irrigation management and solutions to cope with agricultural drought in bulgaria

1
IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT AND SOLUTIONS TO COPE WITH AGRICULTURAL DROUGHT IN BULGARIA Z. Popova*, М. Ivanova*, K. Doneva*, M. Kercheva*, L.S.Pereira**, V.Alexandrov***, P. Alexandrova* AGU Fall Meeting 3-7 December 2012, San Francisco, California *N. Poushkarov Institute of Soil Science, Agrotechnology and Plant Protection-ISSAPPNP, 7 Shosse Bankya Str., 1080 Sofia, Bulgaria ([email protected] ); **CEER-Biosystems Engineering, Institute of Agronomy, Technical University of Lisbon, Tapada de Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal *** National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology- NIMH, 66 Tsarigradsko chaussee Blvd., 1784 Sofia The objective of this study is to quantify the impact of climate variability, including drought, on agricultural productivity and irrigation requirements in Bulgaria using simulation model WinISAREG for maize crop and seasonal SPI2 “July-Aug” for the period 1951-2004. Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of Drought Management Center for South East Europe Project, Contract no. SEE/A/091/2.2/X, South East Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme co-funded by the European Union, for implementation and dissemination of our studies’ results on crop vulnerability to droughts and irrigation management in Bulgaria. Materials and methods: Climate -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 a) -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 b) Fig.1 .Evolution of High Peak Season (July-Aug) SPI2 at: a) Sofia and b) Plovdiv, 1951-2004. Soil 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 M ay June July August Septem ber m onth sum ofprecipitation (m m) a) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 M ay June July August Septem ber m onth sum ofprecipitation (m m) b) Crop Maize was selected as a typical summer crop. Crop coefficients Kc, water depletion fraction for no stress p and the yield response factor Ky (Allen et al., 1998) were calibrated and validated using detailed independent datasets relative to long term experiments with late and semi - early maize varieties carried out under different irrigation schedules in Tsalapitsa, Plovdiv, Pustren and Zora, Stara Zagora, and Bojurishte, Sofia field. Simulation model The model was previously validated for maize hybrids of different sensitivity to water stress on soils of small, medium and large total available water (TAW) in various locations of Bulgaria (Popova et al., 2006; Popova, 2008; Popova and Pereira, 2010; Ivanova and Popova, 2011). Fig.3 Net irrigation requirements (NIRs) probability of exceedance curves relative to soil groups of small, medium and large total available water (TAW) at: a) Sofia field; b) Plovdiv, South Bulgaria, maize, 1951-2004. a) Fig.8 Relationships between seasonal SPI2 “July-Aug” (X-axis) and relative yield decrease of rainfed maize RYD with Ky=1.6 (Y-axis) at: a) Plovdiv and b) Pleven; soils of large TAW (180 mm m -1 ), late maize hybrids. Fig.9 Map of economical SPI2 “July-Aug” threshold, under which soil moisture deficit leads to severe impacts on yield losses for rainfed maize, Bulgaria. Results from Table 3, Soil map and Map of TAW of the soils are used for mapping the SPI2 “July-Aug” threshold. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1993 2000 1952 1962 1965 1988 2001 1987 1992 1958 1994 1961 1974 1985 1956 2003 1990 1982 1954 1999 1963 2004 1969 1970 1997 1973 1953 1964 1966 1996 1978 1981 1979 1975 1998 1959 1984 1986 1983 1989 1957 1967 1955 1980 1960 1971 1972 1977 1968 1991 2002 1995 1976 1,43 5 7 9111315161820222426283031333537394143454648505254565860626365676971737577788082848688909293959799 Year P RYD (%) RYD (% ) 49% risky years (26/53)forsem iearly hybrid (K y=1.6) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2000 1993 1965 1952 1994 1987 1996 2003 1992 1990 1988 1962 1954 1985 1964 1981 1982 1998 1973 1958 1953 1995 1968 1999 1956 1986 1980 2001 1970 1969 1963 1997 1978 1984 1974 1972 1989 1967 1951 2004 1966 1960 1979 1991 1957 1975 1983 2002 1977 1976 1961 1955 1971 1959 1,43 5 7 911121416182022242527293133353638404244464749515355575960626466687071737577798182848688909294959799 Year P R YD (%) RYD (% ) 71% risky years (38/54)forthe late hybrids (K y=1.6) a) R YD Threshold O bserved R YD H708 (Vurlev,Kolev,Kirkova) Sim ulated R YD w ith Ky=1.6 O bserved R YD H708 (R afailov) O bserved R YD forsem i-early hybrids,(Jivkov and Vurlev) Fig.5 Probability of exceedance curve of relative yield decrease RYD for rainfed maize, Ky=1.6, soil of small TAW (116 mm m -1 ) at: a) Chelopechene, Sofia field, and b) Tsalapitsa, Plovdiv, 1951-2004. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2000 1994 1993 1965 1988 1996 1962 1981 1992 1958 1995 1980 1978 1972 1984 1963 1969 1982 1967 1951 2004 1979 1960 1997 1977 1976 1961 1955 1971 2002 1959 1983 1,4357911121416182022242527293133353638404244464749515355575960626466687071737577798182848688909294959799 Y ear PR YD (%) RYD (% ) 65 % risky years(35/54)forTAW =116 57 % risky years(31/54)forTAW =136 32 % risky years(17/54)forTAW =180 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1958 2000 1993 1963 1965 2003 1988 1952 1961 1990 1994 1996 1962 1974 1980 1956 1989 1986 1964 1951 1997 1972 1981 1968 1960 1978 1971 1983 1995 1955 1991 1979 1970 1977 1957 1975 2002 1,4357911121416182022242527293133353638404244464749515355575960626466687071737577798182848688909294959799 Y ear PRYD (%) RYD (% ) 32 % risky years(17/54)forTA W =116 19 % risky years(10/54)forTA W =136-157 13 % risky years(7/54)forTA W =180 a) b) RYD Threshold latehybrids TAW =180 m m m-1 TAW =136-157 m m m-1 TAW =116 m m m-1 Fig.6 Probability exceedance curves of RYD of rainfed maize for soil groups of small, medium and large TAW, Ky=1.6, at: a) Plovdiv, South and b) Pleven, North Bulgaria, late maize hybrids (H708, 2L602, BC622), 1951-2004. b) a) Fig.7 Comparison of relative yield decrease (RYD, %) probability of exceedance curves, Ky = 1.6, six climate regions and two soil groups of: a) medium (136-157 mm m -1 ) and b) large (180 mm m -1 ) TAW, rainfed maize, 