jeff’s slides

26
Jeff’s slides

Upload: owen-mckenzie

Post on 01-Jan-2016

38 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Jeff’s slides. Transportation. Kitchener Transportation Master Plan. Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of travel Cycling Walking Transit Goods movement Transportation Demand Management Supportive of Regional initiatives. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Jeff’s slides

Transportation

Kitchener Transportation Master Plan

Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of travel– Cycling– Walking– Transit– Goods movement– Transportation Demand Management– Supportive of Regional initiatives

TDM Plan

Long Term

Parking Strategy

Parking Enterprise

PedestrianCharter

RTMP

Transportation Master Plan

Transportation Master

Plan

?

Land Use & Planning

Policies

Cycling Master

Plan

Regional Transportation Master Plan

The purpose of the RTMP is to establish a multi-modal system of integrated transportation infrastructure and policies that build upon and support the Rapid Transit System and the land use objectives in the ROP.

• Transit network plan and priorities• Active transportation – walking & cycling• Transportation Demand Management• Intelligent transportation system improvements• Inter-Regional transit service integration• Road network plan and priorities• Policy support• Parking• Congestions management

Cycling Master Plan

• Approved in principle Sept 7, 2010• Combination of cycling network, policies,

practices and programs• 159 km of cycling facilities• Key objectives:

– Attract new cyclists– Strengthen cycling policies– Create a bikeway network– Increase bicycle parking– Expand programs to support cycling– Increase funding for bicycle facilities– Create a sustainable culture of cycling development

Pedestrian Charter

To create an urban environment in all parts of the city that encourages and supports walking

Based on the principles of:– Accessibility – Equity– Health and well being– Environmental sustainability– Personal and community safety– Community cohesion and vitality

Transportation Demand Management

TDM is a wide range of policies, programs, services and products that affect whether, why, when where and how people travel

TDM programs and strategies are meant to encourage greater use of sustainable modes of transportation and trip decision making that reduces, combines or shortens vehicle trips.

Goals:– Reduce the demand for parking in downtown

Kitchener by encourage travel by other modes– Reduce the use of single occupancy vehicle travel– Support active and sustainable modes of

transportation

Cory’s slides

Parking Organizational Review

Business Case

Parking Organizational ReviewBusiness Case

Parking Organizational ReviewBusiness Case

Parking Organizational ReviewBusiness Case

Parking Organizational ReviewBusiness Case

Parking Organizational ReviewBusiness Case

2003 Council Direction

• That parking should operate as an enterprise providing a return on investment

• That the City should continue in the parking business to ensure control

• That parking subsidies should be considered an economic development tool and be accounted for accordingly

Parking Organizational ReviewBusiness Case

Business case reviewed 3 options

• Do Nothing Alternative• Parking Enterprise Alternative• Parking Authority Alternative

Parking Organizational ReviewBusiness Case

Business Model Criteria:

• Develop a user pay system that doesn’t impact the tax base

• Provide an annual dividend to the City• Be supportive of urban intensification and

redevelopment• Incorporate and be supportive of TDM

principles• Position the City to maintain existing parking

infrastructure and expand when warranted

Parking Organizational ReviewBusiness Case

Financial Criteria• Enterprise dividends to the City will result in a

minimal or no levy impact to the tax base• Enterprise dividend to the City will be

consistent and will be adjusted for inflation annually

• All future parking related capital expenditures will be the responsibility of the enterprise

• The enterprise will not budget for a deficit in any year of operation

Parking Organizational ReviewBusiness Case

Alternative 1 – Do Nothing

• Major capital programs impact capital budget• Not supportive of cycling and TDM initiatives• Inconsistent with Council resolution

Parking Organizational ReviewBusiness Case

Alternative 2 – Parking Enterprise• All parking functions consolidated• Self fund all operating, maintenance and

capital programs• Revenue & investment decisions linked• City retains full ownership and control• Pays yearly dividend• Funds Cycling Master Plan and TDM• More effective use as an economic

development tool• Complies with Council resolution

Parking Organizational ReviewBusiness Case

Alternative 3 – Parking Authority• All parking functions consolidated• Self fund all operating, maintenance and

capital programs• Revenue & investment decisions linked• Pays yearly dividend• Complies with Council resolution• City loses direct control of parking operations• Business model may conflict with Council

policies

Parking Organizational ReviewBusiness Case

0

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

10,000,000

12,000,000

2011 2013 2015 2017 2019

Parking Enterprise Forecast

Net Revenue

Capital

Expenses

Parking Organizational ReviewBusiness Case

Benefits of implementing a Parking Enterprise

• Shifts the onus for the operation and development of parking from the tax base to the parking user

• Positions the City to develop any future parking in partnership with the private sector

• Provides consistent dividend to City• Removes capital budget impact and fluctuations• Parking rate increases fund the Cycling Master Plan and TDM

initiatives• Provides best integration with other transportation initiatives• Supports reurbanization – allows for removal of surface

parking lots for more intense development• Business model will only allow the development of warranted

and fully funded parking expansion• Supports higher densities in the core where modal split is

greatest

Parking Organizational ReviewBusiness Case

Recommendations:

• That a Parking Enterprise be approved in principle as outlined in the attached business case, subject to final 2011 budget approval;

• That monthly parking rate increases of 10%

annually between 2011 and 2014 inclusive be incorporated into the annual budget;

• That a net tax levy increase of 0.51% in 2011 be referred to the 2011 budget review;

Parking Organizational ReviewBusiness Case

That the following key principles of a Parking Enterprise be adopted;

– That all assets and liabilities associated with the expansion, maintenance, operation, ownership and potential sale of the City’s parking facilities become those of the Parking Enterprise;

– That an opening surplus of $1,070,000 in 2011 be funded from the City’s Capital Budget in order to complete scheduled structural repairs in the Duke & Ontario Garage;

– That an annual dividend in the amount of $1,750,000, plus annual inflationary increases, be paid to the City from the Parking Enterprise;

Parking Organizational ReviewBusiness Case

– That the Parking Enterprise annually retain all surplus funds in the appropriate reserve accounts in order to fund all future operating, capital improvement and expansion costs related to the municipal parking operation;

– That one (1) Parking Manager position (full-time), one (1) Transportation Demand Management Coordinator position (full-time) and one (1) Transportation Planning Project Manager position (full-time) be approved; and further,

– That annual funding for the implementation of the Cycling Master Plan in the amount of $200,000 and Transportation Demand Management initiatives in the amount of $200,000, as may be approved by Council, be funded from the Parking Enterprise