landslide classification

Upload: arief-nugraha-pontoh

Post on 04-Jun-2018

233 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    1/54

    Varnes LandslideClassification

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    2/54

    What is the purpose ofa classification?

    To file material so it can be easily retrieved*

    To organize thought To communicate*J.N. Hutchin so n, c. 2000

    Our main need is for labels describing landslidetypes (typology)but the system must be flexible and adaptable tothe complexity of landslides

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    3/54

    Typological classificationDivide phenomena into repeatingpatterns (types) characterized by

    several descriptors.

    Requirements:

    1) Comprehensive definition2) Type examples3) References

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    4/54

    Desirable qualities of atypological classification system:

    1. Simple, not too many classes2. Respectful of previous usage

    3. Flexible, with varying quality of data

    4. Each class name to be supported by a

    definition, examples and references

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    5/54

    What to do with complex types?Suggestion: leave the decision to the user.

    Rock avalancheRock slide

    Dr. Rick Guthrie

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    6/54

    Framework:

    Pre-failure movementsPost-failure movements

    Failureis the single most significantmovement episode.

    Failureinvolves the first formation ofa rupture surface

    It is up to the user to decide which.

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    7/54

    PrincipalmovementtypesCruden andVarnes, 1996

    (dates back toBalzer, 1875)

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    8/54

    D.J. Varnes, 1978

    33 types

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    9/54

    Landslide classification (Varnes, 1978 ) Co de: RAP ID , SLOW ( IN MOST CASES)

    B E D R O C K DEBRIS (80% sand and finer)

    FALLS ROCK F A L L D E B R I S F A L L E A R T H F A L L

    TOPPLES B LOCK TOP P L E

    FLEXURAL TOPPLE

    - B LOCK TOP P L E

    SLIDES ROCK SLUMP

    ROCK SL I DE

    DEB R I S SL I DE E A R T H S L U MP

    EARTH SLIDE

    SPREADS ROCK SPREAD - EARTH SPREAD

    F L O WS R O C K C R E E P

    SLOPE SAGGING

    DEBR I S F L OW

    DEBR I S

    A V A L A N C H E

    SOIL CREEP

    SOLIFLUCTION

    WET SAND AN D SI L T

    F L OW

    RA PI D E A R T H F L OW

    LOE SS F L OW

    D R Y S A N D F L O W

    E A R T H F L O W

    C O MP L E X ROCK A V A L A NCH E

    EARTH SLUMP-EARTHFLOW

    Ref.: Varn es, D.J., 1978. Slope movem ent types and processes. In Landslides, Analysis and Control. Special

    Report 176, Transportation Research Board, Washington, pp. 11-33.

    Varnes Classification Type Names

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    10/54

    Landslide velocity scale (Cruden and V arnes, 1996).

    Velocity

    class

    Description Velocity

    (mm/sec)

    Typical

    velocity

    Human

    response

    7 Extremely Rapid N il

    ------------------------ 5x103 5 m/sec

    6 Very Rapid N il

    ------------------------ 5x101 3 m/min

    5 Rap id Evacuat ion

    ------------------------ 5x10 -1 1.8 m/hr

    4 M oderate Evacuation

    ------------------------ 5x10-3

    13 m/mo nth

    3 Slow M aintenance

    ------------------------ 5x10-5

    1.6 m/year

    2 Very Slow M aintenance

    ------------------------ 5x10-7

    16 mm /year

    1 Extremely Slow N il

    Ref.: Cruden, D.M. and Varnes, D.J., 1996. Landslide types and processes. In Landslides, Investigation and

    Mitigation. Special Report 247, Transportat ion Research Board, Washington, pp. 36 -75.

    Velocity scale

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    11/54

    - Rock- Debris(more than 20% coarse*)

    - Earth(less than 20% coarse*)* Gravel clasts and larger

    1. Difficult to evaluate2. Little relevance to slide behaviour3. Incompatible with established systems

    Material categories:

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    12/54

    Suggested material classes

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    13/54

    Suggested material classes

    Geotechnicalclasses- plastic

    - granular

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    14/54

    Suggested material classes

    Mixed materials- plastic- granular(Mixed grain sizes,

    diluted by water)

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    15/54

    Clay, silt, sand, gravel, boulders

    How to simplify?Suggestion: use dominant componentwith emphasis on mechanicalbehaviour.

