jeremy dazzo chris hunter clint nesmith amy offill richie robinson chris stanfield
DESCRIPTION
Data Integrity Professionals. Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield Victoria Thomason. Entity Relationship Model. Logical Database Design. Familiarity with Business Processes (High) Team (Moderate) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813c28550346895da5a32b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Jeremy DazzoChris HunterClint Nesmith
Amy OffillRichie RobinsonChris Stanfield
Victoria Thomason
Data Integrity ProfessionalsData Integrity Professionals
![Page 2: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813c28550346895da5a32b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Entity Relationship Model
![Page 3: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813c28550346895da5a32b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Logical Database Design
![Page 4: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813c28550346895da5a32b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Technical Feasibility (Moderate)• Familiarity with Business Processes (High)
o Team (Moderate) Team is knowledgeable of the as-is system and has
gained even more knowledge through interviews with the Housing directors
o Client (High) Students will be able to submit their technical
problems to Housing’s database. The maintenance director will be able to view
work orders and locate housing networking devices.
![Page 5: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813c28550346895da5a32b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Technical Feasibility (cont.)o Familiarity with Technology (Moderate) Team (High)
• Hardware All members have used personal computers,
servers, and PDAs.• Software (Moderate to high)
Windows OS Dreamweaver, VS, Excel, PowerPoint, Access,
Visio, Project, Windows Server 2003 and XP, and Firefox used to create and implement the future system
The members have a moderate- to high-level knowledge of multiple computer languages
![Page 6: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813c28550346895da5a32b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Technical Feasibility (cont.)
o Familiarity with Technology (Moderate) (cont.) Client (Moderate)• Users of the “to-be” system:o Computer techso Housing staffo On-campus students
Project Size: (Moderate)• 3 computer techs• 2 months of design and implementation• Relatively low development costs• Low financial risk
![Page 7: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813c28550346895da5a32b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Cost Benefit Analysis
![Page 8: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813c28550346895da5a32b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Organizational Feasibility (Moderate)o Project Champion
Richard Robinson, Assistant IT Directoro Organizational Management
Melanie Peel, Louisiana Tech Housing Director Annie Jantz, Room Assignments CoordinatoroSystems Users Main users• Computer Techs• On-Campus Students• Maintenance Director• Housing Staff
oOther stakeholders Parents of on-campus students
![Page 9: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813c28550346895da5a32b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Size Risk Assessment
![Page 10: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813c28550346895da5a32b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Technical Risk Assessment
![Page 11: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813c28550346895da5a32b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Technical Risk Assessment (cont.)
![Page 12: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813c28550346895da5a32b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Structure Risk Assessment
![Page 13: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813c28550346895da5a32b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Total Risk
![Page 14: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813c28550346895da5a32b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Risk Reduction
Adjustments:
Size Risk Adjustments: None
Technical Risk Adjustments: Project team may need to review software required to build the system.
Structure Risk Adjustments: Basing new web-based entry forms on current work order forms may assist in the transition to the new system, reducing risk.