item #6 312 agro

25
Case # 625F Significance & Compatibility Review 312 Argo Presented By: Jason Lutz Community Development Services Director City Council Meeting Agenda Item #6 June 27, 2016

Upload: marian-vargas-mendoza

Post on 19-Jan-2017

41 views

Category:

Government & Nonprofit


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Item #6   312 Agro

Case # 625FSignificance & Compatibility

Review312 Argo

Presented By: Jason LutzCommunity Development Services Director

City Council MeetingAgenda Item #6June 27, 2016

Page 2: Item #6   312 Agro

CASE NO. 625F Consider a request of Susan Flores, owner, forthe significance and compatibility review of theproposed main structure located at 312 Argo Aveunder Demolition Review Ordinance No. 1860(April 12, 2010) to:

Demolish/encapsulate 75% of the existing roof

Demolish 67% of the existing exterior facing walls

Demolish 56% of the existing street facing façadeof the main structure

Page 3: Item #6   312 Agro

SUMMARY Remodel existing duplex

Convert to Single-family residence

Page 4: Item #6   312 Agro

4

BACKGROUND

Zoned SF-B South side of Argo, between Imlay &

Arbutus Duplex

existing non-conforming use

Page 5: Item #6   312 Agro

5

Page 6: Item #6   312 Agro

6

LOT COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSEDLot Area 7,500 7,500Main House Footprint 1,404 1,880Front Porch 108 275Side Porch 1Side Porch 2Rear Porch 20 614Garage Footprint 520 520Carport FootprintShed(s) FootprintBreezewaysCovered Patio StructureOther Accessory StructuresLot Coverage / Lot Area 2,052 / 7,500 2,847 / 7,500Total Lot Coverage (Max 40%) 27% 38%

Page 7: Item #6   312 Agro

7

FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) EXISTING PROPOSEDLot Area 7,500 7,500Main House 1st Floor 1,404 1,880Main House 2nd Floor 975Garage 1st Floor 520 520Garage 2nd Floor

Other Structures

FAR / Lot Area 1,924 / 7,500 3,375 / 7,500

Total FAR (45% or max 50% with bonuses) 26% 45%

Page 8: Item #6   312 Agro

8

POLICY ANALYSIS

27’-11” in height (max allowed 30’) Compliance with all regulations:

Setbacks Height Looming standards No variances required/requested

Page 9: Item #6   312 Agro

9

POLICY ANALYSIS

Exterior hardie siding hardie shake shingles

Asphalt shingle roof

Page 10: Item #6   312 Agro

10

EXISTING ELEVATION & SITE PLAN

Page 11: Item #6   312 Agro

11

PROPOSED SITE PLAN

Page 12: Item #6   312 Agro

12

FRONT ELEVATION

Page 13: Item #6   312 Agro

13

REAR ELEVATION

Page 14: Item #6   312 Agro

14

RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION

Page 15: Item #6   312 Agro

15

LEFT SIDE ELEVATION

Page 16: Item #6   312 Agro

16

RENDERINGS

Page 17: Item #6   312 Agro

17

RENDERINGS

Page 18: Item #6   312 Agro

18

RENDERINGS

Page 19: Item #6   312 Agro

19

EXISTING STREETSCAPE

Page 20: Item #6   312 Agro

20

PROPOSED STREETSCAPE

Page 21: Item #6   312 Agro

21

ARB RECOMMENDATION

ARB Review – June 21, 2016

No significance in existing structure

Replacement structure is compatible

Approved with conditions

Page 22: Item #6   312 Agro

22

ARB CONDITIONS

Screen A/C units (at front of the home)

with vegetation

or a screening fence

Page 23: Item #6   312 Agro

23

ARB CONDITIONS

Page 24: Item #6   312 Agro

24

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Postcards mailed (200-foot)

Notice posted on City website

Sign posted on property

Responses received:

Support: (5)

Oppose: (0)

Page 25: Item #6   312 Agro

QUESTIONS?