ARC 520G INTERMEDIATE DESIGN STUDIO IV: SPECULATION Spring 2019 MWF 1pm-6pm Jeffrey Blocksidge, RA jblocksidge@gmail.com (216) 255-2164 WMB 4.114A by appointment PREREQUISITES ARC 320D, ARC/ARI 221K, and ARC 415K with a grade of at least C in each. CURRICULUM FLAG This course carries the Independent Inquiry flag. Independent Inquiry courses are designed to engage students in the process of inquiry over the course of a semester, providing a student with the opportunity for independent inves�ga�on of a ques�on, problem, or project related to the student’s major. At least one-third of the grade will be based on independent inves�ga�on and presenta�on of one’s own work.

MEMORY PRACTICE This studio will explore the consequences of personal and cultural memory in architectural production. All the varieties of inhabitation and its experience are touched by memory; whether projecting a remembered past on an idealized future, enlisting historic fabric to enrich new construction or an unconscious preference for what’s comfortable. Memory practice; that is the action of interpreting and using history, nostalgia, ideas of utopia, mythology and futurism; is present in all architecture we think and make - intentional or not - and this studio will attempt to reveal and focus that intention. INTERMEDIATE DESIGN STUDIO SEQUENCE Students pursuing the Bachelor of Architecture must complete four Intermediate Design Studios during their second and third years. Building on the Founda�on Design Studios taken during the first year, the goal of the Intermediate Studios is to prepare students for Advanced Design Studios in their fourth and fi�h years.

Each Intermediate Studio will be structured around one of four broad themes of inquiry (Opera�onal, Environmental, Integra�on, and Specula�on) and will offer a cri�cal framework and vocabularies for design and development into key issues emphasized in the theme. Intermediate Studios will also serve as a pla�orm to prepare students for the range of offerings of the Advanced Studios (e.g. Comprehensive, Urban Design, Landscape Architecture, etc.). Intermediate Studios will follow a similar structure, but each instructor will individually determine the scope and design problem for each studio. THEME: SPECULATION This studio emphasizes architecture as an intellectual or theore�cal explora�on: emphasis on theory, raison-de-être , program , architecture and other disciplines (art, film, psychology, etc.). STUDIO STRUCTURE Assignment #1: Research and Analysis (2 weeks) ; 15% of final grade Students will work in pairs or groups. Students will research a work of architecture relevant to the studio’s overarching themes and applicable to their design pursuits later in the semester. Each student team will present their findings to the studio, which includes a verbal presenta�on + series of drawings / diagrams to visually communicate and speculate about the precedent project. Assignment #2: (2.5 weeks) 20% of final grade Students will work individually Students will design a shelter using drawings and diagrams of space(s) or moments encountered in personal memory. Students will first sketch different spaces from memory and then choose one to draw to scale; produce study models and then a final model and final drawings. Students will then propose ways to configure mul�ples of this shelter using the ideas of distribu�on and order from Assignment #1 - filling in the blanks as necessary. Assignment #3: Main project (9 weeks) ; 65% of final grade Students will work individually Students will refine their inves�ga�ons of personal and cultural memory through the design of a residen�al treatment center on Ladybird Lake. The project will engage the no�on of public access, resident privacy, part-to-whole and part-to-program rela�onships as well as the different historic phases and percep�ons of the Colorado River and Fiesta Gardens site to introduce new spaces for living, educa�on, therapy, exercise and rest. LEARNING OUTCOMES Students will be exposed to a series of learning goals several �mes and from different angles

over the four Intermediate Studio sequence. The goal is that similar issues are repeated from studio to studio but from different angles, allowing students to find, within the diversity of the topics, a “common thread” as they go through the sequence of the four studios. The level of expecta�on will grow as students go from being introduced to an issue, to becoming competent at it. Some issues would be only men�oned in passing in one studio but will be studied in more depth in another.

● Design Composition Skills : Developed through three-dimensional architectural form and space, both exterior and interior; building envelope

● Design Integration Skills : Demonstrated through crea�ve engagement with issues of materiality, structures, construc�on, and environmental system

● Site Analysis and Design : Developed through the crea�ve engagement with relevant contextual; environmental and programma�c factors underlying the project

● Critical Thinking : Quality of conceptual and cri�cal thought; learning from precedents; research skills

● Graphic Skills : Quality of presenta�on; clarity of communica�on; appropriateness of media strategy and level of skill displayed

