jiayi lu1,2, matthew walenski2,3, and cynthia k. thompson2 ... · jiayi lu1,2, matthew walenski2,3,...

1
Jiayi Lu 1,2 , Matthew Walenski 2,3 , and Cynthia K. Thompson 2, 3, 4 1 Department of Linguistics, Northwestern University 2 Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University 3 Center for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery, Northwestern University 4 Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Introduction Subject and Object Relative Clause in Chinese: Mixed results: increased processing costs for either subject- relative clauses or object-relative clause; (Hsiao & Gibson, 2003; Jäger, Chen, Li, Lin, & Vasishth, 2015; Lin & Bever, 2006) Expectations for non-RC structures may play a role: Method Research Questions Which one of the relative clauses is easier to process? Do structural expectations influence processing of Chinese relative clauses? At what point are expectations for relative clause structures constructed? Participants: Twenty native Chinese speakers: 5 males, 15 females, age: 19.75, SD: 3.076, range: 18-32 Materials: Condition Example Test Stimuli Subject relative clause 小明说:追猫的 大黑狗确实胖胖的。 Xiaoming shuo: zhui mao de daheigou queshi pangpangde. Xiaoming say: chase cat REL big black dog indeed fat Xiaoming said: “The big black dog that chases the cat is fat indeed” Imperative (pro-drop) 明说,追猫去 吧。 Xiaoming shuozhui mao qu ba. Xiaoming say, chase cat QU BA Xiaoming said: “Let’s go chase the cat.” Object relative clause 明说,猫追的 大黑狗确实胖胖的。 Xiaoming shuo mao zhui de daheigou queshi pangpangde. Xiaoming say cat chase REL big black dog indeed fat Xiaoming said: “The big black dog that the little white cat chases is fat indeed.” SVO 明说,猫追了 大黑狗。 Xiaoming shuo, mao zhui le daheigou. Xiaoming say, cat chase ASP big black dog Xiaoming said: “the cat chased the big black dog.” Critical Regions: first words in relative clause, and relativizer (and equivalent); Procedure Results Conclusions Processing Cost: Subject-relative clauses are initially more difficult to process than object-relative clauses, though they incur a similar processing cost at the relative-clause marker. Structural Expectations: Verb-initial clause triggers early expectation for a subject-relative clause structure; Noun-initial clause does not trigger expectation for object-relative clause; Expectation for relative clause emerge at relative clause verb in subject-relative clauses, and at relativizer in object- relative clauses Imperative, despite its simpler structure, was not the preferred expectation at any point in subject-relative clauses. References Hsiao, F., & Gibson, E. (2003). Processing Relative Clauses in Chinese, 90(1), 3–27. Jäger, L., Chen, Z., Li, Q., Lin, C.-J. C., & Vasishth, S. (2015). The subject-relative advantage in Chinese: Evidence for expectation-based processing, 79– 80, 97–120. Lin, C. C., & Bever, T. G. (2006). Subject Preference in the Processing of Relative Clauses in Chinese (pp. 254–260). This work was supported by NIH R01 DC01948 (PI: Cynthia K. Thompson). The study resulting in this presentation was assisted by a grant from the Undergraduate Research Grant Program which is administered by Northwestern University's Office of the Provost. However, the conclusions, opinions, and other statements in this presentation are the author's and not necessarily those of the sponsoring institution. Contact Information: JiayiLu [email protected] Analysis Mixed effects regression Fixed effects of anterior/posterior, left/right, condition, group Random effect of participant Artifacts removed with ICA Epoch length: -100 to 2400 ms after onset of first word in relative clause (and corresponding positions) Voltage threshold (±75μv) epoch rejection

Upload: others

Post on 23-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Jiayi Lu1,2, Matthew Walenski2,3, and Cynthia K. Thompson2 ... · Jiayi Lu1,2, Matthew Walenski2,3, and Cynthia K. Thompson2, 3, 4 1Department of Linguistics, Northwestern University

Jiayi Lu1,2, Matthew Walenski2,3, and Cynthia K. Thompson2, 3, 4

1Department of Linguistics, Northwestern University 2Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University 3Center for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery, Northwestern University 4Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

Introduction

• Subject and Object Relative Clause in Chinese:

• Mixed results: increased processing costs for either subject-relative clauses or object-relative clause;(Hsiao & Gibson, 2003; Jäger, Chen, Li, Lin, & Vasishth, 2015; Lin & Bever, 2006)

• Expectations for non-RC structures may play a role:

Method

Research Questions

• Which one of the relative clauses is easier to process?

• Do structural expectations influence processing of Chineserelative clauses?

• At what point are expectations for relative clause structuresconstructed?

• Participants:Twenty native Chinese speakers: 5 males, 15 females, age: 19.75,SD: 3.076, range: 18-32• Materials:Condition Example Test Stimuli

Subject relative clause

小明说:追猫的大黑狗确实胖胖的。Xiaoming shuo: zhui mao de daheigou queshi pangpangde.

Xiaoming say: chase cat REL big black dog indeed fat

Xiaoming said: “The big black dog that chases the cat is fat indeed”

Imperative (pro-drop)

小明说,追猫去吧。Xiaoming shuo, zhui mao qu ba.Xiaoming say, chase cat QU BAXiaoming said: “Let’s go chase the cat.”

Object relative clause

小明说,猫追的大黑狗确实胖胖的。Xiaoming shuo mao zhui de daheigou queshi pangpangde.

Xiaoming say cat chase REL big black dog indeed fat

Xiaoming said: “The big black dog that the little white cat chases is fat indeed.”

SVO小明说,猫追了大黑狗。

Xiaoming shuo, mao zhui le daheigou.Xiaoming say, cat chase ASP big black dog Xiaoming said: “the cat chased the big black dog.”

• Critical Regions: first words in relative clause, and relativizer (and equivalent);

• Procedure

Results

Conclusions➢ Processing Cost:• Subject-relative clauses are initially more difficult to process than object-relative clauses, though they incur a similar

processing cost at the relative-clause marker.➢ Structural Expectations:• Verb-initial clause triggers early expectation for a subject-relative clause structure;• Noun-initial clause does not trigger expectation for object-relative clause;• Expectation for relative clause emerge at relative clause verb in subject-relative clauses, and at relativizer in object-

relative clauses• Imperative, despite its simpler structure, was not the preferred expectation at any point in subject-relative clauses.

ReferencesHsiao, F., & Gibson, E. (2003). Processing Relative Clauses in Chinese, 90(1), 3–27.Jäger, L., Chen, Z., Li, Q., Lin, C.-J. C., & Vasishth, S. (2015). The subject-relative advantage in Chinese: Evidence for expectation-based processing, 79–80, 97–120.Lin, C. C., & Bever, T. G. (2006). Subject Preference in the Processing of Relative Clauses in Chinese (pp. 254–260).

This work was supported by NIH R01 DC01948 (PI: Cynthia K. Thompson).The study resulting in this presentation was assisted by a grant from the Undergraduate Research Grant Program which is administered by Northwestern University's Office of the Provost. However, theconclusions, opinions, and other statements in this presentation are the author's and not necessarily those of the sponsoring institution.

Contact Information: [email protected]

AnalysisMixed effects regression

Fixed effects of anterior/posterior, left/right, condition, groupRandom effect of participant

Artifacts removed with ICAEpoch length: -100 to 2400 ms after onset of first word in relative

clause (and corresponding positions)

Voltage threshold (±75µv) epoch rejection