DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN & CHILD DEVELOPMENT (ACCOUNTS BRANCH)

GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI 1, PT. RAVI SHANKAR SHUKLA LANE,

K.G. MARG, NEW DELHI-110001

MOST URGENT TIME BOUND

F. 76/Acctts./Audit/2016-17/ Lf ti 5 3 - 6-3- Dated

Subject: Settlement of old outstanding paras. 2 2 JAN 2018 Please refer to this office letter of even no. dated 27.02.2017 and its reminder dated

15.03.2017 regarding submission of replies to outstanding audit paras issued by the Auditor General (Audit), Delhi and also refer to circular No. F.76NVCD/IAR/HQ/2016-17/17351-500 dated 28.08.2017 regarding outstanding audit paras issued by the Directorate of Audit, GNCT of Delhi.

In this regard, Chief Secretary, Delhi has taken a serious view for non-submitting of the reply to the audit, resulting of which a number of audit paras are lying pending and Chief Secretary, Delhi directed for settlement/furnishing of replies to the AG (Audit), Delhi and Directorate of Audit, GNCT of Delhi.

The details of pending audit paras issued by the AG (Audit), Delhi is enclosed for ready reference i.e. Part-II-A & Part-II 13 of report along with Annexure-A & B. As regards, audit paras issued by the Directorate of Audit, GNCT of Delhi the details of outstanding paras as per annexure-C attached which is also available with full details at website hftp://audit.delhigovt.nic.in/appswir outpara.asp?deptid=119.

It is, therefore, directed to submit the replies along with supporting documents to AG (Audit), Delhi as well as to the Directorate of Audit, GNCT of Delhi for its settlement on top priority under intimation to this office.

This may be given top priority.

Copy to: 1. All the Deputy Directors working 2. All the HOO working under WC 3. OSD to Director (WCD). 4. PA to SpI. Director, WCD. 5. Asstt. Programmer to upload on website.

1—/ (P.C. Jain)

Special Director (WCD)

under Department of Women & Child Development. D.

2. Budget Allotment and Exoendittirs. The details of the 6:Adger-allotment and expenditure incurred during:lhe *years 200?-08 to 20) 0- I .1 a as under:-

L S'

I No. Year(5) Plan . . Non-Plan Allocation 1 Progressive Allocation Progressive

fr Budget Total --- Budget - ' Total - - 1. 2007:08 210838000 • 182329261 31235000 23333365 2. 2008-09 314260530 . ;210832163 ...26061000 18871794 3. 2009-10

I

349550000-, -.240594349 : ,-.,.i.;229.00000 ' 26630918 4, 2010,-11 451267000 . , -•35.4951$74 ' ' :-:-.@.87645000 32973787

3. Position of Outstanding Paras

NIL (First Audit) - 4. Internal Audit - Conducted upto 2008-2009

jart4I A

Para 1: Loss.of interest amount :7g K;. 6.20 Crore due to,adoption of Wrong.frivestment policy.

The Delhi Ladli Scheme was launched and notified by the Government of NCT of Delhi on 1st February 2008 with the following objectives:-

(a) To enhance the social stew; of a girl child in the society as well as in the family; (b) To ensure proper education and mhke the child self reliant; (c) To ensure economic security for the child; (d) To protect the child from discrimination and deprivation and (e) The scheme would be effective from 1st January 2008.

( ----The financial arrungement.for theimplementation of this scheme was made with the State Bank .o

India for providing front end services. Stilife Insurance iwas engaged for the investments of the amount

deposited under the Leda Scheme from tinvi to time.

Under the scheme, the Carq,:;:eni Authority may, subject to thc provisions, release grant in the term of a long term .deposit under the name of eligible girl child in the following manner: -

kyment Bs. 11,000/: if the girl child is:born in a Hospital/Nutting

Hom e: in .the Natorb:LAW. ii) Payrrient of Rs. 10,000/-if the girl child is .born outside the above

mentioned Hospitals/Nursing Hotnes/institutions. iii) Payment of ICS. 50001- on admission of the.child in. Class.' iv) Payment of Rs. 50001- on admission of the child in Class VI v) Payment of 14.5000/- on admission of the child in Class IX:

r

vij Pay. trierit.014ks.'3000fr :on the third .pass(titort: tlass X • . , .: vii) paythoif orps. :50pac 'on admission ofteehihir in Class X/1

. . .

The objectives of Ladli '.Scheme is to,: provide financial assistance as .per thd-milestones40.?,

, .:.: - . . 1 mentioned above and *tfa provide a•:.Itiinpitnn accumulated fund onddl:.;.4110-girr.thild attains:the:age* . . . eighteen. It is necessary to maintain an overall running account for ea:" il. te,h. scheme as a whole ...

