i&o organizational vision, strategy and implementation
TRANSCRIPT
THE SILVESTRI GROUP | Thomas Silvestri, Managing Partner | 3600 N Lake Shore Drive #2608, Chicago, IL. 60613 | [email protected] | www.thomassilvestri.com
THE SILVESTRI GROUP
I&O ORGANIZATIONAL VISION, STRATEGY AND IMPLEMENTATION
Key Challenges of IT I&O Management
Thomas Silvestri
4/11/2016
THE SILVESTRI GROUP | Thomas Silvestri, Managing Partner | 3600 N Lake Shore Drive #2608, Chicago, IL. 60613 | [email protected] | www.thomassilvestri.com
1
I&O ORGANIZATIONAL VISION, STRATEGY AND
IMPLEMENTATION
Key Challenges of IT I&O Management
Summary Within the total corporate enterprise assets (CEA) that provides relevant IT business value must evolve side by side with the business organization. IT I&O teams with agile functionality are more responsive to work towards a common infrastructure to support the business. Enterprise-approved technologies and I&O sources whenever possible, and better yet they work to the to be vision for your infrastructure. If your organization uses a disciplined architecture-centric approach to building enterprise I&O of cloud service-based components to reuse and improve upon for the benefit of all current and future solutions. This is important for the long-term financial factoring of IT TCO and IRR. To co-partner with business and I&O teams this requires dedicated resources to formulate collaborative frameworks with enterprise professionals throughout the lifecycle and particularly during inception during first-time envisioning efforts. Key Challenges Effective IT governance strategies should enhance that which is being governed. An appropriate approach to governing I&O projects for CEA is first a cost and benefit investment priority, and second based on motivating and then enabling IT managers to do what is right for your organization. CEA’s common project COP’s and guidelines to increase consistency, and working towards a shared vision for your organization. Appropriate I&O governance is based on trust and collaboration, enhancement ability of I&O teams to rapid deliver business value to their stakeholders in a cost effective and timely manner. Unfortunately many existing I&O governance strategies are based on a command-and-control, bureaucratic approach which often proves ineffective. I&O impact of traditional governance strategies, and how to adopt an appropriate governance strategy in detail requires a rigorous viability co-created by IT and business service management to achieve provides greater insight for future infrastructure support, readiness within a responsive agile IT governance model.
THE SILVESTRI GROUP | Thomas Silvestri, Managing Partner | 3600 N Lake Shore Drive #2608, Chicago, IL. 60613 | [email protected] | www.thomassilvestri.com
2
I&O Organization Four Phases
Key Challenges
The I&O phase in: Awareness, Proactive, Service-alignment, Business Partner levels are the architectural framework for IT vision and implementation to achieve TCO and EAM management of the entire I&O enterprise. Business managers look to the IT I&O as 100% reliable partnership for accountability and responsible production attributes and committed service alignments. The key attributes of failure resides in level 2 called effective process management in which the processes are neither effective nor effectively managed for a proactive insights of organizational partnerships and long-term ROI. I&O predictability and operational footprint will require all phases to work in alignment with the existing (brownfield) and the new (greenfield) hybrid cloud, mobile and high availability applications functionalities. The final level 4 “valued strategic partner” is the optimization of IT service delivery in metrics, reporting, monitoring and benchmarking for a continuous process and architectural I&O improvements.
THE SILVESTRI GROUP | Thomas Silvestri, Managing Partner | 3600 N Lake Shore Drive #2608, Chicago, IL. 60613 | [email protected] | www.thomassilvestri.com
3
I&O Organization Chart
Key Challenges
Traditional CEA Organization KPI's and IT benchmarking approaches are based on trust, and therefore smart governance strategies are based on a “trust but verify and then guide” mindset. An important aspect of appropriate CEA and I&O governance is the monitoring of IT infrastructure and application support project teams through various IT project tools. One strategy is for anyone interested in the current status of an I&O team to attend their weekly / monthly I&O coordination meeting and listen to the details of the updates and corrective actions, a strategy promoted by the greater IT community. Although it’s a great strategy we highly recommend, it unfortunately doesn’t scale very well because the IT senior managers responsible for I&O to CEA asset management and governance are often busy people with many efforts to govern the complex systems from plan, build, transition and run. Hence the need for more sophisticated strategies such as operational intelligence approach supported via automated I&O dashboards for decision support systems to IT management for a holistic, agile, and dynamic real-time 24/7 operations.