1951-2004. South B ulgaria N orth Bulgaria S ofia field Thracian Low land S andanski Danube Plain Sofia Plovdiv S tara Zagora S andanski Pleven Lom Silistra Varna Climate region C ontinental Transitional continental Transitional Mediterranean C ontinental Black sea Maize hybrid semiearly Late (H708, 2L602, BC622) TAW m m m -1 A verage Yield, kg ha -1 Cv , % A verage Yield, kg ha -1 Cv , % A verage Yield, kg ha -1 Cv , % A verage Yield, kg ha -1 Cv , % Cv , % Cv , % Cv , % Cv , % 116 4421 42 3894 69 3723 59 2292 72 50 55 46 50 136-157 4920 37 4550 59 4299 52 2906 59 44 47 40 42 180 5896 29 5915 43 4250 41 34 35 30 30 173 5483 41 Table 1. Variability of rainfed maize grain yield characterized by the average value, kg ha -1 , and the coefficient of variation Cv, %, climate regions and soil groups in Bulgaria, 1951-2004. Table 2. Parameters of specific relationships y=a+bx between simulated relative yield decrease RYD (%) / net irrigation requirements NIRs (mm) and High Peak Season SPI2 “July-Aug” across considered soil groups and climate regions, Bulgaria, maize, 1951-2004 Table 3. Economical threshold of High Peak Season SPI2 “July-Aug” (the average SPI2 for July and August) indicating the risk relative to rainfed maize for climate region/soil groups in Bulgaria w et yearw ith P =10% average yearw ith P =50% dry yearw ith P =90% Conclusions: Rainfed maize yield and risky years Deriving of drought vulnerability categories Drought vulnerability mapping The study relative to eight climate regions, three soil groups and the period 1951-2004, Bulgaria, shows that: ٠ In soils of large TAW (180 mm m -1 ), Plovdiv (Transitional Continental climate), net irrigation requirements (NIRs) range 0-40 mm in wet years and 350- 380 mm in dry years. In soils of small TAW (116 mm m -1 ), NIRs reach 440 mm in the very dry year (Fig.3b). NIRs in Sofia and Silistra (Continental climate) are about 100 mm smaller than in Plovdiv while in Sandanski and Northern Greece (Transitional Mediterranean climate) they are 30-110 mm larger (Fig.4). ٠ Rainfed maize is associated with great yield variability in this country (29%<Cv<72%). The smallest Cv refers to Sofia field for soils of large TAW (29%) while Cv=42% is typical for soils of small TAW there. The most variable yields are found in Sandanski (Cv=72%) and Plovdiv (Cv=69%) if TAW=116 mm m -1 . The variability of rainfed maize yield in the Danube Plain (30<Cv<55%) is much lower than in the Thracian Lowland (Table 1). ٠ In Plovdiv region reliable relationships (R 2 >91%) were found for seasonal agricultural drought relating the SPI2 for “July-Aug” with the simulated RYD of rainfed maize (Fig.8) while in Stara Zagora, Sandanski and Sofia the relationships were less accurate (73<R 2 <83%, Table 2). The study found statistically significant correlations between SPI2 “July-Aug” and simulated RYD of rainfed maize for North Bulgaria (R 2 >0.81) as well. ٠ When maize is grown without irrigation on soils of large TAW maize development is less affected by the water stress and economical losses are produced if high peak season SPI2 is less than +0.20 in Sandanski, -0.50 in Plovdiv and Stara Zagora and -0.90 in Sofia field (Table 3). This threshold ranges between -0.75 (Lom) and -1.50 (Pleven) for North Bulgaria. Corresponding NIR thresholds were identified. ٠ The derived reliable relationships and specific thresholds of seasonal SPI2 “July-Aug”, under which soil moisture deficit leads to severe impact of drought on rainfed maize yield for the main climate regions and soil groups in Bulgaria, are representative of a wider area of Moderate Continental, Transitional Continental/Transitional Mediterranean and Black Sea climate in SEE. They are used for elaboration of drought vulnerability maps and identification of drought prone territories at regional and national level (Figs.9 and 10). SPI2 “July-Aug” NIR Irrigation requirements Fig.4 Comparison of Net irrigation requirements (NIRs) probability curves relative to six climate regions and soil group of medium TAW, 136-157 mm m -1 , maize, 1951-2004. 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 PNIRs (%) NIRs(m m ) Pleven Silistra Sofia Plovdiv Sandanski V arna 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 PR YD (%) RYD (% ) 12 % riskyyears(6/51)forPleven 10 % riskyyears(5/51)forSilistra 20 % riskyyears(10/51)forSofia 29 % riskyyears(15/51)forPlovdiv 63 % riskyyears(32/51)forSandanski 14 % riskyyears(7/51)forV arna Pleven RYD Threshold Plovdiv/SilistraRYD Threshold SofiaRYD Threshold Pleven Silistra Sofia Plovdiv Sandanski Varna Popova Z.(Ed.) 2012 RISK ASSESSMENT OF DROUGHT IN AGRICULTURE AND IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT THROUGH SIMULATION MODELS Abstract Ref. № 1452414 Paper № NH21B-1593 Soil groups according to TAW Sm all Medium Large Clim ate Region 116 m m m -1 136-157 m m m -1 173-180 m m m -1 RYD % NIRs mm RYD % NIRs mm RYD % NIRs mm Sandanski Intercept a 79.6 312,3 74.1 294.2 62.1 256.6 Slope coefficient b -15.0 -66,4 -15.7 -66.2 -16.1 -65.8 R 2 (%) 75 70 77 70 78 70 Stara Zagora Intercept a 67.0 259.2 61.81 243.3 51.3 211.4 Slope coefficient b -19.9 -83.2 -20.5 -83.1 -20.5 -83.4 R 2 (%) 80 77 82 78 83 79 Plovdiv Intercept a 65.2 244.4 59.4 226.7 47.2 189.9 Slope coefficient b -24.8 -97.3 -24.7 -96.4 -23.6 -93.8 R 2 (%) 92 89 92 89 91 89 Lom Intercept a 57.7 202.5 51.3 184.7 38.5 148.7 Slope coefficient b -23.8 -81.7 -23.6 -81.5 -22.1 -78.9 R 2 (%) 86 80 86 80 86 81 Sofia Intercept a 48.4 178.8 42.6 162.5 31.2 129.2 Slope coefficient b -21.0 -78.2 -20.5 -77.1 -18.8 -73.3 R 2 (%) 76 76 75 75 73 73 Silistra Intercept a 56.1 190.3 49.1 171.7 35.9 135.4 Slope coefficient b -20.5 -68.5 -20.3 -68.5 -19.3 -67.4 R 2 (% ) 86 84 86 85 86 85 Pleven Intercept a 53.5 202.4 47.6 184.8 35.7 148.4 Slope coefficient b -23.3 -88.1 -23 -87.1 -21.6 -84.3 R 2 (%) 82 77 81 76 79 75 Varna Intercept a 63.6 212.3 56.9 195 43 158.1 Slope coefficient b -18.1 -59.6 -17.6 -58.7 -16.5 -56.72 R 2 (%) 82 73 81 74 80 73 b) y = -23.61x + 47.22 R 2 = 0.91 0 60 -2,00-1,50-1,00-0,50 0,00 0,50 1,00 1,50 2,00 2,50 SPI(2)for "July -A ug" R YD raim fed m aize (% ) R YD threshold y = -21.57x + 35.72 R 2 = 0.79 0 67 -2,50-2,00-1,50-1,00-0,50 