5).,-,..-..s. .•• ,, ,...- - ,7C , 1.1:2:''.*&1;1. purpose of financial control and yeaoficiliation. Therefore, proposalfiffi4MtseVen scheduled ti pato AT; , 41/tnc invited in .order to identify the bankh181.19aftners for the Lad!' Schemeal-tgie•quentlY fivC.;•,41.05e..,,;51-4I.3

Life Insurance Co. Ltd.- (SBIL) reepondeL A comparative study 84ftie;. rates, offered by the bet- dea.fe-,- . • • •..„ .. -. . fed."7-:•:-;::.. .. • • , ' - ]. revealed that the (Mien BankofindittikLIBB offered rilLtin-ium aniountligAs.'86;284/gintetestaftkt, cent, whereas whereas SBM offeredonlyitS.$414552•;@ interest of 10.50 per eerit144.1ocking period of 18 yeam ..,c , . . .. •

•I ft .

All the banks mentioned thattaSlier-the :Reserve Bank,,of InatiSetirre.nt guidelihes,ff).fliek•aitildi, - • - .

...;:le:..: .. ::.' - . ": •4K.1::•jg not have a lock-in period of morn flitin::*"..0-.Y4ars- in.--3.4 t.flus, money iolfiblct:b: receive*isjence4:::#lif. deposits for the period of 18 years.... :ThertitilerfiaVeM re-inVeirtheatena. after 10 yea0;.Conithe isiia. hand, SBIL did not put such.rosiricticefeeahlltion..,-trias,,SBIL was ritrat;..dti.liiiving albekLiitiperre4t. 18 years at fixed rate of interest (10:501ser:ceet), r.c.,5‘..;-

Audit, however, observed that finance Department and Lawbtif;'4' eiitiotbicT of Delhi.adViie.a . . ..

P tu

the Government not to invest in •nottkanking -Insidtptions because dtstic,...i.„ z ..... er ,risktkil flu ' Investment in- public sector •baok.SOSBe)*ais.•alWayS:pieferreddieeti "it:, 1 , ifitif :b04.4teilkIliOlefr '

Or4;''•664:'af h'''e4C1'.

. —.... - - .... . ...4.;iip.,,i.„ -....:.,..7„:,F.:.: ,,t!.::::"

given by the bank (LIBI).waetorriPaiii;$1Y:t;,loviee',thitywhat wa.s .i•iV stili'Ir

contracted rate of interest on fixeddepositel for.a-tenii Often yeare... ithr.. . , . . ..;,..,v, i...,:.ti.d ifhilulErl.‘:701fiAcAtOd!' of SBIL, the UBI should have -beent. Preferrtiid. But ignoring the advise8th5 fii&eDe';:etiftherifitit•IZX: ;

Department of NCT of Delhi, the,•„De ailment appointed SBIL.for ' 1{'..' jgg,i,the anyestments,undetalwi i'Ze -1

,

scheme on the terms and condiuoiis is submitted by the company: ArF;:k.c.. . ' ..• • ••• .". -5c.. ..'. •. • ::: :t. PN.V , ,--...-:.: ,.. - •-:.74.444S:AivrA3

'.• •:..-P-! 1-; ' .

It was, however, reyealodi•Mfaticlit'Mat theilSB31;-insteackbf•Pf6,7fliiig.•interestV19:50.4*.s. ,.... committed, provided interest ®:63 per: cent./ per cent and 25 per cep Ontig:the:yearqpki-Q9,'20.9 '.gf ., and 2010-11 respectively. These intMiasitMes are much loss Than 'What as, , Miriittedby the tithe •,?),FOrtPi?

1, ;.- al

'tc.);t:. ..".........

their.ienSetnerit, • This resulted in a.--16. • ,6:20:•Croi*on aecohili7th

Sector Banks and•SBIL itself. It was else observed that the compiny coc; ot provide any lock-incji.,

which was the main basis for ...;c:

. .. . ,... lower rate of interest during the yearil0IIS-49;'2009LI0:alicI20104.1-- eCla*Id‘v:. , - .- . • Year Committed

interest Rate

(per cent)

Amount as per the committo Interest Rate(Rs.) ,

• !Merest rate provided by the SBIL

(par cent)

TESK'filtetfest. Diffecenc'cit,oWA;;:i.,

2008-09. 10.50 1,87,66,231 . 63 1,107a91 71,49,040 );J 2009-10 10.50 9,80,36,917 7.00 . 6,5357,945 3,26,78,972 ..

