journal reading - preoperative lymp node

Upload: rambopratama

Post on 07-Aug-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/20/2019 journal reading - preoperative lymp node

    1/19

    Widya Sakti Pratama

  • 8/20/2019 journal reading - preoperative lymp node

    2/19

    Background

    • Approximately 2.7% to 10% ofpatients it! "## !a$e lymp! nodemetastasis

    • mpro$ed sur$i$al in patients it! "##!o underent "P&'(

    • Patients it! only nodal metastasis

    !o undergo a &' dissection atnep!rectomy may !a$e dura)ledisease*free sur$i$al

  • 8/20/2019 journal reading - preoperative lymp node

    3/19

    +aterial and +et!od

    • "etrospecti$ely data)ase for patients it!"## it!out distant metastasis !ounderent radical or partial nep!rectomy

    it! ,p-any p'0*1 +0 and it!out ,p-anyp'x +0 "P&'( )eteen 1// and 2012

    • Symptom c!aracteriation as recordedas local or systemic

    •  A nomogram as de$eloped to predictt!e pro)a)ility of lymp! node metastasis

  • 8/20/2019 journal reading - preoperative lymp node

    4/19

  • 8/20/2019 journal reading - preoperative lymp node

    5/19

    +aterial and +et!od

    • systemic systems o fe$er3

    o nig!t seats

    o 4atigue

    o eig!t loss greater t!an 10 pounds

    • &ocal Symptomso 4lank paino5ematuria respiratory or gastrointestinal

    complain

  • 8/20/2019 journal reading - preoperative lymp node

    6/19

    • #linically positi$e &'s ,c'1 ere

    de6ned as retroperitoneallymp!adenopat!y greater t!an 1 cm oncross sectional imaging or enlarged &'sat surgery

    • radiograp!ic information

     – -umor

     – &' sie

     – -umor necrosis

     – -!rom)us

     – location

  • 8/20/2019 journal reading - preoperative lymp node

    7/19

     Statistical Analysis

    • Analysis in patients !o underent"P&'( to determine signi6cantco$ariates )eteen t!ose it! p'1

    and p'0

    • A nomogram as de$eloped topredict t!e pro)a)ility of &'

    metastasis in patients !ounderent "P&'(

  • 8/20/2019 journal reading - preoperative lymp node

    8/19

     Statistical Analysis

    • utcome measures – $erall Sur$i$al

     – #ancer Speci6c Sur$i$al

     –

    "ecurrence 4ree Sur$i$al• $erall Sur$i$al and #ancer Speci6c Sur$i$al

    calculated in mont!s from t!e date ofsurgery to t!e date of last follo up or deat!

    • "ecurrence free sur$i$al calculated inmont!s from t!e date of surgery to t!e dateof local and8or distant recurrence

  • 8/20/2019 journal reading - preoperative lymp node

    9/19

  • 8/20/2019 journal reading - preoperative lymp node

    10/19

    "9S:&-

    • We identi6ed 13270 patients it!renal cell carcinoma it!out distantmetastasis !o !ad ,;

  • 8/20/2019 journal reading - preoperative lymp node

    11/19

    • ;

  • 8/20/2019 journal reading - preoperative lymp node

    12/19

  • 8/20/2019 journal reading - preoperative lymp node

    13/19

    (iscussion

    • Patients it! "## it!out distantmetastasis !o ere selected for"P&'( local symptoms3 9#? PS 1

    or greater3 c'1 stage and increased&(5 ere independent predictors of&' metastasis

  • 8/20/2019 journal reading - preoperative lymp node

    14/19

    • Patients it! clinically negati$e )utpat!ologically positi$e &'s ,c'0p'1!ad )etter S3 #SS and "4S t!an

    patients it! clinically andpat!ologically positi$e &'s ,c'1p'1.

  • 8/20/2019 journal reading - preoperative lymp node

    15/19

  • 8/20/2019 journal reading - preoperative lymp node

    16/19

  • 8/20/2019 journal reading - preoperative lymp node

    17/19

  • 8/20/2019 journal reading - preoperative lymp node

    18/19

    #onclusions

    • &ocal symptoms3 9#? PS3 c' stageand lactate de!ydrogenase ereindependent predictors of lymp! node

    metastasis in patients !o underentretroperitoneal lymp! node dissection

    • Predicti$e nomogram !ad >/%

    discrimination and performed ellit! internal $alidation

  • 8/20/2019 journal reading - preoperative lymp node

    19/19

    #onclusions

    • Patients it! clinically negati$e )utpat!ologically positi$e &'s representa small su)set of t!ose it! "## ,7%

    in t!is co!ort

    •  -!e incidence of clinically positi$e)ut pat!ologically negati$e &'s

    ,7% is not insigni6cant