................................................... 146

6.4.2 Equivalent stress ........................................................................................................... 147

6.5 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................. 149

6.6 FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................. 149

CHAPTER 7 THERMAL ANALYSIS OF BATTERY COOLING SYSTEM ........................... 151

7.1 BATTERY PACK CONFIGURATION ........................................................................................... 154

7.2 MATHEMATICAL MODEL ......................................................................................................... 155

7.2.1 Fluid Structure Interaction ........................................................................................... 157

7.3 COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS ................................................................................................... 158

7.3.1 Material Properties ....................................................................................................... 158

7.3.2 Geometry ....................................................................................................................... 159

7.3.3 Meshing ......................................................................................................................... 161

7.3.4 Boundary Conditions .................................................................................................... 163

7.3.4.1 Fluid temperature ................................................................................................ 163

7.3.4.2 Flow Domain ....................................................................................................... 164

7.3.4.3 CFX Solver Control ............................................................................................ 166

7.3.4.4 Battery Temperature with Time steps ................................................................. 166

7.3.5 Transient Thermal Analysis Module ............................................................................ 166

7.4 RESULTS .................................................................................................................................. 168

7.4.1 CFX Analysis ................................................................................................................. 168

7.4.2 Transient Thermal Analysis .......................................................................................... 170

7.5 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................. 172

7.5.1 Fluid Flow Analysis ...................................................................................................... 172

7.5.2 Transient Thermal Analysis .......................................................................................... 173

7.6 FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................. 174

CHAPTER 8 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE RECOMMENDATIONS ................................. 176

8.1 CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................................... 176

8.1.1 Retrofitted Architectural Layout ................................................................................... 176

8.1.2 Vehicle Dynamic Analysis ............................................................................................ 179

8.1.3 Structural Safety Analysis of the Battery Cooling System ........................................... 182

8.1.4 Thermal Analysis of the Battery Cooling System ......................................................... 182

8.2 KEY FINDINGS OF THE RESEARCH ........................................................................................... 183

8.3 FUTURE RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................. 185

REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................... 187

APPENDIX .......................................................................................................................................... 194

Page 12: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

XI

LIST OF PUBLICATIONS

Mazumder, H.; Ektesabi, M.; Kapoor, A., “Effect of mass distribution on

cornering dynamics of retrofitted EV”, IEEE International Electric Vehicle

Conference, 4-8 March 2012

Hasan, M.; Mazumder, H.; Ektesabi, M., “Vehicle modeling for electronic

stability control in a four in-wheel electric vehicle”, IEEE International Electric

Vehicle Conference, 4-8 March 2012

Mazumder, H; Hasan, M.; Ektesabi, M.; Kapoor, A., “Performance analysis

of EV for different mass distributions to ensure safe handling”, ICAEE, 26-28

December 2011

Lovatt,H., Elton, D.; Cahill, L.; Huynh, D.; Stumpf, A.; Kulkarni, A.; Kapoor

, A.; Ektesabi, M.; Mazumder, H.; Dittmar, T.; White, G., "Design procedure for low

cost, low mass, direct drive, in-wheel motor drive trains for electric and hybrid

vehicles", IECON, November 2011

Kulkarni, A.; Mazumder, H.; Ektesabi, M.; Kapoor, A., "Evaluation of

vehicle architectures for in-wheel electric vehicle drive train design”, AutoCRC

Conference, 7 July 2011

Lovatt,H., Elton, D.; Cahill L.; Huynh, D.; Stumpf, A.; Kulkarni, A.; Kapoor,

A.; Ektesabi, M.; Mazumder, H.; Dittmar, T.; White, G., "Design procedure for low

cost, low mass, direct drive, in-wheel motor drive trains for electric and hybrid

vehicles", AutoCRC Conference, 7 July 2011

Page 13: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

XII

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1-1: Project Flowchart ..................................................................................... 7 

Figure 3-1: Comparison based on weight and efficiency of 100 KW motors ............ 50 

Figure 3-2: Thermal load input data for the analysis ................................................ 57 

Figure 3-3: Boundary conditions and load applied on the disc ................................. 57 

Figure 3-4: Total deformation found in the disc due to both the thermal and elastic

load .......................................................................................................... 58 

Figure 3-5: Von-Mises stress and thermal strain generated under the effect of

thermal and elastic load in the disc ........................................................ 59 

Figure 3-6: Total deformation (elastic) of the spring ................................................. 61 

Figure 3-7: Normal stress of the spring ..................................................................... 62 

Figure 3-8: Front-loaded Layout ............................................................................... 65 

Figure 3-9: Mid-loaded Layout .................................................................................. 66 

Figure 3-10: Rear Loaded Layout .............................................................................. 67 

Figure 4-1: Forces acting on different components ................................................... 76 

Figure 4-2: Forces acting on the tyres while cornering ............................................. 78 

Figure 4-3: The schematic diagram of the simulation ............................................... 81 

Figure 4-4: Vehicle model in sudden maneuvering condition .................................... 84 

Figure 4-5: The Plane of the motion .......................................................................... 85 

Figure 4-6: Steering angle for sudden maneuvering .................................................. 87 

Figure 4-7: Calculation of velocity and yaw rate ....................................................... 88 

Figure 4-8: Model for cornering behavior of the vehicle ........................................... 89 

Figure 4-9: Sprung and un-sprung roll calculation ................................................... 90 

Figure 4-10: Steering angle for cornering dynamic model ........................................ 91 

Figure 4-11: Lateral force on the front (drive) and rear wheels accordingly ........... 91 

Figure 4-12: The calculation of Tyre Grip ................................................................. 94 

Figure 4-13: Vx & Vy (m/s Vs time sec.) accordingly for front loaded layout ........... 96 

Figure 4-14: Vx & Vy (m/s Vs time sec.) accordingly for mid loaded layout ............ 97 

Figure 4-15: Vx & Vy (m/s Vs time sec.) accordingly for rear loaded layout ............ 97 

Figure 4-16: Yaw rate Vs time accordingly for front, mid and rear loaded layout ... 97 

Page 14: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

XIII

Figure 4-17: Front and rear slip Vs time sec. (Front load case I) ............................. 98 

Figure 4-18: Front and rear slip Vs time sec. (Mid load case I) ............................... 98 

Figure 4-19: Front and rear slip Vs time sec. (Rear load case) ................................ 99 

Figure 4-20: Vehicle trajectory plot (Front loaded layout) ..................................... 100 

Figure 4-21: Vehicle trajectory plot (Mid loaded layout) ........................................ 100 

Figure 4-22: Vehicle trajectory plot (Rear loaded layout) ....................................... 101 

Figure 4-23: Tyre grip Vs. Lateral Load Transfer. .................................................. 102 

Figure 4-24: The proposed architectural layout ...................................................... 107 

Figure 5-1: Experiment set up of the vehicle in the lab ............................................ 112 

Figure 5-2: Diagram for CGH calculation .............................................................. 114 

Figure 5-3: Vertical CG calculation ........................................................................ 116 

Figure 5-4: The profile of contact patch of the tyre ................................................. 117 

Figure 5-5: Vehicle trajectory plot (Test Vehicle).................................................... 120 

Figure 5-6: Lateral load transfer over time sec. ...................................................... 121 

Figure 5-7: Tyre grip of the vehicle over time sec. .................................................. 121 

Figure 5-8: Vx & Vy (m/s Vs time sec.) accordingly for test vehicle ....................... 122 

Figure 5-9: Yaw rate Vs time sec. for test vehicle .................................................... 122 

Figure 5-10: Longitudinal force, Fx (N) on each tyre over time sec. ....................... 123 

Figure 5-11: Lateral force, Fy (N) on each tyre over time sec. ............................... 124 

Figure 5-12: Normal force Fzf and Fzr (N) on each tyre over time sec................... 124 

Figure 5-13: Angular velocity rad/s over time sec. .................................................. 125 

Figure 5-14: Total Slip, σ at front and rear tyre accordingly over time sec. ........... 125 

Figure 6-1: Process flowchart of structural safety analysis of the battery packaging

and cooling arrangement ...................................................................... 133 

Figure 6-2: Hollow square sections of the cooling pipe .......................................... 135 

Figure 6-3: CAD model of the Outer shell and Chassis for the specification of Toyota

Camry .................................................................................................... 138 

Figure 6-4: Nodal forces generated at 3 defined nodes with time ........................... 139 

Figure 6-5: Nodal displacement in meshed view of the vehicle ............................... 140 

Figure 6-6: Contours of effective stress (v-m) at time .............................................. 141 

Figure 6-7: CAD model created using SolidWorks .................................................. 142 

Figure 6-8: Tetrahedral mesh of the structure ......................................................... 145 

Page 15: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

XIV

Figure 6-9: Temperature of the battery pack with time ............................................ 146 

Figure 6-10: Total deformation in design iteration 2............................................... 147 

Figure 6-11: Stress (Pa) developed in design iteration 1 ......................................... 148 

Figure 6-12: Stress (Pa) developed in design iteration 2 ......................................... 148 

Figure 7-1: Cooling Circuit in the front bay ............................................................ 152 

Figure 7-2: Simulation Process used in FSI analysis .............................................. 153 

Figure 7-3: Thermal Conductivity data of Aluminum Alloy ..................................... 158 

Figure 7-4: CAD model of battery cooling system ................................................... 159 

Figure 7-5: Flow path of coolant through the pipe .................................................. 160 

Figure 7-6: General Mesh of the Design Model....................................................... 161 

Figure 7-7: Mapped Face meshing with refinement for the coolant pipe ................ 161 

Figure 7-8: RMS target value with time sec. ............................................................ 162 

Figure 7-9: Domain imbalance with time sec. for refined mesh .............................. 163 

Figure 7-10: Inlet, outlet and wall in CFX-Pre module ........................................... 165 

Figure 7-11: Detail flowchart of FSI analysis.......................................................... 167 

Figure 7-12: Temperature probes placed to get the temperature of different locations

of the battery ....................................................................................... 168 

Figure 7-13: Velocity profile of the coolant fluid flow ............................................. 169 

Figure 7-14: Pressure profile of coolant fluid (inlet, outlet and wall) ..................... 169 

Figure 7-15: Temperature profile of pipe acting as heating/cooling interface ........ 170 

Figure 7-16: Battery temperature magnitude ramp accordingly at 11.11 and 33.33

sec. ...................................................................................................... 171 

Figure 7-17: Temperature data chart at four temperature probes .......................... 172 

Page 16: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

XV

LIST OF TABLES

Table 3-1: Comparison of three EV propulsion systems ............................................ 48 

Table 3-2: Comparison model of different electric motors ........................................ 51 

Table 3-3: Comparison of Different Vehicle Parameter (data collected from industry)

................................................................................................................. 52 

Table 3-4: Vehicle specification and parameters for Toyota Camry Attara S ........... 54 

Table 3-5: Parameter used in the analysis ................................................................. 55 

Table 3-6: Thermo-mechanical properties of the disc material................................. 56 

Table 3-7: Properties of the spring and damper ........................................................ 60 

Table 3-8: Longitudinal load distribution of front loaded layout (Case I) ................ 68 

Table 3-9: Longitudinal load distribution of mid loaded layout (Case II) ................ 69 

Table 3-10: Longitudinal load distribution of rear loaded layout (Case III) ............ 69 

Table 3-11: EV component placement and different load properties of front, mid and

rear architectural layouts ....................................................................... 73 

Table 4-1: Average values of the frictional coefficient of road surface ..................... 83 

Table 4-2: The aerodynamic drag force calculated for three load cases .................. 86 

Table 4-3: Calculation results of polar Moment ........................................................ 95 

Table 4-4: Calculation results of Path Radius ........................................................... 96 

Table 4-5: Comparison on dynamic analysis results ............................................... 105 

Table 4-6: Load distribution of the vehicle .............................................................. 108 

Table 4-7: The longitudinal, lateral and vertical position of CG ............................ 108 

Table 5-1: Drive train configuration of the test vehicle ........................................... 111 

Table 5-2: Parameter of the vehicle ......................................................................... 113 

Table 5-3: Load on each tyre ................................................................................... 113 

Table 5-4: Experimental data and result of the vehicle ........................................... 116 

Table 5-5: Contact patch and effective radius of the tyre calculation ..................... 118 

Table 5-6: Summery of computational and experimental results for test vehicle .... 126 

Table 5-7: Comparison of proposed layout with front and mid loaded layout ........ 129 

Table 6-1: Outer dimensions of Li-Ion phosphate battery ....................................... 134 

Table 6-2: Sectional properties of Grade 350 (AU standard) steel ......................... 135 

Page 17: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

XVI

Table 6-3: Material properties of concrete .............................................................. 136 

Table 6-4: Mechanical properties of Aluminum Alloy ............................................. 143 

Table 6-5: Mechanical properties of Grade 350 steel ............................................. 144 

Table 6-6: Comparison between two design iterations ............................................ 150 

Table 7-1: Battery Configuration for EV retrofitting ............................................... 154 

Table 7-2: Standard Model Coefficients .................................................................. 157 

Table 7-3: Material Properties of the coolant ........................................................ 158 

Table 7-4: Thermal properties of aluminum alloy ................................................... 158 

Table 7-5: Background physics data of the analysis model ..................................... 164 

Table 7-6: Inlet boundary conditions ....................................................................... 165 

Table 7-7: Outlet boundary conditions .................................................................... 166 

Page 18: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

XVII

LIST OF NOTATIONS AND ACRONYMS

CFD Computational Fluid Dynamics

FSI Fluid-Solid Interface

OEM Original Equipment Manufacturer

CG Centre of Gravity

EV Electric Vehicle

BEV Battery Electric Vehicle

HEV Hybrid Electric Vehicle

PHEV Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle

ICE Internal Combustion Engine

PCM Phase Change Material

Fx Longitudinal tyre force

Fy Lateral tyre force

Fz Normal force on tyres

Fxf Longitudinal force on front tyres

Fxr Longitudinal force on rear tyres

Fyf Lateral force on front tyres

Fyr Lateral force on rear tyres

Fzf Normal force on front tyres

Fzr Normal force on rear tyres

Fa Aerodynamic drag force

FR Rolling resistance

δ Steering angle

Yaw rate

Wb Wheel base

Tr Track width

Vx Longitudinal velocity

Vy Lateral velocity

Page 19: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

XVIII

M Vehicle weight

σx Longitudinal slip

σy Lateral slip

αf Front tyre slip angle

αr Rear tyre slip angle

lf Longitudinal distance from CG to front tyres

lr Longitudinal distance from CG to rear tyres

CGH Vertical distance from CG to ground

µ Tyre road friction coefficient

R Radius of the curved path

ρ Fluid density

K Thermal conductivity

Cp Specific heat

Page 20: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

1

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

Environmental awareness worldwide led the automobile industry to

concentrate on the development of alternative solution which can provide emission

free transportation. The emission free transportation agenda possesses a great change

in technology for the long adopted automobile consumers. In this technological

challenge replacing the petroleum products for fuel in transportation is the main

concern. There are several solutions introduced to the industry. These alternatives are

hybrids, plug-in hybrids, full electric vehicles, hydrogen-fuel etc. Among these

solutions, full electric vehicles or the battery electric vehicles provide zero carbon

emissions, i.e. the most effective technology for the green transportation to date. But

electric vehicles (EVs) require further attention in engineering research to be a

suitable replacement of internal combustion engine vehicles for the mass market of

the automobile users worldwide. Currently, EVs are exhibiting many technological

advances. Till now, considering the growing interest of automobile consumers

towards it and the imposing facilities, rules and regulation from the Governments of

different countries in the world, the development of EVs is getting more attention.

The technological advances involves in it are creating great challenges for the

engineers to collaborate with the existing system in proceeding with the EV

development. Research on light-weight materials for the automobile body,

regenerative braking system, motor controlling techniques for the electric motor,

electronic stability controllers of the vehicle are adding new aspects to the EV

development field. The automotive OEMs all over the world are introducing new

models of commercial EVs especially the passenger vehicles such as Nissan Leaf,

Mitsubishi i-MiEV, the hybrid vehicle GM Chevy Volt, E-Buses, electric bikes etc.

But approaching towards the mass production of commercial EVs has been a

challenge for the industry due to the cost issues. The main concern with the mass

Page 21: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

2

production of commercial EVs has been the adaption of the new technology to the

consumers. As an alternative to replace the long accepted petrol engine vehicles, EVs

are not yet established in the mass market. Though the EVs and hybrids have been

introduced as the transportation alternative for urban use within 100-120 Km of

driving range, the limited range anxiety of the consumers are still crucial for the

adaptation of the EVs commercially. The limited infrastructure for the recharging of

the EV batteries has been another obstacle to overcome the range anxiety associated

with EVs. As the mass production of EVs is not yet established to the industry, a

transition period has been going on with the commercialization of the alternative

green transportation. In this transition, the conversion of existing internal combustion

engine (ICE) vehicles to the electric drives is an effective way in terms of cost and

time to market linked with it. But more analysis requires enhancing the performance,

durability and ease of retrofitting the existing vehicles to EVs.

This research was focused on the development of a new engineering system

for retrofitting the battery EVs which included the architectural layout of placing all

the drive train components, load distribution based on the position of the

components, the packaging of battery of the vehicle and the design of the cooling

system for the battery etc. The study mainly developed a new architectural layout to

place the drive components for the EVs considering the retrofitting issues. The

dynamic behaviour of the vehicle based on the both analytical and experimental

results of different handling and stability characteristics was analysed to validate the

proposed new layout. The new layout concept was proposed for the retrofitting after

evaluating different existing load distribution layouts. Then the packaging

arrangement for the battery was designed and analysed based on the structural safety

aspects of the vehicle considering the vehicle crash situation. The cooling system of

the battery was designed considering the proposed layout in this research and the

thermal analysis was done to obtain the operating state of battery temperature.

1.1 Problem Statement The environmental requirement directs to an alternative solution for emission

free transportation. Among all solutions introduced to the automobile industry, EVs

Page 22: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

3

have become very promising as an option with some limitations associated with it

such as range, costs and re-charging infrastructure. Considering the costs,

manufacturing time and the adaptation issues as a new technology in the well-

accepted ICE vehicle market, the retrofitting is an optimum solution at the

transitional stage. The mass production of new EVs involves a great financial

investment for the automotive OEMs, but at this stage the adaptability issue with this

new technology is creating hindrance for this investment. Retrofitting provides a

balance of trade considering the lower cost because of the use of existing chassis and

body, quick time to market. But due to the lack of dynamic performance data

involved with retrofitting, the adaptation issue is ruling the industry. Retrofitting

includes an enormous escalation in vehicle weight and effective change in weight

distribution because of the placement of the heavy battery pack. This change affects

the dynamic balance of the vehicle in driving condition. Therefore, the users come

across an uncertainty about the dynamic performance of the vehicle. Installing the

stability controller in the retrofitted vehicle can be a way to solve the handling

problem of the vehicle, though the increase of cost involved is a crucial concern with

retrofitting. In this regard, regulating the dynamic handling characteristics of the

retrofitted vehicle is becoming more important. The load distribution layout by

placing the EV drive train components in different locations of the vehicle is the

most effective solution to control the vehicle handling characteristics. As retrofitting

involves using an existing vehicle, it is important to select a suitable vehicle

parameter and drive train system to obtain a better result. The selection of suitable

vehicle parameter for retrofitting is mainly based on small but enough space to place

the battery pack. Another concern is the compatibility of the existing brake and

suspension system with the added vehicle weight. The research focuses on the cost

effective way to solve the dynamic performance of the retrofitted vehicle and

determines the effective load distribution and architectural layout considering

different manoeuvring conditions.

As retrofitting has not yet accepted in the automobile industry commercially,

the proposed structure is required to be an all-inclusive system which considers all

the components of retrofitting such as battery packaging arrangement, cooling

system, the cooling circuit of the retrofitted vehicle. The battery pack for the EV

Page 23: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

4

propulsion plays a significant role in this process because it requires to be

accommodated in the limited and existing space of the vehicle with the massive

weight and volume of it. Therefore, the proper packaging arrangement for the battery

with the cooling system has become another vital issue for retrofitting with

consideration of structural and thermal safety.

1.2 Aims and Objectives As previously mentioned, the retrofitting system for EV is required to

consider all of the components of it to get this technique well accepted by the

industry. On the other hand, the cost issues restrain the installation of new generation

technology like electronic stability controller to regulate the dynamic handling

characteristics of the vehicle.

The main objective of this research is to obtain an entire retrofitting layout

which can take care of all the basic concerns of retrofitting. The aim of the study is to

determine a suitable architectural layout at which the retrofitted vehicle can

demonstrate a stable dynamic behaviour in different manoeuvring conditions. The

study provides the vehicle performance analysis based on the dynamic characteristics

data of centre of gravity, polar moment, radius of the cornering path of the vehicle,

slip of the tyres in different manoeuvres. The research proposes an architectural

layout and provided experimental results to validate the proposal. Other retrofitting

concerns such as the packaging arrangement and cooling system of the battery pack

are designed and analysed in this study to verify the feasibility of the proposal and to

obtain a total retrofitting layout.

1.3 Methodology Prior to any numerical and experimental analysis on dynamic handling

characteristics in different manoeuvring conditions, appropriate EV propulsion

system, electric motor, mule vehicle including specification and parameter is

evaluated and selected for this study. Accordingly, finite element analysis for the

existing mechanical brake and suspension coil spring is performed in ANSYS as a

preliminary stage to provide the feasibility of the retrofitting system. Based on the

Page 24: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

5

selected components for EV drive train, three basic architectural layouts have been

evaluated in terms of dynamic stability of the vehicle. For this evaluation, a vehicle

model is created using MATLAB SIMULINK which can demonstrate different

dynamic characteristics of the vehicle in different manoeuvring conditions. Based on

the results obtained from this SIMULINK vehicle model, a new architectural layout

has been proposed to obtain a more suitable solution for retrofitting. Experimental

data is collected and analysed for the proposed architectural layout and the tyre

model is created to demonstrate the dynamic behaviour of the vehicle with proposed

layout in given manoeuvring condition.

The battery packaging arrangement is designed using the concept of

proposed architectural layout of the retrofitted vehicle. The configuration of the

suitable battery pack is determined considering the power requirement of the mule

vehicle. The feasibility of the design is then verified through the finite element

analysis using LS-DYNA and ANSYS. To create the appropriate inputs for the

structural safety analysis of the battery packaging arrangement, the vehicle crash is

simulated in ANSYS LS-DYNA. The effect of the sudden impact on the battery

packaging arrangement due to the crash is examined considering two design

iterations. Two design iterations are constructed based on the selection of Australian

standard of structural sections for the coolant pipe. The results of the analysis

determine the proper choice for the retrofitting system.

The battery cooling system is designed by facilitating the existing

components of the vehicle. The total cooling circuit of the vehicle is demonstrated in

this study based on the concept developed for proposed architectural layout. The FSI

analysis is performed to obtain the efficiency of the cooling system for the battery

pack. The temperature of the fluid flow is determined from the CFD analysis of the

coolant fluid and then the flow body temperature is coupled to the solid battery

structure. The initial solid body temperature is given as input in the thermal analysis

module for the battery. The given temperature profile is followed by the average

range of the selected battery configuration. The analysis results based on the

temperature data are obtained for different points of the battery pack due to the

coolant fluid flow temperature.

Page 25: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

6

1.4 Project Flowchart The study provided a balanced and stable system for retrofitting of the

selected vehicle specification. The assumptions made for the analysis were based on

the availability of the study resources and the simplification of the simulation model

and analysis. A flowchart was demonstrated in Figure 1-1 to display the process

integration of the retrofitting of this EV research project. The process flowchart

shows that background research and automotive industry data determined the drive

train accessories selection of the retrofitting. The selected parameter of the vehicle

calculated the load distribution and the CG of the vehicle from which three basic

loading conditions of the retrofitted vehicle were chosen for dynamic analysis such

as front-loaded (Case I), mid-loaded (Case II) and rear-loaded (Case III). To perform

the vehicle dynamic analysis two different manoeuvring conditions such as sudden

change in steering (Manoeuvre 1) while driving at a speed and cornering (Manoeuvre

2). Dynamic analysis results for these two manoeuvring conditions were evaluated in

case of selected vehicle parameter and validated experimentally in case of a

demonstration vehicle in the lab. After evaluation of dynamic analysis results a new

architectural layout for the vehicle loading was proposed. For this proposed layout,

transient thermal and structural analysis were accomplished for the battery packaging

and cooling system.

Page 26: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

7

Figure 1-1: Project Flowchart

Page 27: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

8

1.5 Thesis Structure The main focus of the research was to obtain an optimum architectural layout

for retrofitting an electric vehicle in which the battery packaging and cooling system

concerns would also be considered. In the CHAPTER 1, the basic concerns behind

the industry interest towards EVs including the environmental aspects, the balance of

trade with different fuel alternatives, retrofitting pros and cons are enlightened. The

study is conceived as having 7 major chapters which are briefly discussed here with a

general orientation of the overall approach.

CHAPTER 2 describes the background literature regarding environmental

aspects, brakes and suspension analysis, theory of vehicle motions for dynamic

analysis, the forces acting on the vehicle, tyre modelling, vehicle crash analysis,

structural analysis of the solid, cooling system of the battery, operating temperature

of the battery during charging and discharging condition, the fluid solid interface

analysis, computational fluid dynamic analysis of the coolant and the temperature of

the solid under the effect of fluid temperature. Literature review found the gap in the

research trend of EV development in focusing on retrofitting and other feasibility

issues associated with it.

CHAPTER 3 focuses on the evaluation and selection of power train

accessories of the vehicle such as electric motor, propulsion system, outer

dimensions and other specifications of the vehicle. Different propulsion system for

EV were compared based on connection diagram, transmission power loss,

packaging cost, space savings, motor packaging arrangement and weight impact.

Three propulsion systems for EV were evaluated. Those are: conventional, by-wheel

and in-wheel propulsion system. Among these, the in-wheel propulsion system was

chosen for this retrofitting study. To select the proper electric motor for retrofitting

of the vehicle, the brushed DC motor, induction motor, permanent magnet motor and

switch reluctance motor were evaluated based on efficiency, space and power to

weight ratio according to the literature review. Vehicle specification was selected by

comparing the market data of small, medium and SUV sector vehicles. Toyota

Camry 2.4L sedan was selected for the conversion. Removed and added weight items

were defined with the corresponding weight for retrofitting of the selected vehicle.

Page 28: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

9

The brake and suspension system of the selected vehicle was analysed considering

the extra weight due to the retrofitted weight of the vehicle. Three architectural

layouts depending on the placing of the battery, motor and motor controller in

different locations of the vehicle were selected for evaluation based on the dynamic

behaviour. Load distribution ratio and the position of centre of gravity of the vehicle

were calculated for three architectural layouts to proceed on the vehicle dynamic

analysis.

CHAPTER 4 concentrates on the vehicle dynamic analysis considering three

architectural layouts. Forces acting on the vehicle due to the motor power, tyre-road

interface friction, wind, gravity etc. were calculated for change in CG position due to

different architectural layouts. Two different manoeuvring conditions were

considered to simulate the dynamic handling and stability characteristics of the

vehicle which were sudden change in steering while driving and cornering of the

vehicle at a speed. Polar moment, turning radius in the dynamic condition of the

vehicle were calculated. Vehicle model was prepared assuming some driving

constraints such as road surface friction, inclination and camber of the path. In

sudden change in manoeuvre, the longitudinal and lateral velocity of the vehicle, slip

of the tyre at front and rear and yaw rate were calculated to compare three layouts. In

cornering analysis, the curved path followed by the vehicle, slip angles at the tyre,

lateral load transfer due to the centrifugal force and grip of the tyre based on that

were considered for evaluating the results in case of three layouts. The analysis was

done considering the Toyota Camry 2.4L sedan. The results for three load layouts are

evaluated and then this chapter proposes a new architectural layout based on placing

the EV drive train components in different locations.

CHAPTER 5 studies the new proposed architectural layout based on

experiment and vehicle model simulation. For experimental validation, a

demonstration vehicle was used in the lab to do the experiment in obtaining dynamic

behaviour of the vehicle in given manoeuvring condition. The load distribution and

CG data were collected from the test vehicle and experiment was accomplished to

calculate the dynamic characteristics which were compared with the simulation

results. Based on the experimental data collected from the test vehicle, the polar

moment, vehicle path, tyre grip, velocity of the vehicle were calculated using the

Page 29: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

10

simulation modelled in chapter 4. Tyre model was simulated to get the forces acting

on each tyre and the slip ratio. All the computational and experimental results data

were compared and analysed in context of the proposed architectural layout for

retrofitting of EV. After validating the proposed architectural layout, this chapter

provides the analysis result for Toyota Camry by using the proposed load distribution

and compares the with other load distribution layouts.

CHAPTER 6 demonstrates the design model of battery cooling system from

the conceptual stage to the structural safety analysis. The safety analysis considered

the vehicle crash for the design constraint of the cooling system and packaging of the

battery arrangement. In the conceptual design stage, the design targets, geometry

definition and design options were fixed. In determining the dimension of the cooing

duct for the battery cooling system, two sets of standard pipe dimensions were

designated for the design. Two design iterations were analysed and evaluated for the

cooling system design. The vehicle crash simulation was done considering the outer

shell and the chassis of the vehicle. Collecting the required data from the crash

simulation the transient structural analysis was performed to obtain the safety

analysis results for the battery packaging and cooling system. The design of

packaging arrangement and the cooling system of the battery was based on the

architectural layout proposed earlier. In the analysis result, the design life or

durability of the packaging and cooling system of the battery was also provided. The

analysis results were collected for two design options from which the best suitable

one was chosen.

CHAPTER 7 discusses the thermal analysis of the battery cooling system.

The thermal management of the battery pack in the operating condition of the electric

vehicle were considered as the crucial part for the state of health of the battery.

Battery pack configuration was selected to suit the power train requirement of the

Toyota Camry Attara sedan vehicle. Then the battery packaging arrangement of the

vehicle was designed considering the proposed architectural layout. In the

computation fluid dynamic analysis in obtaining the temperature effect of the cooling

fluid on the discharging temperature of the selected battery pack, the fluid solid

interface theory was applied. In the fluid solid interface, the results data were

collected from the fluid flow analysis and imported into the transient thermal

Page 30: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

11

analysis system to obtain the impact of the fluid temperature on the temperature of

the battery. The boundary conditions were designated for the thermal analysis both in

fluid flow analysis and the transient thermal analysis. The results found from the

both analysis were discussed in terms of the requirement of the retrofitting.

CHAPTER 8 describes the conclusions and the future recommendation based

on this study. The core objectives and methodology of the study are summarized and

a conclusion on the main results is presented. The limitations of the current study are

pointed out and recommendations are made for future works.

Page 31: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

12

CHAPTER 2

LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Environmental Aspects In recent years, global warming, climate change and environmental pollution

were the major concerns in automobile industry worldwide. According to global

annual green-house gas emissions by sector report 2013, the automobile industry

associated with its supply chains (transportation fuels and fossil fuel retrieval-

processing- distribution) caused around 50% of the annual greenhouse gas emissions.

CO2 (Carbon-Dioxide) gas consisted of the main portion of the greenhouse gas

emissions and automotive sector was the major source of CO2 emissions. Several of

the world’s major automotive markets adopted policies to reduce vehicle-related

CO2 emissions. In the typical life cycle of an automobile 75% of automotive-related

emissions were occurred during vehicle use (19% during fuel production, 4% during

the production of materials/components, and 2% during assembly work). In fact, of

all land-based modes of transport, vehicles were the most energy intensive with

petrol-powered vehicles consuming in aggregate more energy and producing more

greenhouse gas emissions than any other type of vehicle. Thus, fuel economy and

CO2 emission standards offered the best prospect for reducing vehicles’ contribution

to climate change. Moreover, the vehicles were a major cause of acid rain. Road

transport accounted for 48% of NO2 emissions in OECD (Organization for Economic

Cooperation and Development) countries on average, and around 60% of this was

accounted for by the automotive sector (Jain, 2009, Michalek et al., 2004).

According to the Department of climate change and energy efficiency

Australia (DCCEE, Australia) report 2012, transport emissions caused around 15%

of Australia’s total domestic emissions which was 85 Mt CO2-e in 2011. Based on

data collected from 2011 NGGI 1990 levels SGLP (2011) and CSIRO (2011),

DCCEE found the estimated carbon emissions in transportation sector in the duration

Page 32: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

13

of 1990 – 2030 would be increasing from 60 to 102 Mt CO2-e without carbon price.

They estimated this range would be 62 to 89 Mt CO2-e considering the carbon price.

Transport emission consisted of several subsectors such as road transport, domestic

aviation, domestic shipping, rail, off-road recreational etc. Among these, the road

transport subsector was found as the largest contributor in transport emissions which

was 85% (73 Mt CO2-e). Private light transport vehicles which were not covered by

the carbon price alone contributed 42 Mt CO2-e which was almost 50% of the total

transport emissions. So, changes in carbon price would not have significant effect on

the increasing trend of the transport emissions. This resulted into the consideration of

the alternative fuel solution for the light transport vehicles. While demand for less

emissions, bio-diesel was initiated to be adopted by the heavy vehicles which were

covered by the carbon price. But there were some limitations to adopt biodiesel for

the heavy vehicles and the light vehicles as well because of the required

infrastructure for the commercialization whereas only the diesel fuelled light vehicles

could be converted into the biodiesel vehicles. This solution would not have a

significant impact on the demand of less emission because less percentage of the

existing light vehicle was on diesel fuel. In these circumstances, in both carbon price

scenarios the attention went to the falling costs of hybrid and electric vehicles

competitive with internal combustion engine vehicles (Hickman et al., 2010,

Laschober et al., 2004, Morawska et al., 2005).

2.2 Alternative Power for Automobiles Intensive focus on the energy initiatives led to other solutions of alternative

power for automobiles. The most touted alternatives were hybrids, plug-in hybrids,

hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, full electric vehicles (Battery electric vehicles). All of

these alternatives included some limitations such as range, infrastructure, costs

compared to ICE vehicles. Although the environmental concerns were very crucial in

automobile industry, the commercialization of these alternative technologies was not

getting much adopted due to the associated limitations. Despite the limited number of

these vehicles on the roads, market research estimated 3.1% of global auto sales will

be EVs and plug-in HEVs by 2017 (Butler et al., 1999, Chan, 2002).

Page 33: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

14

2.2.1 The Hybrid and Plug-in Hybrid Vehicle

The hybrid, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) were widely publicised

as the apparent solution to the global carbon emission concerns as a substitute to the

conventional petrol engine vehicles that could lower the fuel usage and toxic

emissions. Having perspective of the consumers, automotive OEMs (Original

Equipment Manufacturers) had taken the environmental issues under consideration.

In the early 1990s, the management of Toyota decided that the company should

address environmental sustainability as a key challenge. In 1994 the company started

designing a vehicle to be twice as fuel efficient as existing vehicles and the result

was the Prius sedan. Launched worldwide in 1997, and now in its second generation

model, it achieved twice the fuel economy of similar sized vehicles, released one

tenth the carbon monoxide, hydrocarbon and NO2 emissions and only half the CO2

emissions. It worked by using a hybrid petrol/electric engine. Toyota has also

developed and brought to market a vehicle using a hydrogen fuel-cell engine that

developed 90kw of power and emits only water vapour (UNEP and ACEA 2002: 30;

National Roads and Motorists Association 2003: 47). In 1997, Daimler-Benz

committed to create hydrogen fuel-cell engines, with forecast annual production of

100,000 vehicles per annum powered by these engines by 2005. Ford later joined the

venture (Hawken et al, 1999: 26; Suzuki and Dressel 2002: 291). The Volkswagen

Lupo achieved fuel consumption of only 3 litres/100km, and the company had plans

to develop models that achieve 2 and 1 litre/100km (Hawken et al, 1999: 26). PSA

Peugeot Citroen had improved its diesel engines to the point where they deliver 40%

better fuel economy than a similar petrol engine and emissions were so low that a

diesel Peugeot 607 produced particulate emissions that registered at the lowest

measurable level of 0.004g/km, over 12 times lower than the limit required by

European legislation (UNEP and ACEA 2002: 31). HEVs had been the most popular

choice till date with Toyota Prius or Ford Fiesta in the market. Depending on the fuel

economy, durability, comparative price with ICE vehicles, safety HEVs had a much

larger impact on the automobile sales. HEVs included the electric motor to drive the

vehicle at low speeds or in traffic and the combustion engine to drive the vehicle in

Page 34: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

15

highway cruising at high speed or during hill climbing situation when required power

was very high (Chan, 2007, Decarlo et al., 2000).

2.2.2 Hydrogen Fuel Cell

Hydrogen fuel cell was a very promising option for green transportation.

Hydrogen fuel required the conversion set up of other fuels on board mounted in the

vehicle. Extracting hydrogen to supply in the fuel cell had been under research for

many years. In accordance with the usual natural gases (methanol, methane, propane,

octane are usually used), some research were accomplished in using a combination of

oxidation and steam reforming in the conversion process. These conversion methods

produced a substantial amount of pollution such as CO2. To avoid this CO2 emission,

the electrolysis method could be used to produce hydrogen which is involved with

mainly solar and wind energy. But this method was not cost effective to be

implemented widely (Lixin, 2009, Van Mierlo and Maggetto, 2007, Jain, 2009).

