itn-etn 642612 the eu framework programme for research and … · 2016-10-28 ·...
TRANSCRIPT
VPH-CaSE:
Virtual Physiological Human – Cardiovascular Simulation and
Experimentation for Personalised Medical Devices
ITN-ETN 642612
Horizon 2020:
The EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation
MSCA-ITN-2014-ETN:
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks (ITN-ETN)
Work Package: WP5
Training
Deliverable: D5.2
Report on TA1
Version: 1.0
Date: 21-Dec-15
MSCA-ITN-2014-ETN:– 642612, VPH-CaSE
WP5: Training
D5.2: Report on TA1
Version: 1.0
Date: 21-Dec-15
Page 2 of 22
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
IST Project Num MSCA-ITN-2014-ETN: – 642612 Acronym VPH-CaSE
Full title Virtual Physiological Human –
Cardiovascular Simulation and Experimentation for Personalised Medical Devices
Project URL http://www.vph-case.eu
EU Project officer Sergio Mastropierro
Work package Number 5 Title Training
Deliverable Number 5.2 Title Report on TA1
Date of delivery Contractual 31/12/2015 Actual 21/12/2015
Status Version 1.0 Final
Nature Prototype Report Dissemination Other
Dissemination Level
Public (PU) Restricted to other Programme Participants (PP)
Consortium (CO) Restricted to specified group (RE)
Authors (Partner) John Fenner, Norman Powell, Gabriele Dubini
Responsible Author
Andrew Narracott Email [email protected]
Partner USFD Phone 0044 114 2713687
Abstract (for dissemination) This document reports the delivery and outcomes of Training Activity 1, held in Sheffield,
hosted by USFD on the 17th and 18th November, 2015. The document describes the
training activities and its participants. It reviews outcomes from the activities including
feedback from the VPH-CaSE Early Stage Researchers. These outcomes are summarised
in the context of the VPH-CaSE network-level training programme, as specified by the
VPH-CaSE Grant Agreement.
Keywords Training, Skills, Early Stage Researchers, PDP
The information in this document is provided as is and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is fit for any
particular purpose. The user thereof uses the information at its sole risk and liability. Its owner is not liable for damages
resulting from the use of erroneous or incomplete confidential information.
MSCA-ITN-2014-ETN:– 642612, VPH-CaSE
WP5: Training
D5.2: Report on TA1
Version: 1.0
Date: 21-Dec-15
Page 3 of 22
Version Log
Issue Date Version Author Change
19/11/2015 0.1 AJN Initial draft and structure
20/11/2015 0.2 AJN Added some content for sections 1-3
24/11/2015 0.3 JWF General edits and extra content to all sections
27/11/2015 0.4 AJN Refined content in later sections
03/12/2015 0.5 JWF Overall review and edits
10/12/2015 0.6 NP Incorporate NJP and GD minor corrections
21/12/2015 1.0 NP Submission Version
MSCA-ITN-2014-ETN:– 642612, VPH-CaSE
WP5: Training
D5.2: Report on TA1
Version: 1.0
Date: 21-Dec-15
Page 4 of 22
Contents
Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 5
1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 6
2 Agenda for training activity 1 ............................................................................................ 7
3 Detail of individual training sessions ................................................................................. 9
3.2 Concluding Remarks and Questionnaire ................................................................... 16
4 Analysis of feedback and impact for future training activities ........................................ 17
4.1 Reporting of feedback ............................................................................................... 17
4.2 Overall Feedback and Comments ............................................................................. 19
4.3 Discussion ................................................................................................................. 19
5 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................... 21
6 Appendix 1 : Ethics exam and responses ......................................................................... 22
MSCA-ITN-2014-ETN:– 642612, VPH-CaSE
WP5: Training
D5.2: Report on TA1
Version: 1.0
Date: 21-Dec-15
Page 5 of 22
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This document reports the delivery and outcomes of VPH-CaSE Training Activity 1, held in
Sheffield, hosted by USFD on the 17th and 18th November, 2015. This is the first Network
event in which the ESRs have participated since their recent recruitment, so this was an
opportunity to emphasise important Network priorities (Personal Development Plan, ethics
etc.) and promote Network cohesion. The document describes the nature of the training
activities, the participants and the outcomes from the activities including feedback from the
VPH-CaSE Early Stage Researchers.
This training activity is reported in the context of the skills requirements defined for the
VPH-CaSE Early Stage Researcher (ESR) cohort, previously reported in deliverable D5.1 :
Skill Requirements. In addition to the immediate outcomes from this training activity, this
event has addressed the important need to ensure all VPH-CaSE ESRs engage with the
opportunities offered by the network-level training to be delivered by VPH-CaSE. This has
been secured by a commitment to monitor ESR skills development through the Personal
career Development Plan (PDP), described in deliverable D5.1.
