7/29/2019 J&K Police Bill-own Homegrown AFSPA

1/2

Resist This Draconian Bill ! Down With J&Ks Own

Homegrown AFSPA! !

More powers in special zones: J&K police Bill has AFSPA ring

Muzamil Jaleel, Indian Express, Posted online: Sun Feb 24 2013, 02:24 hrs

Srinagar : While Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah frequently speaks

out against the Armed Forces Special Powers Act in force in the state, as per a Bill

drafted by his own government, the state police could get powers quite similar to the

controversial legislation.

The 76-page Jammu and Kashmir Police Bill, 2013, made public recently, allowsthe state to declare any area disturbed, proposing setting up Special Security

Zones where administrative and development measures are integrated with police

response for problems of public order and security.Negating the role of civil administration like a district magistrate in affairs of law and

order, the Bill proposes that police be able to set up and arm controversial militia

of civilians as villagedefence committees and recruit special police officers

outside the existing police structure. It also plans a stringent confidentiality

clause that could override the existing Right to Information Act in the state.

The Bill was posted on the home departments website on February 15, while

Kashmir was under curfew following Afzal Gurus hanging, with a notification inviting

suggestions for the next two weeks.

Under the draft legislation, a police officer would be considered always on duty

and the government as well as the complaints authority deputed to hear casesagainst him/her would have legal immunity regarding decisions taken by them

in good faith or intended to be done in pursuance of the provisions of the Bill. In

fact, the good faith clause also the main basis of immunity under the AFSPA in the draft legislation is vague, doesnt spell out whether the police force itself

falls under government and is thus open to wider interpretation.

There is also a six-month deadline on entertaining a complaint made against a police

official from the occurrence of the incident.

While the civil administration sees the Bill as a bid to encroach on its powers, activists

see it as an attempt to exert control. The draft police Bill essentially reads as a

blueprint on how to exercise control on the populace, said noted human rights lawyerParvez Imroz. Within these (Special Security) zones, the attempt is to allow thepolice and its functionaries, the SPOs, absolute and unaccountable power. It

allows for a different Standard Operating Procedure within these zones, without

specifying the limits to these powers.

Imroz also questioned the expansion of the role of SPOs and village defence committees.

The government is seeking to formalise practices that have resulted in structural policeviolence in Jammu and Kashmir, he said.

Senior J&K High Court lawyer Riyaz Khawar accused the government of trying to make a

police state. They are taking away magisterial powers and giving it to the police,

Khawar said. So even if the AFSPA is repealed, they would have already brought it backvia this police Act.

7/29/2019 J&K Police Bill-own Homegrown AFSPA

2/2

Minister of State for Home Sajad Kichloo claimed that most of the features in the draft

Bill are based on a model Bill prepared by a committee of eminent experts constituted

by the government of India and on the directions of the Supreme Court. They would

consider the suggestions received on it, he added.

Some of the proposals:

Any person cleaning a furniture or vehicle, slaughtering an animal, cleaning acarcass or grooming an animal in a public place would invite punishment. So

would those trespassing into a government building or land, and those driving,

dragging or pushing any non-motorised vehicle at any time between half an hour

after sunset and one hour before sunrise. Knowingly defecating or urinating in a

public place with a view to cause annoyance, breaking any queue in any publicplace and other similar violations of public order are also frowned upon. Such

offences would invite imprisonmentup to six months or fine up to Rs 2,000.

The director general of police would draw up an Internal Security Scheme forthe entire state and formulate an SOP. Under it, even lawful activity by a group or

organisation that has the potential of disturbing law and order would needprior police permission.

The state government may declare any area a Special Security Zone (SSZ), whensuch area is widely and intolerably beset with violence or insurgency or

destruction of public property on account of communal or terrorist or anti-

national activities. These SSZs would have a suitable administrative structure,

which shall integrate administrative and developmental measures in the area

with the police response to deal with problems of public order and security.

Any inflow of funds as well as production, sale, storage, possession or entry ofany devices or equipment into SSZs be banned if these are reasonably

considered a threat to internal security or public order in any manner. There must be a State Security Commission (SSC) with the CM as its chairman,

the home minister or minister of state for home as its vice-chairman, a retired

high court judge as its member, and the DGP, the chief secretary and the home

secretary as ex-officio members (Activists have pointed out that there are no

members from the Opposition in the proposed commission).

A Police Complaints Authority, at the state and district levels, be set up to lookinto grievances against police officials.