IPEDS Workshop

SHEEO/NCES Network Conference

May 8, 2006Arlington, VA

Agenda

• 2005-06 data collection• 2006-07 data collection• Help Desk report• IPEDS data use tools• Current projects of interest• AIR report• New COOL (!!!)• Influences on the future• Wrap up – Q&A

Update on 2005-06 collection

Hurricane Schools

• 41 institutions identified in early Sept that might have difficulty reporting 2005-06 IPEDS data

• 9 were able to report all components

• Flagged in data collection system• Not included in followup prompting• Nonresponse for these institutions

will NOT be a compliance issue

Hurricane Schools

• Guidelines for reporting students displaced due to hurricanes were posted at http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/web2000/katrina.asp

• AIR/NCES senior fellow is working with affected institutions

Hurricane School Response

No Data Partial Data

Complete N/A orchild

IC 21 2 18

C 20 1 20

HR 13 2 26

EF 5 3 32

GR 7 1 29 3

SFA 7 1 31 1

F 7 1 31 1

Imputation of 2005-06 data for hurricane

schoolsNot imputed:• IC• HR• EF

Imputed:• C• GRS• F• SFA

Don’t forget: institutions will have the opportunity to enter 2005-06 data in the PY Revision System next collection cycle

New HR format

• Respondents generally favorable about new format

• Easier to ensure consistency across sections, but….– Did experience a couple of

editing glitches– Contacted a few coordinators for

assistance– Table Topic – questions,

suggestions

New HR format

• Combination of an old server and the new, combined HR format had negative impact on system performance in winter

• NCES replaced collection server toward end of collection period

• Collection was extended

Finance in winter

• Almost a third of total Finance surveys were completed during Winter collection

Spring collection

• Email sent to KHs 10 days before institution close– Suggested folks not wait until

last few days to enter data– Due to high volume and ED

firewall issue

Spring Collection Extended

• 1-week followup reminder was not sent out

• Sent email notice to 281 institutions and 36 coordinators on 5/2

• New institution close date 5/10• New coordinator close date

5/17

Noncompliance Update

Noncompliance

Number of Noncompliant InstitutionsIPEDS Fall Collection

Component2002-

032003-

042004-

052005-06*

Institutional Characteristics

75 7 3 10

Completions 199 12 12 13

* Preliminary

Noncompliance

Number of Noncompliant InstitutionsIPEDS Winter Collection

Component 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05

2005-06*

Human Resources

- - - 1

Employees by Assigned Position

79 7 13 -

Salaries 50 9 5 -

Fall Staff N/A 11 N/A -* Preliminary

Noncompliance

Number of Noncompliant InstitutionsIPEDS Spring Collection

Component 2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06*

Enrollment 68 8 5

Graduation Rates

104 29 16

Student Financial Aid

134 34 15

Finance 184 35 32* Preliminary

Noncompliance

FSA Noncompliance ActionsNumber of institutions fined, warned

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05

Fined78

$1,241,000

39$370,00

0

39$175,50

0

Warned ~350 30 12

Total ~428 69 51

IPEDS Data Collection

New for 2006–07

OMB Clearance

• Current package requests clearance for 2006-07 through 2008-09

• New items include:

Preliminary Early Estimate of Fall Enrollment

• 8 numbers – on IC– FT, PT enrollment

•Undergraduate•First-time undergraduate•Graduate•First-professional

• Clearly identified as early estimates, so data can be different from what will be reported on EF

Preliminary Early Estimate of Fall Enrollment

Level of Student

Full time Part time Total

Undergrad R R CV

First-time undergrad

R R CV

Graduate R R CV

First-professional R R CV

Grand total estimated Fall 2006 enrollment

CV

R = reported valueCV = calculated value. Totals will be generated from the detail provided by the institution.

System affiliation

• Write-in item to capture affiliation with institutional system added to IC

• Relocated from Finance• Will be pulled forward in

subsequent years• Will be used in project to

aggregate IPEDS data to system level

Price of attendance

• For institutions that report price data by program– Allow reporting of program

length in credit hours or contact hours

– Collect average number of months it takes to complete the largest program

– Clarification for IPEDS COOL

Fall Enrollment

• Degree-granting institutions • New column

– Transfers into the institution (first-time at institution)

• Full time and part time

Fall Enrollment – Transfers In

Full-time undergraduate students

Degree/certificate-seeking Non-degree/

non-certif-

seeking

TotalFirst-time

Trans-fers in Other Total

R/E R R R CV R CV

Total CV CV CV CV CV CV

R = reported value; CV = calculated value

Human Resources

• 4-yr degree-granting institutions– Add tenure status of instructional

staff back to SA section

• Institutions with <15 full-time employees– Would do short Fall Staff section

(collects data by primary occupational activity, by race/ethnicity and gender)

Race/Ethnicity

• YES

• SOON

• Not in 2006-07

• Depends on OMB clearance – check Federal Register

Collection Schedule

2006–07

Registration

Registration opens August 2

UserIDs to KHs August 2

Surveys, etc posted August 2

Status of registration taken

August 30

Letters to CEO – KH not reg

September 1

Fall Collection

SurveysInstitutional CharacteristicsCompletions

Collection open

September 6

Institution close

October 18

Coordinator close

November 1

Winter Collection

Surveys

Human ResourcesEnrollment (available)Finance (available)