t,o;38.g2,9o4 r2-14t0.358.•

01;74;3501

With this rate of intcrest;,the Department would be able to &Ryer:Only Rs.60 to 65-thousand: .itti . • time of maturity. whielft:Was;Mugh 1 less then the committed amount of 'one lakh. This may itz,ia) • resentment amongst the beneficiaries at the time of maturity. On hand. the 'Oovernmenrhia:s already suffered a loss of Rs:6.20,Crore till March 2011 due to reduced rate of interest *provided by SSIL' This loss would increase many tolda with the advancement and papulaiiiitiOn of the scheme:-

It was also observed that the:SIM. had charged Rs 2.19 lakh IS:risk premium and Rs7:88 •

renewal premium (inclushie of service tax) up to the year 2010-11. As.sper'agreement, there was na-Tatiali: clause to charge any premium Moreover, the SB)L itself mentioned -that theY wouldibt.eltaig

lakh) in the year 2010-11, will owe figure liabilities also if SBJL is allowed handling charges. ;

amount for handling. Thus; the Department aPart.from a loss of Rs. te0a-f.lakh (Rs. 2.19:1alai 47 I01:g,

Non-fulfillment of commitment the SBIL and loss of . 6 2suffered th 6 Tore by the ovemmen needs elucidation in audit.

Facts and figuies mentioned above may beeentitined and any changes, if any, may be intimated to the Audit within three days from receipt of this letter.

It is also requested to be furnished the Department the mode K{#may

„L..; Insurance. Under what scheme money is be'ing transferred. Whether there:'thekeine's,i0government at the time of submissiorlof proposal; by SBI Life Insuran

1

. • Para 2 : Irregular expenditure:ofIts. 22.43 lakh on 'Smile Cards'.

Government of NCT of Delhi decided Co popularize "Dellik'Ladli Scheme" through - Smile Cards. Under this,.thethOd-Of Campaign-any person wa'S-44*Cled.:-and photographe4.6ii,..

random basis. That photo was .pasted<on- a card; haVing signaft.tre4OhielMirtister ofDelhi: The. said cards were posted at the .addresses bl the' randomly selectedtOiktria With a message &fatea - on the envelope that if any girl child was born in the knowledgeigithe receiver of the card.:and-;

yearly income of her parents wail cc limn one lakh, then enco*cge therri to register that*.1 , .

under Ladli Scheme.

For this publicity campaign, ivlis Ved Pohoja& ASsociates were selected ' on

recommendation of Bhagidari Cell of the Chief Minister of Delhi. Scrutiny of the re,cords

. . •

vcalcd• that the Depattnttni played .519 role in selecting. the agene[y.... but The Chiel:•MiiiiSi • . , .• .. ,

office selecticil the agency and the derirtment was asked to get:the work Jolie throtigh• use

agency.

During scrutiny of records relating to "Delhi Smile Card;:...ihe follow mgshorteomri}gs,

were noticed: - • -

Rule I51 of the•Geheral Financial Rules (OFR) envisages that.the Method of Limited -Teltde le:

Enquiries fronithe registered'suppliers may be adopted wheirte'Siimated value ofithe gocidatit;

procured is up.to Rs. 25 lakh. Where as method of Single tender Enquiry should gsdi only when dies-elsan emergency-or comitmdity'to be procuredIrapinpriety item.'

It was observed.theflpitially a f.oik cider for 10000 StiilleCards.® Its 54 ;per card

total cost of Rs. 5,40,000 was awarded to an agency (M/s. y.i.d.Pohokt & AssoCiatei).'w

following the prescribed procedure. Thework order was further to 36,963 Smile_;

(10,000 + 21,333 + 5,630) by the Chief:Minister's Office otr he same terns .and-en

amounting to Rs. 22.43 lakir Without the prior approvattif the:competent authority. „ • .

The Department replied:that in view of low registraiibit&iPtirl'ehild':untler the aey ate

there was an urgency to launch ihe Sainnessnarnpaiti.,Thelf,ecilYi iS.riot ace:001.114

emergency was found on recorda Morebver• the said propa .! subtiu

16 January 2008, whereas :the ;scheme wis notified

understood as to how the Agency carat to known about'

launch.

Persons to be photographed:were to be seeded on randt.rk: aSis at predecidedloOtt:16, - . Delhi. However; it was noticed flan the de!ails of personavAlim cards were dispatcheki that a

large number of people from other states were issued “Delhif*ilre Cards", which was of noose; ; •

as the scheme was meant for the citizens of Delhi only. Th4lithe main parpose of awareness

campaign was tbrfeited.

(iii) The Department of WCD did not approach Directorate ofAudib Visual Publieity, publicity campaign but:hired:a -Consultant for the purpose,'-whickwaS.-not at alta:viablemedia

for campaign. The campaign -through consultant reirchenUly 0.28 per cent of the total

population of Delhi, which was not at all &healthy representation. Thus, the expenditure ?fits.