2.2.3 The Full Electric Vehicle

The full electric vehicles or battery electric vehicles consisted of electric

motor for power generation and the battery for storing of the generated power. It did

not include any engine or engine driven accessories for the drive train of the vehicle.

It possessed zero emissions. The commercialization of full EVs required huge

development in infrastructure for the charging facility of the battery. In this case, the

lack of infrastructure, limited range and high upfront costs were discouraging the

potential consumers. To date, EV’s in comparison with ICE vehicles, HEVs,

hydrogen fuel cells had intrinsic advantages such as EVs emit no tailpipe pollutants,

although the power plant producing the electricity might emit them. To meet the

lower carbon constraints target, commercialization of EV required more attention.

The commercialization of EV had two factors for consideration. One was the new

production of EVs and another one was the retrofitting which was the converting of

existing ICE vehicles to the full EVs. New EV from manufacturer was relatively

expensive in comparison with conventional ICE vehicles as automotive OEM’s were

not going for mass production of new EV due to adaptation issues. Because of the

cost concerns, new production of EV was not getting commercialized as required. At

Page 35: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

16

this stage, retrofitting of existing vehicles to electric drives was a feasible solution

for rapid adaptation of EV as cost and time involved in retrofitting was much lower

than that of new production. Though retrofitting of the vehicle required further

research on the performance of the vehicle in terms of range, infrastructure,

durability and maintenance. But for the time being, concerns regarding vehicle

performance, cost and infrastructure were still vital in case of retrofitting (Chan,

2007, Lixin, 2009).

HEVs eliminated the "range anxiety" associated with Full-EVs, because the

combustion engine could work as a reserve when batteries to be depleted. In these

circumstances, technology, economic context, and environmental issues were all

aligning to create a more commercial backdrop for EVs.

2.2.4 Vehicle System Architecture

The evaluation and determination of vehicle system architecture was

important for the retrofitting of a vehicle. In the case of retrofitting, it was preferable

to avoid modifications of the automobile body or the existing arrangement of other

systems such as brakes and suspension to avoid cost escalation and associated

handling risk. The retrofitting process involved the removal of engine-driven

accessories and the instalment of electric-drive components to replace the drive train.

It was important to check if the existing suspension, brakes system was able to

handle the modified vehicle load after replacing the engine driven accessories. In this

process the vehicle system architecture was required to be evaluated and analysed to

attain the optimum solution for the retrofitting condition. Vehicle system architecture

included vehicle propulsion system, electric motor and controllers, outer dimensions

and power requirement of the vehicle, brakes and suspension system (Islam, 1999).

Previous works focused on the evaluation of electric propulsion system, motors,

outer body dimension etc. though the evaluation based on the retrofitting criteria in

this research was needed.

2.2.4.1 Electric Propulsion System

Electric propulsion system chose the orientation of the drive components in

the vehicle. It selected the quantity of each item, position of them and connecting

Page 36: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

17

diagram of the components. While retrofitting it was very important to select the

position of all EV drive train components because allocation of space required for

each item was the main concern (M. Ehsani; K., 1997). During retrofitting the more

compact the power train selected then the more space could be allocated for batteries

to ensure the maximum range for a single charge. Power train had some design

factors such as, power requirement to propel the vehicle, power to weight ratio of the

motor etc. These factors determined the number of motor required for propulsion

which was very important for the space allocation while retrofitting of the vehicle.

Another significant consideration was the transmission types (direct or indirect

drive). It decided the position of the motor in the power train. It also determined the

requirement of transmission gear and the position of it in the drive train. Depending

on the position of the electric motor, the number of motors and transmission types

(direct or indirect), conventional, by-wheel (direct or indirect drives), in-wheel

(direct or indirect drives) propulsion system were evaluated in many articles (King,

1997, Tseng and Chen, 1997).

Conventional propulsion included the electric motor at the centre with the

transmission system connected to the front and rear axles and the wheels. The power

generated from the motor was transmitted to the drive wheels through the

transmission gear box. Space requirement of conventional propulsion system to

accommodate on board was more than other propulsions because transmission gear

box needs to be installed. One of the disadvantages with conventional propulsion

system was power losses caused during transmission of power to the wheels. In by-

wheel drive train system there were two motors installed one on each wheel as the

motor is fitted by the wheel. In this type each motor ran individually to supply power

and drive wheel. There was less transmission loss found in this system compared to

conventional type propulsion. Advantage of this propulsion system was it did not

require any packaging unlike in-wheel drive train propulsion. In-wheel motor drive

has the maximum torque generation, as the motor was fitted inside the wheel. A

major advantage of in-wheel motors was energy efficiency. Having a motor inside

the wheel reduced losses during power transmission, since the packaging of

gearboxes, differentials and drive shafts became redundant. This simplified design,

thus reduced weight, volume and space. Regenerative breaking could also be

Page 37: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

18

incorporated more effectively as each drive wheel could be operated independently

(Rahman et al., 2006, Caricchi et al., 1994, Rahim et al., 2007, Chung, 2008, Cakir,

2006).

2.2.4.2 Electric Motor

The main component of the EV system was considered its electric motor.

Vehicle operation consisted of three segments: the initial acceleration, driving at

vehicle rated speed, cruising at the maximum speed of the vehicle. These were the

basic design constraint of EV system. While retrofitting, there were some design

variables which needed to be taken under consideration: electric motor power rating,

motor rated speed, size of the motor, motor weight, motor maximum speed,

maintenance requirement, constant power speed range beyond the rated speed etc.

An electric motor was also an important selection criterion for vehicle architecture in

terms of weight, size, efficiency and the power required. Vehicle performance was

mainly depended on the acceleration of the vehicle which was evaluated by the time

required to accelerate from zero speed to a given speed and the highest speed that the

vehicle could reach. In EVs, electric motor delivered the torque to the drive wheels.

Hence, vehicle performance was completely based on the power and efficiency

characteristics of the electric motor. Weight was another crucial consideration in this

case. As the motor was to be mounted inside the wheel, the motor weight became a

significant factor of the un-sprung weight of the retrofitted vehicle. To suit the in-

wheel technology, motor size was also an important consideration. Based on power,

efficiency, cost, weight, size and maintenance requirement, several electric motors

such as the brushed DC motor (BDC Motor), induction motor (IM), Permanent

Magnet (PM) and switched reluctance motor (SRM) were evaluated by many

researchers. For the similar amount of power generation, weight and efficiency of

these motors were focused in comparison. The BDC motor could achieve high torque

at a low speed, which was suitable for the traction requirement and costs less. It

could be wired directly to DC power, which made the controller simple. A 100 KW

BDC motor was typically 75-85% efficient. It weighed about 70 kg, but the power to

weight ratio, maintenance requirements due to brushes and the size of this motor

made it inappropriate for in-wheel technology as it created electromagnetic noises.

Page 38: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

19

IM was an asynchronous AC motor where the shape of the rotor bars determined the

speed-torque characteristics. IM’s were well-known for their low maintenance, lower

cost and durability. The efficiency of a 90-125 KW IM was found around 93-95%

and weight was 40-45 kg. However, it had a low starting torque and its speed was

determined by supply frequency, which made the controller costly. PM possessed a

compact design, long life-span and low maintenance as there were no brushes. PM

motor design required high quality permanent magnets that were expensive and use

rare-earth materials. Use of cheaper permanent magnets led to poor motor

performance, particularly in an automotive environment where extreme ambient

temperatures caused significant variation in magnet strength. A 100 KW PM Motor

was around 88-93% efficient and 30-35 kg weight. The construction of SRM had no

brushes or permanent magnets, and the rotor had no electric currents. Instead, torque

was generated from a slight miss-alignment of poles on the rotor with poles on the

stator. The efficiency of a 100 KW SRM was about 90-92% and the weight was

around 50 kg. In the literature, it was noticeable that the difference among these

motors in terms of different characteristics for the similar power generation (Lee,

2001, Rahman et al., 2000, Ehsani, 1999, Zeraoulia et al., 2006, Terashima et al.,

1997, Xue, 2008, R., 2001).

In-wheel motor system using hall sensor type BLDC motor was developed

and applicability of this on electric vehicle needs performance testing (Chung, 2008).

By early 2000 many research were carried across globe for EV drive trains and in

wheel designs using permanent magnets (Caricchi et al., 1996, Terashima et al.,

1997). Different motors were compared for switched reluctance type and technology

was made available to be extended across to EV technology (Giesselmann, 1996).

Six poles slot less axial-flux PM motor prototype was used in electrical scooter, had

45 Nm peak torque, 6.8 kg active materials weight, and is coupled directly to the

scooter rear wheel (Caricchi et al., 1994, Caricchi et al., 1996). Switch reluctance

motors were developed and prototyped for EV trials. The new developed outer-rotor-

type multipolar SRM was simulated for experiments on suitability for EVs (Goto et

al., 2005). The outer rotor and inner rotor motors were compared in terms of thermal,

dynamic behaviours to evaluate their performance in context of EV technology

(Hennen and De Doncker, 2007). The stem developed included a liquid-cooled axial

Page 39: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

20

flux permanent-magnet designed to meet the direct-drive requirements. Permanent

magnet motor was designed in the form of an axial flux inner stator-non slot type to

use it as compact high torque motor for in wheel direct drive technology (Patel N

(Cypress CA) et al., September 22, 2009 , Rahman et al., 2000). During time many

researchers also focused on analysis and performances of drive trains using computer

aided validations, Matlab etc. (Butler et al., 1999, He et al., 1999, M. Ehsani; K.,

1997, Tseng and Chen, 1997) There were many challenges posing to EVs such as

economically viable and integrated performance of electromechanical parts including

motors, suspensions, brakes etc. A novel axial flux permanent magnet (AFPM)

machine with a Segmented-Armature Torus (SAT) topology was investigated to be

used in EV drive technology (Rahim et al., 2007). Permanent magnet electric vehicle

embodying an axial flux traction motor directly coupled to motors were developed.

Use of transverse flux machine (TFM) for in-wheel motor applications was discussed

by Baserrah (Baserrah et al., 2009). This method compared different TFM based on

FEA results on constraints, such examples would be construction dimensions,

electric and magnetic loading etc. The in-wheel motor developed was composed of

an outer rotor with a rare earth permanent magnet (Sm-Co) and an inner stator. It ran

a maximum speed of 176 km/h a range of 548 km per charge at a constant speed of

40 km/h and acceleration from 0 to 400 m in 18 seconds. Simulation showed that

performance of fuzzy PID controller in steering using two hub motors was better

than non-controller type (Chen et al., 2009).

2.2.4.3 Electric Motor Used in Commercial EVs

The electric motors used by the commercially available EVs were also

considered as a background for choosing the suitable motor in this research. The data

was collected from the vehicle manufacturer’s handbooks. According to data from

the, The Nissan Leaf used an 80 kW (110 HP) and 280 N-m front-

mounted synchronous electric motor driving the front axle. The Tesla Roadster was

powered by a 3-phase, 4-pole, and induction electric motor with a maximum output

power of 185 kW (248 HP). Its maximum torque of 200 lb-ft (270 N-m) was

immediately available and remained constant from 0 to 6,000 rpm; nearly

instantaneous torque was a common design feature of electric motors and offered one

Page 40: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

21

of the biggest performance differences from internal combustion engines. The motor

was air-cooled. The model of 2009 i-MiEV consisted of a single permanent magnet

synchronous motor mounted on the rear axle with a power output of 47 kW and

torque output 180 N-m. The motor was water-cooled and there was a conventional

automobile radiator in the front of the car with an electric fan. The coolant (with

antifreeze) level was monitored via a tank under the rear load platform on the left

hand side of the vehicle.

According to the automobile OEM’s newsletter, the best-known early vehicle

to employ wheel motors was designed by a young ‘Ferdinand Porsche’ in the employ

of coachbuilder Lohner and was known as the Lohner-Porsche Mixte Hybrid. At

Lohner he created two noteworthy vehicles, including the first front-wheel drive

vehicle in history. With time the conventional drive trains gained popularity and hub

motors were mostly disappeared from the landscape until companies such as

Crystallite started putting them in bicycles in more recent times (release). Michelin

displayed an ingenious arrangement of active Wheel’s compact drive motor and

integrated suspension system. Also, Michelin were displaying their increasing range

of low rolling resistance tires. The Active Wheel was a standard wheel that housed a

pair of electric motors. One of the motors spined the wheel and transmitted power to

the ground, while the other acted as an active suspension system to improve comfort,

handling and stability. It had also enabled designers to fit a standard brake disc

between the motors (VIJAYENTHIRAN, May 10, 2008).

2.2.4.4 Evaluation of Existing Vehicle Architectures

Not all types of vehicle parameters were suitable for this retrofitting

procedure. Hence, the evaluation of existing vehicle architectures was significant for

the selection of suitable outer parameter of the vehicle for retrofitting. These

parameters included the engine size, power requirement, torque profile, brakes and

suspension system, outer dimension of the vehicle, total weight of the vehicle, tyre

profile, wheelbase (longitudinal distance between the wheels), track width (lateral

distance between the wheels) etc. The approach was to compare and evaluate the

data collected for different vehicle sectors from the market. Different vehicle sectors

were defined in market research based on their size, kerb weight and power rating

Page 41: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

22

(Nakano-cho, 2008). Mostly small vehicle sector concluded the hatch-back models;

medium vehicle sector concluded the sedan models.

In small sized vehicles, Hyundai Getz 1.6 SX Hatch-Back, Holden Barina

Spark CDX 1.2 Hatch-Back, Ford Fiesta 1.4 Hatch-Back, Toyota Yaris YRS/YR 1.5

Hatch-Back, Suzuki Swift 1.6 Hatch-Back were very promising according to the

market research in terms of power rating, tyre profile and kerb weight of the vehicle.

Maximum small vehicles had the kerb weight of around 1000 kg. Most of the

vehicles had ventilated disc brakes at front and drum brakes at rear. In case of

suspension system in small vehicles, Macpherson struts at front and torsion or twist

beam coil spring at rear for most of the vehicles were commonly used. Outer

dimension of the vehicle were in the range of 3.5 – 4 m in length, 1.5 – 1.7 m in

width and 1.4 -1.6 m in height. Advantages of using small latest vehicles would be

light weight structure and inclusion of latest technologies. Using medium size

vehicles was advantageous in some instances such as space availability for packaging

of motor, batteries and other ancillaries associated with it. Models considered for

evaluation procedures in mid-size vehicles were Hyundai Sonata, Mazda 6, Toyota

Camry, Suzuki SX4 and Holden Cruze. Maximum medium vehicles had the kerb

weight of around 1500 kg. Most of the vehicles have ventilated disc brakes at front

and solid disc at rear. In case of suspension system in small vehicles, Macpherson

struts at front and torsion or twist beam coil spring at rear for most of the vehicles

were the most common options, though there were some vehicles with multi-link

anti-roll bar at rear suspension. Outer dimension of the vehicle were in the range of 4

– 4.9 m in length, 1.7 – 1.9 m in width and 1.4 -1.6 m in height. Small SUVs were

not any different to medium size vehicles in total weight. However they were more

powered than medium vehicles which could not be identified till prototypes would be

built to evaluate SUV with in wheel design concepts. Nissan Dualis, Hyundai I35

were few possible SUVs to be modified to EV drive trains. Maximum SUVs had the

kerb weight of around 1550 kg. Most of the vehicles had ventilated disc brakes at

front and solid disc at rear. In case of suspension system in small vehicles,

Macpherson struts at front and multi-link anti-roll bar at rear suspension were

commonly used. Outer dimension of the vehicle were in the range of 4.3 – 4.6 m in

length, 1.7 – 1.9 m in width and 1.6 -1.7 m in height. Like medium vehicle sector,

Page 42: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

23

more space allocation for wheel would be attained with small SUV sector, but power

requirement and weight of vehicle were not suitable for in wheel motor packaging

requirement at this point in time. All the data was collected from the corresponding

vehicle manufacturer’s web page.

2.2.4.5 Brake System

Braking system of the vehicle was another concern for retrofitting, since the

weight of the vehicle would go up during the conversion. The braking system of the

vehicle needed to be reliable for the added weight of the vehicle. Especially the

thermodynamic behaviour of the disc brakes in an operating condition was analysed

in previous literatures (Zetterstram, 2002). Many researchers have used FEA (Finite

element analysis) techniques to obtain the stress, thermal strain of the disc brakes. In

many researches, simplified model of disc brakes were used avoiding the variation of

contact pressure and temperature with time. Some researchers simplified the disc

geometry by modelling only the disc applying the rotational velocity on it. It was

also shown in previous research that brake pad also undergoes thermal deformation

and temperature distribution along the disc is not uniform. But some researchers also

simplified the analysis of the thermal behaviour of the brake system by taking only

the disc under CAD geometry consideration. There were some mathematical models

as example Lagrangian approach to simulate the frictional heating of the disc brakes

with rotational speed relative to the brake pads which could help getting the realistic

analysis results. But considering the high computational time and resources due to

the simultaneous execution of thermodynamic and mechanical analysis, some

literatures considered the disc brake as a solid with a given operating condition to

check the deformation, stress and thermal strain through the analysis (Jerhamre,

2001. , Kubota, 2000, Giorgetti., November 28 2000., Koetniyom, 2000, Weichert.,

2003). The thermal and structural coupling was studied in previous literature for the

ventilated disc rotor and pad. Mechanical stress and thermal stress were obtained and

compared to verify the module coupling in ANSYS (Ali Belhocine, 2013).

2.2.4.6 Suspension System

Suspension system was also an important concern with the increment of total

weight of the vehicle and the position change of the significant weight items of the

Page 43: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

24

vehicle. Currently many suspension systems were used in automotive engineering

which could support vehicle dynamics by dependent and independent ways. Among

the available types of suspension systems such as traverse leaf spring, molten rubber

suspensions, multi-link systems, the McPherson Strut has been the most popular

because of its light weight and compact size. Previously many studies were

accomplished considering the suspension model consisting of control arm, tie rod,

spindle, piston rod, coil spring, damper and the road model including camber,

roughness of the road-surface. In some research, the Macpherson suspension was

modelled and the FEA was carried out for assessing the deformation of the different

components of the suspension system. Some researches were to estimate the dynamic

parameter of the suspension. Some researchers considered the specific manoeuvring

condition and varied the roll centre to get the kinematic behaviour of different

components of the suspension system in different road models. Some employed the

displacement matrix method to analyse the system behaviour and a comprehensive

kinematical and dynamic analysis of the Macpherson strut suspension system (Y. I.

Ryu1, 2010, M. S. FALLAH, 2008).

2.3 Vehicle Dynamic Analysis The vehicle dynamic characteristic of the vehicle was considered primarily

governed by the centre of gravity (CG) and the polar moment of inertia, which was

regulated by the placement of the EV components along longitudinal, lateral and

vertical directions. The tendency of the vehicle towards different dynamic

characteristics in different manoeuvring conditions such as acceleration, braking,

cornering was studied in many researches. Some research focused on different

variables such as side-slip, tire forces to improve the vehicle safety, handling and

comfort. Some research was based on analysing the stability of the vehicle in sudden

manoeuvre which is very essential to prevent the road accidents. Vehicle

performance was also based on the road friction magnitude. The potential trajectories

of the vehicle were studied in some researches to obtain the better management of

vehicle control system and electronic stability controller (ESC). Some researchers

approached towards the modelling of vehicle based on different software. The

Page 44: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

25

modelling of a road vehicle was found very complex. To simplify the model some

researchers avoided the road model and different features of the road surface and

environment such as camber angle, wind speed, wind direction etc. (Frendo, 2007,

Rajamani, 2006, Gillespie, February 1992).

The dynamic behaviour of the vehicle depending on the longitudinal motion

was studied by many researchers. According to the literature review, the longitudinal

vehicle motion was governed by the forces acting on the vehicle such as longitudinal

tyre forces, rolling resistance, forces due to the gravitation, aerodynamic drag etc. In

some models, the road inclination angle was considered zero to simplify the vector

calculation of the forces. To get the magnitude of longitudinal tyre forces, some used

the experimental data. In some cases, the simulation results data obtained from the

sensors were used to model the effect of the forces acting on the vehicle (Gillespie,

February 1992).

Some studies were accomplished to describe the characteristics of ground

vehicle in terms of performance handling and ride. The tendency of the vehicle to

overcome the obstacle on the road at a fast driving condition and to continue the

vehicle motion against the external disturbances was denoted as the performance

characteristics. The ride characteristics were defined as the road-tyre interface

friction and its impact on the passenger and goods on the vehicle. Handling

characteristics were defined by the response of the vehicle towards the driver’s input

to the steering, accelerators and brakes. The relationship of these characteristics was

also discussed in some articles as the driver’s usual reaction to the accelerators and

brakes and vehicle reaction to the road obstacles regulating the handling and stability

condition of the vehicle (Frendo, 2007).

2.3.1 Configuration of tyres

Previous research concentrated on the pneumatic tyres used for road vehicles

as it served the requirement of performance, handling and riding quality of the

vehicle. The two basic concerns of the mechanics of the tyres were analysed in the

literature that the mechanics of the tyres on hard and deformable surfaces such as on

the gravel road. Different types of tyre construction to serve the requirements of

vehicle riding and handling were also discussed in some research such as bias ply

Page 45: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

26

tyres, radial ply tyres and carcass ply tyres. With the change in constructions types,

the tyre response of rolling resistance, overturing moments, tractive force, lateral and

normal force, aligning torque of the vehicle towards the direction of wheel travel

changed. The magnitude of the slip angle developed in the tyre also differs with the

difference in tyre profile (Müller, 2002, Sylvain DETALLE, 1997).

2.3.2 Road Surface Friction

The tyre road surface friction was studied in some articles (Müller et al.,

2003, Pasterkamp and Pacejka, 1997, Rajamani et al., 2010, Shim and Margolis,

2004, Wang et al., 2004). The texture of different types of pavement surface such as

polished concrete, new concrete, rolled asphalt with mixed aggregate rounded in

different states like coarse, medium or medium-coarse and asphalt with coarse seat

coat according to the society of automotive engineers (SAE). Inflation pressure of the

tyre was considered in some research as the significant factor for the calculation of

rolling resistance and the flexibility of the tyre. The deflection of the tyre under

different condition of the vehicle was also depended on the inflation pressure. The

deflection of the tyre controlled the movement of the tread elements and the contact

patch area at the static and dynamic loaded condition. Temperature effect on the

running condition of the tyre was discussed in the literature as the temperature has a

great impact on the coefficient of rolling resistance. SAE research concentrated on

the complex relationship between the design and operational parameter of the tyre

and its rolling resistance. The basic intention was to keep the rolling resistance as

low as possible, but the tyre endurance, life were also significant considerations.

SAE recommends the procedures of calculating rolling resistance for different types

of tyres in different road surfaces according to the SAE handbook. Based on the

experimental data, many empirical formulas were proposed to calculate the rolling

resistance coefficient depending on the velocity of the vehicle. Analysing different

methods, the velocity range was set for different passenger vehicles. Literature

review referred that in the initial stage of the vehicle performance calculations, the

velocity was assumed to be ignored and the value of rolling resistance coefficient

was established for different operating condition of the vehicle as given in

Automotive Handbook, 4th edition, Bosch.

Page 46: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

27

The height of the point of application of the aerodynamic resistance was

calculated in different articles and considered to formulate the equation of vehicle

motion. This point was denoted as haero in the textbook on vehicle dynamics

(Rajamani, 2006).

2.3.3 Aerodynamic Drag

The aerodynamic drag coefficient was discussed in different articles. Drag

coefficient was considered in many researches as varied with the value of vehicle

speed, flow direction and fluid properties such as density and viscosity. According to

the fluid flow theory, for streamlined body the aerodynamic drag coefficient can be

reduced. The aerodynamic body shape for the vehicle was studied in many

researches to reduce the drag coefficient. From the experimental results in the wind

tunnel, the drag coefficient for the different vehicle shapes and types were formed

according to the automotive handbooks. The frontal area calculation was also

proposed in some research. For the passenger vehicle, the frontal area varies in the

range of 79-84% of the area calculated from the overall vehicle width and height.

Based on the data collected for the passenger vehicles with the mass range of 800-

2000 kg the empirical formula was developed in the literature (Rajamani, 2006,

Rajamani et al., 2010, Wei et al., 2014, Xu et al., 2014).

2.3.4 Vehicle Model and Simulation

Vehicle dynamic estimation has been done in different literatures. Some

researchers were focused on vehicle and road modelling simultaneously and some

researchers presented the dynamic behaviour of the vehicle separately in vehicle-

body dynamics and road-vehicle interface modelling to simplify the complexity of

modelling road and vehicle body together. They calculated the dynamic

characteristics of the vehicle such as longitudinal and lateral forces; slip angles, side-

slip etc. Some studies carried out to obtain the effect of cornering stiffness on the

dynamic behaviour of the vehicle. They applied the mathematical model based on

Kalman Filter estimation and used different sensors integrated in modern road-

vehicles to measure yaw rate, longitudinal-lateral accelerations, steering angle and

angular wheel velocities (Doumiati et al., 2012). Some literature proposed tyre-force

Page 47: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

28

model which can accommodate the magnitude of the road-friction as variable so that

the vehicle model could work for different road surface condition (Gillespie,

February 1992, Rajamani, 2006, Rajamani et al., 2010).

The distribution of weight in the vehicle was a very significant factor for the

location of CG of the vehicle. Literature explained that the front and rear weight

distribution determined the position of longitudinal position of CG and left-right

weight distribution determined the lateral position of CG. The ratio of load

distribution regulated the tendency of the vehicle towards different handling

characteristics of the vehicle such as under-steering, over-steering etc. In some

literature, it was shown that in critical speed cornering the formula car faces different

lap time for different load distribution. The lateral acceleration was also varied with

the weight distribution of the vehicle when maximum speed cornering was

performed in a driving simulator (Chen, 2014, Ramirez Ruiz and Cheli, 2014, Zhang

et al., 2014, Milleville-Pennel, 2008). The movement of the load between inside and

outside wheels during the critical cornering was measured and compared for different

weight distribution. The mathematical model displayed the amount of lateral load

transfer depended upon the cornering force, the CG height and the track width of the

vehicle. Lowering the CG would decrease the load transfer between inside and

outside wheels during cornering. And widening the track width of the vehicle would

decrease the load transfer of the vehicle. When a vehicle turned at a corner, the

lateral force generated was found at the contact patch of the wheel. As the CG of the

vehicle located above the ground, it required the outside wheel to carry more load

than the inside to balance the extra torque generated due to the forces on the vehicle.

According to the theory the tyre grip to the road surface increased with the increment

of the lateral load transfer of the vehicle. But after reaching to a certain level of load

transfer the tyre grip started to drop which was considered as a very critical situation

for the dynamics of the vehicle (Chen et al., 2012, Doumiati et al., 2009).

Some literatures focused on the estimation of the roll angle and the one-side

lateral load transfer with the calculation of the vertical forces on the wheels by

instrumenting the model vehicle with some sensors. They tested the concept with the

prototype of the model vehicle in the lab. The prototype vehicle was used as a

demonstration of the theoretical approach with the comparison of the simulation

Page 48: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

29

results with the experimental data. The problem of describing the understeer-

oversteer behaviour of a general vehicle, such as one with locked differential or

tandem rear axle, was addressed taking a new perspective. The well-known handling

diagram and the associated classical understeer gradient might be inadequate, mainly

because they were no longer unique. The new concept of handling surface and a new

definition of understeer gradient, which was indeed the gradient of the handling

surface and a vector, were presented. It was also shown how the new concepts were

related to and generalize the classical ones. Finally, a procedure for the experimental

measure of the new understeer gradient was outlined (Frendo, 2007, Sharp and Dodu,

2004).

Previous research referred that the polar moment of the vehicle is a very

important factor for the stability and handling of the vehicle. The polar moment was

considered dependent on the mass, momentum and the force applied at a distance

from the centre of the vehicle. Literature revealed that the polar moment varied with

the turning intention of the vehicle when the direction changes with varying the load

and its position in the vehicle. If the load on the vehicle was far from the centre of

rotation the polar moment increased. The magnitude of polar moment regulated the

response time of the vehicle to the changes in steering (Akiyama et al., 1987, Dvorak

and Fitzhorn, 2008, Marqués-Bruna, 2011).

The radius of the curvature path and the trajectory of the vehicle were very

significant in dynamic analysis. Previous work on computing the curvature path of

vehicle referred that several mathematical models were analysed to compute the

optimal path for the vehicle. But there were so many assumptions such as vehicle

moving only forward, turning fully right or fully left etc. The mathematical model

showed that the radius of curvature path varies with the CG position, steering angle,

total mass, turning speed of the vehicle and the cornering stiffness of the wheels

(Frendo, 2007, Rajamani, 2006).

The measurement of tyre longitudinal slip and the lateral slip angle were

taken under considered in many researches for vehicle dynamic control system.

Literature review focused on different approaches to control the slip and slip angles.

Some research was based on estimating vehicle dynamic states and self-aligning

moment relies on a tyre model. The research presented the model of a vehicle body

Page 49: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

30

independent of the tyre slip controller to avoid the complicacy of the control design.

Some research proposed the estimation model of tyre side slip angle based on the

relationship with lateral acceleration, yaw rate and velocity of the vehicle

independent of steering angle input. Literature review showed that at large slip angle,

the impact of the steering angle on the yaw rate of the vehicle. The yaw control

system gave different behaviour of the vehicle in different road friction magnitudes.

The limit of vehicle slip angles varied from the dry and snowy roads with different

friction coefficient. Many researchers used yaw control approach for simulating

vehicle dynamic behaviour by lowering the vehicle slip angle (Fukada, 1999,

Guillaume Baffet 2009, Gustafsson, 1997, Gustafsson, 1998, Junmin Wang, 2006,

Lee et al., 2004, Li et al., 2007, Takeshi Iijima, April 2010, You et al., 2009).

2.3.5 Tyre Model for longitudinal, lateral and normal forces

Previous literature developed a number of tyre models which were relating

the tyre forces with the tyre deflections simulate lateral dynamics of the vehicle.

These models were to demonstrate the physical properties, elastic deformation in

terms of control design of the vehicle and lateral forces and slip angles of the tyre

under specific criteria. Among these models, the magic formula tyre model and the

Dugoff’s tyre model were well-known in simulating vehicle dynamic characteristics.

Many researchers focused on the programming these models according to the vehicle

dynamic analysis requirement. Literature showed the parameter of the tyre model

could be altered to verify with the specific condition of the vehicle dynamic

behaviour. Some researchers established the tyre model by coupling the Michelin

magic formula adapting the low velocity of the vehicle, significant loads and high

side slip angles. Some researchers used dynamic friction model adapting the Lugre

model to simulate the road/tyre interaction for ground vehicles. They focused on the

traction control system which enhanced the stability and controllability of the vehicle

in low tyre friction situation by reducing the tyre slipping and sliding during vehicle

acceleration. Some literatures focused on the magic formula for the tyre modelling

which was based on the length and width of the contact patch in loaded condition of

the tyre. Front and rear slip of the tyre was also considered in this magic formula (Li

et al., 2007, Lidner, 1992, Müller, 2002, Sylvain DETALLE, 1997).

Page 50: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

31

Previous research developed and tested a "slip-based" method to estimate the

maximum available tire-road friction during braking. The method was based on the

hypothesis that the low-slip, parts of the slip curve used during normal driving could

be able to indicate the maximum tire-road friction coefficient. Experimental results

were collected to support the hypothesis. The friction estimation algorithm used data

from short braking with peak accelerations of 3.9 m/s 2 to classify the road surface as

either dry or wet. Significant measurement noise made it difficult to detect the subtle

effect being measured, leading to a misclassification rate of 20% (Pasterkamp and

Pacejka, 1997).

The relationship between the slip angle and the cornering force on the tyre

was investigated extensively in different literatures. The cornering stiffness of the

tyre varies with the normal load acting on the tyre. From the experimental results, the

value for cornering and the longitudinal stiffness of the tyre were found in different

operating conditions of the vehicle. The research referred that the cornering forces

acting on the tyre was proportional to the slip angle generated. The lateral load

transferred from the inside to the outside tyres during cornering of the vehicle

reduces the total cornering force that a pair of tyres can develop. Stiffness also

depends on the inflation pressure of the tyre according to the literature (Bakker et al.,

1987, Bevly et al., 2006, Peng and Tomizuka, 1990, Sienel, 1997). Damping

coefficient was also an important factor for the vehicle dynamic analysis which was

based on the inflation pressure and the speed of the vehicle. The damping effect of

the tyre was a significant factor for the efficiency of the suspension system for the

unsprung mass of the vehicle. The damping of a pneumatic tyre depends on the

material properties of the tyre. But the damping coefficient was calculated for

different tyre and road condition from the experimental results of drop test (Chen et

al., 2014, Tong and Hou, 2014, Warczek et al., 2014).

2.4 Structural Safety Analysis of Battery Packaging 2.4.1 EV Batteries

It was predicted in the previous research that EVs would be going to lead the

automobile market and the battery was considered as the key to this revolutionary

Page 51: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

32

change. EV batteries were different from the industrial ones and the laptop and cell-

phones batteries. The main concern with EV batteries was handling high power (up

to a hundred KW) and high energy capacity within a narrow space and weight. The

price of the batteries was also an important factor as the commercialization of EV to

the mass market is subjected to the cost issues associated with it (Burke, 2007, Chalk

and Miller, 2006, Jung et al., 2012). Different technologies have been used for EV

batteries since last 20 years of EV development. Various chemistries for the batteries

were studied previously for the EVs. The market research focused on the use of

different batteries for EV propulsion such as Using Li-Ion for GM Chevy-Volt, Ford

Escape PHEV, Chrysler 200C EV, BMW Mini E (2012), BYD China E6, Daimler

Benz Smart EV (2010), Mitsubishi IMEV (2010), Nissan Leaf EV (2010), Tesla

Roadster (2009), Think Norway EV etc. and Ni-MH for GM Saturn Vue Hybrid,

Ford Escape Fusion MKZ HEV, Toyota Prius, Honda Civic Insight, BMW X6,

Daimler Benz ML450 S400, Nissan Altima etc. For the higher specific energy and

energy density with required space constraints, the adoption of Li-ion batteries was

growing fast in case of BEVs as discussed in the literature. The most preferred type

of battery used for electric vehicles was li-ion due to its high energy to weight ratio,

high voltage and good stability. Literature review showed that li-ion batteries had a

slow rate of discharge while not in use. The commercial EVs used li-ion batteries for

powering EV drive train (Kennedy et al., 2000, Matthe et al., 2011, Will, 1996).

The required configuration of the EV battery depended on the propulsion

power required by the vehicle. The powertrain of an EV was required providing

power in all road conditions and driving modes. EVs also needed to consider the

regenerative braking so that the kinetic energy of the moving vehicle could be stored

and applied for future use. The power required to serve for the driving of the vehicle

was determined from the product of propulsion force depending on the vehicle

weight, aerodynamic drag, wind velocity, rolling resistance and the velocity of the

vehicle. The road condition such flat or inclined road was an important factor for

calculating the power required for the vehicle to drive. Average power required for

the vehicle to accelerate and brake up to a given range was found as defined in the

vehicle manual. It could be noticed from the data that the power required for braking

was more than that of accelerating the vehicle because the deceleration might happen

Page 52: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

33

in a very shorter period of time and in a distance as short possible. The EV battery

required meeting the demand of supplying the power at the driving condition and

storing the energy at the same time. According to the US urban dynamometer driving

schedule, typical energy consumption of a mid-sized vehicle for urban driving is 165

wh/Km and 137 wh/km for highway. However, there were many more factors for

this energy consumption rating such as the vehicle weight, size, aerodynamic shape

of the body, the driver’s input etc. According to the data obtained from the literature

the gasoline had a theoretical specific energy of 13000 wh/kg which was over 100

times higher than the Li-ion batteries (120 wh/kg). To generate the similar amount of

specific energy the required battery pack to propel the vehicle would be of huge

weight and high volume which would not be very practical. Some researchers

considered the energy efficiency of the internal combustion engine propulsion and

the electric propulsion as the electric propulsion is much more efficient than ICE.

From the experimental data, some researchers applied the energy requirement of the

electric propulsion would be 80% of the ICE propulsion and the energy storing

capacity of the electric propulsion system would be one-fourth of the regular ICE

propulsion for the same mileage (Hcdrich et al., 2008, Stockar et al., 2010).

