juvenile detention profile trends - home - bscc · juvenile detention profile survey. county adp %...

Board of State and Community Corrections

Juvenile Detention Profile Survey

Data Caveats & Limitations

The following caveats and limitations have been identified for the Juvenile Detention Profile Survey data:

• Source data can be queried at http://app.bscc.ca.gov/joq/jds/QuerySelection.asp

• We make every effort to verify the submitted data to ensure its accuracy, but it is ultimately up to the jurisdictions

(counties) to report reliable data.

• We do not collect details on policies that jurisdictions enforce that might influence these data.

• A number of juvenile facilities have opened and closed from 2002 through 2019. These changes might affect how the

data are represented.

o Mariposa County: Mariposa County operates a Special Purpose Juvenile Hall. A Special Purpose Juvenile Hall is

a county facility used for temporary confinement of youth, not to exceed 96 hours, prior to transfer to a full

service juvenile facility or release. Facility-level data provided does not provide meaningful trends, thus are

excluded from this document.

o Mono County: Mono County operated a Special Purpose Juvenile Hall between 2002 and March 2014. Facility-

level data provided does not provide meaningful trends, thus are excluded from this document.

o Plumas County: Plumas County operated a Special Purpose Juvenile Hall between 2002 and March 2008.

Facility-level data provided does not provide meaningful trends, thus are excluded from this document.

o Trinity County: Trinity County's Juvenile Hall converted to a Special Purpose Juvenile Hall in August 2014.

of 266



Table 1. Statewide Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002 11,129 3,548 32% 7,579 68% 11,113 3,879 35% 7,234 65%2003 10,919 3,491 32% 7,428 68% 10,918 3,706 34% 7,212 66%2004 10,643 3,800 36% 6,843 64% 10,663 3,494 33% 7,170 67%2005 10,917 3,991 37% 6,924 63% 10,817 3,638 34% 7,179 66%2006 11,272 4,202 37% 7,069 63% 11,063 3,557 32% 7,506 68%2007 11,139 4,189 38% 6,948 62% 10,925 3,271 30% 7,653 70%2008 10,952 3,816 35% 7,136 65% 10,781 3,151 29% 7,630 71%2009 10,040 3,472 35% 6,570 65% 9,930 2,833 29% 7,097 71%2010 9,100 3,037 33% 6,062 67% 9,081 2,712 30% 6,370 70%2011 8,245 2,622 32% 5,621 68% 8,144 2,441 30% 5,704 70%2012 7,360 2,377 32% 4,982 68% 7,346 2,223 30% 5,123 70%2013 6,628 2,117 32% 4,511 68% 6,674 2,080 31% 4,593 69%2014 5,781 1,953 34% 3,828 66% 5,788 1,905 33% 3,882 67%2015 5,307 1,964 37% 3,343 63% 5,357 1,956 37% 3,401 63%2016 4,695 1,790 38% 2,904 62% 4,687 1,542 33% 3,145 67%2017 4,462 1,757 39% 2,707 61% 4,465 1,404 31% 3,061 69%2018 4,013 1,661 41% 2,350 59% 3,999 1,094 27% 2,905 73%2019 3,692 1,566 42% 2,127 58% 3,702 1,017 27% 2,686 73%Note. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.

Average Daily Population One-Day Snapshot Pre-Disposition Post-Disposition Snapshot

AMPMisdemeanor Felony

BSCC JDPS data as of July 29, 2019. 12019 data through first quarter only (Jan-Mar). of 266



Table 2. Statewide Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002 6,574 3,548 54% 3,025 46% 6,559 2,365 36% 4,194 64%2003 6,450 3,491 54% 2,960 46% 6,408 2,235 35% 4,173 65%2004 6,461 3,800 59% 2,662 41% 6,441 2,198 34% 4,243 66%2005 6,819 3,991 59% 2,828 41% 6,716 2,380 35% 4,336 65%2006 7,019 4,202 60% 2,817 40% 6,847 2,262 33% 4,585 67%2007 6,860 4,189 61% 2,670 39% 6,669 1,987 30% 4,682 70%2008 6,615 3,816 58% 2,798 42% 6,367 1,881 30% 4,486 70%2009 6,201 3,472 56% 2,727 44% 6,016 1,833 30% 4,183 70%2010 5,724 3,037 53% 2,687 47% 5,584 1,890 34% 3,694 66%2011 5,140 2,622 51% 2,516 49% 5,003 1,722 34% 3,281 66%2012 4,549 2,377 52% 2,171 48% 4,518 1,570 35% 2,948 65%2013 4,104 2,117 52% 1,987 48% 4,134 1,446 35% 2,688 65%2014 3,640 1,953 54% 1,687 46% 3,577 1,341 37% 2,236 63%2015 3,409 1,964 58% 1,446 42% 3,390 1,382 41% 2,008 59%2016 3,034 1,790 59% 1,243 41% 2,975 1,092 37% 1,883 63%2017 2,910 1,757 60% 1,157 40% 2,889 952 33% 1,937 67%2018 2,673 1,661 62% 1,011 38% 2,643 778 29% 1,866 71%2019 2,485 1,566 63% 920 37% 2,467 740 30% 1,726 70%Note. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.






Table 3. Statewide Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20191

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002 4,555 100% 4,554 1,514 33% 3,040 67%2003 4,469 100% 4,510 1,472 33% 3,038 67%2004 4,182 100% 4,222 1,296 31% 2,926 69%2005 4,097 100% 4,101 1,258 31% 2,843 69%2006 4,253 100% 4,216 1,295 31% 2,921 69%2007 4,279 100% 4,255 1,284 30% 2,971 70%2008 4,337 100% 4,414 1,270 29% 3,144 71%2009 3,840 100% 3,914 1,000 26% 2,914 74%2010 3,376 100% 3,497 821 23% 2,676 77%2011 3,105 100% 3,141 718 23% 2,423 77%2012 2,812 100% 2,828 653 23% 2,175 77%2013 2,524 100% 2,540 634 25% 1,905 75%2014 2,141 100% 2,211 564 26% 1,646 74%2015 1,897 100% 1,967 574 29% 1,393 71%2016 1,661 100% 1,712 450 26% 1,263 74%2017 1,552 100% 1,576 451 29% 1,125 71%2018 1,340 100% 1,356 316 23% 1,039 77%2019 1,207 100% 1,236 276 22% 959 78%Note. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.



