jeff warren coastal hazards analyst june 2004 science panel draft recommendations for beach...

27
JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph

Upload: jonathan-medina

Post on 27-Mar-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph

JEFF WARRENCoastal Hazards Analyst

June 2004

Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment

Criteria

Photo by Rudi Rudolph

Page 2: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph

OUTLINE

•Why worry about nourishment sediment?

•Timeline of sediment criteria discussions

•Organization of current recommendations

•Review of current recommendations

•Where do we go from here?

Page 3: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph

(3) Beach Nourishment. Sand used for beach nourishment shall be compatible with existing grain size and type. Sand to be used for beach nourishment shall be taken only from those areas where the resulting environmental impacts will be minimal.

15A NCAC 07H.0308 Specific Use Standards for Ocean Hazard Areas

(a) Ocean Shoreline Erosion Control Activities:

EXISTING LANGUAGE

Page 4: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph

Emerald Isle at 19th Street Public Access Site during 2003

nourishment project where a fine was imposed for carbonate content

Photo by Rudi Rudolph

Why worry about nourishment?

Page 5: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph

TIMELINE•MARCH 2002 Science Panel subcommittee created to discuss sediment criteria in response to shell abundance in Bogue Banks nourishment project

•SEPT 2002 Early suggestions included sampling protocol of beach to be nourished, the inclusion of borrow areas, and the avoidance of a simple statewide standard

Page 6: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph

•OCT 2003 Based on subcommittee efforts and discussions to date, entire Science Panel felt recommendations were close to completion and would devote the next meeting entirely to sediment criteria

•NOV 2003, MARCH and MAY 2004 Three Science Panel meetings devoted solely to sediment criteria

•JUNE 2004 Language and organization of recommendations streamlined and reviewed by entire Panel

Page 7: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph

ORGANIZATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS

1. General Definitions

2. Characterization of Beach to be Nourished

3. Characterization of Borrow Site Material

4. Compatibility of Borrow Site Material to Beach to be Nourished

Page 8: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph

Fifth Section to be Considered:

5. Post-nourishment Monitoring and Mitigation

Page 9: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph

1. DEFINITIONS

Beach Nourishment

Borrow Area

Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve

Page 10: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph

Source: USGS

Page 11: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph

1. DEFINITIONS

Beach Nourishment

Borrow Area

Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve

Compatible

Sediment

Grain Size

Page 12: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph

Wentworth Grain-Size

Scale

Page 13: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph
Page 14: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph
Page 15: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph
Page 16: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph
Page 17: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph

2. CHARACETRIZATION OF BEACH TO BE NOURISHED

• Compatible sediment

• Sediment sampling

• Sediment analysis

Page 18: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph

GOAL: Sediments similar to existing beach

Page 19: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph
Page 20: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph

Longitudinal Sampling Profile

Page 21: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph

3. CHARACETRIZATION OF BORROW SITE MATERIAL

•Site characterization techniques

•Defined as a mineral reserve

•Average grain size for entire site in addition to coarse (>4.76 mm) and fine (<0.0625) fractions

•Navigation channel maintenance

Page 22: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph

4. COMPATIBILITY OF BORROW SITE MATERIAL TO BEACH TO BE NOURISHED

•Coarse sediment (>4.76 mm)

cannot exceed 4% plus native

•Fine sediment (<0.0625 mm)

cannot exceed 5% plus native

Page 23: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph

Photo by Rudi Rudolph

SUMMARYScience Panel has made excellent progress applying complex technical issues to NC beaches

Page 24: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph

Photo by Rudi Rudolph

SUMMARYScience Panel devoted to finishing sediment compatibility recommendations in a timely manner

Page 25: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph

Photo by Rudi Rudolph

SUMMARYScience Panel cautious of rushing the final nourishment sediment criteria recommendations to the CRC

Page 26: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph

Photo by Rudi Rudolph

SUMMARYOctober Science Panel meeting will again focus solely on sediment compatibility issues

Page 27: JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph

Photo by Rudi Rudolph

SUMMARYFinal recommendations possible by October CRC meeting