2.4.2 Batteries Used in Commercial EVs

According to the market research data provided by the vehicle manufacturers,

the typical energy required for a vehicle to drive a mile ranges from 0.25 kWh (GM’s

EV-1) to 0.30 (GM’s Volt) and 0.33 kWh (Tesla’s Roadstar). As an example

calculation, a 200-l (50 gallons) battery pack with an energy density of 230 Wh/l

stored 46 kWh of energy and travelled 200 miles between charges. Another factor,

power density, was important for acceleration and for the collection of regenerative

energy from braking. The battery pack mentioned above, assuming a discharge

power density of 460 W/l, can generate 92 kW (123 hp), which was acceptable for a

typical passenger vehicle. The 24 kWh battery pack in the Nissan Leaf consisted of

48 modules and each module contains four cells, a total of 192 cells, and was

assembled by Automotive Energy Supply Corporation (AESC). Tesla Motors

referred to the Roadster's battery pack as the Energy Storage System or ESS. The

ESS contained 6,831 lithium ion cells arranged into 11 "sheets" connected in series;

Page 53: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

34

each sheet contained 9 "bricks" connected in series; each "brick" contained 69 cells

connected in parallel (11S 9S 69P). Tesla focused a great deal of effort on the safety

of the battery pack through both its engineering as well as its industry involvement.

In the Mitsubishi i-MiEV the 16 kwh lithium-ion battery pack consisted of 88 cells

placed under the base floor. The pack had 22 cell modules connected in series at a

nominal voltage of 330 V. There were two 4-cell modules placed vertically at the

centre of the pack and ten 8-cell modules placed horizontally. The entire pack had a

specific energy 80 wh/kg.

Different materials for the EV applications were studied in many researches.

The Li-ion battery cathode and anode material was compared and mentioned

different properties for those. LiCoO2 with 160 mAh/g specific capacity and 3.7V

voltage were mostly used in consumer products; good capacity and cycle life with

high cost and unsafe in case of high charging rate. LiMn2O4 (130 mAh/g specific

capacity and 4V voltage) were commonly used in automobile with low cost and

acceptable rate capability, but poor cycle of life and durability. LiFePO4 (140 mAh/g

specific capacity and 3.3V voltage) included low cost, improved abuse tolerance,

good cycle life and power capability, but low capacity and durability (Bruce et al.,

2008, Kang and Ceder, 2009, Scrosati and Garche, 2010).

As described in the report of US-China battery workshop based on energy

efficiency and renewable energy organized by US department of energy (DOE),

battery affordability and performances were critical advances that were needed in

order to achieve the EV everywhere grand challenge. The workshop categorized the

commercial EVs by the battery configuration and the price associated with it. The

Chevy volt included 40 miles electric range HEV (32 mpg/300 miles; 16 kwh/120

kw battery) and the cost of the battery around $8000. The Nissan Leaf comprised 75

miles electric range and more than 24 kwh/ 80 kw battery with $12000 cost. The

Tesla Roadster included 250 miles electric range with 85 kwh/ 270 kw battery which

was around $35000.

2.4.1 Packaging of EV Batteries

The design of the packaging arrangement of the battery was modelled in

different automobile project. The conceptual design approach was implemented in

Page 54: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

35

preparing the design model. According to the description stated in different

researches, the conceptual design consisted of the understanding the root problem

addressed by the requirements, identifying and exploring a broad range of alternative

solutions based on the requirements, evaluating the alternative solutions and

combining the best aspects of each and selecting a combination of alternatives

considering the design constraints. The Nissan Leaf's design located the battery, the

heaviest part of any EV, below the seats and rear foot space, keeping the centre of

gravity as low as possible and increasing structural rigidity compared to a

conventional five-door hatchback (Loing, 2009).

To test the reliability and durability of the battery packaging arrangement

design, Finite Element Analysis (FEA) has been used widely in engineering. Some

researchers worked on the reliable design and test procedure to guarantee the service

length under the operating conditions and full functioning of the product. According

to the literature the crucial part of the FEA was determining the magnitude of load

acting on the structure. And if the load would be a function of time with the

operating temperature of the structure the FEA would be considered as the

complicated analysis. Some researchers simplified the analysis at the design

geometry and some researchers simplified the analysis by making the assumptions at

the analysis settings such as ambient temperature, independence with time factor, the

magnitude of load as an arbitrary value (Chan et al., 2006, Krein et al., 1994, Loing,

2009, Peters, 2000).

To perform the analysis of the structure at real time environment, some

researchers analysed the vehicle safety at a crash situation. Now-a-days crash

simulation of a vehicle has become an important safety analysis tool for automobile

industry to shorten the time to market and lower the vehicle manufacturing cost. The

battery electric vehicles have possessed a great dependency in terms of safety of the

passenger during the crash due to the huge battery on board. LS-DYNA has been a

well-accepted non-linear dynamic analysis program developed by Livermore

Software Technology Corporation (LSTC) integrated with ANSYS (Takezono, 2000,

Wriggers, 2006). It has been able to analyse large deformation behaviour in

structures by the explicit time integration method and vehicle crash can be modelled

in it to check the safety features of different components of the vehicle. In the LS-

Page 55: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

36

DYNA model, the vehicle has been divided into lots of nodes and elements. The

behaviour of the vehicle, forces, displacements and stress developed at each node

and element of the vehicle could be calculated from the K-file generated by the

model in ANSYS mechanical APDL product launcher. The crash simulation of the

vehicle has been widely used for simulating the safety features installed in the

vehicle such as air-bags, seat-belts etc. Dummies at the position of passenger were

placed to check the safety during crash along with the action of safety features.

Vehicle crash could be simulated in different ways according to the literature. The

safety of the vehicle could be checked in a frontal impact situation when colliding

with an obstacle (rigid wall), in a collision with another vehicle or in a side impact

situation when colliding with a rigid obstacle or a moving vehicle during lane

changing (Bathe, 1998, Baykasoglu et al., 2012, Kirkpatrick et al., 1999, Zhang et

al., 2009).

2.4.2 Analysis of Battery Packaging Design

The use of structural analysis in checking the feasibility of the structure for a

given amount of load from a defined direction was applied in different types of

complex engineering design according to the literature. Failure analysis was also

used for different structures to reduce the stress concentration in case of different

materials. Some researchers applied different conditions such as repetitive load,

moving load, sudden change of temperature, change of temperature with time steps

etc. The design structures were analysed including the deformation, stress and

thermal strain which presented the actual loaded condition of the design. In the CAD

geometry, the direction of load applied was considered very crucial for the analysis

results. Research has been done analysing the failure mechanism of the Li-Ion

battery when small internal short circuit spots generated in the separator in a

controllable and repetitive manner. Deformation developed in the separator was

measured by the FEA analysis model. The deformation of different structures was

also calculated by considering different material such as aluminium alloy. Several

modelling approaches including flow stress-strain curves, the equation model and

processing map were used to characterize the deformation found in the structural

analysis. In some cases, the torsion has been applied to obtain the thermal-

Page 56: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

37

mechanical behaviour of the structure under pure tension and compression. Some

researchers investigated the deformation due to the change of thermal expansion

coefficient in the analysis and compared the relationship between thermal expansion

and the equivalent Von-Mises stress of the structure (Tremblay and Dessaint, 2009,

Yang and Knickle, 2002).

2.5 Battery Cooling System & Thermal Analysis The state of charge (SOC) was considered as the critical condition parameter

for the battery health which was based on the load current and the operating

temperature of the battery. Accurate gauging of the battery SOC was found critical to

know when to stop charging the battery. Literature referred to the state of health of

the battery based on the operating temperature. When it came to batteries for electric

vehicles, the thermal management system that ensured batteries operate within a

certain temperature range would be crucial to helping electric vehicles drive greater

distances for a longer period of time. If batteries were to have a long service life,

overheating must be avoided. According to the literature, a battery’s comfort zone

lied between 20°C and 35°C. But driving in the mid-day heat of summer in Australia

would push a battery’s temperature beyond that range. The damage caused could be

crucial. Literature referred that operating a battery at a temperature of 45°C instead

of 35°C halved its service life. Temperature affected the operation of the

electrochemical system, round trip efficiency, charge acceptance, power, energy,

safety, reliability, life and life cycle cost of the battery. The thermal management was

needed for the battery pack to regulate the desired operating temperature range for

optimum performance, reduced uneven distribution of temperature in the cell of the

battery and eliminated the potential hazards related to uncontrolled temperature. That

is why it was found important to keep them cool. According to the literature, the

capacitor modules for EVs were subjected to heavy duty cycling conditions and

therefore significant heat generation occurs. High temperature caused accelerated

aging of the double layer capacitors and hence reduced lifetime. To investigate

the thermal behaviour of double layer capacitors, thermal measurements during

charge/discharge cycles were performed in previous research. These measurements

Page 57: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

38

showed that heat generation in double layer capacitors was the superposition of an

irreversible Joule heat generation and a reversible heat generation caused by a

change in entropy (Schiffer, 2006, Bennion and Kelly, 2009, Chu, 2009, Zolot et al.,

2001).

2.5.1 Air and Water Cooling System

Thus far, air cooled conventional cooling systems had not yet reached to its

full potential as found in previous literature. There were two types of thermal control

using air ventilation, one was active air-cooling another was passive air cooling.

Passive air-cooling process was very simple as the outside air passed through the

battery pack and exhausted from the pack using a fan. There was another way to

form a passive air cooling system. The outside air would be passed through an

installed vehicle cooler or heater cores and the cooled air entered into a cabin where

the battery pack was placed. The hot air was then taken away by the exhaust fan and

passed it to the cabin air again. If the exhausted air could be totally moved out from

the system and always the outside air could be used for cooling of the battery then

the system could be denoted as the active air cooling system. The efficiency of the

active system was more than the passive system. But air could absorb only very little

heat and was also a poor conductor of it. Moreover, air cooling required big spaces

between the battery’s cells to allow sufficient fresh air to circulate between them

(Fan et al., 2013, Park, 2013).

The liquid-cooling systems were still under research and development.

Though their thermal capacity exceeded that of air-cooling systems and they were

better at conducting away heat. According to the National Renewable Energy

Laboratory report, there were three types of thermal control using liquid circulation.

Those are: passive, moderate active and active cooling system. In the passive

cooling system, the liquid coolant was pumped to the battery pack after passing

through the heat exchanger in the outside air with exhaust fan. In the moderate active

cooling, after flowing through the battery pack the cooling liquid was pumped to the

liquid heat exchanger where the general vehicle engine coolant was applied for

cooling. After the heat exchanging process, the liquid coolant returned to the battery

pack again. In the active cooling system, the coolant passed through a dual stage heat

Page 58: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

39

exchanger. At the first stage, vehicle engine coolant was in use for moderate cooling.

At the second stage, an AC heat exchanger was in use with either air from evaporator

or refrigerant from the condenser. The active cooling system with AC heat exchanger

was found more efficient than the others. But the downside of the liquid cooling

system was the limited supply of liquid in the system compared with the essentially

limitless amount of air that can flow through a battery. Another backdrop of the

liquid cooling over the air-cooled system was the cooling media could be used

directly in case of air cooling as air did not have any chemical reaction or electrical

hazard with the battery whereas liquid coolant needs to be jacketed to avoid the

electrical hazards (Sabbah, 2008, Kandlikar and Hayner, 2009, Kevala, 1990, Yeow

et al., 2012).

2.5.2 Cooling System Used in Commercial EVs

The Nissan Leaf was powered by a 24 kilowatt-hours lithium ion battery pack

rated to deliver up to 90 kilowatts (120 hp) power. The pack contained air-cooled,

stacked laminated battery cells with lithium manganate cathodes. The battery and

control module together weighed 300 kg and the specific energy of the cells was

140 Wh/kg. Tesla motors used liquid cooling system for the battery pack of the

Roadster model. A fully charged ESS stored approximately 53 kWh of electrical

energy at a nominal 375 volts and weighed 992 lb (450 kg). The pack was designed

to prevent catastrophic cell failures from propagating to adjacent cells (thermal

runaway), even when the cooling system was off. Coolant was pumped continuously

through the ESS both when the vehicle was running and when the car was turned off

if the pack retained more than a 90% charge. The coolant pump drew 146 watts.

Appropriate cell temperature levels were maintained by a proprietary liquid-cooling

system which included sensors within the pack monitored by the battery management

system of the vehicle. Liquid coolant was pumped through the pack to enable

effective heat transfer to and from each cell. The cooling system was so effective that

the cells on opposite sides of the battery pack stay within a few degrees of each

other. This was important for maximizing battery life, optimizing performance and

safety. In the Mitsubishi i-MiEV the battery had a forced air cooling system to

prevent overheating during high charge and discharge rates and consequent damage.

Page 59: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

40

There was an integral fan in the battery pack. For rapid charging, the battery pack

was additionally cooled with refrigerated air from the air conditioning system of the

vehicle. General Motors for its Volt and Ford’s line of hybrids and EVs selected to

use liquid for battery temperature regulation. Coda Automotive, meanwhile, used an

air cooling system for its Coda Sedan.

2.5.3 Use of PCM as Cooling Material

As the cooling material suitable for the automotive battery, the phase change

material (PCM) was also considered in some research. Battery thermal management

using PCM had potential to bring benefits, such as passively buffering against life-

reducing high battery operating temperatures according to the report by National

Renewable Energy Laboratory, US. 18650 Li-Ion cells were surrounded by a high-

conductivity graphite ‘sponge’ that was saturated by a PCM (‘wax’). The matrix held

the PCM in direct contact with the cells, and the latent heat capacity to melt the PCM

was intended to absorb the waste heat rejected by the cells during periods of

intensive use. The advantages found from the research were reduced peak

temperature, better uniformity of the temperature and reduced system volume. And

the backdrops found were the heat accumulation, additional weight of the system and

undesirable thermal inertia (Pesaran, Dec 2-5, 2007). The thermal conductivity of

paraffin wax was increased by two orders of magnitude by impregnating porous

graphite matrices with the paraffin. The graphite matrices were fabricated by

compacting flake graphite that had been soaked in a bath of sulphuric and nitric acid

then heat-treated at 900 °C. The properties of the graphite matrix and paraffin phase

change material (PCM) composites were measured for graphite matrix bulk densities

ranging from 50 g/L to 350 g/L. The properties studied included

the thermal conductivity in directions parallel and perpendicular to the direction of

compaction, paraffin mass fraction, and the latent heat of fusion of the composite

samples (Mills, 2006). The effectiveness of passive cooling by PCM was compared

with that of active (forced air) cooling in previous literature. Numerical simulations

were performed at different discharge rates, operating temperatures and ambient

temperatures of a compact Li-ion battery pack suitable for plug-in hybrid electric

vehicle (PHEV) propulsion. The results were also compared with experimental

Page 60: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

41

results. The PCM cooling mode used a micro-composite graphite-PCM matrix

surrounding the array of cells, while the active cooling mode used air blown through

the gaps between the cells in the same array. The results showed that at stressful

conditions, i.e. at high discharge rates and at high operating or ambient temperatures

(for example 40-45 °C), air-cooling was not a proper thermal management system to

keep the temperature of the cell in the desirable operating range without expending

significant fan power. On the other hand, the passive cooling system was able to

meet the operating range requirements under these same stressful conditions without

the need for additional fan power (Sabbah, 2008, Kizilel, 2009, Mills, 2005, Al-

Hallaj, 2002).

2.5.4 Thermal Management of Batteries

The cooling system was analysed in many literatures for different solid

structures. When the temperature of the solid was dependent on the temperature of

the fluid, the fluid solid interface analysis was applied by many researchers (Chen et

al., 2005, Gu and Wang, 2000, Pals and Newman, 1995, Srinivasan and Wang,

2003). In case of lithium ion batteries, many researchers analysed the interface

between the electrode and the separator. The electrolytes were considered as the

interface for this analysis (Lee, 2014). Electrochemical properties of the graphite

anode and the LiFePO4 cathode, working together with the 1 M LiPF6 in TMS

(sulphone) at 90°C were studied. The general aim of the investigation was to

demonstrate a potential application for a Li-ion cell working in the cooling system of

a vehicle heat engine (90°C) (Lewandowski, 2014). Research was done exploring the

use of heat pipe as cooling device for a specific HEV lithium-ion battery module.

The evaporator blocks of heat pipe modules were fixed to a copper plate which

played the role of the battery cooling wall. A flat heater was glued to the other

surface of the copper plate and reproduced heat generated by the battery. The

temperature at the cooper plate/heater interface corresponded to that of

the battery module wall (Tran, 2014). Battery thermal management system for BEVs

based on the impact of climate both directly on the battery temperature and indirectly

through the loads of cabin was studied. The findings of the study was the primary

challenge to cold-climate BEV operation to be inefficient cabin heating systems, and

Page 61: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

42

to hot-climate BEV operation to be high peak on-road battery temperatures and

extreme degradation of the battery. Active cooling systems appeared necessary to

manage peak battery temperatures of aggressive, hot-climate drivers, which could

then be employed to maximize thru-life vehicle utility (Neubauer, 2014, Bandhauer,

2011).

3D thermal model has been developed in previous research to examine

the thermal behaviour of a lithium-ion battery. The model considered the layered-

structure of the cell stacks, the case of a battery pack, and the gap between both

elements to achieve a comprehensive analysis. Both location-dependent convection

and radiation were adopted at boundaries to reflect different heat dissipation

performances on all surfaces (Chen, 2005). Mathematical modelling of heat

generation and transport in lithium/polymer-electrolyte batteries for electric vehicle

applications has been conducted in the previous research. Under high discharge rates

of the battery, the thermal management system was considered as very crucial

because the temperature of a battery might increase remarkably under the

consideration of the thickness of a cell stack exceeding a certain value. Also, due to

the low thermal conductivity of the battery material, the improvement of cooling

conditions was not an effective means of improving heat removal for large-stack

systems. For a required operational temperature range and a given discharge rate,

model predictions could be used to design appropriate battery structures and to

choose a suitable cooling arrangement (Chen, 1993, Al-Hallaj, 2002, Chen, 2005,

Esfahanian et al., 2013, Lee, 2014, Lewandowski, 2014, Ng and Dubljevic, 2012,

Schiffer, 2006).

The previous research investigated consequences of integrating PHEVs in a

wind-thermal power system supplied by one-fourth of wind power and three-fourth

of thermal generation. Four different PHEV integration strategies, with different

impacts on the total electric load profile, have been investigated. The study showed

that PHEVs could reduce the CO2-emissions from the power system if actively

integrated, whereas a passive approach to PHEV integration was likely to result in an

increase in emissions compared to a power system without PHEV load. The

reduction in emissions under active PHEV integration strategies was due to a

reduction in emissions related to thermal plant start-ups and part load operation.

Page 62: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

43

Emissions of the power sector were reduced with up to 4.7% compared to a system

without PHEVs, according to the simulations. Allocating this emission reduction to

the PHEV electricity consumption only, and assuming that the vehicles in electric

mode was about 3 times as energy efficient as standard gasoline operation, total

emissions from PHEVs would be less than half the emissions of a standard car, when

running in electric mode. The previous research indicated that

the thermal management of traction battery systems for electrical-drive vehicles

directly affected vehicle dynamic performance, long-term durability and cost of

the battery systems. In the literature, the battery thermal management method using a

reciprocating air flow for cylindrical Li-ion cells was numerically analysed using a

two-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model and a lumped-

capacitance thermal model for battery cells and a flow network model.

The battery heat generation was approximated by uniform volumetric joule and

reversible (entropic) losses. The results of the CFD model were validated with the

experimental results of in-line tube-bank systems which approximates the battery cell

arrangement considered for this study. The numerical results showed that the

reciprocating flow can reduce the cell temperature difference of the battery system

by about 4 °C (72% reduction) and the maximum cell temperature by 1.5 °C for a

reciprocation period. Such temperature improvement attributed to the heat

redistribution and disturbance of the boundary layers on the formed on the cells due

to the periodic flow reversal. (Göransson, 2010, Mahamud, 2011).

The efficiency of the cooling system was investigated in the previous

research using CFD analysis for the coolant liquid. There different methods of using

CFD to analyse the flow of the fluid. In some research the fluid flow in dynamic

condition with the velocity, acceleration and turbulence was investigated. In some

cases, the fluid flow analysis was simplified by analysing it in the static condition. In

case of air-cooled system, the flow was considered as non-linear in cascades and

analysed by using a harmonic balance technique (Blazek, 2005, Munson, 1994).

Page 63: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

44

2.6 Retrofitting of EVs A battery electric vehicle was developed by converting a VW Lupo 3L.

Researchers were trying to optimize the energy storing capacity of the vehicle with

the consideration of the vehicle weight. The original VW Lupo was compared to the

BEV Lupo in terms of the vehicle performance in this research (I.J.M. Besselink,

2010). MESDEA 200-200W water cooled AC induction motor (24 kW nominal/50

kW peak) and MESDEA TIM 600W water cooled inverter (80 to 400 V, 236 A

nominal/400 A peak) were installed in this EV conversion centrally with the Carraro

fixed ratio reduction (8.654:1) for the transmission.

University of California, San Diego developed a conversion design of an

internal combustion engine to an electric vehicle powered by batteries comprises

many steps from choosing the vehicle, sizing a motor, and the type of batteries. This

project takes a 1980 Datsun 280zx and converts it to an all-electric car with DC

motor and lead acid batteries. The power steering and power assist are reused as well

as air conditioning components (California, 2009).

Solar Electrical Vehicles has developed a prototype PV Prius to help answer

that question. The PV Prius is fitted with a custom moulded fiberglass photovoltaic

module. Solar Electrical Vehicles has applied for a patent on the PV Prius solar

system. The photovoltaic module is rated at 215 watts at AM 1.5. The module is

connected to a DC-DC converter and peak power tracker. The output of the converter

is directly connected to the primary motive Ni-Mh battery. The feasibility of

installing an aftermarket photovoltaic module on a Toyota Prius has been shown. The

economic return from the conversion of a stock Prius to a PV Prius is dependent

upon the nominal daily trip length, the price of gasoline required to operate the

gasoline engine, actual fuel efficiency of the gasoline engine, the number of Wh/mile

and the number of Wh provided by the solar module (Edward J. Simburger, 2006).

At the Karlsruher Institute of Technology (KIT) a vehicle was converted for

full battery electric drive. The converted vehicle consists mainly of one electric

motor with water cooled power electronics that drives the front axle, 21 battery

modules controlled and managed by the battery management system, one on board

charging device and an universal control unit (Müller-Glaser).

Page 64: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

45

2.7 Findings Many researchers studied the conversion of EVs from the combustion engine

vehicles. In previous studies, brakes, suspension systems, electronic stability

controllers, different electric motors for power, different motor controlling approach,

different battery chemistries and configuration were studied and analysed in case of

conversion of EVs. Different architectural layouts based on the load distribution of

the vehicle were not studied in terms of dynamic analysis, providing the solution for

the battery packaging arrangement and the cooling efficiency of the battery pack.

Several automotive manufacturing companies developed the battery packaging

considering the distribution of heavy weight to get the balanced dynamic stability of

the vehicle, though the vehicle was not designed for retrofitting. The new production

design can have the flexibility of modifying the chassis of the vehicle as required.

The escalation of cost does not allow the retrofitting process to modify the chassis or

the main body of the vehicle. Therefore, the initial load distribution thus the

architectural layout was focused in this research to obtain a balanced system for

retrofitting of EVs.

Page 65: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

46

CHAPTER 3

RETROFITTED ARCHITECTURAL

LAYOUT

In case of EV conversion, it is required to select a suitable vehicle parameter

and drive train system to obtain better performance from the retrofitted EV. It was

found in previous literature that modification of the automobile body or the existing

arrangement of other systems such as brakes and suspension cause cost escalation

and associated handling risk as discussed in 2.2.4. The retrofitting process involved

the removal of engine-driven accessories and the instalment of electric-drive

components to replace the drive train. It is important to check if the existing

suspension, brakes system is able to handle the modified vehicle load after replacing

the engine driven accessories. In this chapter, the vehicle system architecture was

evaluated and analysed to attain the optimum solution for the retrofitting condition.

Vehicle system architecture included vehicle propulsion system, electric motor and

controllers, outer dimensions and power requirement of the vehicle, brakes and

suspension system. The main objective of this chapter is to find a suitable existing

vehicle parameter to apply different load distribution layouts for vehicle dynamic

analysis in case of retrofitting.

To study all the aspects of retrofitting, the architectural layout of the vehicle

needed to be designed. Load distribution of the vehicle in both longitudinal and

lateral direction was determined by the architectural layout of the vehicle.

Architectural layout included the placement of different drive train components on

board. Hence, drive train components consist of battery pack, electric motor and

motor controllers. Architectural layout also determined the weight concentration of

the vehicle. The weight concentration of the vehicle was the significant factor in

determining polar moment which was considered as an important dynamic

Page 66: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

47

characteristic of the vehicle. Another vehicle dynamic characteristic centre of gravity

also depended on the architectural layout of the vehicle. To select the architectural

layout with best dynamic results, different layouts were designed and modelled using

SolidWorks.

To select the suitable system architecture for retrofitted EV this system

architecture components required to be evaluated. Electric propulsion system chose

the orientation of the drive components in the vehicle. It selected the quantity of each

item, position of them and connecting diagram of the components. While retrofitting

it was very important to select the position of all EV drive train components because

allocation of space required for each item was the main concern.

The main component of the EV system was considered as the electric motor.

Vehicle operation consisted of three segments: the initial acceleration, driving at

vehicle rated speed, cruising at the maximum speed of the vehicle. These were the

basic design constraint of EV system according to the literature review. While

retrofitting, there were some design variables which needed to be taken under

consideration: electric motor power rating, motor rated speed, size of the motor,

motor weight, motor maximum speed, maintenance requirement, constant power

speed range beyond the rated speed etc. Considering these design variables, a review

study was accomplished in this research to evaluate different electric motors.

According to the literature, it was noticeable that all types of vehicle

parameters could not be suitable for the retrofitting. The data collected from the

automobile market focused on the detail parameter of the vehicle in different sector

based on the vehicle size. These data was used for evaluation and a suitable

parameter was optimized to place the EV propulsion components on the retrofitted

vehicle.

3.1 EV Propulsion System Selection During retrofitting the more compact the power train selected then the more

space could be allocated for batteries to ensure the maximum range for a single

charge. Power train had some design factors such as, power requirement to propel the

vehicle, power to weight ratio of the motor etc. These factors determined the number

Page 67: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

48

of motor required for propulsion which was very important for the space allocation

while retrofitting of the vehicle. Another significant consideration was the

transmission types (direct or indirect drive). It decided the position of the motor in

the power train. It also determined the requirement of transmission gear and the

position of it in the drive train. According to the literature review (2.2.4.1) based on

the position of the electric motor, the number of motors and transmission types

(direct or indirect), conventional, by-wheel and in-wheel propulsion system were

evaluated and compared in this study for the selection of the suitable system (Cakir

and Sabanovic, 2006, Rahman et al., 2006). A comparison based on different

considerations among these propulsion systems has been demonstrated in Table 3-1.

Table 3-1: Comparison of three EV propulsion systems

By comparing conventional, by-wheel and in-wheel propulsion system, it was

noticeable that in context of placement of the motor in the propulsion diagram,

conventional system was the most suitable choice. But when installation of

Criteria Conventional By-Wheel In-Wheel

Diagram

Connection Complicated Simple Simplest

Transmission

power loss High Low No Loss

Packaging Cost Low High Highest

Space Savings Low High Highest

Motor Packaging

Arrangement Simple Simple Complicated

Weight Impact Sprung Un-sprung

Un-sprung:

Concentrated on

Wheels

MOTOR

MOTOR MOTOR

Page 68: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

49

transmission gear boxes, drive shafts were considered, conventional propulsion was

found to occupy space more than others. By-wheel propulsion was more appropriate

than others in terms of lower transmission loss accompanied with lower cost of

packaging the motor beside the drive wheels. But the space occupied by the motors

and packaging arrangements could be used to accommodate more battery units on

board to get maximum range possible whereas in-wheel system allowed this space.

Though in case of in-wheel propulsion, packaging of the motor inside wheel

increased the un-sprung weight of the vehicle which was a significant function of

vehicle suspension design and the construction materials used in suspension

components. High un-sprung weight also exacerbated wheel control issues under

hard acceleration or braking manoeuvre. Road surface imperfections escalated the

impact of un-sprung weight on vibration absorption of the wheels.

In this research, in-wheel technology was chosen to be used to allow more

space for other EV components. However, an in-wheel system needed to consider

packaging of the wheel-motor, making it more complex than the by-wheel system. In

the in-wheel system, as the wheel was getting heavier with a motor, an appropriate

packaging solution was required to be integrated that could accommodate the

weather protection and vehicle stability due to the high un-sprung weight.

3.2 Electric Motor Selection An electric motor was also an important selection criterion for vehicle

architecture in terms of weight, size, efficiency and the power required. Vehicle

performance mainly depended on the acceleration of the vehicle which was evaluated

by the time required to accelerate from zero speed to a given speed and the highest

speed that the vehicle could reach. In EVs, electric motor was to deliver the torque to

the drive wheels. Here, vehicle performance completely depended on the power and

efficiency characteristics of the electric motor. Weight was another crucial

consideration in this case. As the motor was to be mounted inside the wheel, the

motor weight became a significant factor of the un-sprung weight of the retrofitted

vehicle (Ehsani, 1996, Xue, 2008).

Page 69: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

50

To suit the in-wheel technology, motor size was also an important

consideration. Based on power, efficiency, cost, weight, size and maintenance

requirement, several electric motors such as the brushed DC motor (BDC Motor),

induction motor (IM), Permanent Magnet (PM) and switched reluctance motor

(SRM) was compared in this research in terms of the data found from the previous

literature (2.2.4.2 and 2.2.4.3). For the similar amount of power generation, weight

and efficiency of these motors were focused in comparison. Figure 3-1 demonstrated

these differences of these motors. All collected data were for 100 KW motors.

Figure 3-1: Comparison based on weight and efficiency of 100 KW motors

According to Figure 3-1, PM provided maximum efficiency with the

minimum motor weight for 100 KW power. Considering all these characteristics

following weighted comparison model has been generated in order to obtain the most

appropriate choice for this application.

BDC IM PM SRM

Weight (Kg) 70 42 30 50

Efficiency (%) 80 93 92 90

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Page 70: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

51

Table 3-2: Comparison model of different electric motors

Criteria Scale BDC IM PM SRM

Weight 1-10 9 8 5 7

Cost 1-10 5 7 9 7

Size 1-10 9 8 6 7

Maintenance 1-10 9 8 8 8

Motor selection criteria were chosen as weight, cost, size, maintenance and

efficiency of the motor. Comparison model was built based on weighted ranking

method. Ranking range was from 1 to 10 where “1-4” was considered as poor, “5-7”

as average and “8-10” as high. However manufacturing costs favoured SRM over

PM’s as discussed in 2.2.4.2. The SRM used a smaller air-gap than the PM motor,

but magnet cost more than compensated for this. According to Table 3-2 comparison

model based on the literature review, the PM was found as the best choice for EV

applications in terms of size, efficiency and power to weight ratio and maintenance

even though cost and availability of permanent magnets were of concern. In this

research, permanent magnet brushless DC motors was chosen.

3.3 Vehicle Selection Vehicle specification was an important aspect of this design optimization

study. The vehicle was required to have enough space to accommodate the batteries

and control systems and the wheel motor was to be fitted with ease. As the weight

and size of the motor is proportional to its generated power, vehicle weight and

wheel size became very significant. The evaluation of existing vehicle specifications

was based on required power and torque, vehicle weight and wheel size with

mudguard clearance. In order to choose suitable specifications, vehicle data was

compared considering power, torque, tyre specification, vehicle outer dimension,

kerb weight, wheelbase, etc (I.J.M. Besselink, 2010).

Data from different sized vehicles were collected and studied in literature

review section 2.2.4.4. The evaluation were based on power required, weight and

mudguard clearance specifications (Wheel size). Considering weight, wheel size and

Page 71: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

52

maximum power required, TOYOTA YARIS, SUZUKI SWIFT, HOLDEN CRUZE,

TOYOTA CAMRY ATTARA S and MAZDA 6 were compared in Table 3-3.

Table 3-3: Comparison of Different Vehicle Parameter (data collected from industry)

Engine Size

TOYOTA YARIS

1.5L Hatch

SUZUKI SWIFT

1.6L Hatch

HOLDEN CRUZE

2L Sedan

TOYOTA CAMRY

ATTARA S 2.4L

Sedan

MAZDA 6 2.5L

Sedan

Vehicle Size

L/W/H

3785/ 1695/ 1530

3765/ 1690/ 1510

4597/ 1788/ 1477

4815/ 1820/ 1480

4735/ 1795/ 1440

Wheel Base (mm)

2460 2390 2685 2775 2725

Weight (kg) 1045 1090 1522 1460 1471

Max power KW@ rpm

80@ 6000

92@ 6800

110@ 4000

117@ 6700

125@ 6000

Max Torque Nm@ rpm

141@ 4200

148@ 4800

320@ 2000

215@ 4000

225@ 4000

Tyre 185/60 HR15

195/50 R16

215/50 VR17;7.0J

215/60 VR16;6.5J

205/60 VR16;6.0J

Suspension System

MacPherson struts at

front, torsion beam, coil springs at

rear

MacPherson struts at front, Twist-beam at

rear

MacPherson struts at

front, multi-link at rear

MacPherson struts at front

and rear.

Double wishbone at Front, multi-link at rear

Brake Type

Front ventilated

disc brakes. Rear drum

Front ventilated disc brakes. Rear

drum

4 wheel disc brakes. Front

ventilated

Front Ventilated disc, Rear Solid disc

Front Ventilated disc, Rear Solid disc

Advantages of using small latest vehicle would be light weight structure,

inclusion of latest technologies. Small sized vehicles were found more promising

with Suzuki Swift sports or Toyota Yaris newer models. It was also considered that

old model of small vehicles did not have provisions for intended space requirements

for 17” wheels. Another advantage of small vehicles was less power requirement.

The data provided by the vehicle manufacturers showed that the maximum power at

Page 72: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

53

a given RPM for small vehicles was lower than the medium sized vehicles. Medium

sized vehicles were considerable including Holden Cruze and Toyota Camry models

with latest technologies and light structured as compared to other models. In case of

medium size vehicles, more space could be achieved for in-wheel motor packaging,

but main disadvantage with this segment was power requirement higher than small

vehicles.

In-wheel motor technology required a larger wheel size and a larger clearance

between tyre and mudguard (M., 2011). Many vehicles came with a standard 16”

wheel diameter as shown in Table 3-3, which could be increased by a maximum of

2” according to the tyre and rim design regulations (Manual, 2012). An 18” wheel

diameter could accommodate a compact in-wheel PM motor. Holden Cruze had

wheel size R17 which could be increased to 19” according to the regulations. But the

torque requirement and vehicle weight was much higher. Therefore, Toyota CAMRY

Attara S 2012 model with tyre size R16 (~R18 with extension), weight 1460 kg and

maximum required torque 215 Nm at 4000 rpm was chosen for this study.

Removed weight of engine driven accessories and added weight of EV

system components determined the total weight of the retrofitted vehicle. First, it

required to specify the items to be removed from the vehicle. Engine, gearbox,

alternator, battery, radiator, hydraulic braking system was considered as the main

significant items at the front bay of the vehicle. Among these components, the

radiator was decided not to be removed so that it could be used in cooling

arrangement of the EV battery pack. And hydraulic braking system installed in the

existing vehicle was chosen to be kept same to avoid the cost escalation. As a result,

engine, gear box, alternator and battery were the removing items from the existing

vehicle. The weights of these items were measured practically from the vehicle,

Toyota Camry 2.4L Sedan which was provided in Table 3-4. Battery, motor and

controllers were also considered as added weights in the replacement of engine and

engine driven accessories. Table 3-4 below showed the selected vehicle specification

for analysis and the removed / added weight redistribution during retrofitting of the

EV.

Page 73: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

54

Table 3-4: Vehicle specification and parameters for Toyota Camry Attara S

Vehicle Parameter & Specification

Vehicle Weight (kg) 1460 Length (mm) 4815

Retrofitted Weight (kg) 1710 Width (mm) 1820

Wheelbase (mm) 2775 Tyre R18

Track Width (mm) 1400 Ground Clearance(mm) 130

Wheel Weight (kg) 25 Height (mm) 1480

Weight Redistribution (Retrofitting)

Removed Items Weight (kg) Added Items Weight (kg)

Engine 140 Battery 330

Gear Box & Alternator 20 Motors (2) 60

Battery

10

Motor Controllers

30

3.4 Brake System Analysis Braking system for EV drive train was an important issue as weight, cost and

space required to package was a challenge. The brake analysis was done to verify the

existing brakes would be able to provide braking for the increased weight of the

vehicle. In the analysis thermal condition is also considered to obtain a stable result.

In the selected vehicle Toyota Camry Attara S 2012 model has disc brakes at

both front and rear wheels. Disc brake system was designed to take kinetic energy

and transferred it into heat energy. This heat energy was created by the driver by the

pressing of the brake pedal. The force was then converted into hydraulic pressure

which forced the piston to move inside the calliper. The piston movement forced the

brake pads in contact with the spinning disc. Friction between the brake pads and the

brake rotor generated heat which was then dissipated by hot air rising from the

surface of the disc (convection) into the atmosphere. Disc was the crucial part of the

braking system which absorbs the brake force applied by the vehicle. The magnitude

Page 74: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

55

of brake pressure depends on the road conditions, velocity and loading condition of

the vehicle etc. as discussed in section 2.2.4.5.