This report concludes with a summary of the outcomes from the training activity, providing
recommendations which will inform planning and implementation of the future network-level
training activities.
MSCA-ITN-2014-ETN:– 642612, VPH-CaSE
WP5: Training
D5.2: Report on TA1
Version: 1.0
Date: 21-Dec-15
Page 6 of 22
1 INTRODUCTION
The VPH-CaSE Marie Curie European Training Network delivers a network-wide training
programme to 14 Early Stage Researchers (ESRs) hosted in academic and industry centres
throughout Europe. The training programme is driven by a commitment to equip the ESR cohort
with skills as defined in in deliverable D5.1, which has been developed by the project Steering
Committee and reviewed by the Supervisory Board. Overall, 4 Training Activities are planned, and
their delivery schedule is reported in D5.1. This report focuses on Training Activity 1 which was
held in Sheffield from 17th – 18th November, 2015, hosted by USFD.
For reference, the description of planned activities for Training Activity 1 from deliverable D5.1 is
provided in table 1 below.
Table 1: Training Activity 1 : Intro event: preliminary skills, networking
Description: This event will take place over two days in
Sheffield, once all ESRs have been recruited to allow ESRs to
gain an understanding of their IRP topic prior to participation in
the event. The training activities will focus on complementary
skills, as ESRs will still be in the process of becoming familiar
with the technical requirements of their IRP. The event will
provide an opportunity for all ESRs to meet for the first time and
will promote network cohesion and interactions between
VPH-CaSE institutions. In particular, the event will provide
training in issues associated with ethical use of research data and
provide ESRs with information related to the management and
reporting requirements of VPH-CaSE, promoting understanding
of project management.
LTO will provide a case study: ‘What is it like to
operate as an SME?’
Training will be provided in the ethical use of clinical
data: STH research governance case study
Interactions will take place with USFD Industrial
Knowledge Forge event: local engagement with
Industry
Sheffield Healthcare Gateway (http://shg.sheffield.ac.uk/) will
provide a talk on commercialisation of research outputs, aspects
to consider when starting a research programme.
Primary skills addressed:
Communication
Skills/Personal Effectiveness
(Presentation,
Communication)
Research & Project
Management (Management,
Governance)
Career Management (Career
Planning)
Commercial Exploitation of
Results, Entrepreneurship
Section 2 and 3 of this report describe provision of the training event, whilst section 4 provides an
analysis of the outcomes of the event, including ESR feedback. Section 5 presents conclusions, and
looks ahead to the delivery of future training events. Reference documentation is provided in the
appendices.
MSCA-ITN-2014-ETN:– 642612, VPH-CaSE
WP5: Training
D5.2: Report on TA1
Version: 1.0
Date: 21-Dec-15
Page 7 of 22
2 AGENDA FOR TRAINING ACTIVITY 1
This section provides the participant list and agenda for Training Activity 1, with detail of the
implementation of each element of the agenda provided in section 3 of this report.
Participant list for Training Activity 1
Presenters: John Fenner Scientific Coordinator USFD JWF Andrew Narracott Scientific Coordinator USFD AJN Vanessa Diaz PI UCL VD Adrian Walker PI LTO AW John Atwood Consultant Your Care Connected JA Emma Nolan Commercial Assessment and
IP Management RIS, USFD EN
Prashant Verma Supervisory Board member STH PV Participants: Paolo Ferraiuoli ESR01 USFD PF Simone Ferrari ESR02 USFD SF Carlos Ledezma ESR05 UCL CL Mirko Bonfanti ESR06 UCL MB Susanna Migliori ESR07 POLIMI SM Ricardo Gómez Bardón ESR08 POLIMI RG Emila Badescu ESR09 CNRS EB Gerardo Kenny Rumindo ESR10 CNRS GR Massimiliano Mercuri ESR11 Therevna MM Simone Ambrogio ESR12 LTO SA Jeroen Feher ESR13 Ansys JF Benjamin Kappler ESR14 LifeTec BK
MSCA-ITN-2014-ETN:– 642612, VPH-CaSE
WP5: Training
D5.2: Report on TA1
Version: 1.0
Date: 21-Dec-15
Page 8 of 22
Agenda for Training Activity 1
Timing Ref Agenda Item Venue Resp
13:00 TA01-01
Introduction
Hosts
ESRs
RHH – Seminar Room 4
JWF, AJN
ESRs
14:00 TA01-02
Training and Skills
Introduction
Skills
Personnel Development Plan
RHH – Seminar Room 4 AJN
14:45 Coffee RHH – Seminar Room 4
15:00 TA01-03 Ethics RHH – Seminar Room 4 JWF, PV
15:45 TA01-04 Web/Newsletter/Dissemination RHH – Seminar Room 4 AJN/JWF
16:30 TA01-05 InKForge - Technical careers beyond academia RHH – F-floor Lecture Theatre 3 AW
JA
18:00 End of Day 1
09:00 TA01-06
Information Sessions:
Grant Agreement
Consortium and Partner Agreements
Management
A16, Pam Liversidge Building
NP,
JWF,
AJN
10:00 TA01-07
Healthcare Gateway:
Commercialisation of research; academic and industrial perspectives.