    Example:plastic clayey silt > claylow plasticity clayey silt > silt

    Geotechnical materials:

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    16/54

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    17/54

    Supplementary terms, geomorphological

    Do not use as primary names, because

    there is insufficient correlation withlandslide behaviour.Example, Alluvial (could be gravel, silt, clay)

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    18/54

    Some additional movement types:- Rotational/ translational/ compound slide(Hut ch inson , 1988)

    - Block topple/ flexural topple(Goodman and Bray, 1976)

    - Flow slide (Terzagh i, Casag rande, Meyerhof ..)

    - Slope deformation creep?

    - Rock collapse? (croulement, felssturz)

    - Debris flood (e.g. Au litzsk i, 1970)

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    19/54

    * Can be extremely rapid

    Summary

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    20/54

    Rock, ice fall

    Detachment, fal l , ro l l ing and bouncing o f roc k o r ice

    fragments. May o ccur s ingly or in clus ters, but there is l i t t le

    dynam ic interact ion between the most mobi le moving

    fragments, which interact mainly with th e substrate (path).

    Fragment deformation is un important, although fragments

    can break dur ing impacts. Usual ly o f l imi ted volum e.

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    21/54

    Rock block

    toppleChaco Canyon,

    New Mexico

    Forward rotat ion and over turn ing of roc k co lumns or

    plates (one or many), separated by steeply-dipping

    jo in ts . The rock is relat ively mass ive and ro tat ion oc-cu rs on wel l -def ined basal discon t inui t ies. Movement

    may begin s low ly, bu t the last s tage of fai lure is

    extremely rapid . Occurs at al l scales.

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    22/54

    Multiple block topple

    Czech Republic

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    23/54

    Rock Flexural Topple

    1980

    1987

    Bending and forw ard rotat ion of

    a rock mass character ized by

    very c losely-spaced, steeply

    d ipp ing jo in ts or schis tose

    part ings. The rock is relat ively

    weak and fiss i le. There are nowel l-def ined basal dis continui t ies

    that could al low for ro tat ion of

    blocks around their bases. The

    movement is general ly slow andtends to self-stabi l ize. However,

    secondary rotat ional sl id ing may

    develop in the hing e zone of the

    topple. Occurs at large scale.

    La Clapire, France

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    24/54

    Rock rotational slide (rock slump)Sl id ing o f a mass of w eak rock on a cyl ind r ical or el lipso idal

    rup ture surface which is no t stru ctural ly-contro l led. Li t t le

    internal deformation. A large main scarp and back -t i l ted

    bench at the head. Usual ly s low to moderately s low.

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    25/54

    Rock translational (planar) slideSl id ing of a mass o f roc k on a planar rupture su rface. The

    su rface may be s tepped forward. No internal deformation.

    The sl ide head may be sepa-rating from stable rock along

    a deep, vert ical tension c rack. Usual ly extremely rapid.

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    26/54

    Rock wedge slideSlid ing of a mass o f rock on a rupture surface formed of

    two planes w ith downslope-or iented intersect ion. No

    internal deformation . Usual ly extremely rapid .

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    27/54

    Rock compound slide

    Scatter River, North-east British Columbia

    (Hungr et al., 1984

    Slid ing of a mass of roc k on a rupture sur face cons is t ing

    of several planes, or a su rface of uneven curv ature, so that

    mot ion is kinemat ical ly possib le only i f accompanied bysign i f icant internal distor t ion of the moving m ass. Horst-

    and-graben features at the head and many secondary

    shear su rfaces are typical . Parts o f the ruptu re sur face

    may develop by shear ing through the rock. Slow o r rapid.

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    28/54

    Compound sliding

    Internal deformationrequired

    Graben

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    29/54

    Vaiont (1963)

    A compound slide(Mencl, Hutchinson) non-circular

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    30/54

    Rock irregular slide (rock collapse)

    view

    section

    randomjoints

    Sl id ing o f a rock mass on an irregu lar rupture surface

    cons ist ing of a number of random ly-or iented jo ints,

    separated by segments of intact rock (rock bridges).Occurs in strong rocks wi th non-sys temat ic structure.