0,00 0,50 1,00 1,50 2,00 2,50 SPI(2)for "July -A ug" RYD raim fed m aize (% ) RYD threshold b) b) a) b) A version of seasonal standard precipitation index SPI (Pereira et al., 2010), that is an average of the index during periods of crop sensitivity to water stress, is used as a specific drought indicator. Average SPI2 for several periods referring to maize vegetation season “May-Aug”, Peak Season “June-Aug”, and High Peak Season “July-Aug” were used to define categories of agricultural drought. The usual soils in South Bulgaria are the chromic luvisols/cambisols of medium total available water TAW (136 mm m -1 ) and the vertisols of large TAW (170≤TAW≤180 mm m -1 ). The typical soils in the plains of North Bulgaria are the chernozems of medium to large TAW, 157-180 mm m -1 , and the vertisols (TAW≥170 mm m -1 ). Alluvial/deluvial meadow and light-textured luvisol soils of small TAW≤116 mm m -1 are well identified over the terraces along the rivers. Climate uncertainty affects performance and management of agriculture. Extreme weather events, as drought, lead to substantial increase in agricultural risk and unstable farm incomes. The necessity to develop methodologies and simulation tools for better analysing/forecasting/managing the risk of agricultural drought is evident after the extremely dry 2000, 2007 and 2012. Simulations are performed under a Transitional Continental (Plovdiv and Stara Zagora), a Moderate Continental (Sofia, Pleven, Silistra and Lom), a Transitional Mediterranean (Sandanski) and a North Black Sea (Varna) climate. Specific drought indicators, relationships and economical thresholds are derived by relating seasonal SPI-index to simulation results of water stress impacts on rainfed maize yield and irrigation requirements (Fig.8, Tables 2 and 3). Probability curves of maize net irrigation requirement (NIRs, mm) were built for each climate region and soil group using ISAREG model simulations over the period 1951-2004 (Figs. 3 and 4). Relative yield decrease (RYD, %) is simulated with option ‘maize without irrigation’ and yield response factor Ky = 1.6 for a soil of small TAW (116 mm m -1 ), Sofia and Plovdiv (Fig.5). Additional RYD data from long-term field experiments carried out with semi-early maize hybrids (Fig.5a) or late maize hybrids H708 (Fig.5b) are plotted as well. Results show that the adopted Ky=1.6 could reflect well the impact of water stress on rainfed maize yield in this country. When soil water holding capacity ranges (116<TAW<180 mm m -1 ) the relative yield decrease differs by about 20% (Fig.6). Relative yield decrease (RYD) probability of exceedance curves, built for each climate region and soils of medium TAW (136-157 mm m - 1 ) are compared in Fig.7a. RYD is the largest in Sandanski ranging from 65 to 85% over the average demand years (40<P RYD <75%). It is also very high in Plovdiv (60<RYD<70%) but lower in Sofia and Pleven (30<RYD<50%) over the same years. In the very dry years (P RYD <5%) yield losses are over 95% in Plovdiv and Sandanski and more than 85% in Sofia field, Silistra, Pleven and Varna (Fig.7a). Considering a trend of NIR for 1951-2004, an average increase by 80mm is found for Plovdiv; Contrarily, a 19% grain production decrease for rainfed maize is found there. Maps of High Peak Season SPI2 “July-Aug” spatial distribution relative to the very dry (2000), the average (1970) and the moderately dry (1981) year are elaborated, as presented in Figs. 10a, 10b and 10c. The latter maps and derived relationships (Table 2) are used then to predict the distribution of yield losses of rainfed maize (Figs. 10d, 10e, 10f) or maize irrigation requirements in Bulgaria (Figs.10g, 10h and 10i). The WinISAREG model (Pereira et al., 2003) is an irrigation scheduling simulation tool for computing the soil water balance and evaluating the respective impacts on crop yields. The model adopts the water balance approach of Doorenbos & Pruitt (1977) and the updated methodology to compute crop evapotranspiration and irrigation requirements (Allen et al. 1998). ٠ Considering an economical relative yield decrease (RYD) threshold of 60 and 48% of the potential maize productivity in Plovdiv and Sofia, 30 % of years are risky when TAW=180 mm m -1 in Plovdiv, that is double than in Sofia and half than in Sandanski (Fig.7b). In North Bulgaria the economical RYD threshold is 67, 55 and 60% for Pleven, Lom and Silistra. When TAW=180 mm m -1 only about 10% of the years are risky in Pleven and Silistra that is half than in Lom. When TAW is medium (157 mm m -1 ) the risky years rise to 19, 35 and 45 % in the three sites respectively and reach 50% in Varna (Fig.7a). V.Koinov, I. Kabakchiev, K. Boneva, 1998 Fig.10 Spatial distribution of seasonal SPI2 “July-Aug” a)-c)/ Relative yield decrease for rainfed maize (RYD, %) d)-f) / Net irrigation requirements (NIR, mm) g)-i) relative to the year of: a), d) and g) extreme (2000); b), e) and h) average (1970) and c), f) and i) moderate (1981) irrigation demand, Bulgaria Map of Bulgaria with experimenta l fields of ISSAPPNP and meteorologi cal stations of NIMH. Monthly precipitation in June, July and August relative to the average demand year are the largest in Sofia field, which is double than in Plovdiv, Sandanski, Lom and Varna (Fig.2). 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 PRYD (%) RYD (% ) 18 % riskyyears(9/51)forPleven 35 % riskyyears(18/51)forSilistra 39 % riskyyears(20/51)forSofia 59 % riskyyears(30/51)forPlovdiv 82 % riskyyears(42/51)forSandanski 49 % riskyyears(25/51)forV arna Results and findings: Fig.2 Average monthly precipitation for the average (probability of exceedance of precipitation P=50%), wet (P=10%) and dry (P=90%) season at: a) Sofia and b) Plovdiv, May-Sept 1951-2004. RYD C lim ate R egion Soil groups according to total available w ater TAW: Small 116 m m m -1 Medium 136-157 m m m -1 Large 173-180 m m m -1 Transitional Mediterranean Sandanski +1.40 +1.00 +0.20 Transitional C ontinental Stara Zagora +0.50 +0.10 -0.50 Plovdiv +0.15 0.00 -0.50 Moderate C ontinental Lom +0.15 -0.10 -0.75 Sofia 0.00 -0.25 -0.90 Silistra -0.15 -0.50 -1.25 Pleven -0.50 -0.75 -1.50 N orthern Black Sea Varna +0.21 -0.21 -1.05

