jeff ackermann colorado energy outlook june 26, 2013
TRANSCRIPT
Jeff Ackermann
Colorado Energy Outlook
June 26, 2013
2
The Colorado Energy Office promotes sustainable economic development in Colorado through
advancing the state’s energy market and industry to create jobs, increase energy security, lower long term consumer costs, and protect our
environment.
JOBS SECURITY COST ENVIRONMENT
Vision
Colorado Energy Office | www.colorado.gov/energy© 2011 State of Colorado
CEO Program Overview
Program Program Description
CommercialBuildings
Technical assistance, grants for energy efficiency retrofits
Finance Revolving Loan Fund, Green Credit Reserve, QECB
ResidentialBuildings
Green MLS & Appraiser MOU
Greening Govt./EPC
Decreasing public sector utility bills, financing EE retrofits
Weatherization Energy efficiency assistance to low-income residents.
Colorado Energy Office | www.colorado.gov/energy© 2011 State of Colorado
Transportation Fuels
16 state MOU to convert state fleets to CNGCharge Ahead Colorado (EVSE funding)Refuel Colorado (Promoting Alternative Fuels & Vehicles)
3
Colorado Oil and Gas Production since 1999
1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 20110
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500Oil Gas
MM
bb
ls
BC
F
Oil production has grown 124% since 1999, a 6.4% CAGR
Gas production has grown 83% since 1999, a 4.8% CAGR
Colorado Energy Office | www.colorado.gov/energy© 2011 State of Colorado
4
5
Colorado is a Net Importer of Oil, but a Net Exporter of Natural Gas
Colorado Energy Office | www.colorado.gov/energy© 2011 State of Colorado
2010 2011 2012
-5000
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
Natural Gas in Colorado Million GGE
Production Consumption Exports
2010 2011 2012
-5000
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
Oil in Colorado Million GGE
Production Consumption Imports
Note: 2012 state consumption numbers not yet published- extrapolated from 2011 U.S. consumption and 2011state share of U.S. consumptionOil and gas consumption: EIA SEDSOil and gas production: COGCC
6
Natural Gas Vehicle Benefits
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013$0.00
$1.00
$2.00
$3.00
$4.00
$5.00
U.S. Average Retail Fuel Prices
Gasoline CNG Diesel Biodiesel
CNG acts as a natural hedge in two ways
• By adding a new fuel to the state’s mix, creating less dependence on oil prices.
• ~32% of CNG price at the pump is commodity cost, versus 56% for
gas/diesel.
Bottom line: it will save money
Fuel Gasoline Diesel CNG
Price / GGE $3.87 $4.09 $2.09
Low fuel costs equate to long term savings and shorter payback timeframes
Colorado Energy Office | www.colorado.gov/energy© 2011 State of Colorado
7
Colorado's NGV Commitment
Colorado Energy Office | www.colorado.gov/energy© 2011 State of Colorado
On November 9, 2011, Governor John
Hickenlooper signed an MOU with the governor of OK to use CNG vehicles in
the two states’ fleets.
Since then, 14 other governors have signed on the MOU, committing to increased CNG vehicle
usage.
8
Other Technologies
Colorado Energy Office | www.colorado.gov/energy© 2011 State of Colorado
Biomass
NIMBYism: fear of air pollution.
Access and transportation.
Stewardship contracts limited to 10 years.
Biofuels
Current generation is reaching “blendwalls” – the
limits allowed in normal fuels – a sign of success.
Next generation needs R&D work
Source: Breakthrough Institute
The Gap: Near-ready technologies - insufficient venture capital
Too risky for traditional financing
CEO’s Revolving Loan Fund (RLF)
Dollars awarded
Dollars Leveraged
Jobs Created
Energy Saved
Colorado Energy Office | www.colorado.gov/energy© 2011 State of Colorado
9
10Colorado Energy Office | www.colorado.gov/energy© 2011 State of Colorado
No existing class of financing institution is effectively positioned to address this particular risk/return category. This begs the question: what role should the public sector play in addressing this serious financing issue?
Why the RLF?
This represents a structural market failure that hasn’t been addressed by the private sector acting on its own
Appraiser MOUCommits the groups and CEO to work together to promote/document home energy features and develop studies to identify Colorado market-specific trends in energy valuation over time.
Homeowners: less incentive to make energy improvements
Real estate brokers: less likely to market green features mortgage lenders; may not lend more to cover the cost of an efficient home
Potential buyers: less likely to put in a higher offer.
Goal: understand impacts on home value of energy efficiency and renewable energy improvements.
Issue: Appraisers unable to demonstrate a reliable market response to energy features.
