kayla jordan d. wayne mitchell rstats institute missouri state university

16
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University

Upload: donna-pearson

Post on 11-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University

STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING

Kayla Jordan

D. Wayne Mitchell

RStats Institute

Missouri State University

Page 2: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University

What is SEM?

Statistical technique useful for testing theoretical models

Theory-driven Confirmatory

Page 3: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University

Types of Variables

Latent VariableExogenous Variable

Manifest or Observed Variable Error

Residual

Endogenous

Page 4: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University

Types of Models

Measurement Model Structural Model

Page 5: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University

Degrees of Freedom

Knowns: n(n+1)/2 -> 8(9)/2 -> 36 Unknowns: 5 factor loadings, 2 path coefficients, 8

error variances, 2 residuals -> 17 total unknowns Degrees of Freedom: Knowns – Unknowns -> 19

Page 6: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University

Estimates

Page 7: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University

Factor LoadingsRegression Weights: (Group number 1 - Default model)

Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label

H1 <--- Harm 1.000

H2 <--- Harm 1.020 .112 9.105 ***

H3 <--- Harm 1.096 .111 9.843 ***

H4 <--- Harm .883 .112 7.900 ***

H5 <--- Harm .692 .153 4.508 ***

H6 <--- Harm .643 .171 3.754 ***

Standardized Regression Weights: (Group number 1 - Default model)

Estimate

H1 <--- Harm .716 H2 <--- Harm .705 H3 <--- Harm .768 H4 <--- Harm .608 H5 <--- Harm .344 H6 <--- Harm .286

Indicates all observed variables are measuring the latent variable.

Values closer to one indicate that the observed variable is measuring latent better (e.g., H3 is a better item than H6)

Page 8: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University

Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Page 9: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University

Path Analysis

Page 10: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University

Full Structural Model

Page 11: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University

Multi-Trait, Multi-Method

Page 12: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University

Fit IndicesModel Fit Summary

CMIN

Model NPAR CMIN DF P CMIN/DF Default model 70 1021.692 395 .000 2.587 Saturated model 465 .000 0 Independence model 30 2715.382 435 .000 6.242

Baseline Comparisons

Model NFI

Delta1 RFI

rho1 IFI

Delta2 TLI

rho2 CFI

Default model .624 .586 .730 .697 .725 Saturated model 1.000

1.000

1.000

Independence model .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

RMSEA

Model RMSEA LO 90 HI 90 PCLOSE Default model .089 .082 .096 .000 Independence model .162 .156 .168 .000

Page 13: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University

Model Comparisons Need for Multiple Models Chi-Square Difference CFI Difference

Page 14: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University

Assumptions Sample Size Normality Outliers Multicollinearity

Page 15: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University

Programs

Page 16: Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University

Questions?

Contact: [email protected]