john p berdahl m.d.* david r. hardten m.d. , f.a.c.s.*

7
Topographic and Axial Length Changes after Descemet’s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty: The effect on refractive error John P Berdahl M.D.* David R. Hardten M.D. , F.A.C.S.* *No relevant financial disclosures

Upload: jaclyn

Post on 19-Jan-2016

50 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Topographic and Axial Length Changes after Descemet’s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty:  The effect on refractive error. John P Berdahl M.D.* David R. Hardten M.D. , F.A.C.S.*. *No relevant financial disclosures. Background. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: John P Berdahl M.D.*  David R. Hardten M.D. , F.A.C.S.*

Topographic and Axial Length Changes after Descemet’s Stripping Endothelial

Keratoplasty: The effect on refractive error

John P Berdahl M.D.* David R. Hardten M.D. , F.A.C.S.*

*No relevant financial disclosures

Page 2: John P Berdahl M.D.*  David R. Hardten M.D. , F.A.C.S.*

BackgroundDescemet’s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSEK)

is known to cause a hyperopic shift.

The hyperopic shift has been attributed to the divergent refractive property of the DSEK lenticule itself.

Other factors such as keratometry and axial length could also contribute.

PurposeTo evaluate if keratometry changes are caused

by DSEK and if changes correlate with induced refractive error

Page 3: John P Berdahl M.D.*  David R. Hardten M.D. , F.A.C.S.*

Methods

Comparison to contralateral eye

Keratomety (Manual or Topo) Pachymetry Axial length (if present)

Comparisons

Comparison of DSEK eye (pre and post-op)

Change in Keratomety Change in Pachymetry Change in Visual acuity Change in refraction from

prediction*

*Predicted post-op refraction was based on IOL calculations in patients with combined cataract surgery. *Predicted post-op refraction was identical to pre-op refraction in patients undergoing DSEK only

Page 4: John P Berdahl M.D.*  David R. Hardten M.D. , F.A.C.S.*

ResultsAverage age - 6010 Males, 10 FemalesAverage f/u time 287 daysNo significant change in axial length (only

measured in 2 patients)No significant difference in pre-op or post-

op Keratometry was observed when comparing DSEK eye to contralateral eye.

Page 5: John P Berdahl M.D.*  David R. Hardten M.D. , F.A.C.S.*

Results

-4 -2 0 2 4

-4

-2

0

2

4

f(x) = − 0.104403156653 x + 1.314613221897R² = 0.00849598707103993

Average K

Change in Keratomery (D)

Chan

ge in

refr

actio

n fr

om p

redi

cted

(D)

No correlation between change in K’s from DSEK and change from predicted refraction

steeperflatter

Average change from predicted refractive error was 1.3D more hyperopic

Average keratometry flattens by -0.52D (p<0.05)

0 5 10 15 2038.0

40.0

42.0

44.0

46.0

Comparison of Pre- and Post-op Keratometry in

Individuals

Pre-op KPost-op K

Patient Number

Avera

ge K

(D

)

Series140

41

42

43

44

45

43.3342.81

Pre and Post Operative Average Keratometry

Avera

ge K

(D

)

Pre-op

Post-op

Page 6: John P Berdahl M.D.*  David R. Hardten M.D. , F.A.C.S.*

SummaryA hyperopic shift of 1.3D is created by DSEKAverage K’s flatten by 0.5D after DSEK (p<0.5)Flattening of keratometry was not statistically

significantly correlated with the amount of induced hyperopia. However, a trend was observed since most eyes become flatter and more hyperopic.

Pre-opAverage K 43.5D

POM #4Average K 42.12D

POM #11Average K 42.31D

Page 7: John P Berdahl M.D.*  David R. Hardten M.D. , F.A.C.S.*

ConclusionsCorneal flattening may contribute the

hyperopic shift commonly observed after DSEK.