Juvenile Camps/Ranches only house Post-Disposition juveniles, therefore their Total ADP is only comprised of Post-Disposition juveniles.




Figure 1. Statewide ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)

Juvenile Hall Population Camp/Ranch Population Juvenile Facilities Population




Figure 2. Population of Statewide Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)

Pre-Disposition Post-Disposition




Figure 3. Statewide Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

58%

60%

62%

64%

66%

68%

70%

72%

74%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




County ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMPAlameda 83 44 52% 40 48% 82 24 30% 58 70%Butte 22 8 38% 13 62% 22 0 0% 22 100%Contra Costa 126 50 40% 76 60% 139 33 23% 107 77%Del Norte 0 0 0 0El Dorado 21 13 61% 8 39% 21 15 72% 6 28%Fresno 206 71 35% 134 65% 206 36 17% 170 83%Humboldt 20 19 96% 1 6% 20 14 69% 6 31%Imperial 18 13 74% 5 26% 18 5 28% 13 72%Inyo2 0 0 n/a 0 n/a 0 0 n/a 0 n/aKern 241 52 22% 188 78% 246 112 46% 133 54%Kings 29 15 51% 14 49% 29 4 13% 26 88%Lassen 3 0 10% 3 87% 2 0 0% 2 100%Los Angeles 840 284 34% 556 66% 833 219 26% 614 74%Madera 39 17 43% 22 57% 39 16 41% 23 59%Marin 13 6 43% 7 56% 12 9 78% 3 22%Mariposa 0 0 n/a 0 n/a 0 0 n/a 0 n/aMendocino 14 8 60% 6 41% 13 4 28% 10 73%Merced 39 7 17% 33 84% 39 2 5% 37 95%Monterey 87 39 45% 48 55% 83 17 21% 66 79%Napa 15 10 67% 5 33% 15 7 48% 8 52%Nevada 5 3 70% 1 29% 4 2 54% 2 46%Orange 227 89 39% 138 61% 238 60 25% 177 75%Placer 13 3 23% 10 77% 10 3 32% 7 68%Riverside 145 63 43% 82 57% 145 25 17% 120 83%Note. 2 2019 Average Daily Population based on January - February. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.

Table 4. Combined Juvenile Facility Populations by County and Pre-Disposition, Post-Disposition, Misdemeanor, and Felony for the First Quarter of

20191

ADP 1st Quarter

2019

Average Daily Population Snapshot AMP 1st Quarter

2019

One-Day Snapshot Pre-Disposition Post-Disposition Misdemeanor Felony

Reports not received at time of posting.




County ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMPSacramento 113 92 81% 21 19% 113 48 42% 65 58%San Benito 5 2 43% 3 59% 6 4 71% 2 29%San Bernardino 147 73 50% 74 50% 151 33 22% 119 79%San Diego 310 119 38% 191 62% 317 58 18% 259 82%San Francisco 44 28 64% 16 36% 43 15 36% 27 64%San Joaquin 106 61 57% 45 43% 106 6 6% 99 94%San Luis Obispo 22 10 46% 12 56% 21 11 52% 10 48%San Mateo 58 32 55% 26 45% 59 25 42% 34 58%Santa Barbara 55 17 32% 37 68% 57 34 60% 23 40%Santa Clara 182 106 58% 76 42% 180 35 19% 145 81%Santa Cruz 17 14 82% 3 19% 17 6 37% 11 63%Shasta 25 13 51% 12 49% 25 8 32% 17 68%Siskiyou 0 0 n/a 0 n/a 0 0 n/a 0 n/aSolano 40 24 60% 16 41% 39 10 26% 29 74%Sonoma 50 20 40% 30 60% 53 27 51% 26 49%Stanislaus 84 49 58% 36 42% 84 14 17% 70 83%Tehama 26 14 53% 12 47% 27 11 42% 16 58%Trinity 2 0 0% 1 87% 1 1 100% 0 0%Tulare 77 29 38% 47 61% 75 19 25% 56 75%Tuolumne 9 4 39% 6 61% 9 3 35% 6 65%Ventura 74 36 49% 37 51% 75 31 42% 43 58%Yolo 15 1 8% 14 94% 2 0 17% 2 83%Yuba 29 10 34% 19 67% 28 7 24% 21 76%Note. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.

Table 4 (continued). Combined Juvenile Facility Populations by County and Pre-Disposition, Post-Disposition, Misdemeanor, and Felony for the First

Quarter of 20191

ADP 1st Quarter

2019

Average Daily Population Snapshot AMP 1st Quarter

2019

One-Day Snapshot Pre-Disposition Post-Disposition Misdemeanor Felony




Table 5. Alameda Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002 328 174 53% 154 47% 329 189 57% 140 43%2003 318 188 59% 129 41% 323 174 54% 149 46%2004 333 200 60% 133 40% 346 184 53% 162 47%2005 313 193 62% 120 38% 315 166 53% 148 47%2006 324 186 57% 138 43% 284 130 46% 154 54%2007 326 209 64% 116 36% 278 109 39% 169 61%2008 359 188 52% 171 48% 262 92 35% 170 65%2009 310 178 58% 131 42% 239 83 35% 156 65%2010 284 164 58% 120 42% 207 60 29% 147 71%2011 270 123 46% 147 54% 195 67 34% 128 66%2012 251 90 36% 161 64% 249 109 44% 140 56%2013 215 89 41% 126 59% 215 90 42% 125 58%2014 199 89 45% 110 55% 197 71 36% 127 64%2015 160 70 44% 90 56% 163 65 40% 98 60%2016 106 52 49% 53 50% 107 41 38% 67 62%2017 97 46 48% 51 53% 97 35 36% 62 64%2018 82 41 50% 41 50% 82 28 34% 54 66%2019 83 44 52% 40 48% 82 24 30% 58 70%

ALAMEDA COUNTY

Note. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.