● Basic grasp of accessibility and egress ● Collaborative and Leadership Skills : Demonstrated through the ac�ve engagement in all

ac�vi�es of the studio STUDIO CULTURE The School of Architecture believes in the value of the design studio model. Studio learning encourages dialogue, collabora�on, risk-taking, innova�on, and learning-by-doing. The studio offers an environment where students can come together to ask ques�ons and make proposals, which are developed and discussed among classmates, faculty, visi�ng professionals, and the public-at-large. Studio learning offers intensive one-on-one instruc�on from faculty members, and provides the opportunity for each student to develop his/her cri�cal thinking skills and spa�al and material sensibili�es. The design studio offers a synthe�c form of educa�on, where project-based learning becomes the founda�on for developing an understanding of and commitment to the school's core values — broadmindedness, interconnec�vity, professionalism, explora�on and ac�vism — all in service of architecture's fundamental mission: to improve the quality of the built and natural environments. h�ps://soa.utexas.edu/programs/architecture/architecture-studio-culture DESIGN CONVERSATIONS: JESSEN LECTURES The School of Architecture offers a wide range of opportuni�es for students to extend the design conversa�ons taken place in studios (Lecture Series, Goldsmith Talks, Exhibi�ons, etc). Students are encouraged to par�cipate and be engaged. Specifically, all B.Arch and BSAS students in studio are expected to a�end all the Jessen Lectures (three per semester by lead prac��oners from around the world). The lectures and the group discussions in studio that follow are important for the holis�c educa�on of intellectually engaged students and par�cipa�on will have an impact on students’ grades (see below).

EVALUATION CRITERIA While each project contains certain quan�fiable elements for evalua�on, a significant por�on of each grade is derived from broader and more subjec�ve criteria. Student work will be evaluated according to its rigor and evolu�on over the semester. Grades are subject to deduc�ons for late arrivals, absences, and late or incomplete work at the discre�on of the instructor. Grading for an assignment is broken into four components, each of which is given roughly equal weight: Pursuit: the consistent and rigorous development and tes�ng of ideas.

● The ability to formulate a query or thesis and pursue a self-determined concomitant method of inquiry

● The ability to iden�fy and implement various processual mechanisms (so�ware, sketch drawing and models, etc.) in the development of the design

● Ini�a�ve as demonstrated in work ethic – Does the student do what is asked; go beyond what is asked; direct their own efforts; eager to produce the next itera�on of the design?

Grasp: the ideas and understanding of the project at hand and integra�on of knowledge

introduced in companion courses. ● A strong and clearly stated design objec�ve ● Spa�al acuity as demonstrated in plan – including reasonable disposi�on of

programma�c elements – and sec�onal development ● Synthe�c and cri�cal thinking; the ability to holis�cally organize a project as

demonstrated through crea�ve engagement with issues of materiality, structures and construc�on, structural and environmental system integra�on, building materials and assembly, sustainable prac�ces, etc. in support of the design objec�ve

● Structural competence and material sensi�vity as demonstrated in wall thickness, floor plates, and assembly

Resolution: of the design objec�ve; the demonstra�on of competence, completeness, and

finesse in the final design presenta�on. ● Quality of presenta�on; clarity of communica�on; appropriateness of media strategy

and level of skill displayed through the work presented at all stages of the design process; technical documenta�on

Engagement: the ac�ve par�cipa�on in studio ac�vi�es, leadership, collabora�on, group

discussions and reviews. A student must earn a le�er grade of C or be�er in order for the course to count towards a degree in the School of Architecture and to progress in to the next studio. A le�er grade of C- will not sa�sfy degree requirements.

GRADE DESCRIPTIONS A/A- Excellent Project surpasses expecta�ons in terms of inven�veness, appropriateness, visual language,

conceptual rigor, cra�, and personal development. Student pursues concepts and techniques above and beyond what is discussed in class. Project is complete on all levels.

B+/B/B- Above Average Project is thorough, well presented, diligently pursued, and successfully completed. Student

pursues ideas and sugges�ons presented in class and puts in effort to resolve required projects. Project is complete on all levels and demonstrates poten�al for excellence.

C+/C Average Project meets the minimum requirements. Sugges�ons made in class and not pursued with

dedica�on and rigor. Project is incomplete in one or more areas. C-/D+/D/D- Poor Project is incomplete. Basic grasp of skill is lacking, visual clarity or logic of presenta�on are not

level-appropriate. Student does not demonstrate the required competence and knowledge base.

F Fail Project is unresolved. Minimum objec�ves are not met. Performance is not acceptable. Note

that this grade will be assigned when students have excessive unexcused absences. X Excused Incomplete Can be given only for legi�mate reasons of illness or family emergency. Simply not comple�ng

work on �me is not an adequate cause for assigning this evalua�on. It may only be used a�er consulta�on with the Associate Deans' offices and with an agreement as to a new comple�on date. Work must be completed before the second week of the next semester in which the student is enrolling, according to the School of Architecture policy.

