intellectual property boston college law school march 31, 2008 trademark - distinctiveness

16
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 31, 2008 Trademark - Distinctiveness

Post on 21-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 31, 2008 Trademark - Distinctiveness

Intellectual Property

Boston College Law School

March 31, 2008

Trademark - Distinctiveness

Page 2: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 31, 2008 Trademark - Distinctiveness

Overview

• Requirements– (1) Distinctiveness– (2) Use in commerce– Registration not required (although benefits)

• Duration– As long as used and distinctive

• Rights– Protect against consumer confusion– Protect against dilution (for famous marks)

Page 3: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 31, 2008 Trademark - Distinctiveness

Categories of MarksLess Protection More Protection

GenericDenotes generalclass of products

Unprotectible

Shredded Wheat,Aspirin, Thermos,Cellophane, Car,

Computer

ArbitraryBears no relation

to product

AutomaticallyProtectible

DescriptiveDescribes some

characteristic/quality

Protectible ifsecondary meaning

SuggestiveSuggests somecharacteristic

AutomaticallyProtectible

Page 4: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 31, 2008 Trademark - Distinctiveness

Policy Considerations

Distinctiveness

Generic Descriptive Suggestive Arbitrary

Low

HighTrademarkSignificance

Costs fromProtection

UnprotectibleSecondaryMeaning Protectible

Page 5: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 31, 2008 Trademark - Distinctiveness

Zatarains v. Oak Grove

Page 6: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 31, 2008 Trademark - Distinctiveness

Secondary Meaning• Definition: primary significance of the term in the

minds of the consuming public is not the product but the producer

• Factors– Consumer surveys

– Amount and volume of advertising

– Volume of sales

– Length and manner of use

– Direct consumer testimony

Page 7: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 31, 2008 Trademark - Distinctiveness

CategorizationsTrademark

• TENDER VITTLES (cat food)

• ROACH MOTEL (roach trap)

• CHAP STICK (lip balm)

• VISION CENTER (optical store)

• BEER NUTS (snack food)

• FAB (laundry detergent)

• BOLD (laundry detergent)

• STRONGHOLD (nails)

• CITIBANK (banking services)

• NUTRASWEET (sweetner)

Category

• Descriptive

• Suggestive

• Descriptive

• Descriptive

• Descriptive

• Arbitrary

• Suggestive

• Suggestive

• Suggestive

• Descriptive

Page 8: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 31, 2008 Trademark - Distinctiveness

Secondary Meaning

• Marks Requiring Secondary Meaning– Descriptive Marks– Surnames– Geographical Marks (some)– Trade Dress and Product Design?

Page 9: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 31, 2008 Trademark - Distinctiveness

Trade Dress & Product DesignTrade Dress Product Design

Page 10: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 31, 2008 Trademark - Distinctiveness

Two Pesos v. Taco Cabana

Page 11: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 31, 2008 Trademark - Distinctiveness

Two Pesos v. Taco Cabana505 U.S. 763 (1992)

• Findings of the District Court– Taco Cabana has an identifiable trade dress– The trade dress is non-functional– The trade dress is inherently distinctive– The trade dress has not acquired secondary

meaning

Page 12: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 31, 2008 Trademark - Distinctiveness

Inherently Distinctive?

Page 13: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 31, 2008 Trademark - Distinctiveness

Inherently Distinctive?

Page 14: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 31, 2008 Trademark - Distinctiveness

Policy Considerations

Distinctiveness

Generic Descriptive Inherently Distinctive

Low

HighPotential forConfusion

Harm toCompetition

Trade Dress,Trademarks

ProductDesign

Page 15: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 31, 2008 Trademark - Distinctiveness

Example - Review

Page 16: Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 31, 2008 Trademark - Distinctiveness

Administrative Details

• Next Assignment– Read through VI.C.2 – Priority