A16, Pam Liversidge Building SS, EN
11:00 Coffee A16, Pam Liversidge Building
11:15 TA01-08 Life as a Marie Curie Fellow A16, Pam Liversidge Building VD
12:00 TA01-09 Web/Newsletter/Dissemination A16, Pam Liversidge Building AJN/JWF
13:00 Lunch The Forum, Division Street
14:00 End of Day 2
MSCA-ITN-2014-ETN:– 642612, VPH-CaSE
WP5: Training
D5.2: Report on TA1
Version: 1.0
Date: 21-Dec-15
Page 9 of 22
3 DETAIL OF INDIVIDUAL TRAINING SESSIONS
This section provides detail of each of the training sessions outlined in the agenda provided in
section 2. A room was made available from 11:00 to allow ESRs to meet informally if they arrived
early for the training activity. All ESRs met for lunch together to encourage informal discussion
from 12:00 – 13:00 prior to the formal training activities.
3.1.1 Session name: TA01-1 : Introduction (Hosts and ESRs)
Session date/time: November 17th, 13:00 – 14:30
Attendees: All ESRs, JWF, AJN
Handed out: Agenda, TA01-1 slide handout, Grant Agreement, EC Brussels slides
ESR Activity: Personal presentation of ESR profiles
Information Received at the End of the Session: Slides of the ESR presentations
Description:
In this session (extended to 90 minutes from 13:00 to 14:30) JWF provided an overview of network
aims, objectives and activities from the perspective of the Training Activity hosts USFD in their
role as coordinator of the VPH-CaSE network. This included an introductory talk in which the
European Context of Marie Curie funding and VPH-CaSE were discussed, highlighting the
training components of the Network as well as the contractual responsibilities of all involved.
This was consolidated by distribution of a copy of the VPH-CaSE Grant Agreement and
printed copies of the slides from the ITN Information Day that were made available from the
Brussels meeting in April 2015. Towards the end of the session, the ESRs were invited to
stand and present their profile one at a time (they had been previously provided with a slide
template that was expected to be completed prior to the event). The ESRs were asked to present
for 3-4 minutes to provide an overview of their personal background and research history
(including overview of research projects undertaken during Masters/Undergraduate study) and a
brief summary of the aims, objectives and any preliminary results from their IRP. These were
presented in an orderly fashion, taking approximately 35 minutes in total. The session was
extended to allow all ESRs to present in full. JWF concluded by re-emphasising the expected
benefits and responsibilities associated with Marie-Curie funded training.
Key content communicated:
Structure of the consortium,
Clustering of Individual Research Projects (IRPs),
EC monitoring of project activity,
Importance of researcher skill development,
ESR responsibilities
Steering committee/supervisor responsibilities
Skills targeted : Communication Skills : Presentation, Communication, Research Management
MSCA-ITN-2014-ETN:– 642612, VPH-CaSE
WP5: Training
D5.2: Report on TA1
Version: 1.0
Date: 21-Dec-15
Page 10 of 22
3.1.2 Session name: TA01-2 : Training and Skills
Session date/time: November 17th, 14:30 – 15:00
Attendees: All ESRs, JWF, AJN
Handed out: TA01-2 slide handout, Personal Career Development Plan ESR summary
document, Blank templates for Table 1-3 of PDP
ESR Activity: Review/identify skills. Consider aspects of PDP.
Information Received at the End of the Session: Recommendations for skills to be added to the
skills list, such as…
(i) skills relating to marketing of a new device,
(ii) skills relating to use of particular tools,
(iii) recognition of viability in relation to manufacturing processes.
Description:
In this session (reduced to 30 minutes) AJN provided an overview of the network-wide training to
be delivered by VPH-CaSE and the role of network-wide and local training in relation to the ESR
skills profile and the Personal career Development Plan (PDP) to be developed by each ESR during
their IRP.
Two activities were undertaken. Firstly, ESRs were asked to review the ESR skills profile and
identify skills which were not clearly defined and relevant skills which were missing from the ESR
profile reported in the PDP summary document. Outcomes from this process are reported in
Section 4 of this report. Secondly, they were asked to review the blank templates for Table 1, 2 and
3 of the PDP and to start to consider how they would complete these. Future monitoring of these
tables is discussed at the end of this report.
