justice reform

26
Justice Reform The judicial perspective

Upload: eydie

Post on 06-Jan-2016

40 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Justice Reform. The judicial perspective. Topics. Common ground Managing change Budgets Four lessons Surprises. Netherlands:. Leeuwarden. Groningen. Alkmaar. Amsterdam. Assen. Haarlem. Zwolle. Utrecht. Almelo. ‘s-Gravenhage. Zutphen. Dordrecht. Rotterdam. Arnhem. Middelburg. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Justice Reform

Justice Reform

The judicial perspective

Page 2: Justice Reform

Topics

• Common ground

• Managing change

• Budgets

• Four lessons

• Surprises

Page 3: Justice Reform

Supreme Court

19 District Courts

5 Appeal Courts

Central AppealsCouncil

Netherlands:  

Zwolle

Almelo

Zutphen

Groningen

Assen

Alkmaar

Haarlem

Utrecht

Rotterdam

Dordrecht

Middelburg

Maastricht

RoermondBreda

‘s-Gravenhage

Arnhem

Leeuwarden

Amsterdam

‘s-Hertogenbosch

62 local courts!Council of State

Page 4: Justice Reform

Staff

• 2200 judges

• 1177 men 1023 women

• 5839 court staff

• 461 staff in national services

•Source: Judicial Council Annual Report 2004

Page 5: Justice Reform

Rotterdam Criminal Court

Page 6: Justice Reform

Amsterdam Police Court

Page 7: Justice Reform

• University law degree• Judicial training – 6 years in

house and courses• 1987 Judge district court • 1993 local court Amsterdam• 1998 Program manager for IT

policy• Civil chamber, Court of Appeals

My Legal Career as Example

Page 8: Justice Reform

What do we agree on?

Reasons:

• Growing caseload

• Development in technology

• Increasing political interest

• International developments

• Outcomes: Council, budget

Page 9: Justice Reform

0

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

1200000

1400000

1600000

1800000

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

filed disposed

Cases filed and disposed

Page 10: Justice Reform

Other Issues

• Governance

• Change management

• Transparency

• Case handling

• External relations

Page 11: Justice Reform

Governance old Model

Judges

Minister of JusticePresidents’ Assembly

Court Staff

Court Director Court President

Page 12: Justice Reform

Court Improvement Program

• Case handling

• Court management

• Governance

• External relations

Page 13: Justice Reform

Improving Courts: Methodology

1 Program20 Project

teamsJudiciary ledMulti

disciplinary

Page 14: Justice Reform

Improving Courts: philosophy

• Cooperation

• Support

• Knowledge based

• Not bureaucratic

Page 15: Justice Reform

Improving Courts: Results

LegislationGovernanceWeb kioskQuality systemRaised awareness

Page 16: Justice Reform

Improving Courts: Outcomes

Court Management

Judicial Councilwww.rechtspraak.

nlQuality systemCritical mass of

change managers

Page 17: Justice Reform

Court management and budgets

• More than 20 years of discussion

• Judiciary: No independence without budget

• Judicial council budgeting authority

• Courts get budget based on number of cases disposed

Page 18: Justice Reform

Integral Management

Judges and Court Staff

Court Board

President, Sector Presidents, Court Director

Minister of Justice(Presidents’ Assembly)

Council for the Judiciary

Page 19: Justice Reform

Court Budgeting

• Open system: cases filed uncertain

• Budget based on cases disposed x price

• Case price based on standards

• Undefended small claim: € 15

• Estimated number disposed before

• Actual number disposed - recalculation

Page 20: Justice Reform

Meet the Judicial Council

•5 - full time •3 judges•2 non judiciary•6 year term•renewable

Page 21: Justice Reform

• Mission: Improving societal quality of judicial organization• Policy • External relations• Budget• Advisory• Change management

Meet the Judicial Council

Page 22: Justice Reform

Civil

Aligning Reform in Coherent Programs

Criminal Admin

IT Program

Legislative advice

Page 23: Justice Reform

Lesson: Money Counts

• Need for good statistics

• Keep checking

• 1992-2002

• Good for transparency

• And for productivity

• But quality control is needed!!!

Page 24: Justice Reform

Lesson: Quality Matters

Measuring judicial quality

Different instruments

• Statistics

• Surveys

• Auditing

Page 25: Justice Reform

Lesson: Strange Effects

4 examples• Government commitment • Local courts• IT as catalyst for change • Everybody wants

computers

Page 26: Justice Reform

• Agendas • Allies• Changing minds• Critical mass• Ownership

Lesson: People Matter Most