22.43 lakh incurred on issue of Smile Cards cannot be treat ,Earuitful expenditure.

Facts and figures mentioned :above*ay be confirmed and any changes; if any, maybe ifitiniatg,(0. the Audit within three days from receipt ofiths :otter

Pan 3: Avoidable expenditure of:Rs:;:81.89 faith.

• _ •

The scheme Ladli was . started. by State Govt. w.e.f.:41.:62.2008. ThisTschenfel applicable for those people of Delni::Whose annual income is upto-;:s: 1 Lalch. This sehetie„ being popularized by various' SOntceS.i;e. throUgh.Health Parade bition, Tv/Cable-0i Nukkar Natalc/Dreams„lioardnigs;NeWspapers, Railway Publik ugh Hoardings; Uni Back Lit Piller Panel, Videos Spots::eic. and P. r )ay say that eve eisOn: of Delhi-is- kw about this scheme.

Scrutiny of records revealed that DMRC conducted a surveyrori the profile of Metro uses. which found that 70% of metro, users rnnle;":83yo:of the CoMnicife income group and only 2% corntrinte**ere...fteni)OW ifidokne.

was started. An agency e.g, cOmniifiliedriOn proposed fo inside Delhi Metro Train oh-basis of Survey conducted by'D.

department without eorisiderMg',thetsntvey tepoit and mivit4 panels of size 22"x8"iriside- DelbiliatiOnrairsliaTvins:twO pant to 3132010 which was iestende4;*103:1-..1.01-0,thiiiiiicioca

five months @ Rs. 16,37,955/-: per :rottf-, whiclreould laVec

taken on survey report as onlY.r.;;:eotanmiers of Mete trainipe

In response to Audit Memo No. 28:,dated:18.012012 dep the scheme could only be achieved when all ft population of Do perception AS well as mind Set,ie:ctitinged. whihWaS not satiSfac:f of Financial property under fule2Itof0FR.

t. Para 4(a):-IvIisutilization of RsA014k Laktren:Celebratiort Of .iiiieriationat WonzenDa

Celebration of International %A/omen day was being orgamze"..: y Delhi - CommissiOniifOr

as again intimated by thatommission in-Feb 5200.84:ka , • R- - n 07-03-2008. During the Mean time in file meetiiitton,z

01-03-2008, Deptt.of WCD decided to organize the above function ,n collaboration with

•

•

tvciecl)filnghOdeciSibe0

osagove scheme.

ent re lied

and against

Hof

re“

Women from Past 2-3 Years. Proposal w

celebrate the International' Women .Day

oriunission of Women .An esiimam (ii Rs:47.99 1,akh was .prepa!ed includ Li.) is chargeS, general decor/souvenirs ure, .t1n 'St' expenses of DeptuWistolturai act: wi, proposal:that this expenditure wouid: be incurred from the LadiWilpthead of acco..znts 2 2(1)(4)(21) for the year 2007.08:

Strutiny of records revealed that Department incurred Ocpenditure of ks.40.25 t

cdebrating International Women Day on 7.3:2008 without rpO havingl:Lapy budget for the pu , 1 above function and expenditure of Rs.30; 64,507/- from valua ,budget of tad!! schem

:,- 2008-09 and expenditure of Es.9, 50.000/- from the bud f_ event for socially,

disadvantaged persons of 2007-08 was incurred for the above full Onwithout any objectiVs ... without approval of Competent authority

Further sciutiny revealed that File was sent to Finance Depar budget approval heft20

two days of function i.e. on 05-01-2008 with-the statement th flet of Rs.70 lakh Scheme was available in 2007-08 and Finance Department sancti (biidget of Rs.39.14 1 10-03-2618 (after celebration of function) without scrutiny of a tability of budget whi'; Mentioned for approval.

It was also noticed that event Mariagernentagency submittec .1..US. '4)1ropoSal on 93-0:3* -0 the basis:of discussion..en 28.-02;2008 for the funation on dated•TO ,;2008: for cluef'co

Designeranaputer Operator for 10 days on 03-03-2008 and departtY Brit accepted and paid, vl

same against the actual days of work were 5 days(03-03-2008 to 0,7 931.2008). Further S&$ reveled the agency subMitted its proposal vide MTh Ved Pohoja4tsSOCiates.an empanelled age

of Bhagidari Cell of state Govt. but work of Thematic Zone, Ce

FiVepartieipatorY Zone, etc. were executed through other agency:,

which was not empanelled with State Govt. and against the terms and Condition No a - agreement between agency and the 13hagida:4 Cell and Incurrecl,.4Penditure without completing

caudal formalities and paid Rs 44,900,-to &Vs Ved Pohola--:PtiLtd. which was the Sub7 Contract& of the main agency .