Key Content Communicated:
Content of PDP ESR summary document,
Overview of ESR skills profile and review,
Interactions between local and network training,
Overview of upcoming Training Events (1, 2 and 3),
PDP goals and process
Skills targeted : Personal Effectiveness, Career Management
3.1.3 Session name: TA01-3 : Ethics
Session date/time: November 17th, 15:00 – 15:40
Attendees: All ESRs, JWF, AJN, PV, AW
Handed out: TA01-3 slide handout, Ethics deliverable D1.2 (with appendices
removed). Ethics summary. UK perspective - ethics example
ESR Activity: Ethics exam (10 minutes)
Information Received at the End of the Session: Ethics exam responses (see appendix)
Description: In this session JWF provided an overview of the ethical context of the
network and the responsibility of the ESRs to engage with ethical issues as part of their research
programme. The session opened with a brief introduction to Dr Verma (member of the VPH-
CaSE Ethics Review Board) who was present specifically to support the ethics component of
the Training Event. JWF proceeded to clarify the importance that the EC attaches to ethics,
MSCA-ITN-2014-ETN:– 642612, VPH-CaSE
WP5: Training
D5.2: Report on TA1
Version: 1.0
Date: 21-Dec-15
Page 11 of 22
both in respect of professional behaviour (e.g. plagiarism etc.) and in the context of research.
The specific strategies adopted by VPH-CaSE to address ethics were discussed, with
reference to both the ‘Ethical Self Assessment’ of the GA and the more recently submitted
deliverable D1.2 (‘Ethical Delivery of Documents’). The network’s general position on
consent, encryption/anonymisation of sensitive data and support for the 3Rs was highlighted,
followed by the roles of the Ethical Review Board and the VPH-CaSE ethical profiles
associated with each project. The ESRs then undertook a simple ethics test (a lightweight,
open book examination) followed by a review of each other’s responses (each ESR marked
his/her neighbour’s paper). A short discussion led by JWF clarified the correct responses. The
session concluded by reiterating that ethics is the responsibility of each ESR within the
network, to be reviewed with the supervisor throughout the whole of the project, assisted by
the appropriate IRP ethical profile and the Ethical Review Board.
Key Content Communicated:
EC perspective on ethics
VPH-CaSE strategy for ethics
Consent, encryption, anonymisation, 3Rs
Ethical Review Board
IRP ethical profile
Skills targeted : Research & Project Management (Management, Governance)
3.1.4 Session name: TA01-4 : Dissemination (Part 1)
Session date/time: November 17th, 15:40 – 16:20
Attendees: All ESRs, JWF, AJN, AW
Handed out: TA01-4 slide handout
ESR Activity: 10 minute video, introducing Open Access publication
Short activity in which each ESR chose to affiliate him/herself to a
preferred dissemination outlet - Web, YouTube/Webinar, Newsletter
Information Received at the End of the Session: Dissemination group allocation (see below)
MSCA-ITN-2014-ETN:– 642612, VPH-CaSE
WP5: Training
D5.2: Report on TA1
Version: 1.0
Date: 21-Dec-15
Page 12 of 22
Description:
In this session JWF provided an overview of the dissemination aspects of the network and the
importance of this for the profile of European research and the careers of the ESRs. The
presentation began with an introduction to EC policy on dissemination for Marie Curie
networks, making a distinction between professional dissemination and public
communication. This session was directed at the former and presented 4 principal
dissemination channels adopted by the Network - scientific publication/conferences, VPH-
CaSE website, YouTube/Webinars, newsletter. A brief overview of each was presented,
including a 10 minute video explaining Open Access publication. EC support for the latter
was emphasised, supporting opportunities for both Green and Gold routes. The role of
Therenva as an eventual translational outlet for VPH-CaSE research was also discussed. The
session closed with an activity in which the ESRs expressed their interest in supporting a
particular dissemination channel. The ESRs were asked to assign themselves to one of three
teams responsible for coordinating activity of the ESRs in each of the following areas over the next
12 month period: Web resources, Webinars/You Tube, Newsletter. These groupings are a natural
way to facilitate inter-centre liaison as they champion their respective dissemination activity
within the Network (subject to approval by the VPH-CaSE Steering Committee).
Key Concepts Communicated
Dissemination vs Public Communication
EC perspective on dissemination
VPH-CaSE dissemination channels - publication, web, YouTube/webinar, newsletter
Open Access (10 minute video - www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5rVH1KGBCY)
Skills targeted : Communication Skills, Research Management, Career Management
DisseminationTeams:
WEB YouTube/Webinar Newsletter
Team Web
Paolo Ferraiuoli
Carlos Ledezuna
Benjamin Kappler
Massimiliano Mercuri
Team YouTube/Webinar
Simone Ferrari
Jeroen Fehrer
Susanna Migliori
Emilia Badescu
Team Newsletter
Simone Amborgio
Mirko Bonfanti
G Kenny Rumindo
Ricardo Gomez
MSCA-ITN-2014-ETN:– 642612, VPH-CaSE
WP5: Training
D5.2: Report on TA1
Version: 1.0
Date: 21-Dec-15
Page 13 of 22
3.1.5 Session name: TA01-5 : InkForge careers session
Session date/time: November 17th, 16:30 – 18:00
Attendees: All ESRs, JWF, AJN, AW, JA
Handed out: N/A
ESR Activity: The ESRs were active in the question and answer sessions following each
of the presentations, along with external participants from outside the
network.