THE SILVESTRI GROUP | Thomas Silvestri, Managing Partner | 3600 N Lake Shore Drive #2608, Chicago, IL. 60613 | [email protected] | www.thomassilvestri.com
4
I&O Organization Structure with Detail Mapping
Key Challenges
Adopt an IT Business Trusted-Partner Culture. I&O project teams and related work groups will work with operations and support staff throughout the lifecycle, particularly the closer you get to releasing a new application into production. IT applications and DevOps culture are baked right into I&O. Critical management decisions for CEA resource allocation on real-time projects release dates create a budget spike for new IT networking for security and service support of the application for users and new task requests. Often the unmitigated client support, incident, problem resolution, and uptime availability can slow down operational run-time due to re-allocated IT resources to support high volume of daily activities for business services and IT service delivery. To balance the requirements a program management maturity model above level 2 to coordinate and manage the optimized delivery of I&O communications plan and risk control through resolution for the corporate enterprise assets.
THE SILVESTRI GROUP | Thomas Silvestri, Managing Partner | 3600 N Lake Shore Drive #2608, Chicago, IL. 60613 | [email protected] | www.thomassilvestri.com
5
I&O Organization with Functional Relationships
Collaborative IT Best Practices. Disciplined I&O teams are learning oriented and focused on 24x7 operational capability and delivery. One way to learn is to hear about the experiences of others within the complex IT matrix of business partners and IT peer to peer networking forums. The implication is that I&O teams must also be prepared to share their own learnings with other teams. To do this function, all organizations must choose to support agile and flexible dynamic I&O work groups for quarterly discussion forums, informal presentations, training sessions delivered by senior team members, and internal conferences. The cross collaborative functional roles, responsibilities, and organizational demands should be rationalized, integrated and operationally cost effective to provide risk control IT planning and governance of the total I&O infrastructure.
Function Typical Responsibilities Organizational Relationships
I&O Business Management
Development and management of the I&O vision, strategy and business plans
Vendor management
Management of I&O audit items
Financial management
IT service management governance
Metrics and reporting
Analytics/decision making
IT and enterprise finance teams
Sourcing and procurement teams
Legal, audit and compliance/risk
management teams
IT planning and governance teams
I&O Tools
Management
Installation and support of key I&O
software tools
Tool inventory and rationalization
Tool customization and integration
Automation and orchestration
Service desks and
operations centers
I&O process managers
Infrastructure operations teams
Engineering teams
Application teams
Environment Management
Scheduling of the preproduction environments
Configuration of environments based on
Testing/quality assurance teams
Project teams
THE SILVESTRI GROUP | Thomas Silvestri, Managing Partner | 3600 N Lake Shore Drive #2608, Chicago, IL. 60613 | [email protected] | www.thomassilvestri.com
6
application-testing needs
Resolution of preproduction environment issues
Application teams
Infrastructure operations domains
Release management teams
Application Support
Incident response for key applications
Application performance tuning
Application change performance testing
Application/infrastructure production
documentation
Application change coordination
Application development teams
Infrastructure domains
Business user
communities
Infrastructure engineering teams
Project teams
Testing/quality assurance teams
Release management teams
Operations centers
Operations Center
Infrastructure and application monitoring
Event management and correlation
Follow-up of predictive issues (before they cause an incident)
Development and execution of automation routines
Job scheduling
Backups
Diagnosis and resolution of incidents
Change validation
Routine changes
Incident team support
Service desks
Incident management teams
Application support teams
Infrastructure operations domains
I&O tools management teams
THE SILVESTRI GROUP | Thomas Silvestri, Managing Partner | 3600 N Lake Shore Drive #2608, Chicago, IL. 60613 | [email protected] | www.thomassilvestri.com
7