ATTENDANCE Punctual and regular a�endance is mandatory. Par�cipa�on is expected. With three (3) unexcused absences, the student’s final grade for the course will be lowered by a full le�er grade. The final grade will be lowered by a full le�er grade for each unexcused absence therea�er. Aside from religious observances, absences are only excused with wri�en documenta�on of a medical issue or family emergency. The student is responsible for comple�ng work missed due to excused absences and ini�a�ng communica�on with the instructor to determine due dates.

If a student is late (5 minutes a�er the start of class) three (3) �mes, it will be counted as one (1) unexcused absence. Students should no�fy the instructor prior to class if lateness or absence is known in advance. Students must no�fy instructors directly regarding lateness or absences; Asking a classmate to inform the instructor is not acceptable. RELIGIOUS OBSERVANCES A student shall be excused from a�ending classes of other required ac�vi�es, including examina�ons, for the observance of a religious holy day, including travel for the purpose. A student whose absence is excused under this subsec�on may not be penalized for that absence and shall be allowed to take an examina�on or complete an assignment from which the student is excused within a reasonable �me a�er the absence. University policy requires students to no�fy each of their instructors as far in advance of the absence as possible so that arrangements can be made. By UT Aus�n policy, you must no�fy the instructor of the pending absence at least fourteen days prior to the date of a religious holy day. If you must miss a class, an examina�on, an assignment, or a project in order to observe a religious holy day, you will be given an opportunity to complete the missed work within a reasonable �me a�er the absence. ACADEMIC INTEGRITY Students who violate University policy on academic integrity are subject to disciplinary penal�es, including the possibility of failure in the course and/or dismissal from the University. Since such dishonesty harms the individual, all students, and the integrity of the University, policies on academic integrity will be strictly enforced. Refer to the Student Conduct and Academic Integrity website for official University policies and procedures on academic integrity: h�p://deanofstudents.utexas.edu/conduct/academicintegrity.php . University Code of Conduct: h�p://catalog.utexas.edu/general-informa�on/the-university/#universitycodeofconduct MENTAL HEALTH AND SUPPORT SERVICES Taking care of your general well-being is an important step in being a successful student. If stress, test anxiety, racing thoughts, feeling unmo�vated, or anything else is ge�ng in your way, there are op�ons available for help:

● In-house CARE counselor (see below) ● For immediate support

o Visit/call the Counseling and Mental Health Center (CMHC): M-F 8am-5pm | SSB, 5 th floor | 512-471-3515 | cmhc.utexas.edu

o CMHC Crisis Line: 24/7 | 512-471-2255 | cmhc.utexas.edu/24hourcounseling.html

● Free services at CMHC: o Brief assessments and referral services: cmhc.utexas.edu/ge�ngstarted.html o Mental health & wellness ar�cles: cmhc.utexas.edu/commonconcerns.html o MindBody Lab: cmhc.utexas.edu/mindbodylab.html o Classes, workshops, and groups: cmhc.utexas.edu/groups.html

CARE PROGRAM Counselors in Academic Residence (CARE) Program places licensed mental health professionals within the colleges or schools they serve in order to provide be�er access to mental health support for students who are struggling emo�onally and/or academically. Abby Simpson (LCSW) is the assigned CARE counselor for the School of Architecture. Faculty and staff may refer students to the CARE counselor or students may directly reach out to her. Please leave a message if she is unavailable by phone. Abby Simpson, LCSW | BTL 114B | 512-471-3115 (M-F 8am-5pm) h�ps://cmhc.utexas.edu/CARE_simpson.html STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Students with disabili�es who require special accommoda�ons must obtain a le�er that documents the disability from the Services for Students with Disabili�es area of the Office of the Dean of Students (471-6259 voice or 471-4641 TTY for users who are deaf or hard of hearing). This le�er should be presented to the instructor in each course at the beginning of the semester and accommoda�ons needed should be discussed at that �me. h�p://diversity.utexas.edu/disability/ SECURITY, SAFETY, AND SUSTAINABILITY The studio is an excep�onal learning environment. Since it is a place for all, it necessitates the careful a�en�on to the needs of everyone. All spraying of fixa�ve, spray paint, or any other substance should be done in the shop. Security is a necessary component for a studio that is accessible to you and your colleagues 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Do not leave your studio without your studio key and do not leave your studio unlocked. Hold yourself and your studiomates accountable for the security of your shared space. The studio is an opportunity to apply sustainability principles, being mindful to recycle and reuse to reduce material consump�on at UTSOA. Recyclable materials should be placed in blue bins or any other containers with white bags. The Material Exchange, a give-and-take system for students to donate materials and take what they need for studio and fabrica�on coursework, is available throughout the semester to all UT students in the UTSOA Technology Lab. All unwanted, reusable materials should be brought to the Material Exchange sta�on in the Technology Lab at the end of the semester. BCAL Concerns regarding the safety or behavior of fellow students, Teaching Assistants (TA), or Professors can be reported to the Behavior Concerns Advice Line (BCAL): 512-232-5050. Calls can be made anonymously. If something doesn’t feel right, it probably isn’t. Trust your ins�ncts and share your concerns.