Information Received at the End of the Session: N/A
Description:
This session was organised in collaboration with InkForge
(https://www.shef.ac.uk/faculty/medicine-dentistry-health/thinkahead/inkforge) and provided career
perspectives from two speakers; Adrian Walker from VPH-CaSE Beneficiary Leeds Test Objects
and John Attwood (Healthcare consultant, YourCareConnected). The perspectives allowed the
ESRs to gain an understanding of careers beyond the academic sector and the opportunities and
challenges of working within these environments. The event was open to researchers beyond the
VPH-CaSE consortium, with the ESR numbers swollen by almost 10 additional PhD and
postdoctoral researchers.
Skills targeted : Career Planning
3.1.6 Session name: TA01-6 : Management
Session date/time: November 18th, 09:15 – 10:00
Attendees: All ESRs, AJN
Handed out: TA01-6 slide handout
ESR Activity: Impromptu test on principles of the Grant Agreement
Information Received at the End of the Session: N/A
Description:
In this session AJN provided an overview of the management aspects of the network and the
relationship between the effort of the ESRs, the reporting of project progress and the terms of the
EC Grant Agreement.
Key Content Communicated:
Implications of the VPH-CaSE Grant Agreement
Workpackage structure, deliverables and milestones
Reporting obligations for the project
Additional issues addressed by Consortium Agreement
IP issues and Open Access
Skills targeted : Research & Project Management (Management, Governance)
MSCA-ITN-2014-ETN:– 642612, VPH-CaSE
WP5: Training
D5.2: Report on TA1
Version: 1.0
Date: 21-Dec-15
Page 14 of 22
3.1.7 Session name: TA01-7 : Commercialisation of Research
Session date/time: November 18th, 10:30 – 11:15
Attendees: All ESRs, JWF, AJN, EN
Handed out: Business Canvas
ESR Activity: 3 groups discussing Business Canvas concepts
Information Received at the End of the Session: Business Canvas responses from the ESRs
Description:
In this session Emma Nolan (Research and Innovation Services, USFD) provided an overview of
issues related to commercialisation of research and protection of research outcomes, including
Intellectual Property. This was illustrated with reference to a case study from Liverpool John
Moores University which covered issues including financing for prototype production. The
Business Canvas was promoted as an effective medium for considering commercialisation issues
and the ESRs were invited to break into 3 groups of 4 to examine the Business Canvas in the
context of their own research within VPH-CaSE. This required discussion of a number of topics;
Key Partners, Key Activities, Key Resources, Value Propositions, Customer Relationships,
Channels, Customer Segments, Cost Structure and Revenue Streams.
3.1.7.1 Key Content Communicated:
Commercialisation
Intellectual property
Collaboration
Business concepts as illustrated by the Business Canvas
Skills targeted : Commercial Exploitation of Results, Entrepreneurship
3.1.8 Session name: TA01-8 : Life as a Marie Curie Fellow
Session date/time: November 18th, 11:15 – 12:00
Attendees: All ESRs, JWF, AJN, VD
Handed out: N/A
ESR Activity: Question and answer session at the end of the presentation
Information Received at the End of the Session: N/A
Description:
In this session Dr Vanessa Diaz from VPH-CaSE Beneficiary UCL provided an overview of her
career history with reference to her experience as a Marie Curie Fellow and as coordinator of the
MeDDiCA Marie Curie ITN and head of the MUSE research group at UCL. This included
discussion of the challenges of the academic research environment and the opportunities awarded to
ESRs through Marie Curie actions to support development of their personal career profile. The
ESRs enthusiastically engaged with Dr Diaz during a Q&A session following her talk.