3.4.1 FE Model details

The FE model contains the thermal input data in the structural analysis of the

brake disc. As the thermal input, heat flux, radiation and the convection data were

used. The FE mesh was generated using three-dimensional tetrahedral element. The

number of mesh nodes was 5003 and mesh elements was 2495. The smoothing of the

mesh was defined medium. The rigid body behaviour of the model was

dimensionally reduced. The coordinate system was defined as global.

3.4.2 Boundary conditions and input data for the analysis

The numerical simulation based on coupled static thermal-structural method

in ANSYS software was accomplished to analyse the brake disc of the existing brake

system. The parameter of brake application used for the analysis is given in the Table

3-5.

Table 3-5: Parameter used in the analysis

Disc Diameter 296 mm

Disc Thickness 28 mm

Vehicle mass 2010 kg

Rate distribution of the braking forces (Front/Rear) 55/45

The disc material used in the analysis was Grey Cast Iron. The thermo-

mechanical properties used in the analysis is given in Table 3-6. Toyota Camry

Attara has the front ventilated disc and rear solid disc. In this analysis, solid rear disc

with 25% proportion of brake pressure distribution was applied. The amount of

pressure distribution on both front and rear disc would be variable based on the

tunning of the proportioning valve. Brake force was calculated considering the

vehicle speed 110 km/hr. (30.55 m/s) and stopping time of the vehicle was 10 sec.

For the retrofitted vehicle weight 2010 kg the total brake force was calculated as

6140 N. As the rear wheels received 45% of the total brake forces, the amount of

Page 75: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

56

brake forces at rear became 2763 N and each rear wheel received 1381.5 N brake

forces for the given condition. Now by calculating the vector components of the

forces, the resultant force, F acting on the rear disc was determined from the equation

below,

(3.1)

where, F = Force acting on the disc

= Force acting on the wheel = 1381.5 N = Radius of the tyre = 0.4572 m = Radius of the disc = 0.148 m 

The force on the rear disc was calculated as 4267.7 N. The Pressure on the

brake pad was calculated using the force per unit area and the area of the brake pad

found from the CAD model was 0.00216 m2. The pressure was calculated as 0.969

MPa. In the static structural analysis, the hydraulic pressure applied on the brake pad

was 1 MPa.

Table 3-6: Thermo-mechanical properties of the disc material

Thermal Conductivity 52 (W m^-1 C^-1)

Density 7200 (kg m^-3)

Specific heat 460 (J/kg. °C)

Poisson’s ratio 25%

Coefficient of Thermal Expansion 1.1E-05 (C^-1)

Young's Modulus 1.1e+11 (Pa)

Angular velocity 157.89 (rad/s)

Hydraulic pressure 1 (MPa)

The initial temperature of the disc was 22ºC and the surface convection

condition was applied at all surfaces of the disc. Input data in static thermal analysis

module are shown in Figure 3-2.

Page 76: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

57

Figure 3-2: Thermal load input data for the analysis

To obtain total deformation and the equivalent stress of the disc the static

thermal model was coupled with static structural module and the input data were as

shown in Figure 3-3.

Figure 3-3: Boundary conditions and load applied on the disc

Page 77: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

58

3.4.1 Results and discussion

Figure 3-4 shows the thermal and elastic deformation of the disc. The

magnitude of the deformation varies from 0 to 0.2705 mm. The value of the

maximum deformation was recorded during the end of simulation at t=1 s. which

corresponded to the time of braking. This deformation depends on the specific heat

capacity of the material and the temperature generation of the disc in operating

condition. With the given magnitude of heat flux, convection and radiation for the

operating condition, the maximum temperature generated was 265.45ºC.

Figure 3-4: Total deformation found in the disc due to both the thermal and elastic load

Figure 3-5 presents the equivalent Von-Mises stress and the thermal strain

generated considering both thermal and elastic loading in the disc at the given

condition. The stress value varied from 0 to 533 MPa. The maximum value of the

stress was recorded at time t=1 s. The significant observation of the stress profile

would be a strong constraint near the brake pad of the disc. The maximum thermal

strain was recorded as 0.001 mm/mm which was observed in the area of applied heat

flux.

Page 78: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

59

Figure 3-5: Von-Mises stress and thermal strain generated under the effect of thermal and elastic load

in the disc

The brake force was calculated considering an ideal condition of driving

where no slip or dynamic factors were counted. The analysis results showed that the

static thermal and structural module was fully coupled for the disc rotor and no

significant displacement or distortion was observed in the results which can affect

the safe operating condition of the disc rotor for the change of vehicle weight.

3.5 Suspension System Analysis Suspension system of the vehicle was another important design consideration.

If the existing suspension was required to be replaced or modified during retrofitting

the cost was going to escalate. This analysis was done to check the durability of the

coil spring under the effect of added weight of the vehicle. Total deformation was

analysed and compared with theoretical calculation of the maximum failure range of

the existing spring to verify the design constraint of keeping the existing suspension

for the retrofitted vehicle. System element of existing suspension was analysed to

validate the use of it after retrofitting of the vehicle as the added weight due to the

retrofitting was 250 kg. Current suspension system for Toyota Camry Attara S Sedan

included independent, MacPherson struts, coil springs and ball-joint mounted anti-

roll bar at front and independent, MacPherson struts, coil springs, dual lower

transverse links, lower trailing arm, Gas dampers and ball joint-mounted anti-roll at

Page 79: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

60

rear. Table 3-7 presented the dimensions of coil spring and strut damper of the

existing suspension.

Table 3-7: Properties of the spring and damper

Coil spring

Coil spring wire diameter 14 mm

Coil spring outer diameter 146 mm

Free length 338 mm

Spring constant 3.85 Kg/mm

Effective turns 5

Strut damper

Piston rod diameter 22 mm

Piston diameter 36 mm

Stroke 200 mm

Analysis based on changing weight due to retrofit of the vehicle was carried

out using ANSYS. Analysis indicated that there was 250 kg increase in vehicle mass

due to addition of EV batteries and other electronic drive components. Current

suspension system was 14 mm by 146 mm with MacPherson strut. To get the force

load active on the suspension system for analysis, the weight of driver and passenger

were taken under consideration. The retrofitted vehicle weight was as 1710 kg.

Considering driver and passenger weight of 300 kg, a force load of 1005 kg (half of

total weight 2010 kg) was applied in the negative y direction from the top to

compress the spring. Current front and rear suspension includes 4 coil springs in the

vehicle. The total weight was meant to be divided into 4 portions. The magnitude of

load experienced by the spring in the dynamic condition was regulated by the road-

surface friction and the load distribution of the vehicle. To analyse the worst possible

condition half of the vehicle weight on one coil spring was used as the force load.

The spring was meshed with 10-node tetrahedrons using a global side length of 5

mm. With all the loads and fixed support applied and mesh completed, the material

Page 80: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

61

properties were selected to be linear, elastic and isotropic. A modulus of elasticity of

30x106 psi (2109 kg/mm2) and Poisson’s ratio of 0.3 were inserted. Analysis showed

maximum deformation of the spring (Figure 3-6) for the estimated vehicle load was

125 mm and maximum stress developed was 492 Mpa as shown in Figure 3-7.

Figure 3-6: Total deformation (elastic) of the spring

Now according to the Hooke’s Law,

F = KX (3.2)

where, F = Force needed to extend or compress a spring = 1005 kg K= Spring Constant = 3.85 kg/mm X = Displacement of the spring due to the force F

From the equation the displacement of the spring was calculated as 261 mm

which was more than the actual displacement of the spring due to the load. Analysis

results indicated suitable performance with safety of more than 2 times with

increased load on vehicle.

Page 81: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

62

Figure 3-7: Normal stress of the spring

3.6 Battery Packaging Placement of EV drive train components in the vehicle the suitable and

enough space were required to be selected. Suitable space was needed to be arranged

by modifying the automobile body or chassis in some cases. But as retrofitting

involved with the cost reducing agenda for the growing EV industry, modification of

automobile body and chassis were meant to be avoided.

In terms of space to fit in the drive train following options of places were

taken under consideration:

Front engine bay (Bonnet),

Rear boot,

Mid area under the passenger seat of the vehicle,

Drive wheels (In-wheel Propulsion),

Spare wheel bay,

Fuel Tank space.

Page 82: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

63

3.6.1 Selection of suitable places in the vehicle

The front engine bay or bonnet of the vehicle would be empty after removing

engine, gear box, alternator and battery. This space could be utilized to accommodate

EV drive train components. It had the weather protection. Drive train components

only required the mounting arrangement in the front bay. If the battery pack was

placed in the front bay, the radiator could be used for the cooling arrangement of the

pack. It had another advantage that this set up would simplify the piping arrangement

for the cooling system and reduced the cost of that.

Choice of rear boot space would compromise the luggage capacity of the

vehicle. On the other hand, the space was well protected from weather. Placing

electronic device would be safe from rain water in this space. With the rear boot

there was a space in the spare wheel carrier. In the in-wheel propulsion system for

the front-wheel drive (FWD) vehicle spare wheel would be only for the rear wheels.

If the spare wheel could be fit in the carrier at the back of the vehicle, the spare

wheel bay could be used to place the motor controllers.

The mid area of the vehicle was a good choice for the handling and stability

of the vehicle in dynamic condition as this space was close to the centre of gravity of

the vehicle. At the mid area of the space was under the passenger seat close to the

ground. In this way, the weight of the placing items would move down the vertical

centre of gravity of the vehicle which was preferable for the balancing of the vehicle

in dynamic condition specially in cornering dynamics. Another advantage of this

space was during retrofitting the fuel tank could be removed. Toyota Camry 2.4L

sedan had 70 litre fuel capacities. There would be a suitable space to place EV

components after removing the fuel tank.

For the in-wheel propulsion system, the drive wheels could be considered as

the spaces to fit in the electric motor inside. Selected vehicle Toyota Camry 2.4L

sedan had front wheel drive system. To keep the existing steering system set up drive

wheel was decided to be front drive. Two permanent magnet brushless DC motor

were decided to be fitted inside the front drive wheels.

EV components that need to be packaged in the vehicle during retrofitting

were mainly Battery pack, electric motor and motor controllers. There were three

possible spaces to place these three components in the vehicle which were front

Page 83: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

64

bonnet, mid area of the vehicle under the passenger seats occupying fuel tank space,

the rear boot accompanied with the spare wheel space and front wheels. Motors were

to be inside the front wheels. In this situation, battery pack and the motor controllers

could be placed in front, mid and rear space of the vehicle. As the battery pack was

of 330 kg, this weight was the significant factor of determining the load condition of

the retrofitted vehicle.

3.7 CAD model of the load distribution layouts Based on three options of spaces in the vehicle to place the battery packs and

motor controllers three architectural layouts of the vehicle were chosen for the

analysis. These three architectural layouts presented three load distributions of the

retrofitted vehicle. The CAD models were generated to demonstrate the placing of

EV drive train components on the selected vehicle. Considering front (bonnet), mid

(under the passenger seats) and rear (boot) space of the vehicle, three architectural

layouts was suggested to be evaluated through the dynamic analysis. Those are:

1. Front-loaded Layout

2. Mid-loaded Layout

3. Rear-loaded Layout

3.7.1 Geometry Considerations for the CAD Model

In CAD model, the basic dimensions of the vehicle maintained as Toyota

Camry Attara S 2012 model. Basic dimensions included chassis with wheel-base,

track width, wheel size and ground clearance of the vehicle. The outer automobile

body was modelled using surface geometry. The shape of the outer body was not

modelled according to the existing vehicle to avoid the exhaustive representation of

the surface geometry and keep it simple only for demonstration purpose. After

modelling the chassis by maintaining the basic dimensions of length width and

height, the exterior panels were modelled by simplifying the detail enormously. The

detailed surfaces needed to define their contour, including the gaps between different

panels of the body surface or identify the rigid and moving parts (automobile doors)

or metal body and glasses. The interior arrangement of the vehicle was also

Page 84: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

65

simplified by modelling only 2 seats with the dashboard. As the CAD model was to

demonstrate the placing arrangement of the EV components, simplified model was

adopted. The chassis, dashboard with seats, bonnet, main automobile body, door,

hood, battery pack, wheel, drive shafts, and motor controllers were designed

separately in part modelling and then assembled together.

3.7.2 Front Loaded Layout (Case I)

Front loaded layout demonstrated the major portion of the vehicle load at the

front. The removed weight from the vehicle during retrofitting was 170 kg and the

added weight was 420 kg. So, the extra weight added due to the retrofitting of the

vehicle was 250 kg. The major portion of this extra weight was the weight of the

battery pack. If the battery pack was placed in the front bay, it presented the major

load at the front side of the vehicle. The front-loaded layout was designed

accommodating the battery pack in the front bay, the control unit in the rear boot

keeping the spare wheel in the existing way, and the motor inside the front wheel as

shown in Figure 3-8. In this load distribution layout, the luggage space in the rear

boot was compromised due to the placement of the motor controller as shown in

Figure 3-8.

Figure 3-8: Front-loaded Layout

Battery

Motor Front

Rear

Motor

Controller

Page 85: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

66

3.7.1 Mid Loaded Layout (Case II)

Mid-loaded layout accommodated the battery pack at the mid area under the

passenger seats as shown in Figure 3-9.

Figure 3-9: Mid-loaded Layout

As the size of the battery pack was large, placing it under the passenger seats

can cause the discomfort to the passengers. That’s why the fuel tank was removed

from the existing vehicle so that battery pack could be placed comfortably in there.

The motor controller was placed in the spare wheel space and the motor inside the

front wheel as the front loaded layout. In case II layout, the luggage space in the rear

boot was kept empty.

3.7.1 Rear Loaded Layout (Case III)

A significant change in the rear-loaded layout was the battery pack in the rear

boot space of the vehicle and controller in the front bay (Figure 3-10).

Battery

Front

Rear

Motor

Motor

Controller

Page 86: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

67

Figure 3-10: Rear Loaded Layout

In case III layout, as the battery pack was placed in the rear boot, the luggage

capacity was compromised. The motors were placed inside the front wheel as other

architectural layout of the vehicle. In this layout, the space in front bay was not

utilized properly.

3.8 Load distribution of the vehicle Load distribution of the vehicle was important in improving vehicle

performance in terms of safe handling and stability. It was one of the dependencies

of locating the centre of gravity (CG) position in the vehicle. Architectural

orientation of the vehicle determined the load distribution of a vehicle. Placement of

components along longitudinal, lateral and vertical direction of the vehicle regulates

the load distribution ratio of the vehicle in each direction. In this study, longitudinal

and lateral load distribution was calculated in front, mid and rear loaded architectural

layout.

3.8.1 Longitudinal load distribution

The longitudinal placement of the EV components battery pack, motor and

motor controllers determined the longitudinal load distribution of the vehicle. It

Battery

Front

Rear

Motor

Motor

Controller

Page 87: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

68

showed the percentage ratio of the front and rear load of the vehicle. The load

distribution of the existing vehicle Toyota Camry 2.4L sedan was 56.5:43.5 (front:

rear load distribution). Considering this load distribution of the existing vehicle, the

added and removed weight of the retrofitted vehicle and their longitudinal distance

from the centre of the wheelbase, longitudinal load distribution for each load

distribution case was calculated.

3.8.1.1 Longitudinal load distribution: case I

To calculate the longitudinal load distribution in case I following

considerations was used as described in table below:

Table 3-8: Longitudinal load distribution of front loaded layout (Case I)

Item Weight

(kg)

Distance from the centre of

the wheelbase (mm) Direction

Removed

Weight

Engine 140 1687.5 Towards Front

Gear box-

Alternator 20 1687.5 Towards Front

Battery 10 1687.5 Towards Front

Added

Weight

Battery

Pack 330 1687.5 Towards Front

Motor 60 1387.5 Towards Front

Motor

Controller 50 1500

Towards

Rear

From these data, longitudinal load distribution for case I was calculated as

58:42.

3.8.1.2 Longitudinal load distribution: case II

Longitudinal load distribution for case II was calculated from the following

data as given in table below:

Page 88: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

69

Table 3-9: Longitudinal load distribution of mid loaded layout (Case II)

Item Weight

(kg)

Distance from the centre of the

wheelbase (mm) Direction

Removed

Weight

Engine 140 1687.5 Towards Front

Gear box-

Alternator 20 1687.5 Towards Front

Battery 10 1687.5 Towards Front

Added

Weight

Battery

Pack 330 200

Towards

Rear

Motor 60 1387.5 Towards Front

Motor

Controller 50 1500

Towards

Rear

From these data, longitudinal load distribution for case I was calculated as

49:51.

3.8.1.3 Longitudinal load distribution: case III

Longitudinal load distribution for case II was calculated from the following

data:

The load distribution of the existing vehicle – 56.5:43.5

Table 3-10: Longitudinal load distribution of rear loaded layout (Case III)

Item Weight

(kg)

Distance from the centre of the

wheelbase (mm) Direction

Removed

Weight

Engine 140 1687.5 Towards Front

Gear box-

Alternator 20 1687.5 Towards Front

Battery 10 1687.5 Towards Front

Added

Weight

Battery

Pack 330 1500

Towards

Rear

Motor 60 1387.5 Towards Front

Motor Controller 50 1687.5 Towards

Front

Page 89: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

70

From these data, longitudinal load distribution for case III was calculated as

37:63.

3.8.2 Lateral load distribution

Lateral mass distribution of the vehicle was an important factor during

cornering for easy manoeuver. It was crucial to maintain lateral load distribution

equal to both sides. When the vehicle was starting to turn, load transfer occurred in

lateral direction towards the outside tires of the vehicle. If the load distribution would

not be equal in left and right side of the vehicle, one side of tyres faced intrinsic

amount of weight force during either left or right turn. Huge amount of weight

transferred towards one side of tires could cause skidding. In this study, all three

layouts with different longitudinal load distributions, lateral placing arrangement of

the components were maintained as 50:50 left to right. For each layout, extra weight

(250 kg) added during retrofitting was distributed equally to both the left and right

side of the vehicle. In this way the existing stability condition of the vehicle would

not be affected by the lateral load distribution after retrofitting.

3.9 Vehicle performance and Effect of CG CG is the point of equilibrium which is the mean location of all gravitational

forces acting on a vehicle. Position of CG plays an important role in improving

vehicle performance in terms of safe handling and stability. In this study,

determining the center of gravity was a complicated procedure because the load

might not be uniformly distributed throughout the object. Load distribution and CG

of the vehicle directly affected a variety of dynamic characteristics

including handling, acceleration, and traction and component life.

Placing of different EV components and drive train accessories changed the

position of CG along the vehicle and the dynamic stability of the vehicle with it. As

this study was concerned about the retrofitting of electric vehicle, load distribution

became more important in determining the CG of the vehicle than it was in case of

ICE vehicles. In case of conventional ICE vehicles, other factors such as track width,

length of wheelbase or suspension system could be changed. But due to the cost

Page 90: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

71

effectiveness issues of EV, it was vital to maintain the systems of the vehicle body as

existing.

Except load distribution, there were other regulatory factors to control the

position of CG. Those are: vehicle track width, vehicle weight, length of wheelbase,

suspension system etc. In case of retrofitting, length of wheelbase could not be

changed. A little modification could be achieved in track width by modifying the tire

profile. Suspension system might also be changed by adding stiffer spring. So among

these factors, load distribution had an intrinsic effect in case of retrofitted EV in

determining the CG.

3.9.1 Calculation of longitudinal CG

Longitudinal position of CG included the longitudinal distance of front (lf)

and rear (lr) axle from the CG of the vehicle. ‘lf’ and ‘lr’ calculated considering all

weight items and their corresponding distance from the front axle as reference, using

the equation below:

∑                              (3.3)

where, lf = Distance of CG from front axle. M = Vehicle weight. n = No. of item. m = Mass of component. lf = Corresponding CG distance of component from front axle.

In determining the longitudinal CG of the vehicle the weight items include

the added items (battery pack, motor, and controller) in the retrofitted vehicle and the

weight of the vehicle after removing the engine, gearbox, alternator and battery. The

distance of these weight items from the front axle were measured practically from the

vehicle.

3.9.2 Calculation of lateral CG

Lateral CG depended on the lateral load distribution of the vehicle directly.

As in this case, lateral load distribution was maintained as close to 50:50, the lateral

position of the CG would be at close to the centre of the track width of the vehicle.

Page 91: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

72

The track width of the existing vehicle was 1400 mm. So the lateral distance of the

CG from the left or right wheel was found 700 mm.

3.9.3 Calculation of vertical CG

Vertical CG could be calculated experimentally in different ways. Lifting and

tilting were found very commonly used method of determining the vertical CG of the

vehicle practically according to the literature review. As in this case, retrofitting of

the vehicle was involved, height of CG (CGH) from the ground was calculated

considering all weight items and their corresponding distance from the ground as

reference, using the equation below:

∑ (3.4)

where, CGH = Distance of CG from ground. M = Vehicle weight. n = No. of item. m = Mass of component. CGH = Corresponding CG distance of component from ground.

In determining the vertical CG of the vehicle the weight items included the

added items (battery pack, motor, and controller) in the retrofitted vehicle and the

weight of the vehicle after removing the engine, gearbox, alternator and battery. The

height of these weight items from the ground were measured practically from the

vehicle.

3.10 Discussion and findings The main objective of this research was to evaluate the vehicle dynamic

behaviour in different architectural layouts of the retrofitted electric vehicle. The

basic significant factor to define the architectural layouts was the load distribution of

the vehicle which was dependent on the positions of different retrofitted weight items

in the vehicle. In this condition, selection of appropriate EV propulsion system,

electric motor and vehicle parameter were also important for retrofitting of EV. To

obtain the load distribution, the available places in the vehicle were measured from

the selected vehicle for retrofitting. After getting the required measurement from the

Page 92: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

73

vehicle, the longitudinal and lateral load distribution ratio of the vehicle was

calculated. From the weight of each component and the distance from a defined

reference the longitudinal, lateral and vertical positions of CG were calculated.

Results were presented in the Table 3-11 below according to case I, II and III. The

summery of different considerations of designing of the architectural layouts were

also associated with the load distribution and CG calculation results.

Table 3-11: EV component placement and different load properties of front, mid and rear architectural layouts

Criteria Front Loaded Layout (Case I)

Mid Loaded Layout (Case II)

Rear Loaded Layout (Case III)

Battery Location Front Bonnet Mid area

(Under the seats) Rear Boot

Motor Location Inside the Front Wheel

Inside the Front Wheel

Inside the Front Wheel

Controller Location Rear Boot Rear Boot Front Bonnet

Load Distribution Ratio (F/R) 58:42 49:51 37:63

Load Distribution Ratio (Lateral) 50:50 50:50 50:50

CG position - lf (Longitudinal)

(From Front Axle) 1165.5 1415.25 1748.25

CG position - lr (Longitudinal)

(From Rear Axle) 1609.5 mm 1359.75 mm 1026.75 mm

CG position (Lateral - From Both

Side) 700 mm 700 mm 700 mm

CG position (Vertical - From

Ground) 765.98 mm 742.62 mm 781.75 mm

In selection of suitable EV propulsion system for retrofitting, the basic

considerations were space savings for the battery pack and the rate of power loss due

to the transmission. In wheel technology was selected because it allowed more space

on board with the motor packaged inside the wheel when compared with other

Page 93: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

74

propulsions. It also provided zero transmission power loss because it redundant the

transmission gear between the motor and the drive wheel. Electric motor was

selected to suit the requirements of in-wheel propulsion system. The vehicle with

suitable parameter was also selected based on the in-wheel propulsion system. The

wheel diameter, space allocation for the battery pack and power required to drive the

vehicle were the basic considerations based on which the collected data from the

automotive industry was scrutinized and categorized. Among all the industry data on

different size of vehicles, a mid-sized vehicle was chosen. Toyota CAMRY Attara S

2012 model was selected for retrofitting in this study.

The sustainability analysis of the brake and suspension system of the existing

vehicle was accomplished to check the feasibility of the vehicle parameter selection.

The extreme thermal and elastic load condition was considered during the both brake

and suspension system analysis with the retrofitted weight of the vehicle. The brake

analysis results referred to the sustainability of the existing disc brake with the

retrofitted load at the given operating temperature. The safety analysis of the

suspension system concluded that the coil spring of the existing suspension could

carry two times more than the retrofitted weight of the vehicle.

To obtain the architectural layout the potential spaces were defined in the

vehicle described with their merits and demerits to suit the requirements. After

analysing different space options, the front bay, mid area under passenger seat and

the rear boot space were selected for the design iterations. The literature review on

the battery placement in the commercial EVs were also considered. In the CAD

model the architectural layouts based on the space selected were demonstrated in

three cases as shown in Figure 3-8, Figure 3-9 and Figure 3-10 accordingly.

The longitudinal load distribution was calculated for three cases as 58:42,

49:51 and 37:63. The lateral load distribution was maintained as the existing vehicle

to avoid the unstable dynamic condition during cornering manoeuvring. The

longitudinal, lateral and vertical CG positions were calculated for the retrofitted

weight of the vehicle as mentioned in Table 3-11. These result data were used as the

input value in the vehicle dynamic analysis in different manoeuvring conditions.

Page 94: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

75

CHAPTER 4

VEHICLE DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

Vehicle performance is considered as a function of the vehicle motion

according to the previous study. To obtain the vehicle performance data at the

dynamic condition, the analysis of the motion of the vehicle is required at a given

environment. This chapter focuses on the dynamic analysis of the vehicle

considering the three architectural layout cases demonstrated in section 3.7.2, 3.7.1

and 3.7.1.

The motion of the vehicle was based on the forces and moments acting on it

in both static and dynamic condition. These forces included the aerodynamic or air

drag force, gravitational force due to the mass of the vehicle, tractive force generated

by the electric motor and the rolling resistance caused by the friction between the

road surface and the contact patch of the tyre. The longitudinal force of the vehicle

which caused the translational motion of the vehicle was the vector sum of these

forces as discussed in literature review section 2.3. The vector direction of these

forces acting on the vehicle can be described by the following equation considering a

vehicle moving on an inclined road surface according to the literature (Rajamani,

2006):

(4.1)

where, = Longitudinal force on the vehicle = Tractive Force generated from the electric motor = Longitudinal aerodynamic drag force = Rolling resistance on the Tyres = Vehicle weight

= The inclining angle of the road

The longitudinal force acting on the drive wheel of the vehicle was the

primary force which made the vehicle move forward in a steady state driving. Forces

acting on the vehicle from tyre, gravity, aerodynamics and engine determined the

Page 95: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

76

dynamic behaviour of the vehicle. In this case electric motor used as driving force

which produced the tractive effort of all wheels causing translational motion of the

vehicle. The translational motion included both longitudinal and lateral motion.

These wheels also had resistive force working on them was known as rolling

resistance. There were some other resistive forces imposed on vehicle like grading

force and air drag force. Some vehicle components took part in dynamic behaviour

of the vehicle. The components related to vehicle motion, an overview were depicted

in Figure 4-1 to classify the acting forces based on their sources and behaviour.

Figure 4-1: Forces acting on different components

Handling characteristics of a road vehicle were considered as connected with

its response to steering commands and to environmental inputs affecting the direction

of motion of the vehicle such as wind and road disturbances. There were two basic

Page 96: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

77

concerns in vehicle handling: one was the control of the vehicle to a desired path, the

other was the stabilization of the direction of motion against external disturbances. In

case of retrofitting, placement of all EV drive train and other sub-systems required

both static and dynamic analysis for change in CG position due to different load

distributions. In this study, re-orientation of drive train components and other

subsystems in different places of the vehicle was considered to demonstrate the

effect of load distribution on dynamics of vehicle in different manoeuvring

conditions. The objective of this research was to analyse the effect of changing CG

on vehicle path while turning which would be useful to develop more robust control

strategy for vehicle stability. The stability analysis for vehicle motion relied on

vehicle dynamics. The vehicle handling and stability analysis required a vehicle

model that included all the components of vehicle dynamics those affecting on

vehicle stability. It indicated the need of a detailed and comprehensive vehicle model

to reproduce the behaviour of individual components as exactly as possible. Such a

vehicle modelling required equations of motions and interactions between

subsystems which were in the form of mathematical equations. Using these

mathematical equations, computer model was made that helped to analyse the

handling and stability of the vehicle in different manoeuvring conditions before

approaching towards controller design and prototyping.

This analysis focused on several vehicle handling features, such as polar

moment, path radius, tyre slip angle, lateral load transfer and tyre grip based on three

defined front, mid and rear load cases. Polar moment was subjected to determine the

intensity of the spinning capability of the vehicle and therefore, the reaction time

while turning. The radius of the path generated for a particular load case was to

decide the minimum radius required to perform a turn comfortably at a given speed.

A function of the slip angles of the front and rear tyres respectively defined the

behaviour of the vehicle in a targeted manoeuvre. If the ratio of the front to rear slip

angles was found nearly 1, the vehicle would tend to neutral steer. If the ratio was

calculated greater than 1(>1) and the slip angle produced by the rear tyre was greater

than the front tyre, then the vehicle would face under-steer handling. However, when

the ratio was less than 1(<1) and the front slip angle was greater than the rear slip

angle, then the vehicle would be over-steered (Pacejka).

Page 97: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

78

Figure 4-2: Forces acting on the tyres while cornering

Figure 4-2 explained the different forces acting on the tyre and their effects

on different vehicle dynamics features such as slip angle, and the actual and intended

direction of the vehicle.

4.1 Polar Moment The polar moment of the vehicle dictated the ease with which the vehicle

changes direction during steering. While vehicle changes direction in a corner, as far

away the centre of weight concentration located from the centre of gravity the

moment would be bigger. Ideal static mass distribution involved maintaining the

position of the centre of mass or centre of gravity (CG) towards the midpoint of the

vehicle in longitudinal, lateral and vertical direction. This ideal position of the CG

ensured that the centre of weight concentration was at the mid-area of the vehicle,

which improved the polar moment of inertia condition in terms of vehicle handling

Page 98: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

79

and stability in dynamic conditions. Balancing the load evenly in the vehicle

provided an even distribution for a balanced response to dynamic changes. By taking

the moment of each weight item from the centre of weight concentration, the

following equation was obtained.

W l – x W l x (4.2)

where, W = Weight of the vehicle at front W = Weight of the vehicle at rear, l = The distance of CG from the front axle l = The distance of CG from the rear axle, x = Distance of CG from weight-concentration.

4.2 Path Radius   Radius of the curved path followed by the vehicle was based on the cornering

stiffness of the tyres, vehicle speed and CG position in the longitudinal direction. In

this calculation magnitude of the curved path was measured at a given speed during a

cornering situation in a certain steering angle of the vehicle. Eq. 4.3 (Rajamani, 2006) 

was the governing equation to calculate the radius of the curved path.

(4.3)

where, R = Radius of the curved path,

= Longitudinal speed of the vehicle, = Cornering Stiffness of the front tyre. = Cornering Stiffness of the rear tyre.

= Steering Angle M = Vehicle weight

The retrofitting vehicle consisted of same tyre profile both at the front and

rear. So in this analysis, the cornering stiffness of the front and rear tyres were

considered as equal. Assuming equal cornering stiffness ( ) for the

front and rear tyres the equation 4.3 became:

Page 99: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

80

(4.4)

The cornering stiffness per degree of slip angle was taken to be 16.5% of the

vertical load on the tyre in each load condition The value of cornering stiffness was

assumed to be same for the both front and rear tyres in this study and maximum

speed of the vehicle was considered as 60 km/hr. Radius of the path followed by

vehicle determined a dynamic feature of the vehicle. At a given speed, the path

radius was based on the cornering stiffness of the tyre and CG of the vehicle which

were the functions of load distribution of the vehicle. The path radius determined the

intensity of the smooth response of the turning vehicle for a given speed under

different load conditions. The longitudinal CG position from the front (lf) and rear

(lr) axle value was taken from Table 3-11 in previous chapter.

4.3 Vehicle Model The control analysis and controller design for the vehicle motion relied on the

vehicle dynamic characteristics. Vehicle dynamic characteristics included the slip

angle generated by the tyres, side slip angle due to the lateral load transfer, trajectory

of the path followed by the vehicle in a certain manoeuvre etc. For an intelligent

control system design of a vehicle, it required to obtain the vehicle dynamics data in

different driving conditions based on the longitudinal, lateral and vertical position of

CG. A model based simulation consisting of different component blocks, such as

axle, wheels and body, using MATLAB SIMULINK was modelled in this study

(Hasan, 2012). The model was based on the equation of motion and interaction

between subsystems. The model was used to calculate the front and rear slip angles

and simulate the trajectory of the vehicle in load cases I, II and III. The detail vehicle

model in MATLAB Simulink is provided in appendix A.3.

Page 100: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

81

Figure 4-3: The schematic diagram of the simulation

A specific vehicle model was developed to calculate various vehicle

dynamics characteristics for a front wheel drive vehicle with the parameters selected

for retrofitting in previous chapter. The simulation was based on two manoeuvring

conditions. One was considering a sudden change in manoeuvre with accelerating or

braking and another was cornering situation of the vehicle. In both case the steering

angle of the vehicle was the significant factor for the simulation. All the components

of the model were developed in subsystems. In both case, the modelling assumptions

were same i.e. the model vehicle was simulated in same environment and road

condition. Figure 4-3 demonstrated the schematic diagram of the vehicle model.

4.3.1 Modelling Assumptions

In this simulation, some assumptions were made to avoid the complicacy of

the system. These assumptions were made for the vehicle model creation. These

defined the road condition, the intended direction of the vehicle, load condition of the

vehicle etc.

Page 101: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

82

4.3.1.1 Moving Load

The moving load on the vehicle included the passenger and luggage weight.

These load could be shifted anywhere in the vehicle. To ease the simulation process,

it was assumed that there was no moving load on any of the axles (passenger and

luggage) or on the front, mid and rear portion of the vehicle.

4.3.1.2 Camber Angle

The camber angle of the vehicle was taken as the angle between the drive

wheel and the vertical axis of the vehicle perpendicular to the ground. This angle

affected the contact patch area of the tyre directly. It changed the behaviour of the

suspension system of the vehicle. For a zero camber, maximum traction could be

attained in a longitudinally accelerating situation. To simplify the simulation, the

camber angle was considered as zero for all wheels including the driving wheels.

Another reason for considering zero camber was the MacPherson strut suspension

system. According to the automobile industry data, in Macpherson strut suspension

system the camber was being fixed. As in this retrofitting case, the existing

suspension was not replaced or modified; the adjusted camber was kept as current

condition.

4.3.1.3 Angle of Inclination

In the simulation, the vehicle was assumed to be steered on a plain road with

a zero degree inclined angle. This assumption was made to avoid the complications

due to the components of the force acting on the wheels caused by the angle of

inclination of the road.

4.3.1.4 Road Surface

The condition of road surface was determined by the friction coefficient of

the road (μ) which was also defined as the adhesive capability of the road surface.

When the tractive force acted upon the wheels this adhesive capability made the

vehicle move forward. For further increase in tractive force, the wheel would start to

slide. The frictional coefficient varied from different road conditions and the

properties of the road materials. Hence, the frictional coefficient was inserted into the

simulation as a constant value. Table 4-1 showed the average peak and sliding values

Page 102: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

83

of the frictional coefficient of the road surface in different condition and for different

material of the road as investigated in previous literature (Rajamani et al., 2010).

Table 4-1: Average values of the frictional coefficient of road surface

Surface Peak Values Sliding Values

Asphalt and concrete (dry) 0.8–0.9 0.75

Concrete (wet) 0.8 0.7

Asphalt (wet) 0.5–0.7 0.45–0.6

Grave 0.6 0.55

Earth road (dry) 0.68 0.65

Earth road (wet) 0.55 0.4–0.5

Snow (hard packed) 0.2 0.15

Ice 0.1 0.07

From Table 4-1 it was noticed that, on a dry road, the available μ could be up

to 0.9, but on a wet road, it could be 0.4 or lower not depending on a particular road

material. Here, this simulation was developed for a given coefficient of friction

(μ 0.6 .

4.3.2 Sudden Manoeuvring Vehicle Dynamics

Vehicle dynamic behaviour was simulated in sudden manoeuvring condition.

In emergency sudden unintended acceleration or brake was the main consideration in

simulating the model vehicle. The trend of the steering angle applied for this

simulation was based on the pattern of the standard stability test by Federal Motor

Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS). The main model was developed based on the

equation of vehicle motion. The basic consideration of this simulation model were

the vehicle moving forward with an initial velocity and sudden change of steering

input in both directions. The model could be used for both the acceleration and

braking situations. In this study, only acceleration was considered to obtain the

dynamic behaviour of the vehicle. The angular velocity, rolling resistance,

aerodynamic drag force at the frontal area of the vehicle, yaw rate, longitudinal,

Page 103: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

84

lateral and vertical or normal forces on the tyre were calculated in this simulation to

get the dynamic behaviour of the vehicle based on slip of the front and rear wheel,

longitudinal and lateral velocity, forces on the tyres due to the change of manoeuvre.