Collection open December 6

Institution close

January 24

Coordinator close

February 7

Spring Collection

Surveys

Enrollment FinanceStudent Financial AidGraduation Rates

Collection open March 7

Institution close

April 18

Coordinator close

May 2

Followup Schedule

Email to KH (collection open) Open

Letter to CEO (no reg KH) Close – 4wks

Email to KH (no data) Close – 4wks

Phone to CEO (no reg KH) Close – 3wks

Phone to CEO/KH (no data) Close – 2wks

Email to KH (no data) Close – 2wks

Email to KH (not locked) Close – 2wks

Email to KH (no data) Close – 1wk

Email to KH (not locked) Close – 1wk

Help Desk Report

IPEDS Data Use Tools

Data Tool Demos

• State Data Tables and Education Data Profiles– In a minute or two

• New COOL– Monday afternoon

• IPEDS Report Templates– Monday 3:45 pm

• IPEDS DAS– Tuesday 9:00 am

New Peer Tool Interface

• TRP held in Nov 2005• Participants tried out the new

interface and loved it– Variable search– Easily choose multiple years of

same variable

• Suggested we deploy it ASAP

New institutional category variable

• Technical Review Panel met in Oct 2005

• Addressed issue of sector bleed, degree creep

• TRP summary available at http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/trp13.asp

• Derived variable added to PAS• Will be used to group institutions for

tabulated data in addition to sector

instcatDegree-granting

Baccalaureate or above1 - Grad w/ no undergrad degrees2 - Primarily bacc or above3 - Other bacc granting

4 - Associate's + certificates

Nondegree-granting5 - Above bacc certificates6 - Sub-bacc certificates

http://nces.ed.gov/das/library/http://nces.ed.gov/programs/stateprofiles/

State Data Tables and

Education Data Profiles

Current projects of interest

First-professional degree classification

• Technical Review Panel met in Dec 2005

• TRP suggestions posted, comments invited through March 8

• Revising suggestions • Will be posted at

http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/whatsnew.asp

Comments on TRP Proposal

• General agreement with TRP suggestions to eliminate first-professional but still distinguish graduate degree programs designed for research and scholarly careers from those designed for professional practice.

• Requests for further guidance in how to categorize certain degrees; either refinement of TRP proposed definitions or lists as guidance (for example, Survey of Earned Doctorate’s list of research doctorates)

Data Feedback Report 2006

• Will be sent to keyholders and CEOs in fall 2006

• Keyholders can upload custom comparison groups for their 2006 report through June 30 in the data collection system

• Instructions are available at – http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/comp_gp.asp – http://airweb.org/ (click IPEDS

Training)

Data Feedback Report 2007

• Technical Review Panel for suggestions for design of 2007 report held March 27-28 in DC

• Look for report posted under What’s New in IPEDS

Combined data allocation

• Project to allocate combined IPEDS data among parent reporters and children recently completed

• Goal was to make IPEDS data more usable

• Keyholders were contacted for input

• Allocation factors for 2004 have been added to PAS (response status information)

3 Data Quality & Validity Studies

• Compared original 2002-03 IPEDS data to revised 2002-03 data and non-IPEDS sources– http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?

pubid=2005175

• Currently doing study comparing IPEDS Finance data with data reported by institutions to EZ Audit

• Next will compare IPEDS HR data with non-IPEDS sources

Training

• AIR & IPEDS developing new modularized training materials, delivery modes, to supplement workshop format– Webinars– Online courses– Tutorials

• Covering both data submission and data use• Anthony Bichel will introduce in detail after

lunch• Table topic Tuesday & Wednesday mornings

– training support for coordinators

Webinars

• Currently available:– New Keyholders (3 versions)– Finance (3 versions)– Uploading custom comparison

groups

• Done live, then posted to AIR website – http://airweb.org/ (click on IPEDS

Training)

Web Resources

•Don’t forget to check IPEDS What’s New: http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/whatsnew.asp– Reports on recent TRPs– Reports on implementation of TRP

suggestions– In-depth discussion of other timely

issues– Links to other documents on the

web

AIR Report

New COOL (!!!)

http://collegesearch.nces.ed.gov

Background

• Revisions based on work of 2005 AIR/NCES Senior Fellow

• Purpose of project was to enhance the ongoing development and improvement of COOL

• Included:– Comparative review of COOL and other

college search sites– Interviews/focus groups with high

school students, parents, counselors

Recommendations

• Change URL– Old: http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/cool– New: http://collegesearch.nces.ed.gov

• Improve search options, include:– Map of USA to search by location– Quick search function– Search by major/program

More Recommendations

• Modify language/terminology• Revise page header to

emphasize COOL • Modify and relocate page

navigation• Incorporate compare function

Introducing the New COOL

Influences on the Future

HEA Reauthorization

• Current HEA extended through June 30, 2006

• House and Senate bills differ but both focus on consumer info and accountability

• House bill: HR 609 – passed March 30• Senate bill: S1614 – rumored will be put

on Senate calendar “soon”• Then, House and Senate versions get

reconciled

House Bill (HR609)

• Additional consumer information

• Changes to COOL web site• Prohibits student unit record

system• College Affordability Index

Consumer information

1) Provide consumers with an easy-to-use, comprehensive web-based tool for researching and comparing institutions of higher education (COOL)

2) Increase the transparency of college cost, price, and financial aid

3) Raise public awareness about postsec education, particularly among low-income families, non-traditional students, and first-generation college students

How?