Upload: reece

Post on 20-Jan-2016

19 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Abstract Ref. № 1452414 Paper № NH21B-1593. Z . Popova * , М. Ivanova*, K . Doneva * , M. Kercheva *, L . S . Pereira**, V . Alexandrov***, P . Alexandrova *. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT AND SOLUTIONS TO COPE WITH AGRICULTURAL DROUGHT IN BULGARIA

IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT AND SOLUTIONS TO COPE WITH AGRICULTURAL DROUGHT IN BULGARIA Z. Popova*, М. Ivanova*, K. Doneva*, M. Kercheva*, L.S.Pereira**, V.Alexandrov***, P. Alexandrova*

AGU Fall Meeting 3-7 December 2012, San Francisco, California

*N. Poushkarov Institute of Soil Science, Agrotechnology and Plant Protection-ISSAPPNP, 7 Shosse Bankya Str., 1080 Sofia, Bulgaria ([email protected]); **CEER-Biosystems Engineering, Institute of Agronomy, Technical University of Lisbon, Tapada de Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal

*** National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology- NIMH, 66 Tsarigradsko chaussee Blvd., 1784 SofiaThe objective of this study is to quantify the impact of climate variability, including drought, on agricultural productivity and irrigation requirements in Bulgaria using simulation model WinISAREG for maize crop and seasonal SPI2 “July-Aug” for the period 1951-2004.