Governor signed with Colorado’s two major professional organizations:
1. Colorado Coalition of Appraisers
2. Appraisal Institute - CO Chapter
Colorado Energy Office | www.colorado.gov/energy© 2011 State of Colorado
11
Green MLS
• The Green MLS is an Energy Efficiency field in the MLS guide used by realtors.
• Enables home buyers to search for energy efficiency upgrades when buying and sellers to list them as added features.
Colorado Energy Office | www.colorado.gov/energy© 2011 State of Colorado
12
13
Where do the MLS Vendors Stand Today?
4%
2%
4%
Need Additional Fields
Have Not Adopted
No Official Board or MLS Vendor*
Colorado Energy Office | www.colorado.gov/energy© 2011 State of Colorado
90%Adoption
15% 30%(or more)
14Colorado Energy Office | www.colorado.gov/energy© 2011 State of Colorado
Typical Facility Energy Savings Opportunity:
*Savings realized by increasing equipment and operational efficiency.
The process through which energy efficiency and capital improvements are funded (fully or partially) by the energy and
maintenance cost savings generated by the improvements themselves when the cost savings are financed over a period of time.
Energy Performance Contracting (EPC)
15
Energy Performance Contracting
Colorado Energy Office | www.colorado.gov/energy© 2011 State of Colorado
Energy Savings Measures funded through guaranteed savings.
Reallocate money already being spent in utility budget to purchase efficiency
and capital improvements.
16
Energy Efficiency Resource Standard
Colorado Energy Office | www.colorado.gov/energy© 2011 State of Colorado
Demand-Side Management (DSM): encouraging reduced usage (demand) to delay or avoid new power plant investments
Premise: New generation costs $X per unit (MW); if DSM can avoid that MW for less than $X, it's a better investment
Challenges:
confidence that demand has been reduced
works against utility business model
CO Public Policy: requires investor-owned utilities to pursue DSM and include in resource planning; (treat DSM as a resource)
(Some municipal utilities and cooperatives are also pursuing DSM)
17
Colorado’s Generation Mix
Colorado Energy Office | www.colorado.gov/energy© 2011 State of Colorado
Coal 80.10%
Pe-troleum 0.20%
Natural Gas 16.20%
Hydro 3.30% Other 0.20%
2000
Natural Gas19.39%
Coal60.98%
Hyrdo3.32%
Wind15.86%
Solar0.34%
Other0.11%
March 2013
18
Renewable Energy Standard
Colorado Energy Office | www.colorado.gov/energy© 2011 State of Colorado
Amendment 37 (2004)
10% renewable Energy by 2015
Applies to utilities with 40,000+ customers
HB7-1281 (2007)
Increase to 20% renewable energy for Investor Owned Utilities
HB10-1001 (2010)
30% standard for investor owned utilities (~60% of CO generation)
10% standard for rural electric cooperatives and municipal utilities over 40,000 customers (~25% of CO generation)
SB13-252 (2013)
20% standard for rural electric cooperatives over 100,000 customers
Permits waste to energy, and coal mine methane capture technologies into RES
19
Generation Mix Comparison
Colorado Energy Office | www.colorado.gov/energy© 2011 State of Colorado
Colorado California Washington Alabama Iowa Massachusetts0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Other
Biomass
Petroleum
Nuclear
Geothermal
Solar Thermal and PV
Wind
Hydro
Natural Gas
Coal
20
SB 13-252: Moving Beyond the Rhetoric
Governor’s Rationale for Signing:
•Removes In-State Preference (current lawsuit)•Redefines “eligible energy resources” to support rural initiatives:
•Electricity from municipal solid waste•Electricity from coal mine methane
•Current electric cooperative achievements•Achieving 10% renewables without a 1% net rate impact
•Electric resource diversity tempers rate increases•Federal tax credit (wind production) expires 2014
21
SB 13-252: Moving Beyond the Rhetoric
Governor’s Concerns with SB 13-252:
•Ability of cooperatives (& Tri-State) to achieve goal by 2020•Rate impact upon customers
•Fully understanding & implementing the “rate cap” provision
•Supporting the “pooling” of renewable credits between coops
Implementation Plan:
•Advisory Committee: fact-based analysis of the concerns•Commitment to legislative fixes in 2014, if substantiated
22
Contact Us
Colorado Energy Office (CEO)
State of ColoradoJohn W. Hickenlooper, Governor1580 Logan Street, Suite OL1Denver, Colorado 80203
The Colorado Energy Office
@coenergyoffice
Colorado Energy Office | www.colorado.gov/energy© 2011 State of Colorado