The position of CG was an important factor in this simulation which regulated the

dynamics of the vehicle for each layout. The vehicle model was presented in the

Figure 4-4.

Figure 4-4: Vehicle model in sudden maneuvering condition

4.3.2.1 The Motion Plane

The model was developed to simulate the vehicle motion on a plane which

related the vehicle body with the virtual world. In MATLAB SIMULINK, world

plane stood for the kinematic and geometric construct to define both the absolute

inertial reference frame and the absolute coordinate system. It possess that world has

a fixed origin and fixed coordinate which were defined as the positive X direction

was on the right, the gravity of the model was towards the negative Y direction and

the positive Z direction was towards out of the screen. Figure 4-5 showed the planar

Page 104: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

85

or ground joint used in this simulation to get the vehicle motion in relation to the

world plane or the absolute axis.

Figure 4-5: The Plane of the motion

4.3.2.2 Longitudinal, lateral and normal force

To analyse the effect of different load distributions on vehicle stability,

longitudinal forces generated on the drive wheel were considered in the model

vehicle. In case of cornering dynamic analysis, longitudinal forces in the X direction

was given as input data following the torque generation characteristics of an electric

motor, with a higher starting torque decreasing with time and finally fixed at constant

torque value. To find the longitudinal force ‘Fx’, the tractive force of the electric

motor Ft, aerodynamic force acting on the vehicle Fa, Rolling Resistance Force Fr

and force due to the inclination angle of the road were calculated. The limitation of

required torque to run the drive train of the vehicle caused by the retrofitting of the

vehicle was also considered. The required torque of the vehicle was 215 N-m. From

this, he required longitudinal force was calculated as 581.7 N considering the wheel

size R 18. So, the minimum longitudinal force generated from two PM motors fitted

inside the drive wheels was to be 581.7 N.

Tractive force Ft was found from the available permanent magnets

synchronous motors designed for industrial machines integration. These motors were

specially engineered to achieve the higher and higher performances required in the

automation field by a high torque capability at low speed and by the elimination of

the traditional components of the kinematic chain which allowed increasing the

precision and the efficiency of industrial machines. These types of PM synchronous

motors were available in the market with 150-300 N-m torque and 56-210 KW

Page 105: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

86

power. In this case, two PM motors of 220 N-m was considered to be sufficient to

generate the required power. A total torque 440 N-m was able to generate 1190 N

longitudinal force with the selected wheel size.

The longitudinal aerodynamic drag force Fa referred to the force required to

overcome air resistance. The equivalent aerodynamic drag force on the vehicle was

calculated using the equation 4.5 (Rajamani, 2006):

(4.5)

where, ρ = mass density of air = 1.225 kg/m3, Cd = aerodynamic drag coefficient = 0.26 [for passenger vehicle] AF = frontal area of the vehicle = 1.6+0.00056(M-765) Vwind = Wind velocity considered as zero

The frontal area of the vehicle was considered for passenger vehicles with

mass in the range of 800-2000 kg according to the empirical formula from the

literature (Rajamani, 2006). The aerodynamic drag force Fa was found as shown in

Table 4-2.

Table 4-2: The aerodynamic drag force calculated for three load cases

Fa (N) Case I Case II Case III

141.22 137.1 132.1

Rolling resistance force FR on the tyre was calculated from the model as

being proportional to the normal forces on front and rear tyres. The governing

equations (Rajamani, 2006) used for the calculation are given below:

(4.6)

where,

(4.7)

And

(4.8)

As no inclination was assumed for the road condition, the value of was

considered as zero. The value of rolling resistance coefficient CR was considered as

Page 106: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

87

0.015 which is a typical value for passenger cars with radial tyres. The height of

CGH was found from the Table 3-11 of the previous chapter and the height (ha) of

the location at which Fa acts was given as 0.75. From the simulation, FR was

calculated as 251.4 N.

In this simulation, the value of the longitudinal force Fx , lateral force Fy and

the vertical force Fz were obtained from the equations of motion of the vehicle body

as stated below (Rajamani, 2006):

cos sin (4.9)

sin cos (4.10)

sin cos

cos sin (4.11)

4.3.2.3 Steering Angle

The steering angle was based on variable speed and steer condition. The

angle was maintained zero for almost half of the duration of the simulation. Then the

fluctuation in the angle was applied in both directions as shown in Figure 4-6. The

magnitude of the steering angle was between +2 and -2 degree within 2 sec.

Figure 4-6: Steering angle for sudden maneuvering

Page 107: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

88

4.3.2.4 Velocity and Yaw rate

The velocity of the vehicle in both longitudinal and lateral direction and the

yaw rate were calculated from the simulation. The longitudinal and lateral forces

acting on the tyre were calculated from the tyre model by considering the cornering

stiffness and the rolling resistance. By solving the equation of vehicle motion

considering the CG position and aerodynamic force of the vehicle, the velocity and

yaw rate was calculated. The Simulink model of this calculation was displayed in

Figure 4-7:

Figure 4-7: Calculation of velocity and yaw rate

4.3.2.5 Front and Rear Slip

The wheels experienced a difference between the longitudinal velocity (Vx)

and the equivalent rotational velocity of the tyre depending on the frictional

coefficient of the tyre-road interface and the normal force acting on the tyre.

Longitudinal forces acting on the tyre was dependent on the longitudinal slip.

According to the literature, the longitudinal tyre force is directly proportional to the

slip ratio for a small slip. In case of large amount of slip, the longitudinal tyre force

needed to be calculated by non-linear mathematical model. The longitudinal slip for

front and rear tyres during acceleration was calculated for three load cases from the

equation (Rajamani, 2006) below:

Page 108: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

89

(4.12)

where, = Longitudinal Slip

= The effective radius of the wheel, = The rotational speed of the wheel

4.3.3 Vehicle Cornering Dynamics

The cornering performance of the model vehicle was simulated on a track,

where the maximum speed that a vehicle could maintain around a circular path on a

dry, flat surface was measured. The simulation of vehicle trajectory in cornering

condition of the vehicle was demonstrated in Figure 4-8. The detail of this simulation

was given in appendix 0

The main factors affecting the performance were the tyre characteristics and

the suspension system of the vehicle. The lateral acceleration, tyre traction with the

increase of vertical load and the steering angle for the cornering of the vehicle were

given as input to this simulation (Mazumder, 4-8 March, 2012, Mazumder, 2011).

Figure 4-8: Model for cornering behavior of the vehicle

Page 109: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

90

4.3.3.1 Sprung and Un-sprung Roll

Lateral forces in the y direction were generated in the simulation from the

sprung and un-sprung roll of the model vehicle at a given steering angle. In this

simulation, sprung mass represented the total mass of the car excepting the wheels

and chassis. And un-sprung mass was considered as the mass of the wheels and

chassis. Here, revolute block was inserted to one rotational degree of freedom in

which the follower body (F as noted in Figure 4-9) relative to the base body (B as

noted in Figure 4-9). And the joint spring and damper was placed in as a damped

oscillator in joint which was connecting the F and B body. This angular displacement

determined the roll of the vehicle due to the vehicle sprung and un-sprung mass on

the torsional spring joint and damper which was measured by the joint sensor and

given as input data into the wheel block of the main vehicle model to get the

cornering effect. In this joint sensor, the follower (F) and base (B) body sequence

and the joint axis determined the direction of forward motion of the vehicle.

Figure 4-9: Sprung and un-sprung roll calculation

4.3.3.2 Wheels Block

Wheels were divided into separate subsystem based on the drive wheels. In

this case, front wheels were considered as drive wheels following the similar

situation as the existing vehicle. Steering angle based on time was given as input

directly to the front drive wheels. The trend of the steering angle was chosen as

increasing with time to obtain the cornering effect on the vehicle. The maximum

steering angle was considered as 4º as shown in Figure 4-10.

Page 110: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

91

Figure 4-10: Steering angle for cornering dynamic model

Un-sprung, sprung and the wheel sensed roll (data from sensor) were

considered to calculate the force Fy for steady state cornering of the vehicle. The

lateral force Fy was then connected to the axle of the model vehicle through a joint

connector. The steering angle was entered into the drive wheel sub-system.

Figure 4-11: Lateral force on the front (drive) and rear wheels accordingly

4.3.3.3 Body Sensor Block

In this simulation, a sensor block was connected to the model vehicle body.

It was connected to define the motion of the coordinate system of the main body of

the vehicle. This sensor could measure any combination of translational position,

Page 111: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

92

velocity and acceleration; rotational orientation, angular velocity and acceleration

from which the vehicle position (x, y and z), the velocity of the vehicle (Vx, Vy and

Vz) and the angular velocity (roll, pitch and yaw) were obtained. This sensor

determined the yaw rate and therefore the direction and position of the vehicle as it

starts to roll over from which the slip angles of the front and rear tyres were

calculated in this simulation.

4.3.3.4 Vehicle Trajectory

When the drive wheels turned a different way to the desired direction, the

angle created between the actual and intended path of the vehicle was considered as

the slip angle. It was related to the lateral load or cornering force of the tyre. As the

lateral load increased due to higher cornering speeds, tyres tended to the outside of

the turn and therefore move in a direction that was different from their heading

direction. Slip angle changed proportionally with load transfer but not at a constant

rate. Tyre cornering coefficient declined as vertical load increased. The coefficient

was determined by the percentage of rated load that was represented by the actual

vertical load imposed on the tyre. Here, analysis was conducted based on the effect

of load cases I, II and III for a given cornering coefficient. In this analysis, slip angle,

α was calculated by using equation 4.13 and 4.14 (Rajamani, 2006) for front and rear

tyres:

∝ δ

(4.13)

(4.14)

where, ∝ , ∝ = The front and rear slip angles,

= The steering angle, = The lateral speed of the Vehicle, = The Yaw Rate.

Here, V V and φ were generated from the vehicle model. In this analysis,

slip angles produced by the front and rear tyres were calculated with different

vertical loads on the tyre, considering the three load distribution cases.

The trajectory of the vehicle over time was calculated as a function of a

vehicle dynamic parameter. The calculation was based on the signal from the sensor

Page 112: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

93

connected to the model vehicle. The governing equation followed to obtain the

vehicle trajectories were for a front wheel steering vehicle of Ackerman steering

theory (Gillespie, February 1992) as given below:

| |

(4.15)

| |

(4.16)

Here, wheelbase (wb) and track (tr) were taken from Table 3-4 from the

previous chapter. V was the velocity of the vehicle and was considered as a control

parameter (Ackerman angle) calculated from the steering angle of the vehicle.

The trajectory of the vehicle was calculated over time starting from a location

which was plotted as the coordinate (0, 0). From the simulation, the vehicle position

in the x and y direction was plotted to obtain the trajectory of the vehicle on the

track. The sensor got the signal of the vehicle position according to the x and y

coordinates and plotted it on the track. The X-Y plot demonstrated different effects

for the three load distribution cases on vehicle trajectory. Vehicle trajectory

represented the actual and intended path of the vehicle so that handling

characteristics can be measured for a given steering angle for steady state cornering.

4.3.3.5 Lateral Load Transfer – Tyre Grip

When setting up a retrofitted chassis with an electric drive train and battery

pack, it was important to consider the lateral load transfer characteristics of the

vehicle. Traction generated by a tyre was considered as a decreasing function of

vertical load according to the literature as shown in ‘section A’ in Figure 4-12. The

detail of the simulation was given in appendix 0As the vertical load on a tyre

increased, the amount of traction went up, but at a decreasing rate. It was based on

several conditions such as camber, ambient temperature, tyre temperature and the

track surface condition, and obviously the type of tyre.

As the cornering dynamics of the vehicle was considered here, the centrifugal

force caused the vehicle leaned to outward or sideways at an increasing rate, which

was denoted as the lateral acceleration. Lateral acceleration was based on the speed

Page 113: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

94

of the vehicle, the road condition. It could be based on the timing of the driver’s

input in steering while entering the curved path which was not considered in this

simulation. In this study a function of lateral acceleration with time was considered,

referred to as section B in Figure 4-12. Lateral acceleration with time could move

under the curvilinear line shown in section B. For the current analysis the worst case

scenario was simulated by considering maximum amount of lateral acceleration that

has been used as input data. During cornering of a vehicle, the load was transferred

from the inside tyres to the outside tyres due to the centrifugal force. This reduced

the overall traction that the front and rear pairs can generate because the outside tyres

did not gain the amount of the traction force as the inside tyres lost. A subsystem of

vehicle model (Figure 4-12) for cornering dynamic analysis was created using

MATLAB-SIMULINK to calculate the amount of lateral load transfer and tyre grip

associated with it.

Figure 4-12: The calculation of Tyre Grip

Page 114: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

95

Lateral load transfer was calculated using the equation (Pacejka) below. CGH

was found from the Table 3-11 of the previous chapter.

LTL =LA M CGH/ (4.17)

where, LTL = Load transfer in the lateral direction, LA = Lateral acceleration

4.4 Results Results were obtained both from hand calculation and the vehicle model

simulation in sudden change in manoeuvring condition and during the cornering of

the vehicle. Results for different characteristics of vehicle dynamics were presented.

4.4.1 Polar moment

To get the polar moment ‘lf’ and ‘lr’ were taken from Table 3-11. The

distance of CG from the weight concentration of the vehicle, X was calculated for

three load cases from the moment equation. Therefore, the polar moment was

calculated from the product of vehicle weight and the distance of CG from the center

of weight concentration for each load condition. The vehicle weight was considered

1710 kg as stated in Table 3-4. Table 4-3 demonstrated the comparison based on

polar moment.

Table 4-3: Calculation results of polar Moment

Criteria Front-loaded

Layout (Case I)

Mid-loaded Layout

(Case II)

Rear-loaded Layout

(Case III)

Distance of Weight concentration

from CG 1.42 m 1.37 m 1.5 m

Polar Moment 2428 kg-m

2342.7 kg-m

2565 kg-m

Page 115: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

96

4.4.2 Path Radius

The radius of the curved path followed by the vehicle while driving at 20

km/hr. with 5º (left or right) steering angle were calculated as shown in Table 4-4 for

case I, II and III.

Table 4-4: Calculation results of Path Radius

Criteria Front-loaded

Layout (Case I)

Mid-loaded Layout

(Case II)

Rear-loaded Layout

(Case III)

Cornering Stiffness Equal in front and rear tyres

Equal in front and rear tyres

Equal in front and rear tyres

Path Radius 10 m 8 m 13 m

4.4.1 Velocity and Yaw Rate

The longitudinal and lateral velocity of the vehicle body was calculated from

the simulation. In three load distributions cases, Vx and Vy varied in a significant

magnitude. In each case, the variation in velocity was noticed within 8 to 12 sec time

period due to the fluctuation in steering angle at that time. The both longitudinal and

lateral velocity was presented in m/s in the figures below over time in each case of

load distribution.

Figure 4-13: Vx & Vy (m/s Vs time sec.) accordingly for front loaded layout

Page 116: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

97

Figure 4-14: Vx & Vy (m/s Vs time sec.) accordingly for mid loaded layout

Figure 4-15: Vx & Vy (m/s Vs time sec.) accordingly for rear loaded layout

The yaw rate for three cases was calculated as presented in figure below. The

magnitude of the yaw rate varied in a small amount for different load distributions of

the vehicle.

Figure 4-16: Yaw rate Vs time accordingly for front, mid and rear loaded layout

4.4.2 Front and Rear Slip

The front and rear slip were calculated from the simulation in the sudden

change in manoeuvring condition for three cases of load distribution. There was a

significant variation found in front and rear slip of the wheels for different load

distribution of the vehicle as shown in figure below.

Page 117: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

98

Figure 4-17: Front and rear slip Vs time sec. (Front load case I)

Figure 4-18: Front and rear slip Vs time sec. (Mid load case I)

Page 118: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

99

Figure 4-19: Front and rear slip Vs time sec. (Rear load case)

4.4.3 Vehicle Trajectory

In case of demonstrating the cornering behavior of the vehicle, the X-Y plot

of the vehicle trajectory was very significant. In this simulation, slip angles generated

at the front and rear tyres were also calculated. Trajectory of the vehicle was

dependent on the slip angles occurred at the tyres. The magnitude of the slip angle of

front and rear tyres controlled the handling behavior of the vehicle while cornering.

In the 20 seconds simulation, the front tyres generated a slip angle of 0-1.3

and the rear tyres generated a slip angle of 0-1.78 degrees in case- I. The mid-loaded

vehicle (Case- II) generated 0-1.45 at the front tyres and 0-1.53 degrees at the rear

tyres. In case- III, the front tyres generated 0-1.9 and the rear tyres generated 0-0.55

degrees of slip angle within 20 seconds. From the cornering dynamic analysis, the

front slip angle was found lower than the rear slip angle in case I. For the mid-loaded

case II, the front and rear slip angles were almost equal. In the rear-loaded case III,

the slip angles created by the front tyres were greater than those by the rear tyres.

Page 119: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

100

Front and rear slip angle ratio obtained for case I, II and III are 0.73, 0.95 and 3.47

accordingly during cornering of the vehicle.

 

Figure 4-20: Vehicle trajectory plot (Front loaded layout)

 

Figure 4-21: Vehicle trajectory plot (Mid loaded layout)

Actual Path

Intended Path

Actual Path

Intended Path

Page 120: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

101

 

Figure 4-22: Vehicle trajectory plot (Rear loaded layout)

For case- I with 58% of total weight at the front of the vehicle, the front tyres

experienced a major portion of the vehicle weight, which caused a greater slip angle

to be created by the rear tyres than the front. The radius of the actual path of the

vehicle was much lower than the intended path as shown in Figure 4-20.

In case- II the vehicle followed a path with a radius slightly lower than the

radius of the desired path, as shown in Figure 4-21. The slip angles created by the

front and rear tyres were found almost same in this case.

In case- III, with 37% of the total weight at the front, rear tyres faced the

major portion of the vehicle weight, which caused a greater slip angle to be created

by the front tyres, as in Figure 4-22. In this condition, the vehicle followed the

curved path of a larger radius than the intended trajectory of the vehicle.

4.4.4 Lateral Load Transfer and Tyre Grip

From the results, it was evident that the tyre grip for a vertical load decreased

as the amount of load transfer increased, as shown in Figure 4-23.

Actual Path

Intended Path

Page 121: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

102

 

Figure 4-23: Tyre grip Vs. Lateral Load Transfer.

For case- I, the maximum tyre grip obtained was 0.95, which decreased to

0.59 at the 50th second with a lateral load transfer of 601 kg. Case- II showed a

decreased tyre grip of 0.6 at the end of the simulation, which was the maximum grip

gained in all three load cases. In case III the tyre grip obtained was 0.58 and the

decreasing rate was found to be the maximum as shown in Figure 4-23.

4.5 Discussion To achieve an optimized load distribution specifically designed for retrofitted

EV based on the vehicle dynamics characteristics, an evaluation of the three basic

load distributions was performed here considering a model vehicle for simulation.

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

0.7

0.75

0.8

0.85

0.9

0.95

10 100 200 300 400 500 600

Tyr

e G

rip

Lateral Load Transfer

Case I Case II Case III

Page 122: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

103

4.5.1 Analysis on polar moment and curved path radius calculation

The polar moment had a significant difference in three load cases as

presented in Table 4-3. Case- II generated the minimum polar moment among three

cases, which indicated that a mid-loaded vehicle will respond best during cornering.

The rear loaded vehicle was found very stable with slow response to the steering

input as the maximum polar moment was calculated for the case III. However, in

case of estimation of the vehicle performance very fast response to the steering input

could cause the vehicle inherently easier to spin.

The radius of the curved path followed by the vehicle while turning at an

intersection was traced by the outside front steer wheel in this calculation. This

radius was based on the given speed of the turning vehicle. Calculation results

determined that Case II vehicle could follow the minimum path radius without

skidding for a given speed as shown in Table 4-4. In this calculation, other significant

factors such as steering geometry, driver behaviour, and operational efficiency of the

system were not considered.

4.5.2 Analysis on sudden change in manoeuvre condition

The calculation of longitudinal and lateral velocity of the vehicle in case of

sudden change in steering input at a running condition presented significant variation

in three load distribution cases. The maximum longitudinal velocity Vx was 18.64

m/s for load case I vehicle and the minimum was 16.49 m/s. The mid-loaded vehicle

experienced the maximum Vx 18.35 m/s which was very close to the load case I. The

rear loaded vehicle of case III obtained the minimum Vx among three load cases

which was 18 m/s. It was noticeable from velocity analysis in case of sudden

manoeuvre that the front loaded vehicle generated the maximum forward speed. The

lateral velocity was demonstrating another important dynamic behaviour of the

vehicle during the sudden manoeuvre. Experiencing the lateral velocity at a

significant magnitude could be harmful to the stability of the vehicle. The maximum

lateral velocity Vy was calculated 0.195 m/s for the load case III. The mid-loaded

vehicle experienced the minimum Vy which was 0.12 m/s. According to the analysis

results, the load case II vehicle demonstrated the most stable handling in the sudden

change in steering condition.

Page 123: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

104

In case of yaw rate calculation, the different load cases demonstrated

different magnitudes in sudden change in manoeuvre condition. But the differences

noticed in yaw rate were not very significant. The maximum yaw rate was found in

case III in both left and right direction. The minimum yaw rate measured in load case

II was (+0.118) and (-0.192) in left and right direction accordingly as shown in Figure

4-16.

The front and rear slip were calculated for three load cases. As the vehicle

model was considered as the front drive wheel, the front wheel experienced more slip

than the rear in each load case. From the results shown in 4.4.2, it was noticeable that

the front slip generated in both left and right direction did not have significant

differences in magnitude for each load case. But the rear slip demonstrated a little

difference for the load cases and the load case I experienced the minimum slip as

shown in Figure 4-17. The maximum front and rear slip were found for load case III

and the magnitudes were 2.116 (front) and 0.0217 (rear) as shown in Figure 4-19.

4.5.3 Analysis on cornering behaviour of the vehicle

The vehicle trajectory created from the X-Y plot (Figure 3(b)) also

demonstrated that the mid-loaded case could be referred to as having neutral

handling characteristics. The front loaded vehicle showed oversteering while

cornering and the rear-loaded vehicle showed understeer handling, according to the

vehicle trajectory and slip angle ratio results. The front and rear tyre slip angle ratio

of the mid-loaded case was almost equal to 1 (0.95) that is close to neutral handling

criteria. The front and rear slip angle generated for three load cases was around 2º.

The model vehicle was simulated in a dry road condition with the frictional

coefficient (µ) of 0.6. The results referred to the stable manoeuvrability of the

vehicle according to the literature (Gillespie, February 1992) which proved that the

maximum limit of slip angle could increase up to 10º for dry road with different

values of µ.

Lateral load transfer was found to be minimum in case- II (Mid-loaded

vehicle), which gave better traction responses and tyre grip than the other two cases.

The tyre grip generated in the three cases differed slightly from each other. From this

calculation, the maximum tyre grip was achieved in the case of mid-loaded

Page 124: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

105

distribution of the vehicle. Figure 4-23 showed that tyre grip decreased with an

increase of lateral load transfer but not in the same proportion. A mid-loaded vehicle

provided a lesser decrease in the rate of tyre grip during a steering manoeuvre. When

these manoeuvring situations would happen over the recommended speed of the

vehicle, longitudinal and lateral forces could cross the limit of traction circle;

therefore wheels would start skidding and the vehicle lost stability.

4.5.4 Comparison based on dynamic behaviour of the vehicle

Table 4-5 presents the comparison based on the results found from the dynamic

analysis of the vehicle for different stability and handling characteristics in different

driving conditions.

Table 4-5: Comparison on dynamic analysis results

Dynamic Characteristics Analysis based on the results for the load cases

Polar Moment

Load case II was found as the most stable with fast response to

the steering input though the vehicle could easily spin while

cornering.

Path Radius The minimum radius of the vehicle path was calculated in load

case II

Longitudinal Velocity Vx Load case I faced the maximum Vx

Lateral Velocity Vy Load case II faced the minimum Vy

Yaw Rate Minimum yaw rate was calculated in load case II

Front and Rear Slip Load case I faced the minimum slip for front and rear wheels

Vehicle Trajectory

Case I – Over steering (small)

Case II – neutral (small oversteering)

Case III – under steering (large)

Tyre Grip Maximum tyre grip was found for case II though case I was

very close.

4.6 Findings By comparing the dynamic characteristics of the model vehicle with different

load distributions, it was noticeable that the front and mid loaded conditions had

more stable handling features than the rear load distribution. Hence, the mid loaded

condition was the best solution in terms of dynamic features. But mid loaded

Page 125: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

106

distribution was based on major portion of the added weight (battery pack) to be

placed at the mid area of the vehicle during retrofitting. Placing the battery pack at

the mid area of the vehicle included the packaging limitations such as the external

weather protection for the pack. On the other hand, placing the battery pack in the

front engine bay was more comfortable for designing the packaging arrangement.

These concerns led to proposing a new architectural layout for retrofitting. The new

layout was proposed by dividing the battery in two different locations. The layout

was based on the analysis results obtained for different dynamic characteristics of the

vehicle stability and handling as shown in Table 4-5. The layout also accommodated

the space available in mid and front area of the vehicle.

4.6.1 The proposal of a new architectural layout

The new proposed architectural layout was arranged by using the empty front

bay space after the removal of the engine and other accessories during retrofitting.

As discussed in chapter 3, the added extra weight due to the retrofitting of EV was

250 kg and the major portion of this extra weight was the weight of the battery pack.

The new layout proposed the 60% weight of the battery placed at the front bay. The

total weight of the battery pack was considered 330 kg. According to the 60% of

total weight calculation, the battery pack of around 200 kg was proposed to place at

the front bay at the conceptual stage. The weight of the selected battery pack was 65

kg per unit with connecting 25 cells of power density 0.46 kw/kg. 5 units of these

batteries were selected for the retrofitting from which 3 units were to be placed in the

front bay of the vehicle having the total weight of 195 kg. The rest 2 units of the

batteries were placed in the mid area of the vehicle. In this study, the batteries in

front bay was denoted as pack 1 and in the mid area as pack 2.

4.6.1.1 CAD Model of the proposed layout

The new architectural layout proposed the position of the weight items as:

60% of the battery pack (3 packs) in the front bay

40% of the battery pack (2 packs) in the mid area

The motor controller in the front bay

Motor inside the front wheels.

Page 126: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

107

The fuel tank was removed from the vehicle to accommodate 2 packs of

batteries in the mid area under the passenger seat. As this layout kept the rear boot

space empty, the luggage capacity of the vehicle would not be compromised in this

case. The layout was demonstrated in the Figure 4-24.

Figure 4-24: The proposed architectural layout

4.6.1.2 Load distribution

Placing the retrofitting items in different locations in the vehicle changed the

load distribution. The load distribution of the existing vehicle was 56.5:43.5.

The removing weight items from the front were engine, gear box-alternator

and the battery with the total weight of 170 kg. The distance of removing front

weight items from the centre of the wheelbase was 1687.5 mm towards front. As

mentioned earlier, there was no removing weight from the rear. The fuel tank (5 kg)

was removed from the mid area of the vehicle.

The adding weight items at the front for retrofitting were pack 1, pack 2,

motor and motor controller with the total weight of 420 kg. The Table 4-6 presented

Battery

Front

Rear

Motor

Motor

Controller

Page 127: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

108

the weight of the removed and added items and the distance of those from the centre

of the wheelbase.

Table 4-6: Load distribution of the vehicle

Item Weight

(kg)

Distance from the centre of

the wheelbase (mm) Direction

Removed

Weight

Engine 140 1687.5 Towards Front

Gear box-

Alternator 20 1687.5 Towards Front

Battery 10 1687.5 Towards Front

Fuel Tank 5 50 Towards Rear

Added

Weight

Battery

Pack 1 195 1687.5 Towards Front

Battery

Pack 2 135 200 Towards Rear

Motor 60 1387.5 Towards Front

Motor

Controller 50 1687.5 Towards Front

The longitudinal load distribution of the layout was calculated from the data

given in the table as 55:45. The lateral load distribution was maintained as 50:50 left

to right as the other layouts.

4.6.1.3 Calculation of CG

The CG in longitudinal, lateral and vertical direction was calculated for this

proposed architectural layout in case of the retrofitting of Toyota Camry Attara S

2012 as given in the table below:

Table 4-7: The longitudinal, lateral and vertical position of CG

Distance (mm) Reference

Longitudinal CG 1248.75 Front axle

Lateral CG 700 From left or right side

Vertical CG 751.57 From ground

Page 128: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

109

To validate the proposed architectural layout, experiment result data were

calculated and analysed in this study. In the experiment set up, a test vehicle was

taken under consideration due to the unavailability of Toyota Camry for retrofitting.

The test vehicle was experimented based on dynamic behaviour considering the

manoeuvring conditions from the simulation of Toyota Camry specification.

Page 129: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

110

CHAPTER 5

EXPERIMENT AND VALIDATION OF

PROPOSED LAYOUT

The front, mid and rear load distribution layouts considering Toyota CAMRY

specification were analysed and compared in terms of dynamic behaviour in different

manoeuvring conditions such as sudden change in steering and cornering of the

vehicle in section 4.5.4. The space availability and placements of EV components

during retrofitting were also evaluated in previous chapter. Dynamic analysis results

referred to the mid-loaded layout as the most suitable for vehicle stability and

handling both in sudden change in steering and cornering conditions, though it

included the difficulties in space allocation with designing a packaging arrangement

at the mid area of the vehicle under the passenger seat. On the other hand, the front

bay of the vehicle was the proper solution in terms of space availability while

retrofitting as the engine and engine driven accessories from the front were removed.

Moreover, the battery pack installed at the front did not require any extra protection

from the weather exposure in case of front load distribution. Furthermore, the

dynamic behaviour of the vehicle with front load distribution was found very much

similar to the mid loaded layout and even better in some characteristics of vehicle

handling and stability such as front and rear slip of the tyre. These concerns led to the

new proposal for the load distribution accommodating both the mid area and the

front bay of the vehicle as proposed in section 4.6.1. The new architectural layout for

EV retrofitting was proposed to obtain an acceptable solution in terms of the vehicle

handling criteria and an optimum use of space in terms of design criteria. But the

validation of the proposed architectural layout was required as the separating the

battery pack was not implemented earlier due to the wiring and cooling arrangement

complicacy. This study focused on finding an optimum solution so that the retrofitted

vehicle performance could be enhanced and well-accepted by the industry. Due to

Page 130: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

111

the limitations of the resources, the experiment could not be set up based on an

existing Toyota Camry. This is why; the experiment was done considering a test

vehicle.

This chapter focuses on the validation of the new proposed architectural

layout based on simulation and experiment results of the test vehicle. The proposed

load distribution layout (Section 4.6.1) was applied on the test vehicle and the

experimental results are compared with the theoretical and simulation findings in this

chapter. After validation, the proposed load distribution was applied to the Toyota

Camry in simulation and the results were compared with the front and mid loaded

layout to check if the dynamic performance of the vehicle was increased.

5.1 Experiment Set up

Table 5-1: Drive train configuration of the test vehicle

Electric Motor

Power 1200W

Torque 35 n-m/282.5 rpm

Supply voltage 48V – 72V

Motor weight 12.5 kg

Speed 45/h

Sensor Type Hall sensor

Battery

Voltage 12V

Current 105 Ah

Cold Cranking Amps (CCA) 780

Length 305 mm

Width 168 mm

Height 207 mm

Terminal Height 213 mm

Page 131: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

112

To validate the feasibility of the proposed architectural layout an

experimental platform was set up in the lab. A demonstration vehicle was designed

and built in the lab. The design of the vehicle was done using Solidworks. The

accessories of the power train of the vehicle such as electric motor, battery,

suspension springs and other commercial electronic items were bought from the

market. The electric motor was installed inside the wheel according to the in-wheel

technology. The weight items were placed to maintain the longitudinal load

distribution of the vehicle as 55:45 as proposed. To check the load distribution, the

vehicle was placed on the load measuring platform as shown in Figure 5-1. In the load

measuring platform, there were 4 load machines to collect the load on 4 wheels and

send the data to the electronic display connected to the machines. The placement of

the power train accessories is shown in Figure 5-1. Drum brakes were installed inside

the wheel of the vehicle. The other configuration of the vehicle drive train including

motor, brakes, battery etc. was as shown in Table 5-1.

Figure 5-1: Experiment set up of the vehicle in the lab

Page 132: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

113

The vehicle parameter used for the analysis was given in Table 5-2:

Table 5-2: Parameter of the vehicle

Vehicle Parameters

Total Weight (Without the Driver) 275 kg

Weight (With Driver) 335 kg

Wheel Base 1.78 m

Track Width 1.06 m

Battery Weight 27.4 kg

Tyre 3.00 -10”

The load on each tyre measured in the lab was:

Table 5-3: Load on each tyre

Vehicle Weight 275 kg (Without the driver)

Front Left Wheel 76 kg Front Right Wheel 75 kg

Rear Left Wheel 63 kg Rear Right Wheel 61 kg

Vehicle Weight 335 kg (With the driver)

Front Left Wheel 96 kg Front Right Wheel 95 kg

Rear Left Wheel 78 kg Rear Right Wheel 76 kg

From Table 5-3 it was noticeable that the lateral load distribution of the

demonstration vehicle was not symmetric. A very little difference was noticed when

measured the load on each tyre. The left side of the vehicle was loaded more than the

right side. The difference was around 3 kg from right to left side which was not very

significant.

5.1.1 Frictional Coefficient of the track (lab floor)

The frictional coefficient, µ of the vehicle path was dependent on the material

properties of the floor of the lab. The lab floor was made of concrete and according

to the Table 4-1, the frictional coefficient of the concrete was 0.8 – 0.9. In this case,

µ was considered as 0.9 for the analysis.

Page 133: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

114

5.1.2 CG Calculation

5.1.2.1 Longitudinal and lateral CG

The position of longitudinal and lateral CG was calculated accordingly from

the longitudinal and lateral load distribution of the vehicle from the wheelbase (1.78

m) and track width (1.06 m) of the vehicle. The longitudinal load distribution was

55:45 and the lateral load distribution was 51:49 which were calculated from the load

measured on each tyre. The longitudinal CG calculated was 0.801 m from the front

axle and 0.979 m from the rear axle. The lateral position of CG from the centre axis

of the left wheel was calculated 0.5194 m.

5.1.2.2 Vertical CG

The vertical CG (CGH) was measured from the weight of the vehicle on the

front wheels by weighing the rear side of the vehicle at 310 mm height (noted as ‘y’

in Figure 5-2) from the ground by a small crane in the lab. Lifting up the rear side at

the mentioned height made the angle of 10º with ground. The diagram of raising the

vehicle was as given here from which the equation of the CG height calculation

formed:

Figure 5-2: Diagram for CGH calculation

Page 134: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

115

The load calculation on the front wheel when the vehicle was at horizontal

level, 1 (5.1)

From the Figure 5-2, the load calculation on the front wheel when the vehicle was

lifted,

1 (5.2)

From the geometry of the diagram,

(5.3)

Now equation (5.2) became,

1

≫ 1

≫ (5.4)

where,

= Load on front wheel at horizontal level = Load on front wheel at inclined condition = Difference between horizontal and inclined load on front wheel

= Wheelbase =

The load, and were measured from the load calculating machine. To

consider the weight of the driver in the CGH calculation, a load bar of 60 kg was

attached on the driver seat. The Table 5-4 presented the measurement and the results

of CGH calculation of the vehicle:

Page 135: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

116

Table 5-4: Experimental data and result of the vehicle

Experimental Data and Results

191 kg

217.74 kg

26.74 kg

A 10º

1.78 m

W 335 kg

CGH 0.8058 m

The vertical CG calculation of the vehicle in the lab was shown in Figure 5-3:

Figure 5-3: Vertical CG calculation

Page 136: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

117

5.1.3 Measurement of turning radius

The intended radius of the vehicle was calculated and then the actual radius

was found by driving the vehicle to compare the experimental and theoretical results.

To get the intended radius of the vehicle, the desired steering angle was set as 4.5.

The steering angle was chosen to suit the magnitude of the radius with the lab space.

The desired radius was 4 m maximum.

From the Ackerman steering theory (Gillespie, February 1992), the intended

radius for the given steering angle is,

(5.5)

For the desired steering angle 4.5 and the value of wheelbase as 1.78 m,

the intended radius of the vehicle was calculated as 0.395 m. Then the intended path

of the vehicle was marked on the lab floor by following the calculated intended

radius.

5.1.4 Measurement of contact patch

The contact patch was calculated for front and rear tyre. The dimension of the

contact patch was demonstrated in Figure 5-4 (Rajamani, 2006).

Figure 5-4: The profile of contact patch of the tyre

Page 137: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

118

2a was the length of the contact patch, 2b was the width. The value of ‘a’ and

‘b’ were required for tyre force calculation of the vehicle from the tyre model.

