l. j. ott oak ridge national laboratory
DESCRIPTION
NRC Perspectives on Reactor Safety Course Special Features of BWR Severe Accident Mitigation and Progression. Appendix 2B-7 Module 3 Section 7 Module 4 Section 7. L. J. Ott Oak Ridge National Laboratory. BWR Severe Accident Studies Were Conducted at Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1980-1999. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Slide 1
NRC Perspectives on Reactor Safety Course
Special Features of BWR Severe Accident Mitigation and Progression
L. J. OttOak Ridge National Laboratory
Appendix 2B-7Module 3 Section 7Module 4 Section 7
Slide 2
BWR Severe Accident Studies Were Conducted at Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1980-1999
Follow-on to NRC Severe Accident Sequence Analysis (SASA) Programs initiated late 1980 Response to Three Mile Island PWR studies
SNL INL LANL
BWR studies ORNL Evaluations of Owners Group Emergency
Procedure and Severe Accident Guidelines for NRR
Slide 3
BWR Severe Accident Technology Activities at ORNL
Accident progression Event sequence Timing Code application and model development
Analytical support of experiments Pretest planning Posttest analyses Diverse locations
ACRR (Sandia) NRU (Chalk River) CORA (Karlsruhe)
Accident management strategies Preventive Mitigative
Extension to advanced reactor designs
Slide 4
Predicted BWR Severe Accident Response Is Different from That Expected of a PWR in Several Aspects
Much more zirconium metal Isolated reactor vessel Reduction in power factor in the outer core region Effects of safety relief valve actuations Progressive relocation of core structures Importance of core plate boundary Steel structures in vessel Large amount of water in vessel lower plenum
Slide 5
Boiling Water Reactor Contributors to Core Damage Frequency – NUREG-1150
Slide 6
Station Blackout Involves Failure of AC Electrical Power Loss of offsite power Emergency diesel-generators do not start and load
Short-TermStation Blackout
Immediate Loss ofWater Makeup
Long-TermStation Blackout
Loss of Water Makeup Following Battery
Exhaustion
Slide 7
The Most Probable BWR Accident Sequence Involving Loss of Injection Is Station Blackout
Peach BottomShort-term 5%Long-Term 42%
Grand GulfShort-term 96%Long-Term 1%
Susquehanna*Short-term 52%Long-Term 10%
Station Blackout CoreDamage Frequencies
*From Plant IPE (NPE 86-003)
Slide 8
If the Reactor Vessel Remains Pressurized, Relocating Core Debris Falls into Water above the Core Plate
Grand GulfShort Term
Station Blackout without ADS
Actuation
Slide 9
Release of Debris Liquids through Penetration Internals Has Been Extensively Analyzed
Control rod drive mechanism penetrations: secure
Vessel drain: very improbable Instrument tube: most likely
internal path
Slide 10
The BWR Control Rod Drive Mechanism Assemblies Are Held in Place by Upper Stub Tube Welds; the Incore Instrument Tubes Are Supported by Welds at the Vessel Wall
Slide 11
The Drywell Floor Area Is Small and the Drywell Shell Is Within Ten Feet of the Pedestal Doorway
Slide 12
Inside the Reactor Pedestal at Peach Bottom
Slide 13
Lower Drywell at Browns Ferry
Slide 14
BWR Evolution
Slide 15
Comparison of ESBWR and ABWR
Key parameters that increase core flow in ESBWR Shorter fuel Tall chimney Unrestricted downcomer
Slide 16
Safety Systems Inside Containment Envelope
Slide 17
Slide 18
Breakdown by Initiating Event