Skills targeted : Personal Effectiveness, Research Management, Career Management
MSCA-ITN-2014-ETN:– 642612, VPH-CaSE
WP5: Training
D5.2: Report on TA1
Version: 1.0
Date: 21-Dec-15
Page 15 of 22
3.1.9 Session name: TA01-9 : Dissemination (Part 2) - outreach
Session date/time: November 18th, 12:00 – 13:00
Attendees: All ESRs, JWF, AJN
Handed out: TA01-9 slide handout
ESR Activity: Brainstorming breakout session (3 groups) to consider innovative ways
to communicate the science of VPH-CaSE IRPs to the public
Information Received at the End of the Session: Notes on possible outreach activities (see below)
Description:
In this session JWF provided an insight into the importance of outreach activities to enhance
the impact of EC-funded research. The session began by reiterating the EC's policy on
dissemination, making a distinction between professional dissemination and public
communication. This session was directed at the latter and emphasised the need to 'think
outside the box' when promoting public understanding of science. JWF provided several
examples that had successfully delivered public outreach in the past, highlighting how
interactive elements can help to capture the general public's scientific imagination (eg. the
use of Lego, mock-ups of medical equipment, etc.). It was also highlighted that it is important
to choose a clear focus for the activities so that visitors leave with a clear message. As a
vehicle for discussion, two ESRs (already prepared) contrasted the scientific dissemination of
complex flow by traditional scientific methods with an informative but interactive alternative
suitable for the general public and children. This was used to initiate discussion in 3 groups,
considering inventive ways in which the topic of each IRP could be communicated to society.
VPH-CaSE has already identified several venues at which such outreach activities could be
exercised (Cafe Scientifique, European Researchers night, etc.) and the ESRs were
OutreachReporting back…
• Group 1
• Group 2
• Group 3
IDEAS:
Toy gun for vortex generator with transparent case
Visits of undergraduate students to the lab – prototypes to play with.
Ring vortex generator
Heart and valve model (physical, pump fluid between tanks)
Aneursym model (cut-tube & balloon) and dedicated app.
Single image 2D; pair of images 3D
Tube simulating arteries
Simulating action potentials with sounds
Phantoms with 2 objects (small/big) imaged with U/S probes; consider transition between objects as a dilation
MSCA-ITN-2014-ETN:– 642612, VPH-CaSE
WP5: Training
D5.2: Report on TA1
Version: 1.0
Date: 21-Dec-15
Page 16 of 22
encouraged to report to their supervisors and develop their ideas for outreach further.
Key Concepts Communicated:
Dissemination vs Outreach
Obligations to promote project outcomes as part of Grant Agreement
Outreach as a vehicle to develop researcher skills
Outreach opportunities - schools, public events, Cafe Scientifique etc.
Outreach strategies - engaging activities, public interaction
Examples of outreach (Sheffield)
Breakout discussion group to consider outreach strategies for each IRP
Skills targeted : Communication, Project Management
3.2 Concluding Remarks and Questionnaire
The training activity concluded with a summary from JWF, providing an overview of the key
points covered by the two days of the training session. These focussed on the responsibilities
of the ESRs in relation to ethical issues associated with their Individual Research Projects,
the monitoring of their Personal career Development Plan (PDP) throughout the period of
VPH-CaSE activity, and consideration of dissemination/outreach activities, with an emphasis
in all cases on discussion with their respective supervisors. Finally, the ESRs were asked to
complete a Feedback Questionnaire, designed to solicit reflective opinions about the Training
Activity they had just undertaken. The results are presented below (Section 4).
Following the end of the formal meeting all ESRs joined for lunch to allow further informal
networking and discussion of issues related to development of IRPs and collaboration
between VPH-CaSE ESRs.
MSCA-ITN-2014-ETN:– 642612, VPH-CaSE
WP5: Training
D5.2: Report on TA1
Version: 1.0
Date: 21-Dec-15
Page 17 of 22
4 ANALYSIS OF FEEDBACK AND IMPACT FOR FUTURE TRAINING ACTIVITIES
4.1 Reporting of feedback
The following section reviews the general feedback received from the ESRs regarding the
training sessions, collected at the end of the training event. For each element the ESRs were
asked to provide a score out of 5 (1 – lowest; 5-highest) and given the opportunity to provide
comments. The cumulative scores were ranked to ascertain relative interest in each session
(1- top rank; 9-bottom rank) and this is also reported below.
TA01-01: Introduction and ESR Profiles Rated: 3.9/5 Rank: 5/9
Feedback was sought relating to the ESR profile presentations. In general the aim of the
session was well received and the ESRs valued the opportunity to understand the context of
other research within the network. The short time allocated to the presentations, particularly
the focus of the ESR projects was highlighted as a shortcoming, with comments suggesting
that there could have been more time allowed for discussion and interaction between ESRs.
TA01-02: Training and Skills Rated: 3.6/5 Rank: 8/9
Feedback was supportive of the content of the session, suggesting that the material was clear
and well explained. It was mentioned that there was limited time to consider all aspects of
skills development within the session itself. The challenge of considering the relevance of
skills development to career development so early within the network activity was
highlighted. It was identified that the ESRs are keen to be made aware of training
opportunities within the network, including availability of local training within other centres.
ESRs identified the following areas where additional skills development might be required:
Skills with specific software packages, i.e. Matlab, ANSYS etc.
Skills in understanding manufacturing requirements for medical devices (cost,
feasibility, etc.)