Table 6. Alameda Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002 259 174 67% 86 33% 252 148 59% 104 41%2003 243 188 78% 55 22% 234 125 54% 109 46%2004 249 200 80% 49 20% 244 132 54% 112 46%2005 238 193 81% 45 19% 237 128 54% 109 46%2006 247 186 75% 61 25% 206 95 46% 111 54%2007 255 209 82% 46 18% 202 83 41% 119 59%2008 278 188 68% 90 32% 180 71 39% 109 61%2009 245 178 73% 67 27% 174 63 36% 112 64%2010 231 164 71% 66 29% 154 45 30% 108 70%2011 220 123 56% 97 44% 144 45 32% 98 68%2012 201 90 45% 111 55% 200 88 44% 111 56%2013 175 89 51% 86 49% 174 72 41% 102 59%2014 161 89 55% 72 45% 160 62 39% 97 61%2015 133 70 53% 63 47% 136 57 42% 78 58%2016 87 52 60% 35 40% 88 34 39% 54 61%2017 78 46 59% 32 41% 77 30 39% 47 61%2018 66 41 61% 25 38% 65 24 36% 42 64%2019 67 44 65% 24 36% 65 20 31% 45 69%Note. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.






Table 7. Alameda Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20191

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002 69 100% 77 41 53% 36 47%2003 75 100% 89 49 55% 40 45%2004 84 100% 102 52 51% 50 49%2005 75 100% 77 38 49% 39 51%2006 77 100% 78 35 45% 43 55%2007 71 100% 76 27 35% 49 65%2008 81 100% 82 21 25% 61 75%2009 64 100% 64 20 31% 45 69%2010 53 100% 53 15 28% 38 72%2011 50 100% 52 22 42% 30 58%2012 50 100% 50 21 42% 29 58%2013 40 100% 41 18 44% 23 56%2014 38 100% 38 8 22% 29 78%2015 28 100% 27 8 29% 20 71%2016 18 100% 19 6 33% 13 67%2017 19 100% 20 5 26% 15 74%2018 16 100% 17 4 26% 13 74%2019 16 100% 17 4 24% 13 76%Note. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.







Figure 4. Alameda ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 5. Population of Alameda Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 6. Alameda Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 8. Butte Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


BUTTE COUNTY







Table 9. Butte Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191







Table 10. Butte Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 20142 through 2019

1

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014 14 100% 14 0 0% 14 100%2015 9 100% 9 0 2% 9 98%2016 9 100% 9 0 0% 9 100%2017 12 100% 12 0 0% 12 100%2018 7 100% 7 0 0% 7 100%2019 5 100% 5 0 0% 5 100%Note. 2 2014 Average Daily Population based on July - December. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.




Butte County's Camp opened July 2014.




Figure 7. Butte ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002 through

20191

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 8. Population of Butte Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002 through

20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 9. Butte Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 11. Colusa Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20111

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002 97 100% 97 9 9% 89 91%2003 91 100% 91 13 14% 78 86%2004 77 100% 75 9 12% 66 88%2005 51 100% 51 6 12% 45 88%2006 53 100% 54 8 14% 47 86%2007 58 100% 63 12 19% 51 81%2008 57 100% 58 5 9% 52 91%2009 45 100% 49 3 7% 45 93%2010 44 100% 45 2 5% 42 95%2011 45 100% 45 2 4% 43 96%

Colusa County's Camp closed June 2011Note. 1 2011 Average Daily Population based on January - June. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population

COLUSA COUNTY



Juvenile Camp/Ranches only house Post-Disposition juveniles, therefore their Total ADP is only comprised of Post-Disposition juveniles.

BSCC JDPS data as of July 29, 2019. of 266



Figure 10. Colusa Juvenile Camp/Ranch ADP for 2002 through 20111

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)

Camp/Ranch Population




Figure 11. Colusa Felony Population for the Juvenile Camp/Ranch as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20111

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 12. Contra Costa Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


CONTRA COSTA COUNTY






Table 13. Contra Costa Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191







Table 14. Contra Costa Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20191








Figure 12. Contra Costa ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for

2002 through 20191

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 13. Population of Contra Costa Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 14. Contra Costa Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through

20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 15. Del Norte Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002 41 6 13% 36 87% 41 8 20% 33 80%2003 44 6 13% 38 86% 44 14 32% 30 68%2004 41 6 15% 35 85% 42 16 38% 26 62%2005 40 7 17% 33 83% 39 14 36% 25 64%2006 38 6 17% 32 83% 37 14 37% 23 63%2007 38 6 17% 32 84% 28 3 11% 25 89%2008 41 7 17% 34 83% 30 3 8% 28 92%2009 33 6 18% 27 83% 26 3 12% 23 88%2010 36 5 15% 31 85% 34 10 30% 24 70%2011 32 6 19% 26 82% 31 7 21% 25 79%2012 34 6 18% 28 82% 35 10 29% 25 71%2013 32 5 16% 26 83% 33 9 29% 23 71%2014 27 4 16% 22 83% 25 6 26% 18 74%2015 32 5 17% 26 83% 31 4 12% 28 88%2016 21 4 18% 17 83% 21 6 27% 15 73%2017 12 4 33% 8 67% 12 6 47% 6 53%2018 9 4 45% 5 55% 9 4 47% 5 53%2019

DEL NORTE COUNTY



Reports not received at time of posting.Note. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.




Table 16. Del Norte Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002 14 6 40% 8 60% 13 8 66% 4 34%2003 18 6 32% 12 67% 18 14 77% 4 23%2004 18 6 34% 12 67% 19 16 82% 4 18%2005 18 7 39% 11 61% 16 14 86% 2 14%2006 15 6 42% 9 58% 16 14 84% 3 16%2007 15 6 42% 9 58% 5 3 62% 2 38%2008 15 7 46% 8 54% 5 3 52% 2 48%2009 11 6 51% 6 50% 5 3 69% 1 31%2010 12 5 46% 6 54% 12 10 86% 2 14%2011 12 6 50% 6 51% 11 7 57% 5 43%2012 12 6 51% 6 49% 13 10 76% 3 24%2013 9 5 59% 4 41% 10 9 88% 1 13%2014 10 4 45% 5 55% 8 5 63% 3 37%2015 9 5 63% 3 35% 8 4 43% 5 57%2016 8 4 44% 5 55% 8 6 73% 2 27%2017 8 4 48% 4 53% 9 5 64% 3 36%2018 9 4 45% 5 55% 9 4 47% 5 53%2019

Snapshot AMP


Misdemeanor FelonyAverage Daily Population One-Day Snapshot


Reports not received at time of posting.




