lant pritchett november 2010

36
Graphs of “Capability Traps” for the ICRG based “Quality of Government” for each country of bottom 43 plus countries overall Lant Pritchett November 2010

Upload: gianna

Post on 19-Mar-2016

50 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Graphs of “Capability Traps” for the ICRG based “Quality of Government” for each country of bottom 43 plus countries overall. Lant Pritchett November 2010. Description of data. Based on ICRG data, three variables to form a “quality of Government” variable. Description of Graphs. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Lant Pritchett November 2010

Graphs of “Capability Traps”for the ICRG based “Quality of

Government” for each country of bottom 43 plus countries overall

Lant PritchettNovember 2010

Page 2: Lant Pritchett November 2010

Description of data

• Based on ICRG data, three variables to form a “quality of Government” variable

Page 3: Lant Pritchett November 2010

Description of Graphs• The data are for the most recent year of the indicator from the

previous sources (each green dot is a country observation, the chosen country is labeled at its observation and four countries are highlighted: Somalia, Singapore, India and Costa Rica.

• There are horizontal lines at each indicator going backward for Somalia (the minimum) and forward from Singapore (the maximum) and across the graph at the overall cross-national median and a vertical line at 2033 (25 years from the data).

• The “maximum historical trend” is the linear extrapolation back from the current level to Somalia’s level of the indicator (the minimum possible) at the country’s date of independence.

• In addition there are various scenarios illustrated, depending on the available data.

Page 4: Lant Pritchett November 2010

Four Scenarios• “Maximum historical trend” which is the “Value of

Somalia at independence to observed value today” growth rate extrapolated into the future

• The “fastest 20” extrapolates the growth rate of the fastest 20 countries in the data—which are also just based on assumptions, not really actual time series (and so overestimates growth rates for those recently independent countries)

• Country’s own actual average• Average of all countries

Page 5: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 6: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 7: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 8: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 9: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 10: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 11: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 12: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 13: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 14: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 15: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 16: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 17: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 18: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 19: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 20: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 21: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 22: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 23: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 24: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 25: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 26: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 27: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 28: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 29: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 30: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 31: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 32: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 33: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 34: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 35: Lant Pritchett November 2010
Page 36: Lant Pritchett November 2010