From the data found for contact patch, the effective radius of the tyre, reff was

calculated from the relationship of the effective radius and the angle (∅) made by the

radial line joining the centre of the wheel to the end of contact patch. The equation

(Rajamani, 2006) used for the calculation was:

∅ (5.6)

To simplify the calculation, the contact patch area was considered as

symmetric along the longitudinal axis. The reff for 4 wheels did not have any

significant difference in the magnitude. The measured data of the tyre contact patch

and the calculated value of reff were given in the Table 5-5.

Table 5-5: Contact patch and effective radius of the tyre calculation

Length, 2a Width, 2b Effective

Radius, reff

Front left wheel 40 mm 25 mm

0.38 m Front right wheel 38 mm 24 mm

Rear left wheel 35 mm 20 mm

Rear right wheel 34 mm 19 mm

5.2 Experiment and simulation results for the test vehicle 5.2.1 Polar Moment

By taking the moment of the load on front and rear wheel from the centre of

weight concentration of the vehicle, the equation below was obtained.

(5.7)

The load on front and rear wheel and were collected from the Table 5-3.

The value of and were from longitudinal CG calculation. The distance of CG

from the centre of weight concentration, ‘x’ was calculated from the equation 27 as

0.06 m. The polar moment of the vehicle was found as 20 kg-m.

Page 138: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

119

5.2.2 Turning Radius

In this experiment, the vehicle was tested in a defined cornering track of 4 m

radius at a given speed of 10 km/hr. The vehicle was set at the steering angle of 4.5.

Experimental results presented the difference between the intended and actual radius

of turning circle followed by the vehicle. The vehicle followed a curved path which

was not very similar to the intended circular path marked on the track. The actual

path of the vehicle consisted of different radius at different points on the curve.

When the vehicle was turned left on the defined track, the average turning circle

radius followed by the vehicle was measured 3.7 m.

5.2.3 Vehicle Trajectory

Vehicle trajectory was calculated at cornering of the vehicle condition. This

calculation was done to check the findings from the experiment result of turning

radius of the vehicle. The actual turning radius of the vehicle was found lower than

the intended radius of the circular path. In the cornering dynamic simulation, the

given data was measured from the vehicle in the lab. The steering angle was given as

input according to the turning radius experiment. The slip angles at front and rear

tyres were calculated from the simulation shown in Figure 4-8. The front slip angle αf

and the rear slip angle αr were found as ‘0.727’ and ‘0.8186’ accordingly. From the

cornering model, the position of the vehicle in the X and Y coordinate was then

plotted to obtain the path followed by the vehicle while turning left. The intended

and actual path followed by the vehicle in the X-Y plot was demonstrated in the

Figure 5-5.

Page 139: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

120

Figure 5-5: Vehicle trajectory plot (Test Vehicle)

5.2.4 Tyre grip

To obtain the lateral load transfer from the inside tyres to the outside tyres

due to the centrifugal force during the cornering of the vehicle was very crucial in the

experiment for the proposed architectural layout. During the placement of the drive

train accessories of the vehicle, the lateral load distribution was not symmetric on the

left and right side. That is why the lateral position of CG also shifted slightly towards

left from the mid-point of the track width of the vehicle. As the transfer of lateral

load was a significant factor to regulate the grip of the tyre, the amount of load

transfer from the inside to outside tyres during left turning condition of the vehicle

was determined as shown in Figure 5-6.

Intended Path

Actual Path

Page 140: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

121

Figure 5-6: Lateral load transfer over time sec.

In the tyre grip calculation, the lateral acceleration with time and traction vs.

lateral load was used according to the full passenger road vehicles to consider the

worst situation for the analysis as shown in Figure 4-12. The grip of the tyre was

calculated from the ratio of the amount of traction produced by the tyre for the

corresponding vertical load. The calculated tyre grip over time was demonstrated in

Figure 5-7.

Figure 5-7: Tyre grip of the vehicle over time sec.

Page 141: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

122

5.2.5 Velocity and yaw rate

The longitudinal velocity, Vx and the lateral velocity, Vy was calculated

accordingly to the vehicle model as shown in Figure 4-7. The manoeuvring condition

considered for this calculation was sudden change in steering input of the vehicle.

The vehicle parameter and other specifications given as input in this model were

measured from the vehicle in the lab. For the calculated frontal area of the vehicle

and the given drag coefficient (Cd) depending on the vehicle dimension, the

aerodynamic force Fa was calculated as 12.46 N and the rolling resistance FR was

3.283 N. The steering input was given as shown in Figure 4-6. Based on calculated

Fa, FR and the forces on the tyre the longitudinal and lateral velocity (m/s) were

calculated as shown in Figure 5-8.

Figure 5-8: Vx & Vy (m/s Vs time sec.) accordingly for test vehicle

In case of the both Vx and Vy, the variation was noticed within 8 to 12 sec

time period due to the fluctuation in steering angle. The fluctuation noticed in the

trend of yaw rate was also at the same time period according to the steering input as

shown in Figure 5-9.

Figure 5-9: Yaw rate Vs time sec. for test vehicle

Page 142: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

123

5.2.1 Forces on tyres

To calculate the longitudinal, lateral and vertical forces on the tyres, a tyre

model was simulated following the Dugoff’s theory (Rajamani, 2006). In the

simulation the cornering stiffness Cα and the longitudinal stiffness Cσ of front and

rear tyres were given as input. The longitudinal force Fx and the lateral force Fy was

calculated from the equations stated below.

λ (5.8)

λ (5.9)

where,

λ / (5.10)

For λ a condition was applied in the simulation as, λ = (2-λ) for λ<1

and λ = 1 for λ≥1 (Rajamani, 2006). The assumptions for using Dugoff’s tyre

model were the uniform vertical pressure on the contact patch of the tyre measured

from the vehicle. The longitudinal and lateral forces (N) on each tyre were calculated

over time as shown in Figure 5-10 Figure 5-11 and Figure 5-12.

Figure 5-10: Longitudinal force, Fx (N) on each tyre over time sec.

Front left

Front right

Rear left

Rear right

Page 143: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

124

Figure 5-11: Lateral force, Fy (N) on each tyre over time sec.

The normal force on the tyre was calculated for front and rear tyre by taking

moments about the contact point of the corresponding tyre as explained in 4.3.2.2.

The Fzf and Fzr calculated for the test vehicle was shown in Figure 5-12.

Figure 5-12: Normal force Fzf and Fzr (N) on each tyre over time sec.

Front left

Front right

Rear left

Rear right

Page 144: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

125

5.2.2 Slip Ratio

For sudden change in manoeuvre the wheels experienced a significant

amount of slip. The slip was based on the effective radius of the vehicle which was

calculated from the contact patch measurement at the static loaded condition of the

vehicle in the lab. The angular velocity was calculated as shown in Figure 5-13.

Figure 5-13: Angular velocity rad/s over time sec.

The longitudinal slip, σx and lateral slip, σy was calculated for accelerating

condition. The total slip of the tyre was calculated by averaging the longitudinal and

lateral slip from the equation below as shown in Figure 5-14.

(5.11)

Figure 5-14: Total Slip, σ at front and rear tyre accordingly over time sec.

The value of slip for the complete sliding of the tyre, σm was calculated from

the equation 5.12 (Rajamani, 2006) below where the constant, θ was the function of

Page 145: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

126

tyre parameters and normal force and ‘k’ was the lateral stiffness of the tyre per unit

area from the relationship to the lateral stiffness per unit length ‘c’ as ‘k = c/2b’.

(5.12)

5.3 Analysis of dynamic results for the test vehicle The experimental data collected in the lab were given as input in the

simulation model to obtain the dynamic behaviour of the vehicle in both sudden

change in steering manoeuvre and cornering. In case of computing the turning radius

and the handling characteristics of the vehicle in cornering condition, experimental

set up was prepared and tested. During the path radius test, the vehicle was driven on

the defined track and the data collected by considering the driver weight. The other

experimental data such as contact patch, CG were collected considering the driver on

board, so that all the computational results could demonstrate the dynamic behaviour

in the same constraints.

According to the load distribution of the vehicle, the lateral load was not

symmetric from left and right side. From the polar moment calculation it was noticed

that the distance between the centre of weight concentration and the position of CG

was very small (0.06 m) which referred to the stable condition while cornering. The

results found both from simulation and experimental set up were summarized in the

Table 5-6.

Table 5-6: Summery of computational and experimental results for test vehicle

Dynamic Characteristics Proposed Layout

Lateral Load Transfer(kg) 197.4

Traction (kg) 175.2

Tyre Grip 0.8879

Polar Moment (kg-m) 20

Slip Angle ratio (Front/Rear) 0.89

Path Radius (m) 3.7

Handling Neutral (Slight Oversteer)

Page 146: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

127

5.3.1 Analysis based on cornering dynamics

In the cornering dynamic behaviour analysis, the turning radius of the vehicle

was calculated for a given steering angle and speed. It was then compared with the

theoretical circular path of the vehicle. The intended path radius of the circular track

was 4 m and the average radius of the actual path followed by the vehicle while

driving on the defined course in the lab was 3.7 m. The actual path radius was found

very close to the intended path radius. The actual path was smaller than the intended

path though the difference was not very significant. The actual curvilinear path was

not maintaining the same radius at all points of the path. In that course, two paths

were merging at some points and maintaining distance at some points. The

computational result of the vehicle trajectory also demonstrated the actual path

smaller than the intended as shown in Figure 5-5. The experimental and computational

simulation results presented the similar behaviour in cornering dynamics. In the both

cases, the handling characteristics of the vehicle were demonstrated as slight

oversteering and tend to neutral steering. Moreover, the front and rear slip angle

ratios was found 0.89 which was very close to 1. It referred to the similar vehicle

handling characteristic as tends to neutral with slight oversteering.

The maximum lateral load transfer from the inside to outside tyres while

turning left was calculated as 197.4 kg. The amount of load transfer in the lateral

direction was found big, because the vehicle was loaded more to the left side than the

right. Due to the centrifugal force acting while turning left, the left tyres were the

inside tyres of the curve. The tyre grip depending on the load on the tyre over time

was calculated as shown in Figure 5-7. The minimum grip was found 0.8879 and the

traction generated for the corresponding vertical load on the tyre was 175.2 kg.

5.3.2 Analysis based on tyre model

To develop the Dugoff’s tyre model in sudden manoeuvring change, the

components of the model were calculated using the simulation presented in Figure

4-4 and Figure 4-7.

The longitudinal and lateral velocity was calculated as 19.2 m/s and 0.55 m/s

accordingly. The results found for lateral velocity referred to the unstable condition

Page 147: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

128

of the vehicle due to the asymmetric load distribution in the lateral direction. The

yaw rate calculated was also referred to the instability in driving condition of the

vehicle, but not very significant as shown in Figure 5-9.

The longitudinal and lateral slip ratio (σx and σy) were calculated in sudden

steering change condition. From σx and σy the value of the total slip was calculated as

0.21 at front and 0.195 at rear tyres. Then the slip value (σm) for complete sliding of

the tyre was calculated and compared with the total slip (σ). The value of σ was

found lower than σm which referred to that total slip developed in the tyre was in the

limit. The maximum force F would be lower than the value of µFz. The maximum

slip occurs at the point when the maximum force developed in the tyre due to the

road-tyre friction as shown in the theory (Pacejka).

The longitudinal, lateral and vertical forces were calculated from the tyre

model developed for sudden manoeuvre. Among all the tyres, the maximum Fx and

Fy was generated at front left tyre due to the maximum vertical load on that tyre.

From the result of the normal force generated at front and rear tyre, it was noticeable

that the maximum force was generated also at front left tyre.

From the analysis results, it was established that the proposed architectural

layout was suitable for retrofitting of the electric vehicle based on the vehicle

handling and dynamic stability behaviour in different manoeuvring conditions.

5.4 Simulation of Toyota Camry based on proposed layout At this stage, the proposed layout was applied in the simulation of Toyota

Camry and compared the results with the front and mid loaded layout outcomes in

terms of vehicle dynamic characteristics.

Load distribution and calculation of CG were calculated for Toyota Camry

considering the proposed layout in section 4.6.1.2 and 4.6.1.3. The load distribution

was found as 55:45 and CG as shown in Table 4-7. These calculation results were

applied in the vehicle dynamic simulation for Toyota Camry as input data. The

substantial dynamic characteristics were analysed and compared with the front and

mid loaded layout results in the Table 5-7.

Page 148: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

129

Table 5-7: Comparison of proposed layout with front and mid loaded layout

Front-loaded Layout Mid-loaded Layout Proposed Layout

Vx (m/s) 18.64 18.35 18.58

Vy (m/s) 0.16 0.12 0.138

Front/Rear

Slip 2.15/0.015 2.13/0.018 2.11/0.0155

Drag

Force (N) 141.22 137.1 134.4

Vehicle

Trajectory

Slip Angle

Ratio (Front/

Rear)

0.82 0.95 0.9

Tyre Grip 0.59 0.6 0.598

Comparison in Table 5-7 demonstrated the significant characteristics of the

vehicle dynamic analysis in case of front loaded, mid loaded and proposed load

distribution layout. Analysis in chapter 4 showed the mid loaded layout as the most

suitable solution for retrofitting considering the dynamic behaviour of the vehicle.

The vehicle trajectory shown in Table 5-7 presented that the handling behaviour of

retrofitted Toyota Camry with the proposed load distribution layout smoother than

other layouts and the actual curved path was very close to the intended path of the

vehicle. These characteristics refer to the neutral handling of the vehicle. The rear

tyre slip for the proposed layout was found smaller than that of mid loaded layout

which refers to the better stability of the vehicle. The velocity of the vehicle in the y

(lateral) direction was found close to that of mid loaded layout which also refers to

the balanced stability of the vehicle in sudden change in steering. With the proposed

load distribution of the vehicle the aerodynamic drag force was found minimum. The

tyre grip was also found very close to that of mid loaded layout. The front and rear

Intended

Path

Actual Path

Intended

Path

Actual Path

Intended

Path

Actual Path

Page 149: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

130

slip angle ratio was tended to 1 which refers to good dynamic handling of the

vehicle.

5.5 Findings The proposed load distribution layout was initiated by considering the

dynamic behaviour of the vehicle in sudden change in steering and cornering

conditions and to obtain the proper utilization of the space available in the existing

vehicle. The focus of this analysis was to get an optimum load distribution for the

retrofitting of the vehicle. The simulation and experiment were concentrated on the

feasibility of the proposed load distribution layout which involved 60% of the battery

pack in the front bay and the rest 40% packaged in the mid area of the vehicle under

the passenger seats. To check the feasibility of the proposal, the experiment and

simulation model were implemented in case of a test vehicle parameter and

evaluated. The proposed load distribution layout produced the acceptable results both

in simulation and experiment set up. Then the proposed layout was applied on

Toyota Camry to compare the dynamic behaviour of the vehicle with other load

distribution layouts. The results were compared with the front and mid loaded layout.

The comparison found the enhancement of the vehicle dynamic performance due to

the change in load distribution. The proposed load distribution layout in Toyota

Camry was found dynamically more stable and steady manoeuvre both in sudden

steering input and cornering conditions. The further study on designing the

packaging and cooling arrangement for the battery pack, structural and thermal

analysis of that was accomplished considering the proposed load distribution layout

of the vehicle.

Page 150: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

131

CHAPTER 6

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF BATTERY

PACKAGING

The design of packaging arrangement of the battery was an important concern

of this research on EV retrofitting. The total battery pack was proposed to be

distributed into two locations as demonstrated in section 4.6.1. In this condition, the

packaging design of the battery faced a challenge due to the divided installing

arrangement of the pack. The design criteria of battery packaging arrangement

included the weather protection, the packaging for the super-controller and the

battery management system, the cooling system. Among these accessories, the

cooling system was the most important component in the design as it was required to

be installed with the battery pack. The crucial design constraint of the cooling system

was the selection of medium of the cooling. One of the limitations in retrofitting was

the space for assembling the battery packs in an EV. Hence, the liquid cooling

system was chosen for this study because of its compactness. Moreover, literature

review revealed that liquid cooling system was more effective than air cooling

system in terms of space and efficiency as discussed in section 2.5.1. In case of

retrofitting existing radiator was kept to be used for cooling. But ducting

arrangement for this system was an expensive and complicated design consideration,

as the battery pack was planned to be divided into two units and ducting was required

from the radiator in the front bay to the battery unit in the mid area.

This chapter focuses on the design of the packaging arrangement and the

cooling system for the battery pack. The design includes the CAD model and the

structural analysis results.

The safety analysis of this cooling system was required due to the liquid

coolant involved with the battery pack. To ensure the structural safety of the design it

Page 151: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

132

was required to be verified in a vehicle crash situation. To verify the structural

feasibility of the design, the vehicle crash was simulated to obtain the force,

displacement and stress experienced at the location of the battery pack during the

crash. At the conceptual stage of the design, a number of design targets and criteria

were considered. The cooling pipes were selected by following the Australian

standard for square hollow sections and the ducting arrangement of the cooling pipes

were proposed to be around the battery pack. To check the feasibility of the design,

two geometries for the design iterations were created. After the analysis, these two

design iterations were compared based on weight, overall size, equivalent stress and

deformation due to the force developed during the crash of the vehicle.

6.1 Conceptual design In conceptual design stage, the target was to combine different design criteria

to suit a range of performance requirements. Different design steps, inter-

dependencies among them and flow of the design process which characterize the

system holistically including both parallel and sequential interacting channels were

experienced in this stage in designing the cooling system of the battery.

Collaborating different design targets and accommodating the load distribution

proposal were the basic approach towards the conceptual design. The initial concept

was to design structurally safe cooling system for the battery pack. Then the concept

was clustered according to different requirements such as the feasibility of the design

during the crash of the vehicle, different design options to create different iterations.

These clusters were then categorized and scrutinized in order to devise a particular

description of each cluster. The process of the analysis was then formulated which is

demonstrated in the framework (Figure 6-1).

Page 152: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

133

Figure 6-1: Process flowchart of structural safety analysis of the battery packaging and cooling

arrangement

6.1.1 Design targets

In the conceptual design stage of the battery packaging arrangement, the

requirements of retrofitting of EV came into account. The space and volume required

for the design, the weight of the total arrangement, material used for this, the position

of the package to accommodate the pump and piping for the cooling system, the

durability of the design while experiencing the crash of the vehicle were the main

concerns in the design. To simplify the conceptual design of the battery packaging

arrangement, manufacturing considerations such as installing difficulties,

manufacturing techniques, number of components etc. was not taken under

consideration in defining the design targets. Easy setup of the arrangement was

considered during the design. Hence there were two main considerations in the

conceptual design stage which were:

Page 153: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

134

The design was to structurally survive the displacement, force and stress

generated during the vehicle - crash

The design was to operate in the heat generation due to the battery charging

and discharging

6.1.2 Geometry Definition

The increase of temperature, location of the hot spots, crucial parameters of

battery configuration, size, overall dimensions, the location of winding cooling pipes

or ducts were considered to define the geometry of the battery packaging

arrangement design. According to the literature review, the coolant pipes were not

sufficiently effective while placed at the bottom of the battery pack as the maximum

temperature was experienced near the TAB at the top of the battery. Moreover, the

cooling pipes could not be placed at the top due to the electrical hazards. So, the

piping arrangement was decided to be at the surroundings of the battery pack. To

enhance the cooling efficiency of the system the piping was around each battery unit.

The size of the piping was a crucial consideration due to the limited space available

for the battery pack. The overall dimensions of the Li-ion phosphate battery chosen

for retrofitting were as shown in Table 6-1.

Table 6-1: Outer dimensions of Li-Ion phosphate battery

Lithium Ion Phosphate Battery

Thickness [mm] 333

Length [mm] 615

Width [mm] 265

Weight [kg] 65

Some of the commercial battery packs consisted of channels at the outer

surface of the battery unit. These channels were used to place the ducting around the

unit. The thickness of the cooling pipe was another important consideration for the

geometry definition of the design. To decide this in conceptual stage, the data was

collected from the market about the standard piping dimensions. Structural cold

formed square hollow section of grade 350 was selected for which the sectional

Page 154: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

135

properties were calculated in accordance with AS1250 (Australian Standard 1250,

Amendment no. 2).

6.1.3 Design Options

Two design options were considered in this case. Two different dimensions

of the cooling pipe were applied as design parameters. The weight of the cooling

system was an important factor for this design. Two different pipe dimensions of

grade 350 (Standard) were selected for two design options as given below.

Figure 6-2: Hollow square sections of the cooling pipe

Table 6-2: Sectional properties of Grade 350 (AU standard) steel

Dimensions Sectional Properties Design Values

d

mm

b

mm

t

mm

Nominal

mass

(kg/m)

Ext.

surface

area

(m2/m)

Ix

Gross

(106mm4)

Torsion

Constant,

J Gross

(106mm4)

Torsion

modulus

C Gross

(103mm3)

Yield

Stress

Fy

(MPa)

Ratio in

AS1250

2

Rule 4.3.2

20 20 1.6 0.873 0.0745 0.00608 0.0103 0.924 350 10.5

15 15 1.8 0.681 0.0538 0.00239 0.00431 0.491 350 6.33

Page 155: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

136

The dimension ‘r’, corner radius of the section in the figure was applied as

‘2t’ according to the standard rule for sections with t ≤ 3mm. The design model with

pipe dimension 20x20x1.6 mm was denoted as design iteration 1 and the pipe

dimension 15x15x1.8 mm was denoted as design iteration 2.

6.1.4 Vehicle Crash Simulation

The crash test of the vehicle was simulated to get the stress developed at the

location of the battery packaging arrangement. A frontal impact test was simulated

by considering the outer shell and the chassis of the vehicle so that the stress

developed can be obtained from the finite element analysis.

The crash test was done using Ansys LS-DYNA (Mechanical APDL). To

simplify the crash test module, only vehicle outer shell and chassis were used by

removing the wheels, axles, seats and other accessories. A concrete wall was placed

in front of the vehicle and an impact velocity was applied in the vehicle initially. The

crash was prepared as a full-frontal barrier test. The material properties of the barrier

were given concrete (as given in Table 6-3) and the vehicle parts were steel.

Table 6-3: Material properties of concrete

Material Properties of concrete block

Density 2240 - 2400 kg/m3

Compressive strength 20 - 40 MPa

Flexural strength 3 - 5 MPa

Tensile strength 2 - 5 MPa

Modulus of elasticity 14000 - 41000 MPa

Permeability 1 x 10-10 cm/sec

Coefficient of thermal expansion 10-5 oC-1

Drying shrinkage 4 - 8 x 10-4

Drying shrinkage of reinforced concrete 2 - 3 x 10-4

Poisson's ratio 0.20 - 0.21

Shear strength 6 - 17 MPa

Specific heat capacity 0.75 kJ/kg K

Page 156: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

137

6.1.4.1 Boundary Conditions and Governing Equations

In this simulation, two types of contact and element formulation were

applied. One was node to node and another was node to surface. For node to node

EINTF type of mesh applied and the sliding of contact were small. To maintain near

zero penetration and slip, the Lagrange multiplier’s method was used for contacts

formulation (SESHU, 2003). This method was chosen to simplify the simulation by

avoiding dealing with the contact stiffness.

(6.1)

For the time discretization, the dynamic equation of motion was applied with

the integration of time t according to the explicit finite difference time integration

method denoting the acceleration, velocity and displacement.

(6.2)

/ / ∆ (6.3)

/ ∆ / (6.4)

where, = External nodal loads = Internal nodal loads

1/2, n, 1/2 = consecutive times ∆ = Time steps.

6.1.4.2 Nodal force, displacement and stress during the crash test

The outer shell and the chassis of the vehicle were modeled using

SolidWorks (Figure 6-3) and imported into ANSYS mechanical APDL module. Free

quad mesh was applied to the model. Material properties and other attributes were

entered into the system. Total time of the simulation was 0.5 sec. The concrete wall

was modeled using a single shell element and its velocity was set to zero. The initial

impact velocity of 18 m/s was applied to all nodes of the vehicle outer shell and

chassis.

Page 157: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

138

Figure 6-3: CAD model of the Outer shell and Chassis for the specification of Toyota Camry

The nodal displacement, pressure and the stress developed were obtained

from the simulation. The nodes were detected from the K-file of the analysis results

according to the coordinates. The selected nodes were close to the front bay of the

vehicle as the battery arrangement at the front area was decided to be analyzed in

ANSYS transient structural module. Result file provided the X, Y and Z values of

displacement, force, rotation or moment in the coordinate system in accordance with

the selected nodes. In total 3 nodal time history outputs were defined which gave the

time history information on displacement and force transferred through the nodes.

The nodal force generated from the mechanical APDL module was given in Figure

6-4.

Page 158: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

139

Figure 6-4: Nodal forces generated at 3 defined nodes with time

At the beginning of the simulation the system energy balance was checked to

ensure the stability of the solution. The time histories for the total energy in the

global system were found constant for the simulation.

The nodal displacement obtained in the crash simulation was shown in Figure

6-5 .

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0 20 40 60 80 100

Forc

e (K

N)

Time (milisec.)

Node 1 Force (KN)

Node 2 Force (KN)

Node 3 Force (KN)

Page 159: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

140

Figure 6-5: Nodal displacement in meshed view of the vehicle

The stress developed at initial stage t = 0 and at time t = 20 millisecond were

plotted. In the contour plot (Figure 6-6) the maximum effective stress were shown.

The nodal force obtained from this crash simulation was imported into the

transient structural analysis module. The total deformation, equivalent stress (Von-

mises) and safety factor were analyzed in case of two cooling pipe dimensions.

Page 160: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

141

Figure 6-6: Contours of effective stress (v-m) at time

6.1.5 Design Model

For the two pipe dimensions two CAD model were created to perform the

structural analysis. The channel dimension surrounding the existing commercial

battery was found 20 mm in height and 10 mm in depth. Two dimensions of the

cooling pipes were chosen by considering this channel dimension. The thickness of

the outer casing was given 5 mm. The space required to fit this pack inside the front

bay of the vehicle was verified by taking the measurement from the existing vehicle

Toyota Camry Attara S year 2012 model on site. While verifying the space available

inside the front bay, the dimensions of the super controller and battery management

Page 161: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

142

system was also considered. The CAD models were created using Solidworks as

shown in Figure 6-7.

Figure 6-7: CAD model created using SolidWorks

6.2 Mathematical model for the transient structural analysis The design was considered as nonlinear structural dynamics as the internal

load was not proportional to the nodal displacement and also the structural matrix

was dependant on this displacement. The nodal displacement was generated from the

dynamic crash simulation of the vehicle. Moreover, the temperature profile of the

battery packs according to the time was used as input value in the analysis. To

combine the time steps with these mathematical constraints, a generalized HHT-α

form of the time integration operator was used which was obtained from the Newton-

Raphson method (Hughes., 1987). The nonlinear equations of motion for transient

structural analysis used here are given below:

∆ 0 (6.5)

Page 162: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

143

1 ∆ (6.6)

where, [M] = Structural mass matrix [C] = Structural damping matrix u(t) = Nodal displacement vector

=

=

∆ = The displacement increment of (un+1) at the kth iterations = The residual vector

6.3 Computational Analysis The primary requirement of the computational analysis in time integrated

structural analysis was to ensure the convergence of the governing algorithms. The

rate of convergence of the algorithm was dependant on consistency and stability of

the characteristics defining the algorithm. The proper definition of these

characteristics was very significant to obtain the quality of the convergence. The

material properties, the meshing and the boundary conditions were defined in detail

here to describe the behaviour of the computation.

6.3.1 Material Properties

The design was involved with three different types of components.

Battery

Pipe

Casing

The material assigned for the battery was aluminium alloy. The mechanical

properties of the material are given below:

Table 6-4: Mechanical properties of Aluminum Alloy

Density 2770 kg/m3

Modulus of Elasticity 68.9 GPa

Poisson’s ratio 0.33

Tensile yield strength 276 MPa

Bearing yield strength 386 MPa

Shear Strength 207 MPa

Page 163: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

144

The casing component was supressed to simplify the analysis part. The

material assigned to the cooling pipes was structural steel of grade 350 according to

the Australian standard. The mechanical properties of this material are given in Table

6-5.

Table 6-5: Mechanical properties of Grade 350 steel

Density 7850 kg/m3

Young’s Modulus 2e+05 MPa

Poisson’s ratio 0.33

Tensile yield strength 250 MPa

Compressive yield strength 250 MPa

6.3.2 Meshing

Mesh generation was an important factor for this analysis due to the pipe and

the battery contacts. The tetrahedral mesh was applied in this analysis. The

tetrahedral mesh provided the ability to add mesh controls at the critical zones. To

avoid the impairment during the run-time with the high element count and unsmooth

mesh shape, the refinement was applied to the critical places near the contacts of the

battery and the cooling pipes. The connectivity of the mesh was maintained

automatically. Figure 6-8 showed the tetrahedral mesh of the structure.

Page 164: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

145

Figure 6-8: Tetrahedral mesh of the structure

6.3.3 Boundary Conditions

6.3.3.1 Battery Temperature with time steps

There were 4 time steps used to represent the change of temperature of the

pack. The temperature profile followed the operating temperature of the battery pack

while charging and discharging. Three different temperature profiles were assigned

to three battery packs to create the operating environment of the battery. The range of

temperature change of the pack was considered as 0-45º C within 20 sec as shown in

Figure 6-9.

Page 165: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

146

Figure 6-9: Temperature of the battery pack with time

6.4 Results

In the model analysis settings, the time steps and the total duration of the

analysis were applied following the time steps showed in the temperature profile of

the battery packs. The material properties were applied to the respective components

of the model. Here, bolted and welded parts of the structure were defined at this stage

as fixed supports. The thermal condition was inserted to apply the battery pack

temperature profile. Then the nodal forces obtained from the crash analysis were

inserted into the analysis system. The direction of the force was from the front of the

vehicle as demonstrated in the crash simulation. The nodes were defined considering

the coordinates of the vehicle.

6.4.1 Total deformation

Total deformation of this structure was caused by the temperature changes of

the battery pack. Total deformation of the structure defines the strain developed due

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

0 5 10 15 20 25

Tem

pera

ture

[°C

]

Time (s)

Temperature [˚C] pack 1

Temperature [˚C] pack 2

Temperature [˚C] pack 3

Page 166: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

147

to the thermal conditions in this case. Strain was the expression of deformation in

terms of relative displacement of particles in the body that excluded rigid-body

motions. In the continuous structure, deformation field was resulted from

a stress field induced by changes in the temperature field inside the body. Figure 6-10

showed the total deformation experienced in design iteration 2.

Figure 6-10: Total deformation in design iteration 2

6.4.2 Equivalent stress

Equivalent stress (Von Mises) criterion was based on the determination of

distortion energy in given material. According to this stress criterion, a given

structural material was safe as long as the maximum value of the distortion energy

per unit volume in that material remains smaller than the distortion energy per unit

volume required to cause yield in a tensile test specified of the same material which

is young’s modulus of the material (Kazimi, 2001). Von-Mises stress is defined as

the equation 6.7 below:

Page 167: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

148

3 (6.7)

where, = Von-Mises Stress = Tensile yield stress of the structural material.

Figure 6-11 and Figure 6-12 showed the stress developed in design iteration 1

and 2 due to the force applied to the two models with different pipe dimensions.

Figure 6-11: Stress (Pa) developed in design iteration 1

Figure 6-12: Stress (Pa) developed in design iteration 2

Maximum stress generated at the joint of the coolant pipe to the packaging of the battery pack in both design iterations.

Page 168: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

149

6.5 Discussion In figure, the total deformation found for design iteration 2 was 0.2 mm

maximum which was not very significant. This referred to the compatibility of the

design under the effect of the force generated during the frontal impact in accordance

with the thermal condition of the battery pack. The design model was also suitable

for this layout of the vehicle while considering the total deformation occurred in this

condition.

Figure 6-11 demonstrated the equivalent stress developed due to the impact

force and temparature changes of the pack for the design iteration 1 and 2. Most of

the surface area experienced 356.59 pa and 400.34 pa stress accordingly in case of

design iteration 1 and 2 but some coordinates were facing significant amount of

stress in this design. Some areas as shown in figure faced a large amount of stress in

this analysis.

In case of the equivalent Von-Mises stress analysis, the amount of stress

developed in iteration 1 was more than that of iteration 2. The maximum stress

developed in both case was found at the outer surface of the coolant pipe. The depth

of the channel at the main body of the battery was 10 mm and the dimension of the

square sections cooling pipe were 20 and 15 mm accordingly for iteration 1 and 2.

The iteration 1 experienced more stress due to the less support of the main body of

the battery than the iteration 2.

6.6 Findings A comparison model was established for design iteration 1 and 2 as shown in

Table 6-6. Sectional properties of the selected pipe as the geometry model, weight of

the battery packaging and cooling arrangement, volume of the coolant fluid flow

through the pipe, total elastic deformation found for the vehicle crash load and

equivalent stress of the design model considering the crash of the vehicle were

compared here. The comparison of two design iterations demonstrated the selection

process of the pipe dimension for the battery cooling system.

Page 169: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

150

Table 6-6: Comparison between two design iterations

Criteria Design Iteration 1 Design Iteration 2

Pipe Section 20x20x1.6 mm 15x15x1.8 mm

Weight 4539.13 g 3829.25 g

Volume 578233.29 mm3 409182.31 mm3

Total Deformation 0.146 mm 0.2 mm

Equivalent Stress Min – 400.34 pa Min – 356.59 pa

Max – 8.12e9 pa Max – 7.82e9 pa

The comparison model revealed that the design iteration 2 was a better choice

in terms of weight and space required to install. But the volume of design iteration 1

was more suitable for the coolant flow because it allowed more mass volume of fluid

flow through the pipe. The larger volume of coolant flow would enhance the

efficiency of the cooling system. Moreover, the surface area of the design iteration 1

was bigger than the iteration 2 which referred to a wider contact area for heat transfer

from the cooling liquid to the battery at the fluid solid interface. The volumetric flow

rate was considered as a product of flow velocity and the cross sectional area. So the

iteration 1 referred to a bigger volumetric flow rate for the coolant due to the bigger

cross sectional area of the pipe.

Table 6-6 demonstrated that the design iteration 1 experienced less

deformation in the structure than the iteration 2. In the CAD model it was noticeable

that the design iteration 1 had an interference fit in contacts between the outer

surface of the cooling pipe and the channel surface surrounding the battery. In total

deformation analysis of iteration 2 it was found that the outer surface of the cooling

pipe faced maximum deformation due to the gap.

By taking the consideration of the rate of efficiency of the cooling system

and the structural safety of the model, the design iteration 1 was chosen for the

computational fluid flow analysis to obtain the workability of the cooling system.

Page 170: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

151

CHAPTER 7

THERMAL ANALYSIS OF BATTERY

COOLING SYSTEM

Electrification of vehicle was explained as the most viable way to achieve

clean and environmentally friendly transportation according to the literature review.

In the near future, EVs including hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), plug-in hybrid

electric vehicles (PHEVs), and full battery electric vehicles (BEVs) were expected to

lead the emission free vehicle market. In this demanding automobile industry,

retrofitting of EVs would be considered as a rapid solution in meeting the target. In

case of all of these green solutions, battery was the most important factor. The

assembly and packaging of the battery was the most concerning factor for retrofitting

of EVs. Energy storing capacity of the battery was considered as the basic regulating

aspect of the range of EV and battery performance depends on the operating

temperature of the battery while charging and discharging. The performance of a

battery changes with its operating conditions (temperature, charging or discharging

current, state of charge (SOC), etc.) and its service time vary as discussed in section

2.4.1. In order to increase the power density of battery cells, it is required to

investigate battery packs for various characteristics of battery management system

(BMS) as example the temperature of the battery.

This chapter focuses on the thermal analysis of the battery cooling system

which was demonstrated in section 6.1.5. The literature review focused on the air-

cooled and liquid cooled system as discussed in section 2.5.1. The liquid coolant was

chosen to be the medium of cooling in this research due to the compactness and

efficiency of the system. The radiator of the existing vehicle was planned to be used

for the cooling of the battery pack. The proposed cooling circuit of the battery pack

consisted of the battery outlet (hot liquid) connected to the radiator inlet and after

Page 171: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

152

passing through the moderate air-cooled radiator, the liquid (air-cooled) was returned

to the battery pack inlet. To obtain more efficiency from the cooling system, the

existing air-conditioning system of the vehicle was proposed to be used. A by-pass

circuit was designed for the liquid coolant to flow from the battery outlet to the

battery inlet through the AC heat exchanger. The proposed cooling circuit of the

battery pack was demonstrated in Figure 7-1.

Figure 7-1: Cooling Circuit in the front bay

In the AC heat exchanger the cooling temperature needed to be monitored

and regulated so that the temperature of the liquid coolant would drop below the

standard range of suitable temperature required for the proper operating condition of

the battery. A temperature sensor was planned to be installed at the battery inlet. To

regulate the coolant temperature, a modification to the main cooling circuit was

proposed to apply where the maximum amount of coolant would be travelled through

the moderate heat exchanger. A by-pass channel would be fitted through the AC heat

exchanger and the flow through it would be controlled depending on the required

temperature of the coolant. The impact of the liquid cooling system on the battery

Page 172: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

153

pack temperature of a retrofitted vehicle was investigated. This study included a

novel design of cooling arrangement and analysed the design model to obtain the

results data regarding the thermal behaviour of the battery pack. By using these data

BMS would more efficiently prevent the over or under temperature of the pack and it

might actively ensure that all the cells were kept at the same SOC, through

balancing.

