interreg iiib cadses plancoast objectives and expected results by bernhard heinrichs ministry for...
TRANSCRIPT
INTERREG IIIB CADSES „PlanCoast“
Objectives and expected results
by Bernhard Heinrichs
Ministry for Transport, Building and Regional Development M-V, Germany
PlanCoast Lead Partner
ContentContent
1. The challenges
2. Overall Objectives
3. PlanCoast Project Area
4. PlanCoast Structure and Tasks
5. Conclusions so far
1. The challenges
• Growing conflicts among seaside activities
• Urgent need for spatial co-ordination of offshore uses
2. Overall Objective2. Overall Objective
• Strengthen ICZM through spatial planning
• Integrate land- and sea-side planning • Exchange experience between
Adriatic Sea, Baltic Sea, Black Sea
• Support EU maritime strategy
3. PlanCoast Project Area
WP 1 „Strengthening the role of WP 1 „Strengthening the role of Spatial planning in ICZM“Spatial planning in ICZM“
• Assessment of status QuoNational reports on current ICZM/Sea Use
Planning preconditionsTransnational, comparative study on the
role of Spatial Planning in ICZM in the Adriatic, Baltic and Black Sea
WP 2 „Geographical information WP 2 „Geographical information systems“systems“
• Agreement on common technical basics and set of data
• Creation of update of GIS databases
WP 3 „Sea-Use-Planning in Action“WP 3 „Sea-Use-Planning in Action“
• Preparation of Sea-Use-Plans for several 12 –sm-zone
• Sea-Use-Planning training programme for spatial planners from participating countries
Sea Use Planning of the German Baltic SeaSea Use Planning of the German Baltic Sea
WP 4 „ICZM in Action“WP 4 „ICZM in Action“
• Preparation or update of several spatial plans according to ICZM principles
WP 5 „Transnational WP 5 „Transnational Dissemination“Dissemination“
• Exchange of ICZM Best Practice
• Information and lobbying for ICZM
FinancingFinancing
• EFRE 595.000 EUR• CARDS 493.678 EUR• PHARE 334.200 EUR • TACIS 120.600 EUR • EU Financing 1.488.478
EUR • EU Co-Financing + 317.000 EUR • Non EU Co-Financing + 173.542
EUR • Total 1.979.020 EUR
5. Conclusions so far
• Spatial Planning cannot substitute the ICZM-process - but forms an essential part
• Spatial planning of the sea should become an integral part of ICZM