Reasons for celebrating the above nn clioi.- without litialja get- and reasons for f: rttisutilisation of the valuable fund or other scheme and incuri4 141.Thc

arnll e expenditure without having budget in concerned year i.e.2002- 2008 arid executed the ctrIt without completing eciagd.,

Zone, InteraCtive

Acija Associates PVi:

formalities was called for Vide And.it Meme 6.29.

In response to audit Memo No29 dated I8-01-2012,Deptt Replied that Deptt of Finance and

Honb'le Finance Minister Concurred and clearly mentioned the budget:head and the ,function was

ettrafeid keeping in \ it W the availabilir: of 'budget and ifier74 t, co:lc:Ira:nee of coniTi- , Li, OutuOrity at top most level.

The reply of Dept— was not satialEalctory as the expenditure of 0, 64.507,1- vms inc _ .

,

from the “Ladli" scherrie, few the. year 2009-10 and Rs.9.50 Lalci-t, :the budget of event: . ., --,.e

socially and disadvantaged persons frpm me .veat 2007-08 ,whic-hi .Ws that concurrence :•o .

. _ competent authority was :without havine .budsi;et: in the year 20.01. e,p- d It was rnisutiliiak , . . ,.•1, avalueable `ladli' Scheme and aVeritafte.,.; socially'z:Md disadvantk 4 - ;: ,t.- Mons . L.. -

, ;;

Misutilization of Rs.42,66 Lakh for telecast of Video .Stin'i.t4through DD -News Cha el Without havino budget. "

.,, Department received a proposal from Mis News and Vie:0-0k I - . m '

Video Spots on DD News Channel iron) 24.7-2010 to 14.11.2011 twicaa114

1N

5-L Dept. which was accepted by the dept. and sanctioned Rs. 47,31,870/4,44

• -,-

, 91€1.?''

2235'2(1)(4)(3) "Mass Media Education and Sdy (Plan) in demand 8;0 ear 2010-11. Ir.

Scrutiny of records, real :d; that Dc,-,!-,-,-t. awarded tie ork order without h4,11.4 sufficient budget in the above major head and p:::id Y.,. ".).3;5,935/- from4r, head 223.51E(2)(0(3l Ladli Yojana (Plan) without approval ofcOrnytfin, ,...1/1,:ority , which.Sy _R,ts lisation or Further scrutiny revealed that-Deptt'agaiminiantd-:of:Tts 10;00,9121:,',S0 eitend of 2235 it

)' rts— . • : 4...,,,t.t„..

. . 'T. implementation ofrecommendation of fiRD:Ropc:;-....Pfiii• in demand,1\ft”t 4rAti pi-year 201112. foeffe; ,

,t.. it,.

purpose i.e. telecast of Video Spcits•Without -approVah of competent.:a 4 r ri.•

:‘ . '.: The: aboye seen provided by the Dept. in anticipation:cif-Audit Blum° No.23.The :misllit btion of Rs. 42.66 lakfill •S:

s`.7;145•7.1, elucidation

Para 5: Wasteful expenditure and misutililation of Rs. 2.02 crore of.flidlit scheme fUnd. .,,,

41,1 ' M/s Ajay Shukla Productions . Pvt. Ltd. 1p:oposed (10.11.20 r.':producOon."Of talk show

programme titled `Samadhan' of 30 minutes duraticn on issues ref to Programnaelsehemes.,of department of Women & Child develor,rnent (3•NCID. The agency -4: etted in his proposal to give

:CI

,- -extension of these talk shows ac thcse v,:e, e• p:,:_:tically awareness el ,

g Ziff,. arid grievances, reprisal fomms at the door steps of the poor public .vith thd 11';1p of the office , ails of the depth and dept..

c:

could also telecast these episodes on doe: darahnn. arry, ether channel or:1 *Able:TV network of the area; ,..t'.

, The proposal was accepted foi 52 epiandea of ta1te 51-ip.w (one per w.. Jthe Deptt. on approval of Hon'ble Minister of the dept. @ Rs. 1.50,000/- :::..iiix. ;Agency again sent s,,,Proposal on 26.112010 for

-

production of 70 other episodes of '7SarnadhatiL which was accep the deptt. vide letter 110:.: F.56(74)/WCD/RM/2010-11/23703 dated. 13:01 2011.

Scrutiny of records revealed that de:Part nem: awarded the abovei:',:i.4ric order to the agency and paid Rs. 86,03,400/- for 52 episodes and Rs: 1;15,81,500f- for 70 episodes -The following short comings were noticed during scrutiny of records:-

(b)

s. 4 t

r 0 ' unications for tel

of various Schemes ti

e budget under Major head

i. 'Ihe work wii:A.awtt e.• ,t-iiilY'prorics'a ;Ithe auency:withaitr01-06tillglik;dkrif5.5riiii! Wa

and availithilitjiof fuhd4rid.Withoui i.ipprOval in .annual platfugre pa i: ascrryadefitifi'myi ' ' .1 :.•:,;;.. ,....