Table 17. Del Norte Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20172

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002 28 100% 29 0 0% 29 100%2003 26 100% 26 0 0% 26 100%2004 23 100% 22 0 0% 22 100%2005 23 100% 23 0 0% 23 100%2006 23 100% 21 0 0% 21 100%2007 23 100% 23 0 0% 23 100%2008 26 100% 26 0 0% 26 100%2009 21 100% 21 0 0% 21 100%2010 24 100% 22 0 0% 22 100%2011 20 100% 20 0 0% 20 100%2012 22 100% 23 1 3% 22 97%2013 23 100% 23 1 3% 22 97%2014 17 100% 17 2 9% 15 91%2015 23 100% 23 0 1% 23 99%2016 13 100% 13 0 0% 13 100%2017 5 100% 5 0 9% 4 91%2018Note. 2 2017 Average Daily Population based on January - September. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.

Del Norte's Camp closed in September 2017







Figure 15. Del Norte ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 16. Population of Del Norte Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 17. Del Norte Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 18. El Dorado Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


EL DORADO COUNTY






Table 19. El Dorado Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191







Table 20. El Dorado Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 20062 through 2019

1

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP20022003200420052006 9 100% 9 5 54% 4 46%2007 10 100% 10 5 46% 6 54%2008 9 100% 10 3 34% 6 66%2009 9 100% 9 4 50% 4 50%2010 8 100% 8 4 53% 4 47%2011 10 100% 10 5 56% 4 44%2012 7 100% 7 5 68% 2 32%2013 6 100% 6 4 69% 2 31%2014 7 100% 7 6 83% 1 17%2015 4 100% 3 3 80% 1 20%2016 8 100% 9 8 89% 1 11%2017 6 100% 7 5 77% 2 23%2018 5 100% 5 4 71% 1 29%2019 4 100% 4 3 62% 2 38%Note. 2 2006 Average Daily Population based on March- December. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.



El Dorado County's Camp opened March 2006.





Figure 18. El Dorado ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 19. Population of El Dorado Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 20. El Dorado Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 21. Fresno Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


FRESNO COUNTY






Table 22. Fresno Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191







Table 23. Fresno Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20191








Figure 21. Fresno ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 22. Population of Fresno Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 23. Fresno Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 24. Glenn Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20171

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002 12 7 59% 5 42% 13 9 67% 4 33%2003 7 4 53% 3 47% 7 6 88% 1 12%2004 18 9 49% 9 51% 17 11 65% 6 35%2005 23 11 47% 12 53% 23 14 63% 8 37%2006 19 8 44% 11 56% 20 13 65% 7 35%2007 18 6 36% 11 64% 17 7 39% 10 61%2008 17 8 49% 9 51% 17 3 19% 14 81%2009 16 7 45% 9 55% 16 6 37% 10 63%2010 15 8 55% 7 45% 15 8 52% 7 48%2011 13 6 46% 7 53% 13 4 31% 9 69%2012 11 6 50% 6 49% 10 5 49% 5 51%2013 15 7 47% 8 53% 15 6 39% 9 61%2014 12 4 37% 8 64% 12 6 53% 6 47%2015 8 3 45% 4 53% 9 6 75% 2 25%2016 8 3 39% 5 61% 8 7 80% 2 20%2017 6 3 54% 3 46% 8 5 62% 3 38%

Glenn County closed their Juvenile Hall in June 2017

Note. 1 2017 Average Daily Population based on January - June. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.

GLENN COUNTY






Figure 24. Glenn Juvenile Hall Population 2002 through 20171

0

5

10

15

20

25

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)

Juvenile Hall Population




Figure 25. Population of Glenn Juvenile Hall by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002 through

20171

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 26. Population of Glenn Juvenile Hall by Misdemeanor and Felony as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20171

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 25. Humboldt Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


HUMBOLDT COUNTY






Figure 27. Humboldt Juvenile Hall Population for 2002 through 20191

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 28. Population of Humboldt Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 29. Humboldt Juvenile Hall Felony Population as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 26. Imperial Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


IMPERIAL COUNTY






Figure 30. Imperial Juvenile Hall Population for 2002 through 20191

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 31. Population of Imperial Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 32. Imperial Juvenile Hall Felony Population as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 27. Inyo Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002 6 3 41% 4 59% 6 4 64% 2 36%2003 9 4 41% 6 59% 10 8 78% 2 22%2004 11 5 43% 6 57% 12 8 66% 4 34%2005 11 4 33% 7 66% 11 7 61% 4 39%2006 10 3 33% 7 67% 10 8 75% 3 25%2007 10 3 29% 7 71% 10 9 86% 1 14%2008 11 5 45% 6 55% 12 9 74% 3 26%2009 11 4 38% 7 62% 11 9 77% 3 23%2010 12 4 37% 8 63% 12 9 74% 3 26%2011 8 4 50% 4 50% 7 3 47% 4 53%2012 7 3 44% 4 56% 7 3 41% 4 59%2013 7 4 62% 2 38% 6 2 37% 4 63%2014 5 2 48% 2 51% 5 3 55% 2 45%2015 4 2 54% 2 46% 4 3 80% 1 20%2016 2 2 82% 0 18% 2 1 52% 1 48%2017 0 0 n/a 0 n/a 0 0 n/a 0 n/a2018 0 0 n/a 0 n/a 0 0 n/a 0 n/a2019 0 0 n/a 0 n/a 0 0 n/a 0 0%Note. Inyo's Juvenile Hall converted to a Special Purpose Juvenile Hall in January 2017. A Special Purpose Juvenile Hall is a county facility used for temporary confinement of youth, not to exceed 96 hours, prior to transfer to a full service juvenile facility or release. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.

