kruglikova

16
Environmental NGOs and Businesses: Friends of Foes? Green alliances as a path to sustainable development Nina Kruglikova Student Summit for Sustainability Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada 13 May 2008

Upload: wsc-sd

Post on 23-Jan-2015

738 views

Category:

Business


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Kruglikova

Environmental NGOs and Businesses: Friends of Foes?Green alliances as a path to sustainable development

Nina Kruglikova

Student Summit for Sustainability Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

13 May 2008

Page 2: Kruglikova

Outline

Historical Perspective Drivers for Change Challenges Typology of Green Alliances Case studies (e.g. Greenfreeze) Different Approaches in US and Europe Conclusions

Page 3: Kruglikova

Historical Perspective 1960s and1970s:ENGOs – boycotts and protestsBusinesses – no response

1980s:ENGOs – public environmental pressureBusinesses – environmental policies, annual reports, auditing, eco-labelling

1990s:ENGOs -shift from problem-focused to solution-oriented advocacyBusinesses - search for less confrontational relations with ENGOs

Page 4: Kruglikova

Drivers for Change: companies’ perspectives

NGO credibility with public on issues

Desire to head off negative public confrontation

Desire to engage stakeholders

Greater efficiency in resource allocation

Competitive advantage of companies with reputation for environmental responsibility

Page 5: Kruglikova

Drivers for Change: ENGOs’ perspectives

Disenchantment with government as provider of solutions

Credibility of business with government

Need for more resources (funding, technical expertise)

Growing interest in markets

Source: Sustainability 1996

Page 6: Kruglikova

What can ENGOs give businesses? help businesses track developments n

regulations Spot their environmental vulnerabilities before

they become fatal flaws Save money on R&D by providing solutions Inspire consumer confidence and credibility Endorse products

Page 7: Kruglikova

Challenges: Hard-Liners in ENGO community

‘Window-dressing’ ‘Potential minefield’ ‘Painting the deck-chairs on the Titanic a

lighter shade of green’ ‘Shifting the battle for the environment from

the courtroom to the boardroom’ ‘Abandoning boats for suits’ ‘Buy-sell of indulgencies’ ‘greenwash’

Page 8: Kruglikova

Typology of Green Alliances

Licensing Corporate sponsorship Product endorsement Task force Green systems alliance Green public policy alliance

Source: Hartman and Stafford (1997)

Page 9: Kruglikova

Case Studies

WWF and Unilever: Marine Stewardship Council

US Environmental Defence and McDonald’s/General Motors

Alliance for Environmental Innovation and S.C. Johnson&Son, Inc.

GREENFREEZE - Greenpeace and Foron (1991) ‘The other cold war’ ‘The story of the little East German David vs the big West German industry Goliath’ ‘The German EPA’s prestigious Blue Angel Eco-label’

Page 10: Kruglikova

ENGOs-Business Partnerships

US: more cooperative ‘corporate citizenship’ Three Miles Island Nuclear Accident and Exxon Valdez Oil

Spill

Europe:

less cooperative ‘corporate social responsibility’ Brent Spar and Nigerian Ogoni UK - pioneer

Page 11: Kruglikova

Reasons for this Difference Different level of reliance on the authoritiesUS: no strong role of central government, DIY approachEurope: strong belief in ‘finger pointing’ power of governm. Different level of public supportUS: 1/3 of Americans attempt to avoid boycotted brandsEurope: ½ of Europeans attempt to avoid boycotted brands Different level of philanthropyUS: long-established tradition of charitable donationsEurope: ‘sponsorship scam’ approach? Different level of trust of businesses and NGOsUS: 4 most trusted brands are corporationsEurope: 4 most trusted brands are NGOs

Page 12: Kruglikova

Source: The Fourth Edelman Survey on Trust and Credibility.(2003)

13%

16%

25%

29%

30%

35%

36%

36%

37%

40%

41%

45%

47%

47%

49%

52%

54%

55%

56%

59%

66%

69%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

HSBC*

Oxfam*

Unilever*

Royal Dutch/ Shell

Deutsche Bank

ExxonMobil

Monsanto

BASF

Citicorp

Dow Chemical

Greenpeace

Amnesty International

Nike

Merck

World Wildlife Fund

Pfizer

Bayer

McDonalds

Ford Motor Company

Microsoft

Coca-Cola

J ohnson & J ohnson

Page 13: Kruglikova

Source: The Fourth Edelman Survey on Trust and Credibility.(2003)

12%

14%

16%

21%

22%

25%

27%

28%

30%

32%

34%

34%

36%

37%

38%

42%

47%

49%

51%

62%

62%

34%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Monsanto*

Citicorp*

Dow Chemical*

Pfizer*

McDonalds

HSBC*

Merck*

ExxonMobil

Deutsche Bank

Royal Dutch/ Shell

Nike

Johnson & Johnson

Unilever

BASF

Coca-Cola

Ford Motor Company

Bayer

Microsoft

Oxfam

Greenpeace

World Wildlife Fund

Amnesty International

Page 14: Kruglikova

Conclusions

ENGOs are increasingly exercising their stakes in corporate affairs, whereas businesses are staking their claim in the ENGO sector

Win-win solutions: each partner should have smth to give to and gain from

Need to educate businesses what NGOs can offer

Need to help ENGOs sell their agendas and capabilities – not themselves – to businesses

Reasonable balance between carrot-led approach of cooperation and stick-driven approach of confrontation

Page 15: Kruglikova

On our way to sustainable development....

...businesses are not only

part of the problem but also part of the solution!

Page 16: Kruglikova

Contact

[email protected]

Thanks for your attention! Questions?

Comments?