The liquid cooling system of the battery pack was analysed using ANSYS.

CAD model is imported to ANSYS Geometry module. Figure 7-2 shows the flow

chart of the simulation process.

Figure 7-2: Simulation Process used in FSI analysis

The basic system of the fluid-solid interface analysis was the impact of the

steady state flow of the coolant of given temperature and velocity on the transient

state temperature of the battery pack. To create the fluid solid interface two modules

of ANSYS analysis system were coupled together. Those are Fluid Flow (CFX) and

Transient Thermal. For this, steady state fluid flow was analysed in ANSYS CFX

Page 173: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

154

and the body temperature of the fluid was imported in the transient thermal module

to obtain the temperature of the battery pack.

7.1 Battery Pack Configuration To meet the required power of the vehicle, the equivalent battery

configuration and number of pack was calculated. The rated ampere hour (Ah) was

considered as the nominal capacity of a fully charged new battery under the

conditions predefined by the battery manufacturers. The nominal condition defined

for the selected batteries was 20ºC ambient temperature and 1/20 C discharging rate.

The rated capacity (wh) was calculated from the relationship as:

Rated wh Capacity = Rated Ah Capacity × Rated Battery Voltage

Specific energy of the battery was considered as the key parameter for

determining the total battery weight for a given mileage of EV. The specific energy

and the specific power of the battery were calculated from the relationships below:

Specific Energy = Rated Wh Capacity/ Battery Mass in kg

Specific power = Rated peak power/Battery Mass in kg

Power density of the pack (the peak power per unit volume of the battery,

W/I) was 0.46 kw/kg and weight of each pack was 65 kg, which determined 5 battery

packs for the selected vehicle parameter (Toyota CAMRY). Battery packaging in

mid and front portion of the vehicle was considered here according to the proposed

architectural layout of the retrofitted vehicle. 25 battery cells were planned to be

assembled in total 5 battery packs from which 3 packs were to be packaged in the

front bay of the vehicle and 2 packs in the mid area under the passenger seat.

Table 7-1: Battery Configuration for EV retrofitting

Lithium Ion Phosphate Battery

Rated Voltage [V] 3.2

Rated Capacity [Ah] 100

Power Density [kw/kg] ≥ 0.46

Cycle Life [1C Amplification] ≥ 2500 times

Operate Temperature

Charge 0~40˚C

Discharge -20~50˚C

Storage -20~40˚C

Page 174: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

155

7.2 Mathematical Model The coolant fluid flow was in a steady state. The initial pressure and

temperature of the fluid was given. The data from the flow stream was then inserted

into the solid battery structure in transient thermal module where the coupling of the

fluid and solid structure occurred. The basic approach consisted of using the standard

viscous flow equation for constant thermal conductivity and heat capacity of the

fluid. The continuity equation of the fluid flow (White, 1991, H.Versteeg, 2007)

from the law of mass conservation was:

0 (7.1)

where, vx, vy and vz = components of the velocity vector ρ = Fluid density

In case of a Newtonian fluid, the momentum equation stated the relationship

of the stress tensor, orthogonal velocities, dynamic viscosity as a fluid property,

second coefficient of viscosity and the divergence of the velocity (Amsden., 1971).

As the coolant was a constant density fluid, the product of second coefficient of

viscosity and the divergence of the velocity became zero. The momentum equation

for the turbulent fluid flow transformed to the Reynold’s averaged Navier-Stokes

equation (White, 1991, Allmaras., February 1992) as:

(7.2)

(7.3)

Page 175: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

156

(7.4)

where, gx, gy, gz = components of acceleration due to gravity μe = Effective viscosity Rx, Ry, Rz = Distributed resistances Tx, Ty, Tz = viscous loss terms P = pressure R = gas constant T = temperature

In terms of the total (or stagnation) temperature, the energy equation

considered was:

Φ (7.5)

where, Cp = specific heat To = total (or stagnation) temperature K = thermal conductivity Wv = viscous work Qv = volumetric heat source Φ = viscous heat generation term Ek = kinetic energy

Standard k-epsilon turbulent flow was used in this analysis. The turbulent

kinetic energy equation (Spalding., 1974) was:

Φ ρϵ (7.6)

The governing equation for the dissipation rate equation was:

(7.7)

Page 176: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

157

Table 7-2: Standard Model Coefficients

Model Coefficients Default Value

C1, C1ε 1.44

C2 1.92

Cμ 0.09

σk 1.0

σε 1.3

σt 0.85

C3 1.0

C4 0

β 0

7.2.1 Fluid Structure Interaction

The interaction of the fluid and the solid structure at a mesh interface was

applied to the wall of the coolant pipe where the temperature of the fluid was acting

as an input load and the impact of that temperature flow on the solid structure. The

finite element matrix used here to analyse the interface (P. Chen, 1998, (6)) was as

given below:

(7.8)

= (7.9)

Coupling matrix [R] referred to the effective surface area associated with

each FSI node. The load quantities of the fluid and solid structure generated at the

interface surface area were the functions of the nodal degrees of freedom. By adding

these load quantities with the above equations the finite element matrix equation was

formed as given below:

0 0 (7.10)

Page 177: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

158

7.3 Computational Analysis 7.3.1 Material Properties

Coolant properties used in this study were set by considering constant values

independent of temperature change of the fluid as shown in Table 7-3.

Table 7-3: Material Properties of the coolant

Phase Liquid

Thermal Conductivity 0.405 W/(m.K)

Heat Capacity 3300 J/(kg.K)

Density 1078 kg/m3

Heat Ratio 1

Viscosity 0.00429 pa.s

The material used for the solid structure of the battery was Aluminium Alloy.

The density of the aluminium alloy was considered constant within the temperature

range considered here. The thermal properties of this material were as shown in

Table 7-4.

Table 7-4: Thermal properties of aluminum alloy

Specific heat capacity 0.896 J/g-ºC

Melting point 582 – 652 ºC

Electrical Resistivity 3.99e-006 ohm-cm

The given thermal conductivity of the material was as demonstrated in the

Figure 7-3.

Figure 7-3: Thermal Conductivity data of Aluminum Alloy

Page 178: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

159

7.3.2 Geometry

Geometry of the battery cooling system was created based on the structural

safety analysis. The selected pipe dimension of the design was 20x20x1.6 mm

hollow square section. Geometry of the battery pack cooling system was modelled in

Solidworks and imported in ANSYS CFX geometry modeller. As the battery units

were divided into 2 sets, only one set with 3 battery units was designed and analysed

in this study. Piping arrangement for the coolant was modelled surrounding the

battery units to get the maximum output. The coolant pipe consisted of single

entrance and exit to simplify the model and the pressure distribution. This single

entrance and exit set up also simplified the arrangement of the coolant flow

accessories such as the coolant pump and other related components.

Figure 7-4: CAD model of battery cooling system

Page 179: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

160

At the conceptual design stage, different positions for the cooling pipes were

taken under consideration. The most heat generating point of the battery pack was

near the TAB on the top where all the wires were connected to the BMS. The most

effective position of the cooling pipe arrangement would be near the TAB. But there

were some safety concerns to install the liquid cooling pipes close to the TAB as

there were risks of leakage. Literature review demonstrated the arrangement of the

cooling pipe at the bottom of the pack. However, in that case the maximum heat

generating area near the TAB was kept far from the cooling arrangement. Hence,

cooling arrangement was designed covering the circumference of each battery pack

so that the most effective cooling rate can be achieved.

In the CFD analysis, only the cooling pipe was considered and the solid

model of the battery was supressed to simplify the analysis. After importing the CAD

model into ANSYS design modeller, regions have been divided by selecting the

surfaces of the CAD model. Then the regions were grouped into solid and fluid part.

Figure 7-5: Flow path of coolant through the pipe

Page 180: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

161

7.3.3 Meshing

Mapped face meshing was applied to mesh the coolant fluid for the flow

analysis and solid battery pack with the coolant pipe for the transient thermal

analysis. In the turning region of the coolant, refinement has been applied to get the

better results with the fluid flow.

Figure 7-6: General Mesh of the Design Model

Figure 7-7: Mapped Face meshing with refinement for the coolant pipe

Page 181: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

162

The mesh was then checked for errors and the mesh independence test was

accomplished. For the convergence criteria of the analysis the residual type was

RMS and the target was 1.E-4 to 1.E-5.

Figure 7-8 and Figure 7-9 demonstrated the mesh independence test results in

terms of residual error and domain imbalance convergence in case of meshing with

refinement.

Figure 7-8: RMS target value with time sec.

At first, the mesh was done ensuring the convergence of the residual error to

1.E-4. After the first design iteration, the global refinement to the initial mesh size

was applied. Global refinement was chosen to have the finer cells throughout the

domain. The refinement was around 1.4 times of the initial mesh size. With this

Page 182: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

163

refinement, the convergence of the residual error dropped below 1.E-4 and the

domain presented the imbalances below 1%.

Figure 7-9: Domain imbalance with time sec. for refined mesh

7.3.4 Boundary Conditions

7.3.4.1 Fluid temperature

Heat transfer system of the fluid was selected as isothermal for this analysis.

The temperature of the fluid was 15º C.

Page 183: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

164

7.3.4.2 Flow Domain

The steady state fluid flow was considered so that fluid temperature can be

the only regulatory factor in determining the effect of cooling system of the EV

battery packs in a specific layout strategy. K-epsilon turbulent model was selected

for the analysis. The morphology of the fluid was continuous. The reference pressure

was given as 1 atm. The non-buoyant stationary domain motion was selected for the

fluid flow. Mesh deformation was specified by the regions declared in the geometry.

The initial velocity of the fluid was given as 1.5 m/s. The physics model generated

at the CFD analysis was as shown in Table 7-5.

Table 7-5: Background physics data of the analysis model

Type Fluid

Morphology Continuous Fluid

Buoyancy Model Non Buoyant

Domain Motion Stationary

Mesh Deformation Regions of Motion Specified

Mesh Motion Displacement Diffusion

Mesh Stiffness 1.0000e+00 [m^2 s^-1]

Reference Pressure 1.0000e+00 [atm]

Heat Transfer Isothermal

Fluid Temperature 1.5000e+01 [C]

Turbulence Model k epsilon

Turbulent Wall Functions Scalable

The inlet, outlet and wall of the fluid region were defined in the CFX-Pre

module. In the default domain inlet and outlet show the flow direction of the fluid as

given below:

Page 184: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

165

Figure 7-10: Inlet, outlet and wall in CFX-Pre module

The boundary conditions for the inlet and outlet regions were defined as

below:

Table 7-6: Inlet boundary conditions

Location INLET

Flow Direction Normal to Boundary Condition

Flow Regime Subsonic

Mass And Momentum Mass Flow Rate

Mass Flow Rate 3.9620e-02 [kg s^-1]

Turbulence Medium Intensity and Eddy Viscosity Ratio

INLET

OUTLET

Page 185: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

166

Table 7-7: Outlet boundary conditions

Location OUTLET

Flow Regime Subsonic

Mass And Momentum Average Static Pressure

Pressure Profile Blend 5.0000e-02

Relative Pressure 0.0000e+00 [Pa]

Pressure Averaging Average Over Whole Outlet

For the wall, the mass and momentum was based on no-slip and the wall

roughness was selected to be smooth.

7.3.4.3 CFX Solver Control

High resolution first order turbulence numeric was selected for the solver

control of the CFX-Pre. In the convergence control 1-50 iterations were considered.

7.3.4.4 Battery Temperature with Time steps

Heat generated in each battery pack as a function of time was the boundary

condition of the analysis. Figure 6-9 demonstrated the temperature of each battery

pack with time. Here, the worst case scenario was considered that the temperature of

the pack was raised at a very high rate. Within only 20 sec the battery pack reached

at its maximum temperature point.

7.3.5 Transient Thermal Analysis Module

Transient thermal analysis module determined temperatures and other

thermal quantities that varied over time. In this case, it was a linear transient thermal

analysis because the material properties such as thermal conductivity, specific heat or

density and the convection or radiation coefficients were considered to be

temperature independent. The geometry was shared in both CFX and transient

thermal module. The solution segment of the CFX module was imported into the

transient thermal set up. The fluid body temperature data was shared as the imported

load in the transient thermal analysis system. Battery temperature was given

Page 186: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

167

according to the time steps as given in the table above. The analysis system applied

in this case was as shown in Figure 7-11.

Figure 7-11: Detail flowchart of FSI analysis

To get the temperature of the battery pack temperature probes were applied at

some points of the battery packs. Temperature probes were used to determine the

exact temperature of the selected coordinate within the domain. Here, probes were

defined by picking the points within the domain. Most of the points were selected

close to the Terminal point, TAB of the battery as temperature raises the most near

the TAB. Probe 1 was placed close to the TAB and the coolant flow pipe. Probe 2

was placed close to the TAB, but not near the coolant pipe. Probe 3 was placed at the

mid area of the battery pack and close to the coolant pipe. Probe 4 was placed at the

mid area, but not near the coolant pipe. The temperature probes were placed covering

most of the crucial temperature peak and off-peak points at the battery pack.

Page 187: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

168

Figure 7-12: Temperature probes placed to get the temperature of different locations of the battery

The default initial condition of a transient thermal analysis was a uniform

temperature of 22ºC. In this case, the initial temperature of the domain was modified

according to the temperature generated at the battery pack. In the first iteration of the

analysis this temperature was used as the starting temperature of the domain. Here,

temperature probes were placed to specify the initial temperature of those

coordinates so that the output temperature probe could be placed at the same

coordinate to obtain the temperature tracks. From the steady state flow analysis, the

imported temperature load was imported into the transient thermal analysis.

7.4 Results 7.4.1 CFX Analysis

Fluid flow analysis demonstrated the behaviour of the fluid thorugh the pipe

according to the material properties of the fluid. Here, velocity and pressure of the

fluid were measured through the pipe.

Probe 2

Probe 1

Probe 3

Probe 4

Page 188: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

169

Figure 7-13: Velocity profile of the coolant fluid flow

Figure 7-14: Pressure profile of coolant fluid (inlet, outlet and wall)

Page 189: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

170

Another important factor analysed in this work was fluid temperature as an

output data. Figure 7-15 shows the change of temperature in coolant fluid. The pipe

wall is the main interface of this heat transfer. Both heat sources are sharing the pipe

wall to exert the heat. In CFX post processing section, the temperature of the coolant

pipe wall was measured.

Figure 7-15: Temperature profile of pipe acting as heating/cooling interface

7.4.2 Transient Thermal Analysis

In transient thermal analysis, the total analysis duration was 50 sec. The fluid

region of the model was supressed to avoid the complicacy during the analysis run

time. The temperature of the battery pack was measured in the solution step of the

analysis. The initial ambient temperature was set at 22º C during the analysis. Here,

the temperature generation with time was applied to the whole solid body. Figure

7-16 shows the temperature gradient of the solid body accordingly at 11.11 sec and

33.33 sec. At 33.33 sec the temperature was decreased to the minimum level under

the effect of the coolant fluid flow.

Page 190: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

171

Figure 7-16: Battery temperature magnitude ramp accordingly at 11.11 and 33.33 sec.

As heat was not generated and exerted uniformly on the whole body of the

battery pack, in this analysis temperature probes were placed to get the thermal

behaviour of the solid body at different coordinates. These coordinates were chosen

by considering the crucial area of heat generation. The location of placing the

temperature probes were based on the distance from the coolant pipe and the

maximum heat generation region, the TAB of the battery. The location of these

probes was shown in Figure 7-12. At each probe, the temperature was found with the

time steps in 50 sec duration of the analysis. The temperature data for each probe

with time steps were collected from the results and the graph was plotted as shown in

Figure 7-17.

45.245 37.875 30.505 23.134 15.764 8.394 1.0239 ‐6.3463 ‐13.717 ‐21.087 

Temperature Unit: ºC

11.11 Sec. 33.33 Sec.

Page 191: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

172

Figure 7-17: Temperature data chart at four temperature probes

7.5 Discussion 7.5.1 Fluid Flow Analysis

In fluid flow analysis, velocity of the fluid was measured as shown in Figure

7-13. The figure referred that at every turning point of the path the velocity increased

due to the sharp edges. According to the velocity profile plotted here, at the most part

of the path the velocity of the fluid was very close to the initial velocity (1.5 m/s). At

the outlet it was also maintaining the same velocity with some distortions due to the

rapid turns and frequent sharp edges. The maximum velocity developed at the turns

was 2.5 – 3.35 m/s.

Another observation from the velocity profile was the velocity streamline

field increased in magnitude far from the wall. At the points close to the wall the

velocity magnitudes were started to decrease. This was happened due to the no-slip

condition applied to the wall in the boundary condition of the analysis.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Tem

pera

ture

[ºC

]

Time Steps (Sec)

Probe 1

Probe 2

Probe 3

Probe 4

Page 192: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

173

In the turbulent flow pattern, the intensity of the turbulence was noticeable.

The average turbulence intensity was found 1.2 - 1.5%. For the laminar flow, the

expected turbulence intensity would be less than 1%. However the value was still

very small and the flow could be considered close to laminar. The turbulence seemed

to be highest while approaching the sharp edges. This might be explained by the

geometry constraints considered in the CAD model of the cooling system.

Pressure contour of the coolant fluid flow in Figure 7-14 displayed the

maximum pressure generated at the inlet and the minimum pressure generated at the

outlet. The inlet pressure magnitude was 31 pa and the outlet pressure was less than 5

pa. The minimum pressure was observed at the outlet due to the given average

relative pressure at exit point as the boundary condition of the analysis. As the flow

was considered to be laminar, the turbulence k-epsilon model did not have significant

impact on the pressure profile of the fluid flow.

Figure 7-15 demonstrated the temperature profile of coolant pipe. It displayed

the interface of the heat transfer. The inner surface of the coolant pipe was

considered here. The mechanical input from the transient thermal module was

imported to the CFX module to analyse this phenomenon. In the mechanical input,

the battery temperature profile was applied to the coolant fluid flow which exerted

the heat to the pipe. The heat transferred to the inner surface of the pipe was shown.

The temperature of the coolant pipe increased maximum to 313 K [40˚C] in some

locations. But the major portion of the fluid exhibited the temperature range of 289-

297 K [15-24˚C] The initial temperature of the fluid was given 15˚C. After

experiencing the heat transfer from the mechanical input file, the temperature of the

inner surface of the coolant pipe rised.

7.5.2 Transient Thermal Analysis

The temperature gradient of the solid battery pack was facing the temperature

between 15 to 23º C at 11.11 sec as shown in Figure 7-16. 15º C was mostly noticeable

at the channel of the coolant pipe due to the temperature of the fluid.

At 33.33 sec the battery pack reached to its lowest temperature under the

effect of the coolant flow. Figure 7-16 showed that at this point of time, the

temperature of the solid body varied from 15 to 28º C. The magnitude of the

Page 193: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

174

temperature experienced in the most of the heated surface was 25 to 28º C. From the

analysis results, it was observed that area close to the fluid flow region faced the

temperature between 15 to 24º C due to the fluid temperature.

Temperature probes were placed to get the thermal behaviour at certain

coordinates of the solid body. Probes were declared at the initial condition of the

analysis to put the battery temperature as input value. At the solution step of the

analysis, the effect of coolant fluid flow was observed at those temperature probes.

Probe 2 was placed very close to the terminal (TAB) of the battery as shown in Figure

7-12 and the maximum magnitude of temperature applied on that probe was 45º C. In

the chart shown in Figure 7-17 the lowest temperature observed at probe 2 was 28º

C. The rate of cooling at probe 2 was also very low as observed in the chart. The

location of probe 2 far from the coolant pipe may cause this low decrease rate of the

temperature. Probe 1 was also placed near the TAB of the battery and same

temperature 45º C was applied initially as probe 2. But the location of probe 1 was

close to the coolant pipe. For this reason, the magnitude of the lowest temperature at

probe 1 was below 25º C and also the decreasing rate of temperature was also higher

than probe 2. Probe 4 was placed close to the mid area of the battery and the initial

temperature was given 38º C. The magnitude of the temperature dropped to 23º C.

The location of probe 4 was far from the coolant fluid region. Probe 3 was placed at

the mid area of the battery and also close to the coolant pipe. The initial temperature

at this probe was 40º C. the temperature decreased under the effect of the coolant

fluid flow to 20º C. At this probe, the decreasing rate of the temperature was high.

7.6 Findings The main concept of this cooling system design was the idea of arranging the

coolant pipe around the battery pack. The analysis results showed the coolant fluid

flow worked properly to decrease the temperature of the pack. The temperature of

the battery pack was given as averagely 40-45º C and under the effect of the coolant

fluid flow, the temperature of the battery decreased averagely up to 25º C. The

surface temperature of the coolant pipe was also decreased at 25-28º C as shown in

Figure 7-15.

Page 194: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

175

If these design and analysis system can be tested in a real-time battery model

including the physical and chemical properties of the Li-ion battery and the heat

generation data due to charging and discharging, it can be helpful to increase the

robustness of the BMS.

Page 195: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

176

CHAPTER 8

CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE

RECOMMENDATIONS

8.1 Conclusions Automotive industry inclined towards emission free transportation and thus

the development of EV to serve the global environmental requirements. The purpose

of this research was to find out a suitable retrofitting system with respect to the

dynamic stability of the vehicle in different manoeuvring conditions such as sudden

change in steering and cornering, the structural safety of the battery packaging

arrangement and the efficiency of the cooling system of the battery pack. As referred

by the previous literature, the interest in enhancement of the commercialization and

adaptation of EV in the automobile market has grown along with the research for the

development of it and reduction of the limitations involved in it. This study was

mainly focused on the costs and rapid commercialization issues of EV. The

retrofitting of EV and the dynamic behaviour, structural and thermal analysis of the

battery packaging and cooling system to support the proposed architectural layout for

retrofitting were studied in this research.

8.1.1 Retrofitted Architectural Layout

EV propulsion system was chosen to obtain the best available space on the

vehicle after removing the engine, alternator, gear box, fuel tank etc. In wheel

propulsion was evaluated as the best choice in terms of power generation and space

allocation, though this propulsion system had a risk of increasing the un-sprung

weight of the vehicle. The un-sprung weight has a great impact on the rotational

inertia of the wheels. The braking of the wheel is subjected to be affected due to the

delay of the stopping time after pressing the brakes caused by the big amount of

Page 196: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

177

rotational inertia developed in the wheels. The contact patch area of the tyre will be

increased with the increment of the un-sprung weight which may affect the amount

of traction produced by the tyre at a given normal load. Un-sprung weight has an

impact on the vehicle handling as the increment of un-sprung weight may slower the

response of the vehicle to the steering input. In this circumstance, the un-sprung

weight became one of the selection constraints of the electric motor. The weight of

the electric motor was required to be lower to keep the un-sprung weight as low as

possible. The in-wheel technology delimited another selection measure that the size

of the motor was required to be compact to fit inside the wheel. Therefore, the power

to weight ratio regulated the selection of electric motor. The permanent magnet

motor was the optimum choice considering these criteria, though the costs involved

with PM motor was high due to the use of rare-earth material. According to the

efficiency and power to weight ratio provided by the electric motors, PM was the

better choice.

During the selection of vehicle parameter, the criteria were led by the in-

wheel propulsion requirement. The wheel size of the vehicle was one of the key

criteria for the mule vehicle selection. The power required to drive the vehicle was

important to check for matching with the capability of the motor as the motor power

is proportional to the weight and therefore the size of the motor. The space available

in the vehicle was considered so that the vehicle would be capable to accommodate

as many battery cells as possible. Toyota CAMRY was chosen as the mule vehicle

parameter for retrofitting. To fit the motor inside the wheel the existing wheel size of

the selected vehicle was not adequate. The regulations allowed 2” of increment to the

existing wheel diameter. In this situation, costs involved in retrofitting would rise for

two new drive wheels (front) to include the in-wheel propulsion.

In determining the weight components to be removed from the vehicle, the

requirement of battery packaging arrangement and cooling system design were

considered. The radiator and air-conditioning system of Toyota CAMRY were

decided to be kept to facilitate the cooling system of the battery pack. The weight

components to be added during retrofitting were determined as the most required and

significant weighted ones. The super-controller, battery monitoring system was not

considered in this study to simplify the analysis. Moreover, these items did not have

Page 197: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

178

significant weight which could have a great influence on the load distribution and

therefore the dynamic behaviour of the vehicle. However, the total weight of the

battery was considered as 330 kg for the CG calculation. The actual weight of the

battery was 325 kg according to the battery configuration given in Table 6-1. The extra

5 kg was considered as the weight of the cooling system for the battery.

The existing brakes and suspension were planned to be kept to avoid the cost

escalation, though the both systems were analysed based on the retrofitting concerns.

To check the reliability of the existing hydraulic braking system of Toyota CAMRY,

the disc brake was analysed under the impact of braking force generated for given

stopping time and distance. The braking force was calculated by considering the

retrofitted weight of the vehicle and the rise of temperature at the running disc was

given as input to obtain the thermal strain developed at the dynamic condition of the

brake. The rotational velocity of the disc under the effect of heat flux, radiation and

convection was also applied as input. The existing mechanical brake was found

capable of stopping the vehicle with the extra retrofitted weight. Sustainability of the

existing suspension system was checked by analysing the coil spring of Toyota

CAMRY under the effect of retrofitted weight. The geometry of the coil spring was

defined and modelled by measuring the dimension from the vehicle on site.

Theoretical displacement of the spring for the vehicle weight was calculated and

compared with the analysis result of total deformation. The suspension system was

found suitable for the retrofitted weight of the vehicle in terms of the performance

safety factor considering the spring constant. The spring constant applied in the

calculation was collected from the manual booklet of Toyota CAMRY Attara 2012

model provided by the vehicle manufacturer. For the reliability check of the

suspension system, more detail analysis could be performed which would be able to

take the sprung and un-sprung weight of the vehicle under consideration and

calculate the roll centre in the dynamic condition. The detail analysis of the

suspension system could determine the requirement of anti-roll bar during the

retrofitting of the vehicle.

Selection of suitable places in the vehicle to put the EV drive train

components was important. The potential places were analysed based on existing

facilities and advantages related to the locations. The front bay was the best place to

Page 198: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

179

package the battery for the weather protection included with it. The mid area had its

demerits as the retrofitting cost would rise to install an extra weather protecting

arrangement under the passenger seat. The rear boot area was subjected to the

compromise with the luggage space and spare wheel of the vehicle. However, three

architectural layouts were determined by considering these three places in the

vehicle. Load distribution and CG positions were calculated for the corresponding

layouts to simulate the dynamic characteristics of the retrofitted vehicle.

8.1.2 Vehicle Dynamic Analysis

The vehicle dynamic analysis was focused on the motion of the vehicle in

sudden change in manoeuvre and cornering situation. The forces acting on the

vehicle including rolling resistance, aerodynamic drag, tractive force generated from

the motor were calculated to determine the longitudinal force. The tractive force

generated by the electric motor was calculated from the motor torque data. The

aerodynamic drag force was calculated by considering an empirical formula for the

frontal area of vehicles with 800-2000 kg. The consideration of actual frontal area of

Toyota CAMRY could obtain the proper aerodynamic drag force in the driving

condition at a given velocity.

The polar moment and path radius calculated for three load distribution cases

referred to the mid area placement of the battery pack as the best solution for vehicle

stability, though the front loaded layout did not show significant difference. The

vehicle model was developed for both manoeuvring conditions under some

simplification assumptions. The chosen value of frictional coefficient was not for

standard road condition. Considering the standard road condition of frictional

coefficient 0.8-0.9 could obtain better dynamic results from the analysis. To check

the performance of the vehicle at an adverse road condition, the frictional coefficient

was chosen as 0.6. The steering angle considered was for the sudden change

manoeuvring condition was based on the FMVSS stability test data.

In the cornering dynamic analysis model, the spring and un-sprung roll was

simulated based on the spring data collected from the suspension details of Toyota

CAMRY. Hence, in the simulation tyre damping coefficient was not considered as

the actual value due to the un-availability of the tyre data. A standard tyre damping

Page 199: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

180

coefficient for the corresponding wheel size (18”) was given as input in the

simulation. Moreover, the tyre size was subjected to change to fit the motor inside

the wheel. According to the given coil spring data, the cornering dynamic analysis

results referred to the sustainability of the suspension system of the mule vehicle for

the retrofitted weight. The analysis results for the vehicle trajectory and tyre grip, the

mid-loaded architectural layout was found as the best suitable for retrofitting.

The longitudinal velocity of the vehicle at sudden steering change

demonstrated the front loaded layout as the best choice. Comparing all the dynamic

results and considering the design constraints of retrofitting, the new architectural

layout with dividing the battery pack into two units and placing those units in two

different locations was proposed in this research. To validate the proposed layout,

experimental set up was prepared.

During the experiment, a demo vehicle was tested according to the load

distribution of the proposed architectural layout. The experiment data was collected

from the demo vehicle in the lab and given as input in the vehicle model simulation

to compare the computational and experimental vehicle dynamic characteristics. As

the demo vehicle was not in a symmetric load distribution in the lateral direction, the

results were found a little unstable at dynamic condition specifically for the

cornering dynamic analysis and percentage of error could be counted for this

distortion of loading symmetry of the vehicle. While measuring the contact patch of

the demo vehicle to calculate the slip ratio at complete sliding condition, the static

loaded condition was taken under consideration. The contact patch area would be

found different if it was measured at dynamic loaded condition and therefore the

dynamic results could have been more realistic for the demo vehicle. The actual

frictional coefficient could be different from the given one. The given magnitude of

µ was for coarse concrete, whereas the lab floor was more polished. The

experimental result for the turning radius of the curved path showed the similar

vehicle handling characteristics as found in the computational result of vehicle

trajectory. In the vehicle trajectory computed for the demo vehicle, it was noticeable

that the actual path followed by the vehicle was not entirely circular whereas the

intended theoretical path was like a complete circle. This was happened because of

the unbalanced condition of the lateral load on each tyre. The tyre model was

Page 200: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

181

simulated for the demo vehicle from which the total slip was calculated and

compared with the slip at complete sliding of the tyre i.e. the maximum limit of slip.

The comparison found the total slip σ experienced by the tyres of the demo vehicle

was less than the maximum slip σm which referred to the dynamic stability of the

vehicle. In determining the slip ratio at front and rear tyres, only the acceleration of

the vehicle was considered. The braking of the vehicle could have demonstrated

significant changes in dynamic behaviour. However, during acceleration the

difference found between σ and σm was very large in magnitude. Considering this, σ

in braking condition was not calculated to avoid the complicacy in the tyre model.

The tyre grip developed for the demo vehicle also led to an acceptable level of

dynamic stability. According to the computational and experimental vehicle dynamic

analysis results, the proposed layout was found sustainable in both manoeuvring

conditions.

In the experimental set up, the demo vehicle was only turned left to obtain the

turning radius and the handling characteristics. As the demo vehicle was weighted

more at the left than the right side of the vehicle, the worse condition was subjected

to occur at the left turn due to the lateral load transfer from left (inside) to right tyres

(outside).

In case of sudden change in steering condition no experiment had been

accomplished due to the space facility inside the lab. Moreover, to check the sudden

change in steering the vehicle was required to be driven at least at 60 Km/h. But the

demo vehicle was not facilitated to increase the velocity up to 60 Km/h. The

experimental results for sudden change in manoeuvring condition could show a

better comparison in this study.

After validating the proposed layout, the load distribution was applied in case

of Toyota Camry. Then the simulation results were compared as demonstrated in

Table 5-7 with the front and mid loaded layout as these two layouts were found

dynamically more reliable than the rear load distribution. The comparison showed

the sustainability of the proposed layout in terms of trajectory followed by the

vehicle at a corner, the longitudinal and lateral velocity generated at each tyre.

Page 201: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

182

8.1.3 Structural Safety Analysis of the Battery Cooling System

To validate the proposed layout in terms of battery packaging arrangement

and cooling system design, the structural safety analysis was provided in this study.

A novel design arrangement was proposed and demonstrated for the packaging of the

battery included with the cooling system. Two design iterations were analysed

differing based on the dimensions of the cooling pipe according to the Australian

Standard for square hollow sections of structural steel. The impact load condition for

the analysis was determined by the vehicle crash analysis. Vehicle crash was

simulated only for the model of vehicle outer-shell and chassis to simplify the

analysis using LS-DYNA integrated with ANSYS mechanical APDL. The nodal

forces developed during the crash was collected from the output file and entered into

the structural analysis. In the crash simulation, only three nodes were defined to

collect the force data to shorten the analysis time. Defining more nodes could obtain

an accurate average magnitude of the force and thus a smooth force curve for the

structural analysis. The temperature of the battery pack was also considered to obtain

the combined effect of the crash impact load and thermal condition of the battery.

Total deformation, equivalent stress and durability of the structure were shown as the

analysis results. The results were compared in case of two design iterations as shown

in Table 6-6. In determining the cooling pipe dimension, the mass flow rate through

the pipe was the crucial consideration. The structural analysis was accomplished for

the battery pack to be installed at the front bay. The design of the packaging

arrangement and the cooling system in the mid area under the passenger seat were

not considered in this study.

8.1.4 Thermal Analysis of the Battery Cooling System

For the cooling of the battery, a combination of active and passive cooling

system was modelled in this research. The cooling circuit diagram including the

ducting arrangement in the front bay was provided connecting with the radiator and

air-conditioning system of the mule vehicle. The cooling circuit of the battery pack

in the front bay was proposed using the radiator for passive cooling and the AC heat

exchanger for the active cooling of the coolant fluid. The coolant temperature was

considered to be 15º C under the active involvement of AC heat exchanger. The

Page 202: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

183

proposed cooling diagram included a by-pass circuit (shown in Figure 7-1) for using

the AC system so that the energy loss could be avoided. When the required coolant

temperature can be maintained by the passive air-cooled system through the radiator,

the use of AC will cause the energy loss because the usage of AC will decrease the

energy stored in the battery pack.

The FSI analysis results were provided to demonstrate the cooling trend of

the battery temperature under the effect of the coolant flow temperature. The input of

battery temperature was given as varied with time. The thermal conductivity of the

coolant fluid was given 0.405 w/(m.k.) which was not very effective. The coolant

fluid with high thermal conductivity could have shown better results than the current

consideration. The fluid flow analysis imposed isothermal heat transfer and non-

buoyant k-epsilon turbulence model at 15º C. When the body flow temperature was

imported into thermal analysis of the battery, the pack temperature was decreased

and came down in the limit range. The maximum temperature of the battery pack

was given was 45º C which was based on the data collected from the battery

configuration.

8.2 Key Findings of the Research Based on the analytical and experimental results reported in this thesis the

following acquaintances can be claimed for the objective towards the performance

development of EVs:

The research focuses specifically on the retrofitting of the existing vehicle

with its aspects of propulsion system, motor drives, vehicle parameter etc. In-

wheel propulsion system (front wheel drive) with permanent magnet electric

motor, vehicle parameter of Toyota Camry Attara S 2012 model was selected

based on vehicle weight, space available and power required to drive the

vehicle as demonstrated in section 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3.

The research analyses the brake and suspension system of the selected vehicle

by considering the extra weight added for retrofitting and finds that the

existing brake and suspension systems are compatible with the retrofitted

Page 203: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

184

vehicle weight and load distribution. The FE analysis results are given in

section 3.4 and 3.5.

The research considers the sudden steering change and cornering manoeuvre

to develop the dynamic behaviour of the vehicle. The simulation was

described in section 4.3.2 and 4.3.3.

Three basic three architectural layouts (front, mid and rear loaded) are studied

in this research and combination of those reveals a better solution for

retrofitting. The research re-contextualizes the applicability of the existing

theory of vehicle dynamic analysis to the retrofitting situation of the vehicle

as shown in section 4.4.

The research claims a novel architectural layout (section 4.6.1) for retrofitting

and provides experimental validation to the theoretical proposal (section 5.2).

The proposed layout applied in the selected vehicle parameter Toyota Camry

was compared with the results for basic layouts based on dynamic behaviour.

The proposed layout was found more sustainable than the other layout as

compare in section 5.4.

The study conveys a total cooling circuit using the existing radiator and air-

conditioning system of the vehicle to obtain the required temperature (15º C)

of the supplied liquid coolant as shown in Figure 7-1.

The study provides a novel design for the battery packaging arrangement and

cooling system for the battery pack as shown in section 6.1 and 6.1.5.

The pipes of the battery cooling system are located around the pack close to

the terminal of the battery where the maximum temperature arises as

described in section 7.3.2.

Two design iterations based on the standard dimensions of the cooling pipes

are verified for the structural safety analysis of the packaging arrangement

including the battery cooling system as demonstrated in section 7.6.

The research confirms the workability of the cooling system by decreasing

the battery temperature significantly from 45º C to 28º C as shown in section

7.4.2.