•• head of. 'Lad' i • scheme" which -:was diik,i.ri:iion- of fund withatitir743PritiVa I ofjcornpetelina.

pi. . . .:. ''., i ...?:.:-..-.. ..-..9%.:0: •

as theSe talk shows Were based ciit different schemes of thel,..41PcjP: . "' ---"-'aca.'4 ..

.-, 4

... 2. Deptt. a.Warded:the

above work ordet.§ with the objective -61j and grievanpes,. reprisatyorums at the door steps of .tkt officers/offierats of the. 404:4iid do pt. could also telecas other:ahannel or locat -eableIN 'network of the area, E.0 prepared by theccrnpahk,as per. approyal;ofHon'ble Mints prepared the 52'talk'shoWsAh 35:daySlanO0 Talk shows int prepared these talk shows witho;lt awareness campaign inf, shooting of episodes With gathering of very -few people;.; 13 shows were conducted and.recdrds of awareness campaign -4 in these talk show for general public and. list of officials/d

• were called for vide audit.therno no. 42 dated 27.01.2(112fib.0 . ' deptt. replying that ageheyitself an-anged'these talk sfiChVii,

talk shows were displ&yed. iu- different govt. camps, Bhagi , record was provided. and.Deptc,could "nor achieve its objecti

•

3. It was also noticed that If :hese talk shows were prqe

°Mem/Officials of the deprt., these should be organized i grievanpes, reprisal forums ae.the door steps of the • 1?tic with the help of > ti7ii

awareness generation.: ,ap,:c d:4

"i";:geptt: and thera4 ' , : need for, preparation of talls;sh4W on.SE:i7A-SP/BV .13i-• se,,,V.,, 9 ,f I 4'

*kr fOi". 40 •: . 46°: telecast as the deptt. didliot-pteptie:any:ie014rehensive,tei *; '''79,5try-A InStilaileSQ'Clad

, ,i•-•;',fee ;1,.....,', . 9-1;., ly.....: ,-. and all the episedeS',Wei*:!lkitig:;idle:':h);-'stare whieh,-resu1 efixdois itittig misutilisation of Ladli - eli*lit ' 7. " ' • •

,.,. • -4

Para 6 : Wasteful expenditure of Rs: 71.69 Iakh. •

A proposal was received from Ni/S Creative Channel forprbduction of 50 Video SpOis,,,.

for awareness campaign on various scheme of Department of NVCD'40.department accep ",/

same @ RS. 1, 30,000/- + Servici: Tax per video spot (upto 60 seconds') as per DAVP rates :h

the expenditure was met from the Ladii Scheme.

As per Rule 21 of OFR (i) Every Officer is expected to exercise the same vigilance in respect of expenditure ineitn•ed frop. public moneys asXPerson of ordinary pruderiee..

•lc:::i-.7,;lt:j . - . ' fi

would exercise m respect of expenditme of his own money.

Scrutiny of records‘revez.led:ilist T.)eott incurred expenditure of Rs.16 lakh +tax

for production of 16 Video Spots on variowi sotictpt.-ts of the Deptt. ]irj(,20108-09. The time duration•., ,p.h,.

of these Video Spots was 570 Seconds imd out of whieh 33x S Were being telecasted on

Further senitiny reyeul :d 1:,;,;- E. aerairt awarded a..w.ettk order for production Of;

50 Video Spots on variouseherne,; to the abate acrerev on just receiving the proposal from the

frits,P,tilia:HY-:a ,.t...help.;;;

aFCness gen. t5

P1s44% dbi ' 'fii2igk' 70....ge Aliiii W4 fa. n7 awaw S,- which‘t. owed thatAsg Id are

rand .plac o corned

• .!:17

. • it `D"epatt also replf lark

as and Health Melas:bd •

DD News on every Sunday @ P‘s. 2500/- per tep. seconds..

~`without considering .thtinsefulnc(,c: and !la,..in E: •:ciliicient::bUdget for the above work rd . • dinturred Its. 71.'69,5.60 foi- th;c.c•••ri .of video ••:pots. whithas avoidableand waste • • •

‘, a le tli(di tune duration of above video spcits :„,*as 3000 seconds,: out of only 330 secon.