EMERGENCY EVACUATION In the case of emergency evacua�on:

● Occupants of buildings on The University of Texas at Aus�n campus are required to evacuate buildings when a fire alarm is ac�vated. Alarm ac�va�on or announcement requires exi�ng and assembling outside.

● Students should familiarize themselves with all exit doors of each classroom and building they may occupy. Remember that the nearest exit door may not be the one used when entering the building.

● Students requiring assistance in evacua�on shall inform their instructor in wri�ng during the first week of class. In the event of an evacua�on, follow the instruc�on of faculty or class instructors.

● Reentry into a building is prohibited unless given instruc�ons by the following: Aus�n Fire Department, The University of Texas at Aus�n Police Department, or Fire Preven�on Services offices.

Informa�on regarding emergency evacua�on routes and emergency procedures can be found at: www.utexas.edu/emergency . STUDIO RULES AND ETIQUETTE My short lectures are technology-free for students. This means NO phones . Laptops and tablets are not allowed either unless accompanied by documented permission from the Office of Disability Services. Studio mee�ngs are also phone and social media free. If you must talk on the phone please use the hallway. Laptop use is obviously allowed, for work only. Use this valuable �me to engage your work and get feedback from your peers and your instructor. This policy is for your benefit! Recent studies show that having your smartphone within eyesight reduces brain power ( h�ps://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/06/170623133039.htm ). A fully func�oning brain is the most important thing you can bring to studio. Lastly, I will not comment on work presented only on the computer screen. You MUST have your work printed at a scale ON PAPER for me to review. This helps you keep a record of your ideas while providing a place for all of the comments and issues we work through together during a desk crit. USE PAPER. RECYCLE IT. REQUIRED/RECOMMENDED MATERIALS -A 25’ tape measure is very useful -Model making tools

Intermediate IV Spring 2019Blocksidge - Memory Practice

1/231pm Lottery GOL 3.120

1/251pm Start Assignment #1

1/28† 1pm Teams/Building Research Due 5pm SOA Lecture Claire Agre

1/301pm Studio Lecture GOL 3.120 2pm Desk work/crit

2/1 1pm Desk work/crit

2/4† 1pm Desk work/crit

2/6 1pm Desk work/crit

2/8 1pm Review Assignment #1 SUT 4.100

2/111pm Studio Lecture GOL 3.120 Start Assignment #2

2/13 1pm Desk work/crit 5pm SOA Lecture Deborah Berke*

2/15 1pm Desk work/crit

2/18† 1pm Desk work/crit

2/20 1pm Desk work/crit 5pm SOA Lecture Stih and Schnock

2/22 1pm Pin Up Assignment #2

2/25† 1pm Desk work/crit 5pm SOA Lecture Joan Busquets

2/27 1pm Desk work/crit

3/1 1pm Review Assignment #2 SUT 4.118

3/4† 1pm Start Assignment #3 5pm SOA Lecture Michael Murphy*

3/6 1pm Site Visit

3/8 1pm Concept Collages Due

3/11 1pm Relief Drawing Due 5pm SOA Lecture ksestudio

3/13 1pm Class Site Model Due

3/15 1pm Relief Model Due Program Study Due

3/18 Spring Break

3/20 Spring Break

3/22 Spring Break

3/25† 1pm Schematic Due

3/27 1pm Desk work/crit 5pm SOA Lecture William O’Brien

3/29 1pm Desk work/crit

4/1 1pm Mid Review Assignment #3 GOL 2.110

4/3 1pm Studio Lecture GOL 3.120 5pm SOA Lecture Elena Manferdini

4/5 1pm Desk work/crit

4/8† 1pm Desk work/crit

4/10 1pm Desk work/crit

4/12 1pm Desk work/crit

4/15 1pm Desk work/crit

4/17 1pm Desk work/crit

4/19 1pm Pin Up Assignment #3

4/22 1pm Desk work/crit

4/24 1pm Desk work/crit

4/26 1pm Desk work/crit

4/29 1pm Desk work/crit

5/1 1pm Pin Up Assignment #3 5pm SOA Lecture Ana Maria Leon

5/3 1pm Pin Up Assignment #3

5/6 1pm Pin Up Assignment #3

5/8 - 5/9 - 5/10SOA Final Reviews

*held in Jessen Auditorium †10am GOL 3.120: Benedikt