    Fai lure mechanism is very complex and often di f ficul t to

    descr ibe. May includ e elements o f toppl ing. Often very

    sudden and extremely rapid.

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    31/54

    Clay, silt rotational slide (Soil slump)Slid ing o f a mass of (homogeneous and usu-ally cohesive)

    so i l on a cyl ind r ical or ell ipsoidal rup ture su rface. Li t t le

    internal deformat ion. Normally s low, bu t may be extremely

    rapid in sensi t ive or co l laps ive soi ls.

    rupture

    surface

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    32/54

    Clay, silt planar slideSlid ing o f a block o f cohesive so i l on an incl ined planar

    rup ture surface, form ed by a weak layer (usual ly pre-sheared).

    The head o f the s l ide mass separates from stable soi l along a

    deep tens ion c rack (no active wedge). May be slow or rap id.

    Panama Canal

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    33/54

    Sand, Gravel,Debris slideSl iding o f a mass o f granu lar mater ial on a shal low, planar

    su rface paral lel wi th the ground . Usual ly, the sl id ing massis a veneer of c ol luvium , weath-ered so i l , or py roc last ic

    depos i ts rest ing on a stronger su bstrate. Many debr is

    sl ides become f low -l ike after mov ing a short distance and

    trans form into extremely rapid debr is ava-lanches.

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    34/54

    Sl id ing o f a mass of so i l on arupture sur face cons is t ing of

    several planes, or a su rface of

    uneven cu rvature, so that

    mot ion is k inemat ica lly po ssib le

    only i f accompanied by

    sign i f icant internal distor t ion of

    the moving mass. Horst-and-

    graben features at the head and

    many secondary shear surfacesare observed. The basal

    segment of the rupture surface

    often fol lows a weak ho r izon in

    the soi l strat igraphy

    Clay, siltcompound slide

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    35/54

    Rock slopespread

    (or deformation?)Crest sagging in

    s lopes formed from a

    stro nger layer (caprock ) over weak rock.

    Block s of the stronger

    rock sp read and t i l t by

    deformation of th e

    under ly ing weak

    mater ial, w ithout the

    formation o f a def ined

    rup ture surface.

    Extremely s low.

    Nemcok, 1982, Weak rocks

    Initial stage, Mature stage, Final stage, Surficialmovements

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    36/54

    Sand, silt liquefaction spreadExtremely rapid lateral spreading o f a series of so i l block s,

    f loat ing on a layer of saturated (loose) granu lar so i l , l iquefied

    by earthquake shaking o r spon taneous l iquefact ion.

    TurnagainHeights Slide,1964

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    37/54

    Sensitive clay spreadExtremely rapid lateral sp reading o f a series o f

    coherent c lay b lock s, f loat ing on a layer of

    remoulded sensit iv e clay.

    St. Jude,Quebec, 2010

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    38/54

    Rock avalancheExtremely rapid, massive, f low -l ike mo t ion of

    fragmented roc k from a large rock sl ide or rock fal l .

    Frank Slide,1903

    Inverse sorting

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    39/54

    Slow o r rapid f low -l ikemovement of loose dry,

    moist o r saturated,

    sor ted o r unsor ted

    granu lar material,

    w i thout excess pore-

    pressure.

    Dry (or non-liquefied)Sand, Silt, Gravel or

    Debris Flow

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    40/54

    Very rapid to extremely rapid f low of sorted or unsortedsaturated granular mater ia l on m oderate slopes, involv ing

    excess pore-pressu re or l iquefact ion of mater ial

    or ig inat ing from the lands l ide source. Usual ly or ig inates

    as a mult ip le retrog ressiv e fai lure. Often under water.

    Sand, Sil t , Debris flow slid e:

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    41/54

    Very rapid to extremely rapid f low of

    l iquef ied sensi t ive clay, due to remou lding

    du ring a mu lt ip le retrogressive sl ide fai lure

    at, or close to the orig inal water content .

    (Photo: S.G. Evans)

    Clay flow slide

  • 8/13/2019 Landslide Classification

    42/54

    Debris flow:Very rapid to extr emely

    rap id surg ing f low of

    saturated non-plast ic

    debr is in a steepchannel. Strong

    entrainment of mater ial

    and water from the f low

    path . (Plastic i ty Index