•.•

week were being telecasted and Deptt. already had video spots o seconds which should been used instead of production of nev, video spots. It was also ted that this expenclif incurred from the major head of 'Ladli Scheme' without appir4

. . . . ' .• „. .„ 4competentAittick

tie the Deptt. .1n response to Audit Memo No.23 dated 16-01-2012 the reply of Deptt.:,: satisfactory .

principal secretary.directed tor limited expenditure on thetadli:tliettie Which.Wastnotto e

It was observed that De t:. &TC:ady 16 video;:spots of various,. scheities expenditure of Rs.71:6* Lakh on"prducticci 50 video spotStf21 Schemes could havC avoided as Dept. did not haw an:, ,Dompreherisi. ”-• Plan for fulhititilization of these vicleift .For full utilization Deptt. should have been se ire for any sP0*ii'df.the, programme

42

Dept. might also able to earn revenue withont ;:lccaning expenditure on telecast, which; done by the Deptt.

Para 7 : Wasteful expenditure of:Rs.1,6:23 laid] on advertisernethAffreugli tsfi;-ehattite

of less than Rs. one. lakh per arulurn. Simiiar,y 2.0C:G•cftir•nel is priiSitk idea of the.campaign wasto create awareness amongst. the oarents•ol: Thus, the motto'of the Government the :ieherne among '14 could not get much attention. It may, the c ,t;atk:c! that the expel!. the Government to popularize the scheme tuilong the targeted population be termed as a fruitful expenditure.

Para 8: Expenditure of Rs.45.52 laxh on ariverlisQrnent or Ladli Scheme without achieving the. objectives of the awarenesstampzlifn.

The Ladli Schenie was

income families (Atuaual. incoroe apt° one heicii). •

r 01.02.2008 to strengthen the girls of tow:

v,areness carnpm of this scheme wasberd

Delhi Goverament had dontafiiiiillifnedia"carnpaign to PrOrtib .

included newspaper advertisenientS,Thiitdoit hOaraings, TV adVertiSetatit `Times Now' and 'POGO' were engaged foiihe jot%

Audit, however, noticed that 'Tinies. NoN, !tr.: ?--'4 -hours Err The majority of its viewers arc proR;ssionals aid is nor wcitched

• ,,•• hannel which broadcasts('

etql popalation; hayingft, -

Vatched by children ofilkithe! watched

and not arnongstihe kidsi

eted.populatiori through TV:.

of '16.23 lakh incurred:ht

th"rough.TV'channels could note

1ditiliT•:8;etieMe,•• „Jim Cetc Two

Para 9 : UnfruitfulinveSiment am:I:Sticking. Of:funds of Rs. 1.14 reikireS ift.

Under the Plan. Saltine' "CcinstOction-Of Working Worne-ritef, Viz Rarri::Bagh;Sai

Tuglakabad and Basant tane.wat, ajlotte'd• by ISDA.to the departmeWor ddritructiOn Of lAs011tp

.Women hostel to prOvide;dignifieditor4per AndtaffOrdable sheet.06,*Orking,worrien*.hozd'

have any'accommodatiOn5}.An”atriount:Ot. 1,14j49,854P.wa ;to; boAjpsipp frpriy.

2001 to Nitarch, 2007;ihnoUghiP-Wip4od:RS.: JB:778,;633.fcir boon': Walls •OSJpacYtiPly'firkrift

to audit.

In *this Scenario the - caristriktri:.,.-.4-.-,-Yrkic:g Women hosi#VpS. envlsagedliad ocith .

started even after a gap:Of 5 VI 10"::Yea,§aftex . uctiti;Fit,cin pfland;ittol '.:ruit Only investment p

1.14 Crore and remained UnprOdUctive but a;SUrri of RS.:361.*Okli:Paid to KftiDi0S10" .

f ff construction of Boundary.Walls became; also Wnteful arid the Arouse o provi ing a or, tk

shelters to working worrier) Was also defeateCt

Para 10 : Irre ular Ex enditure;lifas-.49:.75ilitIchs:due..toydiversioaltisMadli,tind _

,partibipatiOnavA

"MitriC atterSce-inke

without having sufficient-linclget:m,-.00ncero-gclqeme and made ayment froar-ihe bads' •

Ladli scheme which resulted'irregulap expericiitn;ce without satie. On't„Of competent authonty

response to audit memo- no. 25 -:-.jared 16-01:12*1'; coply of the 11 c,...vas not satisfactorkeX

approval of Rs.4,91,603/•-•ofofficerezcpensesSth,,&ampetentautlj

Strutiny of recoids:.revealed7; '

various scheme i.e. - Produation- proinhirro .

Domestic Violence enlielp line, psi.

shelter homeS for destitUf&f,p0ggant tOi;ii

Helplines, Purchase of gcnerail. •

Sanklap Utsa.v-2009; Purct.m:s.e .i:•!f;

• -ayinent to

•s: .9orthase Of tir

Para 11 : Savings Rs.-7.26 Crore.tnidr

Savings in grant as pet icl'itomii;c:".'"Ktkv! •

estimated, anticipated and plamv-•!

both. Overall savings of R.p. 7 26 r +;:ti t,tc

.i•-grz;nts.