AcknowledgementsWe gratefully acknowledge the financial support of Drought Management Center for South East Europe Project, Contract no. SEE/A/091/2.2/X, South East Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme co-funded by the European Union, for implementation and dissemination of our studies’ results on crop vulnerability to droughts and irrigation management in Bulgaria.

Materials and methods:

Climate

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

1951

1952

1953

1954

1955

1956

1957

1958

1959

1960

1961

1962

1963

1964

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004a)

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

1951

1952

1953

1954

1955

1956

1957

1958

1959

1960

1961

1962

1963

1964

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004b)

Fig.1 .Evolution of High Peak Season (July-Aug) SPI2 at: a) Sofia and b) Plovdiv, 1951-2004.

Soil

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

May June July August September

mo

nth

su

m o

f p

reci

pit

atio

n (

mm

)

a)0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

May June July August September

mo

nth

su

m o

f p

reci

pit

atio

n (

mm

)

b)

CropMaize was selected as a typical summer crop. Crop coefficients Kc, water depletion fraction for no stress p and the yield response factor Ky (Allen et al., 1998) were calibrated and validated using detailed independent datasets relative to long term experiments with late and semi - early maize varieties carried out under different irrigation schedules in Tsalapitsa, Plovdiv, Pustren and Zora, Stara Zagora, and Bojurishte, Sofia field.

Simulation model

The model was previously validated for maize hybrids of different sensitivity to water stress on soils of small, medium and large total available water (TAW) in various locations of Bulgaria (Popova et al., 2006; Popova, 2008; Popova and Pereira, 2010; Ivanova and Popova, 2011).

Fig.3 Net irrigation requirements (NIRs) probability of exceedance curves relative to soil groups of small, medium and large total available water (TAW) at: a) Sofia field; b) Plovdiv, South

Bulgaria, maize, 1951-2004.

a)

Fig.8 Relationships between seasonal SPI2 “July-Aug” (X-axis) and relative yield decrease of rainfed maize RYD with Ky=1.6 (Y-axis) at: a) Plovdiv and b)

Pleven; soils of large TAW (180 mm m-1), late maize hybrids.

Fig.9 Map of economical SPI2 “July-Aug” threshold, under which soil moisture deficit leads to severe impacts on yield losses for rainfed maize, Bulgaria.

Results from Table 3, Soil map and Map of TAW of the soils are used for mapping the SPI2 “July-Aug” threshold.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1993

2000

1952

1962

1965

1988

2001

1987

1992

1958

1994

1961

1974

1985

1956

2003

1990

1982

1954

1999

1963

2004

1969

1970

1997

1973

1953

1964

1966

1996

1978

1981

1979

1975

1998

1959

1984

1986

1983

1989

1957

1967

1955

1980

1960

1971

1972

1977

1968

1991

2002

1995

1976

1,43 5 7 9111315161820222426283031333537394143454648505254565860626365676971737577788082848688909293959799

Year

PRYD (%)

RY

D (

%)

49% risky years (26/53) for semi early hybrid (Ky=1.6)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2000

1993

1965

1952

1994

1987

1996

2003

1992

1990

1988

1962

1954

1985

1964

1981

1982

1998

1973

1958

1953

1995

1968

1999

1956

1986

1980

2001

1970

1969

1963

1997

1978

1984

1974

1972

1989

1967

1951

2004

1966

1960

1979

1991

1957

1975

1983

2002

1977

1976

1961

1955

1971

1959

1,43 5 7 911121416182022242527293133353638404244464749515355575960626466687071737577798182848688909294959799

Year

PRYD (%)

RY

D (

%)

71% risky years (38/54) for the late hybrids (Ky=1.6)

a)

b)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1993

2000

1952

1962

1965

1988

2001

1987

1992

1958

1994

1961

1974

1985

1956

2003

1990

1982

1954

1999

1963

2004

1969

1970

1997

1973

1953

1964

1966

1996

1978

1981

1979

1975

1998

1959

1984

1986

1983

1989

1957

1967

1955

1980

1960

1971

1972

1977

1968

1991

2002

1995

1976

1,4 3 5 7 9 111315161820222426283031333537394143454648505254565860626365676971737577788082848688909293959799

Year

PRYD (%)

RYD Threshold Observed RYD H708 (Vurlev, Kolev, Kirkova)Simulated RYD with Ky=1.6 Observed RYD H708 (Rafailov)Observed RYD for semi-early hybrids, (Jivkov and Vurlev)

49% risky years (26/53) for semi early hybrid with Ky=1.6

Fig.5 Probability of exceedance curve of relative yield decrease RYD for rainfed maize, Ky=1.6, soil of small TAW (116 mm m-1) at: a) Chelopechene, Sofia field, and b) Tsalapitsa, Plovdiv, 1951-2004.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2000

1994

1993

1965

1988

1996

1962

1981

1992

1958

1995

1980

1978

1972

1984

1963

1969

1982

1967

1951

2004

1979

1960

1997

1977

1976

1961

1955

1971

2002

1959

1983

1,43 5 7 911121416182022242527293133353638404244464749515355575960626466687071737577798182848688909294959799

Year PRYD (%)

RY

D (%

)

65 % risky years (35/54) for TAW=11657 % risky years(31/54) for TAW=13632 % risky years(17/54) for TAW=180

a)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1958

2000

1993

1963

1965

2003

1988

1952

1961

1990

1994

1996

1962

1974

1980

1956

1989

1986

1964

1951

1997

1972

1981

1968

1960

1978

1971

1983

1995

1955

1991

1979

1970

1977

1957

1975

2002

1,43 5 7 911121416182022242527293133353638404244464749515355575960626466687071737577798182848688909294959799

