is migration good for development? how could you even ask? lant pritchett harvard kennedy school...
TRANSCRIPT
Is Migration Good for Development?
How Could You Even Ask?Lant Pritchett
Harvard Kennedy SchoolWellesley College
April 30, 2008
Is Migration Good for Development?
• Ideas and their evolution: Marx and Foucault• Spatial Based versus People Based thinking—
why does dirt matter in theories of justice?• The movement of people leads to development
gains orders of magnitude larger than anything else on the agenda
• For some places mobility may be the only development agenda
• Ideas and their evolution: Crazy, Crazy, Crazy, Obvious
The world that was lost in 1914
He could secure forthwith, if he wished it, cheap and comfortable means of transit to any country or climate without passport or other formality, could dispatch his servant to the neighboring office of a bank for such supply of the precious metals as might seem convenient, and could then proceed abroad to foreign quarters, without knowledge of their religion, language, or customs, bearing coined wealth upon his person, and would consider himself greatly aggrieved and much surprised at the least interference.
JM Keynes
The “second globalization” as farce
Hegel remarks somewhere that all great world-historic facts and personages appear, so to speak, twice. He forgot to add: the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce. …Men make their own history, but they do not make it as they please; they do not make it under self-selected circumstances, but under circumstances existing already, given and transmitted from the past. The tradition of all dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brains of the living.
Karl Marx, remarks somewhere
Citations: A battle the French do win (finally)
140446
124255
73038
424464172833171
9887
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
Citations
Foucault
Bourdieu
Becker
Derrida
Friedman
Samuelson
Pritchett
Source: my calculations with “Publish or Perish”
Deconstruction, the most powerful idea of your time…
• There is no “reason” or “discourse” or “truth” there is just power
• Power socially constructs reality such that the agenda is deeply controlled without explicit repressions—it is “common sense”
• “Deconstruction” is the subversion of the socially constructions of established discourse
• So, where do we look for overwhelming power? Not to controversy but for silence…what opposes the truly powerful is not controversial but just plain crazy
…has yet to tackle nationalism the most powerful idea of my time…
• God is dead
• All “..isms” are mortally wounded (e.g. racism, sexism, sexualism)
• “Truth” and “Reason” have retreated into scare quotes
And the “imagined communities” that are “nations” are all that is left to believe in
Simple economics—what is the “price equivalent” of a quota (say, for shoes)
P*
p*(1+τ)
Demand
Supply
Econometrics of wage gaps
The wage gap between the average wage in USA (“a”) and the average wage in Peru (“d”) combines differences in average personal characteristics (X) and place based productivity
What is the wage gap of observationally equivalent workers?
Compare workers born in Peru, educated for X years in Peru, working in Peru (d’) versus workers with the same characteristics (years of education, sex, age, residence) in the USA (c’).
The Place Premium (first cut):Same worker, different wages
Estimated wage differences of observationally equivalent low skill workers
is P$15,000 a year
Simple arithmetic for 35 year old, male, urban, formal sector, 9 years of schooling:
Wage in Haiti: 80 cents/hrWage in USA (o.e.): $8.25 /hrAnnual hours 8hrs/day, 22/days
month, 12 months year:(8.25-.80)*(8*22*12)=$15,738Average (of 42 countries):Wage in foreign: $2.53Wage in USA: $9.83Annual wage gap: $15,411
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
Annu
al ean
rings
(in PP
P)
In home
In USA
Tricky problem: Peruvians in US are not here by chance, they are here by
choice and are self-selected
Around any given slice through the wage profiles on observables there is a distribution of wages based on unobserved (to the econometrician) characteristics that affect wages in the home country—if workers are “positively selected” then the mean-mean (peak to peak) comparison overstates the wage gain
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Kern
el
densi
ty
0 5 10 15Component plus residual from ln(wage) regression
USA born, USA res, USA educ IND born, IND res, IND educ
IND born, USA res, USA educ IND born, USA res, IND educ
IndiaCompares means
Could compare to otherpercentile of the home distribution of unobservables,e.g. 70th
Distribution of the unobserved component on wages (residuals) in home for migrants and non-
migrants: Mexico0.
00.
20.
40.
60.
8K
ern
el d
ensi
ty
0 2 4 6 8 10ln(wage)
Migrant in home Non-migrant in home
Mean migrant at 53rd
Percentile of non-migrants
• The gain from a lifetime of micro credit is the same as 2.4 weeks working in the USA
• Total annual gain to Grameen Bank borrowers (around) $30 million
• If I get 3,000 additional Bangladeshi workers into the US, do I get a Nobel Peace Prize?
0.0
2000.0
4000.0
6000.0
8000.0
10000.0
12000.0
14000.0
Annual gain,micro-credit
Monthly gain,migration
Net presentValue, lifetimeof micro-credit
Annual gain,migration
PPP
$
Debt Relief…
• Total foregone payments due to HIPC debt relief in Africa—about 2.5 billion (in 2005)
• About 150,000 Africans to the US--.1 percent of the labor force, about 1 percent of monthly gross job growth, about one (good) months net job growth
• If a labor mobility activist accomplishes that do they get to sing at the Super Bowl?
[Picture of Bono here]
From the top of the cliff at the borders that faces labor you cannot see the
gains from goods or capital
65000
65 1090
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
Complete liberalizationlabor mobility
Complete equalizatoinMPK
Complete liberalizationof goods markets, todeveloping countries
Wel
fare
gai
ns, i
n bi
llion
s $
Stand the question on its head…
Not “Is Migration Good for Development?” but, since labor mobility is so good for proper, people based, measures of development why is there so much talk about things that have gains that are so much smaller?
(Hint: It has something to do with power)
Let’s talk justice, Rawlsian style
…including the use of coercion to stop people from crossing borders to carry out mutually beneficial economic transactions?
Would anyone, behind a “veil of ignorance” about where they would be born agree to this distribution?
Your (USA) tax dollars at work
Good thing we prevented that…
Total Number of births IMR
Annual excess deaths (over OECD IMR)
Developing Countries 122,266,000 51 5,624,236
Least Developed 29,076,000 84 2,297,004
India 27,119,000 54 1,328,831
I have never heard that there are 1.3 million “missing Indians”
Gender gaps and nationality gaps
Gender gap, Pakistani boysversus Pakistanigirls
Nationality gap, Pakistani boys versus Rich countrygirls
But what about its affect on “us(a)”?
• Depends on how you view the sources of cross-national differences in productivity of workers with the same human capital?– Is it resources (e.g. Kuwait?)– Is it capital per worker?– Is it “A” (factor productivity)?
• If it is A then it is possible that supply creates its own demand and the net impact on domestic workers is very small—consistent with all of the evidence
Who drove down worker wages?“When after all. It was you and me”
Why am I ringing up my own purchases? (with lots of capitaland technology?
Why am I shovelingown snow (with lots of capital?)
Attitudes towards Interracial Marriage in the US
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1958
1968
1972
1978
1983
1991
1994
1997
2002
2003
2004
2007
(Jun
e)
2007
(Sep
t)YearPerc
en
tag
e o
f P
op
ula
tion
Percentage of PopulationApproving
Shift in ideas, silly, controversial, progressive, then obvious
1992
LA riots spurred by tape of Rodney King beating
1963
MLK’s March on Washington
Barack Obama runs for President
of the United States
MLK assassinated
33% increase in approval over 4 years
Crazy, crazy, crazy…hero