"tritt; indicate thafWeridittre eeulikbeincutied

;;"4 poor budge .;Or';'short inz:perfOrnageeter

"

:1.3.N7.cation of --.FfilTe,; , !,: s. Code .Read of AiC -

CRS`

, \to 4

... ‘'l. No .. ..41

2. '

jr.MO10 Nom'

_., 1t . udaet -.

.!_._

g

: ca.

, 04 .4M

223k it 20.1(1)()' Direction & Adnn.jSalaries :

25,00.000 •

U5790 ;

M 014 ..: 13ff2( I I Itt)(5)•-, ' .' •Sigs'N/1.' . "tt:.[

10,00,000 .3',27,9 t0 -A - . . , 4.6-4,..

;,!,te '4 , • - 4:ligi •

3. JJWCD • 2735.04(1)(2)(.19) -.....7 . Prograntecfpraritellild " •

1Ustice:(C1S8Y."::' • "

• 1,50,00,000 : 4.422155P00:;:(4. , .1 I 4,-,..s4 ...Al.:. 40;*" 1E

4 e ;:?a,944: :i.A * 4"4“ 4f -.••. ,,,,f,r4 4. MDSWB 2235" Ef-2:(1:xcym)

GIKto- DSW1374Ber . . 60,00,000. . .. ,...,...:2408",546 .7

5. MCRC: 3235:134.20)4:45): • 1 ciiiia..kightoiagipn. , :

1,50,00,000 -6•01 ;00x00 :-.- zost

6. 1CDSGI :: : • 2235.B,204(M) ICDS:"'(Qeriera11.$4 . are .i ' 'gel

, -:. ,

- 8,00,000 • . .4.71-: 5%4;000 ' , i, i I, :12:

7. MOPW 223.5131t1)(3plkl• " • ..: linplernekitionlf.: •••-• -

Protecticiii4ot,.' 1 Woinen:.frcini:•0:iniCStie

Violence ACC2603, ,

::. 45,00,000 • ,,i.:34;92,919 . •. _ .

,

I 0;074083 ;•.6

e.,,,, 4'......'

8. M-269 )5X1).• 2235 Bra(1( ... •

. . ,

Bhagidari:NiwaitkatNe in : .4 Sophil.D6el0fittient

19;00,00,000 e” ' ;; .: 9900000 - 2 • ,

::„

5;9 1;pcoocria

4,.. A[t: •Q• •••• 3 , _ai•

9. M-091 2235 872:(1)0:M. - State programme :

for sbeiall3i&;Otlysecitily: didadi,,antageii*ns,. :

!...opnioo '

i..h

.0707505 fl49 --q -./.

x#.,

4' 0 - - is -

...s., e 10, KISH 2236,B:-3M(0(6)Itt: " ",

Kislicifi;ShaktitajitiVOSSI "'Jan.?: z. •:-"I • — • 4"-"

:1",1 00 000- 7- A AI•1‘ '.' 2; ,,,, Oi

,q,

A ,4;1" •:::.: tst• ••,.:•• • ' •.y, . .):: - , . , :. '.'";',5:,..-T4tfiaI•Vf4., ' " ti. - L.-

According to. Riller69.46f0, s• • =ri:e4.grztrif/iiii the govt. as soon as these ate: fOic(011 Inc the last 4Y 9 should also hot be held in reserve:fOf 0,Skible futip-e Use.

Para 12 : Non-nroduction,ufireeOrde '

The following records for eciir.:;yeAr Now.2067 to March 201 • 1.Samajik Suvidha Sangain for qfle::is.iiljeot. 2.Statf engaged on Contract HaSi§:

3. Yearwise target and achievement of:4kit•sr:liethe.

:.• The above records ma3ibe.produced

. ;t tirte,"Of:ni.ixt audit.

• •

General

The general condition of accounts of .thei'llepartment of \Voiotia - -

Development (WCD), 1; Cackling Lane, K. G.:h 11/$1e;W:Delhi slit 0

period from 2001.08:to March 2011 were founddottielsatisfactons> „

observations Made in-the lospection Report "g5:,.5z,.. acre.cs+

The InsPection Report has been prepard400 batis of information ttist.4

furnished and made available by Department. Theta ige of the Accountant

General (Audit) Cleihi disclaims any cesponsibilitylo 4py mis-information and

non-information on the part of the. Dcpartmeneo Amen & Child Developmeh

(WCD), 1, Calmlog Lane, K. G. Marg, New Delhi',T4. , 0,001.