Year PRYD (%)

RY

D (%

)

32 % risky years (17/54) for TAW=11619 % risky years(10/54) for TAW=136-157

13 % risky years(7/54) for TAW=180

a) b)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1958

2000

1993

1963

1965

2003

1988

1952

1961

1990

1994

1996

1962

1974

1980

1956

1989

1986

1964

1951

1997

1972

1981

1968

1960

1978

1971

1983

1995

1955

1991

1979

1970

1977

1957

1975

2002

1,43 5 7 911121416182022242527293133353638404244464749515355575960626466687071737577798182848688909294959799

RYD Threshold late hybrids TAW=180 mm m-1 TAW=136-157 mm m-1 TAW=116 mm m-1

32 % risky years (17/54) for TAW=11619 % risky years(10/54) for TAW=136-157

13 % risky years(7/54) for TAW=180

Fig.6 Probability exceedance curves of RYD of rainfed maize for soil groups of small, medium and large TAW, Ky=1.6, at: a) Plovdiv, South and b) Pleven, North Bulgaria, late

maize hybrids (H708, 2L602, BC622), 1951-2004.

b)

a)

Fig.7 Comparison of relative yield decrease (RYD, %) probability of exceedance curves, Ky = 1.6, six climate regions and two soil groups of: a) medium (136-157

mm m-1) and b) large (180 mm m-1) TAW, rainfed maize, 1951-2004.

South Bulgaria North Bulgaria

Sofia field Thracian Lowland Sandanski Danube Plain

Sofia Plovdiv Stara Zagora Sandanski Pleven Lom Silistra Varna Climate region

Continental

Transitional continental

Transitional Mediterranean Continental

Black sea

Maize hybrid semi early Late (H708, 2L602, BC622)

TAW mm m-1

Average Yield, kg ha-1

Cv, %

Average Yield, kg ha-1

Cv, %

Average Yield, kg ha-1

Cv, %

Average Yield, kg ha-1

Cv, %

Cv, %

Cv, %

Cv, %

Cv, %

116 4421 42 3894 69 3723 59 2292 72 50 55 46 50 136-157 4920 37 4550 59 4299 52 2906 59 44 47 40 42

180 5896 29 5915 43 4250 41 34 35 30 30 173 5483 41

Table 1. Variability of rainfed maize grain yield characterized by the average value, kg ha-1, and the coefficient of variation Cv, %, climate regions and soil groups in Bulgaria, 1951-2004.

Table 2. Parameters of specific relationships y=a+bx between simulated relative yield decrease RYD (%) / net irrigation requirements NIRs (mm) and High Peak Season SPI2 “July-Aug” across considered soil groups and climate regions, Bulgaria, maize, 1951-2004

Table 3. Economical threshold of High Peak Season SPI2 “July-Aug” (the average SPI2 for July and August) indicating the risk relative to rainfed maize for climate region/soil groups in Bulgaria

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

May June July August September

wet year with P=10% average year with P=50% dry year with P=90%

Conclusions:

Rainfed maize yield and risky years

Deriving of drought vulnerability categories

Drought vulnerability mapping

The study relative to eight climate regions, three soil groups and the period 1951-2004, Bulgaria, shows that:

٠In soils of large TAW (180 mm m-1), Plovdiv (Transitional Continental climate), net irrigation requirements (NIRs) range 0-40 mm in wet years and 350-380 mm in dry years. In soils of small TAW (116 mm m-1), NIRs reach 440 mm in the very dry year (Fig.3b). NIRs in Sofia and Silistra (Continental climate) are about 100 mm smaller than in Plovdiv while in Sandanski and Northern Greece (Transitional Mediterranean climate) they are 30-110 mm larger (Fig.4). ٠Rainfed maize is associated with great yield variability in this country (29%<Cv<72%). The smallest Cv refers to Sofia field for soils of large TAW (29%) while Cv=42% is typical for soils of small TAW there. The most variable yields are found in Sandanski (Cv=72%) and Plovdiv (Cv=69%) if TAW=116 mm m-1. The variability of rainfed maize yield in the Danube Plain (30<Cv<55%) is much lower than in the Thracian Lowland (Table 1).

٠In Plovdiv region reliable relationships (R2>91%) were found for seasonal agricultural drought relating the SPI2 for “July-Aug” with the simulated RYD of rainfed maize (Fig.8) while in Stara Zagora, Sandanski and Sofia the relationships were less accurate (73<R2<83%, Table 2). The study found statistically significant correlations between SPI2 “July-Aug” and simulated RYD of rainfed maize for North Bulgaria (R2>0.81) as well.

٠When maize is grown without irrigation on soils of large TAW maize development is less affected by the water stress and economical losses are produced if high peak season SPI2 is less than +0.20 in Sandanski, -0.50 in Plovdiv and Stara Zagora and -0.90 in Sofia field (Table 3). This threshold ranges between -0.75 (Lom) and -1.50 (Pleven) for North Bulgaria. Corresponding NIR thresholds were identified.

٠The derived reliable relationships and specific thresholds of seasonal SPI2 “July-Aug”, under which soil moisture deficit leads to severe impact of drought on rainfed maize yield for the main climate regions and soil groups in Bulgaria, are representative of a wider area of Moderate Continental, Transitional Continental/Transitional Mediterranean and Black Sea climate in SEE. They are used for elaboration of drought vulnerability maps and identification of drought prone territories at regional and national level (Figs.9 and 10).