INYO COUNTY






Figure 33. Inyo Juvenile Hall Population for 2002 through 20191

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 34. Population of Inyo Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002 through

20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 35. Inyo Juvenile Hall Felony Population as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 28. Kern Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


KERN COUNTY






Table 29. Kern Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191







Table 30. Kern Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20191








Figure 36. Kern ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 37. Population of Kern Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002 through

20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 38. Kern Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 31. Kings Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


KINGS COUNTY






Table 32. Kings Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191







Table 33. Kings Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20191








Figure 39. Kings ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 40. Population of Kings Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002 through

20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 41. Kings Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 34. Lake Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20151

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002 30 17 56% 13 44% 17 8 43% 10 57%2003 35 15 42% 20 58% 18 8 41% 11 59%2004 36 16 44% 20 56% 21 10 46% 11 54%2005 35 15 42% 20 58% 24 10 41% 14 59%2006 39 16 42% 22 58% 27 12 44% 15 56%2007 38 17 43% 22 57% 28 13 47% 15 53%2008 32 11 36% 21 64% 19 11 58% 8 42%2009 21 10 47% 11 53% 15 7 44% 8 56%2010 14 6 45% 8 55% 7 3 38% 4 62%2011 12 6 46% 7 54% 7 4 58% 3 42%2012 17 10 57% 7 43% 11 4 34% 8 66%2013 20 9 46% 11 54% 12 4 38% 7 62%2014 14 8 57% 6 43% 8 5 67% 3 33%2015 10 6 64% 3 36% 5 3 63% 2 37%

LAKE COUNTY



Lake County closed their Juvenile Hall in October 2015

Note. 1 2015 Average Daily Population based on January - October. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.




Figure 42. Lake Juvenile Hall Population for 2002 through 20151

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 43. Population of Lake Juvenile Hall by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002 through

20151

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 44. Population of Lake Juvenile Hall by Misdemeanor and Felony as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20151

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 35. Lassen Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


LASSEN COUNTY






Figure 45. Lassen Juvenile Hall Population for 2002 through 20191

0

5

10

15

20

25

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 46. Population of Lassen Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 47. Lassen Juvenile Hall Felony Population as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 36. Los Angeles Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002 3,686 892 24% 2,794 76% 3,669 819 22% 2,850 78%2003 3,729 903 24% 2,826 76% 3,694 771 21% 2,923 79%2004 3,528 980 28% 2,548 72% 3,534 695 20% 2,839 80%2005 3,541 1,072 30% 2,469 70% 3,516 697 20% 2,819 80%2006 3,437 1,138 33% 2,299 67% 3,378 597 18% 2,781 82%2007 3,276 1,110 34% 2,166 66% 3,171 583 18% 2,589 82%2008 3,162 1,057 33% 2,105 67% 3,167 576 18% 2,591 82%2009 2,983 981 33% 2,006 67% 2,989 531 18% 2,458 82%2010 2,570 748 29% 1,822 71% 2,605 634 24% 1,972 76%2011 2,295 647 28% 1,648 72% 2,303 599 26% 1,705 74%2012 2,058 547 27% 1,511 73% 2,054 549 27% 1,505 73%2013 1,753 397 23% 1,356 77% 1,727 492 28% 1,235 72%2014 1,440 374 26% 1,067 74% 1,473 409 28% 1,064 72%2015 1,311 391 30% 920 70% 1,366 408 30% 958 70%2016 1,169 367 31% 802 69% 1,201 329 27% 872 73%2017 1,130 363 32% 767 68% 1,122 319 28% 803 72%2018 957 324 34% 632 66% 964 256 27% 708 73%2019 840 284 34% 556 66% 833 219 26% 614 74%Note. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY






Table 37. Los Angeles Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002 1,615 892 55% 722 45% 1,595 306 19% 1,289 81%2003 1,625 903 56% 722 44% 1,586 275 17% 1,311 83%2004 1,558 980 63% 578 37% 1,550 299 19% 1,251 81%2005 1,656 1,072 65% 584 35% 1,635 335 20% 1,301 80%2006 1,723 1,138 66% 585 34% 1,716 352 20% 1,364 80%2007 1,684 1,110 66% 574 34% 1,651 350 21% 1,301 79%2008 1,578 1,057 67% 522 33% 1,575 361 23% 1,215 77%2009 1,475 981 67% 494 33% 1,474 351 24% 1,122 76%2010 1,261 748 59% 513 41% 1,300 486 37% 814 63%2011 1,125 647 57% 478 43% 1,140 467 41% 673 59%2012 980 547 56% 433 44% 988 416 42% 572 58%2013 897 397 44% 501 56% 894 384 43% 510 57%2014 802 374 47% 429 53% 795 344 43% 451 57%2015 735 391 53% 344 47% 748 338 45% 410 55%2016 657 367 56% 290 44% 662 288 43% 375 57%2017 703 363 52% 340 48% 701 274 39% 427 61%2018 638 324 51% 314 49% 645 238 37% 406 63%2019 568 284 50% 284 50% 559 207 37% 352 63%Note. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.






Table 38. Los Angeles Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20191

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002 2,072 100% 2,074 514 25% 1,561 75%2003 2,103 100% 2,108 496 24% 1,612 76%2004 1,970 100% 1,984 396 20% 1,589 80%2005 1,885 100% 1,881 362 19% 1,519 81%2006 1,715 100% 1,662 245 15% 1,417 85%2007 1,592 100% 1,520 232 15% 1,288 85%2008 1,583 100% 1,592 216 14% 1,376 86%2009 1,512 100% 1,515 180 12% 1,336 88%2010 1,309 100% 1,306 148 11% 1,158 89%2011 1,170 100% 1,163 132 11% 1,032 89%2012 1,078 100% 1,066 133 12% 933 88%2013 856 100% 834 108 13% 726 87%2014 638 100% 678 66 10% 613 90%2015 576 100% 618 70 11% 548 89%2016 512 100% 539 42 8% 497 92%2017 427 100% 421 45 11% 377 89%2018 319 100% 319 18 6% 301 94%2019 272 100% 274 12 4% 262 96%Note. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.