Page 204: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

185

8.3 Future Recommendations Several aspects of the dynamic stability characteristics, structural safety and

thermal analysis involved in retrofitting purpose were studied in this research.

However, there are certain topics in which further investigation seems necessary and

are recommended in this section.

The proposed layout was not validated experimentally for Toyota Camry due

to the limited resources. The experimental validation using Toyota Camry would

establish this proposal and the design depending on the vehicle parameter and load

distribution stronger.

In this research, the assumptions considered in the dynamic analysis were to

simplify the vehicle model using MATLAB SIMULINK. The consideration of no

moving load may not precisely reflect the realistic dynamic results for the vehicle.

The road was considered as straight and flat with zero inclination which was not a

real-time scenario. Further study can be continued considering these assumptions to

create more effective and dynamic retrofitting solutions for EV development.

In the vehicle dynamic analysis, the tyre forces are calculated only during the

acceleration. The consideration of braking condition may establish more stable

feasibility of the system. The dynamic model can also be further developed by

considering different formula or method for the tyre model. The frictional coefficient

is considered as a constant value for the simulation in this research. The presence of

running surface irregularities may amplify the contact load on the tyres which can be

considered in further studies.

In this study, the battery pack was not modelled considering the configuration

and chemistry of the battery. Hence, the battery pack was considered as a solid

structure which exerted heat. The Li-ion phosphate battery pack could be modelled

by each cell and then connected in series to build the pack using appropriate software

as example Battery Design Studio (BDS). BDS can accommodate the power rating,

power to weight ratio, specific energy etc. data of the battery. In addition to the

temperature of the battery pack, temperature variation from module to module in a

pack could be analysed and obtained more accurate charge/discharge behaviour for

each module. The model of the battery pack could be analysed considering the

Page 205: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

186

thermal condition under the coolant flow. In that case, the temperature generation of

the battery would be according to the actual discharging condition. Instead of

obtaining the thermal analysis results at the defined temperature probes, the whole

battery pack would demonstrate the thermal condition and thus the efficiency of the

cooling system.

In addition, the battery pack could be placed in the vehicle with the

packaging arrangement and cooling system in the crash analysis. In this study, the

magnitude of nodal force was collected from the crash analysis. If the analysis could

be accomplished as the crash worthiness test of the vehicle including the battery

pack, the results would be more holistic and actual, though it would require more

analysis time and computational resources.

The goal of this study was to portrait a suitable architectural layout for the

retrofitted electric vehicle which could be dynamically stable during manoeuvring

without modifying any specification of the existing vehicle body to avoid the cost

escalation. To support the proposed layout the battery packaging and the cooling

system were taken under consideration in terms of weight, reliability and

compatibility with the selected vehicle parameter, though the vehicle operation under

a wide range of climate conditions and providing ventilation for the emission of

potential hazardous gases from the battery were not analysed. In this study, the

experimental validation for the battery thermal management and structural safety

were not provided. The analysis model can be validated with experimental data of

different vehicle platforms. Thus, the battery thermal management and safety

analysis can be explored further to obtain a holistic system for retrofitting of electric

vehicle.

Page 206: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

187

REFERENCES

AKIYAMA, K., IKEYA, N., MIYASHITA, K. & MISAKI, N. 1987. ACCELERATION RESPONSE

OF TURBOCHARGED PASSENGER CARS. IHI Engineering Review (English Edition), 20, 1-4.

AL-HALLAJ, S., SELMAN, J.R. 2002. Thermal modeling of secondary lithium batteries for electric vehicle/hybrid electric vehicle applications. Journal of Power Sources, 110 (2), pp. 341-348.

ALI BELHOCINE, A. M. B. 2013. Thermo-mechanical Analysis of a Disc Braking System. TRANSACTION ON CONTROL AND MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, 2, 302-309.

ALLMARAS., P. S. A. S. February 1992. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. Technical Report AIAA-92-0439. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

AMSDEN., F. H. H. A. A. A. 1971. A Numerical Fluid Dynamics Calculation Method for All Flow Speeds. Journal of Computational Physics, Vol 8.

BAKKER, E., NYBORG, L. & PACEJKA, H. B. 1987. Tyre modelling for use in vehicle dynamics studies. SAE Technical Papers.

BANDHAUER, T. M., GARIMELLA, S., FULLER, T.F. 2011. A critical review of thermal issues in lithium-ion batteries. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 158 (3), pp. R1-R25.

BASERRAH, S., RIXEN, K. & ORLIK, B. Transverse flux machines with distributed windings for in-wheel applications. Proceedings of the International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems, 2009. 102-108.

BATHE, K.-J. 1998. Crush simulation of cars with FEA. Mechanical Engineering, 120, 82-83. BAYKASOGLU, C., SUNBULOGLU, E., BOZDAG, S. E., ARUK, F., TOPRAK, T. & MUGAN, A.

2012. Crash and structural analyses of an aluminium railroad passenger car. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 17, 519-528.

BENNION, K. & KELLY, K. Rapid modeling of power electronics thermal management technologies. 5th IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, VPPC '09, 2009. 622-629.

BEVLY, D. M., RYU, J. & GERDES, J. C. 2006. Integrating INS sensors with GPS measurements for continuous estimation of vehicle sideslip, roll, and tire cornering stiffness. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 7, 483-493.

BLAZEK, J. 2005. Computational Fluid Dynamics: Principles and Applications BRUCE, P. G., SCROSATI, B. & TARASCON, J. M. 2008. Nanomaterials for rechargeable lithium

batteries. Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 47, 2930-2946. BURKE, A. F. 2007. Batteries and ultracapacitors for electric, hybrid, and fuel cell vehicles.

Proceedings of the IEEE, 95, 806-820. BUTLER, K. L., EHSANI, M. & KAMATH, P. 1999. A matlab-based modeling and simulation

package for electric and hybrid electric vehicle design. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 48, 1770-1778.

CAKIR, K. & SABANOVIC, A. In-wheel motor design for electric vehicles. International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, AMC, 2006. 613-618.

CAKIR, K. S., A. 2006. In-wheel motor design for electric vehicles. Advanced Motion Control, 2006. 9th IEEE International Workshop. Istanbul

CALIFORNIA, U. O. 2009. Electric Vehicle Conversion Design. CARICCHI, F., CRESCIMBINI, F., FEDELI, E. & NOIA, G. Design and construction of a wheel-

directly-coupled axial-flux PM motor prototype for EVs. Conference Record - IAS Annual Meeting (IEEE Industry Applications Society), 1994. 254-261.

CARICCHI, F., CRESCIMBINI, F., HONORATI, O., DI NAPOLI, A. & SANTINI, E. 1996. Compact wheel direct drive for EVs. IEEE Industry Applications Magazine, 2, 25-32.

CHALK, S. G. & MILLER, J. F. 2006. Key challenges and recent progress in batteries, fuel cells, and hydrogen storage for clean energy systems. Journal of Power Sources, 159, 73-80.

CHAN, C. C. 2002. The state of the art of electric and hybrid vehicles. Proceedings of the IEEE, 90, 247-275.

Page 207: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

188

CHAN, C. C. 2007. The state of the art of electric, hybrid, and fuel cell vehicles. Proceedings of the IEEE, 95, 704-718.

CHAN, C. K., CHENG, K. W. E. & HO, S. L. Development of packaging and electrical interfacing for electrical vehicles. 2006 2nd International Conference on Power Electronics Systems and Applications, ICPESA, 2006. 234-240.

CHEN, H. M. 2014. Driver model based on controller with open and close loop. Advanced Materials Research.

CHEN, L., HUANG, C., JIANG, H. & WANG, Z. 2012. Tire lateral-slip characteristics based on agent-neural net. Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 48, 153-158.

CHEN, S. C., WAN, C. C. & WANG, Y. Y. 2005. Thermal analysis of lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Power Sources, 140, 111-124.

CHEN, S. C., WAN, C.C., WANG, Y.Y. 2005. Thermal analysis of lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Power Sources, 140 (1), pp. 111-124.

CHEN, Y., EVANS, JAMES W. 1993. Heat transfer phenomena in lithium/polymer-electrolyte batteries for electric vehicle application. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 140 (7), pp. 1833-1838.

CHEN, Y., JI, Y. & GUO, K. 2014. A sliding mode observer for vehicle slip angle and tire force estimation. SAE Technical Papers, 1.

CHEN, Y., LU, Z. & ZHANG, D. 2009. Study on Steering Control Strategy of Electric Vehicles Driven by Hub-Motors. Advances in Neural Networks – ISNN 2009.

CHU, B. 2009. Lifepo4 batteries help consumer devices come to life. Power Electronics Technology, 35, 10-15.

CHUNG, M. J. Development of in-wheel motor system using blushless DC motor of hall sensor type. 2008 International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, ICCAS 2008, 2008. 1508-1511.

DECARLO, R. A., BRANICKY, M. S., PETTERSSON, S. & LENNARTSON, B. 2000. Perspectives and results on the stability and stabilizability of hybrid systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 88, 1069-1082.

DOUMIATI, M., CHARARA, A., VICTORINO, A., LECHNER, D. & DUBUISSON, B. 2012. Vehicle Dynamics Estimation using Kalman Filtering: Experimental Validation.

DOUMIATI, M., VICTORINO, A., CHARARA, A. & LECHNER, D. 2009. Lateral load transfer and normal forces estimation for vehicle safety: Experimental test. Vehicle System Dynamics, 47, 1511-1533.

DVORAK, A. & FITZHORN, P. 2008. State transition diagrams of transient roll and pitch. SAE Technical Papers.

EDWARD J. SIMBURGER, J. T. S. 2006. Residential Photovoltaics; An Investment Vehicle for Retiree’s. th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion. Waikoloa, Hawaii.

EHSANI, K. M. R. M. Performance Analysis of Electric Motor Drives for Electric and Hybrid Electric Vehicle Applications. IEEE Power Electronics in Transportation, 14-24 OCT, 1996 1996. 49 - 56.

EHSANI, S. W. M. K. M. R. M. 1999. Effect on Vehicle Performance of Extending the Constant Power Region of Electric Drive Motors. International Congress and Exposition, Society of Automotive Engineers. Detroit, Michigan: Advances in Electric Vehicle Technology (SP-1417).

ESFAHANIAN, V., RENANI, S. A., NEHZATI, H., MIRKHANI, N., ESFAHANIAN, M., YAGHOOBI, O. & SAFAEI, A. 2013. Design and simulation of air cooled battery thermal management system using thermoelectric for a hybrid electric bus.

FAN, L., KHODADADI, J. M. & PESARAN, A. A. 2013. A parametric study on thermal management of an air-cooled lithium-ion battery module for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Journal of Power Sources, 238, 301-312.

FRENDO, F., GRECO, G., GUIGGIANI, M., SPONZIELLO, A. 2007. The handling surface: A new perspective in vehicle dynamics. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 45 (11), pp. 1001-1016.

FUKADA, Y. 1999. Slip-Angle Estimation for Vehicle Stability Control. Vehicle System Dynamics: International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility, 32.

Page 208: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

189

GIESSELMANN, M. G. Dynamic modeling of switched reluctance machines with PSpice for Windows. Proceedings of the Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, 1996. 298-303.

GILLESPIE, T. D. February 1992. Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics. GIORGETTI., A. November 28 2000. Disc for a disc brake for vehicles in general and for

highperformance cars in particular,. GÖRANSSON, L., KARLSSON, S., JOHNSSON, F. 2010. Integration of plug-in hybrid electric

vehicles in a regional wind-thermal power system. Energy Policy, 38 (10), pp. 5482-5492. GOTO, H., SUZUKI, Y., NAKAMURA, K., WATANABE, T., GUO, H. J. & ICHINOKURA, O.

2005. A multipolar SR motor and its application in EV. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 290-291 PART 2, 1338-1342.

GU, W. B. & WANG, C. Y. 2000. Thermal-electrochemical modeling of battery systems. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 147, 2910-2922.

GUILLAUME BAFFET , A., DANIELLECHNER 2009. Estimation of vehicle side slip,tire force and wheel cornering stiffness. Control Engineering Practice, 17, 1255-1264.

GUSTAFSSON, F. 1997. Slip-based tire-road friction estimation. Automatica, 33, 1087-1098. GUSTAFSSON, F. 1998. Monitoring tire-road friction using the wheel slip. IEEE Control Systems

Magazine, 18, 42-49. H.VERSTEEG, W. M. 2007. An introduction to computational fluid dynamics, Pearson Prentice Hall. HASAN, M. H., M. EKTESABI 2012. Vehicle modelling for Electronic Stability Control in a four in-

wheel electric vehicle. IEEE International Electric Vehicle Conference. Greenville, South Carolina, USA.

HCDRICH, K., HENNIGE, V. D., PILGRAM, P., VEIT, C., REIM, J. & FUCHS, A. LI-ION battery technologies for next generation hybrid and electric powertrains - Developments of a chemical tier 2 suppliers. FISITA World Automotive Congress 2008, Congress Proceedings - Electronics, 2008. 389-397.

HE, H. W., SUN, F. C. & YU, X. J. 1999. A study on the methods of simulation of vehicle powertrain's performance. He Jishu/Nuclear Techniques, 22, 582-586.

HENNEN, M. D. & DE DONCKER, R. W. Comparison of outer- and inner-rotor switched reluctance machines. Proceedings of the International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems, 2007. 702-706.

HICKMAN, R., ASHIRU, O. & BANISTER, D. 2010. Transport and climate change: Simulating the options for carbon reduction in London. Transport Policy, 17, 110-125.

HUGHES., T. J. R. 1987. The Finite Element Method Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, Inc.

I.J.M. BESSELINK, P. F. V. O., E. MEINDERS, AND H. NIJMEIJER. Design of an efficient, low weight battery electric vehicle based on a VW Lupo 3L. The 25th World Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium & Exhibition, 2010 Shenzhen, China.

ISLAM, I. H. M. S. 1999. Design, Modelling and Simulation of an Electric Vehicle System. Advance in Electric Vehicle Technology, SP-1417, Society of Automitive Engineers Inc. USA.

JAIN, I. P. 2009. Hydrogen the fuel for 21st century. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34, 7368-7378.

JERHAMRE, A. A. C. B. 2001. . Numerical Study of Brake Disc Cooling Accounting for Both Aerodynamic Drag Force and Cooling Efficiency. SAE 2001 World Congress. Detroit, Michigan.

JUNG, H. G., HASSOUN, J., PARK, J. B., SUN, Y. K. & SCROSATI, B. 2012. An improved high-performance lithium-air battery. Nature Chemistry, 4, 579-585.

JUNMIN WANG, L., R.G. Combined Tire Slip and Slip Angle Tracking Control for Advanced Vehicle Dynamics Control Systems. Decision and Control, 2006 45th IEEE Conference on, 13-15 Dec. 2006 2006 San Diego, CA. IEEE, 1733 - 1738.

KANDLIKAR, S. G. & HAYNER, C. N. 2009. Liquid cooled cold plates for industrial high-power electronic devices thermal design and manufacturing considerations. Heat Transfer Engineering, 30, 918-930.

KANG, B. & CEDER, G. 2009. Battery materials for ultrafast charging and discharging. Nature, 458, 190-193.

KAZIMI, S. M. A. 2001. Solid Mechanics, Tata McGraw-Hill Education.

Page 209: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

190

KENNEDY, B., PATTERSON, D. & CAMILLERI, S. 2000. Use of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles. Journal of Power Sources, 90, 156-162.

KEVALA, R. J. Development of a liquid-cooled phosphoric acid fuel cell/battery power plant for transit bus applications. Proceedings of the Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, 1990. 297-300.

KING, J. T. G., H, CHEN 1997. Computer-Aided Design and Analysis of Direct-Driven Wheel Motor Drive. IEEE on Power Electronics.

KIRKPATRICK, S. W., SIMONS, J. W. & ANTOUN, T. H. 1999. Development and validation of high fidelity vehicle crash simulation models. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 4, 395-405.

KIZILEL, R., SABBAH, R., SELMAN, J.R., AL-HALLAJ, S. 2009. An alternative cooling system to enhance the safety of Li-ion battery packs. Journal of Power Sources, 194 (2), pp. 1105-1112.

KOETNIYOM, S. 2000. Thermal Stress Analysis of Automotive Disc Brakes. PhD, University of Leeds.

KREIN, P. T., ROETHEMEYER, T. G., WHITE, R. A. & MASTERSON, B. R. Packaging and performance of an IGBT-based hybrid electric vehicle. IEEE Workshop on Power Electronics in Transportation, 1994. 47-52.

KUBOTA, M. 2000. Development of a lightweight brake disc rotor: a design approach for achieving anoptimum thermal, vibration and weight balance. JSAE Review, p. 349-355.

LASCHOBER, C., LIMBECK, A., RENDL, J. & PUXBAUM, H. 2004. Particulate emissions from on-road vehicles in the Kaisermühlen- tunnel (Vienna, Austria). Atmospheric Environment, 38, 2187-2195.

LEE, B. K. E., M. 2001. Adv BLDC motor drive for low cost and highperformance propulsion system in electric and hybrid vehicles. Electric Machines and Drives Conference, 2001. IEMDC 2001. IEEE International Cambridge, MA

LEE, C., HEDRICK, K. & YI, K. 2004. Real-time slip-based estimation of maximum tire-road friction coefficient. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 9, 454-458.

LEE, S. G., JEON, D.H. 2014. Effect of electrode compression on the wettability of lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Power Sources, 265, pp. 363-369.

LEWANDOWSKI, A., KURC, B., SWIDERSKA-MOCEK, A., KUSA, N. 2014. LiFePO4 lithium-ion battery working at the heat engine coolant temperature | [Graphite]. Journal of Power Sources, 266, pp. 132-137.

LI, K., MISENER, J. A. & HEDRICK, K. 2007. On-board road condition monitoring system using slip-based tyre-road friction estimation and wheel speed signal analysis. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-body Dynamics, 221, 129-146.

LIDNER, L. 1992. EXPERIENCE WITH THE MAGIC FORMULA TYRE MODEL. Vehicle System Dynamics: International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility, 21, 30-46.

LIXIN, S. 2009. Electric vehicle development: The past, present & future. 3rd International Conference on Power Electronics Systems and Applications, PESA.

LOING, P. Nissan puts zero-emission leadership at the center of its product strategy. 24th International Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition 2009, EVS 24, 2009. 2938-2940.

M. EHSANI; K., M., RAHMAN; H., A., TOLIYAT 1997. Propulsion System Design of Electric and Hybrid Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

M., K. A. M. H. K. A. E. Evaluation of Vehicle Architectures for In-Wheel Electric Vehicle Drive Train Design. AutoCRC Conference, 2011 Melbourne.

M. S. FALLAH, M. M. M. E. 2008. KINEMATICAL AND DYNAMICAL ANALYSIS OF MACPHERSON SUSPENSION USING DISPLACEMENT MATRIX METHOD. Iranian Journal of Science & Technology, Transaction B, Engineering, Vol. 32, No. B4, , pp 325-339.

MAHAMUD, R., PARK, C. 2011. Reciprocating air flow for Li-ion battery thermal management to improve temperature uniformity. Journal of Power Sources, 196 (13), pp. 5685-5696.

MANUAL 2012. Tyre and Rim Standards Australia. MARQUÉS-BRUNA, P. 2011. Engineering the race car wing: Application of the vortex panel

numerical method. Sports Engineering, 13, 195-204.

Page 210: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

191

MATTHE, R., TURNER, L. & METTLACH, H. 2011. VOLTEC Battery System for Electric Vehicle with Extended Range. SAE International Journal of Engines, 4, 1944-1962.

MAZUMDER, H. E., M. ; KAPOOR, A 4-8 March, 2012. Effect of mass distribution on cornering dynamics of retrofitted EV. IEEE International Electric Vehicle Conference. Greenville, South Carolina, USA.

MAZUMDER, H. M. M. A. E. H. E., M; KAPOOR, A 2011. Performance analysis of EV for different mass distributions to ensure safe handling. ELSEVIER Sciencedirect: presented in ICAEE 2011 Conference.

MICHALEK, J. J., PAPALAMBROS, P. Y. & SKERLOS, S. J. 2004. A study of fuel efficiency and emission policy impact on optimal vehicle design decisions. Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME, 126, 1062-1070.

MILLEVILLE-PENNEL, I. 2008. A visual sign of lateral acceleration for steering assistance. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 66, 145-157.

MILLS, A., AL-HALLAJ, S. 2005. Simulation of passive thermal management system for lithium-ion battery packs. Journal of Power Sources, 141 (2), pp. 307-315.

MILLS, A., FARID, M., SELMAN, J.R., AL-HALLAJ, S. 2006. Thermal conductivity enhancement of phase change materials using a graphite matrix. Applied Thermal Engineering, 26 (14-15), pp. 1652-1661.

MORAWSKA, L., JAMRISKA, M., THOMAS, S., FERREIRA, L., MENGERSEN, K., WRAITH, D. & MCGREGOR, F. 2005. Quantification of particle number emission factors for motor vehicles from on-road measurements. Environmental Science and Technology, 39, 9130-9139.

MÜLLER-GLASER, M. G. A. F. J. P. O. S. F. G. K. D. Converted vehicle for battery electric drive: Asoects on the software driven vehicle control unit.

MÜLLER, G. Transient analysis of tyre-road forces and their effects of vehicle handling. 2002. 337-344.

MÜLLER, S., UCHANSKI, M. & HEDRICK, K. 2003. Estimation of the Maximum Tire-Road Friction Coefficient. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, Transactions of the ASME, 125, 607-617.

MUNSON, B. R., YOUNG, D.F., OKIISHI, T.H. 1994. Fundamentals of fluid mechanics NAKANO-CHO, H.-S. 2008. EFFECT OF THE FRONT AND REAR WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION

RATIO OF A FORMULA CAR DURING MAXIMUM-SPEED CORNERING ON A CIRCUIT. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 9, 8.

NEUBAUER, J., WOOD, E. 2014. Thru-life impacts of driver aggression, climate, cabin thermal management, and battery thermal management on battery electric vehicle utility. Journal of Power Sources, 259, pp. 262-275.

NG, J. C. & DUBLJEVIC, S. Thermal management of lithium-ion batteries and control strategies. 2012.

P. CHEN, E. H. 1998, (6). Use of Computational Fluid Dynamics in Hydrodynamic Lubrication. Journal of Engineering Tribology,, 427–435.

PACEJKA, H. B. Tyre And Vehicle Dynamics, Netherland. PALS, C. R. & NEWMAN, J. 1995. Thermal modeling of the lithium/polymer battery. I. Discharge

behavior of a single cell. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 142, 3274-3281. PARK, H. 2013. A design of air flow configuration for cooling lithium ion battery in hybrid electric

vehicles. Journal of Power Sources, 239, 30-36. PASTERKAMP, W. R. & PACEJKA, H. B. 1997. The tyre as a sensor to estimate friction. Vehicle

System Dynamics, 27, 409-422. PATEL N (CYPRESS CA), HITI S (REDONDO BEACH CA) & RAHMAN K (TROY MI).

September 22, 2009 Gearless wheel motor drive system USA patent application 20090295316.

PENG, H. & TOMIZUKA, M. Vehicle lateral control for highway automation. Proceedings of the American Control Conference, 1990. 788-794.

PESARAN, G.-H. K. J. G. J. L. A. Dec 2-5, 2007. Thermal Management of Batteries in Advanced Vehicles Using Phase-Change Materials. Sustainibility - the future of transportation. Anaheim, California USA.

PETERS, K. 2000. Design options for automotive batteries in advanced car electrical systems. Journal of Power Sources, 88, 83-91.

Page 211: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

192

R., K. 2001. Switched Reluctance Motor Drives. In: PRESS, C. (ed.). RAHIM, N. A., PING, H. W. & TADJUDDIN, M. Design of axial flux permanent magnet brushless

DC motor for direct drive of electric vehicle. 2007 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, PES, 2007.

RAHMAN, K. M., FAHIMI, B., SURESH, G., RAJARATHNAM, A. V. & EHSANI, M. 2000. Advantages of switched reluctance motor applications to EV and HEV: Design and control issues. Ieee Transactions on Industry Applications, 36, 111-121.

RAHMAN, K. M., PATEL, N. R., WARD, T. G., NAGASHIMA, J. M., CARICCHI, F. & CRESCIMBINI, F. 2006. Application of direct-drive wheel motor for fuel cell electric and hybrid electric vehicle propulsion system. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 42, 1185-1192.

RAJAMANI, R. 2006. Vehicle Dynamics and Control, USA, Springer Science+Business Media, Inc., 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA.

RAJAMANI, R., PIYABONGKARN, D. N., LEW, J. Y., YI, K. & PHANOMCHOENG, G. 2010. Tire-road friction-coefficient estimation. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 30, 54-69.

RAMIREZ RUIZ, I. & CHELI, F. 2014. Vehicle dynamics, stability and control. SAE Technical Papers, 1.

RELEASE, P. P. Prof. Ferdinand Porsche Created the First Functional Hybrid Car. USA: Porsche Cars North America, Inc.

SABBAH, R., KIZILEL, R., SELMAN, J.R., AL-HALLAJ, S. 2008. Active (air-cooled) vs. passive (phase change material) thermal management of high power lithium-ion packs: Limitation of temperature rise and uniformity of temperature distribution. Journal of Power Sources, 182 (2), pp. 630-638.

SCHIFFER, J., LINZEN, D., SAUER, D.U. 2006. Heat generation in double layer capacitors. Journal of Power Sources, 160 (1), pp. 765-772.

SCROSATI, B. & GARCHE, J. 2010. Lithium batteries: Status, prospects and future. Journal of Power Sources, 195, 2419-2430.

SESHU, P. 2003. FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS, PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd. SHARP, R. S. & DODU, M. 2004. Kinematic cross-linking in automotive suspension systems.

Vehicle System Dynamics, 41, 63-72. SHIM, T. & MARGOLIS, D. 2004. Model-based road friction estimation. Vehicle System Dynamics,

41, 249-276. SIENEL, W. Estimation of the tire cornering stiffness and its application to active car steering.

Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 1997. 4744-4749. SPALDING., B. E. L. A. D. B. 1974. The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows". Computer

Methods In Applied Mechanics and Engineering. Vol. 3, pp 269-289. SRINIVASAN, V. & WANG, C. Y. 2003. Analysis of electrochemical and thermal behavior of Li-ion

cells. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 150, A98-A106. STANDARD, A. Australian Standard Structural Cold Form Square Hollow Section Australia:

Bluescope Corporation STOCKAR, S., TULPULE, P., MARANO, V. & RIZZONI, G. 2010. Energy, economical and

environmental analysis of plug-in hybrids electric vehicles based on common driving cycles. SAE International Journal of Engines, 2, 467-476.

SYLVAIN DETALLE, J. F. F. G. 1997. A tyre model for interactive driving simulators. Vehicle System Dynamics: International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility, 27, 326-329.

TAKESHI IIJIMA, P. R., YOHEI MICHITSUJI, MASAO NAGAI April 2010. Vehicle Side Slip Angle Estimation Methodology Using a Drive Recorder. Journal of Vibration and control, 16, 13.

TAKEZONO, H. M. S. 2000. Two-Dimensional Motion of Vehicles Damaged due to Collision. Vehicle System Dynamics: International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility, 34, 229-248.

TERASHIMA, M., ASHIKAGA, T., MIZUNO, T., NATORI, K., FUJIWARA, N. & YADA, M. 1997. Novel motors and controllers for high-performance electric vehicle with four in-wheel motors. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 44, 28-38.

TONG, W. & HOU, Z. 2014. Analyses on the vertical characteristics and motor vibration of an electric vehicle with motor-in-wheel drive. Qiche Gongcheng/Automotive Engineering, 36, 398-403+425.

Page 212: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

193

TRAN, T.-H., HARMAND, S., SAHUT, B. 2014. Experimental investigation on heat pipe cooling for Hybrid Electric Vehicle and Electric Vehicle lithium-ion battery. Journal of Power Sources, 265, pp. 262-272.

TREMBLAY, O. & DESSAINT, L. A. 2009. Experimental validation of a battery dynamic model for EV applications. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 3.

TSENG, K. J. & CHEN, G. H. 1997. Computer-aided design and analysis of direct-driven wheel motor drive. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 12, 517-527.

VAN MIERLO, J. & MAGGETTO, G. 2007. Fuel cell or battery: Electric cars are the future. Fuel Cells, 7, 165-173.

VIJAYENTHIRAN, V. May 10, 2008. Michelin’s Active Wheel technology in detail. http://www.motorauthority.com.

WANG, J., ALEXANDER, L. & RAJAMANI, R. 2004. Friction estimation on highway vehicles using longitudinal measurements. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, Transactions of the ASME, 126, 265-275.

WARCZEK, J., BURDZIK, R. & PERUŃ, G. 2014. The method for identification of damping coefficient of the trucks suspension. Key Engineering Materials.

WEI, G., YANG, Z. & LI, Q. 2014. A parametric modeling method of low-drag car body and aerodynamic test. Tongji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tongji University, 42, 769-772+781.

WEICHERT., P. D. E. A. D. 2003. A thermomechanical model for the analysis of disc brake fracture mechanisms. Journal of Thermal Stresses.

WHITE, F. M. 1991. Viscous Fluid Flow., New York., McGraw-Hill. . WILL, F. G. 1996. Impact of lithium abundance and cost on electric vehicle battery applications.

Journal of Power Sources, 63, 23-26. WRIGGERS, P. 2006. Computational contact mechanics. XU, J., CHEN, S. & LAI, J. 2014. Aerodynamic analysis on passenger vehicle and the improving

design of passenger vehicle. Energy Education Science and Technology Part A: Energy Science and Research, 32, 1075-1084.

XUE, X. D. C., K. ; CHEUNG, N.C. 2008. Selection of ELECTRIC MOTOR DRIVES for electric vehicles. Power Engineering Conference, 2008. AUPEC '08. Australasian Universities Sydney, NSW.

Y. I. RYU1, D. O. K., S. J. HEO2,, H. J. YIM2 AND J. I. JEON3 2010. Development of analytical process to reduce side load in strut-type suspension. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 24 (2010) 351~356.

YANG, S. & KNICKLE, H. 2002. Design and analysis of aluminum/air battery system for electric vehicles. Journal of Power Sources, 112, 162-173.

YEOW, K., TENG, H., THELLIEZ, M. & TAN, E. 2012. Thermal analysis of a li-ion battery system with indirect liquid cooling using finite element analysis approach. SAE International Journal of Alternative Powertrains, 1, 65-78.

YOU, S. H., HAHN, J. O. & LEE, H. 2009. New adaptive approaches to real-time estimation of vehicle sideslip angle. Control Engineering Practice, 17, 1367-1379.

ZERAOULIA, M., BENBOUZID, M. E. H. & DIALLO, D. 2006. Electric motor drive selection issues for HEV propulsion systems: A comparative study. Ieee Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 55, 1756-1764.

ZETTERSTRAM, S. Electromechanical steering, suspension, drive and brake modules. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, 2002. 1856-1863.

ZHANG, G., WEI, L. & WU, N. The simulates value analysis for the vehicle frontage crash with the obstacles. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Transportation Engineering, ICTE 2009, 2009. 1451-1456.

ZHANG, X., LI, L., PAN, D., CAO, C. & SONG, J. 2014. Experimental model and analytic solution for real-time observation of vehicle's additional steer angle. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering (English Edition), 27, 340-347.

ZOLOT, M. D., KELLY, K., PESARAN, A., KEYSER, M., MIHALIC, M. & HIERONYMUS, A. Thermal evaluation of the honda insight battery pack. Proceedings of the Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, 2001. 923-928.

Page 213: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

194

APPENDIX A.1. MATLAB Programing for the Calculation of Longitudinal CG

function x =

calcCG(item1,item2,item3,item4,iniweight,m1,m2,m3,x1,x2,x3,distF,wheelbase)

itemTot=(item1+item2+item3+item4);

m4=iniweight-itemTot;

F=iniweight*distF; %weight on front axle F%,distF is the % of weight distribution

front to rear%

R=iniweight-F; %weight on rear axle R%

F1=F-itemTot; %weight on front axle after removing items%

R1=R; %for this instance no change in rear weight%

x4 = (wheelbase*R1)/(F1+R1);

calweight =F1+R1+m1+m2+m3;

x = ((m1*x1)+(m2*x2)+(m3*x3)+(m4*x4))/calweight; %x1 is forward side of front

axle%.

Page 214: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

195

A.2. MATLAB Programing for the Calculation of Vertical CG

function z =

calcCGz(item1,item2,item3,item4,iniweight,m1,m2,m3,z1,z2,z3,gc,vheight)

itemTot=(item1+item2+item3+item4);

m4=iniweight-itemTot;

z1a=z1+ gc; %Adding of ground clearance to calculate the CG from ground%

z2a=z2;

z3a=z3+ gc;

z4a= vheight*0.30; %Assuming after removal of items CG of the rest of the vehicle

is located at the 30 % of vehicle height%

M= m1+m2+m3+m4;

z= ((m1*z1a+m2*z2a+m3*z3a+m4*z4a)/M) + gc;

Page 215: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

196

A.3. Vehicle Dynamic Analysis using Simulink

Considering a vehicle moving on a flat road at a given velocity, the external

longitudinal forces, gravitational forces, aero-dynamic drag forces, rolling resistance

are calculated. Here, frontal area of the vehicle is considered for the passenger

vehicle with 800-2000 kg. In the simulation, there is no input for the throttle angle.

Page 216: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

197

A.4. Steering Angle Input and Calculation of Torque

The steering angle input is collected for a FMVSS test simulation result based

on a similar vehicle parameter. The steering angle signal is imported to the Simulink

vehicle model and converted according to the requirement of the model. As the

simulation considers 4 wheels separately, the torque calculated for the vehicle is

distributed by applying DEMUX to get the magnitude of torque experienced by each

wheel.

Page 217: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

198

A.5. Calculation of longitudinal and lateral forces acting on the front and rear tyres

The longitudinal and lateral forces are calculated from each tyre. The lateral

forces from each tyre are combined to observe the total lateral movement of the

vehicle. The velocity of the vehicle in the longitudinal and lateral direction and yaw

rate of the vehicle are calculated for the sudden change in angle of intention.

Page 218: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

199

A.6. Vehicle Body Dynamics

The model below demonstrates the calculation of vehicle body dynamics

considering the longitudinal and lateral forces on each tyre, the position of CG in the

longitudinal, lateral and vertical direction, rolling resistance, steering input as the

angle of intention and aerodynamic forces. The mgsinθ noted in the figure below is

the function of road inclination. The magnitude of θ is considered as zero according

to the assumptions made for the vehicle model creation.

Page 219: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

200

A.7. Wheel Dynamics and Calculation of normal forces acting on the front and rear tyres

The normal forces acting on the tyres are calculated in the model below.

Torque and wheel inertia is given as input here. This calculation is done for each tyre

subjected to the front wheel drive consideration for the vehicle model. The effective

radius of the tyre, reff is calculated as a function of angular velocity, ww of the wheel

and the longitudinal velocity of the vehicle. Longitudinal velocity Vx is considered in

the direction of longitudinal vehicle motion and (reffww - Vx) is in the opposite

direction. The longitudinal tyre stiffness Cσ for the front and rear tyre are calculated

from the longitudinal tyre force as a function of slip ratio.

Page 220: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

201

A.8. Vx, Vy and Yaw rate calculation

Vx, Vy and Yaw rate is calculated by using the vehicle body equations as

shown in equation 4.9, 4.10 and 4.11 accordingly. Vx, Vy and Yaw rate constitute

three degrees of freedom related to the vehicle.

Page 221: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

202

A.9. Tyre grip and lateral load transfer calculation

To calculate the tyre grip and the lateral load transfer of the vehicle while

cornering, the magnitude of traction generated by the tyre as function of vertical load

acting on it. The data is then linear interpolated to obtain the magnitude for a

calculated lateral load at a given condition. The lateral acceleration is given as input

over time which creates the graph of tyre grip over lateral load transfer for the acting

lateral acceleration at that time.

Page 222: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

203

A.10. Cornering Dynamics calculation

For the cornering dynamics of the vehicle a sensor is applied to the vehicle

model body. It senses three data to demonstrate the dynamic characteristics. The

(x,y) coordinate of the vehicle on the track, the velocity of the vehicle in longitudinal

and lateral direction and the yaw rate of the vehicle. As the model is to plot the

trajectory of the vehicle and the front-rear tyre slip ratio, the yaw rate data is

terminated as shown in figure below. In the Fx generator, the data is followed by the

trend of motor power data.

Page 223: Layout for retrofitting an electric vehicle · electric motor and mule vehicle parameter to obtain a proper retrofitting system for the vehicle. Moreover, retrofitting of EVs comprises

204

A.11. Wheel Dynamics and lateral force calculation

The sprung and un-sprung roll is calculated to get the position of the vehicle

in the track considering the cornering dynamics. Data sensed from the wheel is

converted into force. The steering angle data is given only for the front wheels and it

is imported to the axle. The sprung, un-sprung and wheel sensed data is combined in

a math function to calculate the lateral force on the tyre while cornering.