SPI2 “July-Aug”

NIR

Irrigation requirements

Fig.4 Comparison of Net irrigation requirements (NIRs) probability curves relative to six climate regions and soil group of medium TAW, 136-157 mm m-1, maize, 1951-2004.

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 PNIRs (%)

NIR

s (m

m)

Pleven Silistra Sofia Plovdiv Sandanski Varna

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

PRYD (%)

RY

D (%

)

12 % risky years (6/51) for Pleven 10 % risky years (5/51) for Silistra 20 % risky years(10/51) for Sofia

29 % risky years (15/51) for Plovdiv 63 % risky years(32/51) for Sandanski

14 % risky years(7/51) for Varna0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Pleven RYD Threshold Plovdiv/Silistra RYD Threshold Sofia RYD Threshold Pleven Silistra Sofia Plovdiv Sandanski Varna

12 % risky years (6/51) for Pleven 10 % risky years (5/51) for Silistra 20 % risky years(10/51) for Sofia

29 % risky years (15/51) for Plovdiv 63 % risky years(32/51) for Sandanski

14 % risky years(7/51) for Varna

Popova Z.(Ed.) 2012 RISK ASSESSMENT OF DROUGHT IN AGRICULTURE AND IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT THROUGH SIMULATION MODELS

Abstract Ref. № 1452414

Paper № NH21B-1593

Soil groups according to TAW

Small Medium Large Climate Region 116 mm m-1 136-157 mm m-1 173-180 mm m-1

RYD

% NIRs mm

RYD %

NIRs mm

RYD %

NIRs mm

Sandanski

Intercept a 79.6 312,3 74.1 294.2 62.1 256.6 Slope coefficient b -15.0 -66,4 -15.7 -66.2 -16.1 -65.8 R2 (%) 75 70 77 70 78 70 Stara Zagora Intercept a 67.0 259.2 61.81 243.3 51.3 211.4 Slope coefficient b -19.9 -83.2 -20.5 -83.1 -20.5 -83.4 R2 (%) 80 77 82 78 83 79 Plovdiv Intercept a 65.2 244.4 59.4 226.7 47.2 189.9 Slope coefficient b -24.8 -97.3 -24.7 -96.4 -23.6 -93.8 R2 (%) 92 89 92 89 91 89 Lom Intercept a 57.7 202.5 51.3 184.7 38.5 148.7 Slope coefficient b -23.8 -81.7 -23.6 -81.5 -22.1 -78.9 R2 (%) 86 80 86 80 86 81 Sofia Intercept a 48.4 178.8 42.6 162.5 31.2 129.2 Slope coefficient b -21.0 -78.2 -20.5 -77.1 -18.8 -73.3 R2 (%) 76 76 75 75 73 73 Silistra Intercept a 56.1 190.3 49.1 171.7 35.9 135.4 Slope coefficient b -20.5 -68.5 -20.3 -68.5 -19.3 -67.4 R2 (%) 86 84 86 85 86 85 Pleven Intercept a 53.5 202.4 47.6 184.8 35.7 148.4 Slope coefficient b -23.3 -88.1 -23 -87.1 -21.6 -84.3 R2 (%) 82 77 81 76 79 75 Varna Intercept a 63.6 212.3 56.9 195 43 158.1 Slope coefficient b -18.1 -59.6 -17.6 -58.7 -16.5 -56.72 R2 (%) 82 73 81 74 80 73

b)

y = -23.61x + 47.22

R2 = 0.91

0

60

-2,00 -1,50 -1,00 -0,50 0,00 0,50 1,00 1,50 2,00 2,50

SPI (2) for "July - Aug"

RY

D r

aim

fed

mai

ze (

%)

RYD threshold

y = -21.57x + 35.72R2 = 0.79

0

67

-2,50 -2,00 -1,50 -1,00 -0,50 0,00 0,50 1,00 1,50 2,00 2,50

SPI (2) for "July - Aug"

RY

D r

aim

fed

mai

ze (

%) RYD threshold

b)

b)

a) b)

A version of seasonal standard precipitation index SPI (Pereira et al., 2010), that is an average of the index during periods of crop sensitivity to water stress, is used as a specific drought indicator. Average SPI2 for several periods referring to maize vegetation season “May-Aug”, Peak Season “June-Aug”, and High Peak Season “July-Aug” were used to define categories of agricultural drought.

The usual soils in South Bulgaria are the chromic luvisols/cambisols of medium total available water TAW (136 mm m-1) and the vertisols of large TAW (170≤TAW≤180 mm m-1). The typical soils in the plains of North Bulgaria are the chernozems of medium to large TAW, 157-180 mm m-1, and the vertisols (TAW≥170 mm m-1). Alluvial/deluvial meadow and light-textured luvisol soils of small TAW≤116 mm m-1 are well identified over the terraces along the rivers.

Climate uncertainty affects performance and management of agriculture. Extreme weather events, as drought, lead to substantial increase in agricultural risk and unstable farm incomes. The necessity to develop methodologies and simulation tools for better analysing/forecasting/managing the risk of agricultural drought is evident after the extremely dry 2000, 2007 and 2012.

Simulations are performed under a Transitional Continental (Plovdiv and Stara Zagora), a Moderate Continental (Sofia,  Pleven, Silistra and Lom), a Transitional Mediterranean (Sandanski) and a North Black Sea (Varna) climate.

