intellectual property boston college law school april 4, 2008 trademark – priority, registration
Post on 20-Dec-2015
215 views
TRANSCRIPT
Intellectual Property
Boston College Law School
April 4, 2008
Trademark – Priority, Registration
Requirements• Lanham Act § 45 (15 U.S.C. § 1125)
– Trademark. The term “trademark” includes any word, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof -
• (1) used by a person, or• (2) which a person has a bona fide intention to use in
commerce and applies to register …
– to identify and distinguish his or her goods … from those manufactured or sold by others and to indicate the source of the goods ….
Advantages of Registration
• Nationwide constructive use - priority
• Nationwide constructive notice
• Possibility of achieving incontestability
• Presumption of validity at trial
• Right to sue in federal court
• Availability of extra remedies (e.g. attorney fees, treble damages, border exclusion …)
Registration Process
• Clearing the trademark
• Start use or have bona fide intent to use
• File application
• Examination by PTO
• Publication in Official Gazette
• Registration– Or if intent to use, notice of allowance and later
filing of statement of use; then registration
Bars to Registration
• Lanham Act §2: – (a) Immoral, scandalous, deceptive; disparages
– (b) Flag, coat of arms, insignia of U.S., state, etc.
– (c) Name, portrait, signature of living individual
– (d) Likely to cause confusion with other mark
– (e) Consists of mark that is:• (1) merely descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive
• (2) primarily geographically descriptive
• (3) primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive
• (4) primarily a surname
• (5) functional
Bars - Immoral, Scandalous
• Lanham Act §2:– Shall register mark unless it:
• “(a) Consists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter, or matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt or disrepute”
Harjo v. Pro-Football, Inc.
Other Examples
“Jesus Christ” brand beer
Bars to Registration
• Lanham Act §2: – (a) Immoral, scandalous, deceptive; disparages
– (b) Flag, coat of arms, insignia of U.S., state, etc.
– (c) Name, portrait, signature of living individual
– (d) Likely to cause confusion with other mark
– (e) Consists of mark that is:• (1) merely descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive
• (2) primarily geographically descriptive
• (3) primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive
• (4) primarily a surname
• (5) functional
Examples• Lanham Act §2(e) - Examples:
– Descriptive 2(e)(1)• E.g. “ORGANIC” for organically grown oranges
– Deceptive 2(a)• E.g. “ORGANIC” for non-organic oranges
– Deceptively misdescriptive 2(e)(1)• E.g. “JOE’S FAVORITE” for oranges that aren’t Joe’s favorite
– Geographically descriptive 2(e)(2)• E.g. “FLORIDA” for Florida oranges
– Geographically deceptive• E.g. “FLORIDA” for Georgia oranges
– Geographically deceptively misdescriptive 2(e)(3)• E.g. “FLORIDA” for auto parts
– Arbitrary (geographically nondeceptively misdescriptive)• E.g. “ANTARCTIC” for Georgia oranges
Bars to Registration
• Lanham Act §2: – (a) Immoral, scandalous, deceptive; disparages
– (b) Flag, coat of arms, insignia of U.S., state, etc.
– (c) Name, portrait, signature of living individual
– (d) Likely to cause confusion with other mark
– (e) Consists of mark that is:• (1) merely descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive
• (2) primarily geographically descriptive
• (3) primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive
• (4) primarily a surname
• (5) functional
Administrative
• Next class– Read through VI.D.2 – Likelihood of
Confusion
Examples, Redux
Geographic
DescriptiveFlorida
(Florida Oranges)
Misdescriptive
NondeceptivelyAntarctic
(Florida Oranges)
DeceptivelyFlorida
(Georgia Oranges)
§2(e)(2) - Can register if Secondary Meaning
§2(e)(3) - Cannot register
Arbitrary or suggestive - Can register