• Establish Technical Review Panel to– Determine what is needed– Determine best way to collect data

(considering burden and cost)– Determine comparability of data– Redesign COOL to

•Display new data• Include sorting function, better search

mechanism

More on COOL

• Publish data on COOL--– Price of attendance and SFA (we already do this)

– Instructional expenditure per FTE student– Enrollment data (FT/PT,

resident/nonresident)– Faculty/student ratios– Faculty & staff data (FT/PT)– Graduation and transfer rates (we do this, too)

• Ability to compare institutions in COOL (we now do this)

Also on COOL:Links to institution

website• Data should include

– Mission– Accreditation– Student services– Transfer of credit policies– Placement rates and other

measures of success

Public accountability

• College Affordability Index (CAI)– Post on COOL, next to total

tuition and fees– Sanctions take effect June 30,

2010– Have tuition and fees risen more

over the last 3 years than the Consumer Price Index (CPI)?

College Affordability Index

Percentage change in the tuition and fees charged for a full-time first-time undergraduate student between 1st and last of 3 most recent academic years

-- divided by -- Percentage change in the CPI (All

Urban Consumers-Current Series) from July of 1st academic year to July of 3rd academic year

College Affordability Risk Indicator

• An institution is determined to be not at risk if – the CAI is less than or equal to 2.0; – or the CAI exceeds 2.0, but by a

dollar amount that is less than 500; – or the tuition and fees charged in

the 3rd academic year for a full-time first-time undergraduate student is within the least costly quartile of institutions within each sector

CAI on PAS

• College Affordability Index (CAI) and College Affordability Risk Indicator for 2005 are now in IPEDS Peer Analysis System (PAS) – http://nces.ed.gov/ipedspas/– Frequently Used and Derived

Variables

Outcomes and actions

• At-risk institutions– Report to Secretary of Dept of ED

•Description of factors contributing to increase in costs, tuition and fees

•Description of any other entity that participates in determinations of tuition and fee increases

•Posted on COOL

– 2-yr continuation of failure•Affordability alert status

CAI: Highest 5%

• Must form Quality-Efficient Task Force to to review operations – To include administrators and business

and civic leaders and may include faculty, students, trustees, parents of students, and alumni of such institution.

– To analyze institutional operating costs in comparison with other institutions. Identify areas to cut costs.

• The results of the analysis in the report to the Secretary

Senate Bill (S1614)

• Additional reporting requirements/consumer information

• Changes/additions to COOL• Ranking institutions by tuition

increases

Consumer Information

• Ability to compare institutions in COOL

• 10 years of cost of attendance data on COOL, including average annual cost of attendance

• SFA data (we have this already)

• % students successfully transferring academic credit

More new data

• Data on students who complete– Undergrad certificate or degree and get

a job– Undergrad degree and go to grad school

• Ranking of institutions showing– $ and % increases in tuition by quartiles

• All data will be made available for degree-granting institutions by control and level

• Assistance provided to institutions by each state

Commission on the Future of Higher Ed

• Attempt to answer questions such as: – What skills will students need to

succeed in the 21st century? – How can we make sure America

stays the world's leader in academic research?

– And, how can we make sure opportunities for quality higher education and best jobs are open to all students?

Meetings and Public Hearings

• Next Meeting—Washington, DC (May 18-19, 2006)

• Fourth Meeting—Indianapolis, IN (April 6-7, 2006)

• Public Hearing—Boston, MA (March 20, 2006) • Public Hearing—Seattle, WA (Feb 7, 2006) • Third Meeting—San Diego, CA (Feb 2-3, 2006) • Second Meeting—Nashville, TN (Dec 8-9, 2005) • First Meeting—Washington, DC (Oct 17, 2005)

Commission’s Top 5 Goals

• Vote taken at April 6 meeting:– Increasing access to college for low-

income students and adults– Improving the nation’s commitment to

lifelong learning and workforce development

– Increasing need-based aid– Doubling the number of graduates in

science and mathematics– Expanding institutional accountability

and transparency

Commission Preliminary Reports

• Preliminary papers posted to web, including Accountability/Consumer Information by Chair Charles Miller

• Report suggests that Commission will likely recommend changes to COOL as well as expansion of IPEDS data collection– Weighting and ranking on COOL– “Smaller slices” of data reported in

IPEDS

Commission Final Report

• By August 1, 2006• Will serve as a blueprint for a 21st

century higher education system • Potential to have major

implications for IPEDS• For more info, see Commission

web site:http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/hiedfuture/index.html

Wrap up – Q&A