TA01-03: Ethics Rated: 4/5 Rank: 4/9
The importance of ethics was acknowledged in ESR feedback comments, with particular
reference to the fact that this topic had not been considered by ESRs prior to the training
event. The ethics exam was highlighted as useful to ensure ESRs had understood the ethical
context of the network. Suggestions for improving the training included the use of specific
‘real world’ examples and allowing more time for discussion. The outcomes of the ‘ethics
exam’ are reported in Appendix 6. This highlighted that…
The ESRs widely acknowledged the importance of anonymisation, encryption and the
3Rs as Network policy
There was confusion by some ESRs about specific aspects of ethical relevance (eg.
dual/secondary use, consent) in the context of their VPH-CaSE projects
MSCA-ITN-2014-ETN:– 642612, VPH-CaSE
WP5: Training
D5.2: Report on TA1
Version: 1.0
Date: 21-Dec-15
Page 18 of 22
The ESRs acknowledged the importance of ethics discussion with their supervisors
and the Ethics Review Board, both of which are informed by the project specific
ethics profiles
TA01-04: Dissemination (1) Rated: 3.8/5 Rank: 6/9
ESR comments and feedback were supportive of the content of the session and the examples
provided were considered helpful in illustrating its importance and mechanisms to achieve
dissemination of results. It was suggested that more concrete guidance is required to assist
the ESRs in taking forward activities within each dissemination area and that methods of
communication between the members of each team need to be clarified.
TA01-05: InKForge Rated: 4.1/5 Rank: 3/9
The feedback from ESRs was very positive overall, with particular focus on the benefits of
providing an industrial perspective on research and career progression. The presentations of
both invited speakers were well received. Discussion following the talks also provided
opportunities for some reference to topics discussed during the ESR training delivered in
TA01-02, with the importance of skills relating to manufacturing processes highlighted in the
context of industrial R&D.
TA01-06: Management Rated: 3.6/5 Rank: 8/9
Considering the dryness of the topic, this session was received reasonably well by the ESRs
and the mix of feedback reflected the challenges of presenting the scope of the Grant
Agreement (and its implications for ESRs) in a general training session. Some ESRs
suggested that the detail of the Grant Agreement could have been discussed in greater depth,
others found the content somewhat repetitive as similar topics had been discussed more
generally during previous sessions.
TA01-07: Commercialisation Rated: 3.8/5 Rank: 6/9
ESR feedback was positive, particularly in relation to the importance of understanding IP
protection and the relationship between this and the research projects. Some ESRs felt there
was not enough time to fully explore the Business Canvas exercise and that further guidance
to complete the Business Canvas would be helpful.
TA01-08: Life as a Marie Curie Fellow Rated: 4.5/5 Rank: 1/9
This talk was ranked as the favourite session, with a number of ESRs providing additional
supportive comments. These focussed on the personal nature of the presentation providing a
direct perspective from the experience of a Marie Curie Fellow and providing insight into the
challenges and rewards of an academic research career.
MSCA-ITN-2014-ETN:– 642612, VPH-CaSE
WP5: Training
D5.2: Report on TA1
Version: 1.0
Date: 21-Dec-15
Page 19 of 22
TA01-09: Dissemination (2) – outreach Rated: 4.3/5 Rank: 2/9
This session was well received, with the ESRs valuing the opportunity to develop ideas for
outreach within a group environment. Suggestions for improvement included allowing more
time for discussion and more opportunity for development of ideas.
4.2 Overall Feedback and Comments
In addition to feedback on specific training elements the ESRs provided general feedback on
the Training Activity as a whole. From these comments it is clear that they appreciated
participation in this first Training Activity and recognised the opportunity that this provided
to promote networking and collaboration between the ESRs in the context of their IRPs.
Recommendations were made to make printed materials available electronically, with the
suggestion that this could be facilitated through the project website, providing a focus for
further ESR interaction. Looking ahead to production of literature reviews across the network
(an early requirement of a PhD programme in most academic centres), it was suggested that
the work could be collected and edited to create a coherent whole, either published as a
review paper for dissemination purposes or compiled as a book. It was clear that the ESRs
sought further interaction in many cases, and that they would have welcomed further time
dedicated to each activity, with the suggestion that the Training Activity as a whole could
have been extended to a longer duration (i.e. two full days activity).
4.3 Discussion
In general the implementation and delivery of Training Activity 1 can be considered a
success. There were some minor issues relating to logistics or over-running of some sessions,
requiring slight changes to the planned timetable for the training elements. All 12
participants were able to attend the activities as planned in the agenda.