Specific drought indicators, relationships and economical thresholds are derived by relating seasonal SPI-index to simulation results of water stress impacts on rainfed maize yield and irrigation requirements (Fig.8, Tables 2 and 3).

Probability curves of maize net irrigation requirement (NIRs, mm) were built for each climate region and soil group using ISAREG model simulations over the period 1951-2004 (Figs. 3 and 4).

Relative yield decrease (RYD, %) is simulated with option ‘maize without irrigation’ and yield response factor Ky = 1.6 for a soil of small TAW (116 mm m-1), Sofia and Plovdiv (Fig.5). Additional RYD data from long-term field experiments carried out with semi-early maize hybrids (Fig.5a) or late maize hybrids H708 (Fig.5b) are plotted as well. Results show that the adopted Ky=1.6 could reflect well the impact of water stress on rainfed maize yield in this country.

When soil water holding capacity ranges (116<TAW<180 mm m-1) the relative yield decrease differs by about 20% (Fig.6).

Relative yield decrease (RYD) probability of exceedance curves, built for each climate region and soils of medium TAW (136-157 mm m -1) are compared in Fig.7a. RYD is the largest in Sandanski ranging from 65 to 85% over the average demand years (40<PRYD<75%). It is also very high in Plovdiv (60<RYD<70%) but lower in Sofia and Pleven (30<RYD<50%) over the same years. In the very dry years (PRYD<5%) yield losses are over 95% in Plovdiv and Sandanski and more than 85% in Sofia field, Silistra, Pleven and Varna (Fig.7a).

Considering a trend of NIR for 1951-2004, an average increase by 80mm is found for Plovdiv; Contrarily, a 19% grain production decrease for rainfed maize is found there.

Maps of High Peak Season SPI2 “July-Aug” spatial distribution relative to the very dry (2000), the average (1970) and the moderately dry (1981) year are elaborated, as presented in Figs. 10a, 10b and 10c. The latter maps and derived relationships (Table 2) are used then to predict the distribution of yield losses of rainfed maize (Figs. 10d, 10e, 10f) or maize irrigation requirements in Bulgaria (Figs.10g, 10h and 10i).

The WinISAREG model (Pereira et al., 2003) is an irrigation scheduling simulation tool for computing the soil water balance and evaluating the respective impacts on crop yields. The model adopts the water balance approach of Doorenbos & Pruitt (1977) and the updated methodology to compute crop evapotranspiration and irrigation requirements (Allen et al. 1998).

٠Considering an economical relative yield decrease (RYD) threshold of 60 and 48% of the potential maize productivity in Plovdiv and Sofia, 30 % of years are risky when TAW=180 mm m-1 in Plovdiv, that is double than in Sofia and half than in Sandanski (Fig.7b). In North Bulgaria the economical RYD threshold is 67, 55 and 60% for Pleven, Lom and Silistra. When TAW=180 mm m-1 only about 10% of the years are risky in Pleven and Silistra that is half than in Lom. When TAW is medium (157 mm m-1) the risky years rise to 19, 35 and 45 % in the three sites respectively and reach 50% in Varna (Fig.7a).

V.Koinov, I. Kabakchiev, K. Boneva, 1998

Fig.10 Spatial distribution of seasonal SPI2 “July-Aug” a)-c)/ Relative yield decrease for rainfed maize (RYD, %) d)-f) / Net irrigation requirements (NIR, mm) g)-i) relative to the year of: a), d) and g) extreme (2000); b), e) and h) average

(1970) and c), f) and i) moderate (1981) irrigation demand, Bulgaria

Map of Bulgaria with experimental

fields of ISSAPPNP

and meteorological

stations of NIMH.

Monthly precipitation in June, July and August relative to the average demand year are the largest in Sofia field, which is double than in Plovdiv, Sandanski, Lom and Varna (Fig.2).

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

PRYD (%)

RY

D (%

)

18 % risky years (9/51) for Pleven 35 % risky years (18/51) for Silistra 39 % risky years(20/51) for Sofia

59 % risky years (30/51) for Plovdiv 82 % risky years(42/51) for Sandanski

49 % risky years(25/51) for Varna

Results and findings:

Fig.2 Average monthly precipitation for the average (probability of exceedance of precipitation P=50%), wet (P=10%) and dry (P=90%) season at: a) Sofia and b) Plovdiv, May-Sept 1951-2004.

RYD

Climate Region

Soil groups according to total available water TAW:

Small116 mm m-1

Medium136-157 mm m-1

Large173-180 mm m-1

Transitional Mediterranean

Sandanski +1.40 +1.00 +0.20

Transitional Continental

Stara Zagora +0.50 +0.10 -0.50

Plovdiv +0.15 0.00 -0.50

Moderate Continental

Lom +0.15 -0.10 -0.75

Sofia 0.00 -0.25 -0.90

Silistra -0.15 -0.50 -1.25

Pleven -0.50 -0.75 -1.50

Northern Black Sea Varna +0.21 -0.21 -1.05

Climate Region

Soil groups according to total available water TAW:

Small116 mm m-1

Medium136-157 mm m-1

Large173-180 mm m-1

Transitional Mediterranean

Sandanski +1.40 +1.00 +0.20

Transitional Continental

Stara Zagora +0.50 +0.10 -0.50

Plovdiv +0.15 0.00 -0.50

Moderate Continental

Lom +0.15 -0.10 -0.75

Sofia 0.00 -0.25 -0.90

Silistra -0.15 -0.50 -1.25

Pleven -0.50 -0.75 -1.50

Northern Black Sea Varna +0.21 -0.21 -1.05