Figure 48. Los Angeles ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for

2002 through 20191

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 49. Population of Los Angeles Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 50. Los Angeles Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

64%

66%

68%

70%

72%

74%

76%

78%

80%

82%

84%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 39. Madera Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


MADERA COUNTY






Table 40. Madera Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191







Table 41. Madera Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20191








Figure 51. Madera ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 52. Population of Madera Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 53. Madera Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 42. Marin Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


MARIN COUNTY






Figure 54. Marin Juvenile Hall Population for 2002 through 20191

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 55. Population of Marin Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002 through

20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 56. Marin Juvenile Hall Felony Population as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 43. Mendocino Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


MENDOCINO COUNTY






Figure 57. Mendocino Juvenile Hall Population for 2002 through 20191

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 58. Population of Mendocino Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 59. Mendocino Juvenile Hall Felony Population as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 44. Merced Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


MERCED COUNTY






Table 45. Merced Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191







Table 46. Merced Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 20062 through 2019

1

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP20022003200420052006 37 100% 35 11 33% 24 67%2007 53 100% 45 19 43% 26 57%2008 53 100% 51 15 29% 37 71%2009 57 100% 54 10 18% 44 82%2010 57 100% 58 17 29% 41 71%2011 47 100% 38 9 23% 29 77%2012 41 100% 29 3 12% 25 88%2013 29 100% 20 3 17% 16 83%2014 26 100% 17 2 14% 14 86%2015 24 100% 17 3 16% 14 84%2016 25 100% 13 2 13% 12 87%2017 26 100% 15 2 17% 12 83%2018 23 100% 16 2 11% 14 89%2019 21 100% 21 0 2% 21 98%Note. 2 2006 Average Daily Population based on February - December. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.



Merced County's Camp opened February 2006.





Figure 60. Merced ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 61. Population of Merced Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 62. Merced Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 47. Monterey Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


MONTEREY COUNTY






Table 48. Monterey Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191







Table 49. Monterey Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20191








Figure 63. Monterey ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 64. Population of Monterey Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 65. Monterey Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 50. Napa Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


NAPA COUNTY






Figure 66. Napa ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 67. Population of Napa Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002 through

20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 68. Napa Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 51. Nevada Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


NEVADA COUNTY






Figure 69. Nevada Juvenile Hall Population for 2002 through 20191

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 70. Population of Nevada Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 71. Nevada Juvenile Hall Felony Population as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 52. Orange Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


ORANGE COUNTY






Table 53. Orange Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191







Table 54. Orange Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20191








Figure 72. Orange ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 73. Population of Orange Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 74. Orange Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 55. Placer Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


PLACER COUNTY






Figure 75. Placer Juvenile Hall Population for 2002 through 20191

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 76. Population of Placer Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002 through

20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 77. Placer Juvenile Hall Felony Population as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 56. Riverside Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


RIVERSIDE COUNTY






Table 57. Riverside Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191







Table 58. Riverside Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20191








Figure 78. Riverside ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 79. Population of Riverside Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 80. Riverside Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 59. Sacramento Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


SACRAMENTO COUNTY






Table 60. Sacramento Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191







Table 61. Sacramento Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20102

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002 205 100% 197 125 63% 72 37%2003 170 100% 170 106 62% 64 38%2004 157 100% 157 82 52% 75 48%2005 167 100% 167 99 59% 68 41%2006 203 100% 204 108 53% 96 47%2007 216 100% 215 114 53% 101 47%2008 207 100% 208 113 54% 95 46%2009 130 100% 129 60 47% 69 53%2010 73 100% 76 40 53% 36 47%201120122013201420152016201720182019Note. 2 2010 Average Daily Population based on January - June. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.



Sacramento County's Camp closed June 2010.





Figure 81. Sacramento ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 82. Population of Sacramento Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 83. Sacramento Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 62. San Benito Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


SAN BENITO COUNTY






Figure 84. San Benito ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

5

10

15

20

25

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 85. Population of San Benito Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 86. San Benito Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 63. San Bernardino Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY






Table 64. San Bernardino Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191







Table 65. San Bernardino Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20192








Figure 87. San Bernardino ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for

2002 through 20191

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 88. Population of San Bernardino Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for

2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 89. San Bernardino Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through

20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 66. San Diego Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


SAN DIEGO COUNTY






Table 67. San Diego Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191







Table 68. San Diego Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20192








Figure 90. San Diego ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 91. Population of San Diego Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 92. San Diego Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 69. San Francisco Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY







Table 70. San Francisco Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191








Table 71. San Francisco Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20192

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002 23 100% 21 8 36% 14 64%2003 24 100% 23 7 29% 17 71%2004 15 100% 16 7 41% 9 59%2005 16 100% 16 7 41% 9 59%2006 25 100% 25 9 36% 16 64%2007 29 100% 27 7 27% 20 73%2008 16 100% 15 3 18% 13 82%2009 14 100% 14 2 12% 12 88%2010 14 100% 14 3 23% 11 77%2011 21 100% 21 9 43% 12 57%2012 18 100% 17 7 42% 10 58%2013 14 100% 14 5 33% 10 67%2014 17 100% 17 6 37% 11 63%2015 12 100% 12 4 33% 8 67%2016 13 100% 12 8 63% 5 37%2017 12 100% 12 8 64% 4 36%2018 5 100% 5 2 42% 3 58%2019 0 100% 0 0 n/a 0 n/a








Figure 93. San Francisco ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for

2002 through 20191

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 94. Population of San Francisco Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 95. San Francisco Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through

20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 72. San Joaquin Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY







Table 73. San Joaquin Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191








Table 74. San Joaquin Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20192

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002 38 100% 38 6 16% 32 84%2003 42 100% 42 6 15% 36 85%2004 43 100% 43 7 17% 35 83%2005 39 100% 38 11 30% 27 70%2006 37 100% 38 3 8% 35 92%2007 35 100% 36 4 11% 33 89%2008 37 100% 37 11 31% 26 69%2009 37 100% 39 1 2% 39 98%2010 35 100% 36 0 0% 36 100%2011 36 100% 36 0 0% 36 100%2012 28 100% 28 1 5% 27 95%2013 25 100% 27 0 0% 27 100%2014 26 100% 27 0 0% 27 100%2015 22 100% 24 1 4% 23 96%2016 20 100% 22 0 0% 22 100%2017 23 100% 24 0 0% 24 100%2018 21 100% 21 0 0% 21 100%2019 27 100% 28 0 0% 28 100%








Figure 96. San Joaquin ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for

2002 through 20191

0

50

100

150

200

250

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 97. Population of San Joaquin Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 98. San Joaquin Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 75. San Luis Obispo Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY







Table 76. San Luis Obispo Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191








Table 77. San Luis Obispo Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 20172 through 2019

1

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017 6 100% 7 5 78% 1 22%2018 6 100% 6 4 57% 3 43%2019 4 100% 4 1 27% 3 73%




San Luis Obispo County's Camp opened June 2017.