If the success of the Training Activity is measured by the ESR feedback, then it is
encouraging to note that all training elements received an average score of at least 3.6 and the
only element that received a lesser score came from an individual in respect of the InkForge
career talk; notably this received an average high score of 4.1. The ranking of the elements in
terms of ESR feedback suggests the more personal and interactive elements of training were
most positively received (Marie Curie Fellow, Dissemination 2 and InkForge). We are very
encouraged that the Ethics training was ranked highly by the ESRs (average score 4.0, rank
4/9) and that the ESR feedback recognises the importance of this element in relation to their
research projects. Management aspects in terms of the description of the training programme
and wider administration were not ranked so highly. This is unsurprising due to its non-
scientific content and the naturally less interactive character of this topic. However, it was
important that a sufficient level of detail was communicated to the ESRs at the start of their
training programme because it provides a useful reference against which to resolve future
MSCA-ITN-2014-ETN:– 642612, VPH-CaSE
WP5: Training
D5.2: Report on TA1
Version: 1.0
Date: 21-Dec-15
Page 20 of 22
issues. Also, in the case of the PDP, it outlines what is expected of the ESRs as their training
evolves over the course of the project.
A general observation from ESR feedback was that more time was requested for some
activities, although this could only have been accommodated by extension of the event. The
delivered timetable attempted to balance formal sessions with accommodation and travel
requirements, dissemination of information to ESRs and reasonable costs for the ESR
budgets. However, the natural enthusiasm of the ESRs should be encouraged, capitalising on
their motivations and encouraging them to invest further effort in these activities to ensure
that they continue to engage with the many aspects of the research programme (skills
monitoring, IP issues, ethics review, PDP) when they return to their host institutions. It is
appropriate that the Training Activity should be followed by e-mails to the ESRs and contact
with supervisors. This will promote continued monitoring of ESR engagement with the
research, outreach, ethics and PDP, and would also involve the VPH-CaSE Steering
Committee, promoting consolidation of outcomes from Training Activity 1.
MSCA-ITN-2014-ETN:– 642612, VPH-CaSE
WP5: Training
D5.2: Report on TA1
Version: 1.0
Date: 21-Dec-15
Page 21 of 22
5 CONCLUSIONS
Following the successful delivery of VPH-CaSE Training Activity 1, the following actions
are planned to enhance delivery of future events in the VPH-CaSE network-wide training
programme;
This report will be shared with the project Steering Committee and Supervisory Board
and used to inform the decisions of the Working Group responsible for design and
delivery of each of the future VPH-CaSE Training Activities
Where ESR feedback is used to inform the design of future activities (e.g. open
sessions to allow development of collaborative IRP activities) this will be highlighted
in advance, to encourage ESR engagement with the training events
Electronic copies of supporting materials will be made available to both ESRs and
their supervisors to inform continued development of the Personal career
Development Plan (PDP) for each ESR
In particular, it is noted that the enthusiasm of the ESRs to participate in longer training
activities will be well served by Training Activities 2, 3 and 4 which are all scheduled to take
place over a full week. The timing of these activities also means that all ESRs will be well
engaged with the focus of their IRP and will be better placed to develop concrete plans for
collaborative research activities.
MSCA-ITN-2014-ETN:– 642612, VPH-CaSE
WP5: Training
D5.2: Report on TA1
Version: 1.0
Date: 21-Dec-15
Page 22 of 22
6 APPENDIX 1 : ETHICS EXAM AND RESPONSES
ETHICS QUESTIONS No. of Correct Answers1
1 Which two processes will be enacted in the event of sensitive data transfer between parties within the Network?
**********
2 What is the code for the EU legislation that deals with data protection? ***********
3 What is the difference between ‘Dual Use’ and ‘Secondary Use’ data? *******
4 Which one of the following correctly describes the position between you and your supervisor…
As an ESR I might discuss my project and its ethical responsibilities with my supervisor
As an ESR I will discuss my project and its ethical responsibilities with my supervisor
As an ESR I will not discuss my project and its ethical responsibilities with my supervisor
***********
5 In our research domain, what is meant by the 3Rs and what do they refer to? **********
6 To what extent does your project rely on the use of human tissue? ***********
7 Do you foresee ethical issues presenting an impediment to the progress of your project in the next 3 years? If so, what will you do about it?
********
8 What is the purpose of the ethical profile contained within the ‘Ethics Delivery of Documents’?
*********
9 What is the relevance of ‘informed consent’ in the context of research in the hospital environment?
********
10 The Ethics Review Board has ultimate authority within the Network to sanction the continuation or cessation of my research. True or false?
*********
Answers:
1. Encryption/anonymization 6. No use of human biological tissue in project
2. EU directive 95/46/EC 7. If ethical issues exist, resolve by discussing with supervisor and Ethical Review Board
3. Dual – reused for harmful purposes
Secondary – used outside the original consent
8. A snapshot of IRP ethical status. Review/update at regular intervals
4. (b) 9. Permission is received from the research participant and he/she understands the implications
5. Replace, Reduce, Refine 10. True
1 A total of 11 completed ethics exam sheets were recovered from the VPH-CaSE ESR cohort