Figure 99. San Luis Obispo ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for

2002 through 20191

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 100. Population of San Luis Obispo Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for

2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 101. San Luis Obispo Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through

20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 78. San Mateo Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


SAN MATEO COUNTY







Table 79. San Mateo Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191








Table 80. San Mateo Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20192









Figure 102. San Mateo ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

50

100

150

200

250

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 103. Population of San Mateo Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 104. San Mateo Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 81. Santa Barbara Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


SANTA BARBARA COUNTY







Table 82. Santa Barbara Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191




Note. Santa Barbara's Juvenile Hall converted to a Special Purpose Juvenile Hall in October 2011. A Special Purpose Juvenile Hall is a county facility used for temporary confinement of youth, not to exceed 96 hours, prior to transfer to a full service juvenile facility or release. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.




Table 83. Santa Barbara Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20192









Figure 105. Santa Barbara ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for

2002 through 20191

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 106. Population of Santa Barbara Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for

2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 107. Santa Barbara Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through

20191

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 84. Santa Clara Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


SANTA CLARA COUNTY







Table 85. Santa Clara Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191








Table 86. Santa Clara Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20192









Figure 108. Santa Clara ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for

2002 through 20191

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 109. Population of Santa Clara Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 110. Santa Clara Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through

20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 87. Santa Cruz Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


SANTA CRUZ COUNTY







Figure 111. Santa Cruz Juvenile Hall Population for 2002 through 20191

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 112. Population of Santa Cruz Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 113. Santa Cruz Juvenile Hall Felony Population as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 88. Shasta Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


SHASTA COUNTY







Table 89. Shasta Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191








Table 90. Shasta Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20102

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002 49 100% 49 26 52% 24 48%2003 46 100% 47 31 65% 16 35%2004 41 100% 43 26 61% 17 39%2005 41 100% 42 24 58% 18 42%2006 42 100% 43 24 57% 18 43%2007 41 100% 42 22 52% 20 48%2008 31 100% 33 18 53% 16 47%2009 18 100% 21 11 52% 10 48%2010 0 n/a 0 0 n/a 0 n/a201120122013201420152016201720182019




Shasta County's Camp closed July 2010.





Figure 114. Shasta ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 115. Population of Shasta Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 116. Shasta Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 91. Siskiyou Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002 14 7 51% 7 49% 14 5 38% 9 62%2003 17 8 45% 10 55% 17 10 60% 7 40%2004 15 6 38% 9 62% 15 4 30% 10 70%2005 14 6 42% 8 58% 13 4 29% 9 71%2006 15 8 51% 7 49% 14 4 28% 10 72%2007 15 10 62% 6 38% 15 5 37% 9 63%2008 18 7 37% 11 63% 17 8 44% 10 56%2009 14 6 45% 8 55% 11 5 42% 7 58%2010 14 5 34% 9 66% 15 4 29% 10 71%2011 14 7 48% 7 52% 15 6 37% 9 63%2012 15 7 48% 8 52% 14 4 25% 11 75%2013 9 4 50% 4 50% 8 3 37% 5 63%2014 12 5 39% 7 61% 12 3 25% 9 75%2015 12 4 36% 8 64% 12 2 13% 11 87%2016 10 4 44% 5 56% 10 0 4% 9 96%2017 8 4 53% 4 47% 8 1 14% 7 86%2018 0 0 n/a 0 n/a 0 0 n/a 0 n/a2019 0 0 n/a 0 n/a 0 0 n/a 0 n/a

SISKIYOU COUNTY



Note. Siskiyou's Juvenile Hall converted to a Special Purpose Juvenile Hall in February 2018. A Special Purpose Juvenile Hall is a county facility used for temporary confinement of youth, not to exceed 96 hours, prior to transfer to a full service juvenile facility or release. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.




Figure 117. Siskiyou Juvenile Hall Population for 2002 through 20191

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 118. Population of Siskiyou Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 119. Siskiyou Juvenile Hall Felony Population as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 92. Solano Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


SOLANO COUNTY







Table 93. Solano Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191








Table 94. Solano Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20192









Figure 120. Solano ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 121. Population of Solano Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 122. Solano Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 95. Sonoma Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


SONOMA COUNTY







Table 96. Sonoma Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191








Table 97. Sonoma Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20192









Figure 123. Sonoma ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 124. Population of Sonoma Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 125. Sonoma Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 98. Stanislaus Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


STANISLAUS COUNTY







Table 99. Stanislaus Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191








Table 100. Stanislaus Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 20132 through 2019

1

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013 37 100% 35 8 23% 27 77%2014 33 100% 33 6 17% 28 83%2015 24 100% 24 7 30% 17 70%2016 28 100% 27 5 17% 22 83%2017 22 100% 22 6 27% 16 73%2018 21 100% 21 6 30% 15 70%2019 26 100% 26 8 30% 18 70%



Note. 2 2013 Average Daily Population based on June - December. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.

Stanislaus County's Camp opened June 2013.





Figure 126. Stanislaus ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 127. Population of Stanislaus Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 128. Stanislaus Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 101. Tehama Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


TEHAMA COUNTY






Figure 129. Tehama Juvenile Hall Population for 2002 through 20191

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 130. Population of Tehama Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 131. Tehama Juvenile Hall Felony Population as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 102. Trinity Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


TRINITY COUNTY






Table 103. Trinity Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002 11 3 30% 8 70% 11 6 50% 6 50%2003 7 3 41% 4 59% 7 4 53% 3 47%2004 8 2 24% 6 76% 8 6 79% 2 21%2005 10 5 46% 6 54% 10 7 63% 4 37%2006 12 6 52% 6 48% 12 9 74% 3 26%2007 10 6 54% 5 46% 11 7 68% 4 32%2008 10 5 46% 6 54% 9 6 67% 3 33%2009 6 2 43% 3 57% 7 5 69% 2 31%2010 8 4 47% 4 53% 7 5 66% 2 34%2011 3 2 59% 1 41% 3 2 73% 1 27%2012 4 3 68% 1 32% 4 3 67% 1 33%2013 3 3 89% 0 11% 3 2 76% 1 24%2014 1 1 87% 0 13% 1 1 53% 1 47%2015 2 0 10% 2 94% 1 1 88% 0 13%2016 3 0 10% 2 84% 1 1 35% 1 65%2017 2 0 3% 2 98% 1 0 14% 1 86%2018 2 0 0% 2 90% 1 1 53% 1 47%2019 2 0 0% 1 87% 1 1 100% 0 0%Note. Trinity's Juvenile Hall converted to a Special Purpose Juvenile Hall in August 2014. A Special Purpose Juvenile Hall is a county facility used for temporary confinement of youth, not to exceed 96 hours, prior to transfer to a full service juvenile facility or release. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.






Table 104. Trinity Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 20062

through 20143

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP20022003200420052006 6 100% 6 3 46% 3 54%2007 6 100% 6 4 74% 2 26%2008 5 100% 5 3 68% 2 32%2009 5 100% 5 4 69% 2 31%2010 6 100% 6 3 48% 3 52%2011 4 100% 4 4 79% 1 21%2012 5 100% 5 4 75% 1 25%2013 3 100% 3 2 61% 1 39%2014 3 100% 3 1 29% 2 71%20152016201720182019Note. 2 2006 Average Daily Population based on September - December. 3 2014 Average Daily Population based on January - July. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.



Trinity County's Camp closed August 2014.

Trinity County's Camp opened September 2006.





Figure 132. Trinity ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 133. Population of Trinity Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 134. Trinity Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 105. Tulare Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


TULARE COUNTY






Table 106. Tulare Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191







Table 107. Tulare Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20191








Figure 135. Tulare ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

50

100

150

200

250

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 136. Population of Tulare Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 137. Tulare Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 108. Tuolumne Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 20172 through 2019

1

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017 5 3 52% 2 47% 6 4 60% 2 40%2018 8 7 81% 2 19% 9 8 94% 1 6%2019 9 4 39% 6 61% 9 3 35% 6 65%Note. 2 2017 Average Daily Population based on April - December. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.

TUOLUMNE COUNTY



Tuolumne County's Juvenile Hall opened April 2017.




Figure 138. Tuolumne Juvenile Hall Population for 2002 through 20191

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 139. Population of Tuolumne Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 140. Tuolumne Juvenile Hall Felony Population as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 109. Ventura Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


VENTURA COUNTY






Table 110. Ventura Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191







Table 111. Ventura Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20191








Figure 141. Ventura ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

50

100

150

200

250

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 142. Population of Ventura Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002

through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 143. Ventura Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 112. Yolo Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


YOLO COUNTY






Figure 144. Yolo Juvenile Hall Population for 2002 through 20191

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 145. Population of Yolo Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002 through

20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 146. Yolo Juvenile Hall Felony Population as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony




Table 113. Yuba Combined Juvenile Facilities Population Trends for 2002 through 20191


YUBA COUNTY






Table 114. Yuba2 Juvenile Hall Population Trends for 2002 through 2019

1

Year ADP ADP % of ADP ADP % of ADP AMP % of AMP AMP % of AMP2002 46 24 53% 21 47% 45 20 44% 25 56%2003 45 26 57% 19 43% 44 15 34% 29 66%2004 37 23 62% 14 38% 37 10 27% 27 73%2005 35 22 61% 14 39% 37 11 31% 25 69%2006 29 18 62% 11 38% 30 11 36% 19 64%2007 29 17 60% 12 40% 29 10 35% 19 65%2008 39 25 64% 14 36% 40 14 35% 26 65%2009 35 21 60% 14 40% 35 10 28% 25 72%2010 30 17 57% 13 43% 30 9 29% 22 71%2011 25 15 61% 10 39% 26 11 43% 15 57%2012 25 15 60% 10 39% 24 11 45% 13 55%2013 30 18 61% 12 39% 30 13 43% 17 57%2014 26 16 62% 10 38% 25 13 52% 12 48%2015 32 24 76% 8 24% 32 13 41% 19 59%2016 23 18 76% 5 23% 23 8 33% 15 67%2017 24 18 76% 6 24% 24 8 33% 16 67%2018 23 16 69% 7 31% 22 5 22% 17 78%2019 16 10 62% 6 39% 14 4 26% 11 74%Note. 2 Yuba County & Sutter County share a regional Juvenile Hall. The Juvenile Hall is located in Yuba County. Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by taking a count of the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours each day of the month, adding these daily counts together, and dividing the sum by the number of days in each month. A one-day snapshot is the number of juveniles in custody at 0600 hours on the 15th day of the month. For the misdemeanor and felony populations the one-day snapshot each month provides an estimate of the monthly population and is used to estimate the average monthly population (AMP) for the year.






Table 115. Yuba Juvenile Camp/Ranch Population Trends for 2002 through 20191








Figure 147. Yuba ADP of Combined Juvenile Facilities and ADP by Facility Type (Juvenile Hall, Camp/Ranch) for 2002

through 20191

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

op

ula

tio

n (

AD

P)





Figure 148. Population of Yuba Juvenile Halls by Pre-Disposition and Post-Disposition as a Percent of ADP for 2002 through

20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

DP

)





Figure 149. Yuba Felony Population for the Combined Juvenile Facilities as a Percent of AMP for 2002 through 20191

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Per

cen

t o

f A

vera

ge M

on

thly

Po

pu

lati

on

(A

MP

)

Felony


juvenile detention profile trends - home - bscc · juvenile detention profile survey. county adp %...

Documents